TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

T1redOfSleep Archive

View 4 posts and 63 comments by T1redOfSleep on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Population of men in the US in 2010 was approximately 151.8 million according to the national census. 1 in 72 would equate to 2.1 million. I think your school applied national statistics to world male population (3.3 billion).
/r/MensRights07/02/19 03:24 AM
111

Had he done anything while drunk, he would be held fully accountable. But if women do anything while drunk, they are free of all accountability except for the crime of letting themselves get drunk. A perversion of justice.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:30 PM
11

"Strict one-punch laws" made me think there was more than one, but I only found the same single law you did.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:26 PM
1

I was wondering the same thing. The article made it sound like officers were being trained to ask more open-ended questions, which I consider a good thing. It also sounded like they were pushing for more involvement from trauma staff from hospitals in court. Also a good thing. More facts and better resources. Officer's believing the accuser is where I have a problem, particularly detectives. Believing anybody or choosing any side compromises the case. When Boardman told the accuser, "you're stro…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:42 AM
5

And some of those people dont deserve to ever see the light of day again.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 05:08 PM
13

SOME liberals. Please quit straw-manning an entire group and then accusing that group of wrongfully doing the same thing. Many men (and women) here are liberal, don't believe Kavanaugh is guilty of rape, and some may even support his appointment. Don't assume shit simply because of one's political affiliation, lest ye be judged, attacked, berated, fired, alienated, or killed for yours. Political affiliation shouldn't mean a damn thing in an egalitarian meritocracy.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:21 PM
5

Actually found this while trying to understand the r/againstMensRights viewpoint. I was curious about a genders reversed scenario on two different plains. This has been posted before but by a supposive anti-MRM with a different agenda. First, if the perpetrator were female, particularly would the "unlawful seizure" be thrown out and would the potential years behind bars be adjusted? Second, if the victims were female, particularly would more charges be pressed. Currently there are only 7 charges…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:06 PM
0

Just to clarify, far-left. Additionally, far-right and similar respective groups use equally dehumanizing ad hominems. Shoot, even saw feminazi in this thread. See also "libtard," "entitled brats," and "snowflakes." Trying to politicize social events alienates half the men's rights group. In order to keep the conversation relevant, please refrain from politically affiliated attacks and associations in the future. Thanks.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:20 AM
11

Paywall. :(.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 12:40 PM
0

R/legal advice for the legal aspect. Most importantly, please dont relinquish any of your rights to your child based on her promises. Document all frivolous requests to present to the deciding judge to expose that she is manipulative whereas you've been nothing but cooperative. Additionally, as an international, buy and where a U.S. Flag lapel pin to garner sympathy from not only the judge, but also from your ex's lawyer. It pulls unconscious bias in your favor as long as you dont directly draw …
/r/MensRights09/11/18 11:58 PM
4

Thanks!
/r/MensRights07/11/18 10:13 PM
1

Lobster_fest made no political references in his/her claim. Republicans, whether or not that includes you, should not feel personally attacked based of his/her opinions on a specific government official. Your defense of Kavanaugh seemed unbiased, but labeling of Lobster_fest shows an you have an obvious party allegiance bias that should not occur in an objective argument. And you're right, Men's Rights is for everybody. Ad hominem attacks have no place here. Telling other men to unsub because th…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 08:57 PM
1

This is Colorado, USA
/r/MensRights02/11/18 02:17 PM
3

EDIT: nor* men's* cancer screenings nor* family planning for men*.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:15 PM
2

In this sense, you're correct. "Growth" was maybe the wrong word. Probably should have used a term such as "self-reliance" or "proper planning." The jacket is just one instance of developed reliance, though. I was trying to speak in a general sense, as in "you wouldn't give up your entire savings for somebody who blew all their money on frivolous pursuits the day they received their paycheck" or "...give up give up your promotion at a job for somebody far less qualified simply because they're a …
/r/MensRights29/10/18 10:30 AM
0

Agreed. No option here is inherently cruel so long as it's a choice rather than an obligation. Self-sacrifice is admirable, as is inspiring growth, and every combination of the two. I would gladly jump in front of a bullet for a loved one, but I'd be darned if I were to be pushed in front of a bullet for a loved one.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 07:24 AM
36

No qualms, brother. You're not a bad person if you give her your jacket. You're not a bad person if you don't. You're not a bad person if you accept her jacket when you're cold. She's not a bad person if she won't lend it to you. The point is that your GF and you define y'all's relationship, not some stranger's creed of obligatory self-sacrifice by all males for every female. Nobody should be able to force you to do anything you don't want to do (opinion: unless it prevents you from actively cau…
/r/MensRights29/10/18 06:56 AM
36

Truth (last paragraph). The only problem I have is that when men are so pressured into sacrificing everything for others that there is no room for men to love themselves. Selflessness is not inherently good (e.g. slavery) just as selfishness is not inherently bad (e.g. seeking outside help for personal struggles with suicidal thoughts even though it may inconvenience those whom you open yourself up to).
/r/MensRights29/10/18 02:43 AM
278

If he doesn't give up his jacket, she's cold once and will remember hers next time. If he gives up his jacket for her, she never learns and he establishes a pattern that makes him cold every time or face being regarding as an asshole based off precedence. Real men can tell the difference between momentary pleasure and a lifetime of prosperity, and rightfully choose the latter. Real women can rightfully accept and carry the consequences of their actions, like the woman here. It's not gender-biase…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 11:46 PM
21

Is this 1984 or Animal Farm?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 02:40 AM
3

Thanks, bot! Don't know how that got past my autocorrect. :)
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:17 AM
21

It took me a while to realize that this might have had something to do with clothing. Knowing a lot of male custruction laborers, industrial mechanics, handymen, and landscapers who are out sweating their butts off while their office counterparts are almost always exclusively female constantly complaining about the climate control, too hot or too cold, I originally thought this could have been this woman recognizing she has a clear beneficial arrangement in comparison. Edit: changed 'privilege' …
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:14 AM
1

Gender was omitted from that part of the sentence, between "despite" and "vastly."
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:38 PM
3

Term could be referring to the type of bomb in WWII that could level an entire city block with a single explosive. This case is definitely a huge change of perspective.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 02:47 PM
19

When you don't enforce the rules, you are telling the children that women are exempt from the law. By all means, this is an equally destructive message.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 11:51 PM
2

Do as Jordan Peterson tries to do and be very careful with your words. For example, avoid labels. Do not label the people as liars as that is an attack on character. Instead, try saying that they are telling lies or that the basis of their argument is superfluously misinformed, which is an attack on the words and actions. More succinctly, try to attack and counter verbs, never nouns. It's the same advice given to young parents raising children.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:45 AM
3

Don't report unless your life is in danger, because at that point the jail cell you receive is the better option. It's also the only (perceived) time anyone will take you seriously as a male victim. /opinion. However, times are changing... I hope.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 12:47 AM
39

His name and phone number. Future relationships and jobs will be effected in addition to the relationships already damaged by the distribution of the nonconsensual illicit photo to people he knew. I hope the verdict gets widely published in an effort to deter similar acts.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 03:50 PM
7

First, spread awareness. Posting here was a good start. I certainly didn't know about this subject matter. Gain support from more publicly identifiable members. They will spread the word around and up. Increase the number of circles in which the discussion is taking place, too. The more it's talked about, the less it can be ignored.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 10:05 PM
3

Hey, I like your tie. :)
/r/MensRights11/10/17 04:12 PM
15

Health and safety concerns could easily be argued. One could also argue that the currency was defaced and therefore unfit for circulation.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:22 AM
4

My favorite part about the MensRights subreddit is almost every time one of our crazies makes a wild claim, we ask for scientific sources. If not provided we downvote their statements out of existence.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 09:21 PM
4

In case anybody else is having issues reaching the link from this pose, here's the archive link: https://archive.is/z6xxP
/r/MensRights08/08/17 09:16 PM
7

I would be equally mad to see one gendered restroom and one gender-neutral restroom, regardless if it were male or female. Idk, equality or something. All or none.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 06:08 PM
4

Blatant gender discrimination. Definitely worthy of a lawsuit. The school, the teachers, the district, the budget oversight committee. I'm with you.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 06:01 PM
2

Truth. And there may yet be more. I'd argue against incapacitation in all all circumstances such as sentences of community service, and against retribution in circumstances where there is no living victim or family. Shoot, I even questioned rehabilitation as there are times when no rehabilitation effort is made.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 01:46 AM
1

Sentencing has [at least] two [apllicable] functions [relative to this case]: rehabilitation for the criminally charged, and moreover as a motivational deterant to commit such acts against society. The more people that hear someone could get up to 32 years for using the police as a weapon and a cover-up, then there is probability in believing it will reduce those occurances. In the very least, it makes the public feel safer. Edit: GagfnyMcGuckin has a great reply to this. Definitely more than tw…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:23 PM
1

I second this opinion. Damages, court fees, and an amount to penalize unjust behavior.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 07:45 PM
5

I have seen two other videos similar to this where they were actual studies where they interviewed the bystanders afterwords. My question is are there any videos of similar scenarios where each gender plays the abuser for the duration and, after a duration, the simulated victim finally pushes back? I feel I already know the result (cheers for the woman who finally defends herself and horrified gasps for the man who defends himself) but I'm honestly curiously to see what people's unscripted react…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:15 AM
1

And don't accept her proposal for 10 days. Always stick with the 1r days. If you accept 10 days at any point and then keep her for the full duration, it will likely be used against you.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:17 AM
9

This is the best retort for that. I'm using this if I ever hear cry comment again. Thanks.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:25 AM
1

If people can see you in whatever fashion you choose to present yourself if public, I see no reason why your appearance and words cannot be recorded.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 01:59 AM
847

The wage isn't the main problem, though. He lost all his freedoms and was confined to a prison for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for four straight years. If anyone think adequate compensation based on minimum wage is justified, it should be at the base rate for the first 40 hours of every week and 1.5 times that rate for the remaining 128 hours in the week for all 208+ weeks he was confined.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 12:25 AM
21

Signed. Upvoted. Hope this gets the attention it deserves.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:49 AM
3

I second this.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 11:07 PM
2

Oh, and use terms like "extremist feminism" instead of 'crazy' to describe views that are extreme. Use terms like "progressive feminism" occasionally to describe a feminist view that you can correlate to a goal you have for a specific men's issue. Lastly, limit being "anti-" something. There's a reason the term "anti-abortion" was replaced with "pro-life." Not many people like associated with a group with a negative goal. You'll get a better following with a positive goal. TL;DR: Be humble, logi…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:14 AM
3

He appears to be trolling. You are attempting to fight for equality between the sexes from the male perspective in a country of 50 million. A movement begins with a single person with a calm and collected rational mindset. I believe you have just demonstrated your ability to do exactly that. You also demonstrated the ability to use scientific data to support your arguments. Emotionally charged subjective though will be divisive and often force people to choose a side as for or against a point of…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:04 AM
2

Makes sense. I'm a liberal that enjoys science and statistics being brought into debates and the videos of this gentleman demonstrates he has the power to destroy many views with facts and reason. Even as a well respected competitor, nobody wants to play a chess master unless he/she is polite enough to let you take some pieces. However, the results were clear here: check and mate.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 03:57 AM
8

Justice isn't served until she is charged with public intoxication, disorderly conduct, instigating a fight, assault/attempted battery, and makes a public apology to the gentleman. Not even convicted, just start with charges. Let it be on her record in the event she becomes a repeat offender. Let it documented that she is the type of person who resorts to violence in menial affairs. And ffs, let the public know that any adult is still to be held liable for their actions even when drunk in a skin…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 03:30 AM
3

Good piece documenting the struggle of free speech on campus. Definitely would recommend to others, and I definitely wish my campus had a men's group like the one that the gentleman in the video was a part.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:08 AM
1

There are no real "men's professional sports" outside of the Olympics of that I am aware. There are merely the professional sport that all sexes are allowed to join, most notably in the USA: NFL, NBA, and MLB. NCAA teams are also prohibited from discriminating against women enforced by Title IX and millions of dollars in fines. They (the regulations) don't care about sex, if you're good enough to play then you can play. Women's sports are blatantly sexist and are put in place simply to be all in…
/r/MensRights14/04/17 11:10 PM
1

Same. Would be far different if I were able to make the CHOICE as an adult, in which I would never have had it done, especially with how catastrophically they fucked up mine. It has done far more than simply leave a physical scar. This practice needs to be treated the same way as FGM, child abuse enforced with the same punishment of 5 years in prison at the very least. Though it won't save me, maybe it will save someone from the shit I've been through.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:50 PM
4

If it's not the women you fear/resent, but the societal construct built around women that gives them a majority of the power in any relationship that you fear/resent, then we're in the same boat my friend. I have no problem with a working relationship with women, but past experiences have taught me that self-preservation requires me to limit those relationships with women to the confines of the workplace. There is one non-family exception though, but she's a long-time friend. She's one of only a…
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:33 PM
7

The prosecution fell apart when the accuser's description of the location in which the alleged rape took place didn't match the characteristics of the actual location. Taking photos of the exterior and not the interior sounds extremely boneheaded and I doubt the legitimacy of this claim. The only other possible alternative is they were lost/withheld. Since they had the exterior photos, they likely weren't lost. If they were withheld, there can be motive to support either the accuser or the accus…
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:15 AM
3

Glad I'm not the only one who noticed that abhorrent decision.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 11:09 PM
1

Upvoted for the amazing analogy
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:31 PM
1

I whole-heartedly agree with the education system statement. Critical thinking is a skill that needs to be taught well before the high school level and needs to be applied to more than just academic literature. But it's not just the schools that should force us to use these skills, we must also police eachother. But I do not agree that it is easy to challenge long-standing beliefs, especially if learned from respected individuals or from personal traumatic experiences. Overcoming those obstacles…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:25 PM
8

The Guardian's article shows a little more detail: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/07/google-pay-disparities-women-labor-department-lawsuit?CMP=twt_gu Although the Guardian is also extremely biased, citing an earlier article where "men make up 61% of Google's work force" as if such an ubandunace of female employees in fields where many women have shown little to no interest is a shock. I wonder what would happen if the DoL finds that women are actually paid more for equal work, a…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 07:49 AM
5

She was taught by society, probably from a very young age, to view men in a negative light. It's easy for people to blindly accept these stereotypes until they (the beliefs) are brought into question. Holding such beliefs before they are challenged does not make her a bad person, it just makes her "immature" by the business definition of the word "incapable of considering situations from any perspective other than one's own." If she continues to keep a closed mind on the issue, that would make h…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 06:57 AM
1

Surprised the Washington Post would publish this editorial and the Denver Post would extend its circulation. I understand controversial articles to sell papers. This is not that. This is psycho-babel from a crazed and confused lunatic. Her opinion is her own, but I seriously hope nobody else takes it and perpetuates it.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 11:23 AM
2

One more person saved from unfair and unjust discrimination in the work place. A victory for the human race.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:48 AM
2

I also consider myself to be on the left, and the equal access to civil liberties, equal representation under the law, and destroying political constructs that target specific groups of people with precision all sound like particularly liberal ideologies to me. For the good of the people.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 08:39 AM
4

Sounds to me like the author is someone who has transcended the desire to appease horrible people who have wronged him in the past. I suppose the genders may be swapped in that the women eventually transcend the desire to appease the so-called "bad-boys" but there is one stark difference: the author as a man never changed what he wanted in a partner (mutual loyalty, respect and compassion) whereas the gender-swapped equivelant did (excitement, danger, and adventure for the aforementioned traits)…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter