Systemofwar Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Ex-wife (39F) is going homeless. Our 2 daughters (4F & 6F) are moving in with me (33M) but I refuse to let my ex-wife move in to my house. Not really, because you are throwing away you're critical thinking that completely erases the mans plight and ignore consequences for the mother's actions.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/05/22 10:51 PM
0	Ex-wife (39F) is going homeless. Our 2 daughters (4F & 6F) are moving in with me (33M) but I refuse to let my ex-wife move in to my house. Lmao you're a whipped bitch that's a slave to pussy.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/05/22 07:37 PM
1	Female dating strategy destroyed TBH I think it's a shitty situation either way. Say for example a man marries a woman, they build a life together but when they are older the man divorces in order to have a relationship with a younger woman. IMO a marriage should be a partnership and if part of that was one partner took the time to take care of the house and kids or whatever then it is an absolutely scummy thing to leave that person at a later age with nothing. I used a man and woman as an example because it's my understanding …	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/05/22 06:38 PM
5	“What’s wrong with you”? - woman after he is spit on in a pandemic. I honestly think I would ask who said that? And then spit on them.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/05/22 05:39 PM
2	Unmarried Ontario couple had no children and no house but man must still pay support, appeal court rules Yeah at that point you just hire those services lol	/r/MensRights	12/11/20 08:10 PM
1	Blakeowbebwb... what? Ok honestly though, this is third wave feminism at it’s finest That's the only part you addressed.	/r/MensRights	26/05/20 03:54 AM
0	Blakeowbebwb... what? Ok honestly though, this is third wave feminism at it’s finest Sure I don't have any police or military training but I do have a lot of real life experience navigating tense situations with volatile people. "How about dipshits like you not punch people if you don't want a response" Where did that come from? Was that what someone else said to you? Because I didn't advocate violence at all, as a matter of fact I did the complete opposite of that. I also didn't realize that me having an opinion also required me to be able to write an entire policy about it on …	/r/MensRights	26/05/20 03:12 AM
0	Blakeowbebwb... what? Ok honestly though, this is third wave feminism at it’s finest It's not tangential bs, I was just trying to establish that neither of us were talking about use of excessive force, laying out the boundaries of the argument as it were. And if you noticed I did say that in situations where you know whats going on and don't fear for your life. Equal response. It sounds like you're out of law enforcement and that makes me glad. IMO attitudes like your's are detrimental and only lead to an increase in injury and death. I'm not trying to say that you shouldn't def…	/r/MensRights	25/05/20 06:59 PM
0	Blakeowbebwb... what? Ok honestly though, this is third wave feminism at it’s finest That's horrible. I believe in controlled use of force - be it firearms or physical self-defense. Always de-escalate when you can and try to only use force if you have to. I assume you aren't advocating the use of excessive force so I don't think you are saying that you should keep hitting someone when they are down or to the point of hospitalization but I also don't think you should try to hurt or injure someone if it's unnecessary.	/r/MensRights	25/05/20 06:38 PM
-4	Blakeowbebwb... what? Ok honestly though, this is third wave feminism at it’s finest I agree but I also think that doesn't mean you should use your full force, at least not unless you are fearing for your safety. When I've gotten into situations where I've been the larger or stronger person and had the opportunity to consider what was happening. Twice I've just walked away from people who were pressured into fighting someone. *I just noticed the downvotes. Are you saying that in those situations I should have escalated and hurt someone? That I should have used physical violence …	/r/MensRights	25/05/20 04:50 PM
2	Australian feminist Clementine “Kill All Men” Ford doxes 14 year old boy who told her online to “put a shotgun in your [own] mouth”. I can tell by your speech that you aren't ready to champion the causes you claim to back.	/r/MensRights	12/05/20 06:02 PM
1	Only feminist Sources allowed I agree with you that most teachers wouldn't respond this way and are open to discussion and I agree that we can't confirm whether this is real or not but I will say that after the incidents in the past few years in several universities I believe that it could be real.	/r/MensRights	09/05/20 05:40 PM
1	"Toxic masculinity" is a female supremacist dog whistle Can you differentiate between the two? If toxic masculinity and toxic femininity exist and the both occupy the same areas (I.E. rape/molestation, physical abuse) then are they not basically the same thing? Why apply gender to it? I mean there really isn't anything that's tied to my gender that would make me do those things. That's something entirely different. Maybe socio/psychopathic tendencies or maybe something else. *Also don't think I didn't see you skip past the user that gave you a well t…	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 09:27 PM
1	"Toxic masculinity" is a female supremacist dog whistle OH burn! Normally I wouldn't say anything but that was just magical. You can just tell she didn't read it but I did. I aspire to present all arguments or differences of opinion in such a way.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 09:22 PM
1	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. No no I agree in that it's not really political but part of me understands why some people have the reactions they do.	/r/MensRights	13/08/19 03:30 PM
1	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. It's not political. You are exactly right, it is a mean joke on Twitter at a fat guy's expense. Now listen, I didn't post it but I believe I understand the reason it is political. In today's... society? I'm not sure the best word to describe it. Media presence, culture etc... If you say things that are considered "Politically incorrect" then you can be targeted by people on twitter, people on news, talk shows, youtube etc... This can often have severe repercussions such as being fired, blacklist…	/r/MensRights	13/08/19 02:09 AM
2	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. I disagree. She didn't call him fat, she made a stereotypical remark about the man's appearance that has a pretty negative connotation. It's pretty obvious she's made a sort of neck-beard reference. Any way you look at it, it isn't nice and it's uncalled for. And even if she was just drawing attention to the fact he is fat there is nicer ways of doing it. I'm not always the best at expressing myself so I can't quite find the words that I want but there is a difference in how you say something. A…	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 07:29 PM
2	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. It's great to know you either don't actually read what others write, which is part of my point about how you have preconceptions of who and what people are and what they are talking about and never bother to listen or your reading comprehension is terrible. Honestly the hypocrisy and irony in what you say is so immense, I'm surprised you don't fold beneath it.	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 05:41 PM
2	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. So you've made a few assumptions and lied or are purposefully ignorant, you have called me names and you are trying to cage me into what you want me to be. That's not a good way to engage in conversation nor make a good argument, so maybe you should stop doing that. There's lot's of comments that have said some unpleasant things about her, so no I'm not really lying. Great of you to accuse me though, especially when you can also read the same comments I am. I don't think this behavior is healthy…	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 05:32 PM
2	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. C'mon don't be ignorant. You know as well as I do exactly what she meant by that comment.	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 05:11 PM
2	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. Well I do agree that the scales (haha) are tipped slightly towards women's favor. It is generally less acceptable to call a women fat than a man. Not to say either is good except when it's necessary and usually it's nicer to say overweight.	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 04:24 PM
-1	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. I'm homing in on the people who have attitudes that are as bad if not worse than what they are attacking and questioning why. Especially if they are upset about what others are saying, why then add to it and say the same things? Why don't you tell me how that stuff helps? How any of the attacks against her are a good thing? She's ugly af, she aint no prize horse yadda yadda. None of that is constructive or helpful. It is the same thing that she (lady in the tweet) was doing. Yeah I think that's …	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 04:10 PM
4	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. In fairness trumps a fuckin' anomaly. I would have never guessed so many people would be ok with him as president just from what he says alone.	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 03:54 PM
-1	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. No and you are a moron. I did read through the comments on this post and I still back what I said. It's mindless because there is no thought behind it's just reactionary. There's no real thought to it, no ideas to improve or good discussion. Just 'Fuck that person!' in response to something they said or did. And often times it goes beyond that and the people posting here take it much further than the people they are attacking. I don't see many people that actually want to change things or make i…	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 03:52 PM
2	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. Is that the articles he wrote? Is that what he contributed?	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 03:25 PM
9	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. At least you recognize that. So many people don't and engage in the same behavior they are calling out.	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 03:21 PM
-6	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. Listen, I'm all for hating on people but a good portion of you are just mindlessly attacking someone while ignoring that you are doing the exact same thing that the lady in this article was doing. Do you actually want change and improvement? Or do you just want to satisfy yourselves for a short moment and say mean things about others? I don't see many people here that truly want equality, instead I see people who engage in the same behavior that you are attacking others for.	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 03:20 PM
1	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. How is that appropriate? You will never improve things by fighting fire with fire, you just burn everything down. Also what you said is kind of BS, do you have any proof of what you are saying? Can you prove there is a difference between male and female teachers? That one gender doesn't push an agenda while the other does?	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 03:17 PM
1	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. Then you should have included that in your first post. Honestly your comment was ignorant.	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 03:16 PM
14	Man who selflessly improves the internet is reduced to his appearance. See now you are doing exactly what they are doing.	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 03:11 PM
7	Fragile Femininity Because woman are more agreeable than men.	/r/MensRights	06/08/19 05:57 AM
11	Thought this belonged here 3.6 Billion. Woah.	/r/MensRights	08/07/19 06:47 PM
1	tattoo artist only serves females because “ men have everything “ Not that long ago there was a big deal about the barber who refused to cut a little girl's hair and people were out to skin him alive, why doesn't she get similar treatment.	/r/MensRights	05/07/19 01:27 PM
1	Sydney barber who refused to cut girls hair settles discrimination case \| Women-only gyms are legally protected, but a male barber who isn't trained to cut women's hair cannot refuse a demand that he do so. Ok so I can't go further back in the comment thread without manually searching for the thread (because I don't know how) so I am missing some of the context here. I re-read the article and I didn't see anything about a settlement, I couldn't tell if the article had been updated and removed that info etc.. and I am not going to research this any further because why. So I am working off certain assumptions. I will say this though, from what I can infer the previous assumption is that you are sayin…	/r/MensRights	27/10/18 08:31 AM
4	Sydney barber who refused to cut girls hair settles discrimination case \| Women-only gyms are legally protected, but a male barber who isn't trained to cut women's hair cannot refuse a demand that he do so. I imagine you would want something official written up by a professional. But a one time fee plus paper and ink for copies. The thing is though, who would ever think it necessary to sign a waiver for a haircut? I am not looking forward to the future where I have to sign for everything I do.	/r/MensRights	11/07/18 04:40 PM
5	Sydney barber who refused to cut girls hair settles discrimination case \| Women-only gyms are legally protected, but a male barber who isn't trained to cut women's hair cannot refuse a demand that he do so. Omg you tool. He settled because he couldn't afford the legal battle. The mom is a lawyer (This means she can represent herself and she doesn't have to pay for a lawyer). Fuck you're thick though. *I edited the parenthesis in because I'm not sure what your comprehension level is.	/r/MensRights	11/07/18 04:36 PM
5	England moving to only jail women for serious crimes. Well truly the book is a magnitude worse. It really is a good book that touches on a great variety of... questions? Ideas? Sometimes I'm not sure best how to describe them, and different people take different things from the book as well.	/r/MensRights	06/07/18 07:31 AM
14	In my opinion, this is a terrible opinion. We're both right. Context, environment and situation all play a huge part. I understand exactly what you are talking about as well. I would just generally say that our world is still pretty barbaric as a whole and more often than not for sheer physical size is used for aggression. Something something analogy between those people and animals.	/r/MensRights	01/07/18 04:55 PM
5	In my opinion, this is a terrible opinion. This* I mean in reality in all my experiences against aggressive women I usually just try to hold them off so I might not be worth what I say so to speak but I generally size up anyone who I think might be fighting and that means women are usually in the same boat as a small male. Not every dude is jacked or tough or whatever, and I have had plenty of physically weaker people step to me because you have be tough as a small person around here and because you'd think me an easy target from my laid…	/r/MensRights	01/07/18 04:41 PM
18	In my opinion, this is a terrible opinion. Depends on what side of the fence you're on. Around here bigger means you do/are going to be hitting others.	/r/MensRights	01/07/18 04:32 PM
2	Man write a well-reasoned opinion piece about not dating feminists. Predictably, every single comment is "you're so fat and ugly nobody would date you anyway". So only handsome men get an opinion? Omg, I thought you were kidding. I don't know why people behave like. I suppose maybe I don't like displaying my ignorance like everyone else does now.	/r/MensRights	11/09/16 08:27 AM