TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TFME1 Archive

View 2 posts and 997 comments by TFME1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Excellent documentary about the empathy gap, men's loneliness epidemic and the obvious indicators of widespread, institutionalized "acceptibility" of misandry.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 02:37 AM
21

Be like Gen Y or Z: put on your headphones and act like you can't hear their misandristic comments. Point to your headphones and say, "Sorry, I can't hear you." If they touch you, call the police and file battery and sexual assault charges as unwanted physical contact. The laws can be weaponized in both directions, not just theirs.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 07:35 PM

Ignorance, even the innocent kind, isn't a very good look. Read a scientific white paper before spouting your lunacy. You make yourself sound dumb. But, then, maybe that's what you've been aiming for all along.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 04:39 AM
5

Nice projection, Sunshine. You should read about the Limbic system, sometimes referred to as the "reptile brain". There's also a bunch of new science-backed research about the inaccuracy of the "blank slate" theory of human development. But go ahead and tell your story however you like. Just don't try to peddle it to everyone else. Science doesn't support your claim. Conflict avoidance, lack of courage, and settling for complacency isn't what everyone else wants. If that's what you want, then fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 04:28 AM
1

Cool. Now do "Woman-keeping": the miserable bs men put up with to keep their woman from going neurotic and psycho.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 01:15 AM
2

Dumbest thing I've read all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 12:40 PM
1

Ok. Your "female to female" friendship example doesn't translate to male to female friendships.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 01:13 AM
-1

No duh, oversimplifying oversimplifier. I was delineating the differences between one type of relationship and another, since the lines seem to have blurred in the past decade or two. I don't know if you've noticed, but the demand list for even just dating, which has a potentially zero possibility of going anywhere due to mismatched preferences, has increased dramatically. And, yes, I know what intimacy is, but thanks for telling me what I already know. It's also obvious to me that you're compar…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:44 PM
0

Disagree. The nature of the two types of relationships are entirely different, with entirely different expectations on both sides. I don't pay my friends' bills. But then, there's no expectation of intimacy from them either. And that's just the top-level tip of the iceberg. Apples and oranges. Or at least Green apples vs. Red apples.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 08:14 PM
5

That's a whole list of erroneous stereotypes. Start with the wrong premises, and your conclusions will inevitably be just as erroneous.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 08:04 PM
5

Quite a stereotyping comment. I thought we weren't doing that anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 06:38 PM
6

That was only half the story, from what I can tell. It was the way other people treated her (she detransed). She was horrified by how men are treated by society, in general, not just by her friends. Her illusion about how awesome it would be to be a male was utterly destroyed. The catastrophic destruction of one's belief system isn't anything to trifle with. It may not lead where you think it will go. In fact, statistically, it probably won't. As the cliché goes, "The best laid plans of mice and…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:53 AM
4

I have my doubts about it being all disdain. While there'd have to be some of that in the distribution, the other part of the distribution is even worse; Apathy.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:43 AM
3

Women will never understand what being a man is, when all they can see is through the prism of their own socially reinforced gynocentric idealism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 05:11 AM
1

You'll get no argument from me that some quantity of loneliness is entirely up to the person who encounters it. Still, there's another quantity of loneliness that can only be attributed to the decline of pair-bonding (over some really dumb reasons, too). We're pack animals with opposable thumbs. We aren't intended to live life as discrete, isolated individuals. We're social by nature. Everyone claims fealty to nature and then ignores the truths within nature. Like taking bits from a religion and…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 01:38 AM
1

The notion that women are the paramores of human development. That women are the "better communicators". That women are more empathetic and kind. That gynonormative gaslighting. It's all bs as recent history has shown quite repeatedly. When that's the pulpy bs either in the thoughts of, or being mouthed by, a majority of therapists, then yes, it's industrialized gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 12:57 AM
-8

Seems like a little side distraction / detour to change the topic or buy time to think up a better response. Where else in your life do you use your condition as a distraction / detour to change the topic or buy time to think up a better response? Women aren't very good therapists for men. A lot of men aren't very good therapists for men, especially if they follow the gynonormative brainwashing that society has foisted upon men for decades. The industrial society-wide levels of gynocentric gasli…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 12:38 AM
2

No. It's strange that you don't know what a story is or how/when they're created...
/r/MensRights27/05/25 12:30 AM
-10

Not sure what being bipolar has anything to do with the original argument, but ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 12:28 AM
-11

Sure, they're just not usually very educated on the subject and, typically, of limited accuracy and usefulness. I've gotten plenty of advice from friends, and the advice is usually pretty sophomoric and with moderate frequency, even bordering on maliciously petty/vengeful. If that's the quality of advice you'd be happy with, then have at it. And whoever you made the bet with would be eating your lunch all month long.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 12:18 AM
2

Partially concur. It's an evaluation that can only be made on a case-by-case basis. Not all women are neurotic psychopaths. Many, in fact, are quite feasible for the limited utility of an opposite-gender friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 12:08 AM
-16

Your presumption is that they're always giving you honest, accurate and unbiased "therapy". They're not. Welcome to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 11:58 PM
3

Also, if you begin with faulty, erroneous suppositions, you'll nearly inevitably reach faulty, erroneous conclusions. I mean, sometimes even a blind squirrel will sometimes very luckily bump into a nut.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 11:35 PM
1

It's all about creativity, choices, and prices. Prices for creativity and good choices are almost always inevitably less costly that non-creative, bad choices. Yet, people bemoan their non-creative, bad choices and blame the entire society for their undesirable outcomes. Never their fault.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 11:30 PM
6

Or I could just ignore your story outright.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 11:15 PM
1

Your argument is lazy, contains no nuance, and blows right past any discernible depth of thought. If you're not willing to go as far down the rabbit-hole as possible, as it were, then perhaps your hot take is not quite ready for public consumption. I guess you're entirely ok with the overturning of Roe v. Wade, since that was the determined social stance during the recent elections?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 10:38 PM
6

By the way, everyone has a story, so you not having a story would be quite "othering" and self-inflicted.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 10:22 PM
7

Like I said, It's your story, tell it how ever you like. Your particular brand of brainwashing is your problem. I'd help you with it, but I don't suspect you'd be particularly receptive.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 10:20 PM
12

Not really, but it's your story. Tell it how you like.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 09:48 PM

All the time. Women are more critical of themselves and other women than men will ever be. And it's not an issue of preferences, it's an issue of "deal-killers." Men, at least the reasonable ones (yes, there are unreasonable ones), may not like one particular aspect or another about a woman, but will rarely find it to be a cause for complete dismissal, since the goal is pair-bonding and there's always the possibly of finding new awesomeness after getting to know each other. Every woman is a mixe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 09:45 PM
3

Trust but verify. Trust your neighbor, but lock your doors anyway. All people lie, even if only to themselves. Most people don't even make that distinction. Protect your seed. Women, just like men, are fully capable of lying and deceit. Moreso now than ever before in history. Do not get a woman pregnant if you aren't fully prepared to pair-bond with that woman and take care/responsibility for that child. Bring your own condoms to the event and never trust a woman who says she's "got it handled."…
/r/MensRights26/05/25 08:27 PM
0

Tempting, since modern women are pluralistically greedy, self-centered, bent on revenge (for misattributed, false-flag, logically fallacious grievances) and fail most any test of understanding the intrinsic value of others. They demand others observe their intrinsic value. They just don't reciprocate that intrinsic value. Me, me, me. But, no. I have no desire to turn gay. The stupidity of modern society does have an expiration date (if history continues to repeat, like it usually does), which wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 08:00 PM
2

Anything that exhibits hypocrisy, either historically or in modernity. You can't say something is inappropriate, shame people for doing it and then conduct that exact same behavior yourself without being a complete tool. That's just unethical power-hungry behavior. And it's not limited to any one gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 07:49 PM
18

It's hilarious that women think they have the monopoly on this, like men have nothing to fear and just saunter through life like it's a cake-walk. Pretty self-centered and self-absorbed I would suggest.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 07:05 PM
1

Well, it took hundreds or thousands of years for those various ethics to be socially manifested across the entire society. It's also not unrealistic to say that your list is extremely generalized in its presentation and, furthermore, wildly incomplete. And if it's partly inaccurate, it's completely inaccurate. Also, many of the things you've mentioned are very much kindercentric and gynocentric in their value proposition/statistics. You've mentioned almost nothing about the disposability of men,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 06:25 PM
3

So, you believe all the society-level ethics and morays are accurate in the moment? There's no latency between discoveries / epiphanies and societies' adjustment to them? I'd suggest that's wildly inaccurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 03:29 AM
1

That'd be like telling women to grow a backbone. Which would be pretty disrespectful, if you ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 02:46 AM
3

Society at large gets very little right. Ever. Society encouraging men to be more vulnerable is about as dumb as a box of rocks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 01:05 AM
1

The hoi poloi isn't the most reliable arbiter of "social appropriateness" when it gets way more wrong than it ever gets right. But because of the conflation of intrinsic value and righteousness, somehow, the tyranny of pure democracy gains validity. It's really pretty dumb, actually, to ever want pure democracy because the tyranny of the mob is no better than the myth of the well-meaning, generous dictator. Pure democracy is the chaotic mess the government was intended to tame. And fails miserab…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 12:27 AM
1

Seems like the ratio is really skewed right now. Seems like everyone has something. Mental health issues, physical issues. You may think there's a bunch of modern women out there that don't require a partner with a heart of gold, but sadly, you'd be incorrect. Modern women don't come in the low maintenance, self-sufficient, emotionally-balanced, easy-to-be-with variety they once used to be in far greater numbers. Now they're all openly, unrepentantly broken, dented, and dinged, and militant abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 07:19 PM
1

Yeah. Cause they don't exist, right? We all say what needs saying, without exception, right? Extreme or excessive courtesy is never a concern in modern society? Never a failure of honesty? Quite a rosie picture you've painted for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 09:13 AM
4

Ah. That explains a lot. You do know the original incel... the person who coined the word, was a woman... to describe herself and her community of involuntary celibates. A 5 minute bit of research was obviously too difficult for you. And, no, white-knighting is defending women in spite of ALL their quite obvious flaws. Basically, ignoring the flaws to the degree that women can run roughshod over men without any repercussions. It's been rumored that women don't need defending... Just kidding... t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 09:02 AM

Well, you are an oversimplifying, assuming moron, so I'm not totally surprised. I can only surmise that you're a self-flagelating douche-nozzle, who routinely genuflects at women's feet any time they so much as sneeze. You must get something out of it, so...whatever. Enjoy! Misery loves company. You're perfect for each other. It's interesting how male dissenters are roundly dismissed, while female dissenters are victim-worshipped.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 08:51 AM

Found the white-knighting, simping moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 08:31 AM
0

So, what you're saying is...it's not shitty behavior to want my dick sucked by a woman? Got it! Gee...thanks soooo much for helping me out, Scooter. I never would have guessed. /s <eyeroll>
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 08:21 AM

They weren't directed directly at me, so...Go f*ck yourself. Maybe you're a terrible person and just don't know it since none of your beta male friends had the balls to tell you. Anyway, Cool story, bro. Does that answer your question adequately? Thanks for stopping by.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 08:01 AM
3

Really, because I've been around for a while and heard all the shaming bs about men having standards and preferences. It's now been called sexism, misogyny, fat-shaming, body-shaming, shaming-shaming... Just put anything in front of shaming, with a hyphen, and men have been called it. Now, the women are doing the same thing and saying, "What?!?! I can't have preferences?!?!". No. Not after the riot act men were read for having them. If we can't have them, them having them is purely and simply Hy…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 07:50 AM

Ok. Clarify your meaning, then. I'm not a mind reader, dumbass. Written words only give limited clues and context to the writers intent and meaning. So, before you go all smart-ass, perhaps have a little patience with the reader/audience and clarify your meaning before going all snarky. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 07:28 AM
-1

Women have been telling men for decades that their preferences were too high... too limited...too exclusionary. Essentially, shaming men for having preferences. So, it's no wonder why men are pissed that women have grown wildly unrealistic preferences with their new-found "empowerment". Just sh1tty humans doing sh1tty human things. Women aren't above sh1tty behavior. They're just better at PR and have a monopoly on all the pussy. Complete power corrupts completely. Welcome to the gynocentry.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 07:18 AM
0

And if it's not about money, why are all the modern women demanding their partners make a six-figure salary or get lost? Statistically, that eliminates roughly 90-95% of the male population. When they, the blue- haired mafia, don't even make a fraction of that. Splain' that to me, white-knight bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 07:07 AM

You don't really understand compassion, do you, moron? It's doing something you'd RATHER not do... something you DON'T have to do... but you do it anyway because the person you love will be better for it. Duh. Do I have to explain everything? Women are definitely NOT the arbiters of empathy and compassion...unless they feel like it. But not when they don't feel like it. But maybe a little if it makes them look good. But definitely NOT if it will make them look bad. Women are masters of optics an…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 06:55 AM
2

Not really. False equivalency. Women without children actually make more money and own more homes than men. Children cause the wage gap. Just ask @Bluehorserunning. She'll tell you all about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 06:34 AM
0

If they were truly compassionate, they'd WANT to process more wieners than a hot dog factory (or at least make prostitution legal again, but neither of these things will ever happen). Don't fool yourself. Women have been told they're the "better half" for so long, I think they actually believe it now. They've been conditioned to believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 06:24 AM
1

I'm not talking about the promiscuous. That's kind of the point, isn't it? We're talking about the frigid and the hyper-selective, not the promiscuous. That's not even really a part of this conversation. You kinda' went down a rabbit-hole on that one. Still, for those that are saving themselves for marriage? They're very likely NOT liberal. But many people these days are "not religious" until they suddenly grow a religion as an excuse to get out of something that looks like work.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 05:49 AM

It's all about setting and managing expectations, moron. But I still want the sammich. Can you help a brother out? The bottle of chardonnay is in the refrigerator. Shall I pop the cork? You could give me a back rub. I just can't get past that allusion to gay activities. Are you going to make me beg? Just like all the other "empowered" women do? Are you "empowered"? Come on, Daddy. Let's figure this out together. Or perhaps you could stfu with your dumb, rescuer mouth or open it wide for Daddy. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 05:39 AM
-6

Just disrupting gender-based power dynamics that women complain about ALL THE TIME. It's my civic duty to create equality of outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 05:29 AM

I've wasted enough time censoring myself, and women are quite often morally ambiguous, holier-than-thou, virtue-signaling morons. But how can I assist you, in light of your overly-civilized, hyper-egalitarian, rescuer mentality, j@ck-@55? Would you like to read Robert's Rules of Order and have a glass of Chardonnay? Maybe we could cuddle. Your allusion to gay activities has me really hot and bothered. Come on over here, big guy. I gotta get me some of that. Moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 05:18 AM
0

Make me a sammich. I'll consider your proposal while I consume the sammich.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 05:08 AM
-3

Yes. Pretty much. Living off the taxpayer teat so they can be single and "empowered". And garnering all the pity points for being a single parent. So they don't have to do anything too "sweaty" or too "gross". Yes. Definitely. Female privilege. Comes with blue hair and everything. Women hide their objectification of men and their petty bs behind dating apps, so they don't have to look like the cowardly sh1ts they truly can be (and usually are). Now they outright demand 6 figure salaries. I'm lau…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 04:40 AM
2

Total bias. Women rarely see the shi1tiness in other women. It's part of the Sisterhood thing. Some kind of bs blinders or excuse mechanism. Women can be utterly sh1tty and will get a Vitamin P pass. Everyone knows it and yet deny its existence. It's the pie-in-the-sky crowd who excuses all the bad behavior unless it's done by a man. Then, the knives come out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 03:50 AM
-10

Any doctors or nurses in the house? Men are statistically more likely to die of cardiac "broken heart syndrome" (Takotsubo cardiomyopathy) than women. Save a life, suck a wiener. It's the compassionate thing to do. You won't get preggers that way, and I hear there's protein and some other magic minerals in it that are actually good for the women-folk. Might put hair on your chest...oh, wait... Funny how new discoveries about nature usually screws up all the moronic, statistically white, female l…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 03:20 AM
2

Victim-blaming beta soy boi? Or just working on getting a date with liberal Feminazi? I'm just curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 03:10 AM
0

So, if more women than men own houses, and more women are better off than men, then obviously women should get paid less, right? I mean... fair is fair, correct? By the way, there are dozens of different types of pregnancy avoidance tools. Internal, external, with creams and gels, without creams and gels, ribbed for her pleasure. Pregnancy is more of a choice now than ever. So, wtf is your major malfunction over sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:32 AM

Force multiplication is the ability to create much greater accomplishments within the context of a two (or more) person team. Two people can create far better results than one, alone, and in a far quicker time frame. You might know it better as DINK - Dual Income No Kids. I wouldn't expect a Feminazi to understand this. But do try anyway. And I, again, restate that success in life and happiness isn't measured by how many homes you own. But you do you. Hope you can learn how to fix water heaters,…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:02 AM
1

By the way, I'm curious... Have you ever even been to any of those countries you so glibly rattled off? I'm guessing "No", based on your ignorant statement about them "being so radically different". I bet you haven't been further than 20 blocks from your studio apartment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 10:11 PM
1

I'd prefer more rational pair-bonding, with more reasonable, rational women. In the absence of reasonable, rational women, then rational pair-bonding becomes moot, and prostitution would be the next best thing. Sorry if that offends your sense of right and wrong, but what can I say...I don't really care about your fragile sensibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 10:01 PM
1

Apparently, their women aren't neurotic, crazy, empowered (read as greedy) in those places. They probably don't treat their vaginas like closely guarded lottery prizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 08:26 PM
1

I did say rarely. You're making my point for me. I'd never talk to a woman unless it was absolutely necessary, assuming prostitution were legal. Too many of them are toxic idiots now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 08:23 PM
0

Happy for you. Enjoy your cats.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 08:20 PM
1

By the way, I don't consider homeownership as a mark of success in being happy. Done it. It sucked, so I sold it. Have fun in your overpriced, bank harassing, task-generator. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 07:05 PM
1

I guess what I'm trying to say is, "Enjoy your cats."
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 06:57 PM
-1

Cool story. It's not legal here. Men have zero options other than to enslave themselves to a neurotic, crazy woman or get really friendly with Rosie Palms. Rosie costs way less.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 06:55 PM

You should also really educate yourself around "force multiplication". Or not. And remain dumber than a deceased bush.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 06:52 PM

🤣🤣🤣🤣 Said the obvious Feminazi. Doubtful, but the way. Modern women usually suck at negotiation out of some weird form of intended meekness/non-aggressiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 06:47 PM
0

You're mad that men get to reject you before you can even think of rejecting them. 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 06:46 PM
1

I'm imperfectly (mildly) happy without one. 😊 The "cost" of modern women is way too high. Maybe once reality breaks in and the feminism-itis abates, tell be worth marrying again, but now? No thanks. What do modern women expect from men... labor, money, a high standard of living... I'm perfectly happy to let modern women empower themselves into homelessness. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 05:09 PM
1

This thread wasn't about men's issues but nice pivot / "what-about-ism". And yes, this was about modern women. Since that's what the thread is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 05:06 PM
-1

It's hilarious when someone says, "I have news for you about...", and then never clarify what their news is...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 05:04 PM
1

Yes, because modern women are never in their feelings. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 05:01 PM
-2

Because there'd be a much reduced incentive for men and modern women are trifling cowards who wouldn't risk rejection if their objectifying lives depended on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 12:56 AM
-5

Never said it was. Just observing that modern women are like children with a new toy that they don't want to share with anyone who doesn't meet their steep list of demands.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 12:53 AM
-4

Make prostitution legal again, but then men would rarely, if ever, get married after that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 10:23 PM
2

Women need to be aware that they are easily replaceable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:19 AM

Also, it's not a marker of brilliance to come up with immoral and unethical power dynamics. A common street rat can figure stuff like that out. It's creating moral and ethical solutions that's truly difficult. The lefties are complete idiots. They're just good at recycling dumb ideas that have failed time and time again.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 03:39 AM

But the interesting thing is... Speech is also violence. So, apparently, everything is violence. Silence. Speech. Lefties are idiots.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 03:08 AM

Nah. We're reminded of how misogynist we are pretty much constantly, even when we're not misogynist we're told we're misogynist, so let's not attempt a flip of the discussion now. It's pretty much a blanket accusation... low-hanging fruit... and it's way overused, so we can pretty much just move right on past it, since you all are mesmerized and convinced by the Feminism-itis. It's the misandrist morons who skate scott-free. Try again. Women were "organizing" long before the internet was even a …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:54 AM

Just like any other social system dynamic, you either go along with it or buck it. If a woman goes along with the tradition, then isn't silence violence? So, silent women who don't buck the bad behavior are violent if the lefties are correct. The lefties taught everyone that "silence is violence". Guess it has to work both ways. The proverbial double-edged sword, as it were.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:52 AM

It's like they don't realize that there's an internet or that everyone can use it, even men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:35 PM

Manipulative? Possibly. Still seems like a wildly unnecessary and divisively reductionist mentality. Maybe even victim-blaming. They both usually travel in pairs... loneliness and horniness. If you find one, there's a really high likelihood you'll find the other. If I had to guess, I'd presume this was written by a woman. Potentially a misandrist one, at that. Ah! Pink Pilled woman. No big surprise there. There's loneliness in many facets - Physical, Mental, Emotional and Spiritual. Not sure why…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 10:45 PM
29

Women don't handle rejection at all. They rarely put themselves in positions where rejection is a possible outcome. And when they do actually accept the possibility of rejection, they react terribly during the percentage of time that the rejection actually occurs. This is also true of a rapidly increasing number of men in the younger generations. Definitely not an "improvement" or "progress."
/r/MensRights25/03/25 10:58 PM
0

Most idiotic thing I've read recently. Completely tone deaf and ignorant. Use of the word misogyny increased over 800% between 1960 and now. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=misogyny&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 For comparison of Misogyny versus Misandry: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=misandry%2C+misogyny&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 Modern women have been told for so long that they're "always right" that I think they act…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 08:14 AM
24

Use of the word misogyny increased over 800% between 1960 and now. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=misogyny&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 For comparison of Misogyny versus Misandry: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=misandry%2C+misogyny&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 Modern women have been told for so long that they're "always right" that I think they actually believe it, despite being ignorant, childish, arrogant idiots who th…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 07:59 AM
5

Yes. Been saying this for years.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 07:53 AM
1

Average woman =/= All women. And, it's illegal for humans to partake in prostitution in the US. I'm not entirely convinced that prostitution shouldn't be made legal again, like it was before. One or the other. Both conditions shouldn't be allowed to exist concurrently. Either women need to be more accommodating or prostitution should be made legal again. This is certainly true, but that doesn't change the fact that men have high expectations too and many women experience difficulty in finding an…
/r/MensRights23/11/23 06:37 AM
1

It can be: 1.) Hard for both men and women AND 2.) Hard-ER for men. These aren't mutually exclusive statements. They can BOTH be true, simultaneously. If you don't look like a Hollywood celebrity, one's gender is less relevant than one's unattractiveness as compared with the comparable "beautiful people". The culture and the level of expectation have already been set and ratcheted up time and time again, with each successive generation. The celebrity worship is stronger than ever, seemingly. Or,…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 06:04 AM
2

I get that "both things can be true at the same time". Both men and women get "left behind" in similar, but different, ways. The issue seems to be that women are taken far more seriously when they're "left behind" and men are straight up dismissed when they're "left behind". Still, don't "shoot the messenger" when the messenger is empathetic or the empathetic crowd may shrink by 1. Done over and over enough times, and there'll be no one left in the empathetic crowd.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 11:30 PM
3

What managers can do The first step to getting people to be comfortable talking about their mental health at work, irrespective of gender, is to build a climate where it is psychologically safe to show vulnerability. Ummm... I'm not talking to my manager about my personal life. It's none of their business. Are they getting some sort of medical licensing in addition to their role-specific education and training? Where do they get these moronic liberal RadFem writers? What sort of moron thinks sug…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 10:10 PM
7

The "downside" of efficiency.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:01 PM
9

WHAT?!?! You mean governments and courts can "get it all wrong"? Say it isn't so! /s
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:00 PM
29

"It's all for the children!" /s Sexism is sexism, even if it's "all for the children". Female privilege.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 10:58 PM
1

I simply am not willing to be subservient to a woman who won't be subservient to me. I'm perfectly willing to have the mindset and heart of a servant, if it's reciprocal. If not, "I'm out". If there's no "upside" to being in a relationship, then there's no point in being in a relationship. If it's all "downside", I'll be perfectly happy all by my lonesome.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 07:14 AM
1

Floating alone in the void, while less desirable, is still better than being a "man servant" to an entitled, lazy, indignant woman. If you make yourself someone you could be proud of, while remaining humble, then you've done everything you can do to make yourself attractive to others. What others think you should be may be important, but it's far more important what YOU think you should be. There were women who "fell in love" with Charles Mansion. While they were complete morons, it just goes to…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 05:22 AM
2

There's no blueprint, brother. No one, single path that leads to success, from what I can see. It's millions of parallel paths, with differing levels of success. The differing levels of success are entirely random; as random as the human beings who create them. Do your own thing. Put yourself out there. Make yourself available. Be deliberate. Figure out what you want and which hills you're prepared to proverbially "die for". Once you've got that figured out, and have those results in mind, be co…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 04:31 AM
3

Only you can decide what you are suppose to be, to the greatest degree humanly possible, in a universe where, unfortunately, entropy and randomness cannot be eradicated. I have attempted to develop a particular level of utility in my own life, to be able to exist/participate fully in a relationship of either style. It's the dumbass neurotic squishy selfish "middle" that gets me. Overall, I think I lean slightly towards "modern", since it gives more people what they say they want (they may discov…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 03:41 AM
8

It exposes the 50/50 split in the manosphere between the men who want traditional values returned to the norm, and the men who want full male/female equality with no extra expectations of men as the norm I'd be happy with either version, traditional or modern, just pick one and stick with it. It's the wishy-washy bs, sometimes-this-sometimes-that, which bugs the hell outta me. Women can't have it both ways, simultaneously, cherry-picking the "best of both worlds" while the man is doing all the l…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 02:25 AM
1

No. I was very clear in my discussion points that any such transition, by exposure to Testosterone, would have to occur in utero AND at a very specific time (16 weeks, if memory serves correctly), but doctors aren't "perfect" at properly determining how many weeks along a baby is, unless the mother knows exactly/specifically what date the impregnation occurred. They'd have to thread the needle. Too early would create problems. Too late would cause problems. It's simply better to not "monkey arou…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 01:13 AM
0

No, moron. Ready it again. I know what a trans man is, dumbass. Moron is trying to convince people that a biological woman, who is simply "exposed" to Testosterone, will "grow" a penis and that it'll be perfectly functional. Like the prosthetic or cadaver testes will actually, magically, produce sperm robust enough to actually impregnate a uterus-bearing biological woman. It takes a very highly trained, highly specialized doctor and an entire surgical team multiple hours to perform the necessary…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:56 AM
1

Hahahahaha...A self aware, fully in control moron is a still, at the end of the day, a moron. By the way, if I'm obnoxious then it's only in response to obnoxious tyrannical shitbags like you, with matching severity. The universe will give you back 10 fold whatever you put out there.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 11:58 PM
2

No one's stopping you from being "oblivious". You'd be doing us all a Public Service if you did. The only person stopping you from being oblivious is YOU. We're just trying to stop you from being OBNOXIOUS.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 11:52 PM
1

No one's stopping you from being "oblivious". You'd be doing us all a Public Service if you did. The only person stopping you from being oblivious is YOU. We're just trying to stop you from being OBNOXIOUS.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 11:49 PM
1

Happy to waste your time. Sh1tbags, like you, are constantly throwing wrenches in everything. It's the least I could do, to annoy and time-waste with a moron. At least you're not out, in public, unnecessarily complicating everything and destroying more public experience. Just call it a public service. Making morons sad...just returning the favor. 👍
/r/MensRights09/11/22 11:43 PM
1

How's this: You arrogant fuck. Morons, light on life experience (like you), shouldn't attempt to "correct" anyone. Your undeserved, unproven (yet 100% committed) certainty is funny as hell. Go find another moron to "seed of doubt". I'm not buying your dumbass rhetoric and likely never will. The fact that you're more empathetic to special interest groups, as opposed to acknowledging ALL HUMANS, tells me everything I need to know about you. You speak about the future as if you already know the fut…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 11:12 PM
0

Says the obvious Dunning Kruger (at least, obvious to everyone else).
/r/MensRights09/11/22 10:58 PM
1

True. This moron sounds like a closeted gay whose too embarrassed or too ashamed to follow through, even though no one gives a crap who he puts his weiner in.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:37 PM
1

I never said it's not complicated. I never said there aren't deviations from XX or XY. Those are your moronic projections and assumptions. The PLURALITY of humans ARE straightforward XX or XY. You calling out the minute percentage of deviations doesn't MAKE you, or them, EMPIRICALLY "more ethical" or EMPIRICALLY "more moral". Moron. You sound like you're 12. The imperfect outcomes from nature aren't reason enough to determine that your stupid take is anything more than a passing phase, where mor…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:29 PM
0

The "exposure" to testosterone would have to happen "in utero". If not, the fetus will be whatever sex nature determines its going to be. Female exposure to testosterone, post-birth, will NOT cause a penis to grow. Testosterone, in small quantities, is ALREADY present in females, just like estrogen, in small quantities, is ALREADY present in males. It's the "net ratio" that determines the outcome, determined ENTIRELY during gestation. For females, a penis would have to be SURGICALLY added, post-…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 05:11 PM
-1

Congratulations on graduating Kindergarten Biology, moron. However, you're moronic take isn't an "empirical" take, soooo...
/r/MensRights09/11/22 02:27 PM
1

More like, "If you protect your seed, you protect your wallet."
/r/MensRights09/11/22 05:06 AM
10

Show me a Trans-Woman who can carry a fetus to term in "her" uterus. Or a Trans-Man who can produce and ejaculate semen out of the Meatus of "his" penis. You GTFOH. Moron. You bought into some bs that some moron spouted and now you're regurgitating it like it's "always been true". It's never been true and you're just the latest moron to promulgate the fad.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 05:00 AM
27

Going to? Many men are already there.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:02 PM
1

Fair enough. I suspect your experience isn't much different from many other people's experience, at least in this one facet.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 04:10 PM
5

Does that mean she is entitled to up to 5x's spousal support if she divorced them all?
/r/MensRights08/11/22 04:07 PM
1

Cool. One out of 165 million. I'll increment/update the tally.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 04:04 PM
0

Romantic love isn't the truest form of love. That's Eros. What you're referring to is Phileo (brotherly love). There's also Storge (familial love) and the truest form of love - Agape'. Is Agape' actually possible between humans? I don't know, but it certainly seems like a good and appropriate pursuit.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 02:08 PM
3

Some people simply aren't built/capable of the truest form of love, the kind that doesn't have prerequisites or pre-judgements. Maybe they've sustained injuries that haven't healed, yet. Perhaps biologically, they simply don't have the necessary wiring for it.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 03:07 AM
0

Sure...If you're a moron, it won't make any sense to you. It will make sense to most everyone else, just not you.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 12:39 AM
1

https://issafrica.org/pscreport/psc-insights/african-conflicts-to-watch-in-2022#:~:text=Libya%2C%20South%20Sudan%2C%20the%20Central,war%20from%202018%20to%202019.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 07:44 PM
2

I guess there've never been civil wars in Africa...Oh, wait...I almost forgot...They're still going right now... Today...Right this very second. https://issafrica.org/pscreport/psc-insights/african-conflicts-to-watch-in-2022#:~:text=Libya%2C%20South%20Sudan%2C%20the%20Central,war%20from%202018%20to%202019. Apparently, even book-writing, disinformation-peddling Professors can be frickin' morons. To be fair, she is in California, which seems to cause Logic Rot. Must be in the water, or something.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 07:41 PM
3

Yes. Definitely Misandry. No equivocation.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 04:53 PM
3

Don't let yourself be deceived. There are many males that are feminists and advocates. Half the gender has probably gone sell-out and thrown men under the proverbial bus, still hoping to pair-bond and thinking that coddling and compliance are the paths to get there. Unfortunately, they'll probably have to learn the hard way that traditions have been disrupted and a simple majority of modern women just aren't on the same page anymore. Full-blown sexism, hidden behind a facade of "anti-sexism", an…
/r/MensRights05/11/22 03:59 AM
3

Instead of women simply gaining rights and equality, they've turned it into a Zero Sum Game, where men MUST lose rights for the women to win. Total overcorrection.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 01:02 PM
40

Complete power corrupts completely. Give them an inch and they think they're a ruler. This is what happens when you tell women, for decades on end, that their world view is the ONLY "right one", with no dissent, no pushback or no attempt to moderate the worst of the extremism in it.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 02:57 AM
2

You didn't say legion. I did. And it's not entirely unrealistic that a smaller group, being strategically placed, can create larger seeming results. The frontline employees in the media aren't all politically aligned with the C Suite. It's the ones IN the C Suite that deserve our concern (and scorn) the most.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 08:21 PM
1

Wow. You've really bought into the (unnecessarily judgey and divisive) Intersectionalism schlock. Every demographic group is demonized now, by their self- determined nemesis. The haters are usual small in number, but loud (to make you think they're "legion"). They're usually crazy as hell and they're usually NOT legion, either. Stop buying into the moronic Intersectionalism rhetoric. We're all humans, we're all suffering, and we all have bad habits to overcome. Morons on the left focus on the pa…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 08:15 PM
1

Not sure what you're referring to, Left-Fielder. The norm is usually discrimination against ALL men (although some men don't mind, since they don't perceive it as a problem).
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:52 PM
1

I agree. Same thing with all the special interest holidays and "celebration months". If it isn't going to be for everyone, with everyone welcomed and celebrated, I'd rather it not be done at all. If cultural appropriation is actually a thing, then why are we making cultural-related holidays? Isn't that cultural appropriation, also, for all the demographic "out-group" people? What about Gender Appropriation?
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:53 PM
5

The rate of broken homes is increasing, due largely to cultural shifts, regardless of what I want or don't want. What kind of dumb question is that? I don't want more families to implode. However, that's going to happen anyway, regardless of my "wants". It's also no doubt that the culture needs to improve for men, as well as women. However, the moronic statement that "Men wrote the laws" is a lousy excuse, largely dismissive of women's contributions to society, throughout history, and is patentl…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:40 AM
0

In modern times, it only takes one woman to justify anything they want. "Lack of single fathers" is a pretty poor excuse, if you ask me. Anyway, the lack of single fathers is kind of the point and a problem in its own right. That's like saying "You can't buy a ticket because I stole all your money. Sorry, not sorry." That's simply adding insult to injury.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:47 AM
6

In modern times, it only takes one woman to justify anything they want. "Lack of single fathers" is a pretty poor excuse, if you ask me. Anyway, the lack of single fathers is kind of the point and a problem in its own right. That's like saying "You can't buy a ticket because I stole all your money. Sorry, not sorry." That's adding insult to injury.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:47 AM
0

A little bit of their dignity back? Maybe more equitable treatment?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:51 AM
2

No one likes to be wronged by the deception of false advertising. You're not wrong for feeling traumatized. Seek appropriate help, brother. You deserve to move past this deception.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:29 PM
2

Nah, don't do that, brother. There are plenty of reasons to ignore the morons. You have to find the one, hopefully many, reason(s) to give purpose to your life and make your life worth sticking around for. I'll give you one: If for no other easily apparent reason, stay alive to irritate a liberal douche-nugget. Saw a bumper sticker once that puts it succinctly: "Work hard and play hard. Piss off a liberal." I think this is known as being "disagreeable". Do that until you find an even better purp…
/r/MensRights25/10/22 11:13 PM
5

This is what starvation does, even in nature. No species is immune to the effects of it. Funny how some demographic groups pledge allegiance to nature then promptly forget about nature. Men need to improve their skill regarding how to experience starvation better without indulging in desperation. Improve their already existing capability to thrive in uncertainty and starvation to the highest degree possible. An increase in women's experience of starvation will follow, if men are able to comport …
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:06 AM
1

Hopefully, the head that it comes to isn't an extremely violent one, because some of the women will be called, but ALL of the men will.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:55 AM
1

Too much? Or not enough? I'm not a spring chicken either, but am a little fed up with all the wokester bs going on lately. All of this unchecked entitlement bs is either going to turn men into chronologically adult children OR the moronic "powers that be" are gonna land us in a war - civil or global. Maybe "all of the above". I'd prefer "none of the above", if I have even the slightest miniscule level of "say". Giving the "benefit of the doubt" to someone who isn't going to reciprocate it, and w…
/r/MensRights21/10/22 01:54 AM
3

And another segment of the female population are immature and entitled. It's amazing how quickly the female worship fades once the worshipers realize they've been duped. And when the worshipers all disappear, it's also amazing how quickly the once-worshiped women become shocked and indignant about the sudden lack of blind worship.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 01:46 AM
10

Courtesy and kindness aren't limited to the work place. That's called "professionalism" where one is paid by an employer to conduct the employers business, despite any disparities between coworkers in the areas of philosophy, religion or belief systems. Men get crapped on for being courteous, kind and helpful by ungrateful, hyper-sensitive, imposter syndrome motivated morons. No one's saying they're incompetent. That's their own fallacious internal interpretation of a simple act of kindness that…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:59 PM
1

Anyway, that's where faith becomes far more immediately critical. When all hope seems lost, not all hope is gone. It just seems lost. Perception is everything.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:06 PM
1

Sounds about right. Given a long enough timeline, people will typically over-generalize, over-dramatize, simply forget or never bother to learn the precedents that were the outcomes of those who have gone before and learned the hard lesson the hard way. What we're discussing are merely the highlights (and lowlights) of history. The observable extremes. The largest contributions and the largest transgressions. Much of the minutia (not to minimize the contributions of the giant's shoulders we stan…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:04 PM
1

True, at the individual level. However, enough people "blissing out" and a society marches slowly, inexorably, towards inevitable destruction. All it would take for evil to prevail is for one more good person to do nothing. Edmund Burke (disputed) or John Stuart Mill
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:47 PM
1

No one has "pinned down the truth/reality of the world" or even a full picture of how their contributions have influenced their society. I have notional ideas about my own purpose, which lacks 100% certainty. More like 75-80%, but still putting in the effort. Still, there are those who will never stop learning or trying to "grow" their understanding of the above. And there are many who are happy and content in their ignorance. Essentially, the less willing one is to learn, the further they are f…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:39 PM
1

I'm not trying to "convince you". I literally can't "convince you" and force an idea into your head. By planting the seed, you may convince yourself. Until you convince yourself, you can believe whatever you want to believe. Still, "Si Vis Pacem Parabellum" was one of the many credo's of the Roman Empire and the Roman Army. Granted, they got as much wrong as they got right, but no "perfect society" has existed since the dawn of time. If you don't know history, you have little hope of knowing the…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:06 PM
1

Culture. The concept of "Si Vis Pacem Pacem" ("If you truly want peace then prepare for peace" or Peace through weakness/lack of preparation) which professes/includes that ALL conflict is immoral/unethical/bad and ALL violence is immoral/unethical/bad. Therefore, since men are more likely to prepare for, practice in and, ultimately, have historically participated in conflict (internally and externally) and (righteous) violence at higher levels, the plurality of such men are immoral/unethical/bad…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 07:35 PM
1

Be more specific. What hatred on whose account?
/r/MensRights20/10/22 07:20 PM
1

It is a distribution, so I'm reasonably confident that there's a small segment of women who are feminists who actually don't hate men as opposed to the much larger segment who say they don't hate men, but for the 2nd group, their actions and belief systems inevitably expose the lie. It takes time and attention to observe the actions which will expose the lie. So, yes, time will inevitably show everyone the truth about the "covert", hidden misandrists, who say they don't hate men. Actions rarely …
/r/MensRights20/10/22 07:15 PM
1

While true, drunks who attend meetings are still drunks. They're reformed drunks who own their alcohol addiction. While words are important, the vocabulary "whack-a-mole" game is simply a distraction from the current discussion at hand.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:53 PM
1

While true, that's usually only completely true for the victim, themselves (since they are being attacked). It's "diminishingly true" for the 3rd party Good Samaritan. Good Samaritans are expected to have greater presence of mind (since they're not being attacked, unless/until they are being directly attacked) to act in a more composed manner. The law makes justifications for someone being directly attacked to "not be in their right mind" out of fear or injuries to the head. No such justificatio…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:34 PM
1

Self defense is lawful, no doubt. So is "defense of another". But your "counterpoint" is flawed and isn't representative of any court or laws in the US. But the defense against the crime must also be commensurate and proportional to the crime itself. If the victim isn't dead and the perpetrator is, that's not exactly proportional or commensurate. It's unlawful/illegal to kill an unarmed person unless you're "in fear for your life", as in the perpetrator is going to kill the victim. Rape, with no…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:05 AM
2

Misogyny means whatever they want it to mean, in the moment. Right or wrong, do you think I'm going to be hyper-nitpicky about what misandry means? Maybe I should be, but nah. Anyway, it's few and far between that any woman would willingly wear the mantle of Misandrist. Their vanity would get intolerably bruised and injured.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:52 AM
3

Feminists who say they don't hate men are misandrists whether they admit it or not. It's simply unacknowledged misandry. Admitting it or not is irrelevant. Are people who say they don't have a drinking problem still an alcoholic, when all the evidence points to them being an alcoholic? But... but...but...they don't admit it. So what. They're simply alcoholics who haven't acknowledged it yet. Just give them time and the truth will make itself obvious.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:46 AM
7

Had to bite my tongue really hard recently, listening to a low-level medical tech talking about how she'd be perfectly ok with someone "putting a bullet in a man's head" if he were committing sexual assault on a woman, knowing full-well that other patients were sitting there. She wasn't even trying to do it quietly, either. I think such men should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, and punished accordingly if found guilty, but they do have a right to "Due Process". Vigilantism is th…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:18 AM
5

Some feminists don't even consciously realize that they're misandrists...They've been gas-lit for centuries. Since all humanity has told them, ad nauseum, that they're the oppressed "better gender" and overall "better humans". This is due the concept, lacking loads of nuance, that all aggression and all conflict is "bad". Hint: it's not. There are legitimate, justifiable uses of aggression and even violence, if the cause is true and appropriate. This is the foundation of the Teleological type et…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:00 AM
2

They'll just say they did the bad thing at the behest of a man, under duress... just like Ghislaine Maxwell.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:08 AM
2

"When they notice that you stop caring, it will usually dissipate." So... Do nothing and hope it all "disappears"? That's never going to move the needle back towards equality for men!?!?
/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:35 AM
2

Agreed. However, a percentage of women will still accuse you even if you DO leave. Although, this would definitely go a long way towards cooling things down and increasing the odds that she won't make the accusation.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:17 AM
2

I can empathize. I've multitasked a job and school. I've multitasked multiple jobs (sometimes more than 2 jobs). I've worked hourly jobs and salaried jobs. I'd like to work fewer hours, each week, but not zero hours. Providing for a family isn't "free". A change to the definition of a standard work week would provide everyone more discretionary time. Make it like 3 days/24 hours per week and the more ambitious people can get a 2nd job, working another 3 days a week. Once they've achieved the lev…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 03:54 PM
1

Nah. Nothing is "inevitable". Things rarely, like Bigfoot sighting rarely, ever go the way they're planned or imagined, due to Unintended Consequences. And there will always be work for humans, no matter how many robots Elon builds. Somebody still needs to fix the robots when they break or misbehave, right? Humans don't explicitly trust other humans or non-humans. Nor should they. There's a reason why experienced human's trust is only "earned". Your mindset is "inexperienced", excessively ideali…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 02:26 PM
1

That's a pretty dumb question and it's pretty apparent where you're headed with it. I have plenty of time with my family. Balance and earned income is my goal, in order to put food on my family's table. Also, I wouldn't complain about a decrease in the number of hours in the standard work week, but I'm not going to sit at home with my thumb up my butt, either. The anti-work morons are greedy pos's... just greedy for extreme amounts of discretionary time, instead of money. Time greed is still gre…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 03:40 AM
3

Not going to reject anyone who supports men's rights, but not gonna vote for him, either. UBI is the wishful, pie-in-the-sky brain-child of lazy, work-avoiding morons.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 01:12 AM
3

RadFems: "Representation matters!" Average Women: "oh, wait... you mean we actually have to build walls!?!?" This woman: I build walls, even though some people think they're Xenophobic.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 12:41 AM
9

Best of luck.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 04:50 AM
5

It's next to impossible to "never encounter a woman". That's not what I'm suggesting. Just suggesting that you know what you're walking into and what to look out for. The animals aren't what you need to worry as much about.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 04:02 AM
5

In animal shelters, you'll be surrounding by animals AND women. Veterinarians and any careers related to animals seem to deeply lack "equal" male representation (they're overrun by women, with a seemingly high level of Lesbianism - I guess that's the intersection between women, "compassion" and people who like animals better than humans, since animals are "cute" AND generally "less dangerous"). Not exactly the "safer place for a man to volunteer" that you're looking for.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 02:33 AM
2

Funny thing. Women complain that they "never know which man might be a psycho" and then, in the same breath, complain about men objectifying women, since men "never know which woman might be a psycho". This thought pattern is "ok" when women say it, but "totally insensitive/sexist/incompetent" when men utter it, as if men don't risk death, financial destruction, reputation destruction, familial destruction, or destruction of internal peace and calm when interacting with a female psycho. Outcome:…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 05:42 PM
1

You're still operating under the flawed assumption that I don't already know what you're stating, don't already understand what you're saying and don't already act accordingly. You're arguing in support of the feminism side of things, like they're the "underdogs". They're not and haven't been in decades. If we're going to turn this into a debate about monolithic groups (where no monoliths actually exist), I'm arguing that men are the true "underdogs" and deserve the same consideration that women…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 05:01 PM
1

I interpret this as the data set for analysis is 100 years worth of data...Not a study completed 100 years ago. I'm hoping your comment was sarcasm.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 08:26 PM
1

I agree with much of what you stated. That being said, men experience physical pain, daily, (the death of a thousand tiny cuts and some truly massive cuts, lost fingers, amputations frequently) as a result of being more involved in physical labor and generally riskier jobs. This should not be minimized, suppressed or "eradicated". It can be said that there's no comparison, but that's usually said by the self-interested demographic group, itself, (conflict of interest) who would benefit most (fro…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 04:02 PM
-10

And you felt your reply was necessary because...why? (Other than to be a trolling moron?) I did not dismiss the morons in the linked thread or let them off the hook in any way. I do think it's important to keep things in perspective and context. Again, I stated my opinion, dumbass. And, if you didn't want to a "lecture", you didn't have to read it, moron. Sorry if I didn't satisfy all YOUR specific, individual expectations.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:52 AM
2

Ummm... Human issues affect everyone. Violence affects ALL humans, despite differences in the manifestation of the violence and who's primarily affected by the violence. To say "some people don't experience violence" based solely on gender is patently false and really dumb. That's just cherry-picking how far down into the weeds one wants to get.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:47 AM
5

They refuse to accept the idea that anyone wasn't born a women can have the slightest idea what it's like to be a woman, and frankly, as far as that goes, I can't find any flaw in their argument. I can find big flaws in their argument. There are events that occur to people, in life. People of both genders. Same (or very similar, but still unique) events, resulting in different perspectives and different stories created about the indicated event. I don't need to think like a woman to understand p…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 12:19 AM
-14

I wasn't "correcting" the sub. I was supplying my opinion, relevant to the discussion (in parallel), but still my own opinion. I supplied my opinion for the sub's consideration. While sub may have only been referring to a small segment of the overall demographic, there are 330 million (known) people in the US. Studies and Polls are routinely "verified" as "representative" with sample sizes as few as 1,000 respondents. (I find that difficult to believe, but that's not my day job). Also, my commen…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:12 PM
-18

Statistically, not everyone can be black hearted. Life is a series of nested distributions, infinite layers deep, when viewed through the lens of statistical and mathematical analysis. In fact, I believe there are, in gross demographic numbers, far more good people than "black hearted demons". Not saying "black hearted demons" don't exist. They surely do. But the anecdotal evidence, if you truly look in an unbiased manner, "for" the existence of larger numbers of decent people, is highly obvious…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 09:30 PM
1

Couldn't really care much less about one morons notions of what qualifies as ironic or not. It doesn't sound like you're even a US citizen. So why do you feel so confident in commenting on our society's issues? Why don't you stick to addressing your own society's issues. Bye!
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:59 PM
1

I understand that you're a moron who lives in gross superficialities, generalities, and overall cluelessness.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:02 PM
1

Okay, so it was an "honest debate" when you were insulting me, just not when I'm insulting you right back? Got it. Moron.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 03:45 AM
0

It's okay. You can go back to contemplating the nature of frozen water (staring endlessly at ice cubes, in case you were unsure what I meant). Apologies for "bothering you". I prefer to talk to intellectually mature adults, anyway.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 09:11 PM
2

Good to know, for awareness purposes.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 09:09 PM
1

I know plenty of women, personally, and also have eyes to see the public "at large", for additional anecdotal evidence. The definition of skimpy covers a lot of ground - athletic wear to evening gowns. I didn't say "dressed like whores", which is what I presume you seemed to interpret "skimpy" as. That's really YOUR problem, not mine, since my definition of "skimpy" simply means showing more skin than the average daily garb. Perhaps you should clarify the language before you make shitty assumpti…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 05:04 PM
1

By the way, I don't believe you. By the way, you don't have to and my life will continue just as it was. I understand that, but dressing in skimpy clothing isn't one of them for women. I'm guessing that you don't know many women? I don't believe that you do understand that. You do realize that the word "most", as it relates to a statistical distribution, means everything between 50% +1 all the way to 100% - 1? That covers a distance of 50% - 2. Math isn't your strong suit, is it? This is ironic,…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:49 PM
1

Mathematically and statistically, there are things that ARE done by "most" of a demographic group. It's literally the studies of Anthropology and Mathematics. For your notion to be true, we'd all need to do nothing permanently. Otherwise, there's GOING TO BE A DISTRIBUTION of outcomes. So, yes, you still sound like a moron to me, if you can't grasp that concept. All you look at are superficialities, never looking beyond the surface. It makes you sound moronic. By the way, I don't hate women. Nev…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:26 PM
1

Uhh... Never said ALL Women... THAT'S what makes you a moron, moron. (Also the excessive overuse of the word Misogyny. That also makes you sound like a moron). Misogyny this, misogyny that. Here misogyny, there misogyny. You're a one-trick moron. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:09 PM
1

You sound like a moron to me, so I guess we're all set.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 01:58 PM
1

Because it hasn't been used in decades, having been replaced by slackwear.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 01:56 PM
2

OMG...Your entire coalition of Liberal morons are the absolute Gold Medalists in the Perpetual Victimhood competition. And the Silver Medalists, too. Pot meet Kettle, dumbass. There's exactly 1 "really", but hey keep on Moron'ing, bud. Tell me again how Polio has been "eradicated". You're funny.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 11:25 PM
2

It's not good for civilization, though. Agreed. Just because (many) men can survive it better than women, it is still a distribution. Not every man can do the "loner" thing and be cool with it. I simply think we're better together, than alone, as a society. Yes, there are prices for pair-bonding, but it's a Risk-Benefit situation. Also, if the women destroy the place, it doesn't really work out well for us men, either. Some things go "boom" when they aren't properly maintained.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 11:21 PM
2

Only a moron would buy into the Dunning-Krugger effect and repeat it among society, claiming "iT's sCieNce!" and subsequently claiming Polio has been made "extinct" by anyone...
/r/MensRights11/10/22 11:13 PM
3

The Dunning-Krugger effect? And your calling another human being "dim". You're a moron. All the dimness is YOURS and yours alone.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:53 PM
2

The WHO is part of the UN which Tax Payers have been funding for decades. I'd be perfectly okay with some of the other Member Nations carrying the load for a while, and housing/hosting the UN in THEIR country, instead of sucking all the money out of the US Taxpayer, decade after decade ad infinitum.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:51 PM
3

OMG... This moron still thinks that smallpox and polio are extinct. Haven't paid much attention to news coming out of New York (or the Siberian Permafrost), apparently? You're funny. I'm laughing AT you, not with you. One of the fundamental tenets of science is that NOTHING is really ever "eradicated", "extinct" ("maybe" certain wildlife) or "destroyed" (only changed into another form), but hey, keep spinning that REALLY dumb take.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:57 PM
1

By the way, fwiw, they'll take any warm bodies regardless of the person's "identity" in times of war. This is well-documented throughout history.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 06:22 PM
0

That's your take-away? Our society is doomed.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 06:19 PM
2

I recall the story, but I don't recall her talking her own life. I remember that she wrote a detailed synopsis, either on social media or a book...I'll have to look that up again. If you still have the link, that would work too.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 06:15 PM
55

It's not going to stop until a person's wallet is guarded just as jealously as a woman's genitalia, ego, honor and safety. Money doesn't have anywhere near the same criticality. As in, "It's just money".
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:46 PM
1

It does crack me up when people tell you what you do or don't believe: like they own real estate in your brain like you're too dumb to realize your own thoughts Or like they're some sort of Jedi, telling you "These aren't the druids you're looking for" while force-waving their hands mesmerizing everyone. Unfortunately for such morons, they very likely don't own ANY real estate (let alone in your head), are very likely moronic idiots themselves and, unsurprisingly, don't have any magic Jedi power…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:40 PM
3

Doubt it, but good luck with that if you want that many unapologetically hyper-neurotic humans surrounding you.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:54 PM
0

Ah...Trying to pitch me, then? Maybe another day. Not in the mood for that discussion.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:43 PM
6

I've often suspected that the population may wink out of existence, with a wimper, if women controlled every part of the generational reproductive processes: Pair-bonding + Reproductive rights + Child rearing. Gynocentry here we come, whether we like it or not.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:41 PM
1

Thank you bro! Hope you're having a great one.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:37 PM
1

Yeah. Won't work here. Good idea or bad idea doesn't matter. It simply won't work.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:36 PM
5

Not so sure about that, but certainly lean towards believing that. Nevertheless, the price is paid by everyone, not just women.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:33 PM
1

If you know all that, then good for you. I guess my comment was for all the redditors who don't.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:29 PM
0

Not sure I agree, but you do you. The appearance of equality isn't always true equality.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:27 PM
2

Not saying they dress this way every day. I bet if someone looked in your closet, you'd have a skimpy, sexy outfit with inches of dust on it. Tell me I'm wrong or shut up.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:25 PM
1

It's only really a recent trend that women are wearing Slackwear. T-shirts, hoodies, sweat pants. Women use to care more about their presentation. So did men. Large swaths of society now just "don't bother" for a variety of reasons. Also, it seems that trans men and trans women didn't get the message and dress how they "think" their adopted gender would dress, but from like 10 years ago or more.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:23 PM
1

Declaring it unconstitutional would require 2 things: Someone to sue (seems that's already been done) And it has to make it through umpteen layers of courts, all the way to the SCOTUS. That takes lots of time, lots of money and lots of persistence. Even then, the SCOTUS must decide whether to consider it or not. OR Congress could pass a law. Same large amounts of time, large amounts of money and large amounts of persistence.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:16 PM
1

All other factors considered, it's not entirely clear to me that was a "step in the right direction". Not saying it wasn't, but not saying it was, either.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:11 PM
1

If you wanted the full version, you should have read the full version. The full version includes those pesky little things called "details". This isn't the complaint department and there's nothing "usual" about the "details" that I've outlined. You sound kinda' like an intellectually lazy moron, but then who knows? Maybe I'm mistaken about that. Still, I'm reasonably intuitive, so I doubt it. Since you sound like an intellectually lazy moron, I'll answer accordingly: No, the government doesn't h…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 06:37 AM
3

When has equality and equity EVER been "low on his list of priorities" (unless the optics wouldn't look favorable for him). He's like a broken record, constantly repeating equality and equity every 2nd word. His "opposition" must not have been "that compelling" or it was simply rhetoric to keep his base happy. You know, that kind of opposition where he says it sorta' emphatically, but not REALLY emphatically (because he doesn't really care about it). That kind of "opposition"?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 05:49 AM
1

Speaking the words...then doing nothing to advance it.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:36 AM
21

The unfortunate fact is, though, that we're just as likely to go into our caskets alone, if no one is willing to cross the divide. It's all connected, even if we're not.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:33 AM
3

No worries, bro.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:57 AM
9

You mean the congress that's been in a non-stop impasse/deadlock for decades? That one? I don't think I'm gonna hold my breath for that to happen any time soon. Biden speaks out of both sides of his dumb, cognitively- impaired mouth. Says he wants it, but is seemingly a-ok with it being removed from the recently reviewed/passed NDAA.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:53 AM
5

I'm pretty sure that was a canned response by an automated bot, "trying" to be funny, but I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:50 AM
6

Arguing with ideological morons won't change their minds. Just know that there are many who agree with your stance, as it is medically/scientifically valid. The ideological morons are making cultural arguments, not scientific ones. You're not even on the same page with the ideological morons to be able to have an actual debate.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:47 AM
4

You've confirmed that you're a moron. That's about it.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:43 AM
4

So, let me get this straight... The majority of the evidence is "shattered" by the minority of the evidence? How many instances or exceptions does that minority need to top to "shatter" the plurality of evidence that supports obvious anecdotal (and medical) observations? You sound like a really "smart-sounding" idiot.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:40 AM
3

I'd like to see your "proof", or YOU'RE just another moron on the internet who believes what they want to believe and not what they're is good reason to believe. Where's your proof, sealioning moron?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:36 AM
6

Oh boy. Found the moron.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:32 AM
2

Wouldn't that be BSIP? /s
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:31 AM
2

They only send the Draft notices to the people ALREADY on the list. YOU have to PUT YOURSELF on the list for many jobs, as they REQUEST (demand really) your Registration Number on the application. Civil Service jobs, government jobs and many others ALL require your registration number or your application stops before it even gets started.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:23 AM
6

This is one lottery that people aren't so quick to win.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:16 AM
31

Proof is in the pudding. There's no universal registration in the pudding, despite many opportunities.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:15 AM
46

Seems like a "Sophie's choice"...Bad or worse. Not sure which is the bad and which is the worse, but neither one seems great. Volunteer seems to work, when there aren't bullets flying. Probably doesn't work nearly as well once they do start zipping past.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:13 AM
-1

It seems that your less-developed moron brain is stumbling to get out what you really mean, despite my completely debunking your not-very-well-defined idealistic notion. Keep "trying" to get it out there, though. Kudos for "trying". Perhaps those hundreds of people were simply "smiling and nodding" sheeple, who were looking for a quick exit.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:32 AM
-4

Then why would one be a trans woman at all, if they don't want all the trappings that go with it? I've seen plenty of trans women and, while I don't have an exact count, they do seem to like the skimpy, sexy outfits as much as any other woman. The plurality of women have a skimpy dress that makes them feel better about themselves - aka sexy. By the way, if I didn't already mention it, I care about your experience, but I care about mine, about a million times more, than I care about yours.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:24 AM
-1

No moron. If you want to make a point, in a debate (this is a platform for active debate, if I'm not mistaken), then either get it out there, or simply remain quiet. Sounds more like you're not making your point eloquently or simply not understanding the nature of the debate or the platform you're "attempting" to make it on.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:17 AM
0

🤣🤣🤣...I don't think they'd appreciate you "gendering" them that way. Did you read the post at all?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:14 AM
1

Yes you can displace jobs that aren't being done. By doing them for free or incurring new taxpayer debt, on top of still needing to fund, recruit and fill the military ranks.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:12 AM
2

Ok. What's your point, then?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:08 AM
1

No, I didn't miss anything. I just simply explained why your idea won't work. The offer to the defaulters is: join the military, as a doctor with debt forgiven over time (based on term of service), or join the local jail/prison, as an inmate (based on the amount defaulted). You gotta read the fine print of your Student Loan Agreements. Just because they DON'T always prosecute in a timely manner (or at all) in times of peace, doesn't mean they WON'T in times of need. During the Iraq "conflict", m…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:03 AM
4

I felt this in my beard. Attacked! /s
/r/MensRights11/10/22 01:48 AM
11

The military medical is already filled by Student Loan defaulters when the draft is in effect. I presume it's probably very similar for other jobs in the military. Architects, engineers, drafters, and any other job that requires college-level educations. Just hit up the defaulters, since it's easier to write off a "bad" debt than incur a new one. What you're suggesting won't work because, as I mentioned, there's plenty of defaulters with "bad debt". Why incur new debt? This is how financiers and…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:58 AM
1

Kinda' the reason we got here: intellectual laziness, but okay. Here goes: The government is essentially like a bipolar child, suffering from Cognitive Dissonance, trying to fix everything for everyone and doing a really crappy job of it.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:48 AM
11

A wound to the leg may not be a disqualifier, once recuperated. Just ask the Draft dodgers during the Vietnam era. Flat feet or other foot-related injuries are a disqualifier. Can't walk? Then you're more of a liability than an asset. At least that WAS the rationale. Not sure if that still holds today. Probably.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:42 AM
16

Although the army has seen a 25% decrease in recruitment lately. Go figure.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:37 AM
26

Well, for men at least. Women? Not so much. It's true that it's been an old artifact since we've gone to an "all volunteer" model.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:09 AM
14

Age only matters in times of peace, not in times of conflict. Just ask the Ukranians.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:09 AM
104

Seems like there'll probably be a whole lot of "inadvertent" gun shot injuries to a whole lot of feet should the draft ever become necessary again. But at least they can wear their skimpy, sexy outfits to feel better about themselves while they recuperate.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:04 AM
5

You too!
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:46 PM
6

Happy Menday to you!
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:14 PM
1

What about all the informal, non-regulatory cultural influences, that the government "fails to act upon", due to asserted "lack of standing", ideological differences or simple cowardice? Big Tech has become a Big Tyrant and government, through an impasse, has "failed to act" on the loopholes created by the government decades ago.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 07:22 PM
1

Deny you? Ummm...What you're referring to is mostly socially/culturally based (with the tacit "wink and nod" approval of portions of the government, with the collusion of the MSM/Big Tech). While this fallacy-filled cultural trend may be growing and making significant in-roads into the government, the government still incentivizes men and women to participate in childbirth. Passed decades ago and never "rescinded"...Actually increased over time. It's definitely a prime example of the Fed having …
/r/MensRights10/10/22 06:51 PM
3

Admiral Ackbar; "IT'S A TRAP!" /s
/r/MensRights09/10/22 02:43 AM
7

To earn enough money to pay court-ordered Alimony and Child Support, and still be able to pay for their own existence and maybe...maybe...a tiny amount of discretionary funds to do something... cough...ahem... fun.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:12 PM
1

No big surprise. From what I can interpret, Liberals and Lefties suffer from both an ignorance of basic logic and an ignorance of basic arithmetic, let alone the advanced versions of them. Also an ignorance of basic reality.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:53 PM
5

Physical abuse by a woman is typically a response to physical abuse by their partner. Nice equivocation. There are no organically-grown, naturally-occurring psychopathic/sociopathic, crazy women, apparently. Still the man's fault. Facts don't support the absence of women who are batshit crazy from being told they're "simply right", "perfect as they are", and the "better" gender, by their simple existence, for the duration of multiple entire generations. Especially, the most recent generations "m…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:26 AM
1

well competence hierarchies are normal but they tend to be power corrupted... Ok, so work on disrupting the artificially implemented power concentrations. They're instituted by flawed humans who've been delegated some authority. One doesn't have to scrap the entire system to do that, just fix what's already existing when that's the case. Fix it where it is found.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:20 PM
1

True. One of the exceptions, but not the "rule". Women do tend to natively be natural caregivers, as part of the maternal instinct. Based on the "Woke mob" rules, when the ditch-digging, bricklaying, sewer maintenance, manufacturing and physical-labor-based jobs reach 50/50 gender participation, then men will be one step closer to equality and equity. (Oh, and when nursing is 50/50, too).
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:14 PM
6

She had the nerve to complain about infantilizing men when all women are infantilized 24/7/365... She also had the nerve to complain about infantilizing men when all women are infantilizing their children 24/7/365 and passing on the stupid to following generations. Root Cause Analysis is a real thing.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:17 PM
1

It's all political now. Everything has been politicized...Movies, TV, Sports, the workplace... Just like the lefties wanted. Just wait... Whatever you enjoy doing will be politicized next, if it isn't already... Socialism is a virus worse than COVID. By the way, how does this relate to Men's Rights, you ask? The Socialists are the ones welcoming the feminist morons and misandrists into their coalitions "open arms".
/r/MensRights06/10/22 04:37 PM
3

New York isn't a rural non-minority area and the Conservatives aren't the ones passing Bail Reform laws. Sorry moron, but you got your story wrong.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:46 AM
10

Facts! Also...Happy Cake Day!
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:01 AM
6

Or embrace your 2A rights. Guns beat knives, from across the room, unless knives can be thrown in FPS. To deal with big, bad monsters, be a bigger, badder monster (then return to your non-aggressive self, utilizing self-discipline).
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:58 AM
-1

Kinda' makes me wonder who the victims and the mothers of the victims voted for in the last election. If they voted for the current moron-in-chief, then they ultimately proverbially "shot themselves in the foot". Sorry, not sorry for saying so.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:53 AM
6

This is what you get when you trust immature, youthful human beings (and grown adult morons, know as liberals and leftists, who should know better), who have little or no experience with anything, let alone running an entire society or managing cultural matters, with running an entire society and managing cultural matters. I'm all for education and training, but when the trapped knowledge, experience and wisdom of the older generations is discarded, wholesale, the outcomes are RARELY ever going …
/r/MensRights06/10/22 12:55 AM
2

Normalizing "being your authentic self" when being your authentic self means "you're perfect just the way you are". No need to change, improve, grow, adjust... Just "be your authentic self". 24x7x365. Nevermind that NO ONE gets to be their authentic self ALL the time. Hence, the reason behind having a Public persona and a Private persona. You get to be whatever the hell you want, in your Private life. You share the public square with the rest of society and statistically not all of the rest of s…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:22 PM
1

Doubtful. Individual preferences and individual selection, based on self-image and unmitigated/unrestrained self-interest, will continue to cause concentrations and an intransigent lack of diversity, no matter how hard the lefties try to push the "square peg through the round hole". Remember, the typical distribution of women has a larger segment that lean towards white collar jobs where they don't have to do anything Hot, Sticky, Smelly, Icky, Gross, Dirty or lift anything too heavy. While the …
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:00 PM
12

Another form of "Intersectionality" - Toxic humans, who happen to be, simultaneously, by dint of birth, masculine or feminine.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:43 PM
2

Speak up, positively and affirmatively, alongside like-minded people, organize (this is what they do, albeit in a "Zero Sum Game" manner where someone must lose for them to win) and ignore the negative crap. Don't go negative and attempt to "destroy" those who don't agree with you. Speak your positive message "in spite" of what the negative dissenters push. If they yell, yell louder than them.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 08:01 PM
6

The Men's Rights Movement goes back to the 1960's (at least, maybe even further back). The MRM/MGTOW/Red Pill evolutions are simply new incarnations of a movement that has existed for a long time, no matter how limited its reach/distribution may have been. Just see the TIL sub to see what people "discovered" today. Some people are just discovering their proverbial navels, despite it being there for decades.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:53 PM
2

Well stated. Upvoted.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:47 PM
1

Hey, do you have PhD's or medical licenses? What are your creds? I'm just curious if you're some rando Marilyn Manson/Chris Cuomo fan-girlz or actually have a higher aspiration/purpose in mind.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 01:18 AM
1

Self-improvement, trade schools and ignoring as many toxic, neurotic women (the plurality of them, it seems) as humanly possible (unless you're ordering food from them) are the answers for boys and men.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 01:03 AM
1

You've commented that you don't believe in nuclear families. You've invited me to make the case for the nuclear family. I'm not talking about single-parent households. That's your own flawed, biased interpretation. I'm saying AS A MAN, YOU PROBABLY DON'T NEED A WOMAN, moron. Never said ANYTHING about kids. Shit. Read better, bonehead. Have a great life!
/r/MensRights30/09/22 11:58 PM
1

While it's likely true that you can probably handle all the short term issues yourself, but in the long term, you have no backup...no one sharing your goal and shouldering some of the shared struggle. The force multiplier effect starts with the addition of a 2nd person to the effort. 2 people can generally create things that 1 person, alone, cannot. (Or can't do easily or timely). Now, this doesn't HAVE to be in the format of a nuclear family. It can be a friend, business partner or something el…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 11:19 PM
2

Divorcing her way to the top.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:12 PM
1

Just taking a shot in the dark, based on how I interpreted your responses. I interpreted your responses to indicate some tough times in a relationship. Interesting though that someone (me) wished you well and you rebuked it. If I was wrong, then my apologies. No matter. I still disagree with your interpretation of what nuclear families are and are not.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:31 PM
1

Well, the nuclear family is getting more toxic, as time goes on...as the moronic "Woke" crowd gets more and more of their dumb way. My empathies, brother, for what you must have gone through. I hope you're coming out the other side healing and improving in every way. You do see, however, that the "woke" crowd are implementing strategic hyper-individualism, at the cost of the nuclear family. I'm betting that the very behaviors and philosophies that cratered your marriage are the very same behavio…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:41 PM
1

I think you're fooling yourself, in a "Grass is always greener on the other side of the fence" sort of way, but maybe you are actually in the type of the nuclear family that fails to serve your interests, as a (neglected) part of the whole, even in the most minimal manner.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:48 PM
11

The term incel was coined by a woman, who desired physical intimacy AND, presumably, through either: external forces (beyond her control), internal forces (only controllable by her) OR more likely BOTH, was not able to get what she desired. IMO, she coined it with the intention of describing herself (and others like her) in an innocent, non-contentious attempt to increase her own self-awareness and belongingness (to not feel alone in her specific circumstances). It wasn't turned into the pejorat…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:39 PM
2

You're a moron: there is greater power (and diminished power, for the elites) and greater advantages (to you) to being IN a nuclear family. While it comes with an explicit price of having to compromise more (compromise is NeverZero) and tolerate the additional, local (within your bubble) neuroticism of your partner (while they consecutively tolerate yours), the benefits often (not always) outweigh the costs, even in an anecdotal, but reasonably obvious, analysis of competing priorities and of (m…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:58 PM
20

Choices, meet Consequences. Sorry, not sorry. You can say that "There shouldn't be any consequences or prices for my choices/actions", but that still doesn't make it true. The rest of the universe doesn't care about "individual opinions" on the matter. There are prices and consequences for EVERYONE'S choices. Both men and women's expectations have risen to near impossible thresholds. In addition to that, society has relaxed many standards and made them permissible (either explicitly or implicitl…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/22 06:11 AM
70

Zora, the author, is a moron. Written by a woman, with a woman's biased perspective. It's unfortunate that morons like this gain a following. Talk about spreading misinformation and disinformation. This batshit crazy author is a sexist, misandristic nut-job. The amount of copium and self-justification of these 2 women is stunning.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/22 05:59 AM
5

It's among the apex list of "stereotyping", which was "hated" by the liberals and other demographic groups, when it was done to them. So, of course, revenge kicked in and now they do it to everyone else. So much for "rising above it".
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:52 AM
2

Same thing with the word "Incel". It's meaning was manipulated maliciously to bash men. (It was originally coined by a woman, to describe herself and everyone in her self-created social platform, until the Radfems got a hold of it).
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:47 AM
1

Whatever pisses off, insults, offends or injures (think broken nails and stubbed toes) a woman, at any given time. Probably misogynistic, too (for misogynistic see definition above). /s
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:44 AM
30

He could have called the police, but it's moderately likely that HE'D be the one getting a nice pair of matching silver bracelets. So...not really an incentive for him to do that. The rest of them, on the other hand, should absolutely have called the police. But, they'll more than likely give the psycho a pass.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:58 AM
7

Sorry, not sorry. He bet on the wrong horse. Douchey liberals always cannibalize each other, since their "coalition" (at least, in the US and probably elsewhere) is comprised of demographic groups that can't stand each other (unless there's a vote coming up). The "tolerant" left doesn't tolerate the slightest imperfections in their "coalition" rank and file. "In for a penny, in for a pound": they gotta buy the ENTIRE batch of dismal, lame rhetoric, from the across the ENTIRE "coalition" whether …
/r/MensRights28/09/22 03:31 AM
7

Confusion is their desired end product. I'm, of course, referring to what constitutes "normal", for the average person, on any given day. I guess, statistically, it isn't going to work on everyone.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 03:15 AM
8

Facts!
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:08 PM
53

They've changed the plank: "Feminism is for equity". Nothing like a moving target to confuse...well, everyone.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:07 PM
1

I often curse when the family consumers do retail therapy.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:01 PM
2

Hopefully before the money is spent. Otherwise, there'll be a lot of shrugs about what to do about it.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:12 PM
1

Crappy signal or some other unexplained technical glitch. Not intentional. Deleted.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:02 PM
8

Agreed. The blatant, naked consumerism and "retail therapy" have gone berserk.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:59 PM
12

Men who don't produce become homeless and starve. Usually not a great outcome.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:55 PM
1

Don't worry, they'll just raise the taxe rates on the employed and decrease funding for Unemployment for anyone who isn't an "essential" single-mother.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:52 PM
7

Don't worry, they'll just raise the tax rates on the employed and decrease funding for Unemployment for anyone who isn't an "essential" single-mother.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:51 PM
1

By the way, I do support individual choice. If an afab wants to live their life as a male, I would say "I'm sorry. You have my greatest empathy." The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence. There are already recountings of women, who decided to live as a male, and discovered: how wrong they were about what it means to be a male and it was no easier (as it seemed from the other side of the fence). It only SEEMED that way.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:11 PM
1

Agreed. It destroys all who participate in it.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:03 PM
4

Somehow there are a lot of AFABs who don't want anything to do with the pressure of being female and feel like boys. There are a lot of humans, male and female alike, who want to avoid the pressures of life. That's a fool's errand. The pressures of life will come, whether you like it or not. Whether you want them or not. Avoiding these pressures will just delay them and give them proverbial fangs and claws, when they grow into an 800lb gorilla in your life. You can ignore them, but they're NOT g…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:01 PM
1

Also, you should care because immoral/unethical people, with no delegated authority(and usually an extremely "lite" understanding of actual law), use tech, unsupported by ACTUAL laws, to organize into a digital tyrannical mob of willfully or ignorantly misinformed, populist extra-judicial Vigilantist/Ochlocratic, denying any dissenters in their "target" their lawfully defined "Due Process", practicing "reputation destruction" and "income destruction" (read Personal Destruction) as their preferre…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 03:36 PM
1

A couple thoughts: Men are "set up from birth", in an expected pattern/lifestyle, too. And ours is one of physical labor and enduring all the shit-work. Men are ALSO subject to peer pressure, except ours is to "be protectors" and "be good providers for our families" (including the female members). Women have little such pressure or expectation to be a good provider for anyone they didn't pass out of their uterus (and receive LOTS of assistance in their struggles). This is by artifical, manipulat…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 03:09 PM
103

Radfems, and their "convinced" useful idiots, are about as dumb as a box of rocks (and not the interesting ones that Geologists have... the plain ass ones that anyone can find in their back yards). Like men have control over "all other men". They (women) don't have control over "all other women", soooo... Like men don't "white knight" for them, when the crime is obvious. They're grateful when the "white knighting" is for them, but how quickly they forget once the threat has passed. The plurality…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 12:53 AM
3

I've known both women and men, in relatively equal measure, to have used the "incapable/incompetent" excuse to transfer/foist unpleasant work on someone else's to do list. With the meteoric rise in all the "syndromes", the unrealistic need to be "transparent and authentic" 24x7 (which literally NO ONE has) and all the shaming (toxic masculinity, right?) for those who refuse to make (or take) excuses (at least, until the bandwagon ran them over), the actual pool of willing workers will dry up or …
/r/MensRights25/09/22 10:09 PM
2

Unfortunately true. And hidden behind a super thin patina of compassion and wholesomeness, just thick enough to appeal to the Useful Idiots. Who doesn't want to support "compassionate" and "wholesome" efforts? It would be "shameful" not to. So, the ones who don't show up willingly will be "shamed" into compliance. It'd be genius if it wasn't so "evil". I guess it could be "evilly genius". I feel bad for the well-meaning, but "used", Useful Idiots who will, ultimately, be very surprised when the …
/r/MensRights25/09/22 08:22 PM
2

It's hard to keep up because overwhelmingly large segments of the "social justice" movement are about disruption and creating/sowing confusion. Your confusion IS the desired "end product" so the purveyors can destroy any connection to traditional values, using Useful Idiots, to get their adversary paying attention to irrelevant crap they introduced but barely even really entirely care about. It's a "rope-a-dope", in boxing parlance: get the opponent focused entirely on what the left hands doing,…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 08:07 PM
2

I think if both the mother and father "opt in" to the whole 9 yards prior to childbirth, they should honor, and live by, that mutual decision, no matter how hard it may get. After the childbirth, any separation of either party becomes a different legal issue, covered by a different law, already in existence. I think mandatory paternity tests are a good start, as long as the man has the ability to waive it (some men aren't interested in the results). I don't think the woman should be able to waiv…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 07:07 PM
4

18 years is 6,570 days. A woman, who becomes pregnant, gets to determine a man's level of participation, with the wink & nod approval of the 1,000 lb. judicial system "enforcer", for 6,570 days of the man's life, by simply deciding in the affirmative to have the child, knowing that the court system will support her and award her (sometimes voluntary, always forced/enforced) financial support. Men have the right to willingly, voluntarily abandon their rights and self-interest or will be forced to…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 06:22 PM
2

She gets 98 days. Less than 84 days for paternal "opt out" with a minimum of 30 (but 60 would be better), I would say. The man deserves some reasonable accommodation to make a decision about his financial willingness to participate in the pregnancy, but shouldn't be given THAT much less time to decide than the woman.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:43 PM
2

There's already a process for that (AFTER the child is born). It's called Divorce. Usually favors women.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:35 PM
2

I'm talking about, specifically, the window of time (15 weeks) where the mother gets sole discretion over whether the child will be born or not. During that SAME PERIOD OF TIME, the father should get to "opt out" BEFORE the child is born, so the mother knows the FULL implications of her decision, again, BEFORE the 98 days is up.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:33 PM
19

The difference is this actually gets traction with the Useful Idiots in the current dumbed-down era.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 06:56 AM
27

Yep. If you pay attention and watch for it, it happens A LOT. Bill Burr speaks truth to bullshit and sends the bullshit running away, crying. Love it!
/r/MensRights25/09/22 06:39 AM
6

An estimated 80 Billion have been born since the beginning of history. Approximately 8 Billion are alive, today. The universe is (arguably) infinite. All of the reasons can be true, concurrently, in parallel. While one reason may top the list and be the most prevalent, with higher frequency, intensity and/or duration, there's always a very, very long list of reasons, all happening simultaneously. Some men simp for women, to the detriment of other men. Some women do the Grima Wormtongue thing. Bo…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 05:52 AM
11

I see what you did there...lol... No, seriously, men shouldn't have to be "on the hook" for 18 years, if they're not ready and don't want to be a father. Perhaps they've discovered, shortly after, that they don't really like the mother...A man isn't just a wallet with a corporeal body...a walking wallet...and shouldn't be treated as such or forced to be one.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:48 AM
0

Maybe your logic, but not mine. My logic is just fine. Maybe you should review your logic once more. Maybe the breakdown is your logic, not logic itself.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:38 AM
0

Yes, financial abortion is necessary as a men's rights issue. My reference to "laws are laws" is intended to convey a simple point - who ever is in power controls the "rights" of their population. I agree that men's rights need to be championed, just as much as women's rights are. I just don't agree that all that bs you said "needs to happen for this to work" is necessary "for it to work". It doesn't. All it needs to work is the law. Unfortunately, the law is created and then "reinterpreted" and…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:30 AM
-1

It is legal and available for women, in the plurality of states, for 98 days. It is never free - someone always pays, even if it's limited to working tax-payers. And none of this needs to be true for it to work. Laws are laws, whether you like them or not.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:44 AM
51

Women have approximately 98 days to make a decision. That decision should be based on all parties inputs. Just because there's a deadline, there's still 98 days that a man's wishes can be entirely ignored and have zero influence on the actual final outcome. If women gets the sole decision, for 98 days, men should have the ability to "opt out" financially, for 18 years. The pregnant woman should have ALL the information to make a comprehensive decision and men should have the right to be "include…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:37 AM
0

It is freely accessible, in most states, until after (average) 15 weeks +1 day.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:31 AM
62

Interesting that they never seem to do studies on "why" men start wars, only that they DO start wars. I'd bet that a not-insignificant number began with female whispers into a man's ear (the woman behind the man in power) or simply a fight "over a woman".
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:17 AM
20

Only morons are entirely unaware of the war fought between England, led by Elizabeth I, and Scotland, led by Mary Stuart Queen of Scots, just off the top of my head. You'd think that someone with this morons discretionary time and discretionary money would have figured that one out by now. History has multiple instances of warmongering women starting wars
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:06 AM
27

Diversity hire?
/r/MensRights25/09/22 12:58 AM
86

Usually, that's because they're sending "disposable" men, not "essential" women. No skin in the game.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 12:57 AM
9

And their unacknowledged, unrepentant neuroticism that relatively few seem to be calling them out for. Work on being less batshit crazy and men might stick around a little longer. Every human being, INCLUDING women, should be continuously improving their physical, mental, emotional and (optionally) spiritual selves. If they aren't committed to continuous improvement (for themselves, for their partner, for their family, their community), they may as well crawl the rest of the way into a pine box,…
/r/MensRights24/09/22 09:49 PM
3

'The Denver Basic Income Project is an opportunity to explore how the philanthropic community and the private sector can augment public support for those living in poverty, particularly our unhoused neighbors, and extend that hand up to stability,' Denver Mayor Michael B. Hancock said in a statement. Love how they make it sound like it was all philanthropy, not taxation at the business end of a proverbial (and sometimes real) weapon.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:18 AM
3

I see what you did there...
/r/MensRights23/09/22 08:35 PM
7

It didn't factor for things like job flexibility (women would often come in late or leave early for childcare purposes), overtime (men usually did, and do, this far more frequently to supplement family income or pay child support), seasonal jobs, part-time jobs, maternity leave (men historically haven't gotten), and many more factors that simply got "overlooked" in the original study which is constantly referenced, even to this day. When adjusting for these realities, the gender wage gap narrows…
/r/MensRights23/09/22 06:55 AM
2

Yep. A tragic one, at that.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 05:37 AM
36

Anything greasy or sweaty or hot or uncomfortable...or simply gross...or uncool. Unless it's kid-related... Then, they point to it and say, "See, I do gross stuff, too".
/r/MensRights23/09/22 05:16 AM
31

The Gender Wage Gap is a myth, using ancient data (many readers today probably weren't even born when this "study" was done) in a very generalized, non-specific manner, promulgated by RadFems because it serves their narrative. This Wage Gap has been debunked by Ivy League PhD Economists (read Scientists, it is a science) many times over and this Wage Gap bullshit keeps going anyway.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 05:10 AM
1

Would you like some (extreme water consuming) avocados, sir? They're packed full of "good fats" and go great on toast. /s
/r/MensRights23/09/22 03:02 AM
24

If you ask me, all cosmetics, skin care oils, perfumes and hair products are gross pollution, especially when not in the actual service of increasing Pair-bonding. If women want to be single parents, not part of a family unit, then pay your "fair share" for your impact on Climate Change. The processes, and the water consumption, to create them. The glass and plastic containers manufactured to ship them... the entire supply chain of it...The electricity consumed. If the cosmetics are "just to mak…
/r/MensRights23/09/22 01:47 AM
16

The women want the child. It's debatable if they ever wanted the father. Just a means to an end. They're (the fathers) too much work or too much trouble. The funny thing is a not-insignificant percentage of women get the kid they wanted (by accident or by treachery, doubt the accidents though), arrogantly ditch the father, and then get "buyers remorse", after the kid arrives because....you guessed it...Too much work or too much trouble. Some women are too selfish/self-interested to have a kid, b…
/r/MensRights22/09/22 02:52 AM
1

You: "EvErYonE iS bAd!:
/r/MensRights21/09/22 11:20 PM
0

I can promote who ever the hell I want. Now, you're just being a tyrannical little c*nt. You mind your business and I'll mind mine. Don't like what I post, then don't respond. Cheers, moron. By the way, you're obsession with thinking in absolutes is also known as the Black & White Fallacy. You know who thinks in absolutes? Sociopaths. Don't think like a sociopath. It doesn't become you.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 10:37 PM
0

It's okay. I've determined that you're a "big mad" whiny snowflake and am moving on. Cheers!
/r/MensRights21/09/22 06:21 PM
1

Ok. That's your experience. My experience is apparently different than yours. You do you. Have a great life.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 06:20 PM
1

Maybe you shouldn't be over-generalizing any demographic groups. Maybe I shouldn't either. However, there is absolutely nothing redeeming about Communism. Pretty safe bet that generalizing it, and any defense of it, as all bad is reasonably accurate. There are extremists in every demographic group - even conservatives. I'm not some fool to believe otherwise. Still, they're the "least worst" in the short term. In the long term, all extremists (including conservative ones) should be kept from gain…
/r/MensRights21/09/22 04:25 PM
0

Sure sounded like you're pretty triggered by my thoughts on communist morons. Sure you aren't "in the closet"? No matter anyway. If you actually read my first comments, then you would know that I don't give conservatives a pass either. I don't like extremists of any stripe. I simply dislike communist moron extremists far more than conservative extremists. So, your comments are useless and unnecessary. So, just maybe, read my comments a little better, without applying your bias to what I actually…
/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:39 PM
1

You could shuffle along and still get over that low bar. However, this isn't about being "better than" or "worse than". That's the Zero Sum game that the Lefties and related morons nearly constantly play and are the Gold Medalists in. As in, "My suffering is more suffering than your suffering" or (complete denial) "White Males don't suffer at all". This IS about creating a society that isn't persistently hyper-politicized, aggressive in unhealthy ways (openly created by the lefties), perpetually…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 09:48 PM
2

Neither am I. I don't think Republicans are perfect people, without mistake or error. Some of them are morons, too. There's no community devoid of morons. Some communities just have MORE OR LESS than others, but presence of morons is NeverZero in any community. By the way, I referred to Conservatives, not Republicans. While there's lots of overlap, these are distinct demographic groups. Conservatives also have some morons, just much fewer of them, by percentages. That being said, Lefties like to…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 08:59 PM
2

Nice job turning half the country into one big monolith. Moron.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 08:10 PM
2

You've been listening to too many Leftie social media silos and bubbles. I've never demanded anyone salute the flag or smeared gay or lesbian people. People who are convicted of harming kids deserve every bit of disdain and punishment that the judicial system can mete' out. But, I guess you can certainly mentally masturbate to your brand of crazy. I can't stop you from being a moron. So, let me get this straight: You (an arrogant moron) think that you're smart enough to know better than the bill…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 08:08 PM
2

Umm...Burning the flag has BEEN illegal since the successful passage of the Flag Act. Maybe you might want to look that up. McCarthyism was over a half-century ago. What does any of your response have to do with current issues? By the way, whatever inappropriate past happenings occurred, the left is viscerally, violently attempting to destroy any dissent and any dissenters. You giving them a pass will put you one step closer to being a slave.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 07:42 PM
4

I will say that conservatives, while they're not perfect by any stretch of the imagination, are more likely to leave people alone and let some things simply be "water under the bridge". Conservatives don't generally accuse anyone of "hate speech".
/r/MensRights20/09/22 06:34 AM
3

Fair enough. Cheers, friend.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:50 AM
3

Don't be dense/daft. I'm not talking about actually competition, as in some sort of race. I said there wouldn't be any competition. As in, women would literally be the only group being "considered" and "evaluated" for the new statistics about rape. Sorry if I confused you there.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:46 AM
13

Read it again and do the math. This is called logic. The 100% is largely irrelevant, since they would be the only group remaining. There wouldn't be any men, so the women wouldn't have anyone else to target/rape, other than other women. Females can be, and often are, rapists, in lower volumes/ratios/frequencies than men. They do exist, only in slightly smaller numbers. The disparities have been shown to be much narrower than previously thought. Men are typically stoic and under-report all crimes…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:34 AM
3

A whole bunch of those shit-talkers live here in the US. I'm sorry we have morons in our midst insulting one of your cultural heroes, just because they (the morons) can't get past their own arrogant egos.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:11 AM
3

I think there's a "You were warned" in there, every so often.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:08 AM
26

If all men disappeared, then "woman on woman" rape would go up dramatically, becoming 100% (perhaps a slightly lower "volume"), due to the absence of men to single out and focus the blame on. There would be no competition for "top rapists".
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:21 AM
4

Yep. Agree completely.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 02:15 AM
1

Liberal/Leftie "Tolerance" is actually concentrated, high potency, toxic in-tolerance...Basically "hate" in sheep's clothing, that they've all agreed is permissible and justifiable if (and only if) it's "against conservatives", with an apex "hate" for White, Male, Christian Nationalists (who actually live this country and it's flag). Whatever inadequacies this country has, I'll listen to a "racist" conservative, before I'll listen to a moron liberal/Leftie. Their brand of craziness comes with fa…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 12:18 AM
29

They could have just said "All humans lie" (even if it's just to themselves) and left it at that. That would be accurate and cut through all the bs attempts at lame humor. Nothing like giving women a pass on their crappy safetyist behaviors and allowing them to actually have preferences when men are being destroyed for their "sexist" preferences.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 05:03 AM
-1

Yes. Yes, it does. If we're going to go down the really dumb, immoral, unethical rabbit-hole of comparing individual or group privileges, then yes, it does exist.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:07 PM
10

They're perfectly willing to turn an entire demographic groups into some monolithic "dominant cultural group", as a collective, even as they weep, cry, stomp their feet and scream at the sky that they're "nOt a MonOlItHiC GrOuP!" and we must "ReSpEcT mY InDiViduAliTy!" Effing hypocritical morons.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:01 PM
3

They're perfectly willing to turn an entire demographic groups into some monolithic "dominant cultural group", as a collective, even as they weep, cry, stomp their feet and scream at the sky that they're "nOt a MonOlItHiC GrOuP!" and we must "ReSpEcT mY InDiViduAliTy!" Effing hypocritical morons.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:00 PM
2

In addition to man and/or Republican, please don't forget: Racists, Sexists, Ableists, Transphobes, and Xenophobes, because if you're one of these, you're probably ALL of these. /s
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:39 AM
3

Men don't do good things, if MSM is too be believed. Men only do bad things. The good things men do are "transparent" because it's "what men are suppose to do". Like it's "expected" that we're suppose to do good things and any deviation will be put through a megaphone/loudspeaker. Raise the Klaxons! Garden Gnomes, the Lucky Charms Leprechaun and gremlins are the only males that actually do any good things, in RadFems minds. Even those are suspect and should be treated with high levels of distrus…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:31 AM
2

Organic Righteousness. Men didn't get together, in some back room, and plan this outcome/manifestation of reality. Patriarchy assumes that men are in power, because men suppress women's efforts at every turn. The truth of the matter is that women, generally-speaking, have a very different (or entirely absent) relationship with the concepts of "choices", "prices" and "personal accountability". If you want something, it's not going to deliver itself to your door. Success requires effort. They're c…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 03:54 AM
10

I don't think that's the kind of Role Reversal he was referring to. What you're referring to are roles displacing heroic males with women. I think what he's referring to is the type of role where a woman dies for an honorable cause or to save a man (a typical plot line for men, rescuing women). Of course, that may not be what he meant. Perception is reality.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:52 PM
24

"Y: The last man" got canceled for not following the gynocentric model in Hollywood. What?!?! Women behaving badly? SIMPLY FAKE AND SEXIST! MISOGYNY! /s
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:52 PM
1

I'd might stop watching them if I knew any. Stop watching podcasts and take a chance on real life.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 05:08 PM
0

True...Yet, there are respectful ways to issue criticism and then there was this sh1tty, snotty, disrespectful, ungrateful humans way of issuing criticism. And, people who love you, won't disrespect you in this manner, unless they're cognitively impaired level stupid. Also, this was the proverbial "initial shot". If nothing is said or done, the next round will be even more disrespectful, and so on. Not all morons are disrespectful. That being said, the ones who are disrespectful will learn a few…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:15 PM
5

Sure. That's all true. There's also "self respect" and "self worth". Sounds like you might want to explore some of these ideas, instead of being walked all over like a door mat. Times when I'm not an a**hole: when there's no reason. That being said, I'm perfectly capable and willing to be an a*hole when there *IS a legitimate reason. Sorry if you don't think you deserve dignity and respect. Hopefully, some day you will recognize that you DO deserve those things. Until then, make sure to ask all …
/r/MensRights15/09/22 02:28 AM
-1

You say that like it's a bad thing. Perhaps, it's not always. And... nothing is permanent. Everything is temporary. Even being canceled or blacklisted. Human memories are short and people want to be "compassionate" and "forgiving". "Permanent cancelation" is neither compassionate, nor forgiving. Who knows? Maybe this IS changing for the worse. 🤷 Sometimes, if you stand for principles, you may find yourself standing alone. Doesn't mean it's wrong, just that it's not "popular". I feel no compuncti…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 01:44 AM
-4

I hope she has a job, cause she's packing bags and getting the hell out (if it were my daughter, under my roof). Yes, she the a**hole.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:16 AM
4

Hard to imagine the level of idiocy and lunacy required to tell 72+ % of the society (60% white + 12% Asian = 237 million) people that they need not apply. That leaves the roughly 92.4 million "oppressed", who'll be "on the hook" to provide enough tax money to fund a society of 330 million. Unless the goal ISN'T to keep ALL 330 million happy and healthy. Tax rates would have to increase dramatically, to like 10,000%, just to fund the "Medicare For All" that they want, too. Hell, screw all the rh…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:50 PM
23

The internet is, among many other things, the planetary "changing room" where you get to "try things on" and "try things out", anonymously, before "going public" with them. The internet is also the largest conduit for "collectively organizing", so people can do a quick "sanity check" by seeing/testing if their particular brand of insanity is "trending", and being echoed elsewhere, or if their brand of insanity is solely their own craziness. Trending insanity will gain traction, while solo insani…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 03:50 AM
-3

However, a strong economy has a passive effect of providing better living standards for people, more jobs, more affordable housing, better facilities etc. Ummmm...maybe Passive in the collective aggregate. But even that's debatable. A strong economy is definitely Direct and Active individualistically and at the small group (aka "Family Unit") level. And probably at the collective aggregate level, as well.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 04:57 PM
-7

It's substanically more left with a strong dose of socialism? Not being able to read/interpret the language: I'm reasonably sure that you're reasonably correct!
/r/MensRights12/09/22 04:53 PM
1

While both men and women can, and do, use violence against each other, men’s violence against women is far more common, less justified, and more destructive than women’s violence against men. Violence is rarely ever "justified". Like "Big Foot sightings" level rare. It is simply not "criminalized" under certain circumstances. It's wholly immoral and unethical, no matter the circumstances, but may not be illegal or criminal. Violence is rarely ever "more destructive" or "less destructive". It is …
/r/MensRights12/09/22 05:50 AM
6

As a man, I see the goodness of other men and celebrate it. I acknowledge the man/men and his/their good deeds when I witness them. I remember those good men and their good deeds. I celebrate the good deeds of all humans when I witness them and, with gratitude, I say, "Thank you". Just because it isn't in a MSM headline, or is interpreted/reported poorly (or politically), doesn't mean it isn't witnessed, transparently/accurately, by those who were present. Just remember that the MSM isn't a very…
/r/MensRights11/09/22 11:45 PM
5

Women can be perpetrators, too... not just innocent little victims, like they make themselves out to be. Stay strong, brother. You're in the middle of the storm, but literally everything is temporary...The storm won't last forever.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 05:09 AM
4

Not sure if she's MRA, exactly. She may be a "Law and Order" Humanitarian. However, I'll take "Law and Order" Humanitarian over moronic Liberals any day. At least they aren't "rhetorically fixed" and moronically inflexible. L&O Humanitarians can be worked with/reasoned with and don't call "Reason and Logic" and Science (math) Racist, Sexist, Xenophobic and whatever other -ist/-ism that's "trending" on social media.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 10:42 PM
2

It is interesting how, when a man is driven to the extreme of violence, no one even looks into whether the woman's "leaky faucet" neurosis might have played a role in goading the man towards violence, as a matter of Root Cause Analysis. It's almost like the man's failure to infinitely endure the woman's "leaky faucet" neurosis/passive-aggressive abuse (or find some other socially acceptable "venting process) that's the greater offense than the woman's actual toxic neurosis. Even WITH a socially …
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:36 PM
2

True. Reality is usually never as good as the fantasy. Not even for Radfems dumb version of "winning" (that's not really actually winning).
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:18 PM
8

What she did is Prima Facie unethical, immoral and does not dispute causing tangible injuries, whether she "meant to" or not. Intent is largely irrelevant, in this one. She should rot beneath the prison, if you ask me. Sometimes, courts do get verdicts wrong. Society should shun this bitch until her dying day. And take away her driver's license, to boot. If you can't control your vehicle, to the degree that you hit 2 people on the wrong side of the road, you're either drunk or it was intentional…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:19 AM
1

I do believe in natural attrition, for the moment. May change later, as new information comes to light, but that's my current working theory. However, we still need pair-bonding, marriages and children conceived/born, at minimum replacement rates, for humanity to continue. Which means all the radical feminist bs is counterproductive. It is possible for 2 competing demographic groups to BOTH win, assuming both parties play fairly and are committed to Win-Win. Radfems are only concerned about fema…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 12:11 AM
1

Bye. Have a great day.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 05:46 AM
1

Why are you explaining? You can simply stop replying. 👍
/r/MensRights05/09/22 05:44 AM
1

Then why'd you post in the first place? Just to get your judgemental screed out there, with no desire for any actual pushback? You obviously had something to say, based on the book-length post you made. Making an argument/debate usually comes with some "expansion" on your ideas, since there's likely more to it than you've actually considered. Unless you're some kind of God. Was your judgemental screed actually an edict from God? Doubtful. By the way, it may be weird territory to YOU, but you're …
/r/MensRights05/09/22 05:08 AM
1

Because I'm a different person. I'm in a different part of the distribution known as "the people who responded to you". To be sure, I did address some items that were not specific you're ideas in your post. Those were me expanding. Since this is a public forum, I get to do that. And, it's true that written words DO leave lots of room for misconstruction, misunderstanding, and misattribution. Why are you surprised that 2 different people might have 2 different opinions? Also, just a note: I never…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:14 AM
1

That's possible. It's also possible that I'm picking up on cues that you aren't even aware you're saying, due to implicit bias.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:50 AM
3

I suspect much of why people stay single is from 2 factors: the height of the hurdle, which is another way of saying costs, as well as the costs of being "successful" once the hurdle is overcome. If the hurdle seems too "high", and getting "higher", increasing numbers of people will simply forego any attempt. And, if successfully hurdled, the next obvious decision is whether or not to have kids, that will cost upwards of $250,000 dollars (for the first one, slightly less for subsequent kids). Th…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:48 AM
1

I suspect the 46 down votes you collected might be a "clue". Another "clue" might be the 12 up votes I collected on my post. In fairness, this is a Men's Rights sub, but still...
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:33 AM
1

By the way, since you asked, you're projecting your (self-)Righteous worldview and virtue to the rest of the "sisterhood", who may actually not deserve it, as it's a distribution, just like everything else.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:31 AM
1

I suspect the 46 down votes you collected might be a "clue". Another "clue" might be the 12 up votes I collected on my post. In fairness, this is a Men's Rights sub, but still...
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:28 AM
13

Would it surprise you to know that you may be the "exception to the rule" and not the "rule" itself? Have you considered that you might not represent "the plurality" of modern women? Project much? I suspect you project very much, very often. I mean, you do know that everything and everyone falls into a distribution of some kind, right? Maybe you and your fiance are the lucky ones who both found someone who matches their efforts. Not everyone does. Go figure. So, statistically, there are gonna be…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 04:05 AM
3

"Eat the Rich!"...oh, wait...nix that Every future wealthy woman will eventually say. Moronic Liberals and Lefties will figure out, someday, what conservatives have been saying for decades. Unfortunately, they'll be replaced by the even more entitled, even more ignorant follow-on generations. The ever-increasing level of entitlement will likely never end. Welcome to the shitty, Leftist-led, globalist New World Order. Per Big Brother, leave your backpacks and your rights outside the door before y…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 04:00 AM
1

Just use the proper label: Gender Fluid. Man one minute, women the next, then back to man...Rinse & Repeat.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 10:08 PM
2

I knew what you meant, intuitively. I'm clarifying and expanding on what I imagine you meant, not diminishing what you said.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 05:43 PM
1

Only one of these is actually "reality". The other (meant to) is simply useless mental masturbation, unless one takes lawful action to change it.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 05:31 PM
3

I agree that he's not entirely wrong (this is the current reality), but he's not definitely not "right". From a "one-size-MUST-fit-all" (or at least MOST/ plurality/largest majority possible)" government policy perspective, either "No one" or "everyone" should be "expendable". Selective expendability isn't what the Founders had in mind, I suspect) Otherwise, you get what we have now - winners (preferrential, selective, affirmative ability to individually choose) and losers (no individual choice/…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 05:27 PM
2

You're welcome. Do great things!
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:35 PM
1

All of this presumes that women are, in fact, the more "evolved" sex and relieves them of any need to "change" or "improve", transferring all of the responsibility to "change/improve" to men. Pretty much just adds up to 1.) female arrogance/elitism/supremacy or 2.) intellectual laziness - not sure which.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 04:50 AM
0

I would question the "many" part. White Supremacy was largely dying out, organically, before the moron liberals/Leftists decided, in their (deeply questionable) infinite "wisdom" (/s), to "poke the bear". I'd be willing to bet that the White Supremacist rosters have only grown/blossomed since the moron Liberals/Leftists opened their dumb yappers. There's always some useful idiots that'll take the bait. Of course, that's EXACTLY what moron Liberals/Leftists want - more White Supremacists to point…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:25 AM
4

Happy Cake Day!
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:16 AM
7

Cracks me up when morons self-identifying as "egalitarians" (they're really not, just self-righteous legends in their own minds), resort to the mentality that someone else "must lose" for them to truly "win". Both arguments about men's and women's violence can simultaneously be objectively factual & true. Seems kinda' petty of the supposed "egalitarians" to participate in a "Win-Lose" mentality, just to make sure that the supposed "egalitarians" get the greatest "flawless" moral victory possible…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:33 AM
1

Suffering is #NeverZero... Not for anyone. Not along gender lines or any other demographic line. The intensity of suffering one might experience in life is dynamic: it changes from one point in time to another point in time. It's a dynamic distribution of varying degrees (but never zero or 100%). But suffering is subjective: one person stubs their toe and life is over, where another shows up to work with a stab wound and is ready to work through the pain. Life is hard. Get use to it. The hyper-s…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 08:32 PM
1

When it comes to boys, SOCIETY is failing. There... Fixed it. Society needs to do better. But, then, maybe that's too much to hope for, for the current moment.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:58 PM
1

For most sections of the article, the author could have replaced "human" with any gender references and the article would still be almost entirely accurate.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 12:45 AM
1

It seems more likely to me that there was some "Impossible Pork" in the bill, and I'm not referring to the porcine kind. Douchebag Liberals love to dangle "wholesome-sounding" legislation that, upon zero due diligence by the masses, will appeal widely and wildly to as many useful idiots as they can get to support it. Of course, when you look further into the fine print, there's a whole host of impossible pork attached to it. Then they get a "win" either way: if it passes, they get their Big Gove…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:29 AM
11

Come on, gents! Let’s not commit logical Fallacies. Sorry, but this hypocrisy appears in FAR more places than just PsychologyToday.com. That's just the tip of the lunatic Titanic iceberg. We’re supposed to be the rational half of the species, right? And what exactly has been the reward for being "the rational half of the species"? Getting called inaccurate names and labels? Haven't you heard? Being rational is "racist". So is Math. Math is "racist". Not so sure that being "the rational half of t…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:47 AM
2

Not to diminish your experience or your opinion - I'd bet it's a little different than all that if it's your own child, carried by a Surrogate. Also, different states have different outcomes, I'd imagine. Some states are deeply liberal and frown on single fatherhood. Do you happen to live in California? I bet they despise single fathers.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 09:42 PM
2

Never said it would be easy. Just said it can be done. Some men (not all) check all the necessary boxes/criteria to financially and emotionally be a single father.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 08:57 PM
4

Well, then make sure you do your due diligence and find a woman whose neurosis is as low as humanly possible. Ultimately, it matters little, since female neurosis can spring up any time. Sometimes, it's the neurochemical response to actual childbirth that brings out the mothers "crazy eyes". Life is an exercise in making individually acceptable compromises. Best of luck to you. You could also find a Surrogate and provide your genetic material for inclusion, so the child is actually biologically …
/r/MensRights20/08/22 05:27 PM
1

Raising a child and being a pair-bonded partner with a neurotic woman are not inextricably linked. You can do one, the other or both. I believe in doing both, if possible, but I acknowledge that they're entirely separate undertakings, if you want them to be.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 05:21 PM
3

If that's what you want, then adopt a child and skip the whole neurotic woman/mother part, entirely.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 05:04 PM
2

I identified as a feminist ally until the radfems (and the radical-leaning plurality of feminists) got greedy, militant and misandristic. I still support limited, commonsense feminist rights (not necessarily the "rights" they would claim, though), but I also support Men's Rights, since they aren't mutually exclusive and don't have to be a zero sum game. I'm a humanist, which necessarily, by its very definition, includes ALL humans. Humans, social constructs notwithstanding, generally all want th…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:41 AM
3

To ignore this thread within reality that some other people do, in fact, operate in a manner that gives preference to attractive or famous people (aka bias) is a mistake. God forbid such people are ever granted power over others, yet they routinely are granted such power. Female privilege and Celebrity Worship are very real things. Ignore them and they will eventually "bite" you, too.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 05:25 PM
4

I tend to pay a bit more attention to the whole "don't be a tyrannical douchebag or all the competent people will make a hasty exit" part. Lots of historical authors were unnecessarily verbose, with exceptionally flowery, hyper-intellectual language. At least she got the "don't be a tyrannical douchebag or all the competent people will make a hasty exit" part right. That's more than most authors can say. Also, it's not unusual for successful people to seek partners that are as successful (or mor…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 03:37 AM
4

You don't think the super capitalist exists? Forbes has a whole list of them. Of course, many of them are socialists and closet communists. Still, a few meet the criteria of both super and capitalist. Example: Elon Musk. You can be both a capitalist and a Libertarian, at the same time.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:33 AM
33

Atlas Shrugged, Marriage & Maternity Edition. John Galt has already exited Stage right.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:31 PM
15

These are also known as Honey Badgers - women who support men's rights. It is a big deal. Love em'! Long live the Honey Badgers. Everyone needs people who advocate for them within their demographic circles.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 03:18 AM
1

The problem with letting morons define the rules (Intersectionalism) of how to play the game, means one has to play the same game as the morons, playing by their rules or be the "first place loser" aka "second place". The one who doesn't participate in the "complaint marathons" and the "Victim Olympics" loses by simple default. While the better game is always to play the one that includes full-fledged morals and ethics, based on "tried and true" time-tested principles which defy improvement, sin…
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:55 AM
1

You give too much credit to the audience. While I agree that we should speak in "plain language", there is a bias against it. It's the "non-intellectual" language of the so-called "flyover states". With a significant, and growing, number of "useful idiots" in the audience, chanting about "intellectualism" and "science", when it's actually psuedo-intellectualism and cherry-picked from competing "versions" of science (aka reductionism), the philosophical battles must be fought on all fronts. Ignor…
/r/MensRights01/08/22 03:37 AM
9

A 22 yr old attractive woman, who "had her whole life in front of her"...
/r/MensRights29/07/22 09:51 PM
1

EVERY woman carries the potential to BE this type of woman. So does every man, carry the potential to be this type of man. Only time and historical behavior can tell the story. Even with a long track record of good historical behavior, the potential still exists. Voila', there's equality.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 03:46 PM
3

Quickest way to figure out how she stands on this issue: Keep your bank account exclusively yours. If necessary, open a "joint" account for all household bills and expenses. Deposit your share of the bills and expenses into the joint account each month. If she goes apeshit about this, you'll know why. Because she expects unfettered access to your money (or "her money" that's in your care and temporary custody). If she doesn't complain, you've got a good one. Same thing with Pre-nups.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:27 AM
8

It may be the first time you heard it...But it's definitely not the first time men have been saying it. You probably couldn't hear it over the incessant din of the non-stop infinite "complaint marathons" and the "Victim Olympics" of the feminist "movement". Maybe you should broaden your horizons and listen better. By the way, your response indicates that you believe sexism and gender inequality exists. Sexism of both varieties (male and female) DO exist and have existed since time began. Funny t…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 05:31 AM
1

I started in Blue Collar, then parlayed that into College. It's a good path to take. Really depends on how ambitious one is, financially-speaking. Women seem to generally only want high-paying White Collar jobs that aren't too messy, dirty, hot, or gross. Or one's that are super-flexible to allow them to do the mommy thing, without too much resistance. Or both (the White Collar jobs usually come with a bunch of flexibility built in).
/r/MensRights25/07/22 12:26 AM
1

Each class increases the cost of the overall degree. For someone with a Masters Degree, you sure don't seem to rEaD GuD.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 12:10 AM
15

It isn't an "increase" in incidents. These things all happened before. But "woman on child violence" wasn't as "big of a deal" before, culturally or socially. It was illegal and socially frowned upon, before the "Zero Tolerance/Letter of the Law" Feminist crowd arose causing an imbalance, through constant claims of female victimhood and constant villainization of men. It's also noteworthy that much "woman on child violence" is "explained away" by biology aka Postpartum Depression. It does exist,…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 12:02 AM
1

You do realize that the colleges do charge money for Women's Studies, which does ultimately get added to the cost of whatever degree was sought? How much of the total aggregate student loan debt is for Women's Studies courses, that generally-speaking are taught by misanthrists and encourage the infinite use of the word misogynist? If it's $1, it's $1 too much. I'm going to guess it's WAY more than $1.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:45 PM
1

All 4 things can be (and most likely are) true, simultaneously: 1.) College is too expensive 2.) More women have student loan debt 3.) Colleges lack diversity (as a plan, not an accident) 4.) Any cancelation of student loan debt will likely benefit women more, since they carry more of the total aggregate student loan debt.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:37 PM
5

Pretty soon, any resistance to Student Loan cancelation will dissipate to almost nothing, since the debt load will be carried mostly by women. Then it'll be men's duty to support/agree with the cancelation of student debt (or be labeled "misogynistic")
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:32 PM
2

Captive audience.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:05 AM
1

They'll never acknowledge it as Toxic Femininity or even reprint/use that label anywhere in MSM, since that would constitute "validation" that it actually does exist (which it does). Misandry is DARVO'ed as it is, even though instances of its usages go back over a hundred years. Toxic Masculinity as a phrase is relatively new. It'll probably take another 100 years for Toxic Femininity to be even "acknowledged" as a thing, but not "validated".
/r/MensRights18/07/22 11:11 PM
-1

Everything comes with some risks #NeverZero. Question is "how much" risk and is the reward worth the (Never Zero) level of risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 09:26 PM
14

Thank god I'm in a male-dominated field. Not for long, because "Mandatory Zero-Tolerance Diversity" requirements and politicization will eventually come for your field, too, unless you're in the NFL or NBA. Agree on everything else, though.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 08:54 PM
2

Serving self-interests through targeted redefinition. Yep.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 04:10 AM
8

So, the interesting thing is that InCel was coined by a woman, to describe herself and a small community of people who were experiencing the same circumstances as her. Then the radfems got a hold of it and turned it into a weaponization version to use as a cudgel to insult men.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 03:40 AM
0

My theories (regarding men who are legitimately seeking a long-term partner): Men will "imprint" on a partner ONLY AFTER the partner, who meets the majority or plurality of the man's individually-variable preferences, gives the "green light" and consent to mutually attempt pair-bonding. Until then, the man's perfect mate is just a nebulous shadow...an unconfirmed theory. Nothing that a man can "imprint" upon. Any "imprinting" prior to consent is known to society as "stalking" with highly negativ…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 10:51 PM
1

I have no control over how you, or anyone, interprets my posts. I don't make "authoritative pronouncements". I post my opinion. If you interpret it any other way, then you ARE a moron. Learn to think better. 🙂 By the way, I'm fully cognizant and accepting of the fact that there are many intelligent people, many smarter than me, in fact. The fact that I disagree with someone doesn't mean I think I'm the smartest person in the universe. If you can't handle some dissension about your opinions, or t…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:57 PM
1

Don't recall what his name is... I'll look it up and add an edit. Alex Stein
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:38 PM
2

Sorry. Forgot to add IMO again. That always seems implied, but apparently not. That's called a "fork" in the conversation. Conversations can change direction. But whatever. Have a good night.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:48 AM
5

That's called revenge, vengefulness, spitefulness or maybe vengeance. Maybe tyranny fits.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:41 AM
3

Maybe not furthering the discussion YOU want to have. Perhaps it's furthering the discussion I want to have. Don't need your permission for that. And it's true...I do have plenty to say. Also, every single comment on reddit is self-indulgent, including yours, so I guess that makes me...normal?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:31 AM
5

I'm reasonable and non-aggressive when the circumstances are deserving of it. In fact, I start every interaction this way. I make no guarantees it will remain that way, if morons make themselves clearly obvious and get passive-aggressive or insulting. I'm not part of the moron class who believes words can be violence and then, in the same breath, say that silence is violence. Which is it? I'm also not part of the moron class who believes "all conflict is bad conflict". There is such a thing as P…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:00 AM
3

Sorry if I didn't tag every statement with IMO. Didn't think I needed to. But then, maybe I should for all the morons who lack critical thinking skills.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:40 AM
4

Nah. I have my opinion. You can post your opinion, too. I know what I know. You don't have to agree. That's how this all works. You can certainly have an opinion, but no one gets to define their opinion as facts. Not you, either, moron. So, whether you think I'm pompous or not is really not relevant or impressive.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:20 AM
2

Hey, what's your Medical License number? I'm leaning towards "you're a fraud who doesn't have one" misrepresenting yourself as some sort of clinician. But, hey, if you do have a license, I'd be happy to contact your Ministry of Health and let them know about all the Healthcare Privacy laws you seem to be ignorant of and/or are abusing, as well as the harassment you're enacting. Bitch, you're the one who keeps coming back for more and poking the bear. I'm happy to service all your stupidity strai…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 03:09 AM
5

Bitch, you just got through whining about how I'm commenting on someone I don't even know. You don't know me, dumbass. You know nothing about me. Don't assume you can "fix" someone you don't even know, long-distance. They do use cunt in the UK, right? Fitting for you. Why don't you have some tea and crumpets and calm your tits, dumbass. 🙂
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:36 AM
8

Be careful. Ironically, you're currently outting yourself as exactly the emotionally and mentally abusive sort of cunt that most of the men in this group have already experienced and already know exists.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:28 AM
5

You're stupid AF, moron. First, petty little morons like you label stoicism as "Toxic Masculinity", apply it to all men monolithically, say we should work on being more like women (immasculation), as if women "have it all together" (they don't) and as though women's approaches to life are "safer and more responsible" like a feminist gynocentric "supremacist". Then you suggest we should "have a cry", and that you feel "put upon". Hint: cry yourself a river, douche-nozzle. I'm not crying for you. …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:46 AM
1

This too will be temporary. Nothing is permanent. Change is inevitable and wordlessly refuses to be denied. Can't be argued with, negotiated with, simply rejected or ignored. Also, it's relevant/pertinent to mention that there's no change, no progress, without prices. Choices and prices reign supreme. There can't be one without the other. They're connected, coexistant, completely intertwined and cannot be separated. Of the "Spooky action at a distance" type connection.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:04 AM
2

You're part of that change if your comments are actually as genuine as they seem. The truth always manages to come to the forefront, if one waits long enough. Hopefully, it'll be in my lifetime, but I doubt it. Things like this are generational and change slowly. But maybe the pace of change is speeding up. I don't know. It's also important to note that these are observations of the extremes. There's a whole demographic of people who do not involve themselves in any of the culture wars that alre…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:54 AM
9

Dunno. Just a rant, is all. The problem is the useful idiots, though. Politicians don't get elected by themselves. For the record, she clearly wanted to sleep with that comedian. /s
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:47 AM
7

Byeee, moron! Have a day! (Or don't, that'd be okay, too)
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:45 AM
43

MOST women are cool. Radfems are NOT cool. The problem is politicians pander to weak-minded, ignorant useful idiots, and tell them that they (the politicians) can make the world "safe", and bring about Utopia, when they literally can't. The universe is what it is. It's gonna do whatever it wants to regardless of any human effort to change the course it's already on. Not the course humans have planned. The course that the universe is already on. Humans can barely effect change to the negative res…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:41 AM
6

Yeah. They wander in here, every so often. It's just part of the society and culture we live in.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:23 AM
10

Hey, douche-nozzle, you're taking an online interaction, on social media, and extrapolating it to be my entire existence, as if this interaction is ALL I am. I have plenty of empathy for deserving women. You ain't one of them. Go fuck yourself, with your shitty takes. I think there are some actual children who need you to condescend to them, but wait... Then you'd be fucking up an entirely new generation and turning them into mini-morons who sounds just like you. Skip it - Don't procreate or int…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:13 AM
4

Nah. Not necessary. I like verbally shitting on liberal douchebags who talk like they're the responsible adult in the room, when they clearly aren't. You sound more like a condescending shit-smear than a responsible adult. I can actually separate my online presence from my real life, unlike douchebag liberals who think the world owes it to them to get to be "authentic" 24x7 whether in the public square or in their private lives, while everyone else makes an actual effort to separate the 2. Moron…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:47 PM
5

Then why did you say that you're "absolutely curious" and "this just popped up in my feed", dumbass. Or did you just conveniently "forget" all that? I didn't. By the way, you're "take"... your shitty assumptions...are exactly why you're a moron, who apparently doesn't know how to conduct a q&a based discussion. Also, I'm not angry at all. I couldn't give 2 shits about your ignorance, beyond how it's a pattern that we all have to live with. You're just another dumbass that the rest of us all have…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:36 PM
17

Man, you're a moron. You asked a question. I responded in general terms. It's amazing how little it actually takes to offend morons. It's cool. Go be clueless in your little echo chamber. Toodles.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:54 PM
12

I literally made zero comments specifically about you, as an individual. But, hey, you do you. 🙂
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:51 PM
24

First, thank you for caring enough to at least ask. +1 Upvote for basic curiosity and initial open-mindedness. Because you don't have the slightest clue how much harder men can have it, in the same sense that men can "never know how painful pregnancy is, for women". Same thing. The protected and insulated rarely ever realize the shitstorm they are protected and insulated from. When things "go right", they're usually transparent and generally overlooked. It's only when things "go wrong" that they…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:16 PM
2

Perceptions of "unfairness" are usually rooted in ignorance, poor understanding, wholesale acceptance of others lies or simple misinformation (without proper Due Dilligence and research for oneself), more... I'm curious in what ways you perceive women to be "mistreated" in new and different ways, recently? All the same forms of mistreatment have existed for millenia. There's no "new" forms of mistreatment. And "mistreatment" is entirely subjective, so...I guess that depends, and is defined by, o…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:01 PM
1

I'm not saying they're right or wrong. Just saying it's a curiosity, since it would represent greater choice for men. Nothing good ever comes from the destruction or prohibition of choice. Men's choice would go from compliance: legal vs illegal to actual choice: Yes, I want or No, I don't want, without excessive government nanny-state intervention.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 05:28 PM
1

I think many men in the US would probably disagree with you, since it's not legal here (except some areas of Nevada).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 09:03 AM
1

Don't need validation from modern US women, if it comes with all the neurotic bs. They can keep the validation and the neurotic bs all to themselves. In fact, don't really need validation from you, either. 🙂
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 08:52 AM
15

Don't quit, brother. You're not alone... not alone in your feelings... reach out to other men. This is important. Being a man, other men will be able to relate to your feelings. I had a period of moderate, and deepening despair. The world was feeling really dark and ominous. The women in my life weren't able to really understand, let alone help...even ones who wanted to. Now, I don't know how you feel about organized religion, but I went to a Men's Retreat, through my church, and it helped me im…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 04:16 AM
1

Assuming it were legal? Men would be able to shit-can all the useless, female-biased dating apps, so their wallets would see an improvement, but then, that and any savings from the avoidance of costs associated with dating, would likely be spent on escorts on Friday night. Bars and nightclubs would probably see some small-to- moderate dip in their attendance numbers and revenue. The biggest change would be the massive diminishment of women's power over their "captive audience"...Men. I'm not sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 12:12 AM
6

Because then they can't be the "oppressed victim" ALL the time. They'd have to advocate, or at least acknowledge the struggles for someone who ISN'T in their demographic group. They have no desire to compare Privileges. They don't acknowledge that they HAVE any privileges. And privilege examination/analysis is the game they started with their super-dumb Intertsectionality bs. They want everyone to play the game EXCEPT themselves, because if they play the privileges game then they lose power.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 08:42 PM
1

Cool. I'll do that. I hope you focus on being less of a moron, cause it's a bad look on anyone, as well. Have a day, moron.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 06:38 PM
1

Your moronic mischaracterized, misattributed, delusional, estrogen-biased point? That one? I guess it would certainly further that point, for you and other morons like you. Unfortunately, I don't really care much about morons moronic points. They're moronic to begin with, stay moronic throughout, and expire in ever greater levels of moronic than they began with. Be calm and stay moronic! Attempting to talk a moron out of their moronic points is essentially a useless non-starter since morons jeal…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 06:27 PM
1

Yep. You've gone full moron. Have a day. I don't really care if it's a good one or not. Have another moronic day, I guess, since that's all you're seemingly capable of.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 05:53 PM
1

Don't be a moron. You don't have to be, but it seems you may be heading down that road. 🙂
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:04 PM
1

I'm not your "my dude". Let's start with that.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:07 AM
1

Okay. You start. You go first. Your condescension began a while ago. It's funny that you think your dating advice can fix anything to do with men's issues. Somehow your simple advice is going to fix it all, despite huge systemic social issues, like it's "my" problem, not the social environment. Pretty arrogant and condescending if you ask me. Are you going to fix the all the pair-bonding struggles men face with some simple "dating advice"? You don't even have the personal self-awareness to know …
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:55 AM
0

Uh-huh. Take more math classes. It'll do you good. 👍
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:36 AM
0

Ummm...I clearly stated it as a distribution, not a monolith. When a person clarifies "some, but not all" they are no longer generalizing about an entire class. I'd be happy to give you some math and statistics lessons, if you'd like.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:48 AM
2

Also, it's not subjective if it's happening in "real time". Does a tree still fall in the woods, even if you weren't there to witness it? I have multiple experiences with multiple women, who've acted how I've described. That's pretty damn "objective" if you ask me.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:37 AM
2

You should try being a single male, attempting to date in the current modern era risk- intolerant hyper-safetyist society. Just saying "go find a non-slacker" makes that plainly obvious.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:32 AM
1

If you watched series "Mad Men" AND liked it, without thinking it was "Sexist!" you're probably more Traditional. After all, it was a portrayal of life in the 50's. If you watch anything with a Khardashian in it, and think it's awesome, then you're probably more Modern.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:29 AM
3

Doesn't matter what you or I think...Objective reality is objective reality. Many women, not all, but many are becoming slackers who think the man should do anything hot, dirty, messy, uncomfortable or generally "gross". These are not "Women's work", but if there's any suggestion about what qualifies as "Women's work", the utterer WILL be labeled Sexist to shut them down and shut them up. The world has a LOT of things in these categories, which still must be done, and men are still expected to d…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:24 AM
3

Ummm... Maybe you're "the Exception, not the Rule" in your peer group. Depends on whether you identify as "Traditional", "Modern" or (most likely) some mix of the two. In some aspects, I'm quite traditional. In other aspects, I'm quite modern. Most modern women seem to think they get to be freed from the kitchen, the stereotypes and the traditional female challenges, but don't seem to think men deserve the same freedom from their male challenges. In fact, most modern women seem to think men DON'…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:04 AM
1

This...This right here...Nailed it. Props!
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:53 AM
7

Yet another example of "Process is punishment", where the true victim is a male and the true perpetrator is a woman. Her statistically inaccurate "fears", in conjunction with her seeming penchant for weaving bs stories, created a whole sh1tstorm for everyone else to "sort out". At least, I'm glad to see that she's not being given a complete pass on the whole taxpayer-funded sh1tstorm that she invented out of thin air. Maybe she'll think twice about spewing bs next time.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 08:08 PM
2

Why the hell do I care what some moron in Montreal did, in reaction to changes in US law that don't even affect him directly? By the way, men DO have and DO use contraceptives. They're called condoms and while they do have a failure rate, it's like 5 - 10% if my memory serves correctly. Of course, it's like the lottery... You can't win if you don't play. If they aren't used, their failure rate jumps to 100%. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. This boils down to human failures in choices, as a…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:24 AM
19

To be fair, the nose job won't make her any less ugly on the inside.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:44 AM
41

I think thename you're looking for is "Stockholm Syndrome." Women's abusiveness is essentially a leaky faucet that "drip, drip, drips" which builds up behind the man's stoicist "dam", eventually causing a loud, destructive failure where the man is the "cause" and the woman is the "victim", but no attention is ever paid to the "drip, drip, drips" of the woman's abuse. This evil, destructive cycle plays itself out over and over again and no one ever questions or doubts the woman's actions in the o…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:48 PM
3

Also well said. Men are just as worthy and deserving of being set free from the stereotypes and the barriers/ties that affect them. I think we all deserve this: No stereotypes. No artifical barriers, especially not ones based on gender as the sole consideration. True humanitarianism doesn't mean stepping over the bodies of the conquered, while one seeks to improve the lot of a partial segment of society. True humanitarianism means as one achieves successes, they reach back and pull someone else …
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:53 AM
5

I'm certainly not interested in a romantic relationship where I have to genuflect and prone myself/bend the knee to a woman. I don't completely write off a potential relationship, but it would have to be based on something not likely to be found in the current day and age: actual equality. I believe the phrase goes, "Happy wife, happy life"...Nah, not for me. No wife, happy life. (Until I find a sane, non-neurotic partner... I'm not holding out much hope, though)
/r/MensRights11/07/22 10:45 PM
27

If the roles were reversed, the man would be feeling regret...as they closed the prison door behind him. Orders of magnitude higher levels of regret, I imagine. Who cares if she felt regret while going about her normal day, the following day, while drinking her overpriced latte...Let's see how much regret she feels behind the prison door. I mean equality and equity, right? Equal outcomes and all...
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:27 AM
7

Gratefully, I don't live in Canada. I would prefer no lists be made that have no Due Process or ability to get oneself removed from said list, but "When in Rome, do as the Romans do".
/r/MensRights11/07/22 12:55 AM
25

Anybody want to start a list of problematic, misbehaving women? If it's good for the goose, it must be good for the gander.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 10:17 PM
7

It's hilarious when biased douche-nuggets claim "singularity" or "plurality" of victimhood. Your ignorance of the law and, by proxy, reality, is obvious. It shows and you embarrass yourself publicly by doing so. But you probably thoroughly enjoy your ignorance, since curing it requires work, a sense of responsibility, and a personal commitment to accountability. You seem to be suffering a shortage of all these.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 11:51 PM
11

They already have that. It's called the judicial system. We spend a crap ton of money on it already. This gets played out in the "court of public opinion" because people don't like the outcomes from the court, based on actually law, not what people think the law oughta' be or their ignorance/misunderstanding of the law. They also have therapists, who will never suggest anything other than their perceived victim status. We pay a crap-ton in taxes for that, too.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 09:51 PM
33

If we're going to play the bs Intersectionalism game, that we're all being unwillingly dragged into(by dopey liberals and ignorant younger generations), then she got away with because she is white AND because she is a woman. Don't start back-pedaling now. You don't get to play it both ways and start minimizing and separating, after the fact. 🙂
/r/MensRights09/07/22 09:43 PM
37

Draft equally or no forced draft at all. Both of these solutions advance "equality" and "equity". "Selective preference" is just as bad as "Selective exclusion/segregation".
/r/MensRights08/07/22 09:03 PM
1

Grass is always greener on the other side of the fence. If you'd have been laid off, during the pandemic, you'd be wishing for what you already have, now.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:08 AM
-5

Equal number of Humans, regardless of gender. Crap... That doesn't even work. Maybe we should go back to how kids express themselves: equal numbers of "innies" and "outies"... but let's not forget the intersex folks. (But they have both, so we're still "inclusive").
/r/MensRights07/07/22 12:56 AM
1

Spoken through the lens of women being perfectly righteous in their approaches to risk and sacrifice, as in "this is the way" and completely ignoring, minimizing or "cancelling" men's struggles, challenges and imperfection. I'm gonna call bs on this "Women are perfectly perfect, and men are perfectly imperfect and "wrong-headed"." Men are generally aware of their own risks, as males, and ACCEPT those risks, knowing that negative results and negative outcomes MAY/MAY NOT occur for any endeavor. T…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:53 PM
5

Perhaps the fatherlessness part IS the TRIGGER...the beginning/source for all the other "compound effects". May not be "causal", but seems "highly correlated" to me.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:33 AM
19

Similar rising awareness in South Korea and India.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 12:21 AM
4

As long as they don't employ therapists who approach therapy from a biased, female supremacist perspective that includes "anger is bad", "all conflict is bad" or "men should be more like women". Neither genders behaviors or mannerisms are entirely right or entirely wrong. Therapists need to advocate and treat accordingly.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 08:34 PM
2

Hard to fault an entire country for having a simple majority of morons. In the US, we have our own simple majority of morons, too. Apparently, sheeple and morons are present everywhere. Here, in the US, we know them as Leftists, Socialists and, to some degree (though not all) Democrats writ large.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 12:56 AM
2

SJW's make terrible humans. Period. Full stop.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 01:20 AM
2

However, trying to get the house "right" might be the trigger that starts the homicidal rampage. Wait... the trigger might be whether the island is "suitable" enough. Or perhaps (re)naming said island. Based on the CHOP Zone, I think a week might be a little "generous".
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:24 PM
2

True. Happy Cake Day!
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:20 PM
4

If it's on an island in the middle of the ocean, I say let em' do it. Give em' one of the smaller islands in the Hawaian Islands. Get woke, go broke! How quick before they went all "Lord of the Flies" female/XX edition? I notice they're not making a SJW/Woke remake of that movie... Probably cause' men see SJW women doing it every day, already. Just don't give em' any nukes, since they're almost as neurotic as extremist theology-based middle-easterners.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:50 PM
13

Process is punishment. Frequently, more often punishment for men than for women although it does affect everyone. While men may tend more towards physical competition/conflict, women seem to trend more towards Law-fare (basically, non-physical competition/conflict with a judge and lawyers involved...but it's still competition and it's still conflict).
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:39 PM
34

Not really. You should read the link another redditor posted. Something like a 300% increase, over 14 years, in male celibacy. A "sex strike" is like denying someone salt in the middle of a desert. Salt, while useful, even necessary for life, is dehydrating and someone in the middle of a desert has much bigger, more immediate problems to worry about. It will eventually fail after enough people grow bored with it or discover that they have a libido, too. It seems much more successful (but even th…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:45 AM
5

Facts!
/r/MensRights28/06/22 04:44 AM
45

With modern women, how is this different from any prior random day of the week ending with "y". They've also been using sex as a weapon since the beginning of time itself (or at least tried).
/r/MensRights28/06/22 04:42 AM
2

My response: It depends. It depends on other factors like men's level of reproductive rights within the overall framework of overall Reproductive Rights (both parents), what level of government is given oversight over Reproductive Rights (this will never be a one-size-fits-all solution, and that's the only kind the Federal Government seems to offer. No tolerances for different people, who live in different areas, face different risks and challenges, as well as getting taxed "all the same" regard…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 12:52 AM
1

There are so many things that can go wrong and no one should be forced to go through them. Numero uno: Welcome to life, where risk is abundant, persistent and can't be eliminated. Only diminished or transferred to someone else. Numero dos: I agree. No one should be FORCED to carry a pregnancy or pay for one unwillingly. Women or Men. Unless you're pregnant now, you're arguing for for the self-interest of yourself and those "like you"... your interest group. Just not ALL that are like you...as in…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:09 PM
1

If a women chooses to have the child by herself, without the fathers consent, she's assuming the risks of pregnancy ALL BY HERSELF, and forcing the father to accept those risks whether he likes it or not. Cramming down risk into his life that he doesn't consent to. You can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:59 PM
1

I've never said the risk are identical. I said the risk are NO MORE OR LESS IMPORTANT, bonehead. In that respect, YOU don't get to determine that a particular risk is greater or lesser, in a collective manner, for anyone but yourself. And it is just as risky and life-affecting for men. The risks may be DIFFERENT, but they aren't quantitatively or qualitatively any less worthy of your time and consideration. For you to diminish, downgrade and denigrate men's risks, in this calculus, tells me EXAC…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:48 PM
1

By the way, millions of women give birth every year without experiencing "damage, ripping out from vagina to anus, lot’s of diseases, it can make teeth fall out all the way to death". Nice way to "pick the mouse-turds out of the pepper shaker."
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:30 AM
1

By the way, how much is "enough" and who decides that? You? The judge? Does the kid need the latest $250 celebrity "kicks" or will the $30 pair of shoes be sufficient? Oh and by the way, courts don't generally "check in" on how the mother is spending the "child support" money. She could use that to fund a $1K per month coke habit and no one will be the wiser unless the father complains to the court.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:23 AM
1

Men CAN and DO take women to court to attempt to preserve the life of the unborn child, when the father wants it, but the mother doesn't. A court order is a court order. The men often fail, but they do try. However, that just speaks to the courts being gynocentric and kindercentric and giving greater consideration to the mother (and child) than the father.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:16 AM
1

(most abortions are carried out under week 12) Cool. Then the 15 week requirement shouldn't be a problem, then. So stop acting like you act in the interest of women by ruling out abortions. Who said I was acting in the interest of women? I'm not. I'm acting in the interests of human beings, with an emphasis on men. I happen to be one and, thusly, care about men's issues. Abortion is a men's issue as much as it is a woman's issue. To suggest anything else would be moronic. Women do a lot of stupi…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:12 AM
1

And you don't think "being forced to pay money", on the order of 30-50% isn't "life altering"? Money can't be totally indispensable for one person and completely dispensible for someone else. That's called "inequality", "hypocrisy" and preferential treatment. My money doesn't lose any value or importance to me just because I'm a man. A woman's money isn't more "critical" or more valuable just because she's a woman and/or a mother. As a matter of responsibility and accountability, a woman should …
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:03 AM
1

Having a simple discussion could avoid all the judicial law-fare. Maybe the mother might actually be willing, in this scenario, to carry the baby to term, for the father, assuming there's appropriate financial support during the pregnancy and a commitment by the father to carry, solely, all post-birth financial responsibilities. This doesn't have to be a Federal case. Leave it to the actual parents to attempt to work it out. If it becomes combative, then let the courts decide. Hint: this is alre…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:49 AM
1

One could result in permanent damage, ripping out from vagina to anus, lot’s of diseases, it can make teeth fall out all the way to death You know what else can cause infections, extreme blood loss, inadvertent sterilization, and death? Abortions can do all those and more... Planned Parenthood probably only whispers those parts, since they're required to tell it, but they probably say these outcomes are "rare" like abortions were supposed to be. Yes, the side effects of abortion can be up to dea…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:37 AM
1

and the other is just paying forced to give up money Ummm...iT's jUsT mOnEy...If that's the case, then why do women need it. It's just money. If the absence of money can be so "perilous" for a single mother or a child, why isn't it just as "perilous" for a man. You don't think real-world harm can come from financial ruin? Courts don't give a crap if a man's financial status changes - loss of employment, layoffs, theft, economic downturns, inflation, increases in gas prices. And life is nothing i…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:30 AM
1

You obviously don't ReAd Gud! Read the rest of the posts in the thread and get back to me. 👍
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:15 AM
2

Well, the world is changing. More people are "using their voices" to speak up. Society is changing, from the electorate up and the top down. Culture is changing. As one side makes strides, the other side wants strides to be made, as well. Roe v. Wade isn't a big R "God-given" Right. It's the batshit crazy idea of Big Gov, Tax and Spend, liberal douchebags who think, due to their simple existence, that the universe owes them a living. There was a time, a brief time, where Roe v Wade served a high…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:18 AM
1

In the absence of clear, authentic attempts at cooperation, then being fully and completely uncompromising with an equally uncompromising competitor is the only option left, since it will, at least, preserve the status quo, and prevent further destruction, through maintaining the ongoing tug-of-war, in perpetuity.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:57 AM
1

No. It doesn't. It simply give the sqeakiest wheel the grease. However, if both sides arrive at the negotiating table seeking an actual solution, with all members of their respective groups in alignment with the rest of their group, and an authentic intention to negotiate a fair solution for both parties, then comprise can be reached even without complete consensus. There's a name for this: compromise. Compromise isn't a "bad" word. It simply means that you have the minimum level of respect for …
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:41 AM
1

While I can appreciate your willingness, it needs to be more than just you. Liberal morons actually attempted to assassinate a sitting SCOTUS Justice. Not for "completely prohibiting abortion", but for returning the decision to the states, where such decisions actually belong (as the Founders actually intended). And morons, like the Center-Left Christian, from Canada (above), who thinks they get a vote in US Public Policy and thinks killing zygotes is "a-ok". Ummm...No, on both accounts. And hyp…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:47 AM
1

There can't be any compromise if either party fails to compromise. No flexibility = no compromise.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 10:52 PM
2

Exactly. No ability to "opt out" and women have the backing of the full force of the US Justice system, which can mete out harsh penalties for a father's non-compliance. There should be harsh penalties for mothers who are non-compliant with court DECISIONS. Not a "one-size-fits-all" attempt at public order. Hence why, liberal morons and the far rights should really soften their rhetoric.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 10:31 PM
1

Do you really want to give men the right to decide whether a woman has to continue the pregnancy or not? Wouldn’t that be unfair towards women. Do you mean equally as unfair as forcing a man to keep a child he doesn't want? Uh-huh. Cry me a river. The reality of the matter is, there's no "one-size-fits-all" solution to this matter... No easy solution to it. The reality is we'll probably have to do both, not "one or the other"... Allow for both to "opt in" and, simultaneously, allow both to "opt …
/r/MensRights23/06/22 09:54 PM
2

Someone's ALWAYS going to feel like they got steamrolled, since complete consensus is nearly impossible to reach. Everyone has a different opinion and no one's opinion is ever completely "righteous", since it never represents everyone... just them, and their interest groups. I use to be pro-choice and 2 things happened: Society changed and the privilege was abused. I'll likely never agree with Pro-Choicer's ever again.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 08:50 PM
1

The woman, in conjunction with the government, the courts and the medical industry, already HAS the say whether the kid will see its first birthday. Men do not, without costly, protracted extraordinary measures (lawyers, lawsuits, etc). Even with a legal order to continue the pregnancy, a woman can "accidentally fall down the stairs" or simply choose to defy the court and take their chances. The man has no decisions about the future of the child, once the child exists.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:48 PM
2

Yes, that's true...the part about life not being fair. This is about equality of choice, equality of responsibility and equality of accountability. A woman should have no claim over a man's wallet, if her choices aren't in alignment with his wishes. Making a choice to be a single parent is a BIG, grown-ass woman level choice. The choice of an adult. But then, they say "I can't do it alone". Well, if you can't do it alone, maybe you should make a different choice, in the name of responsibility an…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:36 PM
3

You either accept risks WITH your partner or don't expect them to. It's really that simple. If women want to refuse any risks, selectively, men should have that same right, too. 🙂
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:29 PM
0

Not wrong, just lacked the clarity of properly stating/fully addressing the nuances. Didn't go all the way to the bottom of the rabbit hole.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:56 AM
5

I think you can relatively safely call that entire liberal concept a "Social Construct", not a scientific fact. Liberal nut bags love to quote science, when even scientists are saying, "WTF". They only like the science that fits their narrative and seem to despise the entire Scientific Method, unless it backs their ideology. That's not how the Scientific Method works. Follow the results wherever they may lead...Not, start with a desired outcome and force the result to fit the narrative.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:44 AM
0

Technically, I didn't say it to a child, I said it to Redditors on Reddit, but okay... So, true enough... Still, a child doesn't live in a vacuum. They have parents who notice when shit's wrong with their kids. They have friends. They have teachers. They have doctors. While it would be silly to say that "no one slips through the cracks", it's even more moronic to believe that "no one is going to notice". Your hypothetical is far more likely to be the exception, not the rule. I don't buy it, but …
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:26 AM
3

The biggest hurdle in the US is government policy, prerequisites and requirements. The same reason that charitable organizations won't take a pricey piece of furniture that has a rip or a stain... or why pet adoption is highly selective. Because the conditions aren't "perfect". Perfect is the enemy of good enough. There are plenty of "would-be" adoptive parents who can't adopt, simply because they don't "meet the minimum criteria", due to not being "perfect". Dumbest thought process ever, to den…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:02 AM
0

TL;DR your book. Hahahahaha...A Center-Left Christian who supports abortion. Not even a smart one, at that...Why do you even bother affiliating with an organization whose policy is pretty clearly pro-life/anti-abortion? By the way, this is American public policy, so piss off. Go fix all your Canadian bs. I understand that there's a wealth of it. Thanks, byeeeeee. By the way, are you referring to US Conservaturds or Canadian Conservaturds, in your border-defying globalist aspirations to twist the…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 04:38 AM
3

Ummm... Life's random and full of risks, from beginning to end. There aren't any guarantees. So, she gets rid of the risks of pregnancy, but could still get hit by a bus a few days later. By the way, abortion comes with health risks: inadvertent sterilization, bleeding/ blood loss, infection, death... So, what's your point, exactly? That life's full of risks and women shouldn't have to face all of them... like preferential treatment or something?
/r/MensRights23/06/22 04:32 AM
1

Scientifically, they're a zygote and a future human, not a parasite, unless you're a moron liberal. Also, each state will have its own policy. Abortion isn't going away. You would still have your choice of state to kill your "parasite", but it may require a little travel. If you're a moron liberal, you can move to one, like California, preemptively. Get there BEFORE you get pregnant and you can take a quick jaunt down to the local neighborhood Planned Parenthood. It’s both parents child, why sho…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 04:19 AM
9

a man cannot carry a pregnancy nor take on the physical toll or risks of pregnancy. Are you suggesting that there are no Financial risks, associated with pregnancy? Men carry that risk all day, every day and twice on Sunday, if they're not destitute or morally incompetent.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 04:11 AM
17

LagerHead I agree. One of two conditions should exist: Either the man needs to have an affirmative say in whether the child is born or not...OR he should have the right to Financial Abortion if the mother wants the child, but he does not.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 04:03 AM
3

True, but I have no control over what happens in other countries. I only have a say (no matter how miniscule) in what happens here in the US. Other countries have their own processes on how to determine their own laws. FGM, for the most part, doesn't happen here, because...ITS A LAW. There are laws against it in the US.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 03:58 AM
4

Wow. "Technically a parasite". You know, I realize that we live in a secular society, but I wouldn't trust you with my dog. First, Financial abortion isn't even a law, yet. Second, if men have no say in whether the child is gestated/born, he shouldn't be on the hook if he doesn't want a child. Women don't get to play both sides of the fence and have their cake & eat it too.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 03:54 AM
8

the fetus doesn’t have a consciousness Uh-huh. Prove it. I'll wait. Also, it's statistically 50% likely that it will develop into a female. Actually, all zygotes start out as female. The Y chromosome doesn't kick into gear until like 6 weeks in. Where's her Rights?
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:31 AM
11

Disagree. No one has any "bodily autonomy". That's just the feminist rant/rhetoric to justify why men shouldn't get any rights...Rights NO ONE actually has. Bodily Autonomy is like " Sightings of Bigfoot"...People claim to have seen one, but can't ever provide actual proof. And mountains of evidence exists to disprove the false concept of Bodily Autonomy...male or female. They say that men have a Right that we DON'T actually have, as a way of creating a "disparity": Men have it, but women don't.…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:26 AM
27

"Consent to sex is NOT consent to pregnancy! Oh, but only for women. Not sure which side you're coming down on, with this response. All I can say is, science has a name for a fertilized egg. It's called a Zygote. No semen present? No zygote. No zygote, no baby. Zygote = ½ semen, ½ egg. Half that zygote is male biological material. The other half is female biological material. XX + XY = zygote. This is an objective fact. The gestational period is a direct result of pregnancy/creation of a zygote.…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:20 AM
45

i can only explain one equal right they don't like. Ummm... Reproductive rights don't count? Men don't have any of that. Women hold all the cards on that one.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 01:17 AM
7

This is saddening and infuriating at the same time. Reductionism and oversimplification makes "1 in 12" sound like a "nothing burger", and it's a simple weaponization of math and statistics. It's like saying 1 in 7 Americans are black (13-14%, depending on what source you're data comes from). 1:7 sounds pretty miniscule and diminutive, right? This is abuse of perspective, since most people will never "do the math" in their heads. While 1:7 IS "technically" accurate (approximately), it gives no s…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 12:55 AM
75

I wonder if the 2 murderesses were ever charged. Probably not. So saddening and so infuriating. Simultaneously.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 12:38 AM
1

I'd take it one step further and ask the question: Who decides what constitutes "hate"? There are many levels and alternatives before it achieves the minimum threshold to qualify as "hate". Frustration, Resistance, Simple nonviolent anger, Resentment, Disgust, Distrust, Disbelief, More... Many of these are perfectly righteous when one is treated unfairly, unjustly...disrespected, etc This oversimplification... These snap judgements, straight to everything being "hate", lacks nuance and is the so…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 05:33 PM
4

The Leftie Liberal competition for Protesting spaces, attempting to "shoulder out" the competition within their shitty "coalition". This is why lefties always cannibalize their own interests, cancel their own nut-bags and inevitably implode. Hate to see them go. /s Don't let the door hit you in the arse on the way out. Ok, Byeeeee.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:38 AM
10

If you want to keep a transphobic post up be my guest, but don't act like it's not transphobic. Morons be moron'ing, again, tryna' shut down any legitimate discussion or debate, through poorly manufactured, snowflake-level oversensitive, outrage. If you don't want to be part of the discussion or part of the solution, then piss off, whiner. Some people are actually trying to understand the nature of the issue and what can possibly be done to increase understanding and cooperation. If that's not y…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:06 AM
1

Nah...Liberals prefer Kangaroo courts and the Court of Public Opinion, since they can't win their case in an actual civilized, responsible judicial court. "Fire up the base" through "provocative appeals to emotion" to get people to "mostly peacefully protest" with molotov cocktails, bricks, frozen water bottles and milkshakes? Nah... Screw this Liberal douche. Isn't that the "Utopia" that Liberals want to drag everyone into?
/r/MensRights20/06/22 12:21 AM
1

Smells like Domestic Violence, to me... If the roles were reversed, it definitely would be... Is it a "Hate Crime"? Maybe? Guess that depends on the skin color or sexual preferences of her partner... If we don't know what a woman or a man is, then what is a husband or a wife?
/r/MensRights20/06/22 12:12 AM
6

Wow. Big news. Women kill their perceived enemies. And women routinely destroy reputations of their perceived enemies (which may almost be even more malicious, since the victim is still alive to feel the all the increased suffering and increased misery). Nothing new to see, here. Old, but still troubling, news.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 05:34 PM
7

Just reply that you're creating a "safe space" for fragile, risk-intolerant misandrists. /s Or, perhaps, maybe not, if you like your job and prefer to avoid spontaneous visits from HR personnel.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 03:27 AM
7

But "strong men" are all full of that "toxic masculinity". Still a "loss"...Not what I would call a "win". Stop caring excessively what other people think. That's how men "win". Just be careful navigating the proverbial minefield that everyday life has become.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:17 AM
4

When it affects them: "Don't turn us into a monolithic block!" When blaming men: "All men are..." usually followed by "trash", "rapists", or "misogynists"... Wait...I thought we weren't turning groups of people into monolithic blocks? Falls in the category of: Rules for thee, but not for me. Also, what is a woman? Can't make them a monolithic block if they can't even be defined.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:12 AM
1

https://stanfordmag.org/contents/planet-friendly-periods “Our wasteful habits around our periods are intricately tied to misogynistic narratives around the female body and its functions,” explains Miranda Strominger, a master’s student in sociology and former employee at Ruby Cup, a Berlin-based social enterprise that sells menstrual cups and donates them to women in Kenya who are unable to afford sanitary products." Blamed again. Let’s revisit the environmental impact of tampons and pads. In th…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 03:59 AM
1

Ummm... Don't be at home, then? Maybe, while you're out, you could earn some additional $$$ for the family? I think they call this a "job", but I'm just spitballing here...
/r/MensRights13/06/22 01:06 AM
4

What is a woman?
/r/MensRights13/06/22 01:02 AM
2

Women are the largest consumers, creating more pollution/waste...I'll have to see if I can find the reference again...Anyway, the garment industry is the largest consumer of fresh water, for production of their garments. Avocados, for all the douchey Liberal commie-fornians, are the single largest consumer of fresh water for the crops to be grown. And, if pair-bonding is no longer a desirable thing, then all cosmetics are useless, non-productive pollution, for no better reason than selfishness (…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 12:41 AM
12

Is this a documentary or something? Edit: Disregard. Just saw the additional pages.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:28 AM
-3

Body Autonomy is an illusion, at any age, or any gender. Case-in-Point: Jack Kevorkian, arrested in 1997, for helping terminal patients die with dignity, on their own terms. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Kevorkian
/r/MensRights05/06/22 01:51 AM
2

These women are WAY more powerful and profound humans than any moronic feminists, radical or otherwise.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:41 PM
1

OP is perfectly within the confines of reasonable expectations. Not the assh0le, IMO. With RadFems, it's always 50/50%, unless it 1.) doesn't benefit a woman or it 2.) increases a burden on a woman. Or if 3.) the woman makes more, to begin with. While I wouldn't expect her to "Pay off" your student loans, regular payments of your monthly student loan obligations are part of the standard monthly operating costs of the family and, as such, are definitely a fair expectation. Then take the money you…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 06:50 PM
1

I get it. All I'm saying is that even egalitarianism can be a negative thing, if taken to an extreme and made "mandatory" or "expected". Egalitarianism is a "prima facia" moral good. But there must be tolerance and moderation, in synchronous parallel, even in egalitarianism, or it may become tyrannical and an immoral form of control of others. Each person must have the choice to "opt in" or "opt out" from egalitarianism and decide what degree of it they want to adhere to or it becomes "undesirab…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:37 AM
1

Hyper-Egalitarianism, forced on someone who is an unwilling participant, is just as tyrannical as "Toxic Masculinity" and "Toxic Femininity", if such things truly do exist. Anything can be taken to an unwelcome extreme. Your Utopia and my Utopia probably look entirely different from each other. You attempt to build your Utopia in a manner that doesn't screw up my Utopia...I'll do the same...mmm-kay?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 04:56 AM
1

There was also a gay male who saved the Allied nations, in WWII, and millions of their respective soldiers, through the advancement of computers and decryption: Alan Turing Also, the CAPTCHA feature is based on his work to identify if AI is actually "sentient" and how to tell the difference between a computer and a human. The Gas Mask was developed by a black man. People in the US use Arabic Numbers/Notation, not Roman Numerals. There's no shortage of contributions to society from any group with…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:35 PM
1

Apparently, the "Mother of Computer algorithms", not the mother of computer coding. The term "bug", as in a software bug, was also coined by a woman... I'll have to refresh my memory what her name was, but computers, as with everything else in our society, are jointly developed by men and women, of every race, color, and creed, through varying means and varying levels of direct/indirect effort. Still, let's not listen to idiots and morons who want to rewrite history to fit their own selfish agen…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:20 PM
2

STFU misinformation/disinformation spreader: http://factmyth.com/factoids/ada-lovelace-wrote-the-first-computer-program/ Attempting to rewrite history, shit-smear? Meet Charles Babbage, the "Father of the computer".
/r/MensRights29/05/22 12:02 AM
2

RadFem "Persecution Complex" on public display...How NOT new...
/r/MensRights28/05/22 06:23 PM
3

Just like all banks and "the house" in Las Vegas. They never lose.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 06:46 PM
3

There's nothing wrong with my intellect. However, my level of civility with morons may certainly be in question. Buckaroo? What are you, 80, with one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel? Gee willikers, commie dumbass...
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:21 AM
0

Just because you're too much of a moron to "clue in" to your own obvious bias doesn't mean the rest of us haven't already caught on. What's your "unconscious bias", dumbass?
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:11 AM
1

Good question... Why are you defending dorks (aka Radical Feminists) with your really soft, rosy presentation of the less shitty, garden-variety feminists? Wear rose-colored glasses much?
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:53 AM
4

You sound like an apologist for the small (proportionally) segment of feminists who aren't, in fact, neurotic crazy people, who aren't actually affiliated with the Rainbow Hair Dye Mafia.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:31 AM
32

Before he was drugged, she and her ex-boyfriend allegedly lured him to a seedy room, according to court filings cited by the New York Daily News. Sounds like planning to me. Planning a theft from an unconscious victim, with another party/perpetrator "lying in wait". Also, any death during the commission of another crime is still homicide/murder... Too bad that her crime went "sideways". She, and her ex, are still responsible for anything that happens during their illicit behavior/act. "I didn't …
/r/MensRights15/05/22 07:36 PM
18

Agreed. The whinners, in the not-so-distant future, when the men and boys show a little more leg, after the catcall: "Wow! I saw that playing out very differently in my head. These definitely aren't the results I expected! Back to the drawing board." This dumb experiment is definitely gonna backfire on them.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 05:20 PM
5

I can certainly understand why he'd be furious and righteously so...
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:30 PM
3

The "Russian Roulette" of pair-bonding in the current epoch. Impossible to eliminate the "want", as a male, but not willing to deal with the "never zero", often "infinitely more than zero" fundamental neuroticism of the modern female. They can keep their crazy all to themselves. They usually only dump out the full version of their "crazy" on intimate partners and hide the crazy during standard work hours. The crazy still leaks out a little during professional work hours, but at least they use to…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 01:02 PM
17

Wait...I thought shaming your partner, or anyone for that matter, is bad, right? Apparently only applies to men who shame women...
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:41 AM
2

It's a socially constructed/legislatively-designed illusion for any human being to erroneously believe, in this modern day, that they actually have "autonomy" over their bodies... That's actually pretty laughable. I think the phrase repeated over and over, in courts all across the land, goes something like, "danger to yourself or others". Gillibrand, and her liberal d-bag cohorts, probably actually believe in the Easter bunny, too.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 11:45 PM
11

Let's not mince words, here...Patriarchy is a political tool invented by feminists to use as a cudgel to beat men and boys about the proverbial head and kneck to demoralize them into complete passivity, silence and compliance, so feminists may justify their place, once and for all, on the top of the societal hierarchy.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 06:39 PM
1

Welcome to reality.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 06:25 PM
3

Well stated, OP! Kudos.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 05:40 PM
5

Your on Reddit. There are multiple Redditors. Learn to discern between an OP and someone replying to a thread.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:57 AM
5

Man, you ARE a moron. Read better, dumbass. That was OP, not me...
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:55 AM
7

I didn't make that claim, dumbass. Nor would I support it, either. If you're not going to read, why would I bother "proving" anything to you, sea-lioning moron.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:29 AM
6

I wouldn't ever suggest that. I think that's dumb, too. People should be able to negotiate their wages as individuals, not as a class or group. Nobody gives a crap when the benefit goes to themselves. They only give a crap when they think someone else is getting more than they are, whether it's perfectly fair or not. I'm perfectly capable of negotiating my salary. It's really not my problem that other people lack the confidence or the capability.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:27 AM
9

My radical claim... that's rich...🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:08 AM
10

If it's viewed as a percentage of time, over a lifetime, I'm reasonably certain that the aggregated time, across the entire society, would be WAYYY more time in dangerous jobs for men. Do you consider construction to be dangerous? Or is absolutely disproportionally performed by men.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:56 AM
11

I couldn't really care less, since the entire "gender wage gap" rhetoric is all bs anyway, so... It's been disproven/ debunked by multiple PhD's, including a female Ivy League PhD Economist...So, the jokes apparently on you.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:51 AM
4

Nailed it.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:45 AM
5

Incel was actually coined by a woman to describe herself and the community she created for fellow Involuntary Celibates. It was RadFem douche-nuggets who twisted the meaning to men alone. You can just use InCel to describe female involuntary celibates or you can use FemCel.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:43 AM
19

You assume that the majority of men didn't put in some time in a "risky" job...Your take seems like it's just a "snapshot in time". I work in a "safer" cubicle farm now, but it wasn't always so. I worked in more than one dangerous job at multiple separate times in my life, totaling over a decade of my life. While adding 10% is also silly, your static "snapshot" take is dumb in that it doesn't account for time or history. Additionally, your static snapshot take is also dumb because your assumptio…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:35 AM
0

Screw em' if they can't take a joke. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:12 AM
1

He's referring to the fact that his wife has opted to care for their child, delaying, rather than pursuing, her childhood dreams, ideal career path and/or any other facets of her own self-interest (assuming motherhood wasn't her childhood dream, which it might have been). Your interpretation is a really selfish/self-serving interpretation... Apparently, you were on the lookout for something to be offended about and he gave you an "in". Pretty crappy interpretation of yours. Fortunately, not ever…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 02:08 AM
11

All he's saying is, "Let's not nominate single mothers for sainthood just yet". Yes, single-motherhood (and single- fatherhood, for that matter) is definitely difficult, but elevating them to "hero status" is ridiculous. Life is hard. No one gets a pain-free pass through life. Not men. Not women. NO ONE. Do you need a pat on the back for taking care of your child, that you chose every step of the way? Which you get huge taxpayer-funded subsidies/exemptions and social/community assistance for? He…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:36 AM
0

I don't feel compelled to prove anything to you, ya' sea-lioning, moron. Do your own research, dumbass. Byyyeeee.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 11:27 PM
0

Cool. You do you, moron. I thought you were leaving already. Don't let me stop you.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 08:28 PM
1

Byyyeeeee...Have fun being brainwashed with "facts" that are actually opinions. 👍
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:49 PM
1

Wait...I thought you weren't responding any more to this "toxic thread". And, yes, anecdotal evidence... Might want to look up the definition of "anecdotal", moron. By the way, right in the link itself, it refers to opinion meaning is an "opinion-based article", dumbass.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:35 PM
-1

Yeah? So what?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 05:55 PM
1

Have a good one. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out, moron. And your anecdotal evidence is sh1t. Might as well take it with you when you go. 👍
/r/MensRights14/04/22 05:53 PM
2

Every human being on the planet risks death every day, whether they realize it or not, just by existing. Walking out the front door increases that risk dramatically, but death can occur just by existing in our homes, as well. Do women think they shouldn't have to risk their lives or health to be part of this society. I guess they could shut themselves in their homes and hope for the best.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 05:51 PM
5

Would that be the worst thing in the universe? Nope. If the father wants the child, is 9 months really such an incredible expectation? Men have found out they're not actually the father of their "children" 20 - 30 years down the road, after being used as a stand-in, substitute "walking wallet" for decades. Some have suicided after the revelation that they were just used as a child-rearing funding source.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:08 AM
1

Hahahahaha...You're pretty funny. Or a moron. I'm not entirely sure which, yet. Maybe a little of both.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:34 AM
2

Gynocentrism and Kindercentrism are both alive and well, globally.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:26 AM
1

Yes, censorship is great for morons and liberals...Oh, wait... Liberals ARE morons...
/r/MensRights13/04/22 11:12 PM
2

The 1st amendment does apply to corporations, in that corporations are made up of individuals. Individuals sign NDA's in return for gainful employment. And who cares if it's not "mainstream": when it's driven underground, it's done illegally, requiring police to investigate and pursue any offenders (read as expending ever larger amounts of public resources). Offenders are prosecuted by the Court system (read as expending ever larger amounts of public resources), and then incarcerated in the pena…
/r/MensRights12/04/22 03:13 AM
3

Not when the price is the death or diminishment of the 1st amendment. They've not eliminated violence by censorship. They've just driven it elsewhere, kinda' like prohibition. Prohibition didn't stop anyone from drinking, just drove them into illegal underground speakeasies.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 09:00 PM
2

It's a question of Frequency, Intensity and duration... Excessive frequency, excessive Intensity, excessive duration or any combination of the above is absolutely mental, emotional and/or spiritual abuse. Where men's abuse, whether justified or not, typically arrives in a flood, like a broken dam, women's abuse of men is delivered in a drip, drip, drip, like a leaky faucet (usually building up behind the dam, if the man doesn't have a responsible, reliable and functional "relief valve"). As ther…
/r/MensRights11/04/22 07:15 PM
3

One of the few things that are actually perfectly "fair" is the unfairness of life itself. The circumstances of one's birth is rarely "fair". Who we're born to, the size and makeup of our families, the zip code we're born into, the period of time we're born into, even our particular "healthiness" (or lack thereof) circumstances are rarely "fair". Nature is perfectly "fair" in its simple absence of its concern about "fairness".
/r/MensRights09/04/22 12:23 AM
3

Ummm... Lots of good advice in this thread. One more bit of good advice - Make sure to wear a condom every time. Or get snipped. Or limit vaginal intercourse to women that are 50+. All their eggs are generally- speaking expended/exhausted by that post-menopausal age.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 08:41 PM
5

Nailed it. Well stated.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 08:32 PM
1

I don't buy any of the Hollywood bs. 10 days before the Oscar's, a video was posted where he said "She's a devil"... referring to Jada...who apparently made him feel suicidal. Fast forward 10 days and he's "protecting her honor"? I call bs. Or they need to call a celebrity therapist, at least...
/r/MensRights29/03/22 05:22 AM
1

Of course... It's statistically improbable to be any other way. There are no perfectly monolithic blocks anywhere in any community. There are bound to be radical feminists on both sides of the political fence (likely far more on the liberal side of it, though.)
/r/MensRights27/03/22 07:47 PM
2

It's degrees on a "spectrum". Liberals are "orders of magnitude" more likely to be "radical" feminists...i.e. "extremist" feminists.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 07:36 PM
6

Only idiots think big government tyrants are a better solution, but hey...you do you.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:12 PM
3

Some lawyers specialize in misandristic law-fare.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 12:02 AM
5

A man works 2,000 hours a year to be penalized by the taking of 1,000 hours worth of his wages, for 6,570 days, for the mistake he made on just 1 day, and all for just doing what he's biologically programed to do. By my calculations, that's a 3,785% penalty... distributed over 18 years is 210% per year...17.5% per month... By comparison, the highest rate credit cards charge 25% APR or 2.08% per month. Any more than that and the government deems it Usury. The male "walking wallet" disorder defini…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:01 PM
7

The notion that all conflict, all aggressive behaviors are undesirable. There is such a thing as "good" conflict. There is such a thing as "good" aggressive behaviors. It depends on the intended purpose of the conflict and/or the aggressive behaviors. Take for example "internal conflict"... this occurs in people who want their actions to serve a positive outcome, as opposed to a negative one. Properly navigated internal conflict can lead to improved self- esteem, improved confidence, improved de…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 10:24 PM
3

Solid righteous take, good sir!
/r/MensRights17/03/22 11:49 PM
7

I do agree that female leaders are just as likely to take their countries to war. Many female leaders understand that, to protect their citizens, the only historically reasonable response to aggression is equivalent (or greater, as the circumstances demand) aggression. Also, it's not whether or not female leaders are "willing"... It's whether or not the female leaders pick up a weapon and head out to the front lines. Everything else are "just words". People lie. Men lie, with words. Women lie, w…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 05:41 PM
0

Whether men and women like it, pregnancy and the rearing of very young children tend to fall squarely on women's shoulders. I call bs. That was a prevailing cultural expectation, and not one that ALL men liked, wanted, accepted or followed. And this is also changing fast, keeping pace with the changes in our culture. Men have paid prices for adhering to this antiquated cultural expectation, having been stereotyped as "absent fathers". To which, I heartily pronounce "bs". If you want to further t…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 11:03 PM
1

I don't think gender-specific abortion is ever justified... Regardless of which gender. And, while your 10 minute internet search wasn't seemingly super fruitful, that doesn't mean it isn't real. I've seen enough of it to lean towards, "It might be a real thing... maybe." I'm not dismissing anything, sight-unseen, these days, since there's all manner of insanity being accommodated lately. By the way, the fact that statistics don't exist...a complete absence...may be, simply, that no one cares en…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 01:20 AM
1

You'd have a hard time proving ANY motivation behind an abortion. All a woman would have to say is, "I'm not ready to be a mother", and no one will care whether their reason is truthful, because no one can prove otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 12:47 AM
1

Spend more time on Social Media. I'm sure you'll find it. Just look adjacent to the hashtag KillAllMen or KAM for short. That seems to include ones "in utero", for some.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 11:45 PM
1

You call them excuses and are choosing to get personal, shrug clearly it's part of the law and our system wether we like it or not. There are a giant number of ramifications that would come into play if men could choose wether they wanted to be financially responsible or not. I care about other people's problems. I care about my problems more. And if we don't discuss these laws, they will never change. I don't give a crap about the ramifications; they're not my problem. Seems like women would ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 11:41 PM
1

I'd like to hear what your thoughts are about women who selectively choose abortion, based on gender - as in, "If it's a boy, it's an abortion. If it's a girl, get the Gender Reveal party planned."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 11:00 PM
1

Most birth control have side effects, costs not covered by insurance, and you have to skip from one to another until you figure it out. A lot of men refuse to wear condoms. And again, even wearing a condom that breaks, and then taking the morning after pill can fail. It's okay that you don't have empathy towards this, but I'm explaining why it isn't as simple as you may think. Excuses are like buttholes...Everyone's got one. And it seems like you buy into all of them, then parrot them right back…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 10:46 PM
1

Child support isn't benefiting women that carry fetuses, it helps pay for children that now exist. You don't start paying child support when the woman gets pregnant. Ummm. No. The cost incurred DURING the pregnancy aren't technically child support, but the man starts paying immediately during the pregnancy, too. You think the man gets to escape those costs? You're funny. When a married woman becomes pregnant, the law automatically assumes that her husband is the child’s legal and biological fath…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 10:13 PM
1

I know what Gentile means. No. I'm not suggesting making the Bris illegal. It's about hearts and minds, not legislation. I'm merely calling attention to the observable, objective fact that there are Gentiles that do circumcise and Gentiles who don't circumcise. Most Muslims practice circumcision. Many Christians practice circumcision. We all worship the same God, just disagree what human prophets to follow. New Testament-based Christians think Jesus is the human embodiment of God. Old Testament-…
/r/MensRights07/03/22 09:40 PM
1

Agency and Responsibility are (or should be) indelibly connected. You want more agency (more "my body, my choice"), then you should realize the Responsibility (financial, etc) that comes with it. If you don't want the financial responsibility, as a woman, don't get pregnant. There are like 14 forms of female contraceptives now. So, stop blaming men for ALL the "oopsie" pregnancies. It (usually) takes 2 mistakes for a accidental pregnancy; the man failing to use contraception and the woman failin…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 09:02 PM
2

Things that can happen rarely and accidentally during circumcision are in fact the intention of a cliterodectomy. Not sure if you've been keeping up on the news, but the growing number of women intentionally cutting off men's penises, as a form of unilaterally-determined, illegal "punishment", for rape and other types of abuse, is in fact growing and becoming more common. The growth of a "bad behavior" usually only occurs in a vacuum, when there is no law or the prevailing laws are executed poor…
/r/MensRights07/03/22 08:40 PM
3

This isn't about gender - it's about anatomy. A clitoridectomy is not the equivalent of a circumcision. It is the equivalent to chopping off the entire glans ("head") of the penis. Disagree. Firstly, some botched circumcisions actually result in the need to completely remove the glans. Secondly, one only needs to damage, whether intentionally or unintentionally, the Frenulum and a man will lose, or severely decrease, his ability to enjoy sex and/or reach ejaculation, just like FGM does. FGM does…
/r/MensRights07/03/22 08:01 PM
1

By the way, it's not just Gentiles...It's also Islam and Judaism. The only group that I'm currently aware of, that's prohibited circumcision, are the Catholics. And many of them still do circumcision, despite the Pope's decree.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 06:58 PM
3

You've completely blown right on past the influence of the religious leadership. It's not just the AMA, since the AMA (just like the plurality of other organizations) is made up of people with varying, various religious beliefs (which have a variety of responsive edicts concerning circumcision). Also, it's interesting that you ascribe different, entirely subjective levels of severity based along gender lines. It's almost like you think women are weaker or more deserving of protection than men. L…
/r/MensRights07/03/22 06:49 PM
5

Would you say the same about the feminists who constantly hammer on the horrible practice of Female Genital Mutilation?
/r/MensRights07/03/22 06:26 PM
1

Agreed on all points. However, the new liberal moron forever-changing, robotically chanted word of the minute is "Equity"...As in, "Equity" for me, but not for thee. Waiting for the next moronic word-drop.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 11:04 PM
0

Probably moreso if the single parent is a single mother. Better for the kid, generally speaking, if the single parent is a man. Men generally acknowledge the way a society is and find ways to live within it. Women seem to generally desire to change the world and complain about what it "isn't" and how it "should be".
/r/MensRights05/03/22 11:05 PM
0

This tired old false trope again? This has been debunked umpteen times. Even by an Ivy League Female PhD Economist. Apparently, we're in a "Post- Truth" society. Math and Economics are both hard Sciences. Resultingly, RadFems must then be "Science Deniers".
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 04:21 AM
1

Fun fact: The plurality of employees in K-12 are, in fact, women.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 07:35 PM
2

Thank you for the correction. Damn autoerror.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 05:16 AM
5

There's no good time to tell feminists they're wrong, because the true believers can't handle the cognitive dissonance. Agreed. But that's exactly why men need to be persistent and hammering on about men's issues. It's obvious that only a small continent of women will speak up for men and there's a very small continent of women who won't ever shut up about women's issues. Unfortunately, we've entered a time in our society where the "squeaky wheel gets the grease", all while attempting to diminis…
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:13 AM
12

His question is pretty clear; Where are all the RadFems, in light of the current conflict, and he's not wrong. Either eliminate the draft or increase its "equity", since "Representation Matters" (unless you're a professional athlete). He isn't suggesting that women never participate or that they don't do great things. He's suggesting that the hot-air RadFems are full of bs. His timing might have been better, but then RadFems are constantly, persistently hammering on men, the so-called "patriarch…
/r/MensRights01/03/22 12:31 AM
1

All good questions. Only time will tell.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:59 PM
1

What's good for the Goose must be good for the Gander. Said every RadFem ever.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 03:53 AM
5

The RadFems have made it FAR more efficient to railroad men into the ground.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 03:51 AM
3

BeLiEvE alL WyMxN! Oh... Wait... /s
/r/MensRights21/02/22 10:46 PM
1

Ummm...I know. Hence the /s for "sarcasm".
/r/MensRights21/02/22 09:48 PM
0

Well, it's not "reality" if it's just a video game. /s
/r/MensRights21/02/22 06:01 PM
1

Did you notice the part where I said they "tend towards". There are no monolithic groups in our society and no "one-size-fits-all" theories. There are always "exceptions to the rule (or theory, if that fits better for you). Any time there's 3 or more occurrences being "observed" (in this case, people), statistically-speaking, there will be "ouliers" that don't fit the theory. Your anecdotal evidence doesn't "disprove" the theory...It just proves that nothing...no theory...is accurate 100% of the…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 03:56 PM
1

Exactly why I think you're a taint-pustule. Trolls are taint-pustules by default.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 10:31 PM
1

This has grown boring. Have a day, schmegma-chunk.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:39 PM
1

Most everyone on reddit has had to learn the hard way that /s indicates sarcasm. Now, it's practically expected. But, hey, you and your dumbass buddy are just an exception, right? Just because you are a moron, you don't need to project your stupidity and lunacy to others.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 07:58 PM
1

an stupid dumbass Ummm...You're calling me stupid? You don't seem to know when to use "a" or "an", moron.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 07:07 AM
1

Hey fuck-stain...You seem to have the same level of retardation as your buddy, who you're white-knighting for. Not sure why you feel compelled to defend someone who insulted this entire community. Read the fucking thread, jizz-smear. Then fuck right the hell off and take your troll-douche buddy with you.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 06:58 AM
2

Gee, thanks, Mr. White Knight... Now, I can sleep at night. He's still a douche-nugget. So, how about you fuck off and mind your own business. 🙂🖕
/r/MensRights20/02/22 05:34 AM
3

Ummm...Yes. Almost everything, if not actually everything.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 06:21 PM
2

Facts. The so-called Gender Wage Gap has been debunked multiple times, even by a female Ivy League Economist PhD. It's only the Liberal "Science Deniers", the willfully ignorant and morons who still believe the ancient generalizations, that are the foundations of this "junk science", that supposedly underpin this issue. It's true that this was, once, an issue, when men were financially responsible for the entire household. However, it stopped being an issue decades ago and, yet, the extreme over…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:49 PM
16

Planned obsolescence.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 10:56 PM
1

You don't even know me and yet you feel like you can critique me and my intellect. Just another indication that you're clearly an arrogant piece of shit, who thinks they're "better than" others. Go fuck yourself, ass-clown. Have a nice life, shit-smear.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 03:57 AM
1

You specifically identified yourself as a troll. You trolled the group and then called everyone stupid. Seems you're the shit-bag... The fly in the soup that ruins it. You're the child, jizz-smear. You're welcome to make your hasty exit any time you'd like. Go ruin someone else's day, shit-stain. 👍🙂
/r/MensRights14/02/22 03:08 AM
1

Nah...I've wasted enough time on your little temper tantrums and burp-vomit, infantile douche-nozzle.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 02:26 AM
5

Man-Spreading actually has science behind it. Heat diminishes/kills semen production. Want children? Shut up about man-spreading. Then you'll be able to conceive children. If you don't want children, then I guess you don't have a "horse in that race". This is why I don't take my life-advice from activist teenagers (in fact, some never grow past this), no matter how many times people robotically say, "But...They're the future!" They're also missing decades of life-experience and are patently idea…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 09:31 PM
8

Gaps are usually "amplified" by the stakeholders, while diminishing the opinions of others...others who can and should rightfully carry and express their own self-interests, loudly and proudly, in the face of tyrannical suppression and diminishment, on account of their legitimate "personhood". The stakeholders aren't always the entire population of a society. They only represent their "collective", rarely the entire society, as a whole. Yes, do consider the audience, but also consider the speake…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 09:06 PM
2

I think it's pretty equal... we both need each other rather equally. Neither one survives more than a few generations, without the other. The abscense of one or the other is the harbinger of the decline, and inevitable exit, of humanity from this planet.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 04:58 AM
2

Chaos needs order & order needs chaos. They are 2 sides of the same coin. They are connected. Chaos needs order, so that complete Chaos never becomes reality. Order needs Chaos to have something to create order out of. Men tend towards making order out of chaos. Women tend towards being chaotic.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:12 AM
8

A better world for who? Probably not men. The plurality of Women's conflict-intolerance would inevitably put men in the "doghouse" until the conflict-intolerant women shockingly conclude that they need some "conflict resolution", to resolve the naturally occurring conflict between women and between human / nature, which couldn't be eradicated by simply putting the men in the doghouse. Then put the men back in the doghouse after use. Putting men in the doghouse won't eliminate conflict. Conflict …
/r/MensRights11/02/22 08:04 PM
1

Also, just so you know: the only people who use emojis are small little children, or trolls. Sounds like you fit both descriptions, jizz-smear.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 01:03 AM
2

You know where the proverbial door is... anytime you want to make your exit, moron.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 12:53 AM
2

Trolls ARE morons, by default. Just own it, douche- dribble.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 12:09 AM
2

Ah...You're still just a moron...Thanks for clearing that up for me.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 12:03 AM
3

"Laughing emojis" notwithstanding, if you're original response was sarcasm, then the way to indicate that in reddit is "/s". If it wasn't sarcasm, then you're still just a moron.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 11:59 PM
9

Some people have ideas, or haven't fully "cemented" their ideas in stone just yet... At least, not inflexible bullshit "beliefs" like yours.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 01:15 AM
2

Nah. This is just to add legitimacy to an illegitimate concept, to suggest it's been "fixed" by the lefties, so they can add one to the Win column. It's never been fixed, because it was never really a legitimate problem. So sayeth female Ivy League PhD economists...Or isn't economics, math and statistics a "science"? Create the "problem" out of thin air, then claim it "fixed". Nah. I don't buy it.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 01:12 AM
1

I apparently misunderstood what you meant by "self-correcting". Feminism won't correct it's own overcorrection. That will be up to all the Humanists, Masculinists, moderate Feminists, and non-Feminists. Maybe some RadFems will see the error of their extremist views, but probably not many. There are cultural issues here, too. Most religions honor and inadvertently indemnify women. It's a really weird planet, at the moment. Social Media has shrunk the world by orders of magnitude and has enabled b…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 06:09 PM
1

Self-correcting? Not sure I'd agree with that...Feminism changes with the wind... constantly adding another dozen grievances for everyone to attempt to determine concurrence, truthiness, usefulness, impact, applicability, etc...I think this is intended to psychologically destabilize and demoralize more than anything else. When dealing with culture or societal-level narratives (usually appeals to morality and ethics), in the eyes of the ComProgs, the minds of the traditionalists (or the complacen…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 05:22 PM
1

I mostly agree. But here's an interesting observation: we all have our childhoods to "overcome". No one escapes having a crappy childhood, in one manner or another. I do agree that single-parenthood is absolutely one of the root destroyers of "peace", "harmony" and the wellbeing of all children. This is also an issue of Traditionalism vs Modernism: women want all the "moral goods" (none of the "bad") of Traditionalism, and all the "moral goods" (none of the "bad") of Modernism. That's the basic …
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:42 PM
2

I agree. This is about responsibility... Responsible Adultiness... The heavy lifting isn't going to lift itself. Someone's still gotta do it. If women want to step up to the "heavy lifting" plate, then I'm gonna let them take a swing. Some will be successful. Some will fail miserably. Just like any human-being. Failure is just as much a female thing as it is a male thing. This is how excessively optimistic women learn that it's "not as easy as it looks". Men are incentivized to make the "heavy l…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:25 PM
2

I generally agree, but MGTOW isn't workable for all men. I'm a humanist. I'm open to interaction with, and being in relationships with women. I'm a most-of-the-time MGTOW in the sense that I'm perfectly willing to let women discover directly all the sufferings and miseries that men have endured, on behalf of women, for which they're entirely or partially ungrateful for. If I found a proper female match for myself, I wouldn't shut her out just on principal. Still, I'm perfectly happy to sit back …
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:10 PM
2

There's definitely a realignment in the works. Women are definitely embracing "lazy and irresponsible slacker" in droves. I'm perfectly OK with allowing the simps to be simps...to exhaust and destroy themselves, chasing the "lazy and irresponsible" gynocentric radical feminists, who will treat them like 2nd class citizens, indentured servants and trickle out any meaning, purpose, kindness or equality, in order to control them. I mean, I wish for simps to have greater respect for themselves, as m…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 03:52 PM
2

Or they simply believe that life can be rendered "safe" and free of all pain, suffering and conflict. Someone should let them in on the "not-so-secret" secret that it can't be done. Life isn't all "peace" and "love"... Unfortunately, no one can make it so, no matter who told them they could. Life will always contain suffering, pain, and conflict, despite the best efforts of humankind. Men tend to understand this far more often than women do.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 08:00 AM
4

Apparently, the "fairer gender" has sunk to genocide.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:45 AM
12

There's no need to gender this shit in the first place. Just give everyone a wellness day and encourage them to take care of themselves. Facts!
/r/MensRights07/02/22 01:54 AM
2

I think it waters down the urgency for pair-bonding, so I'm not in favor. Also not in favor of artificial human semen, for the same reason. https://youtu.be/RoHvNrSj3sE Human beings are stupid. One of the biggest challenges human beings face is depression, due loneliness and isolation. So what do we do? Reduce the urgency to interact with other humans, in a pair-bonding manner, since it's "too hard"...or "They just can't understand me and never will"...or "Women are crazy"... or "Men are dogs/cr…
/r/MensRights06/02/22 12:55 AM
1

Yes. Get it on record what your stance on the whole situation is. We currently live in the "prove it" society. If you don't and have no proof? No one will care and you'll be the loser in any future court proceedings. If you're a person who thinks of himself as worthy of being heard and "protected", a TRO is your first and best option.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 09:17 PM
1

Someone, usually women at the forefront of the lynching crowd, will always have a problem with any preference any man might have, no matter how "benign" you may think it may be.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 04:40 AM
2

Get Woke, go broke. As if anyone on this planet is completely "Woke" anyway. It takes pure arrogance to even suggest such a thing about oneself. Only morons claim to be "Woke".
/r/MensRights02/02/22 02:55 AM
3

Check to see if your state is One Party Consent or Two Party Consent. If it's One Party Consent, then YOU can be the consenting party, unless you already signed away your rights on a corporate waiver of some kind.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 10:15 PM
1

People use to care if a person was found guilty, in a court of law. While this is still relevant information, the simple accusation is now a powerful weapon for injury and destruction, with the arrival of social media, giving an even larger platform for Reputation destroyers (more often women, than men, but men do this as well). Tech, much like everything else in life, is a dual edged bladed weapon. It can create. It can also destroy. In real life. The damage is plain to see, if the observer isn…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 09:48 PM
4

Some lies (read "False accusations") destroy reputations (that took decades to build sometimes), lifelong incomes, nest eggs, and ultimately lives (read "suicide"), much like yelling "Fire" in a crowded theater. False accusations are the worst kind of lie and should be aggressively investigated, but rarely ever are, because money and reputation are not as important as "vagina power"...I mean, no one's dead, right?!?! Just broke, with a destroyed reputation and put on a potential path towards sui…
/r/MensRights29/01/22 09:46 PM
1

I know, right!?!? Here's a link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey_badger_(men%27s_rights)
/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:42 PM
2

Web-search for keyword "Honey Badgers" (not the animals... the humans) for details about female MRA's.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 09:53 PM
2

Yes, it's all different races. Doubtful that anyone here cares about skin-tone... People in this group are more interested in discussing men's rights, and if they're smart, that discussion will be with anyone who is willing to listen.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 09:50 PM
4

Disagree. Abuse is abuse. "Degrees" of abuse are entirely subjective. As in, one person might stub their pinkie toe and identify the pain as a 10, on a scale of 1 to 10... "The worst pain of their lives". And another may break a leg and limp into the ED with a 7 on the same 10 point scale. Pain and suffering has no empirical number on the scale. Pain and suffering are entirely "subjective" on an individual basis. That's why every doctor, in every ED, hangs a "Pain Chart" and asks every conscious…
/r/MensRights28/01/22 09:46 PM
4

Seems to me that transgressions against men affect men of all colors and creeds, regardless of skin tone.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 09:37 PM
2

You do realize that you may be arguing with a left-leaning "Agitprop" bot? This "person" has a relatively new account... Negative Comment Karma, only 4 actually post and but a boatload of comments? Probably a bot.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 10:00 PM
1

The "3 cakes" mentality is purely the realm of the "Risk Intolerant" cowards who will likely become housebound sweatpant wearing shut-ins before too long. Life is filled with risk, from beginning to end. Some people think risk can be "eradicated". Hint: It can't be eradicated and the risk intolerant cowards will continue to attempt to "eradicate" all risk, but fail miserably. They'll grow completely confused by their failure, but keep trying... And the rest of society will suffer for their lunac…
/r/MensRights26/01/22 03:11 AM
51

I'm guessing he was probably saying that as the doctor was reattaching his severed fucking finger, douche-nugget. Try getting your finger severed by a neurotic crazy b1tch and see if you mind all your P's & Q's. You got the stink of Liberal intolerant douche-baggery all over ya'. "Cancelling" individuals isn't a moral good, isn't done by "moral hero's" and it isn't "okay". Cancel Culture is the endeavor of the morally corrupt liberal douche-bag lefties. "Cancel Culture" is the morally deficient …
/r/MensRights26/01/22 02:26 AM
2

File a police report. Nothing gets idiots attention like a police officer showing up at the administration office.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:45 AM
6

I guess mass Genocide isn't a community concern for Twitter... Unless it's genocide against women or children. Go Gynocentrism! Go Kindercentrism! /s
/r/MensRights19/01/22 08:50 PM
4

It's hilarious...A rallying tag that is tantamount to a call for genocide. In fact, a level genocide far greater than Hitler, Pol Pot, Mussolini combined. Women are definitely no longer the "fairer sex". Their sick neurosis has overwhelmed their desire for an even playing field. Did any of the Social Media tech companies react to this call for genocide? Nope.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 09:00 PM
1

Post-partum depression or... They're simply homicidal, neurotic nuts (that can't be ruled out).
/r/MensRights14/01/22 03:01 AM
3

Interesting thought: If she had been arrested (like almost any man would have been, if the shoes were reversed), she might actually still be alive (having been incarcerated and entirely unavailable for potential homicide by an SO).
/r/MensRights13/01/22 10:25 PM
2

Nah. I don't support racism of any kind. Did you not read that I don't watch "popular tv". You must be a special kind of moron. Choke on a bag of richards, jizz-smear. 👍 The NFL is 70% black, which is WAY over they're 14% population density (by 56%...not just a "couple"). If we're making it about "Representation", then it needs to be about representation ALL THE TIME or not at all. That's called "consistency" and "fairness". By the way, if it's 60% representation of "white people", in TV and mov…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 05:21 AM
3

It's funny that they say "Representation Matters" and then they proceed to fail to represent everyone. For every black person (14%), in the US, there are 6 other "white people". If an alien landed on the planet and didn't know any better, watching modern TV and movies, they'd be lead to believe that we live in an African matriarchal community, full of lesbians and transgender people. I no longer watch "popular" television and no longer listen to "popular" music. I no longer watch NFL (70% black …
/r/MensRights13/01/22 03:24 AM
1

I dunno...Women who actually like men? /s
/r/MensRights11/01/22 09:49 PM
1

I dunno... The drip, drip, dripping leaky faucet of Toxic Femininity... The "Honey Do" list that inevitably includes all of the heavy labor or disgusting/gross tasks that they never want to do. The incessant whining about the entirety of the "Honey do" list not getting 100% completed, despite them only taking the "light duty" tasks on their list...
/r/MensRights09/01/22 04:38 AM
2

especially when the apparent gap is adjusted to allow for women’s greater access for contraceptive, pregnancy, childcare & national screening purposes(contd)" So, first off...for this scenario, we're being asked to agree that there are only 2 sex's? My question: why are we giving "adjustments" for women's sexual health and maternal prerogatives, when no such adjustments are even acknowledged, despite their plain obviousness, in the repeatedly debunked "Gender Wage Gap" bs fallacy?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 11:18 PM
2

When a man improves himself, for no other reason than improving himself, all the "Return On Investment" belongs to him, for his benefit and use.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 05:04 AM
6

Be well-rounded. Learn a language. Learn how to reverse-engineer everything you can. Learn how to fix anything that breaks. Learn critical thinking. Learn how to create. Destroying a thing is easy. Creation and invention is far harder, far more complex and way more impressive. Learn how to win arguments (recognizing that you'll have to know absolutely as much as humanly possible about the debate topic to do so). Learn how to unlock locked locks (but only unlock locked locks that belong to you or…
/r/MensRights24/12/21 04:58 AM
3

Ummm..."Free The Nipple" and "Top Freedom" are enjoying some success in legalizing female toplessness in public. At least, in the US...In many other countries this isn't actually even a problem. Also, part of the segment of the population that wants to keep it illegal are women, seemingly out of jealousy, embarrassment or simply higher levels vanity or religious objections.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 11:24 PM
6

Kudos. Well stated.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 11:04 PM
4

I dunno...When they constantly complain about being excluded, perhaps the solution is NOT excluding them. Seems pretty straightforward to me. Problem solved. This is the constant tension between traditionalism and modernism. Unfortunately, being included means accepting the bad that comes with the good. It's a law of nature and the universe. Not even sure if someone's given this natural law of rewards and prices a name. I'll have to research that. Anyway, nothing good...no rewards are achieved/a…
/r/MensRights17/12/21 05:23 AM
0

You win the Internet today! Completely agree.👍👍👍👍
/r/MensRights16/12/21 09:51 PM
1

Maybe not in our lifetimes, but hopefully not. It'll never be "like it was"...It will be something new and different. The "revenge porn" misandry will backfire and a new "bastard child" will be born of mutual respect for both genders, with a more balanced tension between logic and feelings. Logic, truth and facts will always resurrect themselves, no matter how far gone they seem to be. This isn't a reason to "do nothing", just an acknowledgement that they will return through the actions of reaso…
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:18 PM
1

Ummm...Guys generally aren't cheating with "other men", so women are complicit, too...1:1 ratio. BOTH are cheaters. From a guy whose been cheated on by a woman, but never cheated himself.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 10:43 PM
3

Female bosses act like douchebags and "hanging judges" because they think they have to "prove themselves", in a stereotyped bs perspective that it's a "man's world". It's not some fake-ass patriarchy that radical feminazis would have you believe. The higher one gets in the hierarchy, the more hyper-egalitarian it gets, to the degree that some people who shouldn't be anywhere near management or supervision of others are, in fact, managers and supervisors. This is through nepotism, favoritism and …
/r/MensRights09/12/21 10:23 PM
1

Oh, I'm not sold that such things necessarily even exist or should be labeled. I'm aware that ALL humans possess the potential to be "Toxic". Still, there are "trends" that display common "traits", while they apply to ALL humans, have a higher level of occurrence and density within one chromosomal group compared to another.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:47 PM
2

Soliciting for men to practice Toxic Masculinity and "protect women". I thought women are capable of protecting themselves and don't need men's protection.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 03:52 AM
0

Sexist and misandrist.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 03:47 AM
16

They'll just go out and get pregnant before they can be drafted. Nothing like using a zygote/kid to justify/side-step the law, service to country and invoke the uterine exemption/uterine privilege! Kinda' like many women in the US Navy already do. It's called "gaming the system". A positive pregnancy test, presented days before an "at sea" deployment, and poof...No "At Sea" deployments. They get to stay land-bound and state-side. Probably for the best anyway. Can you imagine a pregnant, fully ho…
/r/MensRights01/12/21 10:25 PM
2

Nah. I don't get snacks in the middle of the night. That's for sleepless little commie asshole, like yourself, trying to dream up new ways to make shifty ideas, like UBI, sound good. Good luck with that, asshat.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 03:53 PM
0

Hahaha... What a whiny douchebag, resorting to "literalism" to justify their shitty take. Okay...99.999% of business owners are subject to ambition beyond "survivalism". Entrepreneurs don't start businesses to just eek out a living, you onerous little shit-monger. You ever started a business? Probably not, I'm guessing. Another wannabe subject matter expert with zero insight. I hope your balls drop soon, you infant fuck-stain.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 05:17 AM
0

By the way, do I actually need to list every owner of the Fortune 5,000, ya' little socialist douche-sludge?
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:27 AM
0

Even failed Entrepreneurs are driven by ambition to far exceed "survivalism", you little Anti-Capitalist, commie shit-bag.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:19 AM
2

I agree. Win-Lose always has its roots in revenge. That's what the Liberals are all about; Revenge. That's why I avoid liberals like the plague. They don't have a clue about actual true compassion or true kindness...Just their "version" that stems entirely out of revenge. Someone must Lose for them to Win.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 10:38 PM
0

Yeah. Elon Musk is all about survival, shit-smear. He's just making sure he can put food on the table, next week. Go fuck yourself, anal-leakage.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 09:43 PM
2

That why Win-Lose never works... Someone always gets forced to subjugate themselves. The truth is Life subjugates everyone - no one person more than any other, just differently. We don't need to add to life's already consistent subjugation of every living thing.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 09:14 PM
0

You say that like career ambition hasn't been responsible for every single Entrepreneur / Business Owner on the planet. Be better, dumbass.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:42 PM
1

Exceptionally well stated. 👍
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:41 PM
3

Stepping on the necks of your vanquished "enemy" is Win-Lose. What modern men likely want is Win-Win; to be relieved of their historical stereotypes, obstacles and hindrances. Yes, men have them too. I have no problem with aiding women with overcoming their stereotypes, obstacles and hindrances, as long as they're willing to genuinely acknowledge, and aid with the relief of, men's historical stereotypes, obstacles and hindrances...It's called reciprocity. If there's no reciprocity, then women ca…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:38 PM
3

Exceptionally well stated!
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:29 PM
3

If you're under the age of 18 (in most states in the US... Some are as low as 16), then you aren't legally considered able to form the consent necessary for "adult actions"... You can't sign contracts, drink alcohol, smoke, or consent to sexual intercourse. The courts have determined that, in such matters, the state pursues prosecution as a matter of the states interests. The state doesn't need "the consent of the governed" to prosecute pedophilia, as it's considered to be horrific and entirely …
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:51 AM
4

Men have no choice in the matter. Once the bun is in the oven, he has zero control of his wallet or his future.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:43 AM
5

Condoms DO have a "failure rate". Check the manufacturers website or actually READ the box.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:41 AM
3

Most of those have abortions or adopt out the child, since they don't want a "constant reminder" of the event (as if memories can just be erased or forgotten). There is some truth, in that the reminder would be daily, as opposed to maybe being able to go a few days memory- free. It's the frequency, not the actual memory of the trauma. The memory will never be forgotten, but the frequency of the memory will be lower.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:40 AM
5

It cracks me up when idiots are so sure of themselves, as they spout actual idiocy at every turn. You're even funnier than most.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:35 AM
5

You can waive your parental rights, BUT you STILL have to pay child support. No such thing as "Financial Abortion" anywhere in the US. Nice try though.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:33 AM
6

Some men don't find out for decades that "you are NOT the father" of multiple children. I'll see if I can find the link...
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:28 AM
1

Gents, protect your seed. When you protect your seed, you also protect your wallet, your bank account and your future. Family court is no friend to men. It's one of the most powerful Governmental entities that demands (enforces) for men to "man up" and "take responsibility" even if they took the necessary precautions or were non-consenting. Effectively, Family Court is THEE purveyor of Toxic Masculinity, if such a thing even exists. If it does exist, then Family Court is the largest Governmental…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:19 AM
10

Toxic Femininity is a real thing, despite it being like a leaky faucet...drip, drip, drip...instead of a flood (how men usually emote theirs). Enough single drips, consistently over a period of time, can indeed cause a deeply disastrous flood. Such is the way of Toxic Femininity.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 10:36 PM
19

Not in chronological order: Kneed in the testes. Cheated on by 2 separate ex-girlfriends. Sexual abuse by female sitter. 4 separate females. 4 separate incidents.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 09:39 PM
1

Cause' it's all about the children!?!? Kindercentrism is apparently still alive and well...and idiotic.
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/21 03:53 AM
3

Gang Members represent less than 1% of society, so the 99.9% gentlemen is probably more accurate than your dumbass "whataboutism".
/r/MensRights13/11/21 09:17 PM
0

Hillary for Prison Whenever, preferably now.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 09:15 PM
2

Beautiful bastards! You give us all freedom, liberty, and self-determination. Couldn't possibly love and respect you warfighters more than I already do. Ooh-rah soldiers!
/r/MensRights13/11/21 03:45 AM
5

"Does not equal" is usually signified by 2 equal signs separated by a Forward Slash: =/= Technically, you overlay a single equal sign with a forward slash, but that's not easily accessible on most keyboards. I mean Feminism is the death of humor... Much like all the other member groups of the Liberal "Tribe".
/r/MensRights12/11/21 10:22 PM
1

SMFH...🥴🥴🥴
/r/MensRights11/11/21 09:07 PM
1

Doesn't seem to be the right question. Perhaps they are the "most impacted", but I doubt it. I think a better question is; Are women proveably "Gross Polluters"? The answer is, "Yes", with all their hair products, skin care products and the greater users of Healthcare, which is probably the single largest consumer/ generator of "single-use plastics". Doesn't seem like anyone is complaining about the incinerators the healthcare industry uses daily to burn biological waste.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 03:47 AM
7

Use to think of myself as a "Feminist", until I realized that the most radical versions want to step on the necks of men and that they have no real concern or compassion for the men, in the middle, who are decent. They turn "men" into a monolithic group, who are all "toxic". Nah. There's plenty of us men who are decent, hardworking people who want to provide for our families. That doesn't preclude women from being decent, hardworking people who want to provide for their families. The Gender Wage…
/r/MensRights31/10/21 07:24 PM
2

I guess that's what happens when the committee is 3/5ths (60%) female.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 06:05 PM
3

It's well documented that there's always been a woman behind the historical men in power, who often used sex as a motivator to manipulate powerful men or punish them for not doing what they wanted. The myth of the oppressed female class, and hence the bs myth of the patriarchy, is all bogus and has never been true. What is the difference of you rule from the podium or from behind the human "curtain"? Very little difference whatsoever. Practically nil. From a reformed feminist, turned Humanist (w…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 08:22 PM
5

That's nothing new. With 330M people in our society, there's always someone who wants to knock someone else down. So, how is that different from any other day?
/r/MensRights23/10/21 10:59 PM
-2

Very few people, known as sociopaths, actually go out of their way to "hurt people". Most hurts by the overwhelmingly decent people in our society aren't malicious, but inadvertent or based in "slow to change" culture. And, yet, different people have different ideas about what types of "injuries" are truly important (as opposed to the "hurts" that individuals (not entire groups) deem non-lethal and generally harmless). There are 330 Million individual notions about what "Be better" means. What's…
/r/MensRights23/10/21 10:39 PM
-11

Be better? Your version of "better" or mine? Is my version of "better" not legitimate or worthy? Only your version is legitimate or worthy?
/r/MensRights23/10/21 08:38 PM
9

They'll do what they've become trained/indoctrinated to do, and now some do practically unconsciously (if there is such a thing as "unconscious bias", then by definition it must work BOTH ways.) The Liberal indoctrination has been successful with quite a few, since it abuses, tortures and twists existing sources of kindness and goodwill, turning them fugly... The Liberal orthodoxy abuses human nature in that it takes goodwill, decent behavior, and a desire for continuous improvement, and applies…
/r/MensRights23/10/21 08:08 PM
12

I wouldn't say it's thriving... It may be growing, but it's sickening, stumbling and faltering more and more, even as it grows. "Thriving" only happens when XX and XY (and all the naturally occurring variations) work together...Otherwise, the inherent suffering of being a living being only grows worse, when one group attempts to "enforce their will" and their "unshared" version of Utopia on everyone else. One person's version of Utopia probably doesn't match my version of Utopia. I'm still figur…
/r/MensRights23/10/21 07:58 PM
1

I think we'll see more bad behavior perpetrated by women. More women means, statistically, more female "bad apples" among the crowd. And, yes, definitely more bias against men.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 07:38 PM
11

True facts. This ^
/r/MensRights22/10/21 11:07 PM
13

She must have gargled gallons of dick-sauce, for dick size verification purposes. You know, for science...🤪
/r/MensRights22/10/21 11:05 PM
4

Men will date/marry down once, maybe twice... Then they'll realize that there's no upside to doing so, learn the lesson and then will date/marry equals or more successful exclusively.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 12:05 AM
6

So, despite women being the far greater "gross polluters" and the far greater consumer of tax receipts and subsidies, men are still the "bad guys". Unreal.
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/21 08:06 PM
5

👍... Good on ya' for your success!
/r/MensRights18/10/21 07:54 PM
6

Glad to hear about your individual success, but this isn't about you, as an individual. This is about the society you live in. It won't matter how much money you make when the woke mob invokes (and mandates), without your consent (the consent that they talk about sooooo persistently), their version of Utopia (which you probably won't be "celebrated" in... more likely shamed in for all your success and wealth), but, by then, you won't have any other choice. Welcome to Utopia.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 07:39 PM
10

Unsurprisingly, this imbalance doesn’t magically correct itself after graduation. Naturally, most women who have put the time, money and energy into earning a college degree might not be particularly thrilled by the prospect of settling down with man who hasn’t done the same, prompting what Galloway calls a “mating inequality” in the US. I guess the women are no better than the men, in this respect. I recall reading about how successful people seek out other equally (or more) successful partners…
/r/MensRights18/10/21 07:23 PM
23

While it definitely feels that way, Male suffering is not invisible to all humans. It is not invisible to me. There are many who recognize and acknowledge it and that group is growing.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 07:16 PM
0

The issue is there will soon be feminist protests at Kings College, but not a peep at Murray Edwards college.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:20 PM
3

Typically Hollywood douchebag mentality. Look at me! Look at me! Give me millions of dollars, just don't have any opinion about me or my body, despite me making fun of other people's bodies. Fucking hypocrite.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:18 PM
12

Because the woman said so, and everyone knows they never lie /s.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 05:54 AM
6

It's not anything any logical, reasonable, moderately egalitarian male asked for, to have all their spaces invaded and made "inclusive". That is the purvue of the hyper-egalitarian liberals, the most falsely jealous most excessively neurotic feminist nutbags, and the rag-tag coalition of the "supposedly" oppressed (who can't even agree with each other about more than one or two sequential thoughts), participating so earnestly and aggressively in the "Victim Olympics". Women's spaces have not bee…
/r/MensRights16/10/21 04:18 AM
37

So, if the men are good enough singers, shouldn't they be admitted to the female only chorale groups? Or is it "equality for me, but not for thee"?
/r/MensRights15/10/21 11:53 PM
2

I've been a caregiver for a family member for over a decade. The hyper-egalitarian UN feminist dumbasses can stfu and stick it where the sun doesn't shine.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 07:13 PM
1

Uh-huh. Just wait for the permafrost, in Siberia, to thaw, releasing all the worst diseases of the past and ones that humanity hasn't even witnessed yet. That's called science, shit-smear. Just because "power" is not tangible, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Just because "power" is not tangible, doesn't mean shit-stains like you should be trusted with it. Suck muh wiener, tyranny-loving boot-licker.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:26 PM
2

Nope, no coddling here...
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:55 PM
0

Let's play the game called "Find the boot-licker"... Just found one! JCgamerX apparently joined the Borg collective, worships Tyrannical douchebags, and now mindlessly chants "Resistance is futile!"
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:52 PM
3

Cool. The woman should have to prove that they are (or were, at the time) using FDA-approved female contraception, in a best effort to prevent pregnancy, for each individual sexual interaction that could potentially result in pregnancy, as a prerequisite to any legal filing being approved or being allowed to move forward against any male, with the exception of any man who committed non-consensual assault or rape. And not just simple attestation or accusation; A signed court-approved affidavit, t…
/r/MensRights06/10/21 08:42 PM
3

No, it hasn't. Tech hasn't enabled anything more than fighting a war remotely. Did we win in Afghanistan? We have some of the best tech in the world. Much of it is stolen and recreated by tyrannical nations. All tech has done is decrease the number of lives lost in the shortest of short terms. But then we stay for 20 years and lose a bunch of lives anyway. In that sense, it's increased the arrogance of the civilian population and the arrogance of the bureaucrats who wield the tech. Tech hasn't w…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 05:57 AM
1

By the way, the complete failure of technology to "win wars" alone hasn't stopped anyone from "trying."
/r/MensRights05/10/21 03:51 AM
1

Fair enough, but the military isn't a democracy. The upper echelons deploy their resources (human and other) how they see fit, based on the generalized directions and political goals of the Commander In Chief, a non-military bureaucrat. You're talking about insurgencies and resistance movements. I'm talking about the chain of command, in a period of time (now) where safety is the highest priority...Not Freedom. Not Liberty. There is nothing more worshiped today than safety.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 03:49 AM
3

BFD... It's a low-risk, empty move... It's most likely that future wars will be fought by drones, remotely piloted war machines, and Elon Musk's new androids.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 11:46 PM
6

Even just the false allegation stuff would be a good start, but I absolutely agree 100%...
/r/MensRights04/10/21 11:06 PM
31

Women, like her: "Yes...the best defense IS a good offense." Sorry you're having to go through that, brother. Maybe men should get together and start [hashtag]BelieveAllMen or the [hashtag]MenToo movement.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 08:17 PM
31

Women, like her: "I WANT TO HAVE MY CAKE AND EAT IT, TOO, DUMMY!
/r/MensRights04/10/21 07:58 PM
1

We haven't fixed every single slight, real or perceived, from the last 250-300 years. Hold your horses. Take a number, sit down, shut up and be patient. We're still dealing with the Presentism Fallacy as relates to the more important issues of Gynocentrism and Kindercentrism. /s
/r/MensRights04/10/21 07:51 PM
1

It's challenging to ask Men to further support "Intersectionalism" when "Intersectionalism" is EXACTLY the cudgel that's used AGAINST them, daily. Nah. Do your thing. There are plenty of "Intersectionalist" groups for LGBTQ. This sub is (or should be) simply for, and about Men, of all races, colors, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, etc WITHOUT overwhelming consideration or preference for their race, color, religious affiliation, sexual orientation as a matter of belongingness.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 06:36 PM
1

True, but then the vasectomy IS an option. Unless you're a woman. Not sure. Your u_name doesn't give much insight.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 03:23 PM
41

I think they forgot a comma... Stop Interrupting Women. Stop Interrupting, Women. That second one is much more accurate. Thank an English teacher, because Punctuation matters.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 06:09 AM
3

Nah. There isn't a woman in the universe that's worth going to jail (or prison...or court)...
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:35 AM
6

Then screw older women, who are post-menstrual... Usually, after 50 - 55, they don't have any eggs left... Older ladies need orgasms too, ya' know. They don't stop being sexual beings when they stop dropping eggs. PSA - continue using condoms, even if you're post-vasectomy. Pregnancy isn't the only concern, here, fellas.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:22 AM
14

One word. Vasectomy. Then you can have all the sex you want and if she gets pregnant, you'll know she's cheating on you and you won't have to pay anything.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 01:12 AM
1

Did you happen to catch the /s, which specifically indicates sarcasm? Find a sense of humor...
/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:05 AM
1

Not a bad way to go, I suppose, if she's just trying to get drunk and not "wifed up"...She gets all her drinks for free. Not a bad gig if she's holding off on the white picket fence... /s
/r/MensRights03/10/21 03:08 AM
3

Maybe this is why the LGBTQ+ crowd has increased from 3.5% to 4.5% of the US population. Men aren't interested in women, like this one, and the women are having to resort to Lesbianism. /s
/r/MensRights03/10/21 03:03 AM
2

I think the proper term is "masculinist". Also, I agree that the hypocrisy is totally on full display. As you were...
/r/MensRights02/10/21 01:03 AM
2

Just because "toxic femininity" is disseminated in an almost imperceptible "drip, drip, drip", like a leaky faucet, where "toxic masculinity" is always represented as a "flood", society seems to think it will go unnoticed. Not so. It is noticed by many. "Toxic femininity" does, in fact, exist. And it's equally as distasteful and improper as anything a man might do, simply in a more deceptive, neurotic fashion. And it's also an important distinction to make that not all men or all women are "toxi…
/r/MensRights28/09/21 05:21 AM
2

Neither do a lot of women: headaches, claims of spousal rape, have to do their hair, etc...
/r/MensRights18/09/21 05:33 PM
9

Yes, the big lie that women are "oppressed" has resulted in many "perks" for women.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 03:24 AM
7

Ummm... Women have outpaced men in college attendance. Less than 50% of college attendees are male.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 01:56 AM
1

Wait... It's "inclusive" to exclude men? Not sure how that works. Should probably call it "exclusive".
/r/MensRights14/09/21 12:12 AM
15

Well stated.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 12:11 AM
1

I disagree. If men are not considered, in the life (or death) of their children (whether considered a "blob of cells or a sentient being), then we are not "equal" in any sense of the matter. Now, I'm not saying that abortion should be completely illegal. I simply believe that the man should have some say in the matter. Men deserve to have self-representation, personal choice, and legal protections for their "Reproductory rights" just as much as women deserve their representation, personal choice…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:50 PM
1

I guess not all Lifeboats actually look like Lifeboats... Women and children first, right?!?!
/r/MensRights06/09/21 10:42 PM
1

Fuck off, pathetic loser Douchebag. I can't help your stupidity. You can't fix stupid.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 05:34 AM
1

Who said I'm arguing against it, dumbass? Hence, the comment about weighted averages. I think it's just your dumbass interpretation that's malfunctioning here.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 04:32 AM
1

Dumbasses, like you, only give a crap about science when it suits you... When it's to your benefit. Otherwise, science is just "junk science", right?
/r/MensRights04/09/21 03:55 AM
1

Sorry if I offended your feelsies-based, non-scientific hyper-egalitarian, zero-tolerance, entrenched, agenda-based, rhetorically-informed, dumbass philosophical belief system. I have links for female ivy league economists, who know a fuck-ton more about the issue, than you, with your dumbass belief system, who've come to these exact same conclusions about the gender wage gap fallacy stated above. Your bullshit is likely informed by your mommy or your Union boss. Fuck off, lame-ass. 🖕🖕🖕🖕 Between…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 03:44 AM
1

So you say. There's at least one idiot in every village... Just found one...YOU.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 02:41 AM
1

Ummm. Women state they want it (custody), then force men into paying for it (child support + alimony), then they discover that they've bitten off more than they can chew and fail miserably (apparently, with the death of the child somewhat regularly). Usually, the reason why they want custody is either excessive vanity, "maternal instinct", or simply revenge (denial of even partial custody to the father). The court system apparently buys this bullshit wholesale. And, yes, I understand the concept…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 02:22 AM
1

Hahahahaha... How is 859 EVER more than 1,704. TWICE as many children are dead at the hands of their mothers than there are at the hands of their fathers. 1,704 > 859. Basic fucking math. 1,452,099 > 661,129. Also basic fucking math.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 01:57 AM
2

Did you mean "escape"?
/r/MensRights01/09/21 09:30 PM
2

Don't you mean Arkan-cided?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 12:50 AM
16

Femsplaining is a little shorter...Rolls off the tongue a little easier...
/r/MensRights29/08/21 01:49 PM
2

Only when I'm not watching the TV, movies or the news. Or daring to attempt Pair-bonding in the Public Square... Then the misandry almost drops to zero. There's still the matters of completing any/all tasks that are "gross, sweaty, smelly, icky", or involve spiders of any kind. That would practically (but not entirely) eliminate the misandrism...Nah, still wouldn't be gone...Just not "witnessed".
/r/MensRights24/08/21 01:24 AM
2

Slow, methodical, deeply-felt, thunderous clapping begins...👏 👏 👏. Powerfully and eloquently stated. 👍👍👍
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:17 AM
2

Use the same liberal rhetoric and philosophies, that they commonly use, right back at them. Opine that men are "not a Monolithic block and shouldn't be stereotyped" and that people who do stereotype groups are "obviously ignorant people, who are obsessed and controlled by the emotions of resentment and revenge."
/r/MensRights14/08/21 04:24 PM
5

OnlyFans is planning an IPO, so they're "cleaning up" their platform. No more porn. Sorry ladies. You'll have to rebuild your followers on Pay-treon (at least, until they decide to do their IPO). Time is short...run, run on over there before the monetization opportunities dry up.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/21 06:28 PM
0

Why does anyone care about Scarlett Johansen's problems? She's an heiress who has a bank account worth $140 million just by being born into the "right family". Then makes bazillions from the MCU franchise (either through nepotism or privilege) and gets a little upset about losing $50 million (supposedly) from Disney doing a simultaneous release of her new movie, all while telling the rest of us "how you should live". Answer? Sue Disney. Fuck Scarlett Johansen and her new movie. And she can take …
/r/MensRights11/08/21 06:17 PM
1

If a group is committed to Win/Lose, as in "For me to win, someone else must lose", then they are participating in the "toxic" variety of competition, as well as carrying resentments and/or participating in self-indulgent revenge. I don't tolerate any of these in my personal or professional life. If an individual isn't deeply committed to Win/Win, where all parties walk away somehow "bettered", feeling more meaningfully fulfilled, more knowledgeable, or, at a minimum, at least feeling acknowledg…
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/21 07:22 PM
1

Ummm... Prove it or go fuck yourself, Turd Goblin. 🙂
/r/MensRights09/08/21 02:24 AM
-2

Ummm...Yes it is. Minimum of 18 years (unless paroled for "Good Behavior"). It's a Plea Deal. What part of Plea Deal is confusing for you?
/r/MensRights09/08/21 12:55 AM
2

This seems pretty "Premeditated". Guess the lighter charge probably had something to do with her being a woman.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 12:35 AM
-1

Ummm... This was a plea deal, struck with prosecutors, to incentivize her to plead "Guilty"... That's not a "sentencing recommendation". If the judge accepts the plea deal, the deal is done. There's no "sentencing recommendation" here. Also, "life" doesn't mean "until a convict dies" in all jurisdictions. In some jurisdictions, a "Life sentence" is 35 years, since that use to be the average life span (beyond the age of 18, roughly 52 years) when these laws were enacted. Lastly, since it wasn't a…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 12:25 AM
2

Elegantly stated misandry.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 12:44 AM
3

Where do they dig up these bone-heads? I wish they'd crawl back under whatever rock they spawned from. The world would be a better place.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 12:43 AM
4

Awesome. Maybe those unbiased economists weren't wrong. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/21 08:34 PM
3

He'll eventually learn that his scars aren't as appreciated as he thinks and that he's ultimately "disposable", just waiting to be tossed aside as an aggressive "toxic male".
/r/MensRights06/08/21 09:09 PM
3

The whiny, projecting 4% need to have their very public temper tantrum. Let them have their day in the sun before reality kicks in, with a serious backlash.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 01:09 AM
0

My point is simply that facts can be opinions, since facts can be disputed. Not everyone agrees with objective facts, even. An opinion can be in perfect alignment with a fact... As in, "It is my opinion that this fact is indeed a fact. Facts are ideas that have simply gained either plural, or complete, consensus.
/r/AntiFeminists01/08/21 03:07 AM
0

Please refer to Venn Diagrams. Sometimes facts and opinions are the same thing, that ideologues just don't agree with. You can say the sky is blue and someone will inevitably reply, "No, it's azure" because they prefer the word azure over the word blue. Both are true. Both are factual. Still, someone will say "That's just YOUR opinion."
/r/AntiFeminists01/08/21 01:16 AM
1

Agreed. We need more smart humans, like you, in this society.
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/21 04:28 PM
1

I actually prefer the smaller end of the distribution when it comes to chesticles. Double FF's do nothing for me. Still, life is a series of tradeoffs, so chest size is only one consideration among hundreds or thousands when pair-bonding.
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/21 04:12 PM
2

The single apostrophe ( ' ) means feet. You missed an opportunity for hilariousness.
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/21 04:09 PM
3

I dunno...a 7' dick is likely less than .02% in the peen percentile range. "They call me tripod".
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/21 03:28 PM
1

Would this porn be "age appropriate" porn? (Sarcasm...so save your hater-ade).
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/21 12:37 AM
3

No man has to imagine. It's probably already happened to them plenty of times.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/21 07:30 PM
1

A false, corrupted version of equity, to boot.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 12:21 AM
2

Nah... The emotional retaliation isn't worth it. I'll keep my emotions to myself, unless it's so intolerable that I must say something. Hyper-neurotic people don't know how to just "accept" how someone feels without improperly personalizing it, reacting, over-reacting, or emotionally/mentally/physically retaliating. Maybe one day, when humans aren't so under-developed, or simply dumb, I'll share my thoughts and feelings freely. Until then, it'll be on an assessed/adjudicated/case-by-case basis, …
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/21 08:48 PM
3

What if "they" never ask you? "They" don't seem real big on risking rejection. I'd be interested in knowing your ratio: How many times do you ask/pay vs how many times "they" ask/pay? I'm betting it probably boils down to 100%/0% respectively (or pretty close).
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/21 12:00 AM
1

Do yourself a favor...it'll give you a chuckle (unless the humor isn't your style)...Web search his name and watch some videos. I'm completely serious and don't call me Shirley!
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/21 09:32 PM
0

I had to learn the /s the hard way... It's sarcasm, bro. Also, you failed to pick up the Leslie Nielson "Airplane!" reference. Such a bummer. I gave you a prime opportunity for a hilarious one-liner, humor destroyer...lol...
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/21 09:21 PM
0

I'm high on sarcasm. You?
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/21 07:48 PM
-1

What?!?! Gynocentrism?!?! Shirley, thou doth canteth be serious! /s
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/21 07:42 PM
2

Thank you for doing all this research and publishing it for everyone who would actually be about truth and facts-based analysis. I'm still reading but was happy to see this!
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/21 12:51 AM
1

I think it's a little ridiculous that we're making such a fuss over a segment of the population that represents between .035 & .045% (average of 4 out of every 100 US Persons). It also seems like many of these folks are "projecting" their own self-contempt on the rest of society (many of whom have NOTHING against them, but simply do not want their lifestyle forced on everyone else). Live and let live. I don't oppress anyone, but I also don't feel compelled to "help" anyone either. Their sexual p…
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/21 02:17 AM
1

Every person has repeated multiple opportunities, a new one with each new challenge, to make choices that all start with the exact same question: "Do I want to be a victor or a victim?" Seems like many of the younger folks have yet to grasp this concept. And some have already figured out, intellectually, that being a perpetual victim pays big dividends with the hyper-egalitarian, liberal set. They seem ignorant of the concept of "tough love" or they simply don't agree with it (since the dividend…
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/21 10:08 PM
12

They'll just head over to Patreon.
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/21 03:35 AM
1

Ummm...Yes it is. The same people who are hyper-egalitarian are also extremely likely to be feminist. There's probably even a Venn Diagram for it somewhere. The overlapping cross-section would have to be substantial, probably even plural.
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/21 03:11 PM
1

Largely irrelevant. Hyper-Egalitarianism is it's own extremist utopian crap-storm, just like radical feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/21 02:21 AM
2

Interesting. I'll have to do some research on that. I wasn't aware of that.
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/21 03:33 PM
7

You can just call them Incels. The term was coined by a woman whose dating life wasn't all she wanted it to be and started a community website for like-minded people. Hence, SHE was the first true Incel. It wasn't until the radical feminazi's got a hold of it that it became associated with men. Just thought you should know.
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/21 04:43 AM
2

Anger is a naturally-occurring human emotion, (sometimes even positive and useful, if it causes a person to improve themselves or their circumstances). I hope one day you allow yourself to feel it (once in a while is okay, as long as it's not allowed to devolve into fisticuffs🙂). Until then, enjoy being a robotic automaton who denies naturally-occurring human emotions. Pie-in-the-sky Flower Power for all, right?👍 Your feelings: Good My feelings: Bad Right? You're a hypocrite.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 07:10 PM
1

Me, too. Which is exactly why I tell idiots like you why and how you're an idiot. I may not always be right, but you win the gold medal for idiocy.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 05:29 PM
1

Uh-huh. Zip up your fly... you're showing your dumbass to the entire world. Gas chamber usage is rare BECAUSE it's SUPPOSE TO BE rare. It is intended to only be used for the worst offenders who've committed egregious crimes against society, persons or property. But keep showing your dumbass notions publicly so we can all see what dumbass looks like. 👍 By the way, I've grown weary of coddling idiots, so you can keep your hyper-idealized notions of civility. Idiots love to hide behind "how dare yo…
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 04:57 PM
1

It's always hilarious when they put contradictory statements in the same post. Makes it simpler for everyone else to know they're a hypocrite and a dumbass without having to do any further research. Et voila. Thank you for the Public Service. 🙂
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 03:42 PM
1

Uh-huh. Keep defending your agenda-based Red Herring-filled philosophy, so you can shut down any dissenting opinions. Swastika's aren't the average in the US. People who fly them are the tiniest of minorities and also belong to the Village Idiot club...Much like you do. 🙂
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 03:37 PM
1

Ummm...I think it's more about the intolerant response, based on the (minority) existence of toxic masculinity, which is, in all actuality toxic femininity/toxic misandrism.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 10:12 PM
3

I'm not saying that we should sink to their level. I'm observing nuance and recognizing that there are idiots on BOTH sides of the aisle, ALREADY, whether I like it or not. Idiots aren't a monolithic block, either.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/21 03:27 PM
7

Referencing the Gas Chamber is not necessarily a holocaust reference. It cracks me up when people attempt to monopolize concepts, ideas and words for their own agendas. The gas chamber has been used as a legal form of criminal punishment, issued by duly authorized Courts of Law, and carried out in prisons across the world. Stop attempting to monopolize words, concepts and phrases to shut down conversation and speech. Nice "Red Herring" attempt, though. 🙂
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/21 03:24 PM
18

You mean, kinda' like how radical feminism is just plain insulting and demeaning to men? I agree...
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/21 05:45 AM
1

Women are definitely "sausage-gazers" or "meat-gazers", on the sly, when they think no one is watching them. Age of the woman doesn't matter, either. Young and old alike. Lots of YouTube videos on this topic. Also "bank account snoopers", "collar-checkers", "drawer snoopers" and extremely proficient "Phishers". You want a really good investigator? Hire a woman. Especially if she's a mother...But most any woman will be better than most men. Asking random questions out of "left field", and violati…
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/21 02:25 AM
8

"We don't go around invading men-only spaces"...🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 OMG. If that's not a bold-faced lie, then I don't know what is. I guess one COULD make that argument now, since men aren't allowed to have men-only spaces. They were invaded years ago. Just ask the BOY-Scouts.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/21 08:36 PM
5

I dunno... Maybe don't act like a neurotic Gynocentric sociopath and then he probably won't call you a "ball and chain".
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/21 06:33 PM
1

Sooooo much hypocrisy in that sub.
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/21 06:40 PM
2

Sooooo many facts here! I'd vote for you.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/21 10:51 PM
3

As long as "volunteering" doesn't require anything "gross", "uncomfortable", "exhausting", "dangerous" or in any way involves dealing with spiders (or snakes...anything that moves that isn't furry or cute, really).
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/21 06:36 PM
3

[Removed] I'll see myself out. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/21 12:25 AM
8

I agree...The courts and the laws DO support "selfish, childish and unfair" behavior over men's rights the plurality of the time, in the name of Women and Children.
/r/AntiFeminists10/05/21 11:51 PM
2

The problem is no one knows, because it's wildly underreported. Even US CDC documents state/acknowledge that.
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/21 02:16 AM
2

Hey, some boys are raped BEFORE they're even college age, douche-nugget. Some even before they're high school age. Some before they're even "teenagers". Some even before they're out of fucking diapers. Wake up or STFU. 🙂
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/21 12:35 AM
2

Zero seems about right. The perpetual maternalistic Gynocentrism, and the sub of Kindercentrism, are both exhausting and gross. Tired of the "heartstring abuse". They play on the heartstrings so often it's like they're playing a banjo at a southern bbq.
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/21 11:29 PM
19

In 1978, women were committed to cooperation and the pursuit of realistic equality. They weren't the whiny, equity-demanding, misandrist snowflakes like so many feminists are today, so this may have been warranted.
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 10:58 PM
2

Soooo...Ugly no-talent bitches can body-shame men, but men aren't allowed to body-shame women? Got it. The hypocrisy is real.
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 04:30 AM
1

How women murder (no media suppression): https://people.com/crime/killer-moms-susan-smith-diane-downs-and-others/ Also, every abortion ever conducted. Millions. Many more, of you actually do the unbiased research, with no agenda... Just asking the questions, no matter what you "expect" to find. "The mom-of-four confessed to killing them by putting antifreeze in their drinks." Just never called "Mass Murder", because it's <4 or they're given the "benefit of the doubt".
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/21 10:14 PM
1

I disagree. You act like there's no migration ever, anywhere. Not sure where you hail from, but migration is a big deal in most developed nations, because migrants from crappy third world nations, with despotic or incompetent governments, and skyhigh birthrates, WANT the creature comforts, freedoms, relative safety (more safe than where they came from) and conveniences (aka consumerism) that developed nations provide. You also fail to address the ever-increasing, greedy addiction to extending on…
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/21 12:17 AM
1

Malthus was incorrect, but only by a couple degrees. It wasn't that the food supply wasn't scalable enough to sustain everyone. If he had taken his theory one degree further, and referenced the byproducts of human consumption and consumerism, his concerns would have been right on target. I don't care where it comes from (the "underdeveloped south" or the "developed north"), the nature of pollution is undisputed and traceable to human beings. Cows are born and bred as a source of milk, beef, and …
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/21 11:37 PM
2

would apply that logic to asking a feminists to take responsibility for all other feminists. Well, they (the feminists) opened the door and set the tone, by excluding men from any rational discussion. If men aren't "allowed" to have an opinion or tell an extremist feminist that they're an idiot, then who can? Seemingly, not you.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/21 10:14 PM
2

Breeders isn't an "attack" on any specific sex or gender. Funny that your female brain immediately jumped to conclusions about an "attack on women", despite me never mentioning any such thing. I guess that's your sexist paranoid worldview. It's actually an acknowledgement of a plural group of men and women whose proclivities run towards Kindercentrism. I don't care about women's maternal instincts. I don't care about men's paternal instincts. They're both cramming our society with unsustainable …
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/21 10:02 PM
1

Anything can be taken to an extreme...even a counterproductive or even violent extreme..."Egalitarianism" is no different. Hyper-egalitarianism is as destructive as having low or inadequate egalitarianism. If your commitment to Hyper-Egalitarianism tramples someone else's rights, due to their more moderate level of Egalitarianism, then your Hyper-egalitarianism is a destructive negative. 🙂
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/21 06:44 PM
1

Every group / community has sociopaths. The difference is men HAVE been working on dealing with the worst of EVERY community (to the degree they're "allowed"), including their own, for THOUSANDS OF YEARS and, yet, more sociopaths are born every minute. Perhaps the breeders should take a break for a decade and see if the parade of sociopaths starts a downward trend. By the way, women are far more likely to use poison instead of guns, since guns make much more of a mess and disfigure the victim. A…
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/21 04:34 PM
20

Unfortunately, that's not how that works. Extremist feminism IS Feminism. Unless and until women very publically and very vigorously reject the worst of their community, you'll all be lumped in together. Kinda like how extremist feminists treat men when they talk about them, as a monolithic block. Take it up with the feminazi's. Men have NEVER been your enemy. Now we're treated like shit and spoken about like all the evil in the universe originates with us men.. Which is epically bullshit. Women…
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/21 03:10 AM
1

Ummm...No.
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/21 03:08 PM
1

Ummm...Using global statistics is simply terrifically dumb and disingenuous. Different nations have different Governments, different laws and the citizens of these nations have no control over what happens outside their respective nations. They barely have any control over what happens inside their respective nations, let alone outside. Also, the sheer amount of money spent, by nations that do care about these tragedies, is enormous... And is paid for by all the Taxpayers (both sexes) of those n…
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/21 03:05 PM
1

Ummm...Using global statistics is simply terrifically dumb and disingenuous. Different nations have different laws and the citizens of these nations have no control over what happens outside their respective nations. They barely have any control over what happens inside their respective nations, let alone outside. Also, the sheer amount of money spent, by nations that do care about these tragedies, is enormous... And is paid for by all the Taxpayers (both sexes) of those nations, to: make these …
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/21 02:45 PM
1

Why not both?
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/21 05:57 AM
1

If it "left them speechless", they probably belong inside the lefthand door. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists13/04/21 05:45 PM
3

Not "every man you encounter"... It's actually "Every human you encounter". There are female serial killers and mass murders, too.
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/21 04:52 AM
6

Translated: Women should expect nothing less than a man crawling through burning coals for a woman who complains about having to wash a dish, or being sought for intimacy, while telling him he's the source of all the worlds problems, despite his actually washing the dish and going without intimacy, when she refuses. Nah. I'm good. Not that desperate for just any woman.
/r/AntiFeminists07/04/21 10:24 PM
3

Another example of a "good thing turning bad" because of the influence of career victims and money (the "cottage industry" is now a decentralized MegaCorp, kinda' like ISIS). Original Feminism = "good & necessary", modern Feminism = "angry and hostile" to anyone "not a Feminist". Good things can "go sour". Modern Feminism is a prime example of this.
/r/AntiFeminists07/04/21 10:16 PM
1

InCel was coined by a woman, who's pair-bonding efforts weren't successful to the level she wanted.
/r/AntiFeminists07/04/21 04:35 PM
6

Rabbit bodies, no rabbit choices. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists07/04/21 04:21 PM
1

Ignorant humans (predominantly women) think bunnies are cute and pure. All upside, no downside. Farmers, Veterinarians, men and Scientists, if they're worth their salt, know that every species of critter is a carrier for disease; Leptospirosis (rabbit and deer urine), Black Plague (Prairie Dogs), Hantavirus (rats and mice), CORONAVIRUS, hint, hint (bats), etc. Some upside, some downside. Many of these are authorized, by the state, county, and federal government (in the US), to be hunted (some sp…
/r/AntiFeminists07/04/21 04:17 PM
1

I agree that one human doesn't owe another human anything. However, Chivalry wasn't just for men. Women also had their role in Chivalry. This is rarely, if ever, spoken of. Current discussions of Chivalry only address men's roles, not women's. In times of war, the Chivalrous knight would go off to fight for his country, his family and his home. While he was away, the Chivalrous woman of the house would assume all the duties of the lord of the house. She would manage all the legal matters, being …
/r/AntiFeminists05/04/21 03:08 PM
2

Unconditional love is reserved for pets and babies.... At least, until they grow up...Then it's reserved for Pets and Women. The ones that grow up male have to prove themselves or be castoffs/throwaways.
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/21 05:29 AM
6

Women have been "wearing men down" for centuries. Now they're upset that they too are "getting worn down". Men only recently had to join the war of attrition, as proverbial combatants, out of necessity or be overrun by the Gold Medalists in the Victim Olympics. Let the Outrage Games begin!
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/21 05:03 AM
0

I said "far more", not "perfect". Reading comprehension matters. And, hey, while Cancel Culture is the stupidest thing ever, at least we're less likely to have ritual genital mutilation, murder of gays, child soldiers, honor killings, etc in the US. I mean, if you don't think that's "more egalitarian", I'm not sure what to tell you. Discussion may as well be over, since there's a fundamental disconnect between understandings.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/21 01:11 PM
0

Maybe women might want to forego embracing globalism. The US is far more egalitarian than the rest of the planet. Globalism sucks. The UN is a bunch of pontificating globalist douchebags. I said what I said.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/21 07:10 AM
3

Equal rights = Equal fights
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/21 01:51 AM
12

They only "fight for equity" when it fits the Leftist Propaganda narrative, where straight Christian white males are the height of evil (undeserving of any respect, dignity, kindness or humanity) and everyone else is a victim (of varying degrees: intersectionality) of the straight Christian white males tyrannical patriarchy. By the way, it's no longer "equality" that is supposedly desired; it's "equity" (which essentially means "Equality of Outcome", not "Equality of Opportunity").
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:55 AM
7

Psycho feminazi's are totally about revenge, which is a wildly unattractive trait in any human being of any gender.
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/21 02:16 AM
0

Oh, I'm very aware of who I am. And what's more, I'm proud of what I've accomplished. So much so, in fact, that I'm perfectly willing to defend them, as a result of self-respect, self-esteem and respect for successful people with ambition, high work-ethic, and a healthy level of risk-tolerance. 👍
/r/AntiFeminists19/03/21 01:00 AM
0

I didn't reduce you to anything. I'm perfectly aware that complex things are complex things and generally defy any attempt simplification. You made yourself small and "reduced" with your dumbass theories about the accumulation of wealth and privilege. 👍
/r/AntiFeminists19/03/21 12:50 AM
0

Yes. You reduce people's hard work, ambition, suffering, risk-taking to nothing. You reduce entire groups to monolithic blocks and denigrate them. You reduce some people to walking wallets, while you reduce others to weak, incapable children. So... Yes.
/r/AntiFeminists19/03/21 12:33 AM
1

Yeah, continue being the Graceful Loser...You'll feel super righteous and super egalitarian, but you'll still be a loser. I agree that both parties are full to the brim with dumbasses. I'm pretty done with being "civil" about it. Civility for the sake of Civility is dumb AF. I'm part of the "Silent Majority" whose becoming "not so silent" anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/21 06:10 PM
0

Uh-huh. I insult Lefties and I'm apparently the worst on Antifeminists... The one that gives it a "bad rep". You're funny. Have you read some of the other comments on here? Obviously not.
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/21 06:03 PM
1

Yuck, yuck, yuck. Har, har, har. Thanks for the comedy relief, dumbass.
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/21 06:00 PM
1

Yeah. Good for you. You're still an idiotic, reductive thief, politically, even if you "dislike modern Feminism". The feminists you claim to dislike so much are part of the Leftist "coalition of the willing victims"... The tribe of the reductionist whiner. So, you're only "mostly" a douchebag. You apparently don't know shit about shit. 🙂
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/21 03:13 PM
1

Men are a "monolithic block", so we're obviously all "identical" toxic masculinity-having potential rapists, who can only solve challenges through violence. Durrrrrrrrrrr. Fucking reductionist leftists. By the way, I've never "sworn to destroy" anything. Fix something? Make something better? Perhaps. Destroy things, nah...Lefty douchebags like to destroy things, burn things down and replace entire systems of government (from the roots up). Lefties have got "destroying things" covered. Not my clo…
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/21 02:55 PM
3

Just most of them.
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/21 05:50 AM
1

I wonder who she's trying to brainwash? Herself or the guy she's messaging? Wait...She's already brainwashed. Had to be the guy. Unless... She's just "retraining" herself...🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
/r/AntiFeminists16/03/21 12:04 AM
0

"All things being equal, the simplest explanation (kotabear2121 is YOU, and you like hOrSiEs) is usually the right one." You've just been Occam Razored, shit-smear. Go fuck yourself. 🙂👍
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/21 03:40 PM
0

You apparently don't know math or statistics, in addition to everything else you don't know (but think you do). 1.) Either you're an imposter who "borrowed" someone else's username 2.) Someone else is "borrowing" your username Or 3.) You're full of shit, like hOrSiEs and have a REALLY tough widdle life, so you want to fix it on behalf of all the non-hOrSiE people. (I suspect this one is probably the most likely, since the odds of someone using the EXACT same username would be similar odds to win…
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/21 06:16 AM
1

States have CONGRESS BUILDINGS, SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES, you dumbfuck. Damn, you're FAR stupider than I could even conceptualize. You were intellectually stunted around 5, it seems. Maybe next time specify WHICH Congress you're speaking about, fuck-stain.🙂👍
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/21 01:29 AM
0

I think I just figured it out about why you like AOC sooooo much. She's got a horse-face...She probably reminds you of your favorite ponies.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/21 06:20 PM
0

Let's not forget the 50 Governors and over 1,400 Mayors. By my calculations, that puts the total number of US Government legislators and executives at over 9,371, fuck-stain. But I'm sure you're right, that "nO oNe cOmEs fRoM lAbOr. oNlY aOc! NOboDy eLsE!" Fucking idiot.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/21 06:19 PM
0

By the way, after you finish researching the 538 in DC, you can start researching the 7,383 in all the State Houses and State Congresses, fuck-stain. I mean, you didn't forget about them, right? I'm sure you'll find plenty of people who rose from blue collar Labor, to their current positions. Choke on a bag of dicks. 👍🙂
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/21 05:42 PM
0

In order to calm down, you should probably go for a pony ride, maybe jump some hurdles, wearing some REALLY tight pants that make your voice jump up an octave or two. I bet you have those really nifty boots, too. Do you use your riding crop to "punish" your fuck-boi? Maybe you use the bit to chomp down on, when your fuck-boi uses the riding crop on you. We know you're a "special" dumbass. We just don't know "how special".
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/21 02:33 AM
0

Also you: "I'm HeLpInG". 🥴🥴🥴
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/21 06:05 PM
0

Spoken like you know me, or my history, which you don't. But keep on spewing your self-righteous virtue-signaling, hater-ade, douche-foam. You: "I'm ToLeRanT".🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/21 03:36 PM
-1

No worries. I'm fine with your disgust. And what's more...I don't really give a shit. Choke on a bag of dicks, shit-smear. 👍
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/21 04:43 AM
2

Employee-owned companies are ideal, I suspect. A great level of ownership in ones company would definitely go a long way in restoring faith in employers.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 01:07 AM
1

You're not wrong. This thought process might not be entirely right, but it's definitely not wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/21 01:03 AM
1

Well, if we do nothing, that will only become more emphasized and more indentured servitude-like. This would force the issue back the other direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 01:00 AM
1

I think there is definitely value in exploring compromises, versus 2 polarized parties just clashing horns. This would bring more people into employer-based healthcare and reduce the necessity for entitlement-based healthcare.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 12:57 AM
-1

Yeah, dude. Keep guessing wrong. Just makes you look like an ideological idiot. 🥴🥴🥴🥴
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/21 12:09 AM
0

Not a Doxx fuck-stain. No PII "published". Only publically available info anyone could easily access. Plus, I'm not a big old douchebag like you. Not my fault that you don't lock your shit down. Maybe you should use different u/names for different accounts. 👍
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/21 12:05 AM
0

👍
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/21 12:01 AM
-1

Really? Interesting. A simple websearch on kotabear2121 (pretty fucking specific u/name) returned your "hOrSiEs" as the second result. Not you? You might want to let YouTube know, fuck-stain.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 11:59 PM
1

Keep reveling in your wildly inaccurate schadenfreude wet dream, fuck-stain. I hope it sustains you all the way through to your nonexistant slacker utopia.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 06:47 PM
1

How do you keep a whiny shit-stain in suspense? I'll tell you in a couple minutes...
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 06:40 PM
0

Kotabear2121: "I lIkE DrEsSage, HuNteR / JuMpeRs and Communist Waitresses."
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 06:27 PM
1

Tough life: https://youtube.com/user/kotabear2121
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 06:23 PM
0

By the way, how are Cloud and Summer? Your "tough life" includes "hOrSiEs"?
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 06:18 PM
0

Awfully silent, you whiny little shit-nugget. Hopefully, you found your internet browser and got your pea-brain operating at 200% of maximum capability, to spell your name, recite your recently learned phone number, remember how to dial 911 and, phew, research someone other than your favorite communist waitresses with crappy attitudes about crappy ideas. Let me know when you've actually operated a Bridgeport Mill, a lathe, a surface grinder and know what the fuck a granite surface plate is used …
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 06:12 PM
1

Here's a list of a bunch of politicians who worked "labor" jobs. It evens includes your favorite communist, AOC. https://www.mic.com/articles/192462/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-barack-obama-and-10-other-politicians-who-worked-at-restaurants Just because you're a dumbass, who can't stitch 2 critical thoughts together or, apparently, use the interwebs, doesn't mean the rest of us should have to suffer your shitty little pedantic, ideological rants, doucheknuckle.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 03:56 PM
1

Donald Norcross, New Jersey's 1st Congressional District: In 1980, he served as an apprentice in the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, eventually becoming assistant business manager of the IBEW Local 351. That's with like 90 seconds and web browser. Go fuck yourself, shitty little SeaLion.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 03:45 PM
1

Let us all know when you're balls actually descend, you whiny little fucking infant.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 03:22 PM
0

Choke on a fucking bag of dicks, fuck-stain. You know nothing, infantilized child. I'm not here to provide you proof, you fucking SeaLioning shit-smear. You want answers? Go find them yourself, you lazy fuck. I'm not your research monkey, to dictate your whiny little fucking tyrannical demands to. You have an "internets" too, shitbag. Quit being a lazy, dumbass snowflake. Let me get you started - Al Franken was a comedian on Saturday Night Live. Paul Ryan worked at McDonald's and his parents con…
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 03:17 PM
0

It's probably also not any stretch of the imagination or entirely unrealistic to forecast that there will likely be an increase in male-on-male violence (despite the "equality" of women), when the "still chivalrous" white knights "defend" the "women and children first" practice against the more modern "woke" males, and/or disgruntled, disenfranchised would-have-been white knights, when they start shouldering their way onto the lifeboat, in non-compliance / defiance of the increasingly dissipatin…
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 07:13 AM
2

I bet that goes over well. In order to avoid any "Presentism Fallacy", it's important to note that it was a different time, back then, and the culture was dramatically different. In today's world, I'm afraid to say, it's probably gonna be a "freeforall" if the boats taking on water. The Captain might even throw some women and children overboard, just to get a seat in the lifeboat. Courage and Chivalry may not be universally dead yet, but (embarrassingly) they're both certainly on the operating t…
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 05:19 AM
4

No, they don't want equality, since that would mean equality of risk and equality of labor. They want equality of outcome, known as "Equity", without all the other equality of risk or labor. They want to "have their cake and eat it, too". Still "women and children" into the life rafts, first. Men are still "disposable".
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 05:07 AM
1

If you elaborate on your question, I will certainly respond.
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/21 07:26 PM
2

That's the problem. Nobody's laughing...At a comedian.
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/21 03:24 PM
0

Says the one who fails to acknowledge the most basic facts about evolution and the facts that people start somewhere and "have a past" that you're pathetic little brain seemingly can't recognize or acknowledge. There are 538 people, in DC, who know you're a pathetic little piece of shit. Also, not encouraging suicide... Just wondering how you've made it this far without a tragic accident of your own making, since you obviously don't know how to navigate this place safely, infantilized dumbass. 🙂…
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/21 03:11 PM
-1

You don't know anything about me, doucheknuckle. Keep wandering around in your tiny little echo chamber. 🙂👍
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/21 03:05 PM
0

Hey, fuck-stain, I've done more labor-intensive jobs than your dumb little mind could even potentially grasp.🙂👍
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/21 03:04 PM
1

Good thing I'm not interested in any jobs you would ever be offering, bozo. 🙂👍
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/21 03:02 PM
1

You need to reread my response. BEFORE they were doctors and lawyers, they were almost absolutely "something else" that was likely "labor"-based. No one starts life fully formed, unless your name is Benjamin Buttons. By the way, how labor-intensive is preparing a Mai Tai or carrying it from point a to point b. Phew. That's some tough labor. Almost more work than managing a Gap Store or digging a ditch, right?
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/21 12:49 AM
1

By the way, are prisoners geniuses? They kill fellow inmates using sharpened toothbrushes. Even chimpanzees can make crude tools (some for murdering other chimpanzees, in fact).
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/21 12:34 AM
3

Ever read the Darwin Awards? That's the point, genius. If anyone could do it, kotabear2121 could, likely in the weirdest way no human could possibly even imagine. Still, it's a shock that kotabear2121 has made it this far without sticking something conductive in an electrical outlet.
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/21 12:25 AM
25

Literally all of them. They weren't born into Congress, dumbass. There are doctors, lawyers, restauranteurs, actors, comedians and a crap ton of other "normal jobs" that they've worked. But they weren't always doctors, lawyers, restauranteurs, actors or comedians. Before they were doctors, lawyers, restauranteurs, actors and comedians they were young adults, with young adult jobs (I'm guessing NOT white collar jobs) Question: How has an idiot like you made it this far in life without inadvertant…
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 11:58 PM
1

How do you starve a dumbass, shit-smear of a troll? I'll tell you in a second...
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 06:10 PM
47

No need to call them Femcels. Incel was coined by a woman, who was Involuntarily Celibate and started an online community to support similarly experienced individuals. The term was then co-opted by the radical feminist set, as a cudgel to bash men. Thanks for this wonderful import from Canada: https://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-45284455?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16146730960547&amp_ct=1614673113662&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fw…
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 08:10 AM
1

Hahahahahaha. Keep dreaming and wishing, shit-smear. You'll never be a blip on my radar, fuck-stain. The best part of you ran down your mamas inner thigh, just to be wiped up with a dirty rag, by your one-pump chump father, who left the rent money on your mamas dresser. 🙂👍🖕
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 03:56 AM
1

Hahahahahahaha. You're not even a blip on the radar, shit-smear. 🙂👍
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 03:41 AM
1

Hahahahahaha. Wow, you take retarded to even more incredibly new levels of depravity and stupidity. Go find another sub to play "rhetorical retard" in. You're running out of lame insults and they weren't even great to begin with. Take the rest of "the rest of us" (obviously you) with you. 🖕
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 03:21 AM
1

Yeah. I dunno why I argue with retarded iDeOloGuEs, unrepentant idiots, and dilettante, self-possessed, righteous, arrogant man-children, like you. I guess it's a character flaw.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 03:08 AM
1

Ummm... Your the only one talking, fuck-stain. So... Who's the "none of us" you're referring to? You? Couldn't give 2 shits what you believe or don't believe, shit-smear. 🙂👍
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 02:55 AM
1

I got and gave an orgasm, with/to one of those people called "women", last Saturday night. When was the last time you saw a vagina? I bet it was when you were popping out of your mommies pussy. You do know what women are, right?
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 02:49 AM
1

Ummm. Why would I give you credit for being wrong? Thanks for trying, though. It was hilarious how stupid you made yourself look. Total Self-own. 🙂👍
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 02:16 AM
1

Hahahahaha. You're funny as hell. Still REALLY retarded, but funny as hell. You need A LOT more free-riding University to get your dumbass even remotely adjacent to "intelligent".
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 02:10 AM
2

Hahahaha. You know nothing about me, fuck-stain. Show me your PhD in Psychology or stfu. Don't presume to know anything about me. 🙂👍
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 02:01 AM
2

Not threatened by women, but not gonna be a Door Mat like you're ready to be. Maybe Themyscira looks like a great place, to you, but I'm perfectly happy earning my own way through life, unimpeded by free-riding slacker douchebag snowflakes like you.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 12:50 AM
2

No worries, child...ahem...I mean, Algebra child. Pretty apt screen-name, douchenugget. Let us know when you successfully make it to Trigonometry. I'm not holding my breath, since you can't seem to respect your mommies credit card or understand basic logic, but I am rooting for you to make that giant leap, child. The rest of us are all waiting for you at the finish line, while you're stumbling into other people's lanes and tripping up strangers, without any seeming apology for your stupidity. Bu…
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/21 12:18 AM
2

That's cool. Your general attitude reeks of magnanimous 12 year old, using mommies credit card, without her knowledge, to buy all your friends the latest gaming platforms, running the card up to its max, and then gets shocked when mommy actually has the temerity to get mad and punish you by sending you to your room. When you're making a six figure income, own your own home, and know what a Mill Levy is, please come back and offer your opinion. Until then, I don't really give a crap about your wh…
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/21 09:17 PM
3

Nope. I have no desire to work in the Dental Industry. And I don't care whether you believe me or not. I still make a six figure salary and still own a home. What about you, Pink Pussy Helmet? You're probably 25 and live in your parents basement, eating all the food from the cabinets and hoping mommy will go grocery shopping again, just to keep you from running out of Pop Tarts. I bet you're the wannabe dental assistant, since it'd probably be a hundred-fold improvement in your income and allow …
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/21 06:48 PM
3

I have a six figure salary in a career path far better than yours, I bet, douche-stain. I am a homeowner, dumbass. May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your Pink Pussy Hat-wearing dumbass head. Sorry if I interrupted your Gynocentric wet dream. 🙂
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/21 06:12 PM
3

You're funny as hell. Retarded, but still funny as hell. I go to a local Dental office...All female. I go to another Dental office... All female. I go to a Dermatologists office...All female. All white coats, earning more than your average male ditch digger. Go pound sand with your stupid ideological, fee-fees based Logical Fallacies. Dumbass. Explain your dumb ideology to biological female athletes and the Boy Scouts (who are no longer just boys). Men can't have a single thing for themselves, w…
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/21 08:21 AM
2

In my best retarded female imitation voice, "YOU OWE ME!".
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/21 02:02 AM
3

I keep UpVoting these threads, in the hopes that maybe people will notice how dumb these idiots are. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be an end to the line of idiots anywhere in sight. If this retard, Evan, would simply end his dumb idea with "...for me", I'd be good with it. However, he presents his idea as "universal", which makes me think he's stupid or arrogant (likely both, simultaneously).
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/21 01:59 AM
1

Perfect.
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/21 02:06 AM
4

Unless you wear a Pink Pussy Helmet, and continue the "fee fees"-based Logical Fallacy of making excuses for women, because they're supposedly the "fairer sex", there is actually a name for such women, with such behavior...Responsible adult human beings recognize that "she" is a Predatory Predator, who predatorily preys on prey.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/21 09:00 AM
16

Female.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/21 06:28 AM
3

Calling a man a dog is "Specieist". 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/21 06:12 AM
2

Just a few...a snippet...of the female predators and rapists: Aileen Wournos Ghislaine Maxwell Mary Kay Letourneau ---------------------2018------------- Elizabeth Flint Brittany Zamora Dawn Diimmler Kayla Sprinkles Maren Oates Haley Reed Miranda Pauley Cassandra White Hunter Day Loryn Barclay Stephanie Peterson Shawnetta Reece Tracy Miller Nataly Lopez Lindsey Jarvis Tiffany Geliga Elizabeth Heaton Taylor Taylor Boncal Alina Leung Sarah Madden Fowlkes Camryn Zelinger Mallory Christ Alexandria V…
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/21 03:12 AM
4

I hope that was sarcasm. 🥴🥴🥴
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/21 07:55 PM
1

SOME don't hate men. SOME DO hate men. As the lefties are so apt to chant, like mindless robots, they're not a monolithic block.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/21 07:53 PM
3

Only until she gets together with a couple million of her closest misandrist genocidal douchebag friends and allies. Then they become an organized "movement", who wears Pink Pussy Hats to denote their affiliation. There's the potential for 160 million, potentially genocidal, "feminists", even before we start considering their "allies".
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/21 03:10 AM
1

InCel was actually created/coined by a woman to describe her (and other womens) Involuntary Celibacy. Not sure when it became all about men....🤔🤔🤔
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/21 08:23 AM
22

Not surprising, in the least bit.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 10:05 PM
6

Uh-huh... It's true. 1 out of every 30,000 US persons agree... Or 1 out of every 15,000 US women, by my calculations.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/21 05:10 AM
1

That's why I said, "The plurality of modern women", as in not all but most and of more modern, less traditional mindsets.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/21 06:35 PM
21

UpVoted so everyone can see how stupid this thought pattern / hypocrisy is. Unfortunately, not everyone will recognize the stupidity of it.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/21 03:01 AM
3

Ummm... Scientists are creating artificial sperm, supposedly to help infertile men be able to father children. I'm sure KAM will find some "unintended consequences" to foster rather dramatically. Human males have been rendered "unnecessary"and even more disposable than ever before, since sperm can now be produced in a Petri dish. We're all one step closer, willing or not, to Wonderwoman's Gynocentric island of Themyscira. https://youtu.be/RoHvNrSj3sE
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/21 09:23 PM
1

Ummm... Scientists are creating artificial sperm, supposedly to help infertile men be able to father children. I'm sure KAM will find some "unintended consequences" to foster rather dramatically. https://youtu.be/RoHvNrSj3sE
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/21 08:38 PM
3

And ditches... Very few women digging ditches, handling electricity or fixing the crapper pipes (omg...eww, right!?!?).
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/21 02:13 AM
2

The human imperative to Pair Bond, and subsequently procreate, is instinctual, primal and resides in the oldest part of our brains, known in science as the "Lizard Brain" or the "Reptilian Brain". It's not that they don't know... It's that they haven't learned how to overcome this instinct. Fortunately, modern feminists are giving that 70% a crash course via the space and insight necessary to function without women, as evidenced by the rise of Red Pillers and MGTOW. Both men and women eventually…
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/21 12:19 AM
2

Not to be confused with FOBUDABTI (Fear Of Being Unwillingly Dragged Along By The Idiots) which is similar, but still unique and different.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/21 08:37 PM
3

Depending on the actual circumstances of the laws, usually both are bad. The question becomes which one is "worse" or, at least, the absolute minimum "least worst". Although, it's unlikely that anyone empirically "knows" the outcomes, in advance, there are reasonable "educated guesses", based on prior enactments of similar laws, though. It's the old cliche, "Those who pay no attention to history are doomed to repeat it." Unfortunately, they're dragging everyone else along for the ride. It's FOBU…
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/21 04:48 PM
6

Laughs uproariously in the key of "Unintended Consequences"...🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/21 09:33 PM
6

Marriage rates and childbirth rates are trending downwards in the US, as well. Probably Canada, too.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/21 09:25 PM
10

Something tells me, it ain't just Denmark. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/21 09:20 PM
3

Ummm... Don't really care what industry you're in. Just proves that d-bags come in all shapes and sizes.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/21 04:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter