TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tadpole_Jackson Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by Tadpole_Jackson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Not that I disagree but I feel the same way about the 76% of women that say the same. The article is curiously missing the sample size and demographic, though.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 05:13 PM
0

PS: LOL @ the first comment 'marriage counselling'. If that solved anything divorce rate wouldn't be nearly 50%. This statistic doesn't really mean very much. The divorce rate is nearly 50% because of people who serial divorce. That statistic doesn't differentiate between first divorces and those that get divorced, and remarry, then divorce, and remarry ad nauseum. There are a lot of marriages that work out just fine, but there are also a lot of people, both male and female, that get divorced se…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 04:59 PM
2

Thanks for your response. I don't often get to see the other POV of this issue without the discussion dissolve into insult slinging and yelling.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 04:47 PM
1

They can dump their bonds on the open market, causing the value to plummet and the interest rate to spike and further suppress demand during a bond auction. I'm honestly not following the logic here. The interest rate on bonds is set. You don't get more or less money from a bond as inflation goes up and down. You get a percentage return that is set at the time of purchase. The era of the dollar as the world's reserve currency is starting to fade, and countries are starting to move away from the …
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 12:35 AM
1

When the debtors come they don't have to print at all. They just sell more bonds. Companies, banks, investors, US citizens, and foreign citizens are always eager for a guaranteed return. There is no shortage of those willing to buy. And federal income taxes are used to cover the interest over the entire life of the bond. It rolls over because they are essentially swapping debt from one place to another. There really is no danger unless, for some far out reason, everyone stops buying bonds. It is…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 08:30 PM
1

I don't know but there are two parts to this statistic that are important for calculating potential inflation. You are forgetting to take into account how much they are removing from the economy on a yearly basis. Considering we aren't experiencing hyperinflation (I would say that the current inflation rate is fairly healthy), I'd say that it's not that much of an offset but I don't know the exact stats. Do you?
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 07:04 PM
9

Zimbabwe went bankrupt because Mugabe put people with no farming experience in charge of managing farms which, due to lack of experience, caused the farms to produce very poor yields. This meant they could no longer provide enough food for the people. In response, Mugabe printed large amounts of bank notes to combat the rising food prices. This devalued their currency significantly. It went bankrupt because of hyperinflation, not national debt.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 06:44 PM
5

The only thing wrong with this argument is that you're assuming that government debt is like household debt. Which it is not. Goverenment debt never really needs to be paid off. It can be rolled over indefinitely if need be. When bonds are due, more bonds can be created to pay them off. We are not in danger of running out of money to pay this debt so long as people keep buying government bonds. Which they are. Many countries have a vested interest in it. Many private citizens like the security o…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 04:21 PM
1

Those same people will, honestly, just dismiss any bible quote. Which, to be fair, really is just an appeal to authority fallacy. Especially if you don't believe in Christianity.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 02:06 PM
1

I'm not quite sure you understand what freedom of speech/expression is. They aren't stopping you from saying anything. At all. That freedom doesn't give the speaker/expresser immunity to the consequences, criticisms, or ridicule of the statement or expression from anyone that may or may not disagree.. You aren't being jailed for what you're saying or expressing. Which means your freedom of speech isn't being trampled on in the slightest. That's all that the amendment protects you from: Being imp…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 03:11 AM
0

I had nothing when I started. A part time job is all you need and a strict budget that makes you save enough money each semester. I paid it completely with the money I made making $8\hour.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 08:03 PM
1

You're arguing a false dichotomy. You do have another option - pay for most of it in cash at a publicly funded state school and commute daily. It's not hard to do. I'm only $5k in debt making $80k/year 3 years out of college with a computer science degree. I have more money than I know what to do with and I was an average student. And I live in a luxury apartment by myself paying $1200 per month in rent alone. Don't knock the system because you didn't do research before entering and tried to pay…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 07:41 PM
1

Not everyone that challenges your claims is a troll. Me being one of them. And just because you lost the argument doesn't mean you should call the other person names. It just makes you look like a sore loser.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 11:19 PM
1

Nope. It's ad hominem. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 10:44 PM
1

Ad hominem. I asked for evidence because without it an argument means nothing.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 10:34 PM
1

I was defining the word because you said I used it wrong. I was proving how I didn't. Yet you have not proven anything yet. Just spouting ad hominem and fallacy fallacy arguments.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 10:10 PM
1

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 10:00 PM
1

Do you have any proof that, in general, and in large quantities that professors are no longer teaching backs and theories and scientific principles. And instead push a radical political agenda.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 09:16 PM
1

I'm not sure where the confusion is. I asked how the liberal arts and academia are influenced by the liberal political agenda. What am I missing?
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 09:11 PM
0

That would be because the word has several definitions, all correct. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/liberal?q=liberal Notice the one denoting the definition when referring to education. That would be the one I was using. I was not using the one labeled "In a political context". Those classes you mentioned fall under the category of liberal arts. If you get a degree in them you have a degree in the liberal arts. I'm really beginning questioning your authority and…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 08:53 PM
1

Ok, then please describe how it works and how this leads to political bias in published studies that somehow will stand up to peer review. Oh, and provide proof, of course.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 08:42 PM
1

I'm pretty sure academia studies whatever the professor wants and has no real connection to politics. And they publish their results for others to emulate so that it can face scientific scrutiny.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 08:30 PM
1

Can you please describe what political agenda academia has and why? I'm having a hard time figuring out what they could gain from the courses you've selected. If anything it is just like many other liberal arts course, lots of studies and term papers based on prior works.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 08:27 PM
-6

I think it has a lot to do with the family's fairly recent history with being kinda racist.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 08:07 PM
1

How do you know it's the truth? There's a lot of talk about this on this sub and I have not exactly seen any scientific studies to back up the claims being posted.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 02:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter