TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TakoSuWuvsU Archive

View 2 posts and 178 comments by TakoSuWuvsU on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
117

Social IssuesTakoSuWuvsU/r/MensRights21/09/21 12:50 AM
1

Post for ModsTakoSuWuvsU/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 07:10 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's so funny that people don't realize that women dominating customer service and fast food fronts is just women being put in positions of blame, because it's a patriarchy. In a patriarchy, women are allowed to make more mistakes because they're considered lesser. Everything is working as intended, the patriarchs in upper echelons are securing access and preventing yours, while making you blame women every step of the way. This setup primarily benefits elite men who want their pick of premium t…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 06:33 PM
1

You should reread the law. It's actually far more cursed than you think. The punishment is that if you self immolate and survive, you'll go to jail if you survive. If you die, only then does next of kin get punished. Not necessarily the one who pressured you? Also, it's not "unclear if it's been completely stamped out", as police still are stopping it from occurring, with protests when they stop it. Then you of course have acid attacks, and uh, rape parades. https://www.npr.org/2023/07/21/118918…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/23 08:40 PM
1

Female dominated fields are often also the under appreciated fields. It evens out in acadamia a bit, but in the less paid education positions they're there in mass. Super intendents and principles also tend to even out more. Despite them being the majority in those roles, who would be eligible to take the higher positions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 09:10 AM
0

Dude, this is india. Do you know what india is like? Women are expected to self immolate if their husband dies, so that the money they'd inherit instead goes to the men of the family. They are oppressed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 09:07 AM
0

I was talking using their understanding of left/right, they considered left leaning to be woman focused.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 04:29 PM
-1

If it was left leaning to a significant degree, this subreddit wouldn't have so many followers, and it'd probably be deleted. It's just that the pleasant/fun places are left leaning, because right wing groups almost always descend into anger and hate. It's a pretty common trend, all male exclusive reactionary groups like MRAs and MGTOW just turn into hate groups, but the members inside can't see they're driving off a cliff, so they don't stop.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 03:45 PM
-6

If you're in an MRA, please avoid women. You hate them, they're safer away from you, stay in your echo room.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 03:34 PM
2

I mean, things don't make me happy, but having things be guaranteed means I can focus on what makes me happy, like studying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 08:29 PM
1

Well, it's not really a caste system as much it is like, the annoying manual labor everyone hates being shared is probably good for people, but doctors would be excluded because they're already spending all day helping people, and it's bad to take up their time with things like that. Medicare for all and a guaranteed income isn't really a nanny state, it's just like, "this is our minimum living standard". If you desire to be a full time manual laborer, no one will stop you. But everyone doing a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 05:13 PM
1

You can teach critical thinking without math. For most people means people not studying those fields. We'll still have mathematicians and programmers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 09:41 AM
2

Well, it does depend on if they're a psychologist or a therapist, and then on which kind of therapeutic focus. Like, there's Freudian psychoanalysis, humanistic client centered, cognitive. I also don't know what you told them. In some fields of therapy the goal is to build self image and confidence for someone to be happy, without directly engaging with the negative aspects which I will tentatively say is happening here. Would you like to talk in DMs? Public posts tend to include a lot more jous…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 08:13 AM
2

I'm being completely serious. And we usually don't talk like that, but it's actually a serious issue of our focus mostly being on unhealthy minds. No one wants to study normal people because that doesn't really have any public impact and it's not interesting. There's a reason we fall over eachother to be the one to study the newest serial killer's psyche. I'm also only addressing it like this because I thought it would be funny after you said "They wouldn't agree if you were honest". Because we …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 07:37 AM
3

A case study, in depth examination of a single person. To give you the honesty you talked about, psychologists are fascinated by things like this. The false consensus, the denial, the perversion of super ego to serve the id, it's like a family eating dinner while the house burns down.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 07:24 AM
0

It's meant to mean someone worth being with. Aka the highest status. Also, all men under 5'8" should be forcibly feminized into catboys.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 07:08 AM
2

Can I do a case study on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 06:59 AM
-2

We're pretty close to machine mind reading, so once that's advanced enough we remove people with low empathy scores from the voting pool. Universal welfare, the duty of the state is to provide the best possible life for the occupants. In pre-college education, math is limited to what a person needs. This means instead of understanding the area of a half sphere half cone, you learn how to calculate finances and such. More focus on social sciences like philosophy, sociology, and ethics. Everyone w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 06:35 AM
-11

I'll DM them to you, I don't want to lose karma over my recommendations
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:49 AM
1

I never really thought of that as a reason criminals tend to be male, but from the former criminals i've met, yeah that checks out. Ironically, the thing about women tending to have a balanced IQ is probably why they get along with eachother so well. Once you're about two deviations above or below someone, communication can break down unless you spend a lot of time studying interpersonal communication. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201409/when-can-having-high-iq…
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:41 AM
6

They seem pretty supportive, what are you talking about?
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:17 AM
3

In my experience, it's better to just let him grab your head and set his own rhythm. adding teeth requires a lot of control, but if you can figure it out it makes most of them finish faster. If you're not a sub, I find a leash and collar that you pull on during works pretty well.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:16 AM
1

Fleshlights are fine, sex dolls are really creepy. But only if it's a high quality one, check out bad dragon, they have the real goods.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:08 AM
2

If it was before FOSTA, he should have went to eros or somewhere like that. They had reviews. But, generally it depends on price. The average rate ones are average, cheap is cheap, quality costs a lot more than most people will spend.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:03 AM
-1

They're not going to upvote that, it's not something that aligns with their views.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:52 AM
-1

Because when most women won't report an actual rape, and with it being so hard to prove, making them afraid of legal retaliation will probably make them even more afraid of reporting it.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:49 AM
-41

Which media? Because the media I watch is usually pretty gender neutral or in favor of men.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:29 AM
5

What are you talking about, that sounds amazing. He only really plays one role though, so we'd have to add some updates. Maybe he ends up as the prince's close guard, and shares a loving, longing look into the prince's eyes as they know their affection cannot be after arnold used a greatsword to annihilate the castle invaders.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:24 AM
1

F
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:19 AM
0

Okay, I was just checking, because the sources in the menarehuman website on the feminism section were almost all from those places.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:18 AM
0

The second one you linked, I said which one it was in my post. The discussion became about afghanistan and india because that's where the sources on the site you gave were from in the feminism section. They're from places where things are just kind of fucked all around in general.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:17 AM
1

Yeah but, jail doesn't really fix anything. People need therapy, not cages where they have to commit more crimes inside to survive.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:13 AM
1

I feel like it'd be pretty hard to figure that out, due to the bias of people that would do a survey like that. Maybe if you did the survey with an equal amount of rad feminist and mra researchers, and made it a broader study of both sexes.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:03 AM
1

No? Well, I guess it depends who. If they're white, they make up 10% of the world population. Han Chinese make up 19% of the world population, so technically normal is chinese culture. Which is kind of wack to think about.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 03:53 AM
-2

That was actually an informative read, but I don't think people really understand how big 7 cents is. That's a new triple A game at full time, 20 dollars an hour that the guy can have but the woman can't. At 26 dollars an hour(I just looked up median social worker pay), they get a dlc too.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 03:39 AM
1

You're dismissing women's issues because you think it's easy to prove things like this in individual cases. It's only easy to spot in statistics, individual cases are often impossible to prove. If you have a method to close the gap, I'd like to hear it, that would be pretty impressive if we could find something to deal with the overall issue that wouldn't cause much uproar.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:15 AM
2

It's not, I was tired and made so many typos, and I did not communicate it clearly. It's updated now.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:12 AM
-3

Do you have evidence for this claim? I'm not aware of one with "confounding variables", I'd like to see it and know what those variables are.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 10:40 PM
-1

Just because it's illegal doesn't stop it from happening. People with "black" names are less likely to be approved for interviews, it's illegal, but that doesn't stop it from happening. Also, how are they the most privileged? Because laws don't really, stop these kinds of things. The sexism still exists when it's illegal, people just hide it from being noticed better so they don't get arrested. The issue is mainly cultural.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 10:39 PM
1

Recording is a bigger no, I don't want him posting it as revenge porn. I can't afford a lawyer to deal with that.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 10:34 PM
1

It looked pretty condescending, especially here where I was just trying to avoid spending too much time on those people. With you continuing it though, I'm pretty sure it was the right choice to focus on other members.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 10:33 PM
1

I gave a read to the articles in the feminism section of the men are people too site. Are most of the people here from India and Afghanistan? Because that's where the reports seem to be of the bad feminist stuff. They kind of have very different dynamics than in the uk, us, and the other countries that come to mind when you think "false rape allegations" I'm in almost direct contact with feminist groups in Afghanistan, I can see why they would be paranoid of giving men there an inch when they ha…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 08:16 PM
2

If you want a traditional woman, you better be bringing in the kind of money that supports that. Which, generally isn't the case due to wealth concentrations. If you like traditional values, you should probably get woke, because our economics are not going to be fixed by traditionalists. A woman's purpose is not to be a child rearer. Woke people have not forgot the meaning of work, they just don't like the system that in the past let you own a house while being a waiter, that's now expecting mor…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:53 PM
2

You have to be careful how you say things here. You really have to toe the line in political groups like this or you'll be erased for not agreeing.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:43 PM
0

I mean, fear mongering is half the purpose of the sub.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:41 PM
6

It also just doesn't represent the chances of anything very accurately, by design social media wants to show you something bad and interesting.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:39 PM
5

And then you have a woman that was expecting traditional values, because you told her what to expect. Who now knows you lied to her about that. So you're weeding out women that believe in women's rights, conservative values, and that dislike lying and "testing" people. This seems like kind of a bad idea, you're kind of just going to be left with religious women that are going to be testing you.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:38 PM
9

Or you could just, date a normal woman. I feel like people here are seeing the examples of bad things that could happen and deciding based on that to never fly on a plane who's manufacturer has had a crash.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:34 PM
4

Honestly, that sounds terrifying to sign or do. I would 100% be terrified of them planning something sketchy. Except maybe in bdsm. That sounds like something someone would do if they're planning on doing something they know you won't like.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:32 PM
1

I mean, just don't touch people unless you know that they're okay with that. Male or female I don't want someone putting their hands on me knowing that such a large percentage of people don't wash their filthy mitts.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:23 PM
-1

Why would you want women to have the same sentences as men? That's kind of shitty. You should want men to have the same shorter sentences. If women in an area have it better than you why would you prefer to bring them down instead of bringing men up? I don't support giving women the same sentences as men, because that system that men are given longer sentences is unjust. So remove the male penalty, don't just pass it to the next group so everyone suffers equally.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:16 PM
-11

It's probably mostly because they have to be paranoid of bad actors, when you're battling day and night against oppressive systems, it's really hard to differentiate between good and bad actors. It's easier to deal with what's in front of you right now and then take up the reins for other issues after you've solved the wage gap and women not being taken seriously in the workplace. There are limited resources you have to evaluate and deal with problems.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:03 PM
12

We were in a pretty big uproar about catholics raping little boys, it's just that people tend to focus on the groups suffering based on the greatest number of oppressed and extent of oppression.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 06:58 PM
-1

So, in the same vein no defense of meninism will ever be justified for the acts of terrorism committed by them? There's a reason I don't use incels when talking about mens rights, they are a mens right movement if you look at their views. They're shitty and would make great examples of meninists going too far or extrapolating to say that they are the representation of the movement, but I don't use them because it's not productive to dismiss people based on what the most radical groups have done.…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 06:55 PM
0

Not all women can take contraceptives, and at least in america there's a growing conservative movement that right now is effectively banning abortion without technically banning it. Contraceptives also aren't 100% effective, one of my aunts was on it, but they still ended up pregnant. It's effective, but not very effective, and it puts all the onus on the woman to avoid consequences instead of being shared with the man. There are male contraceptives, it's not all on the woman when it comes to pr…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 06:51 PM
4

If their ideas on how to support and protect women does not heavily include the woman's opinion on the matter, and a lot of the things you think are support damage their positions in life, then maybe just, don't. It's an option to just treat them as a person. That doesn't mean that you don't come to their aid if you hear them being mugged, it means you also come to the aid of men that are being mugged at an equal rate.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 06:41 PM
-2

Not all women can take contraceptives, and at least in america there's a growing conservative movement that right now is effectively banning abortion without technically banning it. Contraceptives also aren't 100% effective, one of my aunts was on it, but they still ended up pregnant. There will always be a small percentage of people that take advantage of good, but that's not justification to take it away from people that need it. Removing child support or making it even harder than the usual m…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 06:24 PM
-1

WW2 was one of the greatest times for encouraging equality. It made it clear to people that women were just as capable as men. The white feather movement seems to also be a pretty good example of how fragile masculinity is, if a single feather is enough to make you go to war. There was a lot of success during those times, if not in policy, then in culture.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:28 PM
-2

By default, yes it would be mostly women, because the men were not there. Women were not allowed to fight, so they had to fulfill support roles. They were expected to both be the mothers and the workers. From what I could find, it seems that the purpose was to create outrage among men so that men had to listen to the movement after women's rights issues were ignored by the other major political parties. It also seems to have abruptly stopped after they succeeded in their goals, and was a splitti…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:08 PM
-1

I think it's pretty clear by how many people complain about taxes going towards helping people, that we can't actually rely on good will and charity to fix our problems. Productivity is not some gold standard, I'd rather single parents be stay at home to have more time to raise their children than working themselves to death for some "wring every ounce of labor out" and then not having the energy or time to raise their kid. This obsession with productivity is toxic, we already produce well more …
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:24 PM
1

Blame men for... what? What am I blaming them for? You guys have such a weird victim complex sometimes.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:17 PM
1

It was WW2, everyone ridiculed and belittled you if you refused to fight. It was ww2.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:14 PM
-7

What's up with this anti-communalist mindset, if people need help to raise a kid, they should get that help. Screwing over the children doesn't seem very good for society. The real focus should be on ensuring single dad's also get equal access to these benefits as a woman in a similar financial situation. Also, you shouldn't be angry about taxes helping people, you should be angry that they're being spent on things like F-35's so we can show them off to other countries instead of using that 1.5 …
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:29 AM
2

This, like, what? Who can just stop working for 18 years besides the ultra rich? Also, I've noticed a lot of anti-communalism here. People hate when they have to help people, they complain about child support but don't want taxes to pay for it. As if it would be a bad thing for taxes to go towards the next generation of children instead of wars.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 06:50 AM
2

I think they thought it'd get you off the street faster, and have less chance of being overheard.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 06:43 AM
0

Where are you getting these numbers?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 11:46 PM
5

I was going to go into a field that made a lot of money, and then I realized that buying things doesn't make me happy whenever I had some to spend. So, I'm training to be a therapist. Helping people not be bitter and depressed about the world makes me happy. When people are bitter and depressed, they pick something to be all the evil in the world and stop focusing on themselves. I'm not saying there isn't evil, it's just that everyone thinks they know the one group that's causing it all, and it'…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 09:05 PM
0

I'm not on either side. I want a rational informed compromise where everyone can be happy without flinging shit at eachother.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:50 PM
3

I support this if it's found out long before it's too late to abort. With the new heartbeat laws coming in, it's very possible the pair will not find out in time to come to an informed decision. Though, it's not like an abortion is an easy thing for a woman to do either. She has to deal with the consequences of either option, the man isn't the one that has to remove a partially formed fetus from their body, knowing they're the reason it's not growing anymore.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:47 PM
-19

Isn't it kind of weird that you guys are against women being always believed, but you always believe all men?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:37 PM
2

Thank you for introducing me to it. Men are harmed by exploitative capitalist practices too, not just women. Fight for better wages, don't just keep your fellow man down. The protest of not working until wages increase is the free market working.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:29 PM
1

Like I said, decrim is cool too. Prison is expensive, and we should probably reserve it for people that are actually damaging to society.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 07:34 PM
1

There is no labor shortage. When companies raise their wages, they get employees. There's a shortage of people willing to work for starvation wages. It's not a shortage because the price of a product(workers) is higher than what the buyers want to pay(employers). There supply has not gone down, the price of the supply has just gone up.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:48 PM
1

People aren't lazy, they just aren't willing to work for peanuts unless they absolutely have to or they'll die on the street. They're perfectly happy to work, which is why once businesses raise their wages people are suddenly applying to those businesses. It's a free market, and for the first time companies actually have to compete for workers instead of treating them like trash. You know, like how they fired everyone when the pandemic hit, the thing that required the government to step in becau…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:17 PM
2

That's for an escort, aka, the good ones. You can get sex workers a lot cheaper if you don't care about anything but sex. Also, why do you think they won't pay tax? Freelancers pay tax all the time.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:12 PM
1

who are your friends? I don't think any of my feminist friends would think that's sexist, that's so weird.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:09 PM
1

Construction kind of sucks ass tbh. It's full of bone heads that keep trying to kill you with their incompetence. Also, sugar daddies choose to stress out about keeping sugar babies happy, a lot of sugar babies would rather he chill out and leave her alone for a while. They're pretty varied though, some like 20 year olds, some like older women they can have a conversation with. A lot have tested my intelligence before meeting because they don't want the bimbos who they can't have intelligent con…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:08 PM
0

It depends on how you said it. Anything sounds bad when you say it a certain way.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:58 PM
1

I mean, pedophilia would probably cause some shaming, yeah. I don't think that should stop. I'm not saying to remove age of consent. And yeah, part of legalization is that it will stop being such a negative thing. But again, if you can choose not to date someone involved in the trade, women can also choose that. You shouldn't be shamed, but if you're allowed to have preferences, everyone is. Some people will always have traditional values.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:57 PM
3

I can see that, but the alternative is no access for the men that can't access it for free. Or I guess like, a government funded escort program. You could also do things like lessening stigma for women that have the same sex drive as men, and sleep around like men want to. Which would increase access, but would be more of a cultural thing. It might be unfair, but if the unfairness is inherent, then you should still find the most fair solution.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:52 PM
1

Decriminalization is cool too! But legalization is probably better for all involved.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:47 PM
1

We don't have a labor shortage, we have a wage and benefit shortage. When companies raise their wages, people go there to work.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:46 PM
3

"An equal world must be built by pushing women up and not taking men down" I feel like the MRA movement could use this. Push men up instead of attacking women.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:37 PM
1

Best tip, don't do anything stupid while drunk. It never ends well. Though ironically, if women had no significant judgements for being as sexually active as men, this wouldn't be a problem.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:34 PM
8

Work out the split now, try to get it to 50/50 and avoid getting lawyers into the negotiation unless she does. If she does, then get a lawyer. If you can, find a mediator. Once lawyers get involved, if you make any "unfair" demands, it could wreck your case in the eyes of jurors.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:30 PM
11

This, work out the split now, if you can get it to around 50/50 you're probably going to be in a better position than when lawyers get involved.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:27 PM
0

I mean yeah, starving lowers IQ. Because your brain isn't being fed. That's why I don't think IQ tests are truly accurate, because it's a compilation of dozens of factors irrelevant to someone's potential. 148 IQ does not mean I'm better or smarter than other people. I pick things up faster, but it doesn't mean I'll apply that knowledge better than the person that took longer to learn it.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:23 PM
2

If you decide your wife isn't satisfying you enough, leave. Cheating is bad because it betrays trust.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:18 PM
2

You're excluding women that pay for sex, and male sex workers. If you don't like the woman's prices, you can go check out if the male sex workers are cheaper.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:16 PM
1

Laws against prostitution weren't made to control men, men are the ones that made those laws.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:13 PM
2

Bonds are not sustainable, that's why we stopped. That was also the 18th century, things have changed in the world since then. Welfare is pretty important for society though, a society is only as good as it treats the bottom of the pyramid.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:11 PM
0

If that's what you wish to believe. But always remember to check your biases, the enemy are not always barbarians just because it benefits your rhetoric to believe them to be. Generalization based on specific examples is why MRA is seen as 100% a cesspit.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:09 PM
0

Doubt is worthless, unless it's paired with ensuing honest rationality instead of sophistry.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:06 PM
2

We do have instant tests for several panels, they're just pricey. I think every other week is a better schedule, unless the worker or john is high volume. I don't think we could find an ethical way of tracking if a buyer had casual sex with someone that isn't being tested though,
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:51 PM
1

I mean, the economy right now is pretty bad because we refused to do something about the pandemic before it became a major issue. I would prefer if taxes were put on the corporations without loopholes though. It's a lot easier for the government to get money that way than to get it through the individual. Bonds only work if the government is always bringing in money from somewhere. You're giving the government a loan that they promise to pay back with interest.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:47 PM
1

I mean, if you can have preferences to not date a sex worker, they can have the preference to not date guys that see them. Though, girlfriends are a lot cheaper than a good sex worker, it just costs more time. At least for me, 600 dollars is a lot more than being nice at dinner.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:43 PM
1

What are you even talking about, we tried to build a wall, we separate parents from their children, we keep people in cages and starve them. We are not pro illegal immigrants, lmao.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:39 PM
4

Because IQ doesn't measure accurately measure intelligence, if it did my 148 IQ would mean my opinion is inherently more valuable than all of yours.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:36 PM
9

I mean, IQ tests are also re-balanced if they show women as more intelligent usually. IQ tests are biased, because they're made by people. If you give one to a tribal african they'll score much lower than one born in america. If you tell someone they were chosen because they're already smart, they'll score higher than someone who you tell you are testing because they're dumb.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:33 PM
3

I mean, I have. That doesn't mean we ban sex though.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:30 PM
1

Legal to buy and sell, semi-weekly std tests. If a worker has an std, legal requirement to tell the buyer, creating markets where people with stds can also safely buy and sell sex with other people with that std. Most phones have thumb prints, so it would be pretty easy to set it up so that a thumb print will bring up your most recent test results on an app. Law enforcement helps if a worker male or female is abused, or swindled. Stop banks from cutting you off because you paid or were paid for …
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:29 PM
-2

I mean, I've been having rational discussions as a feminist here, and finding compromises where we both can agree on things. But I'm not going to ignore the bitterness towards women in general I see in the comments from the more unhinged members here.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:23 PM
-2

I'm a feminist and I've been rationally discussing with the more sane people here and finding compromises where we can both agree on things.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:20 PM
1

Strong regulation just means that the traffickers can offer a cheaper unregulated service. If you want to fight trafficking, first you legalize to bring them to the surface, and then you invest the resources in actually finding the traffickers. Being super strict with the actual legal workers just screws over the legal workers.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:18 PM
3

Divorced men were some of my best customers tbh, they're usually a lot more willing to pay more for niche services, and they tend to appreciate my psychiatric help in feeling comfortable in life and moving on without being bitter about all women because of it.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:14 PM
2

So why is it not exactly? Make your reasons known, or you're opinion isn't really worthwhile.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:09 PM
0

I feel like the issue is that you're trying to extrapolate a niche case into a big case, and saying all women because of a few examples. That's not very scientific.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:08 PM
1

I guess I'd be fine with brothels if there was a focus in protecting workers, male or female. If the brothel lets and STD slip in and infect a worker, there should be a payout by the person that owns it for the duration of the std.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:07 PM
1

I don't think it matters if it's good, if it's a net benefit for society. I don't like taxes, but, it's good for society if they're paid.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:05 PM
2

Why do people make money from doing anything? Someone wants something, another person can do something, so the person that wants it pays for a service.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:03 PM
-1

Same, as a woman I'd prefer if no one was drafted. It's inherently immoral to force someone to fight a war they don't want to.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:00 PM
2

I mean, if men need sex like that, then it's not any more exploitative than paying for food.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:58 PM
1

Why is it unfair? one person is horny, they don't want to go through the process of dating so they pay for a fast track.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:57 PM
2

Honestly, we should avoid big businesses taking control of it. Independents are a lot better, And yeah, some of my best friends were male prostitutes, they can be really chill
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:55 PM
2

In that case, the visitors should get an std test too. Though, why would the license be taken away if they have an std? Shouldn't guys with STDs be able to buy prostitutes too? Most people have cold sores or such, you're blocking off more men and women from accessing that market than you think. If they do have an std though, it should be an upfront info, people with stds need sex still too.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:54 PM
3

Well, if you're married you probably shouldn't cheat legal or not. That's kind of a shitty thing to do.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:50 PM
2

Honestly, I think the biggest issue that's causing a growing number of incels is the ease of finding echo chambers. You don't have to fix yourself if all women are evil and could never love you anyways, so you just get more and more bitter, which leaks into your behavior if anyone gives you a chance and scares them off.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:48 PM
2

Canada has the funniest laws for sex work. If a boy toy tells you 300 dollars an hour you're legally not allowed to haggle, which is the most canadian thing I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:44 PM
2

Legalize all sex work, not all sex workers want to work in brothels.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:43 PM
1

That's a new take, but I respect it as a compromise.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:40 PM
-1

I mean, idk. A lot of the male creators I watch say some very not PG-13 stuff, I think there should be a section of twitch for adults. Though, 13 year olds can watch porn if they want, I don't think there's a lot to protect them from anymore in the age of the internet, unless we make a separate internet for people that are not legal adults yet. Actually, that's a good idea, we should make a separate internet for people under 18
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:39 PM
2

You do know that, it takes skills right? The good ones anyways,
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:49 AM
1

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're saying, could you restate?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:47 AM
-1

Ironically, this is the same issue as MRA's lumping rad feminists into normal feminists to attack the group as a whole.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:09 AM
4

I mean, in america we have FOSTA, which was the anti-sex worker bill that made it harder to actually catch traffickers. Kind of just seems like trafficking is going to happen regardless of sex workers being legal, and if you want to deal with that you should focus a bigger force on sex trafficking. Though, in germany that just seems to be an issue with legislators not listening to sex workers when making their bills, and just being completely retarded when it comes to legislation.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:05 AM
2

So where you live, legalizing it reduces the demand?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:47 AM
6

Honestly, I don't think I've ever noticed women doing it in my circles, but they tend to be more leftist, so maybe that has something to do with it. Freedom of body, freedom of soul.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:46 AM
32

If you're going to require weekly tests for workers, you should probably also require weekly for visitors.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:22 AM
2

It being considered "standards" instead of preference is why men are shamed for seeing sex workers, in your stance that means the men necessarily have low standards for seeing one. Don't propagate anti-male rhetoric, if a guy wants to be with a hot girl that was a pornstar, he shouldn't be shamed for that.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:19 AM
3

If everything you're talking about is about "women negative", then yeah, you're probably going to get backlash. You can build up men without attacking women.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:09 AM
1

I mean, it would be easy to find support to legalize, since a lot of non-rad feminists support it. Regulating will be the hard part, since I can see the men in congress wanting to over-regulate, and independents don't want to work in a brothel where they make minimum wage at the end of the year. Legalization and light regulation(STD testing and such) means they can choose if they want to work in a brothel or take the risk of being independent, but that middle ground would be hard to reach.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:04 AM
1

What are you talking about? Women being accused of taking advantage of things like that are some of the most common criticisms made by men.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:32 AM
-25

Honestly, I wasn't expecting unilateral support for it here. I feel like if MRA's stopped focusing so heavily on how evil women and feminists are, a lot of their stances are pretty milk feminism, and could get a lot more acceptance.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:28 AM
1

Yeah, you said "which isnt to say I support or don't support it" so I was a little confused. Thank you for clarifying! I think even if we don't agree on the reasons for the laws, we can still probably work together to remove them if we both see them as unjust.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:11 AM
4

Do you have examples of what these articles you wrote were?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:09 AM
5

Yeah, I feel like there's a part to this story we're missing. If I as an adult woman went to a playground and asked if I could play with someone's kids they'd probably think I was a creeper too if I didn't have my own kid there.Maybe they realized when he left, he didn't take a kid with him, and started wondering why a childless adult is playing with 10 year olds. If I had a kid and a woman with no children started playing with my kids, I'd probably be kind of worried.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:06 AM
0

So, do you have an answer to the question?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:01 AM
1

It's hard to escape victimhood when your kind was subjugated for most of western history, and people deny that has any effects on you. You sound like the people that think black people have the same chances of success as a white person because slavery is over, but doesn't realize the mechanisms and stereotypes in place to prevent them from getting to the same power as their enslavers.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 04:36 PM
1

You didn't really make any points, besides it's hard to control virgins. My response was mostly a PSA to guys to learn how to please a woman, because the girl's they sleep with are probably pretending so they don't hurt his feelings. Virgin or not, most women that want sex are there for the intimacy, not the release. At worst, it just means women trade sex for intimacy at the most clinical view, and that's not really the manipulation people think of when they say someone manipulated them. Manipu…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:48 PM
2

Nah, but I know the people that do are reading this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:36 PM
0

I really wish redpill did that. But in practice, it tends to just people seeing one extreme is bad, and distancing themselves as far as they can from it, it's reactionary. They don't really realize that kindness isn't actually a bad trait, kindness is what turns being a dick about things to being assertive. You can't have a good blade without tempering. Also, if anyone needs help dressing, I will sincerely help. So many guys dress like their mom picked their clothes, or they didn't advance out o…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:08 PM
-1

Number two is where a lot of disagreement comes, there's a difference between assertive and being an asshole. You can be kind, and assertive. If a guy does things without telling her beforehand in bed, that's being an asshole. If he doesn't bring it up because he doesn't want to impose on her, that's too kind. People think that's the only two options, but there's also being kind and assertive, saying "This is something I want to do, will you try it with me?" Being assertive is good, being a dick…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:56 PM
2

What does that have to do with the question though? If being crazy is the turn off, and virginity or not has nothing to do with that turn off, it feels weird that it was inserted here just so there could be a negative to your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:46 PM
2

I feel like you're projecting how guys are with sex, to women. Most of us virgin or not, accept the vast majority of guys aren't going to give us an orgasm. That's a big reason that even with STD testing and birth control, women just don't want a hookup like men do. Guys get an orgasm and release, we literally get nothing except being looked down on more for having sex. Give a guy a dildo to use on us, and he'll be lost, he never actually thought about how to give women pleasure. A good tip I gi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:40 PM
2

I feel like you're answering a different question than was asked,
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:13 PM
1

Was it clear on the demographics poll, that it should be what you attained and not your goal? Numbers look slightly wonk with the age demographics. Also, I'm now curious what all the phd's and masters are in. Also, what do classes mean here? At what income after college costs in the poll are you considered middle class and not working class?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 07:53 PM
1

Right, and you said not having morals is a trait of men. So like, explain it, don't just get whiny and call me uneducated for asking you to explain that view.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 03:11 AM
2

Does, middle school tell people that men don't have morals? Why is a lack of morality Male?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 02:05 AM
3

Is this satire or serious, because it's kind of hard to tell sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 01:19 AM
1

We have a lot of courage, kinda how we got the right to vote. Also, there is no wall. It's just something men made up to devalue women and make them settle without guys fixing themselves up first. You want there to be a destiny date with the wall, because it benefits you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 12:07 AM
1

Men don't have morals?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 12:05 AM
1

I just wish they were at least consistent, everyone around me whines about equality of outcome in everything except them getting laid. Things need to be "fair" all the way through in a way that benefits them, so they can get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 11:33 PM
1

You mean morals that don't benefit you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 11:25 PM
2

Well, I obviously don't think that, lol. I'm basing my value off my current value, I exercised, I learned how to make high tier food, I like cleaning. Do you know how hard it is to keep a thin waist while having enough muscle to support me being able to knock down most interior doors?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 09:13 PM
3

Nah, my ideal outcome is being a nice housewife, but if I'm going to devote myself to someone, I want like, a good option. Not just whoever messaged me first, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 09:01 PM
3

Yeah, until they message me later wanting to get back together, after they realize that finding a woman that cleans, cooks, likes most of their hobbies, and wants to make them happy while being athletic and fit, actually was their top tier option. Guys think they have way higher value than they do, because they base their value off of "When I'm 35-50 I'll be rich and everyone will want me." They expect women to treat them for their perceived future value instead of their actual value.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 08:54 PM
4

It's virtue signaling to do what guys want, impressive. Red pill men can't even be satisfied when women act how they want us to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 08:47 PM
2

This, guys may think this helps their options, but if they see themselves as a good partner, they're hurting their chances of ending up with the girl they want by forcing exclusivity. A long time ago, the exclusivity was assumed because you already knew you liked this person because you spent time with them already. In modern online matching, the first dates are replacing that period of you figuring out who the other person even is. If I have to be committed to someone while figuring out who som…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 08:26 PM
12

This, a lot of dating is online, so it doesn't come with the old traits like you already knowing you like that person before the first date. It feels like guys trying to force the part that benefits them in a new dating scene where the cause for that part isn't there anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 08:18 PM
9

It's kind of a weird question. I don't think it's fair to commit to exclusivity, unless you're asking me to be your girlfriend. It's like asking to stop the marathon while you see if you can finish in it at all. To help you see it from my perspective, if I'm looked down on more for every partner I have, why would I stop looking for a partner while you try to decide if you like me? A better question is, if you're a guy and a woman tells you "Oh, this guy asked if we could be exclusive in dating u…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 08:16 PM
5

Guys: If a woman won't fuck me before a committed relationship, I'm out. Guys: If a woman fucks someone before a committed relationship, I'm out. Also, you kind of just, proved that it's a good strategy to not have sex at the start. It filters out guys looking for a pump and dump if you're interested in them for a relationship. Double also, I've never heard of this. I don't think any of my girlfriends have ever done this, and i'm the emergency contact they tell when they're going out with a stra…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 07:38 PM
1

Organic food can be cheap, poor men can be like this too. It's just that every time me and my friends take the leap like that, we end up with horror stories. Like my friend that came to visit america again to see a guy, and he just played WOW all day instead of having sex with her, or taking her out. Mine reliably chose fortnite over me. It's just not worth it to take the chance with this new generation, older men are just more mature and easier to be around. When they have misogynistic views, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 07:06 PM
2

Yeah, I'm literally the perfect women for them. Doesn't sleep around, doesn't dress in revealing clothes, submissive, wants to be a good housewife. But there's a 0% chance I'd want to be with a red pill man. Why would I be with someone that has such a misogynistic, angry worldview? And hates women that much?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 07:01 PM
10

Yeah, I think guys just want women to hit the wall at 30 because it pressures them into settling for men that won't get their shit together.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:43 PM
2

It feels like a man getting mad at women for not sleeping with him, and wanting some kind of strange revenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:35 PM
0

It also doesn't take any skill for a woman to have no partners, unless you mean the skill in not being raped or taken advantage of. What do you mean, "used up"? Vagina's don't get looser from having more partners. Also, you have a really skewed view of the ease of getting the high value established men as a woman. Especially because the actual high value men, don't want an 18 year old kid either unless they're just going for looks. They want someone that they can actually live with. Jeff bezos c…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:31 PM
0

The logic makes sense, when you realize red pill men usually think they're high value. But it's hard for them to come to terms with the fact that they just don't have the personality, charisma, looks, or wealth to be considered high value. So they blame women for only hooking up with guys that are fun to be around.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:22 PM
1

Men want virgins to settle down with, and they want sluts to hook up with. The world revolves around what they want. If women won't have casual sex with them, they blame women instead of themselves for not being able to compete. They go on tinder, and say "I'm looking for a good time not a long time", "We both know why we're on tinder", etc. But if the only thing a man is offering me is sex, why would I pick the ugly poor men that won't buy me dinner first? And if I'm losing social status by hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:13 PM
0

This, I don't like casual sex, I won't touch a penis for 3 months of dating while waiting for an std test. I still won't date a guy that wouldn't date women with high sex counts, just like I don't judge a guy for having low or high amounts of sexual encounters. If you judge a woman because she likes to have sex, then that's a personal problem you need to work through before you can be an equal partner in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:02 PM
-2

Men get mad when women won't fuck them, men treat women like garbage if they're too easy, men treat women badly because they feel inferior to their high value virgin wife. Stop blaming women for immature men having shitty attitudes towards us.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:56 PM
1

Men that go through the hoe phase are judged on their looks alone, so they're not going to have much success being a hoe. If 10 guys are going through a hoe phase, why would women pick the ugly guys that are too poor and unskilled to show them a good night out, if relationships are off the table. Guys want to compete in fields they're not competitive in, and get mad they don't get everything they want while not giving women what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:52 PM
-1

Maybe you're why people don't want to discuss with redpill, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:45 PM
1

I think that's just a result of cities being more densely populated, lol. You just don't notice all the women you don't find very attractive in that dense of a population.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:44 PM
3

This, they complain about less than 1% of women using welfare to be welfare queens, instead of the much higher number of rich people taking advantage of the covid kickbacks while firing the people they're being paid to keep employed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:41 PM
1

Welfare queens are rare though. People overhype the minority so they can take something away from the majority. Same with trans bathroom stuff, they look at a potential minority of people that will take advantage of it, while the majority that will use it just don't want to piss themselves or be harassed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:40 PM
0

Don't blame women for not being into you when you think women are incapable of using logic. In of itself, accusing the other gender of being illogical because they don't think like you, is illogical.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:38 PM
1

At the very least, red pill is a great look into men's psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:35 PM
4

I like that the study just shows people want to blame other people instead of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:29 PM
2

The bar is low, I just have the opportunity to date rich men. My standard is "Basic gentlemanly behavior without expecting sex, can take care of themselves, isn't bigoted, picks me over videogames", that's not a high bar. It just happens that those traits are fulfilled by rich men, and they're more likely to have the confidence to message me. Edit: Think about it like this, I don't buy organic because it's more expensive, I buy organic because it's better for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:24 PM
1

I feel like most of these people are commenting on tinder, where your looks are all that matter as a dude. Think about it like this, if I know I'm not finding a real relationship somewhere, why would I make my one night stand with a guy that isn't hot? Outside of the tinder world, looks matter a lot less. Like, the bar is low, and for me, it seems only older men can actually reach it. To them, I'm actually important to their life, they don't whine about having to pay for the first date or think …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter