Taaargus Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe". That's just a completely dumb and incorrect statement.	/r/BlackPillScience	11/11/23 01:15 PM
1	Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe". Again, you're just wrong. No feminist would ever claim anything other than the entire world is a patriarchy, which is just an obvious fact given that men dominate all positions of power especially when you focus on the top 1% of wealth and influence.	/r/BlackPillScience	11/11/23 01:14 PM
1	Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe". Again, a study saying that women count wealth and status as attractive things when considering partners doesn't mean what you're saying. You're tangling everything together in a massive straw man, and then you're not even really taking down that straw man. Nothing about this study implies the cause of this preference. It just says women are attracted to wealth. It has nothing to do with the agency of women or any of the underlying motivations you're implying.	/r/BlackPillScience	11/11/23 04:16 AM
1	Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe". Again - how does women's selection of partners have any bearing on whether or not we "live in a patriarchy" or whether or not feminism is "valid"? Your basic premise makes zero intuitive sense.	/r/BlackPillScience	11/11/23 03:22 AM
1	Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe". I really don't see how any of this is at all related. Everyone is attracted to status and wealth. One way to get status and wealth is to marry someone with status and wealth. This fact has nothing to do with whether or not we live in a male-dominated society. I just don't understand what this has to do with feminism at all. Women being attracted to status and wealth just means you're saying women are human beings.	/r/BlackPillScience	11/11/23 01:21 AM
1	Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe". Yes. Sweden definitely is also a patriarchy. It's not a thing that's connected to any one country. It's a worldwide phenomenon. It's frankly downright weird that you think I'm making a controversial statement.	/r/BlackPillScience	11/11/23 01:19 AM
1	Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe". But i don't think anyone would realistically argue there's a society on earth today that's not male-dominated or doesn't value money. Therefore, seeing that women around the world are attracted to money and power doesn't actually change anything about what people are saying. I'm not trying to point out a methodological error. I'm pointing out that this is exactly what you'd expect to see when we live in a world where all societies are sexist and focused on power and wealth.	/r/BlackPillScience	10/11/23 02:41 PM
1	Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe". Wait you're serious? You think that a study showing women being attracted to status means the patriarchy or sexism don't exist? You realize women's opinions would be impacted by societal norms and expectations right?	/r/BlackPillScience	10/11/23 02:32 PM
1	#NOSIMP (Repost for Rule 10 Violation) I don’t think there could be anything at all that’s less new than men paying women for this sort of thing.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/03/21 02:26 PM
1	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. Alright bud. I don’t know what to say other than you’re just arguing in total bad faith at this point. You can’t ask for insane levels of detail in my claims while making your own claims without said detail. Especially since you’re the one making claims that are entirely counterintuitive. I also have absolutely no problem with saying yes, overall trends that, again, are pervasive in all levels of our politics and economy are more important than your cherry picked areas where you’re claiming men …	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 09:37 PM
1	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. In specific areas. Where then in others it shows the exact opposite. The problem for you is the areas where it shows the exact opposite are far broader and further reaching than the rest. You’re also just contradicting yourself at this point. If I can’t just claim that men “are heavily disadvantaged” by pointing to an area or two where that may be the case, while simultaneously saying that I’ve failed to show that women are disadvantaged while I’m pointing to clear trends in all levels of econom…	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 09:25 PM
1	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. Thanks for literally proving my point in your second to last response. You’re right. It does convey it through data points as in, a bunch of data points across a variety of areas of society. Glad we’re in agreement.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 08:35 PM
1	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. What in the world are you talking about it's only one data point? You're going to actually try to claim that being more likely to be in positions of power in every single level of society is one data point? How in the world am I supposed to take your argument in good faith? Yes, I understand what the pay gap means. You, apparently, do not. It does not mean women get paid less for the same work, sure. But women are statistically less likely to end up in jobs that are well paid, and once they are …	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 08:17 PM
1	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. I said pretty much only disadvantageous. Which is true. I didn’t say literally every aspect was disadvantageous, but by and large the way women are treated by and large leads to worse financial and social outcomes for them then men. Give me a break about data. Where are your statistics? You’re the one making counterintuitive claims, but I’m the only one who has to provide data? That’s just arguing in bad faith. I’ve repeatedly called out the reality that I’m about to describe, but sure, here it …	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 02:23 PM
1	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. Conversation starts with a guy claiming women have more rights than men. I point out that’s insane and society is clearly skewed the other way. Guy comes along and tells me I’m the one doing mental gymnastics while actively ignoring societal and historic realities. Really glad I engaged and was able to have this conversation with you. It’s been so great. Truly hope you continue to have what’s clearly a great fulfilling life.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 04:35 AM
1	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. It’s actually insane that I’d have to explain why laws in place during the lifetimes of people today would have an impact on today’s society. Are you also saying structural racism doesn’t exist because none of the laws are on the books anymore? “Back then” is, from a legal perspective, 100 years ago, and clearly the societal effects are still in place today. I refuse to continue discussing this topic with someone who won’t come to terms with this basic fact. It’s completely absurd.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 03:42 AM
0	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. How am I the one choosing arbitrary things? I’m commenting on the overarching structure of society. You’re picking out individual metrics that enhance your point while ignoring everything else. I fail to see how this is anything other than you being arbitrary.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 03:26 AM
1	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. Alright bud. If actual laws discriminating against women being present in the lifetimes of people who are still alive, and thousands of years of clear societal structure, doesn’t convince you then you just don’t want to be convinced. Fine.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 03:07 AM
0	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. Ok but my entire point is that nothing of what you said disproves what I said. Pointing out that men suffer more in some of the worst ways society has to offer doesn’t really change the experience of the average man or women. I didn’t say that women have no advantages. I said the way that society is structured means that, in the structural sense, men have the vast majority of advantages. Pointing out that more men are homeless, etc. doesn’t change that.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 02:55 AM
1	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. Well first off, we wouldn’t talk about those items because, again, I’m primarily responding to a comment that said men “have less rights” than women. And either way if we want to dig into the horrible parts of society there’s plenty to go around. How about who is the higher percentage of sex slaves? Or who is abused more often by their partners? Raped more often? The list goes on. But anyways I’m glad we agree that the comment I said was ridiculous to start this chain was, in fact, ridiculous. N…	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 02:44 AM
0	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. Literally everything you’re saying only proves my point. Yes, society produces bad end results for men. But on any statistical average, unless you’re going to only talk about specific items, women are worse off than men. So sure, if you want to act like homelessness and suicide are the only measures of a lack of wellbeing (and ignore the fact that women attempt suicide at a higher rate than men), knock yourself out. But there are dozens more statistical measures that make the opposite argument. …	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 02:23 AM
-4	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. You’re talking about end results. Yes men have parts of their lives that are specifically worse than women. That doesn’t change the fact that society has been structured around the idea that men are superior to women for thousands of years. At any level of society, men are more present in powerful and authoritative positions than women. Suicide and homelessness statistics don’t change that.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/09/20 01:14 AM
-9	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. Right. In a way that’s pretty much only disadvantageous. How can you actually say women have more rights when men dominate literally every significant aspect of society? When we’re only like five or six generations removed from women getting the right to vote? Give me a break.	/r/PussyPassDenied	23/09/20 11:04 PM
-6	There’s Pros & Cons to both sides. Jesus Christ this sub is trash.	/r/PussyPassDenied	23/09/20 10:48 PM
1	MAJOR SJW ENDGAME SPOILERS So you can tell it’s single handedly because of 5 minutes of footage? Never occurred to you that probably it’s the culmination of the entire film and the efforts of all the characters?	/r/MGTOW	18/04/19 07:15 PM
3	MAJOR SJW ENDGAME SPOILERS Imagine being so easily triggered that having a woman - who is established to be one of the most powerful people in the canon - included in the victory in a movie freaks you out.	/r/MGTOW	18/04/19 06:55 PM
-10	#MenAreAwesome Because it’s purposely leaving out any participation women may have had in the building of these cities. Who’s to say some of those buildings weren’t paid for by companies with female leadership? Or female accountants? Or just the wives that took care of everything else in the lives of those workers? It’s also claiming credit for people (i.e. us, sitting on reddit) for things other men did. It’s also just generally part of a generally overly macho BS simplification of things that amounts to “bui…	/r/MensRights	09/02/18 07:01 PM
95	#MenAreAwesome How is this supposed to be a good way of pushing back against whatever discrimination you say you’re seeing? If people are diminishing “your” accomplishments by grouping us as a gender, why is it good to feed into that with this type of BS? Why not just go the route of “we’re all in a society that works together”? How is bragging about something you didn’t even participate in supposed to help anyone? Why are we supposed to buy that building skyscrapers is more important than the various accompli…	/r/MensRights	09/02/18 05:10 PM
1	But what if she’s got a bottle?! As a somewhat smaller than average man who doesn't really keep in shape anymore, I sometimes wish I got this protection. Not that I'd ever use it, but also the fact of the matter is I'm just as much of an opponent as a fit, slightly bigger than average woman. Like Ray Rice could knock me out just as easily as his girlfriend, but he could basically do it with impunity. Could be nice to have some extra insurance.	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/11/17 03:31 PM
1	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted The only thing I was ever disputing here is a person who said "men are systemically ignored by society". It's a nonsense statement, that apparently we agree on. Apologies for not being able to argue with a person who (as you already bragged about) has had this exact conversation dozens of times. I don't have the time or inclination to go to great lengths to prove relatively mundane points. If that's a cause for mental counseling, I'll take suggestions on a therapist.	/r/MensRights	24/10/17 01:19 AM
0	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted Good to see you had your copypasta ready. Congrats. You're right. Men are the oppressed class and that's why your life is how it is. Very sad.	/r/MensRights	24/10/17 01:00 AM
0	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf This is the part where you pick apart the study because it doesn't fit your own views and narratives and because rape/sexual assault is notoriously hard to track, let alone define. But any given statistical study shows what I said, so I'm not really going to get into that kind of discussion.	/r/MensRights	24/10/17 12:15 AM
1	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted You can't have it both ways. It can't be that you're pointing to the sidebar to justify why "men are systemically ignored" and then when I say those things don't imply men are ignored, that's not what you said. You boiling down sexual assault to "catcalls" would be like me saying men commit suicide because they get upset every now and then. You say men are poor - women are statistically poorer. You say men don't have status - women have less. You ask me for citations on widely accepted facts, bu…	/r/MensRights	24/10/17 12:11 AM
1	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted You're just willfully attributing things to me I never said. I'm not disagreeing that these aren't problems, or that these aren't specific to men, or that they shouldn't get more attention. You're claiming I am, but I'm not. I am saying that, in spite of these terrible things not getting the attention they deserve, none of that adds up to "men are systemically ignored by society". In fact, even in light of those stats, and the terrible things that do happen to men in our society, I find that sta…	/r/MensRights	23/10/17 08:36 PM
0	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted Ha! You're telling me to put in effort, when the crux of your argument is "go read some tired arguments on the sidebar of a biased sub". Ok bub. Sorry I'm not immediately convinced, and that I attributed them too closely to you or whatever. I have read them, and I don't get why you think they should be taken as the word of god or whatever. Still gonna go ahead and definitely disagree with the statement of "men are systemically ignored by society". What a lunatic I am.	/r/MensRights	23/10/17 08:16 PM
0	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted If you're going to act like female sexual assault victims don't also suffer from the same skeptical BS I guess we're done here. They both have it awfully bad, and then on top of that there are vastly more female victims. None of your arguments about males as a whole being ignored are at all convincing, and what's more all of them can be pretty easily countered by basically men experiencing what women/minorities experience on a regular basis, not just when they are otherwise victimized.	/r/MensRights	23/10/17 05:41 PM
0	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted I agree that male sexual assault victims don't get the support/attention they deserve. But that's really just a problem for sexual assault victims in general (see: Weinstein getting away with what he did for years). Male victims definitely suffer from a unique set of circumstances though (i.e. Why wouldn't you want it from her?). Either way, taking that and concluding "men are ignored by society" as a whole is ridiculous.	/r/MensRights	23/10/17 03:51 PM
-3	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted I mean I guess, but it's also relevant to the conversation. People here are acting like acknowledging that women are the majority of victims is the same as ignoring the male victims. Which is ridiculous.	/r/MensRights	23/10/17 02:59 PM
-1	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted There's plenty of fucked up things men are taught about sex. You have to initiate or you'll be forever alone - but don't be too aggressive or ask the wrong person because it might be unwanted and you'll get fucked! Stuff like that. None of that means men are anywhere near "systematically ignored" by society. Men who are sexually assaulted have their own unique set of issues brought about by society's fucked up approach to these things. That doesn't change the fact that sexual assault is generall…	/r/MensRights	23/10/17 02:22 PM
-3	Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaulted Any individual who goes through sexual assault/harassment, etc. has been through something horrible, full stop. It just also so happens that the (probably vast) majority of people who go through that in the first place are women.	/r/MensRights	23/10/17 02:19 PM
10	Sign in a shared restroom in Cleveland Eh. A sign is aggressive for sure, but I gotta say I've always been of the mind that the downside for a woman (being in a rush and ending up in the toilet) is worse than for men (slight inconvenience or adjusting my aim). Acting like its our damn duty or something is ridiculous, but I do it when I can.	/r/MensRights	26/04/17 03:34 AM