TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TalentedObserver Archive

View 0 posts and 64 comments by TalentedObserver on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Used to be Leftist, then they went crazy, then my life story and priorities evolved, then the political polarity flipped anyway, so now consider myself Rightwing.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:34 PM
5

It’s just cos they found today the body of that lady who was tragically murdered. Need to look like they’re doing something…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 12:03 AM
6

Actually, China is proportionally even fatter than America. Just saying.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 05:40 PM
9

Stop using Wikipedia. That shit has gone full librard and is no longer trustworthy in any meaningfully objective way.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 02:36 AM
0

In my view, by the time you actually wrap your head around circumcision, all the other stuff becomes “alright fuck it what now??” (ie significantly less important)
/r/MensRights01/01/23 02:35 AM
91

No: main reason being Kim’s sextape.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 10:36 AM
2

It’s all you will ever be able to do on the loss of a child.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 10:24 PM
3

Take comfort in your wife wanting to build a family with you in good faith. Take comfort in your daughters. Take comfort in your role as father to them.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 07:35 PM
1

Well shucks 😚
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:51 AM
3

Yes, OK. Now imagine that for all aspects of life, not just romance… Yup, welcome to the rest of the world bro. (P.S. I’m gay and can confirm that most of what you’ve said is true for us outside the US, too)
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:29 PM
8

Right, I can imagine. I mean, as a gay man, I think that being able to articulate what a woman is is significantly more important than gay or trans rights beyond basic freedoms. I know that, in my country, the odds of me being attacked for being gay are low, and that people would come to my defense. I also know that, when I walk down the street, lots of people are probably thinking “fucking queer” in their head about me. I don’t need them to change their mind to live my life to the fullest. All …
/r/MensRights25/11/22 06:12 PM
9

Question: do people in your country have any difficulties in answer the question “what is a woman”?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 05:47 PM
1

A “paper abortion” is common where you’re from…?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 05:32 PM
14

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:57 PM
1

Question: if females’ abortion rights continue, but males’ remain non-existent, what then?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:40 PM
37

Question: if females’ abortion rights continue, but males’ remain non-existent, what then?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:40 PM
2

As I wrote elsewhere on this sub, I guess the problem for straight guys is that they could risk their own “eligible mate” status disappearing if women saw them being friendly with gay men, because this could imply to the woman’s mind that they’re also engaging in gay behaviour themselves. This might be why there’s such a strong evolutionary drive for boys to police gayness and enforce heteronormativity amongst ourselves. However, this is, first of all, not insurmountable. Specifically, a HUGE am…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:27 PM
3

I guess the problem for straight guys is that they could risk their own “eligible mate” status disappearing if women saw them being friendly with gay men, because this could imply to the woman’s mind that they’re also engaging in gay behaviour themselves. This might be why there’s such a strong evolutionary drive for boys to police gayness and enforce heteronormativity amongst ourselves.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:07 PM
3

Correct, 100%
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:02 PM
1

It’s not specifically useful to men’s rights, and to extrapolate societal demands based upon it would be, indeed, propaganda. However, it is definitely scientifically relevant. It is a well-understood fact that the default sex is female. There are very good evolutionary reasons for this within the development of mammalia.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 01:56 PM
7

I do not support a woman’s right to an abortion, but for reasons unrelated to men’s rights specifically. However, if a woman’s right to an abortion is permitted, even if curtailed, then the same right must be extended to men in the form of a “paper abortion”, as you note. And that IS a men’s rights issue.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 01:50 PM
4

Comment karma is at -100 on this one. Don’t even waste your time bruh.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 01:47 PM
6

Why not start with less-invasive methods (steroidal creams, for example) before whipping out the knives? i.e., if this encourages a move away from recommending circumcision for phimosis, at least other than as an absolute and extremely rare last-resort at the top of the escalation-chain, and to funding only more conservative treatments first, that’s still a meaningful improvement in the welfare and treatment of men in the UK.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 01:21 PM
15

In the UK it’s almost always as a religious ceremony, not in a hospital, anyway. This refers to a very small number which are done “for health reasons”. The point being that this logic is now admitted to be rightfully meaningless, as there is no “health reason” which is helped by this mutilation.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:41 AM
0

Lol no
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:18 PM
-4

Because they’re not our brethren lol. That’s the point.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 06:22 AM
-2

No, I don’t agree at all. Gear doesn’t make a soldier: a man’s spirit does.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 06:21 AM
-7

No. Women are not as capable as men in physical combat. If you truly think they are, you are not better than the blue haired Twitter crazies.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:35 PM
1

Dude, I don’t often say this, but I think that other guy is a Russian troll, and that you’re just wasting your time as a result.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:33 PM
-15

Guys, I’m Ukrainian, and I can tell you that our concepts of gender are not like in the West. We do not have nearly the level of toxic feminism and “equality” of discourse as you. Here there is still an idea of men and women being different and having concomitantly different responsibilities and standards of conduct. Men are supposed to protect women. Women are supposed to serve their family. This sub can often lose sight of this and fall into the same trap as the feminists thinking that the sex…
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:25 PM
6

I really don’t think the issues with those two leaders of the party were down to their gender lol
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:18 PM
1

My point was that, I don’t think the original comment to which you replied reflects a ‘failure of empathy’, as you put it. The reason for this is that, bundling MGM in with FGM is ineffective, insofar as feminists are uninterested in sacrificing social space within this pet issue to genital autonomy for men, too. Instead, an ‘unempathetic’, specifically mens’ rights-based approach based upon the legal issues of MGM, specifically, and seeking to resolve this ‘sui generis’ is needed.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:46 PM
1

MVP rite here!!!
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:41 PM
-8

Except not. Your characterisation reflects neither the actual incidence of the practice on the ground, nor the state of the laws regarding its regulation.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:40 PM
10

Dis guy rite here!!! ☝️☝️
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:38 PM
1

Yes but, from the men’s rights perspective, the scenarios are not equal. The women in the article above were able to retroactively revoke consent to be penetrated by a trans man. Men are not able to retroactively revoke consent to penetrate a trans woman.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 03:51 PM
2

Ask the women from the article posted, as they’re the ones pressing charges…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 10:16 PM
2

No, but I think the men’s rights issue is in parity of legal processes and also for an updated definition of rape. The example you cite here would have basically no legal standing at present.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:08 AM
1

Hahahaha no, neither of those for me lol
/r/MensRights27/05/22 05:34 PM
1

Absolutely not: dildos feel horrible, and I refuse to use them, ever.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 05:07 PM
2

Oh right, ok but I don’t think the consent law is suitably bidirectional for a man to retroactively revoke consent to have penetrated someone, anyone, period. For example, a guy can’t say he was “assaulted” because he fucked a girl thinking she was a rich heiress only to later find out that she was poor and therefore that she “falsely represented her identity”. This is essentially the line of argument you’re representing in the above comment. The only reason that the women discussed in this case…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:52 PM
1

Yes, that’s precisely my point. So I would definitely feel 100% and immediately if I were being penetrated by a prosthetic.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:46 PM
1

Tricks me into having sex with him? What the hell does that even mean, practically-speaking?
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:02 AM
2

Not sure I understand your point, if I’m honest.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:01 AM
3

Well I’m a gay man and have been penetrated, too. And the sensations are by no means “the same”. Even two natural penises can feel so extremely different that I could identify whose was which one blindfolded. So no.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:00 AM
9

You cannot, because a man actively penetrating cannot be raped, according to the gynocentric law as it stands.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:21 PM
25

Retroactive revocation of consent by the women. This happens all the time in other cases which constitute a more ‘obvious’ men’s rights violation than here.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 02:26 PM
3

The problem is retroactive revocation of consent, as you duly note. That is the true Men’s Rights issue. The “inverse”, as you put it, is to my mind totally incoherent, insofar as the biological man did not himself penetrate the trans woman. The prosthetic penis argument is plausible and relevant but really goes back to the first, which is the true salient point: retroactive revocation of consent.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 02:24 PM
19

Not only warm/cold, but the entire feeling of the whole thing would be instantly and dramatically different.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 02:19 PM
-1

Yes, because intactivism is dominated publicly by the Left and/or by people who are not relevant politically for various reasons: old hippie moms, old hippie dads, fringe Jews, and gay men. This is not an effectual coalition for achieving legislative progress on this issue. That is precisely why I advocate strongly and repeatedly for cleaving intactivism away from its Leftist and hippie connotations and for recasting it somehow as a purely Rightwing issue which can appeal to mainstream younger p…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:48 AM
1

Because you’re misplacing your call to action on the Left, when instead we need to reframe bodily autonomy as an exclusively Rightwing/Conservative/Republican issue.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:11 PM
-1

This is your answer right here.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:40 PM
4

Right, of course, and I don’t disagree with you. I’m just saying, even if conscription is unfairly applied to men only, that “modern women” are willing to volunteer in solidarity in some numbers, surely far more than in previous eras.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 09:46 PM
1

It’s worth noting that in Ukraine, although not required, many women are staying and taking up weapons to fight, too.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 09:25 PM
2

If it turns into WWIII, all bets are off. But most likely that would just turn into a nuclear apocalypse pretty immediately, anyway, so you wouldn’t have to worry by then lol
/r/MensRights25/02/22 06:02 PM
5

I think scenario 1 is basically already the reality. Scenario 2 seems less likely in Western cultures. I don’t think women get along with each other well enough for that ever to work en masse lol
/r/MensRights21/02/22 07:21 PM
7

And you think divorce under Sharia Law compares to that under Western Law…?
/r/MensRights21/02/22 07:19 PM
1

There’s also the idea of just a fundamental difference in modality between men and women: “Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus”, etc. However, in my (gay) opinion, this results in men and women being poor matches for each other on this basis and both failing to fulfil the other’s emotional needs (my parents, for example). From my gay perspective, a more “natural” pairing would be men with men and women with women. Obviously individual attractivity is highly relevant here, so of course I woul…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 05:37 PM
1

Freud himself was actually deeply against circ.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 11:40 PM
2

Interesting!
/r/MensRights17/02/22 03:32 PM
1

“Evaporative cooling”? Lol
/r/MensRights16/02/22 05:53 PM
5

Perhaps not the focus of this sub, but I’ve definitely had success as a gay man in this regard (talking here about “normal” settings comparable to the straight bar OP describes). It’s definitely a bit of an art, but it can be learnt and done with some dependability. It’s really mostly about confidence, strategy, and persistence.
/r/seduction29/01/22 11:06 PM
1

It’s just literally mind boggling to me that this person can write “women are the only ones who get to back to back try out both and decide which one they like more”. That’s a pretty strong instance of internalised-misandry for an MRA group…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 01:02 AM
1

You do realise that there is such a thing as gay men, right?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter