| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wikipedia Isn't Neutral at all. <--- Women's Rights. Link to Men's Rights Within.that's because there arent that many. also, this page is probably being oppressed by men, too. there's a lot of dudes who are using their right as people to say that MR isnt that significant. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/12 02:53 AM |
| 0 | Wikipedia Isn't Neutral at all. <--- Women's Rights. Link to Men's Rights Within.A long way to go... You mean all of history? I'm sorry, but men have always been in power. Theres laws now that make women equal. That said, the ideas surrounding most men such as the ability to overpower a woman, more obvious and scary anger, and simply the traditional role of being a hunter still exist. Yet the once powerless people now have the power to oppress as well. And even that doesn't really happen that much. Men still get paid more. Men still fill more jobs than women. Men are still i… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/12 02:50 AM |
| -3 | Wikipedia Isn't Neutral at all. <--- Women's Rights. Link to Men's Rights Within.Women's Rights: a real movement inwhich (historically powerless) women gained equality. Men's Rights: an internet forum where (historically powerful) men complain that women now have too much power. This has no significance compared to the Women's Rights Movement. It's not close to the same level. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/12 02:38 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter