TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Taicoi04 Archive

View 1 post and 67 comments by Taicoi04 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

DiscussionTaicoi04/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:21 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No I would rather not be killed or led to suicide through unfair treatment, and have my life be just a statistic thank you very much. I was taught by my primary school teacher " In America, people value children first, then women, then pets, then men".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 06:09 PM
4

Yes they are . I'm not talking about the Middle East or Africa. In developed countries, women are very protected from rape. Much more than men are protected from murder, war, suicide or assaults. Even rape , sure , there are more females victims of rape but those victims will receive much more care compared to a male victim of rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:31 PM
5

I think that only applies to modern times. Human rights weren't a thing. Depending on how civilised your society is , I don't think it'll stop at the emotional outburst.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:25 PM
2

Society implies "kill yourself, sacrifice" It is so true , it's very okay when men die or pushed to the edge of death because no one gives a shit. In the past , at least there was a balance between the value of women and men. Modern society has greatly diminished the needs for men which give us no tangible values compared to a woman . At this point, it's just our biology not catching up to modern society. The only way I think we can get out of this is by a great culture and civil reform aimed at…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:21 PM
1

Yeah yeah sure. Guess just leave the rest of the argument out the window? Why don't you address the rest of my point? I guess men getting killed and pushed to suicide constantly doesn't fucking matter because they aren't subjected to rape as often . So address the rest of my point, the rest of it. If the way that society are treating men are constantly pushing them to death, how is that not terrible? As I said , rape are terrible but women are much more protected to it compared to men . Men aren…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:00 PM
8

In the past women were treated like shit sure, but everyone was treated like shit. The fact that people thought men had better lives proves further that no one gives a shit about men's problem back in the days. Successful men tend to live the best lives in society, but unsuccessful men will certainly live the worst , and there will always be 10x more unsuccessful men compared to the successful ones. Even though, to be fair, men's physical strength did protect them from a lot of the danger from t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:20 PM
1

If an experience is almost unique to you, you can overplay it however you want as no one will be able to disprove it without sounding rude. Men die at higher rates , suicide at a higher rates , get beaten up at higher rates,... I don't mean individually but combined. If you're a man you'll be more isolated and not get the benefit of favouritism, and get treated as disposable by society, your words unless you're a very successful man will hold zero value compared to a woman,... Those are all kind…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:10 PM
-2

How about death, or beaten up? And isolated and no favouritism,.. soon enough it'll surpass that on the suffering scale. Men live in fear too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:52 PM
6

I'd say it's still slightly in favour of women though. At least in the east Asian countries
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:49 PM
1

Things is. Only a small percentage can be winner whilst the rest loses.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 09:00 AM
1

Wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 08:11 AM
3

Would be nice until you're the nails with no faults of your own. If you follow this logic then people who beat the first few women to death for fighting for women's rights are morally correct
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 02:17 PM
2

yes, maybe not western men where their sex drive are so crazy that they need sex once a week or they go to hookahs. My gf aren't the prettiest, aren't the cutest or sexiest in fact I'd say i don't feel much sexual attraction towards her but she's so caring, smart and she loves me for who I am. And that alone already made me the happiest man in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 05:47 AM
–

Is there a reason to why you're asking this?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 10:12 AM
–

Just use prostitutes instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 07:19 AM
–

Isn't related to my comment at all
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 07:16 AM
–

Why wouldn't you date a prostitute? Are you a misogynist? You support prostitutes yet refuses to date then?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 05:59 AM
–

Sex workers, a disgusting word
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 05:57 AM
–

Make it sounds like it's men's fault for not getting sex. You fuckers are born with a pussy, that's all. You literally get sex more easily because you have the unfair advantage of being born with a pussy. Which I say is fair enough, but power comes with responsibility. If you do things that reinforce inequality, what you'll get back is even more inequality. So don't be surprised when whores are hated. We have more than enough money to buy whores, but what we want in life is a wife, not a whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 05:55 AM
–

Yes we do. That's why we hate whores. The more whores there are, the less people out there which are fit for marriage and love. They whore themselves out because of their own decisions, thus they takes the consequences of their own decisions
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 05:47 AM
1

Yeah shits. Truth hurts man 🤕
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 05:30 PM
1

Yeah. Also, Red piller are fkin stupid. The only way we can balance the power dynamic between women and undesirable men is for the undesirable men to come together, assisting each other to increase our collective strength. Yet they don't do that .
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 08:03 AM
1

Yeah this is based to much on assumptions. Men who support aren't the ones saying that women should pursue. Those are two contradicting opinions but men would in general, only agree with one of two.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 09:53 AM
1

What men do amongst ourselves is the direct result of what women want. If in general, women are only attracted to rich guys, we will have to compete to be rich to get women. If women like a strong, dominant man, we'll have to compete within ourselves to be the dominant man. Hope that answers the question
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 09:45 AM
3

They can just because they are in the power-dynamic in which they are allowed to be shitty and still get applause and attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 09:39 AM
1

So that
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 10:05 AM
4

Well, just give it a few more generations, women like you will be naturally removed from the gene pool anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 08:55 AM
11

Tell that to women when they fought for their equality. But now when it's our turn to fight for equality then suddenly "it wouldn't help". Accepting our fate as sub human wouldn't help either.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 02:39 AM
0

The worker didn't roll over when we were oppressed by the rich. Revolutions have always happened when a huge number of people are treated unfairly by society. We are the same, if we are oppressed, we must fight back, never accept your fate, that's how they win. The under privileged must team up and rise up against oppression. Don't listen to them saying you must accept your fate, instead you should try to change it. Equality only happens to those who fight for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 01:53 AM
6

You don't notice it because it doesn't negatively affect you
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 01:44 AM
10

Sad my fucking ass. Yeah lucky for you you're privileged and will never have to get off your high horses. You wouldn't survive a single day in our shoes
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 01:42 AM
1

All Im asking is how much use must we provide. What can we do to be perceived as equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 11:17 PM
2

You sure as hell are facing the difficulty of an average man. But hey, you seem like a decent person and your criteria are very reasonable. Just follow basic dating guides (the ones for dudes) since you know, same difficulty, same tactics 😂. You'll find someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 10:31 PM
1

Yeah. Finding someone attractive=\= wanting a relationship with one. Im just saying, women can still be attractive even with age.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 09:57 PM
1

Well, dating generally get more difficult with age anyway. Not because of dating value or whatever but it's just the fact that more people around your age would have been married or settled down to a relationship anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 09:34 PM
0

That fking suck for sure. Tbh until this thread, i never thought age a serious problem for women. But I guess there are plenty of things women can do to keep their dating values even as they grow older. I mean, I'm confidently a 20 yo slightly above average dude but I'd have no problem seeing a 30-35 yo woman attractive given that she has good values, are kind and didn't go through a "hoe phase". I never cared much for looks but my body count standard is higher ( as in lower body count) than ave…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 09:29 PM
1

Good to hear an honest opinion. Yeah I guess what you are describing is fairly reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 09:17 PM
0

Don't money also fall under the category of "success" tho?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:54 PM
6

Yeah, guess i haven't taken age into consideration. I guess the equivalent dating value of a 20 yo dude would probably be a 35yo woman
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:53 PM
4

Yeah no way. That dude sexy af and I think you're over exaggerating the money an average woman could get on OF.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:49 PM
13

Yeah that's not true 😂. Fucking hope it was though
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:44 PM
4

Good question. Probably romantic? And yeah, I'm just trying to figure where that position is under the Chadly man to have the same romantic options compared to an average woman. Probably top 30%-ish?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:39 PM
2

Yeah talking to dumb people make you emotional for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 08:00 AM
1

Totally not in the same league, he could beat them all up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 07:37 AM
15

Before you hit the wall, that's the point. Being disingenuous only prove your point wrong. Dumbass
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 07:35 AM
–

Yeah I was just talking about a dumbass.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:46 AM
–

Aww, a young chick stole your man? Boo hoo, men have it 10 times worse than you, sit down . You had your time to be a nice girl, if you were then maybe a good guy would have stayed with you. Sorry madam but only terrible women fear the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:27 AM
2

You idea of an average guy is probably 6 figures, 6ft, 6 packs under some fat and socially well versed. But no, that's only one out of 20 men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 05:29 AM
1

That's oddly specific
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 04:39 AM
1

Wtf is this
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:40 AM
1

Yeah, that would work, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 12:49 PM
3

Maybe apart from you, I strongly believe that everyone would believe that lying with bad intent is indeed immoral. Imagine someone hide away a fact that would obviously be a huge deal breaker from you and imagine living with that person your whole life because of their lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 12:48 PM
0

Yes because when men point out that life is unfair to them, then it's because it's their fault they're not good enough, not because it's actually unfair to them right? You know the reason you can say that is because you know that inherently men are less valuable and they don't deserve to have the privilege of a woman, whilst still preaching gender equality. Your slander is worthless since it doesn't point out anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 10:01 AM
6

I wouldn't want a partner who would lie to me. That is objectively immoral. I don't think any men should compromise their values based on a sinking cost fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 09:36 AM
1

If you don’t agree with persuading, cajoling or pressuring people to do something then you’re just disagreeing with the very concept of society. Companies using advertisements to push a certain products. Government use the law to reward and punish certain behaviors. Society already doesn’t work without some sort of control . Men for example are pressured all the time to make money, to be more masculine, to be a certain way,… to even get a chance to have a partner. So how does it make pushing cer…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 03:59 PM
1

There’s many ways to push something onto people without it being forced or coercion. We can totally have a society that rewards monogamous living style more than other. It wouldn’t be absolute but the more monogamy is supported, the more healthy the society is going to be. And pressuring, cajoling or persuading someone into something that is designed to make a more stable society is something that is totally reasonable and moral. They don’t need to if they don’t want it, but society can make it …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 04:50 AM
0

I’m sorry but you just don’t understand the bottom of the problem. I don’t advocate for women to love who they don’t want to. I know it’s doesn’t matter if it’s unfair to men because they are always on average less desirable than the average woman. And I know that women aren’t just going to willingly lower their standards no matter that they even deserve it or not. What I’m suggesting is monogamy. That way, no woman have to compromise their standards and men would still be able to find partners …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 02:31 AM
0

Nope , not implying anything. Just take the information how you like
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 12:56 PM
-3

And what happens when a vast majority of women only like a small minority of men? How do you think that could turn out for society. Do we go back to Islam or the time of Genghis Khan where one man share multiple wives and the rest of the men are worthless or dead? Humanity have pushed equality for a reason. If women doesn’t want to help men’s interest then they don’t deserve for their interest to be met either and rightly so. Where do you think these hateful redpill bros are created? Resentment,…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 02:52 AM
0

Not here to argue with your experience and standards but at least I want you know what it’s like for the dude. If a woman keep on insisting the only that can make the relationship work is physical attraction, you’re basing your and your partner’s relationship on something outside of your or his control. And that feels absolutely powerless for the man, unfair even, that there’s absolutely nothing they can do can change the woman’s mind because of the lack of the arbitrary “spark”.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 02:36 AM
1

It’s not our fault. If a man stay a virgin then expecting a virgin wife is totally fair. You act like women can’t choose when to lose their virginity. You chose to lose your virginity, the consequences are totally on you. It’s unlike like women choosing men based on height( cannot be controlled), money(largely can’t be controlled) or looks(the same with money). This issue can be easily fixed by just choosing to have sex after marriage but nooooo….
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 01:00 AM
3

Still greatlyy lower than someone who f around. You literally can’t deny that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 12:52 AM
2

Healthy or not is up to individual interpretation What i care about is fairness for society. What you suggest is a woman’s desire is more important than a man’s desire. You can have your personal opinion if you want but objectively, when a big portion of society desire is not met because they’re treated unfairly against, trouble arises. I don’t argue what YOU care about, I only discuss what is moral and fair. And the consequences for immorality and unfairness is immorality and unfairness. That’s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 03:12 AM
10

1st of all. Pedophilia is not the same as wanting a virgin woman. Get that thought out of the way Secondly, it’s sinking-boat fallacies. Men shouldn’t have to accept a relationship that’s unfair for them, even if the opposite is unlikely.If a man is a virgin himself , he has every moral rights to want a virgin woman, it’s fair. And virginity is not mutually exclusive with emotional attachment. In fact, they compliment each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 02:51 AM
10

“Men are not shamed for being virgin” proceed to use virgin as an insult It’s not directed at you individually, just the side that claims it doesn’t happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 02:36 AM
10

Why is it a problem? Isn’t it the same principle behind a monogamous relationship? Excluding others to be special?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 02:30 AM
8

Societal impacts: monogamy is the best way to ensure that the ratio of men and women are distributed evenly. A woman and a man then would have the same value. And the idea of loving only one person in your life support this concept, thus the desire for your partner’s virginity. Personal impact: • A virgin girl shows that she have self-control as it is much easier for a woman to have sex if she want to. Thus, with good self-control, she’s less likely to cheat •Logically you’ll be more special to …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 02:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter