TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tabbers16 Archive

View 3 posts and 21 comments by Tabbers16 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I would also argue that exists in the military and certain college communities to an extent. As well as some areas of the porn industry.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:05 PM
1

As someone who likes dark humor this joke could potentially work on some level. But the joke would have to be framed so that the reader would be laughing at how petty, crazy and pathetic the person doing this would hypothetically be. The closest example I can think of would be a movie like "The Cable Guy" The problem is that this article seems to want us to laugh at the man who had the audacity to maybe cheat, so it just comes off as mean spirited.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 12:39 AM
1

I was going to say that as well, but the more I think about it, this could actually be a good step to ending conscription by bringing discussion of it to the forefront. If the law doesn't pass, it will bring up the question, "If we wouldn't pass a law making women sign up for conscription, why would we keep a law that makes men sign up?". If the law does pass, I have no doubt that there will be a big movement to repeal the law, in which case, we can ask the same question.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 07:42 PM
4

to be fair, it is entirely possible that that's the case, or maybe she didn't want to go through the stress of a trial. The same way that we shouldn't rush to assume the guilt of someone accused of rape, we shouldn't automatically assume that the accuser is a malicious false accuser as soon as some doubt is cast upon a case.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:52 PM
1

I'm perfectly fine with dark humor and shock humor, what pisses me off is that it's not even really treated as shock humor. Shock humor relies on the audience understanding that what is being said is awful (aka shocking), to get a sort of "I can't believe they just said that" reaction. I don't really get that vibe here. The difference between joking about a serious issue, and treating a serious issue as a joke might be hard to see for some people, but I think it's an important difference.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:11 AM
1

I think this thread may be jumping the gun. The story says, After a four-month investigation, authorities dismissed a charge of felony domestic assault against Cunningham on Tuesday, saying ''there was no proof beyond a reasonable doubt for the charged offense.'' Does that really sound like proof, or even compelling evidence, of a malicious false allegation? We all know it's wrong to say, "This person was accused of a crime? I'm instantly going to assume this person's guilty!", but if we assume …
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:40 PM
1

Okay, I actually agree that in society at large, women tend to be objectified far more often than men. So, as a whole, the problem of female objectification is worse than the problem of male objectification, BUT I disagree that that means that an individual instance of objectifying a woman, is inherently worse than an an individual instance of objectifying a man. Imagine if there was a deadly virus going around and it starting infecting a lot of people, then someone who was infected with a less …
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:14 AM
11

A lot of people on reddit (cough, srs, cough) who see posts like this like to ask "Why do you MRA's want men to be able to hit women so much?!". As if there's no difference between swatting away an attacker, and viciousy beating your partner because you had a bad day at work. I like to turn that statement back on them and ask, "Why do you want women to be able to hit men, with impunity, so much ?"
/r/MensRights02/08/14 06:56 AM
5

Even if you ignore the sexist element (which you shouldn't), it still seems like a bad moral for a film. The film is basically saying, Hey kids! If people don't act how you want them to it's okay to manipulate and control them!
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:32 AM
-4

No, I'm saying that the person who was stabbed with two knives is probably a more urgent case, and although ideally it would be best to treat both of their wounds, I wouldn't really blame someone for giving the guy with two stab wounds higher priority, since his wounds present more of an immediate threat than the wounds of the guy with one stab wound. I actually do agree that it would have been better to outlaw circumcision as well, but FGM seems more urgent.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 03:05 AM
-8

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ The procedure that seems the closest to male circumcision is the removal of the skin above the clitoris, a rare variation of type 1 FGM. The other types of FGM seem to be far more damaging and crippling than male circumcision. While I believe that male infant circumcision should also be banned, it also seems to me that FGM is a far more urgent issue right now.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:41 AM
3

This is a clear cut case of outrage addicts. Being outraged provides a rush, a rush which can become addicting. And, like an addict searching back-alleys for drugs, these people desperately scour the internet looking for the next statement to be offended at. So they see Bill Maher making a metaphor involving slapping a woman, to stop them from murdering you, they do some mental gymnastics and turn it into "Bill Maher supports domestic abuse", and they get their sweet, sweet fix of outrage. And h…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 05:17 AM
1

Here's my opinion on it. It looks more like the slap was retaliation then self-defense. Therefore, I think that the best reaction would have been to turn the other cheek and leave it to security. However, it's unreasonable to expect someone to act 100% ideally when they're being assaulted, so I think that this should NOT be held against him.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 08:07 PM
2

I agree completely.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:05 PM
3

yes that would be more accurate. I would be fully in favor of changing "boys will be boys" to "children will be children". In this post I was just trying to address a commonly used saying.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 08:05 PM
1

actually, yeah that sounds about what I was thinking of, thanks for showing me it. I'm not sure if I should delete this post, so I'll keep it up for now, but that does sound like what I was looking for. I meant to ask if the sub already existed, but I forgot to, but thanks.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 07:52 PM
1

definitely similar to mensrants but more specific.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 07:37 PM
1

I definitely like the idea of a more feminist/ more intersectional men's rights subreddit. If you get it started i'd be glad to join and contribute.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:35 PM
2

that is just messed up
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:18 AM
4

I think so
/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:59 PM
1

I think you made a typo
/r/MensRights13/07/12 12:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter