TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TOGTFO Archive

View 3 posts and 188 comments by TOGTFO on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I'd bet a lot are from wealthy families, go to uni, have nice cars and can afford to pull this shit. The wage slaves who are having to work and might be fired because of these fuckers, are getting kicked in the metaphorical nuts by this shit as they just want food on the table and a roof over their head. I'd bet these women have never, ever had to worry about where they would sleep and if they could afford food.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/19 01:22 AM
1

Probably untreated postpartum depression and I should stress that doesn't excuse her actions, as she still knew what she was doing was wrong, it can give a contributing reason why she did it. In cases like this I really think they should offer her the option of a reduction in sentence by having a hysterectomy, or sterilising her in a non-reversible way. Then she can't have kids and will not be killing (or trying to) any more kids.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/19 09:53 PM
2

No, she gives the ring back and he gets it. If she was ordered to give the $12.5K back (I'm unsure f the amount they cover) they would cover the amount, or up to their limit of what they do. The person who loses however, gets free flights, hotel room so basically a mini-free holiday without having to pay the judgement added into it.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/18 09:27 PM
2

Who is also the mother of Kate Fischer and unfortunately after dating James Packer, almost all her nudes photos disappeared (Kate's), but she was in Sirens (1993 movie) with Elle McPherson and Portia De-Rossi who all get very nude.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 08:46 PM
1

But you have a person in a position of trust and power over the kid and they shouldn't be allowed to abuse that in any way. Fuck them when they're not your students, but not while you are actively giving them grades.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/15 10:56 AM
2

Karl.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 10:47 PM
4

You realise this won't happen. Imagine if George R.Martin's final novel or a new one comes out. Or Brandon Sanderson, or one of the other many, highly popular novels done by men is released. A shitload of agents for writers are actually women and there is probably more women writers in magazines than men. Because in my experience men and women can both work on men's titles, but generally only women work on their own gender's magazines. I used to submit to women's mags under a sudonym with a woma…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 09:39 PM
2

They issued a full retraction which is on their front page. But leaving up their previous accusations might be a tactic, so people can't whitewash what they did and said. Because we know how this goes. They'll start saying they didn't say what they said. That he wasn't directly accused and they only alluded to things. So by keeping their statements up it means that their full lies are visible and there is no hiding from what they said. The idiot supporters who probably demand people use jazz han…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:15 PM
–

The case has been settled and they are part of the settlement I'm fairly certain. This is one of his lawyers, who gleefully posted the link to the women's website. EDIT: For shits and giggles I added the official document for the suit that was filed.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:46 AM
1

If you remember what happened to the woman who made that shitty Depression Quest, she'll say she got rape and death threats and people will rally to her. She has been filmed giving lectures saying she isn't a gamer, doesn't like gaming and talking about it as a puerile activity. Then with the shutting down a female run Fine Young Capitalists when they were trying to set up an event, then asking for money to an identical event and not putting it on. Then there's the stealing other people's gamepl…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:30 PM
1

Depending on the uni they might have had a specific lab there which does DNA testing. Some schools have super computers, some have state of the art research laboratories and access to all the equipment needed. I dare say if they had everything there the only barrier would be asking. As I've got a friend who's a bio-molecular chemist and would test shit from his apartment for idle curiosity while studying. If I ever needed anything tested I can always get him to run stuff for me.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:08 PM
2

If they have their own lab it's not nearly as expensive and probably a good learning tool.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:01 PM
51

Plus being a slap it's more insulting and demeaning than damaging. A slap is your way of saying to someone you don't view them as a threat, yet want to show them you can and will hurt them if needed. It's like spitting in someone's face, but with that awesome underlying threat of violence to stop them from thinking they can do it back without retribution.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/15 09:26 PM
2

She got a pussy pass on the sexual assault lies.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/15 05:00 AM
–

Because that would be admitting the department made a mistake and while the father was seeking custody, they were actively stopping him even though the mother was responsible for the shocking state of the girl's life. It's the thinking that you're only guilty if you admit you are and to keep that stance they had to deny him custody - even though it seems the mother didn't want her. They seemed to take that the daughter not wanting to live with a father, as he wouldn't approve of her turning tric…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:18 AM
–

This is the Australian Family Court system in a nutshell. A mother gets her daughter and turns her from being a good student to a severe drug addict prostituting herself at 16 to score drugs, yet they try and return her to the woman. The fact that he has another daughter (the girls half sister) who he "raised successfully" and yet they still wanted to give the girl back to the woman who gave her pot at 12 and then got her on ice (meth). People don't believe me when I tell them this shit happens …
/r/MensRights02/01/15 10:43 PM
2

The best bit is the last bit which says she will be charged 6% per annum on the amount. So this isn't something she can ignore and hope it goes away, it will continue to increase unless she pays it out in full.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 10:24 PM
1

So where a case worker who is usually very biased towards women, plus the doctor, who both say the woman will not change and as soon as she can, will go back to alienating the daughter from her father, you think she should be given back parenting power/responsibility? The woman has robbed the man of a significant amount of the child's life. The woman has emotionally abused her daughter to the point she had an emotional breakdown. did you not read this: As soon as the eye of the court is removed …
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:37 PM
–

So an emotionally abusive mother, who will cause years of psychological trauma to a kid and will take many more to fix, needs to be kept in a kids life? The point is to make sure the parent who is prone to abuse their kid is monitored, has limited contact and no way to use the child as a tool to manipulate their ex. If it was feasible I'd say the woman is only allowed monitored access to the child until she takes a bunch of classes on parenting, anger management and probably about ten other thin…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:33 AM
–

The doctor and report both agreed there should be a period of no visitation with the mother to allow the father to rebuild the bond the mother thoroughly destroyed. The mother essentially did that to the father - nine months without visitation because of an incident she all but admits she made up. Let the mother have maybe two days a fortnight with the daughter sleeping over after a month, then slowly increase that. The fact is in Australia it won't happen. The repeated court order violations ha…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:39 AM
–

He has to consult her on those and get permission for everything else. So no holidays for him, if she gets a haircut expect the mother to have a fit, and many other things. Notwithstanding Order 2 herein, in exercising sole parental responsibility in relation to X’s health and education, the father must: consult the mother in relation to any decision to be made about the relevant issue (such consultation to be in writing); make a genuine effort to come to a joint decision about the issue; and in…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:24 AM
4

It is the mother’s evidence that she did so in order to assist X to go with the father as X was distressed and she thought “it was the right thing to do”. When challenged as to how she could possibly know X was distressed given she was at no time contacted by the school to be advised that X was showing signs of distress, the mother was unable to answer. It was put to the mother in cross-examination that the reason she was attending the school when the father was due to collect X was to sabotage …
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:53 AM
–

If you want the mother's side (which still looks really bad even through her rose coloured glasses): The Mother The mother relies on her affidavit sworn 26 July 2014. The mother also gave vive voce evidence at the final hearing of this matter. It is the mother’s evidence that she believes that a continuation of the current arrangements are in X’s best interests as they are working well for X. It is the mother’s evidence that she has now come to the realisation that it is important that X have a …
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:53 AM
–

Meh. I live in Australia and our family courts are outrageously biased towards mothers. If you read it the woman repeated violated courts orders, alienated the girl from her father, had her mother or sisters be at the school to cause trouble every time he picked her up and the icing on the cake was stopping the father from seeing her for 9 months. Prior to the breakdown of X’s time with the father in 2013 there were difficulties with X going with the father when he arrived to collect X from scho…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:37 AM
0

Well, that may be true and generally the people you love the most are the ones you can hate the most. But my missus is due to get a pretty huge inheritance, and her parents have made it clear if we have kids and divorce, she gets nothing and it all goes to the kids. The way I see most people worrying about divorce is money and revenge. Usually using the kids and money as a way to get revenge. But really, a lot of people who marry are idiots grasping at some fairrytale they think will somehow tra…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:41 AM
0

Simple, she wanted it and I see myself with her for the conceivable future and it was expected from both families. I couldn't give a shit and I'm not jaded about women, so I thought "why not?" Though, in my position, she earns a shitload of money, so is independantly wealthy, while I have put more equity into my house, she dumped her savings into it and has a vast inheritance coming to her. Really, we're both educated, have good jobs and know mutually assured desturction would happen if either p…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:56 AM
10

I think it's because this woman turned up for a blind date, counting on a free meal and night out, decided to bring two friends along on the gravy train, then freaked out when he split. The menu looks like everything is pretty cheap, but doesn't list drink prices, so it could be they sat down ordered the most expensive shit on the menu and he decided to split. Sex is like other agreements, especially like this, as it's a fluid situation where at any time he is allowed to change his mind. You can…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 03:49 AM
2

Which is why they should have a tag system, for both users under a month old and trolls. It makes it very easy to show that established commenters here are not idiots (well most of them).
/r/MensRights09/04/12 01:55 AM
8

Because people are stupid. They purposely try to aggravate people in MR and people here are only too happy to become enraged by them. Plus they've got pretty good at the baiting, they had a nifty one of posting something, then re-writing the post to make it look like everyone commenting was incredibly intolerant/bigoted/mysoginistic. It's hard, but I've learnt to just shake my head and pretend that any of the more outrageous things on here are from them. As they usually are.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:23 PM
21

She doesn't recant - in fact she continues to say it is about a rapists and then says she refuses to speak any more about it. Then in lower posts says that the guy is too defensive. I like how a guy can be too defensive when being labelled a rapist sympathiser. Is there a sweet balance point of not caring too much, but just enough if someone calls rapist mysoginist on you? The whole thing has her reposting people feeling sorry for her, as you know, even though he has a well known comic and she's…
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:25 AM
1

Sadly, most here will not agree with you on that. Personally I think it has to do with raging testoserone. The amount of times I've told myself I'd withhold sex from my wife as I was pissed with her, then just magically leaves my mind once she starts coming on to me. My wife on the other hand can shut up shop quite effectively if she's pissed with me. No matter how much people want it to be equal, sexual relationships always have disparity, and between a man and woman, the woman usually withhold…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 07:57 PM
1

This isn't about feminism, it's about the state government making money out of child support and being ineffectively run. They do not have money to spare, I believe that Washington is making an amendmant to the law, that will allow wrongly convicted people to claim from the state (the base rate is 50k a year, but more if on death row), but that comes into effect in 2014 as they don't have the money yet. Your prison system has been turned into a private workforce where they can pay the workers as…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 07:36 AM
9

You have now provided all the SRS community and everyone else a glorious example of misogyny at its finest, with the comments here. Seriously, the woman is obviously a gold digger (prostitute without morals), but linking to things like this just get the community out in a rage on women. I think the best one was Jody Claman who actually calls them all out (except for the one who's donating her proceeds to charity) and says they aren't sefl made or legitimately wealthy (as in their wealth is someo…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:07 PM
14

Actually they do and it's what causes them a great deal of shame and doubt. The fact that they have an orgasm will make them question whther they liked it or not and generally cause them a shitload of long term psychological and sexual dysfunction. That's why saying that if a man has an erection while being raped means he has consented is so fucked up. Rape not matter what the sex of the victim or perpetrator can result in the victim becoming unwillingly aroused. This doesn't mean they enjoy it,…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 02:53 AM
10

Agreed, but as the article states, this is a slap in the face of family courts, basically saying they cannot or will not police this sort of stuff so someone else is going to handle it. If you go to court and have a conviction against your spouse who has accused you of abuse and proven to have done so falsely, then the judge is going to look blatantly silly if he uses that claim in his/her findings. A lot of judges are sitting in ivory towers and I dare say in the family courts, they would have …
/r/MensRights14/03/12 07:05 PM
2

Yup, blood tests every six months for everything and I DO NOT have any types. One of the main reasons I don't share drinks or lend water bottles. The thing is people who have a disease which doesn't bother them see no real harm in if they accidentally pass it along. This is fucking wrong. It's just like warts, a lot of people have them but I don't. So if someone thinks having HVPD is no big deal, they will never tell someone untilk it's too late. Every relationship I've been in we've gone to the…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 08:18 PM
10

I don't understand how a grown man sucking a babies dick can be anything other than dodgy. The fact that one who obviously has herpes is continuing to cut adn blow babies is just mind boggling.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 02:30 AM
7

He didn't even mention her and if it were a defamation trial, he would've skated. It was all innuendo and never stated he was talking about her (everyone would know he is), but the blantant disregard for reason and a non-biased position the judge is meant to hold, just beggars belief. I seriously wonder what is happening when judges can act this way. I'm in Australia and they always buttfuck fathers in court here, but even they wouldn't allow this shit to go on.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:22 AM
1

Thanks for the support, not that it means much to those reading. I really wish people would look at these things more logically. The easiest thing to do in life is to blame someone else. The hardest is to make sure no one can blame you.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 07:59 AM
2

You see everything you say is justified. Men need more birth control. If the pharmaceutical industry spent a fraction on what it did on erectile dysfunction on male birth control, we might not be having this conversation. Over the years I have heard multiple times of trials for men's contraceptives, but honestly I do not think it will happen any time soon. It's far too easy for men to rely on women to cover that side of things. Birth control costs money, can have side affects, can interact with …
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:20 PM
2

If you;re in a relationship, simple things like becoming sick can render the pill ineffective, even drugs or alcohol. So there is a vastly reduced chance that she will produce eggs that your sperm can fertilise. If you girlfriend did that too you, I would whole heartedly agree with you she was an evil bitch. You would be fully justified in your anger. No argument here on that. As for condoning this behaviour, far from it. I deplore it. It's iiresponsible on a level I wouldn't ever imagine myself…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:10 PM
1

Well then this is definitely a problem that should be tackled. I've found that doctors say the same thing to women who want their tubes tied too. I too find it disturbing that they think you're able to make the life long and drastically altering choice of ahving a kid, but that to have an operation that can be life long is not something you have the cognitive ability to fully comprehend until you're older.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:04 PM
0

Well the subject can be debated that men give their consent when they have sex, as it is the act of procreation. However, I do think it is something that should be raised and dealt with. Men should have reproductive rights that go past ejaculation. While we cannot and should not control the reproductive rights of a woman, if our sperm is used for fertilisation and produces a child, men should not be obligated to be financially responsible for the child, if they have stated from the outset that t…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 07:18 PM
1

Ok, lets talk about stats. Where was the survey done? What was the size of the survey pool? What was the average income of the respondents? Were the reposndents divroced, married, single, or in a defacto relationship? What was their sexual orientation? When was the survey done? Were the people who conducted the interviews/surveys qualified? Who comissioned the survey? You see, most surveys are done with an agenda. Usually for marketing, but also academic nd then for political reasons. With these…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 07:08 PM
4

So you're asserting that most women do conceive children through clandestine ways? I whole heartedly agree some women do lie, cheat and manipulate, but on the whole these traits aren't predominant. Just like some men are rapists, but some extremeists choose to label us all as such, I think it's equally moronic to assume all women are secretly planning to steal your sperm to have your kids. If you want a good article look up the woman from the UK press (I think it was in the Guardian) where she f…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 01:24 AM
3

Look, while it's morally reprehensible for someone to try and conceive a child with you, whilst keeping you unaware, it's something you have to realise is a possibility. Most women aren't going to engage in this activity, but generally the few who do would exhibit all the warning signs that would lead to you being extra careful when having sex. It might encourage men to be more active in the birth control methods, instead of just hoping she is doing everything. I've dated women in their 30s who …
/r/MensRights19/02/12 12:19 AM
5

I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 07:26 AM
2

Yes they do, they play the durms and chant as he goes through the ritual. There's no way they'd let him take the helm unless they saw him eat it with their own eyes.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:10 AM
6

It's a Twilight for women over 30.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:26 AM
1

I bet the kid wished he'd used one.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:41 AM
3

I may enable my missus, but then you don't have to worry about that as I don't see myself ever breaking up with her. She has earned the right with me to act irrationally from time to time and to do things I wouldn't forgive in others. I hope some day you have a relationship with someone other than family who doesn't obey you like you're a drill seargent.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:13 PM
2

Yes, I agree she was being a dick. My point is, all women I've dated do this shit. So through my personal experience I've deduced, I can either date a woman who has no self esteem or confidence, who will blindly do what I tell her, or I have to put up with irrational behaviour every now and then. OR I could go gay. Or sit at home and masturbate to the internet, while getting incredibly angry at any perceived slights I see there. But no, I put up with a little shit and have a best friend who will…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:38 PM
6

Sorry, but if you're out on a date with your girlfriend and you have an argument about lending her your shoes, it's a dick move to storm off home in a hissy fit because she said you weren't a gentleman. Personally I've been in the sort of situation where my missus had very high heels on and we'd been to a dinner in the city and her feet were killing her. I know they're stupid things, but they make her feel sexy and so I bite my tongue when I think about how stupid they are. If she was so insiste…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:05 AM
0

Well, to expand on my reasoning for a victim not being named, there are a hundred arguments as to why it is just revictimising the person - friends of the convicted taking revenge, having people know what has happend to them (some shit you'd like to keep private), general nutjobs becoming fixated on the case. Here's an example of why I think there should be some shielding, and it is to do with a case that happened in Australia: There was a group of middle eastern blokes some teens (under 18) and…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:49 PM
1

Hey I agree with your whole heartedly, but I believe they should keep everything anonymous until after the court proceedings. This harms no one, except for the fruit cakes who claim that the general public is at risk (which if they were the judge could impose bail enough to ensure it's minimised). If you wait until a case has been tried, then you remove a lot of the negative things that can happen with a case. Those found innocent do not have to go for months of people speculating on whether or …
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:37 PM
6

It's your girlfriend. If you enjoy morning head and a bunch of other nice things she can do for you, then do some niice stuff for her. While it's bullshit that women use the accusation of not being a gnetleman every time a guy doesn't perform some act of gallantry, doesn't mean being a dick is ok. I would've let her had my shoes, but unless she was bigfoot, they would've been as useful to her as flippers. Better to carry her and not ruin a night that involved her getting so dressed up in 3 inch …
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:40 PM
-1

I reckon you're a troll - it's just the sort of thing MR has been saying shouldn't be done, yet we have a case here that MR would love to point at as an example of women being brutal. But I do agree that they shouldn't be named. All the facts aren't out and if you wait until the trial is over, then you can have a full and frank account of what happened, the repercussions and fallout. Also if there are any innocent they can be spared the tar and feather treatment. As for naming teenage offenders,…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:13 AM
3

Still, the people shouldn't be named before it is tried. Potential jurors would have seen this report and formed the opinion on their guilt already. Personally I think OP is a troll, knowing that the guys in here would be whooping at the role reversale and having a case of female brutality to point at, while saying it's a disgrace that the offender shouldn't be named. But I do agree that they shouldn't be named, especially if they're underage - more so because it seems like the 24-year-old was t…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:08 AM
0

Sorry, but normal people don't get out pliers to work on a retarded kid when he doesn't want sex. It doesn't matter what sex they are, people who fuck retards should be punished as if they were fucking children - as they often have the mental age of a child. Frankly there are way too many stories about women molesting teens and getting away with it. This means that people do not think of it as bad as they would if the genders were reversed. So the community needs some harsh sentences to come out…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:37 AM
4

She could have agreed to a adjustment in the support he was paying. I presume he would've applied to the court for an adjustment, but all she'd need to do is say he's hiding income or that she cannot survive at a lower payment and depending on the judge they'd allow the support to continue at the established rate. Then if he can't pay he goes to jail. Which is lucky, as the prison system has become the backbone of the manufacturing industry. As why buy stuff from China or Mexico, when you can ma…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 05:48 AM
1

What I find most disagreeable is the whole premise of her book is that women are paid less than men. Any decent research into this phenomenon can tell you that the research can be skewed very easily. The reason? Because they do not take maternity leave out. Most women receive a wage while on maternity leave and usually it is significantly less than their working wage. Take the fact that most women take 3 months maternirty leave (a large percentage six) would explain in an instant the fact she pr…
/r/MensRights31/01/12 08:37 PM
2

Do you then rub your hands together and say "Goood....very goood!" ina creepy voice while licking your lips?
/r/MensRights29/01/12 08:03 AM
0

So what? Women are more marketable and having boys talking about how a dog helps rehabilitate them after sexual assualt wouldn't get as much support. The fact that they do provide services to both sexes is what matters.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:44 AM
11

They get cheap labour. Didn't you know that American prisons are now have manufactoring businesses that undercut Mexicans, as even they can't get away with paying someone under 30 cents an hour. It's endentured servitude. The private prisons get paid by the government to house crims, they support the local law enforecement and lobby groups to make sure laws aren't passed that would reduce the amount of workers they get. Then they get to put those "criminals" to work for I believe it's 25 cents a…
/r/MensRights22/01/12 11:46 PM
1

Yeah, it's a tricky one though. The problem is the fucking idiots who are running the register and all the people in the justice system have turned it from being a useful tool to a online version of the sandwich board of shame. It's no longer there to warn people, but to publicly humiliate the people on it. I don't have stats but I dare say probably 90% of the people on it shouldn't be. A while ago I read a story about a guy, who is on the register, because he slept with his wife (she wasn't at …
/r/MensRights21/01/12 04:13 AM
1

I'm not disagreeing with you in any way. But women's rights groups would have a field day if you tried to make a registry of women who filed false rape claims. They would refer to it as a rape register and say women who are raped now had to worry about being put on a register if they couldn't prove they were raped. Then that would open them up to other predators. I'm with you all the way, but you have to be practical. It will never happen if you demand it be public. A ompromise might be a nation…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 03:28 AM
1

No way would they be made public. You gotta settle for the concession of having them known to the law enforecement. If a case against you did come up this should enable you to use this to question her credibility. But to clarify why it cannot be made public is that women's rights groups would say it's a registry of women that men would be free to rape. Have it as a criminal conviction that they have to disclose to employers, but not freely avaliable to the public. While I think the name and sham…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 02:42 AM
1

So you are absolving these accusers of personal responsiblity? Just because the police "pressured" them into it, you think they should be absolved of picking out someone who was close enough? While you are right the cops do use those methods and need to have more stringent controls in place, as they just want to clear cases to make their stats look better. It does not absolve someone who's angry and wants someone punished from picking the wrong person. There needs to be serious consequences when…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 02:16 AM
2

I'm with you there. The way I look at it is like this, if I faked my death, then went into hiding to have my girlfriend/partner/business associate jailed, then was caught they would lock me up. The only difference in the two is that crimes for murder can be harsher, but accusations of rape require continued lying and actively ensuing that the person is jailed. So in my opinion, framing someone for your muder, is far less sinister than accusing someone of raping you. With the rape accusation you …
/r/MensRights21/01/12 01:58 AM
10

What I think everyone here has failed to latch onto is that she claims that it fails to dicuss all sides. If she is of that opinion, then it's only just to say that when talking about rape, they should talk about people falsely accussed, the actual rapists, and the victims. But as we all know this is something that would never happen as they would claim it wasn't appropriate to talk about something they don't want to hear. You'll get the usual catch phrases about triggers, mansplaining and that …
/r/MensRights20/01/12 08:48 PM
8

You're meant to, but the ships officers abandoned their duties on this one. The captain jumped ship and they ended up with waiters and dancers ordering people on how to abandon the ship. Everyone who works on a ship has to be drilled thoroughly on how to handle things in the case of evacuation, in case the people above them die (or in this case abandon their duties). Though I did read the ships purser stayed on board and broke his leg making sure everyone got off, so good on him.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:42 PM
5

I doubt they do and I wouldn't be sure if the ex-wife does either. From the way it looks, she's had to file for support while he's in prison and maybe it all happens automatically from there. It'd be on the books with the government, so as soon as an employer lodges his social security number, they'd be notified to remove the money. I could be wrong, but even the most heartless woman would think twice about making this guy pay. It could be that she owes the goverment the money and so she has to …
/r/MensRights15/01/12 08:40 AM
4

The rape victim defamed him. Courts calculate damages for defamation by how adversly the false statement affects the person. Her false statement cost him 17 years of his life. Her false statement made him loose a possible 17 years worth of income. Her false statement caused him to never see his children growing up. Like it or not, victim or not, defaming someone is an actionable offence. It doesn't matter what your motives were, it all depends on the damage that you have caused the person who yo…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 03:01 AM
21

Admittedly the state has forgiven their part of the debt, but now he owes the mother of his kids money. I really can't fathom how a situation like this can exist. The state took his life away, denied himself the ability to advance in a career and effectively made him unemployable for anything but the most menial jobs. But because they have budget worries, they're not going to pay him. How about they put the proceeds from crime they seize into a fund for people like this. Then it's not coming out…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 01:54 AM
36

He was also hit with a $110k bill for child support once released.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 01:34 AM
4

Plain and simple it's defamation, which ended up with him having no career, no savings, no support system at all. While I sympathise with her, the fact that she picked him out so she would have someone to blame makes her responsible for the key evidence that put him away. What do you think is appropriate to happen? His life was ruined and he spent 17 years locked in a cage, all because she wanted to have someone to blame. If she's well off, she can at least pay him back as he's now in debt for c…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 01:33 AM
1

You still didn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 05:53 AM
1

Please explain how I pedastalize pussy? I'm very curious.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 05:15 AM
1

I know what his post was I was responding to your vitriol. Let me guess, your woman costa couple of grand from a place called Realdoll? As for my missus, the only downside of her is she spends shit on designer gears. She is educated, intelligent, confident, good looking and works her arse off. I'm the same. The fact that she wouldn't date someone who worked in a supermarket isn't something I'd hold against her. It's the dirve, intelligence and commitment that having a good job requires, that wom…
/r/MensRights11/01/12 05:06 AM
2

She's in Australia (which I am too) and can apply for Austudy to pay for her education if she has no contact with her father. I find it mind boggling he has to pay her a cent. When I left school, my parents had plenty of money, but told me I had to get a job while at uni as they weren't going to pay for my beer. There is no reason he should be paying for her, there are multiple options open to her to get support from the government, which would be reduced if she received income from him. It seem…
/r/MensRights11/01/12 04:55 AM
1

Nice to see I upset you enough to had to creep and read through all my previous posts. You see, people with anger in themselves like you, seem to exude that around people. You see, women do not generally like angry men who thnk that 99 out of a 100 women are shit. You probably sit there muttering "cunt, bitch, money grubbing whore" as you sit across from any woman you're interested in. So I can see why you;d like to get yourself a woman who can't speak English and behaves how you want because yo…
/r/MensRights11/01/12 04:42 AM
6

If you click through to the article the writer makes mention that the girls mum works with them. The woman is probably proud of herself for "shaking up the system" and "making things fair", when all she has done is made her daughter an outcast. I'd be majorly pissed if I was at school and told I couldn't play a sport because not enough girls wanted to play for their team. I just hope they institute this policy equally across everything so everyone sees just how ridiculous it is. Stop footbal, ba…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 09:47 AM
1

Hi whole point was talking about giving sound advice and being told he's victim blaming. He was using the example of men having to be financially responsible for kids if a woman uses his sperm to have a kid, as a parrallel to the repercussions of unsound judgement. Getting too drunk to know what you're doing is stupid in any case, if you're a woman in a male frat party the chance of sexual activity consensual/non-consensual is going to increase tenfold. No means no in any case, but if it's a mat…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 06:04 AM
14

I pity the poor girl, Charlotte Murphy (the 11-year-old), who complained to the superintendant (probably at her mothers prompting), then got her reporter mum to speak to lawyers and women's groups. Every bloke in her district will know her name and know she's the one who brought all of this about. It just boggles my mind that the woman would allow her fellow workers to name her daughter, but I dare say she implored them to. Putting your kids name in the paper as the catalyst for this sort of thi…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 02:35 AM
1

The government should pay the money back and then use their process to go after the real father. They are the ones who forced him to pay money in the first place so they should reimburse the father. This would help make judicial reform as the government would want to make sure they get the right father to begin with. Realisitically if the state tells someone they have to do something, then discovers that the order was wrong, the onus should be on them to rectify the situation. It's a deplorable …
/r/MensRights10/01/12 01:29 AM
-1

He's just a troll. Anyone who disagrees with him and he posts: "Reported for anti-male shaming trolling, hopefully the mods do something about it. It's quite sad to see these manginas and white knights falling in line to defend western women and disparage men who correctly point out the flaws of western women. These are the same types who support laws that make it illegal for western men to seek out marriages with superior foreign women." I'm about as far from a white knight as you can get. I ha…
/r/MensRights09/01/12 09:21 AM
3

Definitely not on this thread. If you don't have friends who can hook you up wiht someone nice, then maybe it says something about yourself.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 08:28 AM
2

Prison isn't an option, unless they have the (substantial) means to pay. While I think the payment system in the US is an absolute joke, you can't really allow people to just not pay. That said I think living expenses and all that should be taken into account before they even look at their income. If they're going to garnish wages, the person should be able to put forward their rent, utilities and have a hunk left over for food, petrol and the rest before they calculate how much it is. I've hear…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 03:24 AM
6

Frankly it is all a farce. Sending someone to jail, because they cannot pay money for child support is just mind boggling. How are they to earn the money while in prison? How long are they held in prison? Is it until they can pay? Frankly it sounds to me like the private companies who operate the prisons have been pushing these laws and are making quite a lot of money off these guys. Another hidden fact is that a significant amount of prisons use inmates as labour for producing goods to sell on …
/r/MensRights08/01/12 02:29 AM
1

So you once said something that was so unthruthful is was considered defamtion, that what you said was as close to an outright lie, that a judge let it go to trial. Welcome to the world you lying bastard. Tell the truth and you won't have to worry about being taken to the cleaners. So yes, you might have not made upa lie, but what you said was so far removed from what a decent person would consider the truth, that it went through a trial. Then you were judge not guilty and there was enough discr…
/r/MensRights29/12/11 01:38 AM
1

You are an idiot. Playing at being someone who knows what they're talking about by bringing your ought-is idiot philosophical argument. You realise there are laws in place for a reason. But you are far too ignorant to acknowledge the fact that defamation can hurt someone in a way that can only be resolved or eased by financial compensation. Why would they have laws, that have been around for hundreds of years, which are regularly tested and never once seriously been considered for repeal, on the…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 01:27 AM
1

How do you calculate how people might react to you differently in the future because of misinformation that was spread about you? Sorry, but when it comes to the media you are an idiot. You have no concept of the dominoes of life that can fall because someone has made a defamatory statement about you. Look at the woman's Wiki page and you can see she is no amatuer when it comes to entertainment (which the companies that work in that industry have far more stringent measures to ensure people aren…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 08:14 PM
1

She did it in conjunction with a world wide campaign, wihch meant that her message was instantly disseminated and spread. Sorry, but in my opinion I value my reputation far more than my worldly possesions. If disaster struck and I lost everything I own, with my reputation I can get it all back working and using my contacts. You damage my reputation and a great many doors are going to be closed for me. While she shouldn't go to gaol, she should certainly suffer punishment for defaming him. It wou…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 06:52 PM
2

So if someone said something about you, claiming it to be true, which resulted in the loss of business, ruination of your council campaign and general loss of standing in the community, you wouldn't want that person punished? But one thing is, going for council makes your life in the public interest. So anything you do that can be linked to any of your stances, or policies is now fair game. Private citizens fortunately do not have to suffer the same public scrutiny. So what, do you think as your…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 05:53 PM
2

The 13k is what she gave him to settle the suit. That means they knew no matter what she would be paying money if it went to court. She and her lawyer were the ones who calculated that amount, but the guy could've taken her for a lot more. She is lucky she didn't come away with a 40k judgement, plus having to pay all of his reasonable legal costs. You obviously do not work anywhere that requires you to be a person of good standing within the community. If you did, you would realise that tarnishi…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 05:32 PM
2

Wow, when you can't argue, correct their spelling and grammar. By the way, realise is the correct spelling, unless you're going by the American bastardisation of the English language. But in case it's too difficult I can speak American too, I meant realize. While I said it was permissible, it is also actionable. I don't really get your point though. You agree she shouldn't have said it, but the wronged party shouldn't be able to claim damages? By your thinking if someone just dings your car, the…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 04:30 PM
2

So you're saying defamation is miniscule? You obviously have never had anyone rty and spread bullshit about you in the press. I have and am damned glad for defamation laws. Your whole bullshit cop out of ought-is shows you are just idealistic, with no actually working knowledge of what the media can do. Anyone with a scrap of talent can write themselves around an accusation, without flat out accussing someone. If you cannot do this then you deserve whatever legal action is brought against you. P…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 04:01 PM
4

Look, you have no idea of how the press works in Australia. Stop trying to talk as if you do. If you're an Australian based writer and have worked for major publications (which she has) there are many rules which you are made painfully aware of. Hence her pulling the thing after a few hours. By her own actions she knows it was highly fucking stupid. Too bad.If someone slips you poison in your food, but then pulls it back from you after only having a bite they have still poisoned you. Damage has …
/r/MensRights27/12/11 03:27 PM
8

But the fact is it was reblogged and spread. You have to realise this shit if you;re a professional writer, which she is meant to be. Magazines I've worked for have been sued over minor bullshit before and it just makes you have to be a better reporter. If she was smart she could have written it in a way saying his writing style is exactly the same as the one she attributed to him. She was stupid and is being punished for it. The guy looks like he wants a writing career too. This woman naming an…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 08:03 AM
3

I bet it's on Fox.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 03:11 AM
4

People are free to say what they want, but unless you can prove someone did something, don't say they did. It'd be like someone saying Obama gets dirty street hookers in so he can give them tongue baths. You cannot say that in a forum where it is expected to be believed and not be able to back it up with proof.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 02:16 AM
10

So by having someone say that you are the author of a bigoted and mysoginistic blog, which defames you just by being linked to it, you think there is no recourse? She said on a national and well read blog that he was behind the website about her. If having people reasonably believe that this is true, in Australia, he would be able to sue for defamation, which is also calculated by the amount of people who are privy to the defamation. Because it was on the web the amount of people would be at lea…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 02:14 AM
1

Why? Realistically if you don't believe in faith it's just some jackass splashing some water on your head. If you do, it's a rebirth into a sin free life. Either way I appluad the judge. The woman obviously is doing this post divorce and it sounds like it was intended to antagonise her ex. He's antagonising her as well, but fuck her. Play those games and don't be suprised when the other person plays too.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 06:14 AM
1

I'd really like to see them arrested for that. They wouldn't dare let it go unpunished as it would set precedent for pervs to take certain photos.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 09:33 PM
1

She didn't lie. Her sister got a weird voicemail and then they didn't know where she was. The girl was wearing a hijab, so I presume they're Muslims and the old stereo type of girls not going away without permission I dare say is what set this off. Who knows? It could have been her parents were pressuring her to marry someone, she might have gone off with a boyfriend, or gone to Vegas to bang hookers and play the slots.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 12:03 AM
1

Of course it would look suspicious, as they'd wonder why it took you so long to do something about it. If they ask just say you were speaking to people and they thought it was a disgrace - because you have and we did. I think the only problem will be if they try and deny it happened. But I dare say with you being refunded money means they knew they were screwed. I've never heard of a learning institution giving back money when someone didn't want to do a course any more. By that fact alone I sur…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 02:07 AM
3

I wholeheartedly think you should. Not only did she accuse you of cheating, or plagarism, but because of her you wasted all your time in that course with no result. Someone should pay for it, or you should receive some sort of credit for it. The fact that someone in a position of power was so adamant that you did not write the paper means she has some pretty heavy duty prejudices. She either has to be read the riot act, face some kind of censure, or some other form of rebuke or punishment to rat…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:22 AM
9

It'll be interesting how someone who stands for non-violence against women explains attacking a man, then admitting on camera that she did, for something as frivolous as recording her. If you take the standpoint that violence isn't ok, how on earth can you justify attacking someone who wasn't agrresive in any way.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 01:01 AM
2

Yep, but I seriously doubt we will ever see this written into any legislation anywhere in the world. It puts the ultimate burden of responsibility on the person who makes the final decision, but seeing as that person is female, their political organisations will brand it as sexist (which when it comes to reproduction is simply a fact). Another analogy is a driver picks up a hitchhiker, then suddenly tells them they're driving to the other side of the country. Now the passenger should have the ch…
/r/MensRights28/11/11 07:37 PM
3

No, if a man and woman are together, she goes on to have a kid and he's ok with it, then decides to up and leave he has to pay support. The only times I see that a guy shouldn't have to pay support is when he is unaware, or has stated he does not want to have a child with her. It's like buying a house with someone. There is a long process you go through to get to the point where you move in. You can't turn around a few weeks later and say "I'm moving out and not paying a cent. You're stuck with …
/r/MensRights28/11/11 07:24 AM
1

Some are, luckily my missus is great. But I've had ex's who were absolutely terrifying in their vindictiveness and sheer lack of restraint once they see I can get over them easily enough. As a whole I find most women pretty reasonable, even in after breaking up. But it's the 1% you only have to stuble on once to ruin your life.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 03:17 AM
0

That's true. Making the woman soley responsible for a child, unless she has permission from the father to use his sperm for fertilization of her eggs would solve a lot of problems. That way you would stop a lot of people having kids because they seem them as a way to gain money and the mantle of being a full time parent, so they don't have to get a career. This would help bring some equality to reproductive rights, in at least a financial and legal perspective. If men even suggested making a wom…
/r/MensRights28/11/11 01:56 AM
2

My point was a guy and girl can be together, talk about having a kid, then a month after the birth the bloke pulls the plug and gets out of there. If a man has knowledge of the woman being pregnant he should be able to assert his rights of reproduction by saying he doesn't want to have a child. Thereby relinquishing all rights and responsibilities. To give women the right to do this is without questions, as it involves their bodies. But men should have this right as well, if not biologically, th…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 10:53 PM
1

I disagree with this. It gives way too many deadbeats who would say they would be there, an out. What's to say she wouldn't have had an abortion if the douche said he was going to help raise the kid? Make the law that the woman in the first two trimesters has to use all reasonable methods to contact the man, or men she thinks might be the father. If she doesn't or cannot, her rights to sue for support are waived. There would be exceptions to this, but if after this support was ordered, she would…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 08:31 PM
7

And people hate the people they love the most. If a junkie rips you off, you get angry, if someone you love rips you off that anger, betrayal and resentment burn like hot lava. The ones who can hurt you the most are the ones you love and trust the most.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 08:15 PM
1

I'm with you there. I was wondering what it meant and then it clicked. I dare say the OP is a troll or a feminist troll trying to discredit the subreddit.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 09:12 PM
1

Exposing is one thing, but a modern day lynching? People are all getting emotional because they're sitting behind a computer and not realising the real life consequences this woman is bringing upon many who don't deserve it. Plus the main thing is motive. Look at it in terms of a relationship between a couple - if an ex had come back years later after having something of monetary value taken to reveal something highly embarrassing, she would most likely be charged with extortion or blackmail. In…
/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:56 PM
1

So you're all for public shaming? Should we bring back the stocks to the town centres and have people locked up there with a sign stating their crime so everyone can jeer at them? She did something that affects far more people than just him and did it in a deliberate way to try and ruin his life. If she wanted people to be shocked about it she could've wrote her little title with her mention of cerebal ataxis or whatever it was so people thought he was beating a retarded girl. But she named him …
/r/MensRights14/11/11 02:48 AM
1

She has stated it's the only video she has as she knew he was going to flip his shit royally that night, so she wanted to get it on tape. She hasn't said what her motivations to have it on tape were, but has tried to say she wanted to bring awareness to it. It's complete horseshit and everyone knows it, but as she cried and got a belt for a few minutes everyone feels sorry for her. Not allowing the father to have access to his daughter has nothing at all to do with any safety concerns they have …
/r/MensRights13/11/11 10:45 PM
1

I've worked in the media for quite a few years and I have seen many people utterly destroyed and made pariahs because of shit like this. Every single person who ever lived has done shit they don't want other people to know about. It's a fundamentally brutal violation of that trust to do something like this. You'd be pissed if they told people this, even more so if it was in the paper, but to purposely launch it where she hoped it would go viral is cause for her father to completely disown her. I…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 08:43 PM
1

Because it's important to state that to distance myself as a supporter of his (instead of being a detractor of the mother and duaghter Hillary). He does sound like he's an ass and is manipulative and controlling, but that doesn't excuse what they're (Hillary and her mother) doing. By doing this, it means the crazies who sit there and cry about how she was abused and manipulated have me accede to the fact he is a douche . Doing this makes it clear while I don't approve of him, what they're doing …
/r/MensRights12/11/11 11:21 PM
1

Which is the whole point. It is a smear campaign and I dare say he was told, "give me custody and more money or you and your family will regret it." If documenting and making public every misdeed about a ex's family you can remember isn't an act of vengence, then show me what is. What I find disturbing is this is harmful to her child as well. The little girl is going to have everyone know all this horrible shit about her dad. If there was a textbook on parental alienation this should be one of t…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:49 PM
1

My theory is that everyone who has stopped talking to the daughter has been painted badly in the papers. I totally agree that he might be a complete douche and there's probably a kernel or complete truth in almost everything she says. But wow. Date and marry a girl from highschool and she'd definitely have some horrible tales. But the way she has painted it, she can try and use the "he made me do every bad thing I did" excuse. She's also getting Hillary to publish shit constantly on twittter (ex…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:45 PM
2

But she's asking for more money. With all the attention being brought to this, and the methodical and calculated way the video was released and then advertised in multiple Reddits and on 4chan (yes she tried to get them to be her personal army and they decided to go ahead). Plus the fact that the daughter was fighting with her father over her 2007 Mercedes, which he was asking to get back because she wasn't doing anything with study and going for a job he thought was very shitty brings everyone'…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:02 PM
4

Here are some of the highlights: Told his wife she had to get an STD test in highschool because he fucked a Mexican hooker. He tortured small animals. He staged death scenes with small parts of his sisters bloody barby dolls. His mother was put in a mental institution multiple times for suicide attempts and she was an alcoholic, on prescription pills, mentally ill and cheated on his dad. His nephew has mental problems and lives at home with his parents. He has a cousin who went to the Betty Ford…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 10:39 AM
1

Who gives a shit. What kind of an idiot would want to use a tool that poorly functions and obviously confuses things. Let them have at it as they will.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 10:20 AM
0

You're over generalising there. I'm quite a large and strong. I've actually grown up to think the opposite. I'm well aware that I'm stronger than most people, but what I have learnt is if things do get physical, it has to be the very last option to be used. I know that getting violent has serious consequences and can cause lifelong or life threatening damage, so it's not to be used unless necessary. However, I believe with children there is no greater threat than "wait till your father gets home…
/r/MensRights04/11/11 06:33 PM
2

Personally I don't think spanking a kid with your belt is anything outrageous. The kid doesn't suffer any lasting physical affects past some welts. I think most people born before 1980 would have copped some kind of physical punishment from parents or even teachers. It's just because we live in a society where everyone is a little snowflake and can't handle (or want to pretend they can't) any of the rigours of life people have dealt with through human history. Personally I think psychological ab…
/r/MensRights04/11/11 07:39 AM
1

They might not be your kids if there was an affair the whole time. Maybe it's time to emotionally cut yourself off and get a paternity test. It'll be hard but she sounds like cancer. Prove they're not yours and have her existence excised from your life.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 03:54 AM
-1

They're with thier respective fathers right now except for the one with her. So they're probably a lot better off not having such an obviously detrimental force in their lives. What I liked was the judge called her on it and then told her parents (or whoever the relatives were) so, then informed them they can only see the kids if the father agrees. So they now have to be nice and I'd dare sare apologise to him and his new partner. The following was my favourite: He said the relatives who made th…
/r/MensRights29/10/11 01:02 AM
2

You could say exactly the same for women. I think if they should get it so should men.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:00 AM
0

I posted this in another link to do with this: As she is fond of sharing pics, here are some pics of Victoria: I call this her sexy pose. I don't know... Borat is young in this one. She likes her sweet chocolate. Loose weight? She has the sleek body of a cheetah. I couldn't think of a better ad for abstinence. Slap me with a fish here. Sparkly jacket Outside her place of work. Saying this is sexy just doesn't do it justice. How she treats her bartenders The poor man looks terrified. Ooooh yeah! …
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:07 AM
7

As she is fond of sharing pics, here are some pics of Victoria: I call this her sexy pose. I don't know... Borat is young in this one. She likes her sweet chocolate. Loose weight? She has the sleek body of a cheetah. I couldn't think of a better ad for abstinence. Slap me with a fish here. Sparkly jacket Outside her place of work. Saying this is sexy just doesn't do it justice. How she treats her bartenders The poor man looks terrified. Ooooh yeah! This is getting funny Insert something here EDI…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:58 PM
5

You can't tell whether or not he was hitting them to make them stay down. If there was knives and boiling oil and shit nearby, you can count on me making sure they stay down.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:50 AM
1

This law is excellent. Basically it says if a man is proven to not be the father biologically, he can have payments stopped, then have one year to appeal to a judge to be allowed to stay in the child's life. They said he had to prove it would be in the child's best interest if h was to stay in the kids life. So if you were suckered into paying for another man's kid for years, but grew to love the kid, you can stop paying support, but have a legal right to be part of the childs's life. So the mot…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 04:41 AM
14

This article leaves out some info here is a more detailed account. Too bad the weekend is here, gonna have to wait a few days until we find out if it's forgotten or if a shitstorm will erupt. We all know that had a man stalked a spouse they were divorcing and smashed her shit up he'd be ordered to stay away. By then the time has been spent viewing the matter and it's better to err on the side of caution. Here's another link to a pretty good write up.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:39 AM
8

Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:31 AM
2

There's no one issue. There are parental issues, sexism issues, false rape accusation issues, male rape, the disparity in prison sentences based on gender that are regularly touted. While I'm not a fan of sucking cock or taking it up the arse, I don't think they should be excluded just because they don't share a sexual prefernce with me. I'd liken this to being as bad as making a man feel bad or worried about being alone around children. Men aren't going to turn pedo all of a sudden and gay blok…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 08:38 AM
1

It sounds like both of them are on benefits and you can claim certain benefits and get a tax credit for which he signed for her. I would think that they had deducted the amount from his benefits each week, which $15 would amount to an extra goon (cask of wine) he probably would've spent it on.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 04:11 AM
6

Make me a sandwich.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 04:03 AM
1

Alright then, I apologise. I have never watched it myself, I just surmised from the deviant nature of 4chan's /b/ board and the prevalence of Bronies on there, that there was a sexual nature to it. By the way, which is your favourite?
/r/MensRights06/10/11 10:53 PM
-1

Not exactly, but I am proud to say I only know what Urban Dictionary tells me about them: "The male, older fans of My Little Pony." The one time I clicked open a link, they definitely weren't the sort of cartoon pony you'd let your kids see. But I suppose there could ne a non-sexual reason that grown men get very excited over a cartoon about ponies made for little girls.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 10:43 PM
3

Yeah it did point out it was from 4chan, so at least it doesn't say nigger a bunch and call them butthurt. As for any lesbians reading this - it's in men's rights and the title says it's from 4chan. Anyone who know's of 4chan knows it isn't going to be a witty and light commentary on gender equality or some other topic. They're going to be glad it's not adult men talking about their sexual fantasies about my little ponies and the like (in case you're wondering, I found out those guys are called …
/r/MensRights06/10/11 06:15 PM
8

I beg to differ, as feminism is the idea of removing restrictions on females and promoting the equality between sexes. By restricting criticisms on viewpoints of women claiming to be subducated, it is the antithesis of feminism. It's pointing out that a segment of extreme feminists who try to use a blanket accusation of misogyny to any male dissent on their opinions. Putting it simply there are those who will resort to name calling, accusations and insults if you disagree with them. It's just th…
/r/MensRights06/10/11 06:07 AM
1

You need to man up and stop whining like a little girl.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:10 AM
1

Alright I stand corrected. I did the Wiki search to double check what I remembered, but hadn't heard anything about surgery or psych problems.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 04:20 AM
2

But this woman was raped, no one is denying that. The medics who first treated her confirm her injuries, it's just that somehow the rape kit and photos of her injuries went missing while KBR had them. The case was about whether KBR "condoned a hostile sexual climate in Iraq". The fact that they locked her in a shipping container and denied her access to a phone is highly suss too. She managed to talk a bloke guarding her (yes, making sure the rape victim doesn't get out of the cell) into lending…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 03:17 AM
3

Sorry, thought you were saying that because they slept with the women they should pay. But yes, the men who impregnate the women should pay or better yet be a father to the kid.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:41 AM
0

Go back to playing with your rats.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:08 AM
4

You don't have to sign the birth certificate. The mother just has to have you listed on it. They can do this without any contact with your whatsoever. They can also say whoever they want on the certificate. They can get in trouble for lying on an official government document, but as long as they have a "reasonable suspicion" of a man being the father they're covered.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:33 PM
6

So why does this man have to pay? If it's society that is concerned, have the government support the woman and her kid. Sticking some unfortunate bloke with responsibilities which aren't his is compltely unethical. You might as well make it open season. Let women walk down the street and point to random men and say "that one will do." Also if it's for the best interest of the child make the mother write an itemised list of expenses with receipts for the child. Make it purchases under $5 don't ha…
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:28 PM
1

That's the most laughable question ever. Have you ever heard of a custody dispute? Parents who disagree on custody tend to loose all sense of what's reasonable and what's fair. They rarely even think about what's best for the children, even though they say that's all they care about. Quite simply in society women feel they have more of a right to custody than the fathers and most people tend to side with this type of thinking. Have a look at this case, we have a woman with a terminal illness, th…
/r/MensRights21/09/11 05:44 AM
1

You do realise mental abuse stemming from a parent having their own psychological issues is far more damaging and long lasting than physical abuse. With the physical there are usually indicators and once the punishment is delivered it's over. Mental abuse is a constant continual torment. A kid never knows when they're going to be creamed at out guilted out the next. They don't really know what they can do which will make them seem like a good kid. Nothing they can do can avoid the psychological …
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:14 PM
1

SHe's disgracefully using her illness as a reason for keeping her kids. If she really was determined to stay in their lives and not just keep them from the father she would move to Chicago. She has already been accused of mental instability and been arrested (so has the father, but I wonder who is to blame) - which is incredible as she would've had to do some crazy shit for a woman to be arrested on domestic violence. They have doctors there and hospitals too. She has no job keeping her anywhere…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 09:34 PM
13

It's not any woman's fault and I don't think anyone here is trying to say that. It's some idiot who probably thought he could make himself look better by hitting a guy (it's sounding like a sucker punch to me) who was insulting them. The dead guy worked in local restaurants so it's possible he even knew the women and they might've taken it as a joke (just surmising from the article). Believe it or not, women tend to hate this kind of white knight too. Sure it'd be nice to have someone stick up f…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 07:50 PM
3

What you're talking about is egalitarianism. Feminism deals with just making sure women are equal.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 05:20 AM
6

I know what she said is a glaring stereotype, but even it was true across the board, I think (I'm not trans or anything) it's like when a fat chick looses a heap of weight. She wants to start wearing all the sexy shit she's wanted to for years and kinda goes all out looking sexy as she's never been able to do it before. If I felt that I was a woman but had looked like a man all my life I'd go all out trying to make myself feel good. Same with the women who become men. Of course they want to look…
/r/MensRights16/09/11 04:47 AM
9

But should the woman get half of what the man's family has paid for a house? As this is listed in the article one of the main reasons for this. Do the parents have to then buy them another house, so they can attract a woman? All it does is make it easy. If you are in a good marriage, then you can add your wife's name to the deed. If not, then you can divorce and split assets since the marriage. Then the man isn't left homeless or on the breadline. As it said, it enables women to keep their house…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:54 AM
2

I like how even though she's calling him horrible through her opening, he ends up only looking slightly bad and she has no option but to paint the woman in a bad light. When you've got someone saying a man is a scumbag and is trying to bully you, but you still come out looking like that, you don't have any moral highground. But honestly if you know where someone is, who they are and all about them for 17 years, there is no way a person can try and paint that person as a deadbeat parent. If anyth…
/r/MensRights31/08/11 05:44 PM
1

You would have to look at his case history to see how he has ruled. They say he's regarded as one of the best family law judges in the state. IT could be that he's fair so doesn't have as many complaints. That being said it looks like this woman is just grubbing for money. After trying to put in a claim over a decade ago, then running when the judge tried to have his paternity established (which would see him have a good chance of custody), she "ran like the wind". Child support is meant for the…
/r/MensRights31/08/11 05:26 PM
2

It's like the Memphis three. You have the option of just sucking it up and go for the least injustice. Otherwise he'd have to sit in jail and fight tooth and nail for this stuff to be overturned. Because you can guarantee if he said no, the prosecutors would do everything in their power to make sure it wasn't overturned. So, do you admit to something you didn't do and then fight for the record to be changed afterwards? In his position I would do the same. I'd rather be struggling to clear my nam…
/r/MensRights31/08/11 10:33 AM
1

I posted a link to it below.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 04:38 AM
2

So it's not some stupid video in Taiwanese(?) here isthe link for the article.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 04:37 AM
1

She's lost her job and likely won't get another in the media. It's bad, but at least she didn't actually point to a person and say they did it. Yes she wasted cops time, but being famous, people are going to find out about this every time they google her name. Give her community service, then work out what the cost of the investigation, add some court costs and that let her go. If she can't afford it, then lock her up. What's really sad is that if she ever is assualted now, as soon as the cops f…
/r/MensRights28/08/11 12:35 PM
1

The court went to the extraordinary lengths of saying this: "Sir Nicholas said: ‘Allegations of sexual abuse were first made by the mother and not by X. These were false and the mother knew them to be false. X was coached by the mother to make allegations of sexual abuse against the father.’" The source is here. The fact is how British papers are geared, this woman would be able to sue the hell out of them if there was any doubt to the claim. If you want some background on here go check out some…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 08:04 PM
9

She still has her website up saying that everyone is against her and they're all telling lies. From looking through a few articles is seems that the allegations were made by her then and she coashed the daughter. On her website she offers as proof quotes from a police interview. The sad thing is she seems to have a history of gold digging and sleeping with married men, plus a rather dismal career in racing. So this case is one of two things - a mother so vindictive she's willing to manipulate he…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 11:04 AM
3

I didn't read the thread it came from, but from the snippet in the pic, it seems lady_catherine is what he says - a sexist woman who's jumping on fragments of a cause that suit her goals. Just like the religous teachers in various religions who pick and choose parts of their texts to justify their own beliefs. A person who freely admits hating men, is also a mod on /r/kidsrights and /r/radicalparenting. That raises all kinds of red flags. Having a prejudiced, man hating (I presume) woman giving …
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:03 PM
-1

Yes, I understand. My point being that the penis is formed from the clitoris (we start as women in the womb, then transform into dudes if we have the XY chromosone). I'm not saying it isn't bad, it's just that circumcision is legal on boys, but cutting a clit off isn't.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 03:43 AM
0

This is pretty fucking disgraceful. I think that female circumcision shouldn't be compared to this as that's the equivalent of chopping off a guys knob (which might have happened here). But what should happen is the woman charged under the same punishment as female circumcision for this, as it possibly and might have the same effect - lifetime disfigurement, which would lead to a host of psychiatric problems throughout his life.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 08:01 PM
2

First thing you do is start a diary and list every conversation, correspondence and interaction you have with her. Write as detailed notes as you can and make no mention of your desires to get him back until everything is ready and you're ready to serve her with documents. I would look at the wiretapping laws in your state and see if it's a two person or one person consent. If one, then tape calls, especially when she's being unreasonable. Try and push her buttons in very reasonable ways - for e…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 10:07 PM
0

No, but if you force someone to pay for a child, they're going to end up resenting that child and the fact that it gives this ex they want nothing to do with a hold over them. Having a financial hold on someone and being able to use the government to punish them if they're not going to meet up to them means they're going to hate the causes for that. Namely the child and especially the mother. So there wouldn't really be a chance of the father taking custody at a later date after reflection on th…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 09:36 PM
0

How does that make sense? I see this as a way to encourage people to share custody and the cost of bringing up a child. Both parents would buy clothes, both would feed them. It would be an active incentive for people to be more careful about who they have a child with and when they have one. Or maybe you agree with the US version, where if a guy loses his job and cannot pay his child support because of this, he can be thrown into jail because of the Kafkaesque state mandate about child support. …
/r/MensRights04/08/11 06:08 AM
-1

Yeah, but I'm talking about responsibility. If I kick a kid in the face there are going to be repercussions. Just like If I impregnate a woman, my responsibilities are gonna change. If you spray your sperm in any woman who comes along, you're risking kids popping up at any time.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 05:07 AM
2

Isurance companies do not look at anything but the figures. You're being charged on the fact that your age, location and sex have a high risk of a payout. Suck it up and get your mum or sister to register it and if you get in an accident say you only drive it very occasionally.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:01 PM
0

Sorry I meant donated sperm in the figurative sense as in he had sex with her. If a man cums inside of a woman, in my opinion, he has left that sperm to her to possibly impregante her. Might not be his intention, but it's what has happened. Even if you use a condom, it could break, rupture, have a leak, so there is the chance she will get pregnant. Kind of like saying if you drive a car you might get into an accident. It probably won't happen, but there is the very real risk it might. You drive …
/r/MensRights27/07/11 09:23 PM
-4

Hey while I think morally a guy should have a say, it's in a woman's body and therefore her choice. If you try and give men a say in women's reproductive rights when they've donated sperm you're opening a whole Pandora's box of nastiness. Just off the top of my head, what if the guy was nuts? What if he didn't want to break up and made her keep the kid so he could be involved in her life? What if it could adversley affect the woman's health? As for men having to pay for a kid, even if they don't…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 11:57 AM
8

Seriously guys, rape is a very prevalent thing in India, with most women being ignored when they report it. So imagine the fact that there is a massive social stigma attached to it and knowing you're gonna have a hard time reporting it. That being said, the cops in rural areas will probably take half of that and threaten to charge the women for a false allegation if they refuse to pony up. Just type Indian police abuse into a search on youtube. These are some corrupt bastards - they're paid next…
/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:21 AM
0

Cool story bro.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 08:47 AM
-2

Why are you being down-voted? I think you make a valid point.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:00 AM
1

She sounds exactly like my ex of three years, who also tried to hang a kid on me once we broke up. Even though we hadn't had sex for two months before when it was meant to be conceived (she was a drunk and I told her we did it one last time the night before on the day I moved out). First bit of advice is to create a new bank account and have 20% of your pay to go into it. Have the address for it at your parents. Get any precious momentos you have that you don't want destoryed out of there. Now t…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 11:33 AM
17

I really can't believe this. The premise of the argument here is that women expect every man to be out to rape them. Honestly if you're that neurotic that you're paranoid about a man potentially raping you at any moment, have a friend accompany you to your room. I understand rape happens all too often in society, but are we at the stage where a woman can't look at a man without imagining him as a rapist? A lot of women talk about prejudices against women, but this is the most blatantly trumpeted…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 07:48 AM
3

It's a wise policy. After all he could've saved himself a huge amount of trouble by getting a prostitute and not thinking he's so enticing to women that a maid would come onto him. There was even talk of something like this happening when there were talks about his running for the presidency.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 02:28 AM
1

Only nutjobs would disagree with you there.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 05:18 AM
1

Isn't one of the women named in the article the woman who made the claims against Assange?
/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:25 AM
0

So you think the dressing sexy is like supersizing a meal "I'll have one rape supreme." Face it men can dress howevere they want, they might get an ass kicking but they won't be raped. Why should women have to worry about people like you thinking it's okay to forcibly fuck someone if they wear something sexy? Plus I'm not a feminist and I'm the first to say Tits or Get the fuck out
/r/MensRights11/06/11 08:33 AM
-1

Honestly if a guy is that frustrated that he feels the need to rape someone, have him go to a prostitute. At least the emotional damage that is done to the woman is going to be agreed on. Make no mistake, if you don't want to have sex with someone it's going to be emotionally damaging. Imagine you being a bloke if Hulk Hogan paid you a million (which you needed for a life saving operation for a family member) to plus every hole you had, for a riveting, eye popping 12 hour marathon bedroom extrav…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 03:08 AM
1

I don't quite agree with you there, but do admit getting blackout drunk is not the smartest thing for any man or woman to do. It's for this reason I reckon there is the idea that college rape is a problem in America. Probably half the guys have had their sorority borthers throw one up to old poop shoot as a joke when you've passed out drunk. Then the old spread the misery justification comes in "it didn't mess me up." Quite frankly only rapists deserve to be raped. Dressing sexy means a woman wa…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 02:56 AM
0

Women who are of the thought "all men are rapists" generally have been mistreated by men in some of the most horrible ways. How can you expect someone who is emotionally damaged to have a balanced point of view. Myself I put feminists into two categories: 1) Women who generally want to level out the gender equality, which is still prevalent, but not endemic. 2) Women who have been hurt by men who feel by attacking visages of their former tormentors can assuage thier feelings of depression, unwor…
/r/MensRights26/01/11 12:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter