TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TailorMade808 Archive

View 12 posts and 172 comments by TailorMade808 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I know someone who was busted arranging a date with the express purpose of this kind of thing happening. He's now in jail.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 11:28 PM
–

No self respecting white male would want to write for buzzfeed anyway
/r/MensRights19/02/16 12:44 PM
0

I'll be sure to do that friend :) Also, we are thankful. I am thankful. I appreciate everything she did for us. And it's not like it was complete charity, we paid our way. Besides, I'm not on trial here. You don't know me. Yet you've come here to attack me personally despite knowing nothing about me other than my post history. Unless you do know me, in which case, talk to me personally lol. I don't say anything here that I won't say to people I know. I'm an open book. The issue here is the "inst…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:03 PM
–

Of course it's easier, I'm not saying it isn't. But is it right? That's the question I would ask. As for your assertions about us having family we could have stayed with. No. We didn't. Not at that point in time. Not as an entire family unit anyway. That you had to create a throwaway account just to tell me I'm "playing the victim", when I'm not I'm merely relaying my experience with the social services, says more about you than i need to know. Try someone else bud :p
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:15 PM
–

This hits home. I'm also in Australia. My partner and I were going through a rough patch financially when our daughter was around 1. Right then the "friend" whose spare room we were renting broke up with her bf and hit the reset button so she decided to boot us out. We luckily found a family refuge last minute, within days of needing to move out. But we were told repeatedly by the various organisations we called that if we weren't together she'd be able to get help immediately. The workers at th…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 10:01 AM
3

Because everywhere else on reddit is a male space why can't you just let them have their one thing you mysoginistic shitlord. /s
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:09 AM
25

Historically women have had more safety than men. At every point in history men have always been more likely to die or be gravely injured at every single point in their life than women. And this isn't just outdated historical stuff, it's still the case. In every age bracket men die at higher rates today. Yet women are the unsafe ones? The rights is trickier. Women have, at various times, had their freedoms curbed in order to protect that safety. No one is questioning that. No one is saying it wa…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:43 PM
8

Also, we may agree that these things need to change. But until you can call a spade a spade and acknowledge that these are discriminations against men, stemming from a societal disapproval of men and men's choices then the problem will not go away. These are not side issues of "patriarchy". These are men's issues they are the oranges to women's apples. You will not hijack our issues to keep your movement relevant to further demonise us
/r/MensRights07/02/16 02:25 PM
–

Do you think an MRA would even be allowed to set up an AMA in r/ feminism?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:15 AM
9

"I don't agree with your evidence, it does not support my predetermined outcome. I'm going to ignore your several examples and provide one, but it includes rape which is far worse than being uneducated, poor, the overwhelming victim of literally every other type of violence, ignored, not in control of your own body or wallet and dead, rape you guys, rape! Why aren't you having the Pavlovian response my commanders have trained society to have? I said rape. Also passive agressive sign off" There y…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:14 AM
8

The founder of gender studies curricula dally Miller gearheart laid out a plan for a female future which included reducing the male population to 10% and also included marginalising and treating as men, any heterosexual women. That you have graduated from a course that has not changed its Core views since then and routinely added more male hatred, revisionist history, and straight up lies to its lessons does not in any way make you an expert on gender. It is not a badge of honour. You graduated …
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:59 AM
6

So it's ok. As long as it's done your way?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:59 AM
–

You "just got female circumcision banned in Africa, yay"??? Didn't you JUST say two comments before that you don't like any culture forcing their way into other cultures? Yet you are celebrating doing exactly that while baby boys here at home are still being mutilated with their abusers having full protection of the law and society, they even throw parties for it. I'm beginning to think you're trolling us
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:48 AM
19

But you still believe that these are caused by attitudes which are sexist to women. Because men have institutionalised power and aren't affected by sexism of their own. They can only experience side effects of sexism against women. The type of sexism that's positive, and benefits them. Do you actually think that makes actual sense?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:44 AM
8

I'm not being disrespectful. I'm making your point for you.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:37 AM
14

And herein lies the difference between the "typical feminist" and the typical MRA. We read feminist theory, we read alternative theories on gender, we listen to the experiences of women (both in and out group), we live the experiences of men (those of us who identify that way of course, those of us who don't identify that way tend to listen to Mens claimed lived experience). We read the same media sources you do, and we read the alternative media. Then we form our views and end up here. The typi…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:35 AM
–

Where can I sign up for this sexism? Being able, nay expected to do what I want to do and stay at home and raise my daughter without anyone judging me for that choice? Not having to do the relevant time for crimes I've committed because prison is far too harsh of an environment for little old lawbreaking me? This is the second time you've taken institutionalised sexist discrimination which negatively affects men while benefiting women and tried to paint it as sexism against women. Sorry if I can…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:19 AM
–

Discriminated against. But it's not sexist because institutionalised systems of power make it impossible, yadda yadda... We get it
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:09 AM
–

Ok. How is that worse than blaming testosterone for the worlds ills?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:08 AM
3

Oh look. It points out negative behaviours of both men and women. They are different but equally horrible. Wowsers. Nothing to do with bad driving though. You are devoid of any ability to think critically. You clearly see that which you want to see whilst ignoring any other evidence. I, nor anyone else that I've seen on this thread have denied that historically men are more violent creatures than women. Violence has nothing to do with bad driving. Competitiveness, yes, but not all elements of ba…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:06 AM
3

Bad driving which you equate with road rage caused by testosterone. Though road rage is not an exclusively male phenomena. And bad driving can result from other things. Speeding, which may have links to testosterone, more likely adrenaline and endorphins. But texting when driving. Talking with friends in the back seat. Doing make up or hair. None of these are exclusively male, or caused by testosterone. So I don't know where you're going with this at all. Over generalising and drawing very weak …
/r/MensRights07/02/16 08:22 AM
–

If you don't like men blaming your hormones despite the evidence supporting that they do cause bouts of irrationality, arousal, and general mood swings. Why is it ok for you to blame men's hormones? I understand that what you are saying is backed by evidence. But so is the PMS thing... Soooo what's good for the goose
/r/MensRights07/02/16 08:12 AM
3

That's because a sperm is not a child and no one considers it such. A woman can get her tubes tied without facing protesters. Because likewise, no one thinks an ovary is a child. A zygote however is a more complicated matter. Some people think it's a child. This is where the problem occurs. It is not, as often claimed, stemming from a hatred of women or a desire to control women's bodies. But you know this. Also, if you want to talk about birth control/the right to choose parenthood. While women…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 07:59 AM
–

Wait, so you actually acknowledge that men can be victims of sexism? Lol
/r/MensRights07/02/16 06:31 AM
–

Women are considered primary caregivers, which is sexist. This is something that bothers me so much, especially as a stay at home father. I understand that the societally prescribed role of Carer is limiting, and that sucks and is why I fully support the idea of women's lib, which has for the most part been achieved in regard to this. However, it is sexist against men. I would rather someone stereotype me and make positive assumptions about my skills as a parent than to have what is the case for…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 05:44 AM
-3

Doesn't belong here
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:25 PM
2

No... Just no
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:16 PM
–

They're gearing up for war
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:58 PM
–

Ugh I got banned from the for "defending the creep". They were shaming a dude for not getting the hint from the "victims" sarcastic and uninterested responses. It was clear as day that English was the dudes second language. I pointed that out. BOOM banned. I've seen them shame so many guys who clearly don't speak English all that well for not picking up on their subtle "fuck offs"... But I guarantee they all support black lives matter and endorse open borders. No self awareness whatsoever
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:48 AM
2

Ok, this would be alright I suppose. But it would never work. We would come under attack from the feminist protesters. And the media would paint it as us there in support.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 04:07 PM
2

Protesting in the manner someone else suggested where we are simply there to point out that we are different groups and don't think the same way is something I'm fine with. However, inevitably we would Come under attack from the people there protesting their gathering and it would become a clustermuck, where invariably we end up lumped into their (rok's) side anyway But if we were to join the protests trying to stop them from meeting that would be another thing entirely. That is attempting to in…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 04:01 PM
–

I disagree. We shouldn't be advocating for stopping men from being able to meet in public. Wether we agree with their particular views or not. It will be used against us
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:10 AM
3

One and the same. They pay an extra $500 a year into the super (401k?/retirement fund) of women. To help close the wage gap/gap in retirement funds.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 09:38 PM
–

Anz is a bank in Aus
/r/MensRights30/01/16 11:30 AM
2

I subscribe to her pages and her podcast. I think a lot of the shit she says is insanely stupid. though she pulls her head out and makes some good points from time to time, never about men obviously. Anyway I just don't like our community being misrepresented like that so I've commented with the link to the original thread and pointed out that most of us defended her right to be offensive. When you're a person like her or Milo, If you aren't offending someone you aren't doing your job.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:16 AM
1

Thanks a lot dude ... :)
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:30 AM
–

Ah who cares. It's an unfunny comedy sketch misrepresenting men's rights. Let's not be like feminists yeah? It's "comedy" it's meant to be over the top and stupid
/r/MensRights24/01/16 05:05 AM
3

They are in my local stores. I used to buy the ladies bic disposables because they were $1.50-$2 cheaper (Aus)
/r/MensRights20/01/16 12:56 PM
1

Yeah, because those two things are exactly the same./s Your tenuous grasp on biological realities begs me to ask, are you perchance a feminist?
/r/MensRights18/01/16 05:36 AM
3

I disagree completely. There is nothing wrong with wearing heels. There is certainly nothing unattractive about being in a wheel chair. Masculinity is whatever the hell you as a man want it to be. Those things may not be for you, or for me, but who are we to say what anyone else can do. This is completely off message for the men's rights sub. This ad is not anti traditional male at all. It may look to expand the view of what is maleness but that is something we should embrace. This isn't a hate …
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:45 AM
2

I agree with what you're saying, in that calling the motivations of another's beliefs into question is kind of stupid and useless. However I don't see them as the same. They may sound the same at first. But one has a basis in logic and the other doesn't. Ideas aren't created equal Edit: you're right though it doesn't look good
/r/MensRights16/01/16 04:08 AM
2

He keeps using this word fascist.... I don't think he knows what it means lol
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:45 AM
–

However, women don't need to join any kind of anything to get sex. Women control the supply of sex. That's been made clear with all the yes means yes, clear enthusiastic consent, drunk people having sex=man is rapist, etc stuff. So logically, women joining a movement of socially undesirable men (in feminist and mainstream eyes) in order to get some d doesn't make sense. Men joining feminism though, makes perfect logical sense. It's a righteous cause that the controllers of sexual supply huddle a…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:11 AM
–

Uhhh, I know I'm gonna get blasted for this. But that didn't sound consensual. It didn't sound like rape either. But it didn't sound consensual. I disagree with everything clementine says, especially "it's rape if she decides it felt like rape" or "no one should be asking is it rape", both of those statements are beyond moronic. But this particular story is one of those weird grey zone things. Legally it's not rape and so I wouldn't call it rape. But it's not consensual sex either. It's this wei…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 09:10 AM
9

*all civilisation
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:19 PM
–

Once again the right wing media are the only place allowing discussion on these progressive issues
/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:52 AM
–

It's hard to learn from history when the history you believe is completely made up
/r/MensRights06/01/16 10:03 AM
1

No. But I remember that one also. Hilarious
/r/MensRights05/01/16 12:58 PM
3

This is the one!!! Thank you
/r/MensRights05/01/16 12:57 PM
5

Hmmm black man talking being demonised for talking out of line to a white woman, this could NEVER end badly
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:41 AM
7

I'd advise to keep it short and snappy. What you have is good. But the more concise you are the more it sticks. "Diversity includes diversity of thought" "Thinking differently is admirable" Etc etc
/r/MensRights04/01/16 12:18 PM
2

Not a single reference to the "domestic violence epidemic" we are facing because of course this doesn't count it was a woman! Also mandatory mention that it may have been self defence without any evidence to back up that claim. No "if you or anyone you know Is experiencing domestic violence" hotline message at the end of the article either, because they don't want this linked in with that narrative because vagina
/r/MensRights04/01/16 04:27 AM
8

Common practice. I was banned from feminism for sharing an article which had feminist leanings, and then askfeminists for asking why I would have been banned and directed to meta feminism which is for questions about the feminism sub itself. So I asked there. Banned. Still no answer. Figures
/r/MensRights03/01/16 03:09 AM
1

I agree. But they consider not thinking of them and saying things like "everybody looks" to be asex erasure. Tumblr culture man. We know damn well they watch the shit we say here. No need to give them fodder. he says whilst existing while white and male thus giving them fodder
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:45 AM
–

Asexual people probably dont. Can't go erasing their identities. But let's not pretend that's the standard either. There's nothing wrong with being asexual. But If it was the standard. The human race would not exist.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 09:28 AM
1

Not all feminists no. But feminism on the whole, yes. It makes sense for the men's rights movement to be largely anti feminism, and for us to revel in any level of exposure to the hypocrisy of the movement. There may even be times we agree with feminist thought or actions. But this does not discount the need for a strong anti feminism approach to our issues. They have built a wall in the name of equality which stands in the way of true progress. For progress to be made by any group who are actua…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:04 AM
1

Yeah. I see that. But it shouldn't be. That's the problem lol
/r/MensRights25/12/15 03:24 AM
–

So an article calling for the death of all men (number 8 on their list) is not about men's rights? What about mens right to live? I mean, without that one what's the point fighting for any of the others. I disagree with you. This is relevant. We live in a society where calling for death to all men is not considered hate speech. It is our job to point this shit out
/r/MensRights25/12/15 02:37 AM
4

But if this goes to jury trial. All the sob stories in the media and the case if the judge allows it will affect the outcome of the trial
/r/MensRights22/12/15 08:02 PM
–

It is not the same. No matter how much you want it to be. One involves the formation and termination of life. The other is a boner. These things are not the same. If someone has a moral objection to sex, good for them, don't do it and remove the stupid from the gene pool.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 10:41 PM
–

It doesn't prove your point. Because the abortion issue whilst constantly framed as a "control of women's bodies/sexual choices" issue is actually a deep philosophical issue of when the right to life begins. Mens erectile medication though is purely to do with male sexuality/bodies/health. Restricting one of these is sexist. The other is not. Apples. Oranges.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 12:50 PM
2

I did say minors. But I also said boys, because honestly they are. Our kids are so sheltered at this point that they aren't thrust into adulthood until they are 18 and even then it takes a few years for them to adapt. And not all of them are 16 or over. I've seen plenty who were 12-14, and of course that one who was 11 and was raped by the babysitter with the dads permission. Boys are subject to a rape culture, just as men in prison are. Women, especially on college campus', not so much.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/15 08:58 PM
–

Oh but white people started in America. Because fuck history
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:48 AM
10

When they talk about gun ownership percentages I just have to chuckle. Because what they are talking about is REGISTERED gun ownership. How hilarious that white men abiding by the law to obtain legal firearms makes us look like the majority of people with guns when that is just simply untrue. We're the majority of people with legally obtained guns. But please continue telling us were the problem.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:47 AM
4

This, and the representative in Washington proposing an anti safe space bill.... The fight back has begun! Thank the gods. Now we need a men's rights group to set up camp there. Showing all the universities denying their applications that it's not dangerous to have us represented on campus
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:19 AM
2

Or in schools, where female teachers are free to prey on boys with little to no punishment. I mean, I'm basing this off news reports and I generally trust the news as far as I can throw it. But it seems like every other week at least I'm seeing a female teacher let off for one reason or another after abusing their power to have sex with minors
/r/TheRedPill18/12/15 07:51 AM
8

You would be wrong -source: college student, in Australia,as far as I can tell it is far worse elsewhere. But it's bad here too
/r/MensRights16/12/15 03:29 AM
–

Increasing convictions does not mean the same thing as eroding the presumption of innocence. You can achieve one without the other. If the new style court makes it honestly feel safer for real victims, male or female, to come forward then it's a good thing. And if more real victims are coming forward we may end up seeing more convictions. That can be done while still operating with an innocent until proven guilty mindset. Which is what this proposal says it's going for. Until the report is publi…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 10:33 AM
–

How so? She explicitly says she doesn't want to do that. Some of the reforms don't sound bad. I mean, if a girl regrets your sex and wants to take it to this alternate court possibility and it's a discussion where you acknowledge that her regret means rape and you should have somehow been able to read her future thoughts and you're sorry that you were unable to. If THATS the option then non rapists aren't going to jail as rapists. Sounds pretty good to me compared to the current situation
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:58 AM
7

I see you say this in every thread. I'm pretty sure I've messaged you about it before. I get it. I do. But you should try to write more contextual comments to add to the discussion as opposed to just using a catchphrase which doesn't really work in every situation. Just my 2c.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:50 AM
–

I count 30
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:07 PM
2

I'd say I've had around half of them said to me. Unless we're meant to take it literally because no I wasn't told I'm pretty but handsome. And certain words were gender flipped but the sentiment was the same. Also, aren't a lot of them things that feminists say "you're going to be bored at home" "don't you feel unfulfilled only being a mother" etc
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:04 AM
–

As long as society as we know it has existed the only thing that reeeeally mattered was how rich you were. Greece and Rome especially. I'd say the golden age of men was hunter gatherer times. Second to that maybe the Viking era in Northern Europe.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:09 PM
3

"Would it be OK for a civil rights activist to mirror a Nazi site to make sure it wasn't getting advertising?" Yes motherboard, yes it would. Morally I would be absolutely okay with that. But way to compare yourselves to nazis, you're doing our job for us! This just in motherboard are pro nazi funding. Can't make this shit up lmao
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:56 AM
2

I read your post about the double binds/catch 22's and he was straight up wrong there. Here he seems to have done a good objective job. Not familiar with cixous at all so I don't know if what he is putting forth as her views is accurate or just his interpretation but he does appear to be quite objective. One thing though. I Haven't taken any philosophy classes but as a history major the idea of success being defined in masculine terms or phallic terms as he and cixous put it really bothers me. F…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:41 AM
9

To use a common feminist example: If you have a bowl of 100 m&m's and know that 1 is poisoned, are you going to eat from that bowl? We know that we could be brought up on sexual harassment charges or end up being named and shamed if we are unfortunate enough to try to flirt with a clementine ford or an Anita sarkeesian. We know most women are fine. But the risk is there and it isn't worth it.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:34 AM
–

This... And it will be taken more seriously coming from a female claiming the environment is hostile to men than it would from a man
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:39 PM
–

Reasonable force restrictions apply in this instance. He's blocking the door? Push him out of the way, don't beat the shit out of him in a self professed fit of rage. There is no excuse
/r/MensRights13/11/15 01:16 AM
1

You're book is titled "logical fallacies" A jury can not be held liable for their judgement should it be proven incorrect, which this one hasn't (though I would agree with you that it was). Juries are protected in that way. It's not a perfect system, but also it is...lawyers are slimy and good ones can convince a jury that the sky is purple.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 02:32 AM
–

No it can't. He was a juror. Not an accomplice
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:52 PM
–

That's not helpful. Implied threats do nothing for our cause
/r/MensRights10/11/15 11:58 AM
1

I don't identify as strictly male or female. I have my man days, I have my lady days. I prefer the term gender fluid, and that is an accepted term but most feminists refer to it as genderqueer. I'm here I'm queer And I'm regularly up voted.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:54 PM
–

I'm in the same boat. I personally despise a lot of milos views. But when it comes to the principle of free speech we agree. And that leads me to support him, it trumps anything else. Because without the freedom of speech there wouldn't BE anything else.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:31 PM
–

This article is filth on so many levels. A feminist blog celebrating the new pm of Canada not because of his politics but because he's a "babe". Then they say he's even hotter because he has enforced false equality on his cabinet. I'm all for the diverse cabinet I think diversity CAN be great, it's better when it's organic which this clearly isn't. This will prove to be an interesting political experiment though. I actually do expect it to go well for them. But this article is just trash.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:06 AM
3

One third of the backers too in terms of numbers
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:49 AM
1

Ahh, I must have missed that discussion. I do think it would be nice to have a hashtag movement which could extend beyond that day though
/r/MensRights04/11/15 12:07 PM
–

Radical idea. Why not vote based on their policies instead of their chosen ideological labels?
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:31 AM
4

Ok. So for other interested parties the discussion starts at 13:45 Interesting. She didn't really get to talk. Sounds like an mra to me! Go caddie!
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:52 AM
–

Fight fire with fire though. It's interesting to see their own weapons used against them. Because what's he going to do with the misogyny accusation? Point out that it's not misogyny it's just criticism of her, in doing this he invalidates every other feminist claim of misogyny online. It's a bold move cotton, let's see if it pays off
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:23 AM
–

Link to the video? My Google fu has failed
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:21 AM
–

Isn't that last one cultural appropriation?
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:15 AM
2

Important thing to note. 2 of the 3 articles he cites as misleading the public about her award winning status by not doing their research and wording their articles incorrectly are articles written by feminist journalists for websites with a feminist tilt. They were also interviews promoting her previous film. Not the red pill
/r/MensRights02/11/15 05:55 AM
–

I just don't see a scenario where he gets a chance to connect that punch. I agree with you that if he connected it's over. But I just don't see him landing the punch. We'll never know though really so it's a useless debate
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:43 PM
–

In a fight? I'd put my money on her. In a boxing match? No way
/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:19 AM
–

It's funny because they want her so bad. Because she is, quite literally, a strong woman. But that strength, and the mindset she has needed to obtain it, is the exact reason she could never be a feminist icon. She's too in touch with reality. She's too smart. She's not a victim and I doubt she would ever let herself be. She's amazing lol
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:05 AM
1

No such thing as a bad light. Certain people will think what they're going to think anyway. Others will hear what is said and look into it for themselves and Logic will win out. Any light shined will achieve this. Positive light will obviously be better. But many of us were drawn here despite the negative light and even the negative aspects.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 11:25 PM
11

But this is our option right now. No one else is offering to make a film. It's worth the gamble imo
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:42 AM
–

I disagree. And I prefer to hope for the good and expect the bad. Rather than just outright dismiss that any good can exist.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 11:57 PM
–

I think for us the trailer is amazing. Showing the trailer to those with a feminist viewpoint, or a neutral (which lets be honest is still heavily feminist influenced) viewpoint, has proven to be difficult. They can't get past the 2 minute mark in my experience since the first 2-3 minutes is all MRA's and it makes them "feel sick"
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:04 PM
–

I'm far from financially comfortable and I managed to pony up. Anyone who cares about these issues should pledge. Even if it ends up being a hit piece, how were we supposed to know? At least we tried lol
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:02 PM
–

No, I'm not. I fight the bullshit regularly to the point of regular ostracism. But that doesn't mean I can't accept the fact that there are good and bad everywhere. The ideology itself is bad (due to those in power controlling the narrative). However, some of the people who have been duped into following it are not bad. They can be harder to find and harder to get through to than most. But there exists those that aren't poisoned beyond treatment.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 09:46 PM
–

The thing is there are feminists out there who care and have the right ideas and approach. But they're buried under propaganda and lies and manipulations of those in control of the movement.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 09:32 PM
1

I just threw up, shat myself, and got a nosebleed all at once.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 08:31 PM
–

Backed this the other day and periodically check in on it but it appears to have stalled. It's depressing! We need to get this film made
/r/MensRights24/10/15 05:51 AM
–

Wow. Certainly no bias here. They make the headline specifically sound like this is STEM related, when it's education related, a field in which women greatly outnumber men but no one cares. And they find that they are twice as likely to hire more women than men and conclude there is no sexism? What the actual fuck? The logic is non existent
/r/MensRights23/10/15 08:16 AM
2

I just. I see you say that chivalry is shit on almost every thread here. And whilst I agree with you in part. Half the time it doesn't quite make sense
/r/MensRights22/10/15 08:02 PM
–

Wtf does this have to do with chivalry?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 12:55 PM
1

A) I didn't call you a name B) way to ignore my points entirely
/r/MensRights20/10/15 08:16 PM
–

But that's the thing, you did say it even if you don't realise it. The way averages work lends itself to this and gets used for false results all the time, like the average Australian wage being 75k/yr. that's bull, the average Australian does not earn that much. Super high earning outliers ruin the average. If we have 5 men and 5 women earning as follows Man 1: 42k/yr Man 2: 76k/yr Man 3: 7.2m/yr Man 4: 17k/yr Man 5: 120k/Yr Woman 1: 45k/yr Woman 2: 80k/yr Woman 3: 400k/yr Woman 4: 20k/yr Woman…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 08:05 PM
–

Gonna get a bit tin foil hat here but, surely they know this will only contribute to the problems? Girls have all the power to turn in boys and even other girls, while presumably not having to be accountable for their own speech. Boys will be getting into more trouble, undoubtedly sometimes on false accusations because he did something else to upset the girl. More trouble leads to more acting out Keats to lower grades. This contributes to the failing academic achievement of boys
/r/MensRights20/10/15 01:12 PM
3

I suffer from this line of thought too. But sometimes there's no choice but to fight fire with fire. It sucks. Your art however was brilliant. Keep it up. The mrm needs support from the artistic communities
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:12 AM
1

I agree with you. It's terrible. I was kind of doeskin in terms of, in their eyes... Not right or wrong
/r/MensRights20/10/15 12:23 AM
1

They aren't really women though. They're doing it wrong /s
/r/MensRights20/10/15 12:09 AM
–

As far as I can tell they aren't lying. There is money that needs to be repaid. The government pays the child support to the mother regardless of wether they receive money from the father. So the government were paying child support to the mother, the father was giving money directly to the children instead of the government to cover the money being paid to the mother. In my opinion the mother should have to prove she spent the money on the kids (I'm not assuming she didn't, she probably did) an…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:09 PM
–

Is there a chance she may be being sarcastic? I want to give benefit of the doubt because she says in one single paragraph that when your sperm leaves your body it's no longer your sperm it's hers. But if that sperm results in a baby then that baby is your responsibility. I want to give benefit of the doubt here and say she's being semi satirical to make a point of how ridiculous these arguments sound. Anything else just doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 10:01 PM
–

Here's what I don't get. She says we need to do more to acknowledge male victims of DV, she never said we need to prioritise male victims, because that is ridiculous. But she's still getting torn a new one with the same old tired bs
/r/MensRights19/10/15 12:19 PM
1

I'm curious as to wether you read my comment in the images at all. I'm not the type of MRA who spews vile at women. They exist yes just as extremist feminists exist. I'm glad you acknowledged that as too many try to trot out the "not a real feminist" fallacy in regards to these people. We can agree on this much it seems. There are toxic aspects to both of our movements. Moving on, my comment did nothing to further any toxic ideology, it merely decried the more toxic aspects of feminism (censorsh…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 09:27 AM
1

This is actually brilliant. If anyone else wants to help tweet the imgur link at them asking how it violated? My Twitter is @thegsimoleon
/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:36 AM
1

Pretty sure on their platform they own it. T&C's
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:03 PM
–

Can't post or comment on anything on Facebook. My own wall. Friends walls/statuses, pages, groups, the lot
/r/MensRights18/10/15 02:15 PM
–

Having trouble finding any appeal process to speak of. Any help pointing in the right direction would be appreciated
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:35 PM
–

They actually actively watch and ask? That seems wrong. :/
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:33 PM
–

Good god they're everywhere. I just don't get how it's becoming so pervasive. I mean, I do get it. Indoctrination, plying in emotion yadda yadda. But I believe a lot of the same things. But hypersensitivity never helped anyone
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:31 PM
–

No. But Were adults so "girlfriend" seems a bit ridiculous especially with the length of time we've been together. But we aren't married. So partner? Life mate? Lover? Permanent friend with benefits? I don't really know any other way to put it
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:30 AM
–

Genderqueer, there's no proof. Though as a person who doesn't fully identify with either gender I wouldn't reccomend using this if you truly 100% feel like a man. But even if you're 98% man, since gender is now a spectrum you can claim you aren't and no one can say shit about it
/r/MensRights18/10/15 10:35 AM
14

I never say no to cheese. My whine isn't so much of a whine. As a free speech is meant to be protected and valued thing. And it's not like I was calling someone an asshole or wishing someone was raped and calling that free speech, I was legitimately debating issues. Injustice no matter how small is still injustice.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:26 AM
–

I can still see them :/ Anyone else can't see them?
/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:22 AM
–

Posted on til, appears to have been deleted? But could just be the app I'm using
/r/MensRights18/10/15 04:08 AM
–

Yep. Can't post or comment on anything for three days. Can use messenger though
/r/MensRights18/10/15 04:07 AM
38

Calling out bullshit is regular stuff to me though. Lol
/r/MensRights18/10/15 02:30 AM
–

The Facebook support pages sort of led me around in circles. There is no official way to appeal a decision like that, at least that I could find. I did post in the support forums under the category "I'm blocked". A quick perusal of other posts I didn't see any too similar to mine but other examples of people being blocked, some pro gun views etc. most posts under the "I'm blocked" category appear to be ignored by the Facebook staff and those that have been responded to seem to just repeat the "l…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 01:26 AM
12

I'm all for it. But didn't know where else to go but here haha. Brian Alvarez who was active in the same comment thread. Posted these images and pointed out that this is proof of some of the points we were making, that dissenting opinions and points are completely removed, censored, banned etc when the typical responses don't work, as to why modern feminism actually does more harm than good. If you can think of somewhere else we could post this/raise this issue I'm all for it just let me know wh…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 01:09 AM
–

Shoot I'm an old folk now? Twitter is too tiresome. And snapchat makes no sense Shit... I am old aren't i
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:56 AM
22

Men write the dictionary. It's patriarchy!
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:31 AM
12

Yeah I know. I don't care. There is no privacy or anonymity online anyway really so why bother :p Good lookin out though, cheers
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:03 AM
–

I feel the same! My partner pointed out to me though that the more I argue with these people on Facebook and other similar platforms the more I'll see because the algorithm sees me interacting and pulls up more similar content. She thinks if I just leave them alone I'll see it disappear. But I feel like that will just let them spread if there's no one there to argue against it. :/
/r/MensRights17/10/15 10:25 PM
–

This was on the huffpost - women Facebook page. They have a video up entiitled "feminism ain't a dirty word" A few people including Karen straughan, Brian Martinez and others were dismantling the video in the comments. I was quite active in a few different comment threads when this comment was flagged to Facebook, they reviewed it and decided to remove it and temporarily block me from commenting or posting anywhere on Facebook. I checked the guidelines and I didn't violate anything, in fact thei…
/r/MensRights17/10/15 10:09 PM
11

This is actually brilliant!
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:03 AM
2

I second the request for this information
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:01 AM
–

It does. I got banned from r/feminism for posting an article with feminist undertones. I went to ask feminism to ask why I got banned and got banned there. Went to meta feminism to ask and got banned there too. In the sub where you're meant to ask questions about the other two subs moderation I asked a question and got banned. You get banned for anything over there and never get an explanation
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:24 AM
2

The horrible part is. If it wasn't for the clear satire label, I would have thought this was legitimate
/r/MensRights26/09/15 04:56 AM
2

Loki'd
/r/MensRights20/09/15 03:27 AM
1

Worst part about this article is the claiming that women can have multiple thoughts at one time but men can't. -.- Really? Really? I guess it's not sexist because "power structures"
/r/MensRights19/09/15 11:42 AM
2

It's not the objectification itself that is the problem though. It's the complaining about objectification of women whilst simultaneously celebrating the objectification of men. Pick a side feminists you can't have your cake and eat it too, shit or get off the pot, etc
/r/MensRights19/09/15 11:40 AM
–

She posted an unsolicited tit pic. I was forced to look at it when the myriad of random females on my timeline shared it. She flashed me. But all men want to see tits right so it's okay when she does it
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:38 PM
4

It is literally now a crime in NY to sit while possessing testicles... PROGRESS!!!
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:17 PM
–

The father caused her mental illness. Her mental illness killed the boy. Calling it. "When will we stop letting men control us into downward spirals? The body count is too high" /feminist/sjw
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:06 PM
–

Source?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:01 PM
3

Stay at home dad here... Don't consider myself lazy... When housework/kid duty/my uni work all pile on it can be exhausting, no more or less exhausting than work at any of my prior day jobs but about the same. More pressure to multi task at home which can be mentally more exhausting at times. Anyway, I will often give myself a solid hour break, sometimes two of them IF I can find the time (i can recall one time this happened in the last 2 weeks)...i generally spend half of that break chatting aw…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:45 PM
–

Haha. For what?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:27 AM
–

Apparently because she's going to be working more days than studying she can't switch to the student payment of i become "the parent". If she was on a student payment from the beginning though (like I suggested) and I was on the parenting payment. When she got the job it wouldn't cancel her payment it would just be a matter of reporting the income.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:23 PM
–

Australian. Used the word welfare just because most people on here would understand what that is compared to me saying centrelink lol
/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:50 PM
–

Ok so I have had this debate with a couple of different people in various circles and this is what I've found. You can not be racist to whites because whites hold all the power and can't know oppression. Same goes for sexism to men. It is the most ridiculous argument I've ever heard in my life. But there it is
/r/MensRights09/05/15 08:33 PM
1

that has to be a troll, surely
/r/MensRights16/04/15 02:29 AM
8

This video is heart breaking. I feel so bad for the Kid. And it's terrifying for me, I relate to the father a lot. A lot of sentiments expressed I this video are ones I share. Thankfully my partner is not like the woman here. Obviously we don't know the whole story. Anything could be going on. But the whole thing is just heart breaking. To then read that a judge forced the issue against the child wishes. It's terrifying. Absolutely terrifying
/r/MensRights25/01/15 01:10 AM
1

But those things are true. At least in the popular lexicon of opinion. People do view those things as being sexist.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:11 PM
2

Thank you :)
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:05 AM
1

I agree. Others don't. Lol
/r/MensRights11/01/15 11:45 PM
–

Fair assumption. A move to smaller communities is something I am all for. But at the same time I don't think human compassion and good will is limited in that sense. I believe we can extend that good well to populations no matter the size. Maybe I'm an unrealistic idealist hahaha
/r/MensRights11/01/15 11:25 PM
1

So again I feel this it's all based on context. I do believe we are a hypersensitive culture in particular when it comes to consuming of Media and judgement of those in the public eye. However in our every day dealings with one another in the real world. Maybe we aren't sensitive enough to the microagressions present in our daily lives. I do think one is born from the other and like I said in a comment to another poster, the sensitive need to work on being less so and the abrasive need to work o…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 11:05 PM
–

The nurse story was probably a poor example. But it made me feel uncomfortable in what was supposed to be a professional clinical environment. I do understand that some of that is on me and I'm working on those inclinations. I am not a fan of victim culture. But I truly believe it is a two way street, I need to work harder to not be offended by little things but at the same time we as people do need to be more conscious off the little things. I'm a setting like a pub, those jokes are fine. I'm a…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 11:00 PM
–

Firstly, Thank you for reading and for the constructive feedback. The question mark probably was me searching for my spine. I have since edited it and removed it. But upon reflection it was. Because all too often in the fight against discrimination, for equality of all, I have felt as I'm sure many others do that my voice is not important. That because of my luck in the lottery of birth, I could not possibly understand inequality or what it feels like to be discriminated against. I am still find…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:51 PM
2

Oh absolutely. I would happily refer to myself as an mra. Not a feminist. For the reasons you started especially, amongst others. And I Alsov agree the onus isn't necessarily on us to stop "squabbling". But in Some cases it may benefit the MRA movement to come across less adversarial. I find this sub to be great though
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:32 PM
–

This is my first blog on topics like this so... Please... Be gentle
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:59 AM
3

Ok this may sound stupid. But I honestly can't tell if this is satire or not. Nothing on the site points to it being satire other than the ridiculousness of the articles but then... Please someone tell me this is satire???
/r/MensRights12/11/14 01:59 AM
0

It can. Absolutely
/r/MensRights26/10/14 11:10 PM
–

That men don't talk about it embrace their emotions? Or that men handle their problems without any assistance. Ideas like that which are total and utter bull shit. And Anita Sarkesian is a man hating moron. But I don't know why I've been downvoted just got saying shes not wrong. She words it horribly and comes from the wrong angle at the problem. But she's not wrong on this one
/r/MensRights26/10/14 06:52 AM
–

I normally disagree and hate on Anita Sarkesian as much as anyone else. But in this instance I don't see a need to be outraged. She's right. Traditional concepts of masculinity arent challenged enough.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 12:18 PM
1

I never said he didn't hate women. Last time I checked women are part of the world population....anyone can pull quotes from anything to support any argument if they're careful enough. When taken as a while his manifesto clearly paints a picture of hatred for the world. We're never going to agree. You will always believe what you believe because your mind is narrow. You can only see the trees, ignoring the fact that there is a forest. And that's fine, whatever makes you happy. But don't be surpr…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 07:15 AM
1

Looking at anything and seeing "sides" is probably part of the problem
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:32 AM
6

Complete fairness is absolutely the goal. Fairness for everyone regardless of gender, sexual orientation, colour, etc. Shouldn't that be everyone's goal?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:28 AM
12

You say it isn't true yet any comment in that thread you linked us to that attempts to mention other facets of what went on here gets deleted. Anytime someone comes in to talk about the fact that more men were killed, but seemingly no one cares. Or any time the fact that his video speech disturbingly targeted men aswell as women as this disturbed individual considered himself a god above us all and hated all of us... Any comments in that vein are swiftly deleted. At least here we let you speak.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter