TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Taco474 Archive

View 0 posts and 203 comments by Taco474 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is one of the best arguments I've seen for the death penalty. People like her who have spent their entire lives causing harm dozens of times, and in this case ending in murder? I'd pay good money to watch that execution, and we could donate the proceeds to the victims of these crimes. Okay, maybe that's a bit ridiculous, but still fuck her.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:17 PM
1

You're a fucking retard if you think men wouldn't be arrested for going around and pulling down their pants in public for everybody to see, stop lying to yourself.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 02:02 PM
3

Literally the entire movement is about pretty shit
/r/MensRights31/10/17 01:56 PM
4

It sounds like we should just draft everybody and assign them to the roles they'd be best at. It's almost like nature decided to make men the fighters and hunters, so we'd be better at it.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 05:12 PM
1

That's fine by me. If we are going to war, I'd rather we all get into this together, even if it means more men in combat. If our country ever requires a draft, I would rather we use every single person we require to defend our country instead of not allowing women because it'd cause more men to die in combat.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 04:18 PM
2

This is the most important part about men's rights to me. Men have many factual, concrete problems that can be demonstrated and displayed. Feminism is almost entirely based on personal experience, anecdotes, conspiracy theory-level drawing of conclusions, and stuff that's generally not possible to actually prove.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 03:24 PM
3

Yeah it's sad but funny. "Patriarchy is men expecting women to look good for them, and expecting ladylike behavior all the time or they'll be shunned". I usually just respond with the exact opposite, like "Matriarchy is women expecting men to provide for them and to be the ones to win their heart! Ladys, fight the toxic femininity that the matriarchy has tricked you with!". They usually can't understand how it's entirely a matter of perspective instead of any actual patriarchy or matriarchy exis…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:42 AM
0

What's wrong with that? It's communism, that's not his fault for taking advantage of a system that encourages doing nothing.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 03:52 PM
0

Dead Blacks Don't Steal
/r/MensRights03/08/17 03:39 PM
2

But you'll be in jail...
/r/MensRights20/07/17 04:42 AM
4

Wow, that's really fucking sad. I don't know if I'd be able to keep myself together if I had kids and I wasn't sure if I could even keep them safe, or get them a place to sleep for tomorrow, or for the next few days.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:30 AM
5

Aha, you can't even do that sometimes. In a few countries, you're literally going to face prison if you just leave somebody when they're having a heart attack, stroke, if they got into an accident, and similar things. Leaving the scene of an emergency isn't even an option, and not trying to help in some way can also be punishable.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:27 AM
3

Yeah, that's why people are getting annoyed at all this stuff, even in subreddits like this that aren't normally against it. Nobody wants kids to be put in danger, or have their social life and their mental development damaged because their parents didn't want to just let them be the boy or girl they were born as. If the kids decide to be trans or whatever later on, that's fine, but there is no harm in letting them be raised normally, you know.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:46 PM
5

It does say sex. That's the fucked up part, because if it was gender it's like "Oh, whatever then, strange". If it's sex, that's vital medical information as far as I know.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:32 PM
3

Talking loudly towards people who aren't, talking over them, etc. is not being reasonable. At least, I've never seen that solve a conflict.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:13 PM
55

Camera dude could have done it a lot better. Insulting them back so quickly only reinforces their position and makes them hostile, at which point there's no way to communicate with them effectively. He should've just talked like a reasonable person instead of talking loudly and not explaining himself.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 04:14 AM
19

They think that we are excluding people, when they are actually included by default here. They make it a point to include people because they are excluding them by default. Feminism has been themed around middle class white women for the longest time, while men's rights in almost every way has supported anybody under our umbrella by default because we fight for legal rights, which do not discriminate by race.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:06 PM
3

Got banned for saying that I hate the Jewish tradition of mutilating babies, and repeatedly said that I don't hate Jewish people. Even though half of my family is Jewish, and my dad is Jewish, apparently I'm anti-semitic for disliking a religion's customs.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:37 AM
0

I don't care what people use for pleasure. My point was that pointing out feminist hypocrisy is irrelevant when their point is meaningless anyways.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:02 PM
-14

You're the one getting upset about dildos existing lol
/r/MensRights13/06/17 11:41 PM
-29

That's what real objectification is. If you think objects that are shaped to be ideal for pleasure is objectification, you're insane.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 11:20 PM
-33

Yeah, and I'm saying that sex toys are nothing like objectifying a person like slavery.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 11:14 PM
-37

If you are bothered by a dildo and think it's comparable to a real penis, I don't even know what to say to that. Unless I'm misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 10:22 PM
2

Ahhh, that makes sense now that I read it that way. There's tons of subs that automatically ban, mostly ones run by social justice warriors.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 07:49 PM
4

I'm more surprised at the part that somebody has been banned on this sub. I don't think I've heard of anybody ever being banned here unless the person is an obvious troll or harassing people.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 07:01 PM
1

If you love somebody who abuses you and rapes you, you're an idiot and a coward. That's not a hard thing to understand lmfao. Men have had their rape reports ignored to the point where police have laughed at victims. That's not exactly something men are able to control. Also, women who are drunk are still partially responsible for endangering themselves. You think I'm going to act like it's not my fault if I'm walking down the street at 2 AM, drunk, and alone when I get robbed? No, but women see…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 11:54 PM
1

It's actually not victim blaming if they aren't victim enough to consider themselves victimized. Also, the reasons men don't report rape has been because of other people mocking them and preventing them from doing so. Women are not doing it because they choose not to.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 11:17 PM
1

No, but I don't like spineless people or cowards. If these women are reporting stupid answers like this in studies but can't report it to the police because they are worried about ruining their friends relationship when their boyfriend is a rapist, then those same women are idiots. Sorry, but I respect people with integrity, a basic level of intelligence, a shred of self-respect, that sorta thing. I don't have time to care about people, friends, or family who wouldn't have my back, so I spend no…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:45 PM
0

If somebody you rely on rapes you, that's a reason, just like if somebody abuses you but you rely on them. If somebody rapes you and you don't report it because you don't want to get them in trouble, that's something totally different. It's no different than being abused by a partner and not reporting it because you don't want them getting in trouble. It's a stupid reason.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:14 PM
0

Reason 1 is the victim's fault, so I don't see how that's a legitimate reason. "Well, he fucked me in the ass after I told him to stop and I was crying from pain, and despite being emotionally scarred, I just feel like y'know, maybe I shouldn't tell the police because he's my friend". The fuck kinda idiot calls a rapist their friend? The person who does that isn't even being silenced, but they are refusing to speak out for no reason, and they are an idiot. Reason 2 I can understand, however it's…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 09:13 PM
3

Women don't report rape for what reasons though? Men don't do it because they are mocked, shunned, shamed, and insulted, and some even deny the existence of it. "You didn't like it? Don't be a fucking faggot", "Men always like sex, just because you didn't like it doesn't mean it was rape", "Men can't be raped", "If you were hard, you weren't raped". The existence of resources for supporting male rape victims and sexual assault victims is almost nonexistent compared to what is available for women…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 02:08 PM
1

93 mph across 4 lanes sounds like pretty good reasons to assume its a murder.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 02:12 AM
37

So you're saying that she just tried to run him over and severely injure him as badly as possible with a car going 93 mph, but not kill him?
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:15 PM
5

How about this one? Terrorism noun the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, typically by Muslims, and especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. Ah yes, good old casual prejudice. Or is it discrimination? Either way, the important thing is that it's the unnecessary "pointing of the finger" that's the problem.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 06:26 PM
5

Isn't it rape because it's lying or misleading somebody in order to have sex? Or does that only apply when women are the victims.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 06:16 PM
1

If we're going to be fair, it isn't even 1/12. If Gender Based Violence is a neutral term, then the link focusing on men and boys doesn't count. So that's 0/12 for neutral results.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:13 PM
5

Look up Genital Mutilation and you'll notice something right away. Every result for the first two pages is focused on women. Not one link or article that mentioned news, arguments, or discussions of male mutilation.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:06 PM
0

I don't think the courts would allow the kid to stay with the rapist parent.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:30 PM
0

It is a baby. It's also unborn and doesn't have any rights. The woman is more important in this situation, because the violating the woman's rights means forcing her to have an abortion, which can cause emotional problems especially if the person is pro-life. The worst that could happen to the man is that he'd have a bit of his DNA in a woman somewhere without his consent, but he'd otherwise have no issues, burden, or trauma from what occurs after the rape.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:09 PM
0

If the rapist is female, do you think it's morally right to have her abort the child or carry the baby? Why should anybody, even a court of law, be able to decide what a woman should do with the baby that is inside her, even if she is a criminal? To me, that violates their right to their own body, and it's no different than cruel and unusual punishment like hoping a man gets raped in prison. If we want to maintain our "inalienable human rights" that so many people enjoy having, then we must also…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 03:25 PM
1

You know when you see a rapist on TV saying "I swear it was a mistake, I didn't do anything wrong", and you think "Wow fuck that guy, he's a rapist"? That's basically how a lot of these people see men. Regardless of what could be said, they think "He's still a man", as if the word "man" meant pedophile or criminal instead. "Not all men are bad people!" gets treated the same as if you would say "Not all criminals are bad people!" because that's just how they choose to see us as a whole.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 03:00 AM
1

It's also important to note that feminism is a subgroup of women's rights. You don't have to be a feminist to believe in equal rights, or women's rights. A lot of feminists like to say "Do you believe in equal rights? Congrats you're a feminist!" when there is nothing true about that. The term for equal rights for all is "egalitarianism". Women's rights and Men's rights focuses on the rights of that gender, and subgroups of these often include ideologies or theories that are really iffy and subj…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 02:49 AM
1

I think a simple way to put it is that women are not oppressed in almost every modern, first world culture. In places like the U.S. or most of Europe, you can compare the rights of men and women, and in almost every case women will come out with more rights than the men. Legal protections, benefits, biases, fundamental values being preserved for women while they are violated for men. In places like the middle east it would seem that there is some form of systemic discrimination and even oppressi…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:13 AM
0

If it's partly the man's baby, and the rapist has no rights over the baby because they committed rape, that would mean the man can force her to give birth to the kid or abort it at his will, does it not?
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:05 AM
0

If it was the man's baby then the man would be able to force the woman to birth the child. It is not the man's baby, sorry.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:42 PM
0

Why are you so against women having control over their own body? Men would have the right to just ditch the responsibility to the baby, and women would have the right to their own body and baby.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 03:43 PM
0

I don't think anybody, even a court of law, has the right to force somebody to get an abortion any more than they could force you to keep a baby, get a hateful tattoo removed, or other things related to that persons bodily autonomy. As much as it sucks to have somebody use your juices to reproduce, I think it would suck more if courts could force you to undergo medical procedures, especially ones as controversial as abortion. On one hand, the rapist loses the right to many of their freedoms once…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:33 PM
0

Why does it matter what the women does with the baby she is carrying? If a man is raped, he would not be responsible for the child, the rapist would be. If a woman is raped, the rapist has no say in what she does with the child.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:48 PM
0

No! Everybody should get reproductive rights. Women should have total control over the baby in their body. It's their body, their baby, their rights, their bodily autonomy. Men should have a few options depending on what the woman wants to do with the baby. If she decides to abort the baby, oh well, nothing you can do. If she decides to birth it but doesn't want it, the father should be allowed to have parental custody when it becomes possible. If she decides to birth it and she wants to keep it…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:27 PM
-1

In either case, why should I have say over what somebody else wants to do with their baby? Men should be able to drop their financial responsibility if their partner chooses to keep it, but to say "No, I don't want to be a dad, so I'm killing your baby" is just beyond fucked up to me.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:18 AM
30

Feminists have always been lurking here, but it's becoming more common that some of them make bait posts and troll posts. Not much we can do except what we always do, which is to welcome folks who are rational or trying to understand and discuss, and call out those who aren't.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:24 PM
1

So if I have sex with somebody, and I don't want them to have an abortion, I can force them to carry the baby and give birth? Am I misunderstanding or is that what you were implying? Also why would the circumstances of conception affect anything?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:07 PM
1

It's wrong to force men to be parents against their will. It's also wrong to force women to be parents against their will. Is that simple enough for you? Why does it being a rape change anything?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:04 PM
1

Mexico City has some serious technology if their cameras can differentiate between male and female asses. This only means that now we can look at women's asses even more, AND women can look at ours. Seems like a win-win.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 02:58 AM
-3

So if I rape somebody, do I get to decide if they can have an abortion? Because regardless of my offense against the woman, rape has no effect on the unborn child's right to bodily autonomy. What you are saying is that we should be allowed to force women to carry babies they don't want. That's fucked up, and that's exactly what women currently can do to men if they choose to not have an abortion.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 02:53 AM
2

Dude, did you even read the rest of OP's post? However ill admit I am getting VERY sick of feminists trying to make females better than males instead of trying to make them the same. Like, 5 seconds later...
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:12 AM
1

Africa has a ton of circumcision for both genders. For women it's more brutal, for men it's more common. In both cases they tend to use old, damaged, or even rusty tools combined with some cloth, a block of wood or a log, and something to hold the bits in position. Not very fun.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:37 PM
2

Just to add on for those who might not know, male circumcision is done for the same reasons as female circumcision. Removing pleasure, religious reasons, reducing sexual desire and promoting sexual purity, in Africa its more often about "becoming a man" or "being like your father" type reasons.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 04:51 PM
1

The callout to "gents" is because men are the ones who tend to leave the toilet seat down, and piss all over it instead of lifting it. Obviously everybody should clean any stray drops after usage, but men are the ones who can choose to just say "fuck lifting that nasty seat" and piss all over it. Maybe I just notice it more in public restrooms, but complaining about this is just idiotic.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 04:08 AM
1

Sticking a finger in your ass and feeling around is way different than lying or being wrong about a surgery being needed. I even said previously, Lying to somebody about needing a prostate exam because you want to charge them for more procedures, while I think still rape, is also a medical procedure. Sticking a finger in somebody's ass (penetrating them) because you lied to them? That's rape or sexual assault. Saying somebody needs a small surgery because you are a lying, thieving prick? That's …
/r/MensRights12/04/17 03:23 AM
1

If I lie and say you need breast reduction because your breasts are going to cause health issues, and I do it because I just want your money, is that sexual assault? No, because nothing about it is sexual or perverse or molesty or gropey or rapey. It's just a really fucked up way to commit theft and probably some type of medical malpractice. Just because tits are involved doesn't mean I'm sexually assaulting you. So now, if I tell you that your son needs to be circumcised for health reasons, is …
/r/MensRights12/04/17 02:52 AM
1

Lying to somebody to stick your finger in their ass for sexual or perverse reasons would be rape or sexual assault. Lying to somebody about needing a prostate exam because you want to charge them for more procedures, while I think still rape, is also medical procedure. Lying to somebody about needing a breast reduction surgery for their health isn't rape or sexual assault, it's just a fucked up scam or theft, as well as other things I'm sure, but there is nothing sexual about it just because it …
/r/MensRights12/04/17 12:49 AM
1

If I do a clearly unneeded prostate exam, even it it's merely to pad my bill, that counts as rape, which is a type of ... sexual assault. Yeah, because that's lying or deception to sexually penetrate somebody. Coercion, lying, manipulation, etc. count as rape. Circumcision is fucked up, but there is nothing sexual about it.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 03:18 PM
1

A medical operation isn't sexual assault. There is no reason to call it that unless you're molesting somebody with a knife, literally, for pleasure.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 03:07 AM
1

Why are you trying to compare human sexuality to plants
/r/MensRights10/04/17 04:26 PM
1

Circumcision is not sexual. Is breast surgery sexual? Is a vasectomy sexual?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:48 AM
10

I don't mean to nitpick, but Men's Rights isn't really the opposite of feminism. Feminism is an offshoot of Women's Rights which uses ideas, theories, and made up concepts. Men's Rights and Women's Rights focuses on the actual, real, provable discrimination like abortion, gay marriage, hiring discrimination, workplace and school policy, and those kinds of things. You start at the top with egalitarianism. Then there's the smaller groups like Men and Women's rights, Civil rights, LGBT rights, and …
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:12 AM
1

Sexual assault is a crime of a perverted nature. There's nothing perverted about fucked up medical operations, but there is something perverted about sucking on a babies donger.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:09 AM
1

I don't see anything sexual about circumcision. It's a medical procedure. Female genital mutilation is also not sexual assault. It's a medical procedure. It's just a really fucked up medical procedure.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:34 AM
1

I've never heard of cutting off a sexual organ as sexual assault, but either way, it's not done out or malice or hatred or for a perverse reason. It's just an idiotic medical one that isn't what people think it is.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:33 AM
1

As I said in another comment, it needs to be a crime of a sexual nature. If I punch a chick in the boob, that isn't sexual assault, it's just battery. If I grope her, molest her, or grab her, that's sexual assault. If there is no intent, there is no reason to call it sexual assault because it isn't perverse, sexual, or anything like that. If I stab a girl in the breast, that's assault with a deadly weapon. If I grab a girl and rub the edge of a knife on her breast, that's sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:16 PM
1

You're still not understanding it. It has to be a crime of a sexual nature to be sexual assault. If I molest you, that's sexual assault. If I punch a girl in the boob, that's not sexual assault, because I'm not groping, grabbing, or doing anything sexual to her. I'm just punching her in the boob.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:13 PM
1

Here is the definition. Sexual assault is SEXUAL, first of all. If I stab you in the genitals, it isn't sexual assault. If I insert a knife into your genitals in a sexual manner, that is to say, penetration with the knife as if it were a sex toy, THAT is rape. If I stab you with a knife, that isn't sexual assault. Sexual assault refers to a molestation-type crime where one person is harassing or harming somebody in a sexual manner, primarily to derive pleasure from it. Intentionally shooting som…
/r/MensRights08/04/17 05:18 PM
0

Here is the definition. Sexual assault is SEXUAL, first of all. If I stab you in the genitals, it isn't sexual assault. If I insert a knife into your genitals in a sexual manner, that is to say, penetration with the knife as if it were a sex toy, THAT is rape. If I stab you with a knife, that isn't sexual assault. Sexual assault refers to a molestation-type crime where one person is harassing or harming somebody in a sexual manner, primarily to derive pleasure from it.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 05:16 PM
0

Why is that sexual assault? There's nothing perverse about it. If you get shot in the dick, that isn't rape, now is it? Even though the bullet is penetrating you.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:42 AM
1

... No, it isn't. If I stab you with a fucking knife, that isn't rape, that's me stabbing you with a fucking knife. Stop trying to make it something it isn't. It's mutilation, assault, stabbing, anything but rape.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 02:36 AM
0

See this comment. Rape is sexual penetration, not just all violation. Otherwise, molestation would be the same as rape, which it is not.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 09:03 PM
1

No, actually it isn't. Fondling is molestation and cutting is mutilation. The definition of rape is "sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim". Have you ever heard of knife-rape? It's when somebody rapes a person with a knife. Like they literally use the knife as a dildo and rape them with it while also mutilating them.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 09:01 PM
3

It isn't rape. Stop saying it like a feminist that calls everything they don't like "rape". Molested? Maybe. Rape? No, not even close. If you think mutilation is rape, you're an idiot and you end up removing the impact and trivializing the crime of rape, which hurts actual rape victims. Stop this stupid shit. You aren't a feminist.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 01:07 PM
8

My experiences on TwoX have almost always been good. They absolutely push agendas focusing on women, and that's fine because it's a woman focused subreddit, but more often than not feminist ideas (wage gap, porn being manipulation) and things like this get downvoted. They can upvote news about 20 missing girls all they want, while ignoring boys, because they don't claim to be about egalitarianism like feminism "tries" to be.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 08:23 PM
2

Oh, absolutely. I don't defend what was said in the quote, but it'd be silly to make a comparison about war and say that women and children being raped, tortured and killed is privileged as compared to male prisoners of war being raped, tortured, killed, and experimented on. Given the choice I'm sure most people would choose to be raped instead of killed, but war is a reality, and that choice doesn't exist, so we shouldn't trivialize the suffering of some people just because others might have it…
/r/MensRights06/04/17 03:14 AM
4

To be fair, women and children still got raped and murdered in plenty of wars, but I suppose you could argue that the way prisoners of war were treated is equally bad if not worse in some cases. For example, WW2 Japan had used their prisoners for horrible experiments of any kind you can think. Civilians definitely didn't always get to survive, unless you ignore WW2, Vietnam, and a bunch of other conflicts.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 04:49 PM
7

You're using patriarchal math, that's why. You have to use "equality" math, in which 1 girl = 1,000 boys. As you can see, the 22,000 hypothetical girls is greater than 18,000 boys, so it makes sense.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 10:36 PM
1

damn it. im leaving it
/r/MensRights04/04/17 09:39 PM
1

It isn't as dramatic as you put it. The last I heard of it, women die from breast cancer most often around age 70, and men die from prostate cancer around age 76-78. If women were dying most often around age 30, 40, or even 50 perhaps there could be an argument for it.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:42 PM
11

Men are more likely to be raped. Looking at a 12 month period, 1.27 million women are raped, while 1.67 men are "raped" (though this study uses the shitty definition of rape that is classed as sexual assault, instead of genuine rape).
/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:44 PM
4

People tend to think "Well maybe the other people were a bit rude. If I just play along and try to show them when they are wrong, I probably won't get banned". They don't realize that you get banned simply because you go against the feminist ideology, not for misbehaving or being wrong.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 08:52 PM
5

It's hard to believe that they would outright ban anything sane and respectful that goes against their ideas. Even incels and red pill doesn't ban like they do, they'll just downvote you or insult you.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 11:15 PM
3

You probably could find men getting away with shitty things because they are part of the 1%, or part of royalty or a politicians family. Maybe even just because the judge is an asshole. But you won't find guys getting away with crimes, getting 4 years for murder, etc. just because they have a dick
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:50 PM
4

It isn't ragebait. It's reality, which happens to make you pissed off because of how bullshit it is when women are being let off of murdering their husbands because they have a vagina.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:42 PM
9

Actually most people aren't attacking 1.7 billion Muslims. We are attacking parts of their belief that are stupid as fuck and horrible things. What's the difference? The difference is that I can run up to a Jewish guy and call him Jewish scum to be a prejudiced, ignorant twat, or I can run up to a Jewish guy and say "Your God is a murderer, he lets people die every day, he's a cunt" and that's attacking his belief.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:58 AM
8

Literally everybody has been cattle at some point. The Irish, the Egyptians, various religious groups, the blacks, and even whites. Idiots.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:51 AM
9

It's a smart move for them. They get the power of censorship without the backlash of removing videos, and with the excuse of being advertiser friendly. The only downside is of course, that it will obviously be used as a way to promote SJW and feminist type channels and videos because nobody else will be supported or popular enough to gain traction anywhere near as much.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 12:45 AM
3

Unfortunately, not everybody can afford to spend $6500 in legal fees to "make a point" in court. There are circumcision protestors. There are documentaries on men's rights. Change doesn't just happen overnight, even women and blacks tried for decades to have their issues addressed, not even solved entirely. Sorry that most men are too busy working to fly across the country to protest for a day.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:36 PM
3

In what way do men have systematic advantages? You mean like how men have .3% of the total domestic violence shelters, the "advantage" of being arrested when they call the police for help, or like how men are twice as likely to be imprisoned and for 63% longer? I don't know of any way that men are given advantages "according to a fixed plan or system; methodical," by the definition of "systematic". The Duluth model and domestic abuse laws are systematic discrimination against men. Women being en…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 06:37 PM
15

I don't like generalizing, but when this stuff happens, and nobody bats an eye? I think there's definitely something going on here. Whether it's because bad people tend to follow eachother and group up, or if it's something about the crowd and setting, it's not really important, like I said in my other comment. I wish I knew what it was though. I don't think I've ever seen or met anybody who would do the same thing if a woman got mutilated. "I just think it's funny that he cut her clit off then …
/r/MensRights25/03/17 05:03 PM
0

You should see my comment. His cousin is just saying that we should help women before we help men, despite women having more advantages overall.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:56 PM
8

If the nobility and royalty in a kingdom is composed of mostly men, we are supposed to tell the male peasants to eat shit while we help the women become royalty and nobility? Yeah that sounds fair dude, totally not like feminist ideas of women being oppressed and needing more help despite having every advantage over men. since men are at the very top of most metrics as well as being at the very bottom with women making up the middle, society needs to figure out a better metric before the low ach…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:54 PM
20

Obviously most normal people can be trusted, but the fact that most of the audience claps makes me think that these types of psychopaths magnetize to each other and congregate. If even 10% of women clapped then that's still too much. If even one clapped, that's still too many.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:42 PM
32

"Clap if you think he should just force her to do it!" audience claps
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:36 PM
1

Again, only discrimination in some ways is counted. Things like clubs having "free drinks for women" are exceptions because of reasons I don't know it. If it was charging men more, instead of giving women discounts, it would be illegal.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:44 PM
22

Laws vary by country and state, but while it may be illegal to charge more based on gender or race, it isn't always illegal to give "extra discounts" based on gender. Even if it were, there are ways around it IIRC. Club status for example, "Oh, you're a woman? Well you are automatically welcomed into our Cafe women's club, and all club members get discounts on their purchases here". Again, many places have women's clubs or women's only hours, etc. but they may still be legally required to serve …
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:28 AM
3

Since when does male genital mutilation affect women? Is this video not about men being threatened for protesting genital mutilation? Yes, women are mutilated, but at a much smaller rate. Men are mutilated and thousands die from it every year, with hundreds in the states. Men get their genital bits hacked off with a knife and a piece of wood just like women do. If this is about who has it worse, men do, because they comprise the vast majority of genital mutilations and circumcision is almost equ…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 07:37 PM
5

Uh. It's an issue caused mostly by religion that affects only one gender*. How is that not a gender problem?
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:57 PM
92

No one in the car was properly restrained, police said. Okay, that's pretty bad. When police arrived, McClellan told them Brylee had been in a car seat and she wasn't sure who was driving, charges state. When she learned the baby had died, however, she told police she knew she and Fuller were both drunk when they got into the car, and that Fuller was the driver. Lying to police, getting into a car without a seatbelt, WHILE holding a baby, with a drunk driver? That is definitely a slap on the wri…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:54 PM
1

Hair is part of the uniform, not taking into consideration things like religious freedom and growing beards or such. But for the rest of us, hair isn't that important. If societies fashion trends say that people love suits at formal occasions, you're going to wear a suit at a formal occasion when you're a waiter or host, or working catering perhaps. Hair is replaceable, you can always get more, and if society finds shorter, lightly styled hair attractive, you're going to be wearing that to look …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:22 PM
12

But sometimes paying somebody to live in your house is mandatory.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:05 AM
-1

I compared it because the original comments statement is no better than a similar one based in race. Was yours not to say that because there are more women using men than male rapists, its okay to be make sexist comments?
/r/MensRights17/03/17 10:15 PM
-2

That's irrelevant though. Are there more blacks who are criminals or Mexicans who are lazy? Does that mean it's okay to generalize one just because one is closer to a racist stereotype than the other? Prejudice is prejudice, end of. That's it. There is no "Oh well, I know a bunch of blacks who are criminals." just the same as there is no "Oh well, I know a bunch of women who are gold diggers." because it doesn't justify being prejudiced, and sexist or racist.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:57 PM
-1

Saying hateful things towards men is by definition misandry, so yeah, if you're saying "Guys are just creepy douchebags" is definitely misandry. "Blacks are just lazy criminals" is racism. "Women just want money without working" is misogynistic. Maybe I'm misusing the terms of misandry and misogyny, but it's definitely sexist at a minimum.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:55 PM
1

I wouldn't care that much if it wasn't on this subreddit specifically. "Not all men are rapists! Stop being sexist!" gets upvoted as much as the people who say "All these women just want our money!"
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:52 PM
0

None of that is related to the original comment which essentially says that all women are just gold diggers who dont love their kids if they want custody of them.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:45 PM
4

Women want custody for one reason... male wealth Demonizing women? Check. Generalization? Check. Totally inaccurate statement? Check. The comment implies that women never want to be mothers, don't love their kids, and only want to use men for their money, yet the people in this subreddit get mad when feminists say that men just want to use women for sex, want to have power over women, etc. Anecdotal evidence is irrelevant, his subjective experience doesn't mean he can be sexist. My subjective ex…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 05:42 PM
-2

At least 13 people have upvoted that comment he made, compared to 32 on the comment calling him out. Sounds like a pretty significant amount of support for a genuinely misogynistic comment.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:19 PM
9

I don't think it's meant to be a totally accurate comparison. More so, it's to show that men still have plenty of serious issues that the government is doing nothing to fix, while women have problems with abortion rights, homeless women needing feminine hygiene products, and maybe 1-2 more things I can't think of. The picture shows that, despite men being far more screwed over, far more helpless, and lacking many basic human rights, men are still forgotten and their problems hidden away while wo…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:54 PM
29

From what I hear, female firefighters are very useful for smaller spaces, carrying kids or finding them under beds, that sorta thing. Of course, men of the same size can do the same things even better, so it's still a load of B.S.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 03:39 PM
1

Some types of FGM are worse. Some types are simply shavings of skin the size of a piece of glitter, or even a pinprick. FGM having the potential to be worse doesn't change much, and circumcision isn't exactly safe and regulated. Thousands of men and boys die each year in Africa from it. The types of FGM that are worse than MGM are actually very uncommon. None of this even matters. You can't compare the mutilation of 140 million women to the mutilation of 350 million men. It's the same violation …
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:42 PM
8

I think the best comparison would be to put it this way. Imagine we are in the 1800s, and whites are protesting, furious that they might have to now pay extra taxes simply because they have a certain amount of land which the government is calling "wasted space". Meanwhile, the black slaves are there like "Yeah, it must be terrible having that extra land and freedom", to which a white guy responds "Hey, stop trying to go against my rights! Just because you don't have all your rights doesn't mean …
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:24 AM
4

I can't tell if you mean that jokingly or not...
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:13 AM
5

That's why feminism has shut down movies like The Red Pill, helped make parental custody more favored towards women, protested for policies that incriminate men in domestic abuse situations. Ah, let's not forget all the protesting they do to get men's shelters funded! Oh wait...
/r/MensRights11/03/17 10:36 PM
0

Clearly not because they still protest against FGM far more than MGM.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 10:15 PM
8

83% of men between 15-80 I think.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 10:02 PM
2

Against female circumcision, actually. They don't care about the thousands of boys dying every year in Africa or the hundreds in the U.S.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:54 PM
18

This post is one I saved, you're welcome to check them to verify if they are legitimate, and the ones I checked did seem accurate.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 04:45 PM
20

It doesn't really matter, because when you say "Let the down votes come, but I will have my son circumcised" that establishes an attitude of "I don't care what you guys think, I'm going to mutilate my son anyways". If you actually just asked what the deal with circumcision is, you'd have gotten better answers compared to telling people you're going to mutilate your son for no reason.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 04:21 PM
9

I love how everything is about women being discriminated. "Sorry that nobody takes you seriously when you got raped, clearly it's because of woman-hating misogynists. Sorry nobody believes you when you say that you are abused. Clearly, it's misogyny". Because of course, it has nothing to do with women demanding elevated status for the last 50 years with woman-only shelters, and support programs, or anything along those lines... Certainly.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 04:09 PM
24

It's ironic how the Bible speaks against circumcision multiple times, yet these Christians do it anyways. What a bunch of idiots.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 04:03 PM
19

Cover your ears and go "La la la", throughout your life you'll wonder why people hate you.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 04:02 PM
1

Not that I know of. If we lived in the 1200-1400s and women were the majority of rulers, nobles, etc. then I think that would count. I haven't actually checked the game or seen any controversy about it outside of this single post, so I don't know if the game is actually somewhat hateful or not.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:59 PM
13

A matriarchal society doesn't say "Yeah, fuck men, they are worthless and they need to be eliminated", it just means women are the dominant gender.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 02:27 PM
3

Google "Genital Mutilation". It's depressing as fuck when you realize men aren't even one the first two pages of Google.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:44 PM
6

You realize that they aren't saying to censor free speech, right? They are saying, "Hey, let's show these people why we think they're wrong for doing this". That's called arguing or debating. They're just trying to say that we need to discourage hateful behaviour in our subreddit so that we aren't adding more hate and fuel to the fire. It doesn't make us look good when we have people who genuinely hate women or blacks or whatever other group getting upvoted here. Let me ask you, if you don't thi…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:20 PM
2

Between objectification, dehumanization, and whatever the hell else, let's just not even try to figure it out anymore because it doesn't ever make sense every time somebody gives me an example.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:22 AM
1

Yeah. But it's the internet, and none of this is really important. It's useful, but even if people lose their subreddit, the users will still hold their beliefs, and that will stay around with them to effect others in the future. The same would happen to us, or any other. We'd still have our beliefs and that's the part that would be a driving force of change in the world for every interaction we have.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:02 PM
-1

I don't think you understand the point OP was making, you just look like an idiot lmao
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:46 PM
1

Perhaps objectification is more about seeing somebody as a servant or a lesser person than you, simply there for your own interests or pleasure.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:33 PM
1

But is that really objectification? If you are looking at a sexy woman, and you say to yourself, "Man, she has a great ass, and really good contours too", is that objectification, praise, maybe sexual admiration? It isn't necessarily dehumanizing just because you are admiring the sexual attraction of a person, but I'm trying to figure out the definition because apparently everybody has a different take on it. I'd say that objectification is when it goes from admiring somebody's capability or sex…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:31 PM
2

Nice post history. They had a Faggot orgy afterward and fumbled lots of balls. Do I even need to say anything about that? You also have quite a hatred of liberals and "Libtard cucks" apparently, just more stuff painting you as a tolerant, intelligent person. You only have a deep hatred of half of the people in the country over something as silly as political belief. Ctrl+F "Cuck" 7 results on one page, yikes.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:21 PM
3

Your post is shit, see my other comment. Also, calling people cucks unironically is embarassing. Cuck originated as a fucking meme to insult people lmao
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:05 PM
1

I downvoted because it sounds like some shit out of the Red Pill subreddit. It broadcasts a generalized message of advice for men to avoid cheap whores, which has good intention, but it makes quite a lot of unfair generalizations about women entirely, not just trashy people. With a large percentage of women, they are cool with you going to the gym UNTIL...... they let themselves go to shit. As soon as she spits out a couple kids and can’t get off her cupcake binge from when she was pregnant, now…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:03 PM
14

If you didn't know, circumcision is actually about 90% bullshit, to put it bluntly. Some guy 100 years ago decided to mutilate some people's genitals to numb them and reduce the sensitivity of them in order to prevent masturbation, and as I understand it he is one reason that circumcision is popular. Other reasons include doctors being able to charge hundreds or even thousands of dollars for each circumcision, and that means a lot of profit and money. There were some studies showing that there m…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 05:37 AM
1

Lots of things are natural. Killing each other over food is natural, but we have laws against killing other people for our own groups' survival. Human life is only valued based on arbitrary and subjective instincts.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 11:55 PM
1

Why does something being human make it important? It's an arbitrary, biased way to value somethings life.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:38 PM
1

And less than a dog, pig, or dolphin.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:21 PM
1

It is possible to argue that, as the end result would be not much different than getting rid of an unborn child. But I don't know all the reasons why we consider a born child to be an independent life. I've mostly focused on why an unborn child is not an independent life. But still, there are many ways to measure a human life and so far none are good enough except to tell us "Yeah, that thing is definitely a person" or "That's definitely not a person". I think there is a transition between it th…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 01:48 AM
1

Well, we can sorta tell when something is intelligent, sentient, and self-aware. We can also sorta tell when something is not alive, sentient, and self-aware. We just don't know how or when it actually happens. There is a reason we have rough limits on when you can or cannot have an abortion. The argument of "This thing will eventually become a person" could just as easily be said about a sperm before it reaches the egg, but most people would agree that interfering with the sperm reaching the eg…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 01:28 AM
1

Well, we decide it isn't okay to kill them because they are human, not because of their intelligence. Meanwhile, we easily kill animals that are much smarter than that person, simply because they aren't humans. Some people don't want to kill animals, some people have no problem. Perhaps we just lack the technology, understanding, or techniques to decide if something is okay or not to kill. Would I want to kill a person who is nearly brain-dead and drooling? Not for no reason. But if I have to ta…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 01:00 AM
1

A cockroach responds to stimulus but we still smash them. Plants respond to stimulus too... But to answer your question, we don't know. It might just happen at some specific milestone, or it could just slowly occur over time. The problem is that we just don't understand it enough, we only know that a baby at birth can qualify as a person, but at the earlier stages of development it definitely isn't. There are many, many arguments as to why it is okay to terminate pregnancies. For example, we kno…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:46 PM
1

Murder requires something being a person. An unborn child is less of a person than my dog. My dog can listen, think, and is aware to some degree of its own existence and death. Many animals actually understand death on a basic level, an unborn human is not even aware it exists.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:32 PM
2

...Because there is no evidence that shows an early unborn child as being sentient, intelligent, etc.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:29 PM
9

An unborn child is not sentient, intelligent, conscious, or self-aware.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:33 PM
23

You need to understand that we are against forcibly mutilating a babies penis without reason. If you want to get circumcised at 14 or 18 or whenever, go ahead! But not you nor anybody else has the right to permanently change a persons life like that without their choice.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 10:18 PM
9

Do you think women who chose to help people by being doctors and nurses would be such assholes to throw their patients under the bus, though? "Sorry, I know you needed help, but I had to protest how oppressed I was working as a doctor."
/r/MensRights14/02/17 04:59 PM
2

You know there's been one common factor in all those interactions? It's you.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 04:05 PM
2

"All the women in my life have been crazy" is a totally fine thing to say, it's your personal experience. Saying that every woman is crazy to some degree is just silly, and is the same as saying "every man is a pervert to some degree", or "every man takes advantage of women in some way"
/r/MensRights10/02/17 09:10 PM
12

Generalizing women by saying that they all have episodes of insanity is not a good way to make our movement look good. You see us fight against people claiming "Men just have the desire to rape people", so why are you going to say stuff like "All women just go insane eventually"? Don't you think that you are doing the same stuff they are when you say these things?
/r/MensRights10/02/17 04:02 PM
5

"Boyfriend throws molten wax on sleeping girlfriend, gets 9 years in prison"
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:59 PM
1

I will admit that there are some studies showing that the nerve damage from circumcision is much less later in life when compared to being done as an infant. That doesn't mean we should be mutilating the genitals of babies and inflicting traumatic pain on them, though.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:56 PM
0

... Did you not pay attention in health class?
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:55 PM
5

You realize that being unable to remember the pain is different than it not being painful, correct?
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:19 PM
3

I recall hearing a statistic that about 81% of men aged 15-65 were circumcised in the U.S. "Widespread" doesn't really give the same scale when we are talking about over one hundred million men.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:13 PM
12

Because we have the miracle of modern medicine that has vigorously tested and examined foreskins, sexual organs, reports on sexual pleasure and sensitivity, and other things like that?
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:08 PM
17

That's because you have no idea how much better sex is when you aren't circumcised. There have been many studies that all agree that being uncircumcised is much better for sex and pleasure. If you were born blind, blindness is all you know.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:05 PM
3

Let's not forget that preventing pleasure is why male genital mutilation exists. John Harvey Kellogg was responsible for making circumcision popular AFAIK, when he mutilated many men and women's genitals to prevent masturbation.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:53 PM
2

I don't think it's that unfair to be honest. I live in a bit of a racist, redneck area, and there are some people in my family who are just casually racist along with a lot of people around here. It might be normal to them, but just because they're going along with everybody else doesn't mean they aren't responsible for their actions.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 06:02 PM
2

Both of those reasons, as well as the fact that it removes a large amount of sensitivity from the penis and can make sex slightly painful, require more lubrication, and can make orgasm more difficult for both the man and woman. There's a lot of hate towards it because a baby has no ability to decide if it wants its genitals permanently altered and numbed, and as somebody who was circumcised only to stop being religious when they turned 12, I (and many others) wish to have had that choice. You me…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 04:18 PM
4

That's because most men don't actually know anything about circumcision or the procedure. I would be willing to bet that if you asked 50 men who were circumcised, they would know almost nothing about the risks, the losses, and the reasons for circumcision. That aside, it doesn't change the fact that it's still a violation of basic human rights and bodily autonomy, as well as the right to a persons own life and their freedom of and from religion.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 05:13 AM
2

Some types of FGM are horribly disfiguring, and some are literally pinpricks or specks of skin being remove (the size of a hole punch or so) that are done simply as a nod to tradition (but done as minimally as possible to prevent harm). Male "circumcision" is roughly halfway ish in the severity scale compared to FGM. It does remove significant parts of the penis, however they are both done very often in places like Africa, with damaged, rusty, or unclean tools and minimal safety and sterilizatio…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 05:10 AM
2

You aren't a Christian if you are going to intentionally defy the words of the bible and harm others. If you're wrong, how do you think you're going to explain your stubbornness and willful harm of a baby to your God?
/r/MensRights01/02/17 05:04 AM
2

It is, literally by definition, mutilation.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 04:54 AM
-1

TIL /r/MensRights is full of cringey, creepy, entitled "niceguys".
/r/MensRights31/01/17 03:03 PM
11

Just because somebody serves their prison sentence doesn't mean they are all of a sudden a "reformed and changed" person when they get out. Ignoring her punishment, she still murdered, tortured, and raped a guy with two other women and her crimes will not and should never be forgotten. They should be held against her for the rest of her life, quite frankly, because they are literally the worst things you can do to a person. At no point did she back out, or try to stop it, or change her mind. She…
/r/MensRights28/01/17 09:55 PM
2

Isn't Florida the world's Florida?
/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:11 AM
6

After the massive feminist brigading to ban a movie that focuses on Men's Rights, I think we are sure as fuck justified in disliking the feminist movement. The fact that it even happened is absurd, and I know that such actions would never happen from the Men's Rights movement because we have actual issues more important than trying to interfere and harass others
/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:04 AM
2

Wait, where are you getting that she was released "for being female and a minority"? What I've heard said that she served her 27 year sentence.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 03:53 PM
5

They were so oppressed that they couldn't even clean up their signs of protest.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:28 AM
3

Age isn't just a number, it does have significance even if it is just a rough approximation of how mature or smart somebody is. We can all agree that a 9 year old saying they want to fuck a 40 year old isn't good, because we know that a 9 year old isn't capable of the reasoning or foresight of somebody in their 20s or even teens. And I do agree that there are some 43 year olds who are utterly idiotic and some 13 year olds who are probably smarter than them. But those cases are extremely rare. If…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:52 PM
13

Obviously the true victims of oppression and discrimination are the ones who can afford two plane tickets across the country to protest for a single day about how oppressed they are.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:40 PM
7

So you think that a 13 year old is capable of the foresight, consideration, and responsibility of drinking alcohol or using a highly addictive narcotic?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:48 PM
8

You could just as easily argue that a 13 year old smoking or drinking has no victim, so why is it illegal? Because they don't have the responsibility or intelligence to handle the consequences, and they barely understand those consequences and the risk involved.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:01 PM
4

Not just a teen either, a child barely into puberty.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:54 PM
6

Many underaged teens go after older (20s) people, and they usually are either predatory or into fucking immature girls. Most normal people will be driven away by somebody who is 13-16, immature, irresponsible, etc. relative to a person around their own age (20s) so while yes, an underaged person may want to fuck an older one, that doesn't mean that the older person is not manipulating them, grooming them, etc. as I have personally seen a few of my former friends be used and manipulated in that w…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:53 PM
2

One could just as easily argue that killing even one innocent man (the real number is about 2% of death row inmates being innocent) due to our unwillingness to pay for killers makes us wrong in having the death sentence. How much money would you be willing to spend on murderers and rapists jail in order to save the lives of dozens, hundreds, or maybe thousands of men? $500,000 a year? $5,000,000? Is it even allowable to put a price on the life of an innocent man? I would be willing to bet that t…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:43 AM
2

It was an outright attack on feminism, which is comprised of women AND men. I think you are looking too far into it if you think that there is any implied attack on the women's march, instead of him just posting it because he saw the women's march going on, and that compelled him to poke fun at one type of feminism with the idea of a men's march. "Manspreading" is because many men find that their genitals have too much pressure put on them when they sit closed-legged. As well, many women do what…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 01:36 PM
3

No, it's absolutely not a coincidence. His whole point was to say that, since women are marching for their issues like abortion rights (and other stuff, I don't know), a men's march would be more focused on getting rid of the man-hating type of "rabid feminism" that has started to pop up lately. We've all seen the racist MTV video which has feminism-based principles, and things like the term manspreading or mansplaining even existing stem from that same hateful type of feminism that he is referr…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 05:06 AM
3

Okay, but nobody has said the women's march is about rabid feminism. Piers Morgan's comment was that he wanted a men's march against rabid feminism, he didn't call the women's march "rabid feminism". Nobody here is attacking the women's march, I have no idea how you got that idea.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 03:34 AM
3

Nobody said anything about the woman's march though? This is about "Rabid feminism" causing issues with men and men's rights... Piers Morgan's comment didn't even say that the womens' march was about feminism. He simply said that he wants a Men's March to protest rabid feminism. I don't understand where this miscommunication came from, but I have no care about the women's march since they are not big issues in my personal opinion. Are you disagreeing that many "rabid feminists" are man-hating, m…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:14 AM
-11

I think they absolutely can, if their objectives revolve around enslaving men to do the shit work and to enable women to reap the same benefits without the work.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 08:06 PM
1

Wait, does going to prison for failing to pay automatically waive the child support that you owe? Couldn't they just seize all your assets and basically leave you totally empty and homeless?
/r/MensRights17/01/17 04:44 PM
2

In the jungle some animals fuck eachother then die, murder the other, or mate for life.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 03:40 PM
2

Yeah but hitting yourself with a bottle is really really fun, especially those big ones. Everybody knows this, women are just missing out.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 04:21 PM
1

We absolutely can, but this study clearly shows that some people still have the conscious belief that came about from the natural instinct of preserving women. Hence why the original comment was mentioning that it made sense biologically to have that instinct and why it existed, and also mentioned that we didn't need it any more.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 04:09 PM
2

We don't act just on instinct, but we do still have them and they are from thousands or millions of years of evolution...
/r/MensRights13/01/17 09:03 PM
5

I think it absolutely deserved to, but mostly because of the part that it was a reboot. It felt like it was simply copying scenes and ideas straight from the original movie(s), which I think is a horrible way to do it. Compare that to the Judge Dredd reboot, Dredd. It was much more it's own movie, and it was great.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:42 PM
1

So... Who is saying that something is morally wrong because it's unnatural, or right because it's natural? We have instincts that tell us men should be sacrificed for women, but not instincts that tell us to rape women to reproduce. This is something we know is true.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 04:52 PM
0

They were adding information to the point the OP was making, which was that men are sacrificed more than women in these experiments. Their point was that nature and biology encourages male disposability in humans, while females are less disposable in nature. They focused on the fact that a female is much more important to reproduction than a male, which is why nature deems them less disposable. One male can make 3 babies with 3 females, but one female can only have one pregnancy with 3 males. I …
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:17 AM
0

I have no idea what point you were making by bringing up the rape thing, in response to the other person mentioning the biological reasoning for the OP's finding. Just confused, that's all.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 01:37 AM
5

It's probably anecdotal evidence, but I (and some others) share that same experience. I (used to) know two or three people who were totally fine, and even supportive of male genital mutilation without having any good reason. They argued that it was religious rights, that it wasn't that bad for men so it didn't matter, and that men who were cut wouldn't know the difference so that it didn't matter. All of which were just failed backup arguments because they couldn't explain why violating a baby b…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 10:50 PM
8

Animals probably rape eachother pretty often, and it absolutely is a useful way for one animal to reproduce. Of course, we as humans know that it's a morally wrong thing to do. But why is rape even relevant to the point that he made? Why bring it up?
/r/MensRights12/01/17 10:42 PM
4

Not to try to shit on religion, but I feel like Feminism has become just like them. Just as with Christianity or Islam, or probably other religions, people tend to pick and choose what parts to believe. Your average Christian is probably totally into the whole not murdering commandment, and the parts about not lying to your parents, but when it comes to things like abstinence they will just "leave that part out", or the part where homosexuality is evil. Also that part about whipping your kids...…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:27 PM
3

One possibility would be that men are generally more determined when it comes to violent things, whether due to biology or social/cultural reasons, I don't know. Men are more likely to kill themselves using violent methods, and men are way more likely to be getting into fights (whether planned or being jumped by other guys). It could also be that men might be prone to more violent acts when they have mental illnesses, as looking at a list of school shootings seems to show quite a significant amo…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 03:59 PM
13

Actually, you did say such a thing, if you need a little reminder. I support women/children's only shelters because most of the time these women and children are hiding from an abusive spouse that is searching for them. The keyword there is "most" of the time. Statistically, men are 70% of one-way domestic abuse victims. That isn't "mostly" women, that's almost 3 out of 4 victims being men. Around or over 99% of domestic violence shelters are for women. Unless you honestly believe that less than…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 04:47 AM
1

Why must they always target men in a biased way, instead of a more reasonable one? From the description, "Family Violence stems from men who think they are better than women. It’s that simple." The idea of gender-targeted DV ads aren't the issue, but them painting the issue as one-sided is. I don't think that many people would complain if we had some ads that targeted men, and other ads that targeted women.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 04:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter