TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tai9ch Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by Tai9ch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

No, unless as a very temporary measure to create outrage and eliminate compulsory public service entirely. Enforcing equality by dragging people down and violating their rights makes the world worse.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 10:34 AM
3

I bet that last factor is more significant than the first two right now, although factor #2 is likely to catch up.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 04:48 PM
-6

they'd have to find a real job. Any job that pays well is a real job by definition.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 04:47 PM
3

Institutions are a mechanism to disperse accountability.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 09:48 PM
2

Absolutely, but... Try very hard to avoid making your personal identity depend on any group labels. A term like "MRA" is a bundle of positions that you should carefully evaluate separately and figure out what you actually agree with and are willing to spend effort to support. Further, movements and labels shift over time, and just because you mostly agree with some group now doesn't mean that you should in a few years. There are people who were Feminist in 1980 who still consider themselves Femi…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:35 PM
-1

I'll support women's right to choose, as much as they support men's right to choose. Tit for tat is a deterrence strategy. It makes no sense if you're trying to gain things.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:47 PM
1

No. The draft is bad. Making more people suffer makes it worse. That's like suggesting that because some people pay unjust child support it would be more fair if everyone had to pay unjust child support. Or that because cops shoot some people's dogs they should instead shoot everyone's dog. Registration for the draft is unjust. It needs to be abolished. Full stop.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 05:18 PM
0

Currently 50% of the adult the population has to sign up to be added to the list. Plenty of people have suggested increasing that to 100%, which would be worse.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:32 PM
-12

Draft is not getting abolished anytime soon, so we need to draft women. The response to something bad happening should never be to make it happen to more people. That's the sort of nonsense you get from "privilege" narratives, and frankly the results are straight up evil. The one single exception is to push for something like the universal extension of the draft as a ploy to try to get more support a universal repeal, but even then the risk of a bad outcome is significant enough to make the mora…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 07:00 PM
4

"Ally" is a mutual relationship. If you're not my ally, prepared to support me on my issues, then I'm not your ally. And yes, that means I'm not your ally just because you're a member of some class of people - any class of people.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 03:17 PM
4

I'd certainly take that over getting my long hair stuck in a lathe or mill gear. Historical factories aren't the place to look for drastic sex differences in workplace injuries. Remember that the whole US Northeast economy ran on "factory girls" for like 100 years, and 1850-1950 wasn't exactly the peak of workplace safety.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 01:12 AM
6

Those jobs only existed because of greed anyway. Seriously? How the hell else were they going to make that stuff before modern machinery was introduced?
/r/MensRights31/05/22 01:07 AM
3

I'm not currently working in the area, and it's hard to come up with any good criticisms of medicine right now that don't run straight into the political mess that is the COVID-19 pandemic, but here's a link to a news article with some pointers that might be worth searching further on: https://phys.org/news/2018-07-beware-scientific-studiesmost-wrong.html
/r/MensRights15/05/22 10:43 PM
2

That's cool. I suggest reading some medical papers by actual medical people - you'll be immediately horrified by the fact that they clearly don't even know what the preconditions are for the statistical tests they're using, much less why preregistering a study might be an ethical concern.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 10:25 PM
2

Having conducted and published such research. I'm going to have to doubt on that one. If you were actually involved in modern medical research you'd be aware of all the ways that the outputs are horribly biased. I mean, most people can't even manage to pre-register studies, and half the ones who do can't even manage to stick with the outcomes that they registered.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 10:17 PM
9

The day we start massaging medical data to fit political narratives will be a very sad one. What makes you think that day is in the future? What makes you think that day was after you were born?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 09:26 PM
0

You make two potentially conflicting statements here: That is not a right he is capable of exercising as a baby. My rights are worth protecting, regardless of what you say. I understand your reasoning for thinking these two statements are consistent. If making a judgement call here were up to me, I would draw the same conclusion. But that's a value judgement that's inconsistent with the values that some people legitimately and honestly hold. The liberal value of religious tolerance, which is a s…
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:41 PM
0

Because for everyone making your argument so strongly, there's an adult male who will vehemently defend his right to have been brought up in his faith, which includes a requirement of infant circumcision. Sometimes rights conflict. And I'm sorry, but I'm not going to support using my tax dollars to, by force and violence, end a well established cultural tradition that's literally older than recorded history.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:20 PM
0

They absolutely do, and what your parents did to you was terrible. But I can't support sending in men with guns to have stopped your parents. The liberal values I support say that an individual should make their own choices when possible. That's not possible for an infant, so those choices go to the parents rather than to the state unless the circumstances are truly abnormal and extreme. Unfortunately, the Jewish tradition of circumcision is so well established that even if I might agree that it…
/r/MensRights06/04/22 09:54 PM
-2

Keep in mind that when you take a decision away from parents you're not necessarily giving it to the child. And no, in the case of religious circumcision saying that they can chose when they're an adult is bad analysis. The question at hand here is whether or not the child will be raised in strict adherence to Jewish customs. So the question here when we try to generalize and understand why the liberal tradition might encourage a strict standard of parental choice on religious issues is what's t…
/r/MensRights06/04/22 01:43 PM
-5

The majority of circumcision is performed separately from religion. I'm aware of that fact, and of the history. If the question were about a ban on routine circumcisions in hospitals, or about a mandate for a formal written declaration of religious / strong personal (family) belief then I'd be all for it. But when you propose a hard ban on circumcision, you need to reckon with what that actually means. That means rounding up orthodox Jews and Muslims and throwing them in prison. How about we don…
/r/MensRights06/04/22 01:40 AM
-10

Those things are absolutely comparable, and therefore to see why they both are and should be treated differently you need to actually compare them. To broadly simplify: No major world religion broadly requires it. In many cases it's much more harmful to the subject than commonly practiced male circumcision. That being said, there are some very mild forms of symbolic female genital cutting that almost certainly be ruled legally protected religious practice in the US if a test case were to occur.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 01:32 AM
-17

Because, after centuries of extremely hard won cultural experience, our society values religious tolerance and parental rights. Saying that you know better and your opinion should override other people's opinion is easy and dangerous. It doesn't matter if you're right about this particular thing. It matters that society may be wrong about something else that's even more important. And it matters that religious oppression is really dangerous. To be clear, I'm an atheist who vehemently opposes cir…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 10:31 PM
3

Unfortunately, the Marxist structure that all of these oppression studies fields follow includes a built in multi-layered motte-and-bailey that prevents any rhetorical knock-out blows. It doesn't matter what you show about "the patriarchy", or what statistics you have, or even what facts you have. For Feminism, they're very clearly just following the Marxist pattern (the oppressed are women, the structure of oppression that needs to be overthrown is the patriarchy, etc). The academic literature …
/r/MensRights05/04/22 09:55 PM
-10

Let's be absolutely clear here: Isolated symbolic violence is categorically different from violence intended to seriously hurt someone and should be treated differently. Whether or not people should be slapping each other over honor violations in 2022, Chris Rock is correct to not be pushing for charges to be pressed and the police are correct to not be pressing charges unilaterally.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:29 PM
1

This isn't necessary with good teachers. You should only consider this strategy when you specifically identify a bad teacher.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 04:23 PM
-6

Life isn't fair. Conscription is bullshit. But conscription to defend from an actual invasion is less bullshit than some other cases. Further, having literally every adult fight makes less sense than trying to make sure that children keep at least one of their parents. And the tradition of having the men do the fighting probably concretely works better than doing it the other way or having some other arbitrary selection criteria. But... single Ukrainian women will deserve dirty looks for complai…
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:20 AM
3

One of these two is not like the other. And I'm not talking about the folding stock.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:14 AM
6

There's nothing wrong with child support. These legal scholars disagree. They have arguments in favor of their position, which you completely ignored to post your single sentence opinion.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:30 PM
7

Trying to suppress all humor and references to violence is absolute bullshit. There's a real issue with social norms around women being violent to men, but trying to change fiction over it is crazy.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 12:20 PM
5

More applicants from men, yet women had almost a 2/3 majority. Saddest part was the official updated HR strategy was to especially target hiring more women. More people need to leak this to the applicants. This should be a really easy lawsuit.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 07:05 PM
1

When you have a clear problem that's common across a broad segment of the population, talking about "individual choices" is a waste of time. That's just trying to assign blame, which is useless because it'll never fix the problem. You've identified a couple aspects of the problem: Single parent households and people becoming criminals. In our current society, reducing the number of criminals is trivial. Just make some of the stuff that currently make people criminals not be crimes. Maybe legaliz…
/r/MensRights24/06/20 03:15 AM
1

This is the sort of situation where it's worth pushing the issue. Failing a student for reasons that are purely political or sexist is pretty hard to justify.
/r/MensRights10/05/20 02:45 AM
2

This is the exact opposite of what you're portraying. In studying the "girls are pushed out of math" hypothesis, they discovered something that was inconsistent with that hypothesis. Specifically, that girls self-select out of STEM fields because they have a relative advantage in other fields based on school performance. This leads them to a possible intervention: Help boys be do better in non-STEM classes in k-12. That's great. That's a problem that we knew about, and it's excellent that they d…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 07:02 PM
10

Extreme gender gaps in some fields can have concrete social disadvantages. For example, the gender gap in k-8 education can mean that students (both boys and girls) don't see any male teachers until they hit high school, and then it's just one math teacher. The expenditure of some resources to try to push male k-8 teachers up to, say, 20% might end up being a good deal. The same logic applies in a lot of areas. For example, only like 10% of the people in some engineering fields are women. That p…
/r/MensRights27/11/19 04:04 PM
-7

There are two people standing, and it's likely that they chose to stand. The seat next to her feet is open. I don't see a problem here.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:28 AM
5

Making everyone a criminal means less effective enforcement on the crimes that matter (e.g. mass shootings).
/r/MensRights09/08/19 04:42 PM
5

You're going a bit narrow with "doctor, lawyer, or engineer". Just randomly going to college and getting a crap degree is still a good deal if you can afford it and are interested in desk jobs.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 07:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter