TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Taladar Archive

View 0 posts and 108 comments by Taladar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
101

Before might be a good time too.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/21 09:59 PM
6

The reason we are not usually that honest is that revealing your honest goals and desires can also backfire, it makes us more vulnerable and sadly there are still people out there who exploit that vulnerability. I agree though, honesty is the best way to get the relationship you actually want, despite that problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 09:49 PM
2

If you think men are the only thing threatening women in this world you are very naive
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 05:24 PM
1

I think insecure men might go after younger, more naive women since they are likely easier to manipulate emotionally. Confident and or richer men who switch from a wife their age to younger women (and then to even younger women,...) might have other reasons though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 09:32 PM
1

Don't think of it as specifically wanting a huge age gap and more of enlarging the pool of potential partners which certainly would apply to the wary ones who are most likely insecure about their ability to get and retain a partner in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 08:25 PM
1

However, what is very likely, is that partners get divorced or otherwise separate long before reaching retirement age even if they are of a similar age.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 08:22 PM
0

That argument certainly works for ages up to about 25-28 or so when even the ones with the longest educational phase tend to start a career but does it work when pairing a woman that age with a significantly older male partner (say 40-45, still far from retirement age)?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 10:15 AM
2

Have you ever heard of divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 10:27 PM
6

So what you are saying is that you want your cat to be the headcat of all of Earth?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 06:29 AM
3

Oh, I did not intend to imply that the effect is not stronger now, just that it is limited to very specific parts of the internet, parts likely born from similar sources in the human psyche as lesser versions of this unhealthy obsession with appearance and comparing your life to other people's lives in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 11:06 PM
3

It is not the internet in general, just the places overly concerned with portrayal of people's lives and appearance, just like celebrity gossip magazines and modeling,... in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 10:16 PM
2

Well, most people probably assume you live in the civilized parts of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 01:37 PM
4

Well, increasing the rate of pregnancy is population control too, strictly speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 07:17 PM
1

She has the choice to make. Her husband does not. So strictly speaking she has more options than he does. He needs a wife to have children, she does not need a husband to pursue a career.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:57 PM
7

There were some "political lesbians" in the 2nd wave and other nonsense even earlier, it wasn't as dominant as it is now that most of the more serious issues have been rectified.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 03:44 PM
1

I would say it has little to do with the pay and more with internal competition between employees in the job as well as the speed of change in the career (e.g. high in IT with new technologies, mid range in legal jobs with laws changing over time, basically non-existent in some jobs that have stayed the same for decades) and the benefit you can get from more experience (if experience matters less gaining less of it by taking time off is less important).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 03:04 PM
6

Are you saying that you wouldn't have a handicap in your career if you took off a few months two or three times when compared to a coworker who performed equally well but did not take that time off? I would say that yes, those employers exist, but they are incredibly rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 09:12 PM
3

Well, she could be working and not have children. Being able to make that choice is a privilege in itself if you have limited funds.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 09:00 PM
5

Only in countries like Germany (where I live) where the state forces employers to act as if that handicap did not exist. Besides, what about those months of time off work around the birth of each child if the father is the one not working and staying at home?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 08:55 PM
3

Not really, usually it is the woman's biology who causes that. Can't have a well paying career if you interrupt it for a few months (possibly multiple times for several kids) and you wouldn't want to rely on a single income from a career handicapped like that when starting a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 07:22 PM
9

Meanwhile even the poor stay at home mom gets to procreate without having to earn the necessary resources from the rest of society herself. Her husband likely does not have enough money to go out alone or have fun either and he does not even get to see his own kids for most of the day. Of course she is worse off than the rich guy or the rich mom but is she really worse off than a guy of comparable social class/job qualification/income level/...?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 04:31 PM
2

I am not the person who made the original comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 08:21 PM
6

There is also a difference between never going out and doing anything and never going to bars or other crowded events.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 07:40 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfLnFVzfKBs This seems to suggest they have some rather huge issues in society as well.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 08:17 PM
-2

I wouldn't quite go that far but the exceptions are people who would be labelled creepy by 99% of humanity.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 04:07 AM
2

So what is productive about sports? Sailing? Collecting anything? Building model train landscapes? Really almost anything we call a hobby is not exactly productive, the productive ones are the exception, not the rule. You might also want to watch this video that addresses the topic of the worth of video games in people's lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 09:36 PM
1

That way parents would have even more control over the exposure their kids have to porn at a young age. The world should not be built around making parents' lives easier, in this case or in any other.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 10:08 PM
1

Yes, it all very much feels like OP posted this after some personal experience and is now looking for validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:38 PM
1

So the parents either "stay together for the kids" and there is a constant attitude of passive or not so passive aggression at home because the parents hate living together or they divorce and the father can't see the kids any more? I really don't see how even the kids benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:24 PM
2

The whole post feels like something from one of those people who plan out the age when they want to be married, the age when they want children,... before even having a partner and who just look for a partner filling that husband shaped hole. In other words, someone who lives in a simplistic fantasy world akin to a romance novel or romantic comedy, not in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:20 PM
1

There's no guarantees till there's a ring on it. Given divorce exists, what kind of guarantee are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:14 PM
1

To be perfectly honest your relationship sounds awful and you should not consider marriage. You seem very incompatible, there is no trust and communication, you begrudgingly do things that are major life decisions for each other after it is demanded with an ultimatum. This does not look like it will end in a happy marriage. Of course that is only the impression I get from the limited view of your comments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:12 PM
1

Or perhaps he left because she wasn't the woman he thought she was. This works both ways. Or perhaps there just wasn't enough communication to figure out what kind of person the other one was to figure it out faster.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:07 PM
1

Not necessarily. There is such a thing as relationship experience and each new relationship teaches you some things that might ultimately improve a long term relationship once you settle down.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:05 PM
2

Living with a man without being married is risky Marrying someone without first living with them is even more risky. You know almost nothing about a huge chunk of their life and behaviour and whether you are compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:48 PM
1

One could also argue that the people who see their relationship is going nowhere before getting married are handling it better than the ones who marry and then divorce three years later (or worse, emotionally break up but stay together for the children a few years into the marriage and are miserable for the next 20 years).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:46 PM
1

Judging by /r/deadbedrooms stories lack of sex in marriage is often more a matter of one person enjoying sex more than the other, not of one expecting sex without putting in any effort. In situations like that I believe that providing sex is a mandatory part of the sexual exclusivity expectation of a relationship. You can't expect to both provide no sex to your partner and for them to not have sex with anyone else just because you like sex less (or not at all). That said, that should happen in a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:41 PM
6

You should also teach your son to respect women. Both this and the gender-reversed version can sound and be sexist even if "You should teach your kids to respect people" is not.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 11:56 PM
1

It's entirely possible this guy was a genuine asshole Quite possibly but the consequences of these kinds of allegations these days are so severe I wouldn't even wish them on genuine assholes.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 07:16 PM
2

Think of it as "About 39% of women who had a career before having a child do not return to that career afterwards but just get some sort of part time job" and it makes a lot more sense.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:55 PM
9

I think it depends a bit on the kind of preference. A political preference like "don't take politics too seriously" or "don't ignore politics completely" is much more reasonable than a political preference like "believe in all the same things I do".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 06:01 PM
1

I think anything that disqualifies an extremely high percentage of potential partners is plain dumb. Basically anything else is fine though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 05:55 PM
9

It also sucks for people who understand marketing but are merely disgusted by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/18 12:50 AM
-2

Okay, that was maybe badly put by me. I meant the one I mentioned first.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:09 PM
11

you guys I am not actually from the US.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:02 PM
-6

Even if you got statistics you could not trust them since the psychology of both states is fundamentally different. In one case your parents did something irreversible to your body, in the other case you could achieve the former case any time you wanted. No matter what you think about circumcision you can hardly call those two symmetrical states.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 10:21 PM
377

Because Kellogg thought it was a good way to keep boys from masturbating.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 10:15 PM
3

Why should someone be respected for risking much for all the wrong reasons?
/r/MGTOW16/08/18 05:50 PM
2

What's wrong with the world? David Mitchell had something to say about that one
/r/MGTOW16/06/18 04:15 PM
2

I would agree with you until a few years ago. Right now awareness for the importance of free speech seems much lower than even a few years ago. Guilty until proven innocent (or just plain guilty no matter what you can prove) seems quite popular. Evidence-based arguments are frowned upon as ideologies are on the rise on all sides of the political spectrum, willingness to compromise is very low. The willingness to use violence against people who just use words is quite high too at the moment, agai…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/18 11:48 PM
2

or to just lock up every accused without trial. What makes you think that wouldn't just lead to an extreme increase in murder of potential witnesses?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/18 06:48 PM
-8

Guns are probably one of the biggest things people fear that can be made so much less scary with just a little bit of education on the subject matter. How does education about guns help anyone become less scared of people crazy enough to shoot you (or stupid/clumsy/... enough to do so by accident)? The only way a different perception of the details of guns would make that scenario less scary would be to to convince people the primary purpose of guns was not to harm or kill, which is a ridiculous…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:26 PM
1

As far as careers are concerned parental leave is a big delusional lie. You can write fiction into law that parental leave should not affect your career but it will never happen that way. Someone who hasn't worked for a few years or even just a year is not equivalent in career terms to someone who worked the whole time.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:36 PM
1

You do raise a good point about the choice vs. voluntary career interruption. Lets say we count having a child (even though that is of course a choice too) as being forced to interrupt the wife's career for a certain amount of time (pregnancy, birth, breastfeeding,...) and possibly being forced to interrupt one arbitrary partner's career for a certain amount of time beyond that (taking care of the baby to the point where it can be entrusted to a third party service). Many people still interrupt …
/r/MensRights14/02/17 06:52 PM
1

Why would we even guarantee a "reasonable wage"? Well, I was thinking for a limited time after the divorce, enough to find a new home, apply for a job,... Certainly not for an indefinite time.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 06:00 PM
12

unless it can be argued the divorcee would maintain that level of lifestyle had they not got married, and for whatever reason can't now, Why should it matter whether they could maintain that lifestyle if they had made different life choices? That is an entirely hypothetical situation. I would say a reasonable wage would work either way.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 08:18 AM
17

He is no longer the husband post-divorce and I highly doubt the post you responded to was referring to post-divorce situations anyway.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 08:13 AM
1

I take it you have not been to /r/wholesomememes ?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 05:52 PM
2

Isn't it hypocritical to hate all feminists then? We're not all the same. I swear. It is a group defined by a shared aspect of its members' world view. That is very different from a group defined by something its members have no control over. Quite frankly I am a bit baffled by the fact that there is anyone left who doesn't consider the term 'feminist' completely burned and worthless for people who want actual gender equality due to the vocal hate-filled part of the movement.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 10:18 PM
5

Oh, I totally agree that what she did was wrong. I just don't think Yahoo was in very good shape even when she took over.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/16 04:00 PM
32

Well, to be fair Yahoo has been scraping along just this side of failure for a decade or so now.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/16 12:40 PM
9

I think /u/Ragnrok's point was more that Star Trek has not traditionally been about explosions and shooting as a primary, first method of solving your problems.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 04:27 PM
-2

Judging by the higher number of theatres on the other movie it should be about the same per theatre.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 04:13 PM
3

Well, it might win one of those "worst..." prices. I would nominate them for "worst marketing campaign" if there is such a thing, or "worst fanbase relations" though Paramount/CBS with Star Trek seems to be a contender for that one too after that recent fan film rule release.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 04:08 PM
1

Presumably the two hours of video before and after the alleged rape time have something to do with the dismissal of that idea.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/16 09:32 PM
7

Most very conservative religious systems have low divorce rates. Not because nothing is wrong but because nobody is allowed to say when something is wrong (or it is highly discouraged).
/r/MensRights26/06/16 07:59 PM
2

I don't even think homo- or heterosexuality plays into it that much. Rape it primarily about power in many cases, not so much about sexual attraction.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/16 02:39 PM
6

Not quite true. Logically speaking there is also the option that the first part of the sentence never happened. So all the 0 times he saw a female miner in a mine everyone dies.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 05:52 PM
2

Wearing a suit tells the world, "Take me seriously, because I am being serious and I consider this important." Wearing a suit tells the world "We care more about the impression we give to others than about what we are actually doing".
/r/MensRights22/08/15 01:19 PM
4

So, exactly the same as MGM? I think you meant to write FGM here?
/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:54 PM
1

Funnily enough I disagree with you for exactly the same reason. I don't think parents should be able to force medical procedures on their children or prevent them from receiving them. In particular I think religious objections to or causes for medical procedures and homeopathy and that kind of thing instead of proper medical treatment are a much bigger problem than the very rare case of the majority of medical researchers being wrong on something. Why is harm due to inaction worse than harm due …
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:37 PM
0

And in cases when there's a disagreement between doing something and not doing anything, the "not doing" should prevail. I disagree. But we probably mean the same thing. I would say whatever the medical community agrees on should be the default, e.g. vaccination, blood transfusion,... are all on the doing side of your equation but i don't think a single parent should be able to keep their child from the benefits of standard medical procedures.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:56 PM
52

Sounds a little like a publicity stunt for the movie.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 06:46 PM
39

Don't be silly. Prostitutes don't get to charge indefinitely for limited service.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 05:22 PM
13

What if they have no intention of remarrying?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 05:21 PM
65

Don't be silly. There is always upper management as an option.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:05 AM
1

You are argueing from the flawed assumption that what the US military is doing at the moment is some kind of vital task. I know the military likes to indoctrinate their soldiers top think that this is true of 100 percent of all soldiers do, instead of being the exceptional case.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:11 PM
-9

It is not just any job, it is a job with a high chance of death, mental or physical disability and literally no time at home. There are plenty of jobs for young parents to choose from, they don't need to pick literally the worst job they could.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 04:04 PM
-7

Nice strawman version of my argument there. There is a spectrum between spending no time at all with your child over spending normal working hours away from it to spending all your time with your child. I merely pointed out that the literal "no time at all" option should be held against you.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 04:02 PM
1

If you are worried about your looks being a primary factor of people's perception of you try meeting them in online places first where they get to know your mind before your body.
/r/seduction11/06/12 03:29 PM
2

It also helps when talking to people to expect nothing, then you can be pleasantly surprised if you have an interesting conversation, if you make a new acquaintance, a new friend or even more. If you expect everything from the start you will be disappointed 99 percent of the time.
/r/seduction11/06/12 03:25 PM
-20

In what way exactly is spending no time with your child at all, risking your spouse becoming a single parent,... something that shouldn't be held against you in a custody case just because it is the military that is keeping you busy and risking your life?
/r/MensRights11/06/12 03:14 PM
10

Which is kind of retarded when you think about the fact that there is no real difference between one bought in a shop and a second hand one.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 12:45 PM
2

I don't think most men have to worry about rape by physical force but there are some situations where rape by dependency (e.g. female boss) might be a concern.
/r/MensRights18/03/10 12:53 PM
5

They probably implanted little sensors in soap that checked a genetic sample to determine the gender and a sample of the dirt to determine the kind (e.g. baby shit or garden mud). Otherwise I wouldn't know how Dove would factor into this kind of study.
/r/MensRights14/03/10 04:22 PM
1

I think the intonation would take care of that problem.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 05:53 PM
2

I meant if all the partners in your lifetime combined represent a 5% chance to get one of those, i.e. one in twenty men is affected by one girl trying to have a baby with him without his consent. That sounds about right if you include the married type mentioned in the article.
/r/MensRights18/02/10 11:20 PM
3

While that is certainly true if you have even a 5% chance that one of your partners over the course of your lifetime would be one of those crazy women who think it is okay to force you to have a child without your consent that would still be too much in the face of a total inability to stop her from forcing that child upon you.
/r/MensRights18/02/10 07:23 PM
13

Things like depression or alcohol shouldn't be usable as an excuse, they should just send you to a prison-like clinic instead of a prison without therapy for the same period of time someone without the condition would have been.
/r/MensRights28/01/10 03:34 PM
7

What do you propose to do about it? As the OP states, those words are already unacceptable in polite and even much less than polite circles.
/r/MensRights24/01/10 11:16 PM
1

I think there are certainly parallels to draw with collapsing societies. Birth rate is the least our worries there though. Corruption of leaders and superficiality in the population are probably the more problematic parallels.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 05:35 PM
2

All of those were in times when societies relied heavily on numbers, One farmer, one carpenter, one blacksmith, one soldier,... could not do the work of two no matter how good he was at his job. Technological change in the last century or so has made this less and less true.
/r/MensRights21/12/09 09:37 PM
-1

He mentions birthrates below replacement level which just means that we might end up with a world population we can actually feed without relying on chemical petroleum based fertilizers and monocultures of the most efficient plants (leaving us wide open to problems down the line once some illness or parasite attacks that plant). Something in the 1-2 billion range sounds about right.
/r/MensRights21/12/09 09:35 PM
6

The author seems to share the common misconception that high birthrates are always good and low ones always bad. At a time of overpopulation lower numbers of well-educated (because there are more resources to spend on each) children might actually be the smarter way to progress.
/r/MensRights21/12/09 06:42 PM
10

To me the movement you describe is worthy but isn't feminism.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 08:15 AM
3

It isn't just that though, it also creates doubts that genuine rape victims have to face. The victims of false rape accusations are really genuine rape victims and the accused in the false rape case.
/r/MensRights08/09/09 06:30 PM
4

Microcredit is a charity scam. Not more than most other charities. For example the last time I donated to the red cross they started spamming me (by snail mail) with so much crap that they probably used up my whole donation just for that. The repayment of loans is always below par, even when there are no natural disasters in the area. If it wasn't they could get a loan with a regular bank.
/r/MensRights08/09/09 12:13 PM
-2

Even if both can be equally good at it that doesn't mean that the average skill level is the same for both genders for each and every field. The most obvious reason for this is that there are, on average, fewer girls playing with technical toys at a young age (building bricks,...) due to parental gender bias.
/r/MensRights23/08/09 10:42 AM
4

I don't see why you would bring TV into it even later on. I mean the occasional series as he describes isn't so bad but you shouldn't even get a kid started on actual TV, i.e. zapping around until you find something you like. I wasted so much time with that as a kid.
/r/MensRights27/07/09 09:15 PM
1

I believe they should split it all up. Make one contract for e.g. control when I am in a coma or similar situation, another for financial security in case something happens to me, another for proper treatment of children,... Why does it have to be a package deal? Maybe I trust my best friend more about medical decisions, maybe I would like to see the little neighbour girl I treat like a little sister to benefit from my retirement savings if I die early,...
/r/MensRights27/07/09 07:16 PM
1

If a child is purposefully brought into this world, than the parents should promise to be together until death do they part. I disagree. I think staying together when you start to resent and hate it can be just as bad or worse than a divorce. More important than staying together for the sake of the child is treating each other with some basic respect. Parents hating each other are just bad for the child no matter if they still live together or start completely new relationships.
/r/MensRights27/07/09 07:14 PM
5

Well, if she has a good reason like that and her husband doesn't even know about it don't you think that points to other problems in the relationship?
/r/MensRights24/07/09 09:25 PM
1

You never know what you're going to hit and no matter what it'll be thousand and thousands of dollars in medical bills. Luckily that isn't an issue in the civilized world...
/r/MensRights18/07/09 10:41 AM
5

I think it does a pretty good job at a worst case scenario because, while it won't happen to you all at once (unless you are extremely unlucky) every individual thing he lists might happen to you and it is better to think about it before you marry instead of only considering the best case scenarios.
/r/MensRights14/07/09 07:44 AM
3

It isn't well stated. It might be true and it might be important to say it but it is, above all, not well stated. He makes way too many enemies with other statements in it, people who might agree with him if he concentrated on the one topic at hand.
/r/MensRights11/07/09 08:26 PM
1

Your theory sounds good until you realize the crime we are talking about for women are false rape charges. The men in power certainly want to avoid that type like the plague.
/r/MensRights18/04/09 12:34 PM
27

Castration probably cuts down the risk of infection with STDs too, that doesn't mean it is a good idea...
/r/MensRights26/03/09 12:38 PM
1

First you rape that person, then you try to rape her again but the second attempt is unsuccessful?
/r/MensRights28/02/09 01:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter