TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

T-rexTea Archive

View 1 post and 185 comments by T-rexTea on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Submission involves the loss of autonomy, or rather, as close to the loss of autonomy as can be consented. Your definition of 'intense sex' is probably what most vanilla folk think makes them kinky.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/15 10:17 PM
1

Check out James Deen's scenes. There's a reason girls love him.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 05:08 AM
3

That's what it may seem like to someone who didn't pass high school English..
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/15 05:33 PM
12

This might be it.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 01:08 AM
8

Disagreement is known as harassment in a feminist society, apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 10:19 PM
2

SJWs border on insanity. Posting personal info pertaining to a philosophy like TRP wouldn't be very wise, given the risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 01:28 AM
3

Exactly, completing ignoring the "passive dread" that your woman inflicts on your just for existing and being attractive displays that high level of confidence women crave. Agreed. This is referred to remaining stoic. Responding to this unintentional act of "passive dread" by internationally trying to inflict an even worse sense of dread on your SO through manipulation displays limp dick impotency and insecurity. Intentional or not, it's there. Many men simply don't know how to illicit unintenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 06:06 PM
5

So it's okay for passive dread to exist and be grossly unequal?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 05:58 PM
5

Are you saying that passive dread game is perfectly okay and men should just accept being trampled upon without a second thought?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 05:42 PM
5

Slavery was also deemed moral for a substantial portion of our history.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 05:38 PM
1

Existing is not playing mind games. It's cute that you think so. Social interaction is indeed a series of mind games. Open up a social psych textbook, and see for yourself. RPs have no clue what it's like for women in the dating world. Oh, I'm sorry that it's such an overwhelming burden to garner the attention of numerous possible mates.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 04:45 PM
0

YOU HORRENDOUS ABUSER! HOW DARE YOU DREAD HER INTO FORCING HER TO GIVE YOU HER BODY?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 04:31 PM
1

Social interaction consists of mind games. They merely exist within human nature. It seems like you don't like the idea of someone else having an advantage that comes to you naturally. That's understandable, but tough luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 04:25 PM
3

So mind games are okay as long as they're not intentional? Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 03:54 PM
4

Why is this bullshit? Is being a woman so goddamn difficult that by having an equal state of dread game with a partner, life becomes completely unfair?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 03:42 PM
4

OP's question is poorly phrased and perhaps missed the point. Just by having a vagina and not being the hambeastiest of hambeasts, a woman incites dread. The inequality of the sexual marketplace demonstrates this vividly. Not only bloopers see it as okay, but the rest of society does as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 03:22 PM
6

Women are accustomed to that passive dread without even knowing it. That is the point. Male dread game just evens the playing field.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 03:12 PM
11

Bingo. The main problem bloopers seem to be having is acknowledging passive dread. They conflate nonaction and fairness, with 'intent' being the end all be all of evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 03:10 PM
3

See http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2vmmjv/tbp_why_is_it_ok_for_women_to_dread_game_men_and/coj98ad
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 03:05 PM
5

There is intentional and nonintentional dreading. The former is called dread game. Without dread game, men are heavily outmatched by the nonintentional female dreading merely due to the sociosexual climate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 03:05 PM
4

Then multiply that by 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/15 04:30 AM
1

All of a sudden, everyone in this thread has a Psy.D. and can predict and wholly understand the nature of the situation? A bunch of pretentious fucks, really. OP, I can't tell you the exact dynamics of a patient and therapist relationship, but it seems that there's a disconnect between the treatment and the person in this case. It's not like she's treating some marital problem of yours.
/r/askTRP25/01/15 07:25 PM
1

You can change your nature. It's hard as fuck. Just go look at what goes on in /r/TheRedPill when men try to change themselves. Additionally, it seems you are fairly aware of your dominant role, so it'd be a 180 compared to a woman who's more in between, that'd of course make it much more difficult. It'd be easier with a firm understanding of CBT or MCT, but nevertheless, a pain.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 04:41 AM
3

It cannot be as instant as you claim. It does seem logical, but the emotional weight is still there. They end up waning off of it. How do you think a woman would react to a revelation of a similar magnitude? More rationally, or less?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 04:28 AM
6

Men are not robots, they cannot simply choose to not experience an emotion. You really are grasping at straws here....
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 04:25 AM
1

It probably won't, however, being bedridden is a more neutral turn of events than trying to turn the dynamic around. You're creating rather artificial conditions for a female dom. The relationship already has a certain momentum that likely won't change, thus rendering your test null. Although, your partner may see you in a different light, since these things are rather instinctual, and that may result in an unpleasant outcome. A tenet of an RPW is that she is naturally submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 04:22 AM
5

I'm a female dominant sexually, but I've received more than one lecture on the subject that I'm only being allowed to do this (as opposed to RPW who don't have any choice?) but while he is a switch, I initiate about 99% of the sex. I'm also more likely to be the dynamic "planner" in our relationship You're creating a power vacuum since your partner clearly doesn't have the balls an RPW seeks. Approach situation with caution.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 04:02 AM
5

If you kill his dog, even the most levelheaded man will experience a phase of intense emotion. The blooper straw man that TRP claims men are flawlessly rational robots is getting old.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 03:59 AM
-3

25 participants is an acceptable amount if you consider statistical significance. You may want to pick up a statistics book instead of reading Wikipedia on the matter...actually, Wikipedia should've brought that up, so I have not a clue where you're getting your dose of ignorance from.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 10:52 PM
2

If you're the partner bringing back the money, it is expected the the partner who stays at home takes care of everything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 10:19 PM
0

Most transactions are zero sum. Someone's going to get the shit end of the stick. TRP is about strategy making sure that someone isn't you. As I said, both sides are abusive. Some abuse may be necessary to get what you want and reach an optimal outcome. Let's not call it abuse due to the extremely negative connotation, just think of it as compromise. You do what your partner wants you to do, and in exchange, they stay with you. Seems like an equal exchange. No one is being pressured into anythin…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 06:44 PM
3

9 is a meaningless platitude spewed by a one-trick pony. It's like every feminist is given a script when they sign up. "something something entitled. something something consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 06:26 PM
1

Ah, there's your problem. Stop spending your time being offended by every worldly occurrence and lrn2engrish. Abuse this, abuse that. Cry me a fucking river.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 06:16 PM
-1

Life is a series of microabuses and selfishness on everyone's part. Being disinterested in sex is a form of abuse in the sense that you're withholding what your partner wants. That's life. Abuse happens. From all genders and from all people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 06:14 PM
5

Almost there. Now read the definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 06:09 PM
3

The position of paid servant is infinitely better than that of permanently indentured servant.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 06:02 PM
0

Google 'intent'. You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 05:56 PM
-8

Beating your wife sober is abuse. Getting drunk and doing it, isn't? Alright.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 05:51 PM
2

You're trading dinner for sex, and even that is dubious as she could be looking for validation and a free meal. Are you sure you're red?
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 05:43 PM
56

Every point is as important as the last.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 06:39 PM
0

Reframe the statement. From a purely objective viewpoint, who is the better mate, one who can't handle his shit and ends up an emotional mess, or someone who has all of his shit handled and doesn't dump all of his emotional baggage on his partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 05:35 PM
6

Scientifically disproven? Show us your sources, bub.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/14 04:06 PM
9

A great personality doesn't get me hard.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/14 02:10 AM
2

If you don't know how to take precautions as well as sleep with disgusting (wo)men, there's little that can be done in your case.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 02:02 AM
4

Double standards are perfectly fine across different individuals. A woodworker is held to a different standard than a metallurgist, etc... If women don't care about a man's promiscuity, why should men do the same about women if they're clearly judging her with a wholly different system? Do you think men judge a woman by the car she drives or her annual salary?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 07:55 PM
0

It doesn't matter whether you're merely hamstering or trying to be contrarian for the purpose of getting your point across, but the fact of the matter is that the majority of women aren't like you. This makes your special snowflake opinion irrelevant. Women are more socially oriented and have a Bloodhound's nose for sniffing social status. The more promiscuous the guy has allowed himself to be, the more social proof of his worthiness he emits.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 07:51 PM
2

No. Look at gymnasts' bodies.
/r/askTRP24/11/14 09:02 AM
1

Results: Expensive piss.
/r/askTRP04/11/14 05:33 PM
7

Sums it up.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:52 PM
4

The style works for creative writing. Not so much for the informative kind.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:09 AM
3

They are. As long as the cock belongs to a high SMV man.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/14 09:21 PM
1

Paraphilias are heavily correlated with all kinds of mental disease and less than ideal traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 02:51 PM
1

The type of women in SM relationships aren't exactly the cream of the crop, and likely have a slew of their own mental issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/14 02:33 AM
3

As global warming increases, rape decreases. GREAT SCOTT, WE ARE ONTO SOMETHING
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 01:19 AM
2

Said every feminist ever. Has it never occurred to you that rapists are very much aware of all of those things but simply don't give a fuck and merely take advantage because they want to and/or believe they can get away with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 01:18 AM
14

Consult a fucking PT.
/r/askTRP06/10/14 05:30 PM
4

The larger a subreddit gets, the more the average IQ falls, and the more misunderstandings of the philosophy occur.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 06:16 PM
3

What about...three Great Danes?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/14 09:01 PM
0

TBP: Idealistic childish naiveté. Oh, those were the days...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/14 02:49 PM
16

She was drunk, so it's cool.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 02:47 PM
1

Gee, pal, we've tuned into revelation station over here.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 03:57 AM
5

Except that illiteracy can be amended.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/14 07:39 PM
1

Yes, USC included. As well as a myriad of other universities.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 05:42 PM
5

Well, a good amount of the best universities in the country/world are in California.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 02:13 PM
6

It's not about being open-minded, it's about acknowledging the fact that he's with two women of low enough value to actually accept the polygynous arrangement.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 01:18 PM
17

An ape is defined by a certain branch of the taxonomic tree, which we are very much a part of.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 03:06 AM
17

We're already being fucked by it. If Hillary is elected, the strap-on will merely protract its spikes.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 12:16 AM
1

Very few interactions are not zero-sum, meaning that there is a loser almost every time, no matter how minor. This is why I enjoy reading Red Pill-like material, it acknowledges the reality of human interaction. And no two TRPer will have the same desires. The one commonality in all of TRP is the fact that we don't want to lose.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 05:18 AM
-1

Worrying about someone's well-being is indeed part of morality. Once again, say it with me, sa-tire. He's condoning none of it. If you find a TRPer who'd smash someone's things, abuse her pets, or display weapons, let me know, because I'd like to stay away from that asshole. - see, that's me displaying my morality, which is NOT what TRP is about. Life is one giant grey area where some 'abuses' aren't acknowledged to be abuses by all. Life is one giant Machiavellian game. You try to maximize gain…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 04:57 AM
3

It IS pure morality. If you want to discuss that, you go to /r/morality, /r/ethics, or even /r/philosophy. TRP discusses strategy. Where do you see harm coming from TRP? The article you linked is satire sprinkled with truth. He's making fun of the graphic. I don't see him condoning any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 04:30 AM
-1

There is no consensus on what's moral and what's immoral in TRP. At all. Strategy is discussed, not the moral ramifications. Some TRPers want a wife who's loyal and to remain loyal in kind, others want to spin plates problem-free.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 03:38 AM
-1

Think of it as a means to an end. Take biology for example, you can work on developing a superbug or you can study oncology to help save lives. Neither of these routes make biology good or evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 02:50 AM
-1

You may have heard this uttered before: TRP is amoral. Just because certain things work, doesn't make them moral or immoral - and even so, TRP isn't concerned with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 02:34 AM
4

With those ranges, you can easily say humans have a similar range of muscular dimorphism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 05:20 PM
3

What are the stats for the other apes? It still grants us a completely dominating position over women. Male on male physical aggression is lower, however.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 02:22 PM
3

A) Completely wrong. 98% of the genome is not responsible for 'when' genes get made. It is argued that about 15% is functional DNA, the 2% consists merely of genes coding for proteins. Also, of that 15%, ALL of it is clearly not epigenetic in nature. Much of it serves as a framework for exactly how the genes are represented and produced. B) If you haven't read a scientific journal in the last 200 years, then I suppose you wouldn't be familiar with the heritability measure biologists use. Genetic…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 01:37 PM
1

Not only do men have roughly 150% the muscle of a woman, their muscle consistency results in the present muscle being 10% stronger. This sounds incredibly dimorphic. I wouldn't even need to know this as a scientific fact to say that...have you interacted with women? They are as weak as sin. They admit it. Even the strong ones can barely compete with average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 01:16 PM
6

Everything on the Internet is undeniably real, obviously.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 03:32 AM
1

Because the kid wouldn't be related to him.
/r/askTRP18/09/14 09:37 PM
1

Welfare programs ensure you stay alive, no matter the amount of debt you're in.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 08:44 PM
0

May be the case. But anger is a state of abhorrence for the status quo. Some TRPers merely choose to ignore it, while others care more about the health of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 04:00 PM
1

wat no. I'm genuinely curious what TRP thinks about this.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 03:54 PM
2

And in tbe 50s and 60s, feminism was about actual women's rights. Things have obviously changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 02:44 PM
-14

And TRP suggests women be stay at home mothers, right? So if the man works, and the woman stays at home, by default, the woman is raising the child the majority of the time. edit: Not sure about the downvotes. I asked a question and some of you got butthurt.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 07:00 PM
0

Here you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 08:58 PM
11

BP was created as a sardonic circlejerk, without any desire of discourse being present, and that's what's mimicked on PPD. Purplepillers are the ones who actually subscribe to exchanging ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 05:04 PM
5

Right, joining a community and sharing discourse clearly means RP principles don't work. It seems you're on the Internet complaining about it because you know it does work, and can't reconcile as to why with your current naive view of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 04:35 PM
11

"You can also buy me dinner, to make it feel like a real date."
/r/trpGAME10/09/14 04:31 PM
3

Fantastically analyzed. The reality of the situation is depressing. The modern climate has had absolutely horrid effects on women as autonomous and rational agents.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 08:46 PM
1

Dangerously fucking with your brain chemistry is desperate and not red pill. At all. If you can't put in the effort and have to resort to wasting money on magical supplements, you have yet to swallow the pill(the metaphorical one).
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 09:36 PM
4

I thought the PC terminology was 'cum dumpster'...
/r/askTRP05/09/14 04:17 PM
4

The irony is hilarious. Feminists are the ones who claim to be the most sexually liberated, yet are the ones who wish to be used like sluts....in the bedroom. At least Catharine MacKinnon(megafem) remained consistent of her argument that pornography = subjugation.pdf warning There must be hamster food in the water nowadays.
/r/askTRP05/09/14 03:55 PM
3

At least she drew the line at only one dick in the sphincter.
/r/askTRP05/09/14 03:45 PM
20

Gotta love what the modern kink community has become; feminism come full circle. "I'm not a slut, and please don't call me one. However, treat me like one, because I fucking love it."
/r/askTRP05/09/14 03:39 PM
3

Nah, just a tad introverted. To me, there really is no purpose of an identity outside of social context. That's just like, my chillosophy, man.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 04:21 AM
1

Introversion is self-obsession? Way to jump across an entire ocean to reach an unlikely conclusion.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 04:19 AM
1

2nd one is extroverts. Should've been obvious.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 04:13 AM
1

That too. But it's funny when social studies or neuroscientific studies are brought up and you get an influx of "This is why women...blah blah blah something inferior." I'm assuming there are loads of angsty teenagers in the TRP sub.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 07:01 PM
1

Possibly every single point regarding female inferiority. The hamstering redpillers do to justify their actions - interpreting research to further their own agenda. Most economic theory spewed on here.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 06:53 PM
0

A poster in this thread summed it up: http://www.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/2fd2fy/what_are_some_major_flaws_in_trp/ck82jtr
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:57 PM
2

TRP isn't a normative philosophy, it's amoral. You get what you desire, and the consequences of said action are of little concern. If you're looking to improve society, you study sociology, not TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/14 04:55 PM
5

By that logic, all of TRP is a massive rationalization. An identity is not my concern. That identity will die on the same day that I will. It's a worthless resource to be attached to. you need to look in the mirror, man up, say fuck this mind game and trow yourself into horrifying situations, because that is how you grow What you're describing is textbook shyness, not introversion. but if you don't want to because of a cognitive limitation you are shooting yourself in the foot Be it a physiologi…
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:47 PM
-1

Every other post is chock-full with content or comments illustrating women's 'inferiority'. Many facets of dreadgame cross ethical boundaries which you wouldn't apply to your interaction with another male. The whole traditional roles of stay at home wifes are spewed like there's no tomorrow. All in all, I like the philosophy, but hate how some men apply it. Reeks of bitterness.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:25 PM
0

Nitpicking and ignorantly tailoring tenets of a philosophy to fit their existing world view isn't all that uncommon of people. Ironically, adding this brutalized philosophy to their initial beliefs, strengthens those beliefs.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:14 PM
8

This is why I'm a red-piller. Unfortunately, there's also a lot of bitter sexism that comes along with accepting reality for many. It's like they're still being sold on some fairy tale life which they'll never get.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:11 PM
-4

Normative sexism based on pseudoscience.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:09 PM
7

Being an introvert and being an asshole aren't mutually exclusive, never have been. Yes, the brain can model and simulate reality - to an extent that makes reality completely inseparable from the model.(shouldn't this be an argument FOR living in your head? lol) Being introverted means that you're merely on one side of a spectrum, it doesn't mean you're a complete recluse. Introverts, myself included, can spend plenty of time extroverting sans anxiety, however, after a certain threshold of extro…
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:04 PM
17

Social awkwardness and shyness are not introversion. Sure, there may be some correlation, but that's it. Introversion originates in the brain. Arousal theory states that introverts have a lower baseline of stimuli needed for arousal as opposed to extroverts. The regulation of autonomic systems is also different between introverts and extroverts in the sense that they share different quantities of certain receptors. I am an introvert, you can disbelieve all you want, but that's the reality of the…
/r/askTRP03/09/14 02:29 PM
3

Not exactly. The male imperative is similar to that of the female: To ensure the maximal genetic legacy. From there on, there is an infinite amount of strategies to adopt. Examples: Taking care of siblings or siblings' progeny. Sleeping with as many people as possible/infidelity. Monogamy. Polygamy. And many more with various modifications of the aforementioned strategies.
/r/askTRP30/08/14 11:19 PM
0

That's average height. Who wants to be dating 'average'?
/r/askTRP22/08/14 06:04 PM
1

It's a smart thing to do, sure. But does an intelligent person need help adapting to reality? I'd be hesitant to agree.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 04:00 AM
82

The parent comment of the girl who claims to be an "intelligent hot chick" is funnyhilarious. Long winded, yes. I apologize. I've had more than a decade to deal with these things, and sometimes I feel like I am behind other people because I relied on my looks for so long. I am petrified of getting old and unattractive. That's a big thing I am working through in therapy right now. So, this intelligent woman needs therapy to accept the decline of her social value. *slow clap*
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 05:26 PM
9

A retard with an axe poses more harm than a lumberjack with an axe.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/14 10:24 PM
-2

The comments in this post are proving that men are no different than women in this regard.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 04:22 PM
2

I recently listened to Manson's Models on audiobook. I'd recommend it.
/r/askTRP09/07/14 04:21 AM
2

Forget vows, it's an unspoken social contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 10:47 PM
2

Not an analogy, you're literally addicted to her in a biochemical sense.
/r/askTRP02/07/14 09:59 PM
1

He may have been guilded 25 times, but TRP has got over half a grand of new subscribers.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:10 PM
5

You don't have the wrong idea, the OP described a warped caricature of this sub often portrayed in /r/shitredditsays, /r/thebluepill, and every other subreddit. It is likely he has never read anything even near the length of his long tirade against TRP.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 08:14 PM
26

The influx of new users seem to be smarter than OP.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 07:32 PM
4

It isn't in anyone's best interest to convince you. Look at the sidebar of TRP and decide for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 04:01 AM
1

I didn't consider the China tidbit, but once again, nonskilled labor, while not useless, isn't integral.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 10:49 PM
1

No, men aren't really superior; the question is overly simplified. In terms of what I believe is most beneficial for society and who facilitates these things, men is the clear answer. Other than that, I can't really say.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 10:20 PM
2

Alright, let me know when these college grads start making an actual difference. Anything along the lines of successful startups, novel research, feats of engineering..whatever your naive little heart desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 07:10 PM
0

I'm talking about current trends and what is. Not your imagined femutopia.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 06:54 PM
1

They're also almost solely responsible for every single technological advancement in the history of our species.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 06:48 PM
1

Taking care of a healthy child doesn't have the same emotional sink which comes with the sick and elderly relative. In fact, it's often a joyous task. There's societal value and then there's personal value - personal value isn't relevant to an objective question of superiority. Is working in a mine more difficult than raising a child?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 06:22 PM
2

You're citing emotional difficulty as an example? Disconnecting from your job is very common. Taking care of an elderly relative is an inessential part of society. If the relative expires, nothing of worth is lost on the whole - in fact, the resources they would've soaked up are gained(including your labor).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 05:57 PM
1

Do you believe that the social maintenance positions are on the whole more or less difficult? Maybe in the past, they were mandatory - but now, resources are a plenty and the ancient dynamic is a vestige.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 05:33 PM
2

These maintenance positions aren't indispensable. You don't need years of education or experience to do them well. You can arguably pull a bum of the street and have him administer those tasks with relative ease. You can easily adapt society to fill in for the maintenance.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 05:22 PM
2

This should not be perceived as a misogynistic answer, but mainly a pragmatic one given the context of how the world currently works. Get rid of one sex, and see what happens. If either sex was removed, humanity would die off eventually(not considering the possibility of sperm banks and the production of more males in the female case). It doesn't take a genius to imagine the absolute chaos that would ensue if males disappeared. If women disappeared, there'd be a collective 'meh' and an increase …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 04:53 PM
-1

Unsubstantiated conjecture. Aside from popping out babies and raising them (poorly), what is their current role in society which prevents the burning of the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 04:44 PM
3

Ask a simple question, get a simple answer: Yes Look at the world around you and observe the gears that make it run.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 03:55 PM
2

This is what happens when society continuously lets women get away with this shit. What works best is simply calling them out on it. That's what I've done with my female friends. At first, they get pissy, but eventually, down the line, they gain some fucking agency and wind up thanking me for calling them out on their shit.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/14 09:01 PM
1

Although it may seem logical to try and get past that since the beta she cheated on is no longer you, that's mere rationalization. She will always see you as the guy she cheated on. Plate her or next her.
/r/askTRP25/06/14 04:20 PM
3

/r/fitness /r/bodyweightfitness /r/gainit
/r/askTRP20/06/14 06:44 PM
11

Reading through further posts, that woman seems like poison. Slow, suffocating, miserable, poison.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 03:00 PM
1

Most pathetic thing I've seen in a few weeks, actually.
/r/trpGAME19/06/14 05:32 AM
2

'Impractical' in terms of what? It's kind of our biological imperative, ya kno...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/14 06:36 PM
7

So....the guy would need a valid reason for you to consider him.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 02:44 AM
-3

So aside from physical variation, there's no difference between men and women?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 01:00 AM
4

If you're going to talk about the difference between two sexes, then yes, evolution is an absolutely mandatory talking point. Both sexes have the procreational drive, however, given the different physiological systems they've evolved with, their strategies for survival and mating must suit their physiology. This should be as clear as day to anyone who's familiar with biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 12:59 AM
32

Great story, man. But aside from a 'forced' blowjob, it won't serve in most other cases of false rape allegations.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 08:32 PM
1

A few minute orientation to riding is usually sufficient, and then adjust as you go. If she's not certifiably retarded, there shouldn't be an issue. Good ground rules: 1) No sudden movements. 2) Lean as I do. 3) Don't put your weight on me.
/r/askTRP07/06/14 01:17 AM
1

I've ridden bikes for 7 years, the last one being a Daytona 675. I don't intend to kill myself or any of the passengers I have on it. As for SMV, yeah, I agree with you on that - but you have got to know how to utilize it.
/r/askTRP06/06/14 09:58 PM
2

It's too dangerous to have passengers on a motorcycle? What the fuck are you smoking? Brush it off. It doesn't matter what manlet Freddie Mercury said.
/r/askTRP06/06/14 07:56 PM
-4

Someone with your arguments shouldn't be allowed outside of a padded room. Just sayin'.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/14 06:29 PM
1

My response to am_thro_way is relevant: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/257uy9/ppd_is_it_wrong_for_women_to_dress_for_men/chg46f3 You responded to a question with a childish answer, completely side-stepping the point. The evident mental conflict would be your inability to reconcile the reasons for your actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/14 06:11 PM
1

People dress for three different reasons(with obvious overlap): For utility, social value, and sexual value. If a women is dressing provocatively, she's doing it for the sake of her sexual value, and maybe the social value among her girlfriends. It has always irritated me when women say "I dress for myself". Well, no shit, Sherlock, you do everything for yourself. You also make money for yourself and get laid for yourself. I'm at a point where I'm more accepting of these shit-for-brains response…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/14 06:05 PM
0

See response: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/257uy9/ppd_is_it_wrong_for_women_to_dress_for_men/chfjqo0
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/14 12:25 AM
0

Rationalization Hamster- The tendency for women to use rationalization to resolve mental conflict and avoid cognitive dissonance. The core mechanism that allows women to say one thing and do a different thing. Pointing out the obvious sprinkled with tautology, along with a futile "I DO WHAT I WANTT" style of debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/14 12:25 AM
0

Of course, the event or activity matters. There's still some style sense involved. You'd never catch me in plaid shorts and a striped shirt.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/14 12:02 AM
5

Not quite. If it didn't affect my sexual/social status, I'd be wearing yesterday's sweats and a tie-dye shirt. On the contrary, you are the one projecting your insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/14 08:58 PM
4

If you think it's a viable argument, make it. However, I think it is silly to equate something tentative like financial power to gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 02:41 PM
6

Usually, their beta orbiters are lining up to polish her shit with their tongues.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 12:23 AM
13

To me, 'equal rights' are simplistic buzzwords used to rally the masses with as much ease as possible. Should female rights be as important as male ones? Certainly. Both sides should openly and rationally fight for what's best for them as a group. What's best for one side can oftentimes be what's best for the other side - sometimes, it won't, and that's where compromise comes in. Feminism uses the facade of equality to shit all over men's rights and create a poisonous environment for both partie…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 04:16 PM
16

Pulled from dictionary.com. Doesn't get any more clearcut than this: 1. the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men. Women form different social hierarchies than men, women have a different process of sexual selection from men, women are physiologically/neuroanatomically different from men. Men and women are not equal. In what kind of pipe-dream do you declare two very separate entities equal? What species in the animal kingdom even comes close …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 03:34 PM
1

I'd say exercise...but c'mon. Though, bodyweight fitness is certainly more entertaining than lifting weights, as I build muscle and do all kinds of cool tricks(handstands, one-armed pull ups, planches, levers). Basketball and hiking are my cardio. Archery - it's meditative as fuck and makes me feel like a paleolithic hunter. It's also immensely technical(no where as easy, but 100x more rewarding that shooting a gun). Back of steel, yo. Motorcycling - I've been riding for 6 years now and commutin…
/r/askTRP03/05/14 09:42 PM
5

Fantastic response, newcomers to TRP definitely need to see this. Out of curiosity, what ailments did stress cause for you?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 07:48 PM
7

Here is a depiction of women's bf%. http://cdn.builtlean.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/body-fat-percentage-women.jpg Women carry fat very differently from men. As you can see 30% can still be rather fit without approaching the grotesque qualities of most of the pictures you posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/14 02:27 PM
1

When it comes to scoping out a partner for a functional LTR, definitely. For fucking around, there lies a similar yet different set of criteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:27 AM
2

No, it's my own gauge. The type of woman a guy is able to pull without using deceptive game says a lot about where he stands on the social hierarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:16 AM
2

It's a very precise gauge of my social standing. TRP ideals garner a certain kind of respect from both men and women. It allows me to do the things I want, how I want. It gives me stability and control. Sex becomes a minor attraction in the scheme things. But it certainly doesn't hurt banging the tight-bodied yoga instructor or the gym rat.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:01 AM
7

TRP concedes that alphas are the born naturals, which most of us aren't. A large facet of TRP is in consciously acquiring alpha traits to build sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:43 AM
2

The red pill means different things for different people. Each one of us still has our own personal preferences. For me, sex isn't ALWAYS worth the trouble, but being confident that you can get it at a moment's notice is a great feeling.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:39 AM
2

At least your snarkiness understands reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 02:13 PM
7

If it wasn't for all of that poorly directed vitriol, I would've never found this place. My thanks goes to them.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 10:16 PM
1

learned uselessness* more like. And dependence.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 10:11 PM
2

Remember, progeny is generally important. The other parent need not be. The alphas in the list you provided a) get the pick of the litter b) continuously fuck other women on the side. This is in stark contrast to the common modern day marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 06:27 PM
1

Men also have expectations of women, which when not met, result in a loss of 'love'. The expectations are indeed different, but the concept endures. Men will continue loving a woman who gets fat and loses her job. As you said, men and women are different. You cannot hold one to the same standard as the other.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 06:02 PM
3

Firstly, in response to your initial comment, patriarchy is the default social structure in the majority of known animals, there is nothing inherently evil about it and likely has little to do with the 'injustices' feminism seeks to fix. As /u/SolidSolution pointed out, men are also deemed desirable or not based on certain characteristics, so in this regard, we are in fact equal. Many feminists/bluepillers have a problem accepting the harsh reality of there being calculable desirable traits that…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 05:23 PM
3

TRP isn't concerned with what aught to be, but with what is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:41 PM
2

/r/seduction
/r/askTRP22/04/14 03:19 AM
4

If you don't disturb the kraken for a week, T-levels jump 50% and then decrease back to baseline. So if you're looking to increase gains, lift 7 days after spanky time. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12659241?dopt=Abstract edit: Actually, no, you're not a woman. Continue lifting throughout the week, pussy.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 10:59 PM
1

It's naive to believe that the optimal physique for health is the one that is strived for in TRP.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 03:24 PM
1

The physiological consequence of being provided x amount of things on the OP's list can usually be defined as 'love'. That's not dissimilar to how men love. Being unreasonably audacious about women not being able to love is misogynistic garbage that serves to polarize redpill ideas even further - perhaps that's the intent. IMO, it'd serve men more if the ideas were presented in a more levelheaded and realistic manner.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 04:29 AM
2

I'm still swallowing the redpill and even in my more blue days, subs like /r/thebluepill and /r/shitredditsays have always been comedically pathetic to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/14 07:15 PM
1

You can't assume anything due to the obvious sampling biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/14 06:52 AM
1

Bluepill, as in the opposite of redpill, not some misguided SJW on /r/thebluepill
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/14 06:40 AM
1

What was the point of that strawman?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 11:05 PM
-5

It's posts like these that make redpillers seem like misogynistic sociopaths.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 03:28 PM
7

Rosalind Franklin was instrumental in deciphering DNA's structure.
/r/askTRP17/04/14 05:39 PM
0

Blog-spamming....not cool.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 03:55 PM
6

The wheels are spinning in the comments section.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 05:18 AM
5

Let me guess, he describes himself as a 'nice guy'? They're prone to the same bouts of rationalization as hamsters.
/r/askTRP09/04/14 04:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter