TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Syntrel Archive

View 5 posts and 199 comments by Syntrel on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Now I'm even more confused.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/16 07:53 PM
2

You are leaving a decision that you have in essence already made to your wife: Enrolling your daughter in preschool full time. Take your daughter and enroll her full time. Tell your wife afterwards. Sure, she'll huff and puff about you taking the choice out of her hands, but that's to be expected. Ignore it and counter by telling her that if she wants to keep the kid home with her while she works, then it's her decision as well as her consequences to deal with. Maintain frame. You don't need to …
/r/MarriedRedPill07/02/15 02:30 PM
3

Your purely anecdotal experience does not represent all other men who have been, or might be circumcised. Anecdotal evidence is not and never will be evidence usable for a larger group of individuals. This would be akin to someone who had their pinky toe, tip of a finger or even their clitoral hood removed as a baby, and then saying that it's ok for it to be done to anyone/everyone else simply because that single person claims to be ok with it being done to themselves.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 04:06 PM
3

Affection is between two people who know each other or are fond of each other and consenting. Walking up to a co-worker and grabbing his/her junk is not affection. It's a sexual attack based on a position of power. If you feel you may get somewhere further by explaining away obvious sexual assault as affection... Good luck with that shit.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 01:43 AM
5

Two wrongs do not make a right, rather then criminalizing this type of thing when done by women, we need to decriminalize it when done by men. Affection should not be considered assault. I am fully aware that it IS considered assault currently, but imo that is not a good thing, and that idea should not be expanded. Are you a moron? Unwanted sexual advances, to which you refer to as affection, is assault. So either you're a moron or a pervert that just wants to decriminalize your fantasies of sex…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:34 PM
4

Confronting her can easily put him in a position where he can be viewed as soliciting the advances. Especially if she becomes defensive and angry from the rejection.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:30 PM
14

sit her down (RECORDING DEVICE discreetly PRESENT!!!) and tell her why it is unfair No! He should not speak to her or confront her, he should immediately go to his supervisors and report the incident.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:22 PM
5

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:33 PM
3

He may be exaggerating, but studies show repeatedly that self-reported numbers are always lower than numbers which include both self-reporting and victim testimony. The study here even shows this to be true. The true numbers are almost always double what is only self-reported by the aggressors.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:43 AM
3

Unfortunately, to many women, not being thought of as a slut or easy is more important than a man's life.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:29 AM
5

So much for that feminist myth.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:20 AM
3

This is a first for me. I still don't quite believe it. I just saw two people have a civil arguement on the internet without insulting each other. This is inspiring.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:47 PM
3

Reading the comments section for that article is a great way to see perfect examples of the circular logic inherent in that particular brand of feminism.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:41 PM
2

Perfect example of the sexist-poseur-feminist, "Anything good for men must automatically be bad for women." "These hands are not for hurting." This re-focuses our attention on the origins of violence, rather than appearing to mock those whose shoes we are meant to be filling. Translation: "Having men make a symbolic, public gesture to try to understand the female point of view, and raise awareness, on such subjects is well and good. But let's not forget that men are vicious violent abusers and t…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:23 PM
1

Two questions for the moronic fucking cunt of a mother. 1) Why the fuck are you having a nurse cut your son's dick at your house instead of the HOSPITAL THAT IS ONLY 1.5 MILES AWAY? 2) When you saw how bad the wound looked afterwards and noticed that the bleeding was not stopping, WHY THE FUCK DID YOU NOT TAKE HIM TO THE HOSPITAL? As far as I'm concerned, the parents should be charged as well for their utter fucking stupidity.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:56 AM
2

If that's the case, would not the guys already have the option of having charges filed against the older women that are harassing them?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 03:36 PM
1

Cool. TIL sexual assault and rape are ok as long as you're drunk. </s>
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:49 PM
7

Over a decade ago I was living in New Orleans. This girl and I, who were FWB, were going to hang out with some of her gay friends down in the french quarter. They were pretty cool (for the most part) and wanted us to show them around, since they were just in town for the weekend. The one exception was this one guy who was already on his way to being drunk, and had this whole "date-rape, it's ok for me to hit on you and touch you cause i'm gay and your a guy even if your straight and have told me…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:44 PM
3

Your change of maturity is appreciated.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:34 PM
3

That's when you get your boss on tape saying that again. Get a lawyer and sue the shit out of that boss for creating a hostile work environment and sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:31 PM
1

I have an idea/experiment you can try. Next time you plan to hang out with said friends that are girls, you should do this ahead of time. If you can, convince some older gents to be at said establishment when your group is there. Maybe the dad of one of you guys (male friend) and/or friends of that dad. Obviously no one that the girls would recognize of course. Have the older guys constantly hassling, hitting on and making creepy comments/gestures at the girls while your guy friends laugh it up …
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:26 PM
16

I'm more inclined to believe it's 70 users, each with 99 troll/down vote/throw away accounts.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 05:49 AM
1

I have a proposition for you. Take what you just wrote and reverse the gender identifications in it appropriately and then post it to r/feminsm. MGM is as much a Mens Rights issue as is FGM a Feminist issue, and both are human rights issues.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:03 AM
3

The article and yourself contend that the foreskins are donated, but in order for something to be donated it must be given by the owner of their own free will. Knowing for a fact that a newborn on up to a four year old boy would never consent to having his foreskin removed, I challenge the idea of these foreskins being donated. Saying they are donated by the parents or the hospital is comparable to me stealing your car and then donating it to a charity. Obviously you would have a few choice thin…
/r/MensRights22/12/11 02:59 AM
1

No, but they are exploiting the systematic genital mutilation of very young boys.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 02:35 AM
1

It's no worse better than r/beatingwomen. FTFY
/r/MensRights21/12/11 09:18 PM
3

There was a brief reference to some abuse from the mother's partner.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 08:50 PM
3

The comparison is this... The little girl claims that Christianity is rubbish because "some" Christians are crazy, violent, hateful, etc. Parents try to rationalize that this is wrong, and that the views of others should be respected even if they are different. Child exposes this false logic by questioning whether it should be respected if there are members of that group that hate you and/or wish you and your race/gender/sexual orientation extreme physical harm and violence. For comparison purpo…
/r/MensRights21/12/11 08:21 PM
3

Go the fuck away you vicious man-hating filth, and back to your hate-filled hole you call shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:48 PM
3

You forgot some. Mother leaves her four children in house to die from fire Men are too polite to tell women to lose weight Toddler beaten to death by violent stepfather a month after police and social services hand him BACK to abusive parents Mother shares blame. Left her son with someone known to abuse him. Woman steals WWI memorial plaque and sells it Emo female teenage model commits suicide after boyfriend cancels a date Woman driver claims "My foot slipped" after crashing into home with car …
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:33 PM
2

That being said not sure this is a r/Mensrights kind of thing. Circumcision in the western world is predominantly a male issue. So it only makes sense that it would be a Mens Rights issue. r/Mensrights believes that all forms of circumcision without personal consent should be banned, both MGM and FGM.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:19 PM
6

It said the foreskins were donated. Donated by whom? Certainly not the boys they were cut off from.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:14 PM
6

they are just using foreskins that are donated. Wrong. How can a newborn up to a four year old boy possibly donate his foreskin!? He cannot.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:11 PM
1

Please upvote the above comment so others can easily find the appropriate article.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:09 PM
4

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:03 PM
2

Nanny cams, get some.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:41 AM
0

Ahhhhh man, who says rape jokes aren't funny... /s?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:14 AM
2

You'd think, but most often it just allows them to rationalize their idiocy to themselves. Which only ends up making their lunatic arguments more solid, from their point of view. They equate that: (Education) + (bad and/or ignorant ideology) = Sound Theory.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:44 PM
1

Learn to read the whole fucking article dipshits, before you go off on some retarded rant. The article was in fact ridiculing the argument and special math often used by feminists saying that men unfairly make more than women. The article specifically points out how absurd this claim is, and the reasons that feminist fuzzy math on wages differences are bullshit. Next time read the whole fucking article, instead of just the headline and the first few sentences. At least then you may not look like…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:25 PM
1

Or a sociopath...
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:07 PM
3

By 2009, almost half of her drug court defendants were women. That year, Pinellas County received a $900,000, three-year federal grant to fund substance abuse treatment for women in drug court. "Almost half", yet the funding for treatment of addiction is reserved solely for women. I challenge anyone to find similar funding for addiction treatment that is for just men. I have no doubt that there is no such funding for men, for it would be immediately by labeled sexist and the funding revoked.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 05:36 PM
12

SCUMBAG AMERICAN FEMINIST Fights against teenage pregnancy and genital mutilation in third world countries Defends teenage pregnancy and genital mutilation in America
/r/MensRights19/12/11 05:04 PM
1

Yep, my bad : )
/r/MensRights19/12/11 04:53 PM
1

Dumbass. Your fucking name begins with the word Girl, if you cannot make the connection between that and what he said, then you're a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:43 AM
0

Yeah, many western american women will dump you for not being circumcised.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 04:56 PM
1

News flash asshole. Not everyone in the world speaks english as a first language, so you can just stop with the whole "literacy* bullshit, because it's just plain racist. Not that literacy even matters. You don't need to be able to speak or spell a certain language perfectly to have a valid point, and saying otherwise just proves how very little ground you have to stand on in your bigoted arguments. Check your privilege.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 04:36 PM
3

Your user name starts with girl. I'm fairly certain he used the term girl as a shortened version of your user name, not to be offensive.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 04:33 PM
6

The kind of mother that obviously thinks it's acceptable for female sexual-sadists to gang rape her smaller son in public and then have her victim son's trauma posted on the web. The girls should be charged with rape, plain and simple. Unfortunately there's no law against being a horrible fucking mother, so there's not much the law can do about her.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 03:12 AM
4

Agreed. Regardless of their age, this was blatant sexual assault. They should be listed.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 03:06 AM
1

Sorry, but you're just plain wrong. MGM is performed under that same circumstances in Africa as FGM. While many are performed in clinics funded by the UN under the idea that circumcision cures AIDS (WTF right!?), many are still performed in the bush just like FGM. There are NO LEGITIMATE benefits to circumcision. Again, there is no legitimate medical purpose for circumcision, period.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:44 PM
11

Don't you have 13 cats to feed?
/r/MensRights15/12/11 04:19 AM
2

Yes. The point is that there is a greater genetic variance in human males than human females. This obviously means that human females will "tend to clump around the median", but it also means that due to the greater variance, there is more representation of men in the high value areas statistically than women. It's not misogyny, it's just simple science, or more specifically genetics.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:47 PM
9

I'm think there are more than a few that have down voting others' comments and my own since I called their Mod, teefs, a twat.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 07:51 PM
12

I'll never understand the mindset that allows people like that to say that MGM and FGM are not comparable. They say it as if it's the most logical thing they say... It blows my fucking mind.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 06:57 AM
1

Really? The bad man made me do it??? I sincerely hope you are being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 04:46 AM
1

I wonder if they think it would be ok if the parents wanted to have genital mutilation done on their female infant?
/r/MensRights14/12/11 04:30 AM
2

It's a pointless debate anyway. The ruling elite by definition are a very small percentage of the population, and the simple fact that most are men and most are white in no way benefits the vast other percentage of white males in the population. The elite only care about themselves, and hardly take into consideration whether those less fortunate are white, black, male or female. It's not sexism that keeps them in charge or in wealth, it's elitism.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 09:54 PM
1

All genital mutilation without the consent of the victim/patient is wrong, period.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 06:08 PM
4

I don't deny that there are more women in poverty status than men, but i would argue that much of that is due to the amount of single mothers there are in the U.S.. I would also argue that the amount of single mothers is in large part due to the feminist idea that being a single mother is a good thing, and that women do not need the father to be around to contribute.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 06:04 PM
3

Being at the top has very little to do with being white or male, and everything to do with wealth. correlation =/= causation
/r/MensRights13/12/11 06:02 PM
1

Not everyone should or even needs to find fulfillment in their employment. If you do find fulfillment in your job that's great, but looking for fulfillment in employment rather than your personal life is a misplaced priority IMO. I believe this to be one of the inherent flaws as a mindset amongst many women, and men, that are led to believe that work = fulfillment.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 05:59 PM
7

serious discourse You have yet to even once attempt anything remotely similar to serious discourse. Your comments so far have been nothing but immature drivel. We openly welcome intelligent and mature debate from feminists.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 03:53 PM
4

And what percentage of homeless are women in relation to men?
/r/MensRights13/12/11 03:48 PM
5

So how does feminism care about men's rights? I'm genuinely curious. You have yet to answer anyone in an intelligent and mature manner. So far all you have posted are misandrist insults, instead of actually advocating for feminism at all.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 02:55 PM
-5

Yeah. Let's all quit our jobs at the first sign of unhappiness or anytime I don't fell fulfilled by my work. /s Here's a little secret that I'm going to let you and any other feminists or would be career women in on. Most men do not look for fulfillment in their work, that's what families and leisure time is for. Men work because it simply must be done, not because it makes them feel complete.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 02:00 PM
-5

Isn't it funny that what men call being responsible, feminists refer to as a negative male trait. They call it a symptom of patriarchy, but they just don't realize it's as simple as being a fucking grown-up.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 01:56 PM
-5

Known troll bigot. ^
/r/MensRights13/12/11 01:54 PM
-3

I've had feminists tell me they could not become engineers because it was "male dominated". I read that same exact excuse used for surgeons too, in an article posted a few days ago on Reddit.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 01:50 PM
2

The unfortunate thing is that there are some legitimate concerns raised by some men's rights activists. Male circumcision and false rape claims are unfortunate occurrences in today's society. The problem is that male circumcision and female circumcision are different issues WTF! With bigoted crap like this, is it any wonder we oppose feminists? Feminism does not fight men. Blatant lie. I guess it was mens rights advocates that pressured and lobbied the government to pass VAWA and see men as defa…
/r/MensRights13/12/11 01:45 PM
7

lol, another srs fanboy?
/r/MensRights12/12/11 07:12 AM
8

IF men were truly treated as equals to women in respect to life, but when one genders life is not equal to the other, there is a value amount being displayed.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:54 AM
2

What he said. ^
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:52 AM
3

SRS is full of misandrist bigots. They equate any desire of mens rights to be oppression of women, and often times are just flat out man hating bigots. The burden of proof is on the accuser making the claim, not on you.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:42 AM
2

So, for women to not be afraid of reporting rape, men need to have no rights at all? This is basically the gist of what you and feminists in general say about FRA, and it's bullshit. The social stigma of a false rape claim never goes away and it has ruined many mens lives.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:37 AM
1

Animals manage to distinguish sex without social cues. That statement completely dismisses the thousands of species of animals that have social structures.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:30 AM
-1

This bullshit revision of rape is just another slap in the face of men, and further excuses bad decisions made by women by putting the consequence of their bad choices on unsuspecting men.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:23 AM
1

I suggest you educate yourself on the differences between an obligation in which you have choice, and one in which you do not. Here are some very informative videos: LPS 1 LPS 2 LPS 3
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:13 AM
2

One more bigot and you fembots could have a full on circlejerk!
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:10 AM
5

WOW! Double whammy right there. A veritable two-fer of feminist logical fallacy. "It's not me/us, it's them!" -and- "Well you're probably just sexist!"
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:09 AM
4

Many laws have been passed since the beginning of the feminist movement, and even some before, that have completely absolved any risk to women that make bad and stupid decisions. If you choose to not see this, or you simply choose to ignore it out of convenience is just further proof of what the post is discussing. Female Privilege.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:06 AM
0

Your question couldn't have been more pointless if you tried. A simple knowledge of society and laws would bring anyone with a rational and logical ability to form an educated conclusion. If you're too stupid to be able to see what is happening, then your ignorance is not his responsibility.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:03 AM
4

Professions like Surgeon or other such VERY important or demanding jobs do not belong in the realm of affirmative action or quota requirements. These people literally cut people open and fix them from the inside all while the patient is on a razors edge away from death. The people that perform this job should be those that are best at it and best at handling the stress involved. Think about it this way, say you or someone you loved needed major organ transplant surgery. Would you want the surgeo…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 08:46 AM
18

Because then society would have to acknowledge that the life of a man is as valuable as the life of a woman.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 08:32 AM
8

I don't really think it's a reassurance thing, but it certainly is proof that our society looks at pain and suffering of men or boys, as opposed women or girls, as acceptable. If this wasn't the case, then MGM would have been banned right along with FGM.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 07:54 AM
46

Sharon Osborne will be giddy with delight over another man brutalized, saying he deserved it...
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:14 AM
4

Lately in this subreddit I've noticed a few PC white knights harping on anyone that would talk shit about a bigoted feminist or just a woman that is a terrible excuse for a person in general. Frankly I'm fucking sick of having these "Good Men Project" pricks telling me to tone it down. How's this for toned down? Go paint your butch girlfriend's toenails you fucking bitch. Edit: Fuck it, and fuck this subreddit. For those of you that haven't sold your testicles to the feminists in exchange for mi…
/r/MensRights10/12/11 05:10 AM
-1

There's at least 2 white knight concern trolls in the thread going after anyone that insults the piece of trash in the video.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 08:45 PM
14

"It is no measure of good health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick world."
/r/MensRights09/12/11 07:05 PM
4

Of all the fucked up content in that comment, you chose spelling for your critique?
/r/MensRights09/12/11 09:45 AM
2

lol, this thread seems to have been invaded by white knights that want to swoop in and defend the fair maiden trashy whore worthless excuse for a human being.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 09:37 AM
-8

You say potato, I say whore. worthless fucking excuse for a human being. Better?
/r/MensRights09/12/11 09:35 AM
-9

Prostitute. I do not think you realize that I don't fucking care what you take the meaning to be.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 08:56 AM
-5

What is illogical about it. She used the pretense of intimacy (not necessarily sex, but intimate friendship) to get free food from dozens of unsuspecting men. She may not have took them behind a dumpster for $40 bucks for a BJ, but she's still a prostitute. Celda is right about one thing. At least you know what the deal is with a prostitute.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 07:36 AM
-6

I don't give a shit what some PC crusader says. There is nothing good about being a whore worthless fucking excuse for a human being. Thus, whores worthless fucking excuses for a human being should be ashamed.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 05:53 AM
4

W.H.O.R.E. Worthless fucking excuse for a human being. Edit: due to the hounding of the sycophantic white knights I'm revising my statement.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 05:50 AM
1

Sounds like an excuse for justifying genocide if I ever heard one... Edit: Another gem from the same bigot
/r/MensRights08/12/11 03:18 AM
5

not used to hearing a woman speak like this. Please be careful of how you word your statements. That could come off as sounding misogynist. Maybe you could say instead, "I'm not used to hearing such topics spoken of in such a logical and rational manner.". Just a suggestion.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 02:28 PM
3

Generations of social attitude and prejudice have lead to this idea that men should take responsibility regardless of whether they have a choice or not, and regardless of whether the risk is greater for them or not. Feminists call this patriarchy, and say it hurts men too, but they have no problem it seems using it to force men into the situation described here and other situations as well. This is the main problem I have with feminism, and it makes it very hard for me to trust feminists without…
/r/MensRights07/12/11 02:26 PM
6

Too elaborately, how is that possible unless the person reading, watching or listening is simply uninterested and "does not" out of boredom?
/r/MensRights07/12/11 02:21 PM
4

I believe she has a blog that she posts to currently. Though I'm sure if asked, she may not mind posting to, or having her posts linked to on AVfM. It's worth asking either way.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 02:18 PM
1

GWW, have you managed to have a civil discussion with any feminists or other like minded people on this topic? I'm just curious as to where such things can be debated without the discussion turning into a flame and troll fest.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 02:15 PM
2

She has already posted a second video on legal paternal surrender. I really wish we could have a reasonable and civil discussion about this topic with feminists and womens rights advocates, but it seems like the mere mention of it sends them into a frenzy.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 02:12 PM
10

obvious troll is obvious. Get out.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 02:10 PM
1

Ahem... And the following comment. If you are sincere in your desire to make r/mensrights something more useful, then I applaud this. As I said before though, I am suspect of your sincerity.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 06:19 PM
1

I'm in agreement that r/mensrights could be a useful platform for mens rights advocacy. Unfortunately as you have just pointed out, many times this idea is discarded for pointless reposts and circlejerks. I myself have made a self post trying to encourage and motivate others to a more activist role instead of slackivist. However my post was met with cynicism and indifference and intolerance. I'm not sure that r/mensrights has the ability to accomplish anything worthwhile currently, given the att…
/r/MensRights04/12/11 06:15 PM
1

I share you sentiment, but I can't help but be suspicious of your sincerity considering your comments when I asked a similar question in a submission I made a couple days ago.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 06:10 PM
2

I can't believe or even understand why this is getting down votes. This is a perfect example of a violation of ethics in medicine. How can any medical professional say that circumcision has any effect what so ever on the chances of contracting any STI. The idea is pure fiction. It infuriates me to no end that MGM is of no consequence to the majority of the world, when FGM is been outright banned in most western and other civilized nations. How do they not see the comparison of ignorance and brut…
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:57 PM
1

My natural response would be to point out the obvious lack of empathy for the person who's life has been potentially ruined by a false accusation.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:13 PM
4

You suggest you advise him to discreetly get in touch with a good divorce lawyer. From what you say about this woman's attitude and personality, she is a perfect example of a parasite. If he doesn't do something soon to resolve the situation, you may be forced to ask him to leave the business.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:09 PM
1

I don't know why you got a down vote for this comment. Everything you said just now was absolutely true.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 06:00 AM
3

Ahh, you made me lol irl.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:53 AM
1

If you're statement regarding studies is such then please provide a credible source. I'm not insinuating that you are a deliberate liar, merely that without proof I must regard your statement as anecdotal. I'm not being hostile. I have no problem letting you know this. If you feel it is hostile then that is not my fault. If you wish to use this as an excuse to not discuss facts then that is your choice. I have no problem with acknowledging facts for facts. I am not threatened by the truth, I wel…
/r/MensRights04/12/11 04:28 AM
0

Yes, brilliant. Let's further instigate unhelpful arguments instead of putting effort into the actual purpose of mens rights.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:55 AM
1

I realize this, but there is a difference between bringing lies and oppression to awareness and simply complaining and circle-jerking around a post that is not at all unlike the hundreds that we see here each week.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:55 AM
1

Thank you very much. I hope you and your father are doing well.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:53 AM
1

I'm not talking about ignoring those that actively marginalize the rights and equality of men. We should though, ignore those that actively wish to antagonize and derail the discussion of mens rights and equality. There is a difference between awareness and complaining.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:52 AM
1

Men also work far more hours per day and week than women do too. Men in general also have longer commutes to work. Your statement, and those of many advocates of this statistic fail to include these facts in their argument. Your statement on men being unwilling to be involved in their children's care is anecdotal at best, and completely insulting personally. Actually it would make sense for the courts to recognize that children need a father and and mother. It would also make much more sense if …
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:50 AM
1

I've participated in a few local programs and campaigns to raise awareness of mens health issues and legal rights. I've also volunteered for programs to lobby the Maryland senate against certain pieces of legislation proposed by certain state senators that would further erode the rights of men and fathers. I'm a father and I work, so I can't devote myself to these projects full time. I just do as much as I can. I'll decline to be more specific. I prefer my anonymity.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:39 AM
1

I understand. My response was a bit harsh. I just get tired of seeing the constant complaining about injustice and inequality without any motivation on their part to actually do anything about it. We all need somewhere to vent our anger and frustrations, but eventually there comes a time where you need to shit or get off the pot.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:37 AM
0

It doesn't mean it can't or shouldn't be used as a platform for community and awareness as well. Just because you prefer to not do anything, doesn't mean you should or need to influence others to do so. It also doesn't mean you need to or should crap on those that would use it to greater benefit. My apologies for coming off so harshly. Your statement was rather frustrating to me.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:34 AM
1

Are you fkn kidding me?! r/malelifestyle needs to be renamed to r/efeminitemalelifestyle. Al it is is metro-sexuals posting their beauty tips and questions, it's worse than 2X.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 01:43 AM
2

Rape culture perpetuated by the matriarchal society wut?
/r/MensRights04/12/11 01:12 AM
2

Anyone with worthwhile information stating why he wasn't or hasn't been placed in his father's custody?
/r/MensRights04/12/11 01:03 AM
1

You could easily end up in jail for contempt of court, or disobeying a court order.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 10:20 AM
5

C'mon now. Everyone knows that men are born sexual predators and are further indoctrinated though patriarch society and rape culture. Seriously though, it's a bit of a stretch blaming rape on women. Unhealthy familial relationships resulting in bad upbringing are more due to our societal acceptance of weakening the family as a whole. We put too much hype into both parents being away from home which really affects children negatively, girls and boys. It puts a lot of stress on marriage relationsh…
/r/MensRights03/12/11 09:18 AM
4

Then you are confirming that you'd rather do nothing more than circlejerk around some misandrist post instead of advocate Mens Rights. I suppose it's easier to bitch and moan and play the victim card instead of actually fucking doing something. Hmm, now what group of redditors does this attitude remind me of???
/r/MensRights03/12/11 03:54 AM
0

Thank you.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 02:10 AM
2

I'm not going to sugar coat this. Get a lawyer. Reddit is nothing compared to sound legal advice. Get a lawyer and get one that will advocate for your rights as a father.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 02:00 AM
1

What she did was dishonest and totally fucked up. She tricked him into a lifelong debt that he had no knowledge of. But sex has inherent risks. His belief that she was still on the pill does not completely exempt him from all responsibility. If she says "I take responsibility", that doesn't mean he should not use some form of insurance to protect himself. I don't think this would constitute as victim blaming. With something as important as this, it is wise to take every precaution available to a…
/r/MensRights30/11/11 04:18 PM
-9

No offense, but responsibility for avoiding pregnancy goes both ways. It's unfortunate that you cannot trust her, but you still have to accept the risks and consequences of not using protection yourself. If you do not plan on staying with her, then I advise you to get a good lawyer immediately.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 02:32 PM
10

And what of her crime? Any prosecution at all? Doubtful... His life ruined indefinitely, her life inconvenienced temporarily... Where is the justice?
/r/MensRights29/11/11 07:42 PM
2

Fact: Typing fact with a colon does not make the following statement fact. Most violent criminals that are women are usually not sentenced as harshly and the prisons they are sent to are not nearly as horrible as those men are sent to. There are also far less community or other such systems and organizations to help men that are in a situation which may lead to them resorting to crime as a means of survival. A perfect example of this is that 90% of all homeless people are men. Some men are perve…
/r/MensRights29/11/11 05:04 AM
1

You make the assumption that I have done nothing outside of Reddit to advocate my positions. You are wrong, but this is not unexpected. I see this attitude all the time on Reddit.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 04:17 AM
1

Yes but at least there they have laws for shared custody. regardless of whether or not they enforce them, they still have them.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 03:44 AM
2

He's not a liar Celda. He's just not aware of the situation in America because he lives in Australia I assume. He wouldn't know the gender bias here.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 08:41 PM
2

You're links mostly pertain to Australia or countries other than America, though there are a couple in your links. Unfortunately none of the organizations even collectively would equal the lobbying power of a handful of womens advocacy groups. There's not nearly the support for men in America as there is it seems. I find this somewhat depressing. I don't wish less advocacy for women, i just wish the same advocacy for mens issues. S.A.F.E (Stop Abuse for Everyone) (not specifically for men, it's …
/r/MensRights27/11/11 08:39 PM
1

I'd argue that most of the mothers on "Toddlers and Tiaras", and parents who push kids into activities that are of more interest to the parents than the kids, are objectifying their children. I don't deny this at all, but the user's comment was pretty much a blanket statement. And states that parents have no right to influence how a child should behave in respects to society? I don't smother my children, I'm there when they need me and close enough when they don't. I think it is my job as a pare…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 08:08 PM
1

I hope you get everything you deserve for the maliciousness you spread. You are a representation of the most diseased aspects of the human race. Those like you should not be hurt or killed, but captured and preserved for others to see in a museum for the display of a human behavior that is like a malignant tumor. In all honesty I pity you. It must take a person with absolutely no sense of self worth to act how you do.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:58 PM
1

Making light of any genital mutilation makes light of both. You should not do this even in joking.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:55 PM
1

Are you saying that male genital mutilation is not an important issue? You need citations to verify that millions of children each year get their penises sliced on for nothing? This coming from a troll who's only purpose in life is to troll the Internet spewing misandrist filth everywhere you can? Who also is completely incapable of backing up any argument with fact or citation what so ever. Not that what you write can be considered an argument, since it is nothing more than the ranting of an im…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:54 PM
1

No, the real reason is purely financial. It is the same reason you see many bars and clubs with Ladies night but no Gentlemen night. Women get in at reduced price and drink at reduced price, this attracts more women to the establishment. More men will want to come to the establishment because of the large amount of women, but will pay full price at the door and at the bar. This has been going on since it was culturally acceptable in society for women to frequent bars in the 1920's. Though the pr…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:48 PM
2

It's cheating when you use intelligence against it. It doesn't know how to react to it, except to insult. because your "sources" will fall apart under rational scrutiny Your turn troll.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:28 PM
1

OK, here's some female privilege. There are NO government funds specifically for mens health issues. There are numerous for womens health issues. Even though women have longer lifespans then men. The retirement age for women is less then men in most western countries. Men of military age are required to give their lives in wars, even if they don't believe in the war. Women are not. Women make more per hour worked than men, work less hours, have more time off, get maternity leave. Men have to wor…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:19 PM
1

The worst thing about your kind of feminism is that it is in itself inherently misogynistic. It preaches female empowerment while demanding the establishment and all men do everything they can to lift them up and protect them. This is not equality. It perpetuates the myth that anything that puts women above men in any situation is empowerment and that women are incapable of bigotry. This is actually the essence of chivalry -women and children first-, which is misogynistic. Throughout society's h…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:03 PM
2

Deserve has nothing to do with responsibilities idiot. As a parent, your children are you priority -or should be at least- everything else comes second. If you were a parent you would have a fucking clue.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:56 PM
1

Not that you're even remotely interested in facts considering you live in a fantasy fairy tale land of elitist privilege... source Also, apparently having jacked up parental rights laws and a biased judiciary makes men default abandoners when their ex's use children as leverage in custody hearings. Which by the way results in far more single mothers then fathers because fathers have next to no rights in family courts.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:49 PM
2

More insults and nonsensical out of context literary diarrhea.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:32 PM
2

Typical logical fallacy arguments. Take everything out of context and project generalizations onto others. You are so full of yourself you may just explode into a million pieces of shit stains.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:29 PM
1

I don't get mad at children. And since you cannot in any way disprove what he has said, you -as usual- resort to childish and pathetic insults.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:20 PM
1

bigoted talking points bingo. exhibit #1732 on why this place has no intellectual credibility This coming from a resident of the troll-circlejerk central hub we know and love as SRS. Go away.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:18 PM
1

You don't have any more right to be here than those that teefs and other mods have banned from SRS simply for defending their rights to not be forced to fit into SRS's world views.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:02 PM
0

Go the fuck back to SRS you goddamn hypocrite. You have the gall to call others out for generalizing other when you yourself have told people "No one cares about you and your retarded kids." You aren't a mod here, so please... GTFO bigot Also, no one is enforcing "heteronomativity". We do have a right to defend our choice to be heterosexual, or homosexual... What ever the case may be. We aren't against anything except bigoted misandrists and pathetically humorous white knights and their own bran…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:51 PM
1

Me? I've always lived with my children. That's what I'VE lived. Your case while commendable is not a case description of the average case. It doesn't take a Man to know what any feminist would know. That NOW has repeatedly and effectively lobbied against the rights of fathers in parental rights for many years. This is not mansplaining as some might say, it's a matter of public record, and NOW triumphantly displays it's wins at the cost of thousands of fathers and children. In a way it is even pr…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:36 PM
1

Just because you hate that I am a man, in no way: A) makes me wrong. B) makes you right. However, your pathetic and crude attempts to insult and/or anger me are wasted. Real men don't get angry and "react" to children, though a majority of women do.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:24 PM
5

Funny enough, that is pretty much verbatim SRS ideology.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 01:17 PM
2

Feminists only accept facts so long as they can be taken out of context and skewed to further their cause.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 01:15 PM
8

There are groups that target violence specifically against men too, this is just one that exists to a different end. There are no groups that target violence specifically against men, period. There are no groups that have lobbying support specifically for mens issues for: Health, Violence, Parental rights, Education, and many others. Its existence doesn't prevent the existence of other organizations that do other things, nor does it denigrate their cause... NOW, a large and powerful lobbying gro…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 01:06 PM
7

Well unfortunately it appears that she is buying into the false hype that feminists use to advocate their privilege. I call it privilege because it in no way anymore for the most part resembles equality. Even most "accepted" statistics that show women as victims, socially or familiar, are very contextual and do not portray an accurate measure. Even as these statistical studies are increasingly proving female privilege, any time this is ever brought up it is quickly silenced by shaming and misand…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 12:50 PM
13

Why are you friends with such a bigoted misandrist?
/r/MensRights27/11/11 11:09 AM
5

Can you be egailtarian while advocating men's rights at the same time? Absolutely. Though this in no way means that people should have to put up with blatant man hating and misandry. From what I have seen, a majority of those that advocate for men's rights are just advocating for equal rights. For too long feminists have been fear mongering and lobbying the feminist agenda that they are in fact the essence of privilege now. Something that they continue to claim men have, and refuse to admit that…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 09:52 AM
13

More white knight bullshit...
/r/MensRights27/11/11 09:37 AM
0

Yet you will never get a feminist to acknowledge the overwhelming statistics on child abuse, neglect or murder perpetrated by women.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 09:31 AM
8

Privilege. Something they swear men have, and will zealously deny having themselves.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 09:28 AM
0

Since feminists seem to think that men are worthless and should be feminized, I'd like to see what would happen if all men in the western word simply went on a one week, or even a month long strike and did nothing except worry about themselves and their kids. I'd like to see how long it would take for society to fall apart without men doing the jobs that women don't or won't do that they so love to use as their bullshit basis for wage disparity statistics.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 09:27 AM
-1

Such utter misandrist bullshit. Makes absolutely no mention of judicial disparities for arrests, charging and sentencing differences between men and women. I'm fairly certain that if women were treated as men were by law enforcement and the courts, those numbers would be alot different. I swear, these privileged elitist hags won't be happy until they've neutered every man in the western world.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 09:22 AM
3

Unfortunately with the current legislation in place and the protocol of a mass majority of police departments, all a woman has to do is call the cops and say the man did it, and and claim spousal abuse too. Even is there is no evidence of spousal abuse, the cops are required to arrest the man or at least force him to leave their house. Meanwhile a child is trapped with an abusive woman as their only legal guardian while the man can only try to reverse the charges in a legal system that is incred…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:31 AM
5

Yeah, lets up vote therealxris circlejerk and down vote devastatingwoundchan rational argument. </s> The lack of intelligence displayed by some redditors confounds me.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:27 AM
3

Shhh. If you keep posting this stuff, the Rape Culture argument that radical feminists love to use so much will sound even more like bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:23 AM
17

Actually most most child abuse is perpetrated by women. Approximately 58 percent (57.9%) of perpetrators were women and 42 percent (42.1%) of perpetrators were men. Source 2006 ACF More than 40 percent (44.4%) were men and more than one-half (53.8%) were women; 2 percent (1.8%) were of unknown sex. Victim data were analyzed by relationship of duplicate victims to their perpetrators. Nearly two-fifths of victims were maltreated by their mother acting alone. One-fifth of victims were maltreated by…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:01 AM
1

Because you're better than that?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 03:38 PM
0

Since you seem to be oblivious to parental rights where custody is concerned I'll let you in on it. Women get preference in child custody and generally get much more say in custody arrangements too, as far as visit scheduling. Violating these schedules is usually grounds for loss of visitation rights either temporarily or indefinitely until the child is 18. There are no laws that require a woman to spend child support on the child, only laws that require the child support be paid. Woman generall…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 03:36 PM
1

I'm sure he wasn't aware of your personal and Internet-wide law of posting source and citation for all personal experiences. Please excuse him and then promptly go fuck yourself with a chainsaw.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 03:16 PM
13

Just further proof that fathers have no rights anymore as far as their children are concerned, and we have feminists to thanks for this. Feminist lobbying groups have been fighting against shared custody and fathers' rights for years.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:24 AM
3

I'm against circumcision You say that but your actions say otherwise. Anyone that supports SRS can not truly say they are against MGM considering the subreddit header they had for the longest time which made a joke out of circumcision. I'd find it hard to to believe anything said by half the users/mods from SRS. I've seen the kind of hypocrisy and prejudice used there on many occasions.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 05:57 AM
2

Normally it wouldn't, but there's risk in any surgical procedure.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 12:39 PM
4

No, she didn't. Just recently I saw an image of how they literally strap baby boys down with velcro straps to hold him there during and after. It literally looks like is sadistic torture. Not for the squeamish.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 12:37 PM
4

I suppose once I get past the idea that he is comparing my son's foreskin to a wristwatch that was stashed in some POW's anus for several years. There is some analogy... But no, I understand his intent and appreciate his intentions. You're right, that is the point. I should have made certain that my position was firm, as should any would be fathers that read this. All too often, most women and many men don't really think of circumcision as a big deal, so make it a big deal.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 10:51 AM
13

I'm not going to argue with you. You're obvious display of ignorance would make it futile. I'll just say it's not just a circumcision. I have no problem informing those that have questions, but I'll not waste time on those that are willfully ignorant.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 08:15 AM
3

I'm sure I will probably get over it, but it will always be there. It's not something that I lord over her either. I have maybe brought it up once since we discussed it after the fact a few days ago. This post was not for me to rant. It was for me to let other would be fathers know to make sure their spouses know where they stand.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 08:08 AM
11

It disgusts me that women do this. I would like to see an MRA initiative that would have people marching in front of many of these cosmetic stores holding signs that graphically depict what it is exactly that these women are smearing all over their faces in the name of superficial vanity.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 07:18 PM
2

I think it's a great way to raise awareness. Unfortunately the feminists will undoubtedly say it promotes the objectification of women and rape culture or some other bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 06:14 AM
33

Disclaimer: This site isn't completely real. It's a project for Fast Company magazine, designed to address the issue of perspective parents disproportionately wanting a boy. The stats aren't real. The submissions aren't real. But the issue is. So look around. Enjoy yourself. And maybe learn something in the process. TIL that some people will do and say anything to completely dehumanize one gender to elevate the other above it. So much for all that equality bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 06:11 AM
4

Humans, in general, will get what they desire from the easiest source. In this case it men, getting what they desire in sex from porn. This should really come as no surprise to anyone, woman or man. Given the choice between putting up with someone that may or may not turn out to be a complete bitch or creep to get personal fulfillment, OR getting what you want without the stress and emotional hang ups, most people will choose the less stressful source. This should also come as no surprise consid…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 04:39 AM
32

I don't understand how idiots like this Dr. Morris can even be allowed to practice medicine in a civilized country after making such ridiculous claims, all in an effort to advocate cutting a newborns penis just so it looks different. This was a great article, I just wish my wife had read it before she took it upon herself to decide what my son's dick should look like. It makes it hard to not believe sometimes that this barbaric ritual is continued in part so that superficial middle aged women ca…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 03:34 AM
2

Honestly, the best thing you can do is contact the guy and/or his attorney and tell them. You can go to the cops, but if they are determined to make a case regardless of innocence or guilt, they will do everything they can to discredit you.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 09:08 PM
34

It burns me that a movement that once was capable of doing a lot of good is now doing so much harm as well.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 04:50 AM
19

no no no! It's patriarchal society's fault! Not hers! */s
/r/MensRights13/11/11 04:24 PM
2

Why on earth would you link something so goddamned fucking stupid?! That is the most insane, illogical pile of shitworm infested dumbassery I have ever read. She actually quotes philosophy in an attempt to debunk scientific LAW! HOW CAN THEY NOT SEE WHY WE THINK THESE PEOPLE ARE BATSHIT CRAZY?! ... i can never unread that... where's my hammer?
/r/MensRights13/11/11 04:18 PM
4

Not all feminists believe it is Man's fault for the patriarchal society. It's kind of sad how much extreme or fringe feminism gets posted here and taken to generalize for all of feminism. While I'm sure that may be true, unfortunately the non-radicals seem to still be remaining quite quiet while supporting blogs and lobbying groups that actively pursue agendas of inequality. Instead of saying it's not most feminists that are this way, maybe they should stop supporting these sexist agendas and no…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 03:50 PM
2

Oh I know. I know that the true intentions of feminism is humansim, or total equality between all peoples. Unfortunately the loudest voices in the feminist community have been these ultra radical feminists who nonstop spout this "all men are rapists by default for having the audacity of being born with a penis" bullshit, and while I know these are not the words of the majority, I'm waiting for the majority to stand up and say hey, "stfu you gynosupremacists, we want equality. Not the complete im…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 05:45 AM
2

So apparently voicing your admiration for a quality you have preference for in someone else is objectification. OK, sorry...The Entire World is wrong and we are all objectifying everyone. And apparently animals are guilty of this too. Shame on us for not having evolved to a point where physical health or beauty has no bearing on sexuality.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 04:25 AM
3

This is utter nonsense. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having a preference. By your very definition, "I personally think that making generalizations about the type of people we find attractive is not useful and actively counter productive.", people that have a preference for males or females are generalizing. Who the fuck are you to say whether someone should or shouldn't find what they see as attractive, attractive?! Your ridiculous logic leads me to believe you see all forms of sexual …
/r/MensRights13/11/11 04:21 AM
4

The statement "I like blondes" ignores all characteristics of a person other than the color of their hair. No, it doesn't. It highlights an attribute which you have preference in. It does not exclude anything except for that it is the only thing you are referring to at that current point in time. Me, personally. I like petite women. That does not mean that I am ignoring everything else about them, it simply means that I like petite women. It seems that those that look for reasons to categorize o…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 04:15 AM
2

EVERYONE has preferences when it comes to what they find physically attractive. So by her's and your own definition EVERYONE and even all animals support rape culture and/or objectification. Although anyone with half a fucking micro gram of reason knows that all animals, humans included, are quite literally programmed genetically to find suitable mates with good genetics. This also means attractiveness. Having a preference is not objectification, it's a personal choice of what you prefer and ALL…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 04:11 AM
38

That's the best part! See, when they do it, according to them it's either: Mans fault for the patriarchal society, or it's not objectification/sexism/whatever because it's OK when women do it. Seriously, that is how they think. Man finds attractive woman attractive = Rapist. Woman finds attractive man attractive = Natural. And all this ALSO applies to all the activities that women do as well, like indulging in male prostitutes, male strippers, pornography, etc... When women do it it's empowermen…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:09 AM
2

Also, pretty sure this would fit in quite well in r/wtf.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:03 AM
7

I would say this is one of the most ridiculous fucking things i have ever forced myself to read in my entire life, but then I remember that this kind of delusional written vomit is on par with just about everything else I've seen on feminist/misandrist blogs. And for all those, *"It's not us, it's the radical feminists. We're not all like that.", out there. It's pretty fucking hard to take feminism seriously when most of what anyone sees about feminism is vomitous bile like this. Maybe if the "N…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:02 AM
10

I agree. I was pretty pissed off when I was cleared to see my newborn son and found that he had been circumcised without consulting me. Also it amazes me how many feminists argue that circumcision or male genital mutilation is not as harmful as female genital mutilation, where the clitoral hood and/or clitoris is removed for religious reasons. (cleared: I had shingles and could not enter the pediatrics ward til the doc cleared me)
/r/MensRights12/11/11 10:57 PM
6

I love how neither the study nor article show how women statistically out perform men in cognitive skills dealing with language functions (reading, writing). Like Michael replies in the comments, "When women outperform men on a cognitive test (for example, many language functions) it is because their brains are wired for better performance. When men outperform women on a cognitive test it is a discriminatory test.". The article makes no mention of these things and is thus merely more skewed soci…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter