TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TangoZulu Archive

View 0 posts and 333 comments by TangoZulu on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

Be careful. She's clearly making a macabre museum of celebrity mannequins created out of human flesh skinned from random DM's. Block immediately and report to the authorities.
/r/seduction07/07/21 01:00 PM
1

OK? But does that set you apart from other men her age, who also have a car, a home, money and a promising career? Look, you may be a great guy. But you have to realize that in essence, you're asking a woman to risk several years of her prime dating time on you instead of someone else. So she needs to see something in you that she can't get more immediately from someone else. At best, you're an investment at this point. You're asking her to basically put her future (marriage/kids... etc) on hold…
/r/seduction06/07/21 03:58 PM
1

There is no right or wrong in relationship preferences. But that doesn't address your question; that's just virtue signaling. What do you bring to the table that an older woman would value? That's the answer to your initial question. Find a way to add value to her life that she can't find elsewhere and that makes you worth investing her prime dating years in.
/r/seduction06/07/21 03:42 PM
3

Men and women typically value different qualities in a long-term mate. Those girls ARE bringing something to the table that the older men value (i.e. youth, good looks, sex). So again, what do you bring to the table that an older woman would value, that sets you apart from the millions of men her age? Even if we set aside any differences in attraction, you're not particularly good looking ("average" by your own account), you don't have money or a car. Do you have any bright future prospects (tal…
/r/seduction06/07/21 03:34 PM
1

Not to be harsh, but what do you have to offer a woman in their mid-twenties to make a long-term commitment to you? Women in their mid-twenties (if they are even looking for an LTR at all) are looking for someone to build a life with together. Not a teenager to support. That means you need to bring something to the table. She is most likely finished with college, starting a promising career, may even own her first house, is likely interested in travel (or other expensive activities), and is thin…
/r/seduction06/07/21 03:11 PM
10

Fat girls need loving too.
/r/seduction12/06/21 10:33 PM
55

Stall tactic. She knew you were into her, she just didn't expect to be asked out in that moment. Probably wasn't prepared to reject you right then and there and panicked. Either that or your texts weren't as clear as you think. Or you went too long without asking and she figured you were too scared and never would. Lots of possibilities, but if she didn't immediately accept, she's just not that into you. Move on.
/r/seduction30/05/21 03:52 PM
22

Creeper 101
/r/seduction30/04/21 11:06 PM
0

Ok, I’ll admit I came off strong here and maybe it was over the line. But honestly, what advice are you hoping to get here? You already know what you need to do, there’s no great mystery. Say “thank you”. Smile. Start a conversation. Compliment her back. Ask her out. You already know the answer, my man. You just need to get out there and do it. This isn’t about how you were raised. That’s a cop-out. No one was raised to pick up girls. You know you need practice being social, so go talk to people…
/r/seduction24/04/21 06:41 PM
0

If someone can’t even utter a simple “thank you” to a girl, maybe they aren’t ready for seduction. That’s some serious social anxiety that probably needs therapy. Which is fine, but not really what this sub is for.
/r/seduction24/04/21 06:29 PM
0

Good lord some of you are completely socially inept. It’s just a girl, not some mythical creature. Stop putting attractive girls on a pedestal and treat them like normal human beings. You’ll get a lot farther.
/r/seduction24/04/21 06:18 PM
4

Dont worry I aint a creep Said every creep ever. Leave the girl alone, weirdo.
/r/seduction22/04/21 09:29 PM
3

The answer is no.
/r/seduction11/12/20 12:10 PM
2

Maybe she’s fat now too.
/r/seduction20/08/20 08:18 AM
2

Honk-honk.
/r/seduction01/08/20 01:38 PM
5

Honestly, if you're overthinking where you should keep your hands while speaking to a woman, you may in fact BE socially awkward. Don't worry about your hands (just keep them to yourself). Focus on the conversation.
/r/seduction01/08/20 01:38 PM
4

It's based loosely on a stat from an OK Cupid Trends report released by the company in 2015 that stated that women rated 80% of the men on the site as "unattractive". Don't argue with me about methodology... etc., because I'm not defending the study, it's conclusions, or the people's interpretation of the data. I haven't even read it and quite frankly don't care to.
/r/seduction23/07/20 11:37 AM
63

Guilt has to be proven in a court of law. Innocence has to proven in the court of public opinion. The social media lynch mob destroys lives for entertainment.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 10:07 PM
1

You do realize that all women, regardless of age, have different preferences, right? That they are, in fact, individual human beings with their own thoughts and feelings. But chances are, yes, your small dick will be a huge disappointment.
/r/seduction21/05/20 03:54 AM
-1

More like go to r/teenagers. Jesus Christ what dumb question.
/r/seduction11/04/20 10:19 AM
1

I don’t. No girl wants some thirsty, dirty-dick mouthbreather rolling up on her in a fucking pandemic. Dude needs to get a grip.
/r/seduction10/04/20 04:37 AM
3

Of course it’s negative, people are fucking dying and the economy is crumbling because assholes like these are too fucking selfish to stay inside for a few weeks. This shit will never end if people don’t take it seriously. You can go a fucking month without getting laid, assholes. Grow the fuck up.
/r/seduction10/04/20 03:17 AM
6

You don’t. Stay the fuck home, dumbass. Getting your dick wet isn’t worth putting lives in danger. People like you are the reason this shit is getting so out of control. Grow the fuck up, asshole
/r/seduction10/04/20 03:01 AM
3

How about tell her you’re not getting together because we are in the middle of A FUCKING DEADLY PANDEMIC. Stay home and stop spreading shit around, dummy.
/r/seduction09/04/20 05:26 AM
4

“ Ever since we’ve been talking I’ve managed to keep things clean and haven’t made any sexual advancement so now she’s making the first move.” Then... “ I got pissed thinking that she was playing games and forgetting that she had been drinking. To follow up with that, I then sent a mean message that caused me to lose everything. ” YES, you did fuck this up. You followed the typical nice guy playbook, trying to nice your way into her pants and then losing your shit on her when it didn’t work out.…
/r/seduction09/04/20 12:06 AM
6

For all the dorks on Reddit that claim they want women to be more forward, this is what happens. It’s never the perfect girl that will be pursuing you; it’ll be the crazy whack jobs that threaten suicide and end up boiling your pet rabbit. It’s actually much EASIER to be rejected than it is to be the one doing the rejecting. Now you know how chicks feel when they are incessantly pestered by creeps, incels and nice guys trying to all get in their pants.
/r/seduction07/04/20 02:50 AM
1

Really don’t think he meant anything negative, it probably just came out awkwardly. Assuming beautiful is a step above pretty, he probably was just thinking “you’re so pretty... no, that’s not enough... you’re beautiful.” Don’t dwell on it, he totally digs you regardless.
/r/seduction02/04/20 08:06 AM
4

No it’s not a neg. He called you pretty and then beautiful. I don’t see any hidden negative in there at all. You’re overthinking it. Accept the compliments and be happy; he seems really into you.
/r/seduction02/04/20 05:41 AM
1

Disagree with everyone that says to ignore it or act like nothing happened. That’s a weak move. If a guy is calling you out in front of a girl, it’s a power move on his part to make himself look strong and you weak. He’s literally shit testing you. So treat it like any other shit test. Own it. Agree and amplify. And most importantly, you need a comeback that puts the dude in his place. Don’t turn it serious and get butt-hurt (weakness), but a solid burn that turns the tables and makes the girl l…
/r/seduction29/01/20 06:03 AM
1

Concealing you’re intentions in dishonest at best and predatory at worst. That’s not seduction, it’s manipulation. You probably still believe in negging. Creepy, dude.
/r/seduction03/11/19 12:10 AM
2

Conceal your intentions?! Flirt indirectly?! That’s NOT game, that’s cowardly Nice Guy bullshit. May as well suggest “pretend to be her friend, wait until she is emotionally vulnerable and then try to manipulate your way into her pants.” I sincerely hope no one is taking advice from you. You’re a creep.
/r/seduction02/11/19 10:56 PM
1

Ask her out?
/r/seduction02/11/19 06:11 PM
3

It's really not just the drive distance, as the Ladies Tees make up for that. But the distance they can hit the irons is insane and gives a huge benefit. For example, an approach shot from ~180 would be a 4-iron for the average LPGA player, while the average PGA player would be hitting a 7 or 8 iron. The difference in loft between those clubs is huge, meaning the women would have much tougher time controlling the landing where the men can drop a nice lofted ball onto the green and stop it on a d…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/19 04:55 PM
1

It's a shit test. Agree and amplify.
/r/seduction26/06/19 06:29 PM
3

Just because she enjoys doing some things with you and enjoys the attention you give her doesn't mean she's willing to dump her BF for you. She has established her boundaries (sports not dinner) in an effort to keep keep this as friends and not cross lines into romantic activities. She is telling you her boundaries and you need to accept them outright. This doesn't mean continuing to use the friendship to try to get in her pants. If you can't be friends with her, and ONLY just friends, go no con…
/r/seduction24/06/19 07:02 PM
0

Women give this "advice" to men because it helps *women*.
/r/seduction23/06/19 04:39 PM
1

"Just be yourself." Thanks, mom.
/r/seduction23/06/19 04:35 PM
15

This will only work if you make "Honk-Honk" noises while pretending to squeeze them. Good luck!
/r/seduction22/05/19 01:45 PM
2

Pro tip: If a reply starts with "And...", the post is generally agreeing with you. Just because they added an additional point of clarity doesn't mean they are disagreeing. Damn Reddit makes people defensive.
/r/seduction11/05/19 12:17 PM
27

Bring a banana to class and eat it in front of him. Message sent!
/r/seduction03/05/19 02:16 PM
1

It's meant to be a general rule of thumb, not taken literally. Obviously not ALL women are like that.
/r/seduction23/04/19 05:17 PM
3

She was just curious; she had never seen a micro-penis before.
/r/seduction18/04/19 02:13 PM
3

Is that your opener? No wonder it took 2400 tries.
/r/seduction18/04/19 02:05 PM
1

So it took you 2400 approaches to understand not to just treat girls like nothing more than a phone number with a meat hole? Good work, detective.
/r/seduction18/04/19 01:38 PM
1

Found OP's other account. Embarrassing.
/r/seduction15/04/19 10:35 PM
4

incel
/r/seduction15/04/19 05:50 PM
5

First step is to stop blaming other's for your own shortcomings.
/r/seduction15/04/19 05:05 PM
2

Absolutely not. That's Nice Guy behavior and will lower your value in her mind.
/r/seduction07/04/19 03:45 PM
5

Why bother? She made her intentions clear; just fun and maybe FWB. She already made it clear that seeing other people is the plan. Asking her this after the fact only appears passive aggressive and manipulative. You already know her answer.
/r/seduction05/04/19 12:44 PM
5

With Amazon Prime it's free, but you have to wait two days.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/19 04:30 PM
1

No need to White Knight for m'lady, OP says she's good with it.
/r/seduction08/03/19 02:30 PM
0

I would guess that she made the agreement to open up the relationship.
/r/seduction08/03/19 02:25 PM
3

This may hurt to hear, but you only have yourself to blame. You had a year to make a move but didn't because you were scared. Not scared of ruining a friendship, but scared of being rejected. You're hiding behind "jeopardizing our friendship" because you've "always been attracted to her" and "feel like I’m in love with this girl". So your friendship wasn't an honest friendship to begin with, you were hoping to use your friendship to slow-play her into a romantic relationship. That's dishonest an…
/r/seduction06/03/19 04:57 PM
5

Cringe.
/r/seduction26/02/19 06:05 PM
1

-Charlie Sheen
/r/seduction16/02/19 10:11 PM
5

Dude, think for a minute. She broke up with you a couple of years ago for being too clingy, yet here you are blowing up her phone and posting a novel to Reddit about this girl. You say you want her to see your changes, but who's kidding who, you are still being crazy clingy and she sees it. She is being distant because she wants you to leave her alone but she is too afraid to tell you outright. I recently helped her out with her rent so I figured that would get me on her good side but nope I’m S…
/r/seduction13/02/19 08:00 PM
3

The girl is "trickle truth-ing" him with answers of "idk". Look, I don't disagree with you. My point is you are approaching the situation as him confronting the guy for wronging him. I'm saying there IS a benefit to knowing the full situation; first, getting closure from knowing the full truth, and second, learning the realities of how women will trickle-truth a tough situation and being able to apply that knowledge moving forward. It's not about fighting the other guy for your honor.
/r/seduction13/02/19 03:10 PM
2

I think his point was less "confronting" the guy and more contact him to see if the girl is being honest about the situation.
/r/seduction13/02/19 02:10 PM
4

Lift with your legs to avoid back injuries.
/r/seduction12/02/19 08:29 PM
6

If you're asian, a scale of 1-5 would suffice.
/r/seduction07/02/19 03:12 PM
8

Deal with it like any other bully, hit back harder. In this case, it's verbal bullying so destroy her with words in front of as many people as possible. Humiliate her publicly and she'll slink back into whatever hole she crawled out of.
/r/seduction30/01/19 08:01 PM
3

Taking her back WILL NOT rebuild the attraction. It will only make her think you're a chump. She may get pumped-and-dumped and come back to you for security and validation at some point, but you are setting yourself up for her repeating the cycle over and over. Because once you set precedence, she will know that there are no consequences for her in your relationship. The ONLY way to actually rebuild her attraction is to cut her off and start dating other women. She needs to see your value throug…
/r/seduction14/01/19 04:15 PM
23

Dude, this is called a "soft break-up". She wants to date/sleep with other people but is trying to keep you as a backup plan. Don't fall for it. Move on like a man.
/r/seduction14/01/19 03:56 PM
1

We all have things about us that we believe is "unattractive". Your choices are to hide them or own them. Women like shoes, but one thing they like more is self-confidence. If you need the shoes, it is what it is, so own it. Have fun with it when it comes up in conversation. Give the shoes a fun "backstory" or customize them (paint them, bedazzle them, whatever). Make them a conversation piece, however ridiculous. Just don't be ashamed of having to wear them. Shame is the turn-off, not the shoes…
/r/seduction09/01/19 04:52 PM
-2

Only betas lick pussy. /s
/r/seduction28/12/18 07:26 PM
8

Shit test FAILED.
/r/seduction27/12/18 04:27 PM
-4

Are you incapable of having fun or making people laugh in general? I highly doubt it.
/r/seduction23/12/18 05:55 PM
1

Of course guys shit test other guys. It's a way to see where a person "ranks" within a tribe, or whether a new person is worthy of joining the tribe. "Shit talk" is verbal sparring; testing your mental worth as much as a fight tests your physical worth.
/r/seduction11/12/18 03:45 PM
4

So just to be clear... you hate women because you texted with a woman on a dating app, she was by your admission maybe "somewhat interested" but maybe not, so you stalk her to the mall and get upset that she is living her life?
/r/seduction08/12/18 04:05 PM
20

Plot twist: she also lied about her age; you fucked a 15 year old.
/r/seduction08/12/18 02:25 PM
11

So your "subtle way" is hold her money ransom so she has to go on a date with you just to get paid back? Here's a hint: if you have to cloak your true intentions, you're being deceitful and manipulative. Do you think women find that attractive?
/r/seduction04/12/18 02:54 PM
15

It’s only awkward if you make it awkward.
/r/seduction01/12/18 05:43 PM
4

You have a crush on her but ask her to be friends? That's being untruthful and manipulative. You need to be upfront about your intentions instead of trying to deceive your way into her life like a con man.
/r/seduction29/11/18 07:39 PM
2

It's a shit test, bro. She's trying to figure out if you've really changed or are just faking it. The only way to win is to NOT SHOW THAT IT BUGS YOU. Agree & Amplify or brush it off and don't respond at all.
/r/seduction14/11/18 06:01 PM
3

You honestly sound like you have a massive chip on your shoulder. Yes, standing up for yourself is a good life skill to learn, but you need to calibrate that shit. Sounds more like you “punished” this girl for the failings of your past and the transgressions of others. Kinda like a girl that treats a new boyfriend like shit because her previous boyfriend as an asshole.
/r/seduction19/10/18 03:25 PM
-2

Settle down. Practically EVERY post on Seddit is generalizing the interactions between women and men; there will always be outliers. In general, he's not wrong. If you've ever read AskWomen, you'd see that one of women's biggest complaints is that young men seem to be learning about sex exclusively from porn, leading to exactly what he's saying. Stop being so defensive. If it doesn't apply to YOU, great, you're ahead of the curve of your peers. Congrats.
/r/seduction09/10/18 04:24 PM
26

There is an old saying, to paraphrase, that "90% of sex is between the ears". At the end of the day, that's really the key. Get outside of your own head, and get into her's. Read her cues and mirror her vibe. You will still most likely have to lead the encounter, especially with a new girl, but you should always be assessing her emotional state and moving forward in the direction that she is guiding you in with her energy. And that energy can change as the encounter progresses and she feels more…
/r/seduction09/10/18 02:37 PM
57

Women will try to co-op anything to further their own needs. Big Dick Energy started as a girl descriptor for an attitude that they find attractive, which is basically masculine energy. So of course women will try to then twist it to be ‘toxic’ if it doesn’t further their needs. But that doesn’t change the fact that it’s the masculinity itself they find attractive. They are just hard-wired to try to break that masculinity down into a provider role by shaming the very thing they are attracted to.…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/18 01:46 PM
5

Seems more about having Abundance mentality . It isn’t about having a literal big dick (or good body), it’s about having an energy or aura about yourself that signals to them that you’re not needy. They equate it to having a big dick because they envision men with big dicks as the alpha males that all the girls flock to.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/18 01:41 PM
11

Absolutely. Never use self-deprecating humor with a woman you’re trying to sleep with. Ever. Even as an obvious joke, it puts you in a bad light and there will always be a question of “how much truth is in the joke” sitting in the back of her mind. Even subconsciously it will create doubt in her mind. And it makes you look like a pussy.
/r/seduction30/08/18 11:35 PM
1

Please. He “doesn’t want a girlfriend” be cause he’s shy and is scared to talk to girls. He’s using it as an excuse to not have to deal with his shyness. But the larger point stands, overcoming shyness now will make his life a lot easier as he grows up.
/r/seduction30/08/18 09:30 PM
1

Never use self-deprecating humor. Especially around women. It doesn’t make you look confident, it makes you a chump. Learn a quick wit and how to counter their shit talk back on to them. Verbal judo, man. That’s how you win. By having a quicker, sharper wit than they do.
/r/seduction30/08/18 12:10 AM
2

No, because as a man in this world you have to go out and get what you want. Nothing, NOTHING, is given to men. The point isn’t about girls. If you you want anything in this world, as a man you have to go out and get it instead of being “shy” and hoping it just falls in your lap. Grow up.
/r/seduction29/08/18 11:23 PM
2

He did take his passengers safety seriously. He remained calm and navigated them through the situation instead of allowing panic to overtake the group. There is a reason they advise remaining calm in a stressful situation. Panic leads to bad and dangerous decisions. Clam allows you to focus and navigate the situation safely.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/18 01:52 PM
2

It all comes down to how you project your frame. You “flipped out on them”, which showed fear and panic. So they didn’t respect your leadership. If you had remained calm and authoritative instead, they would have most likely fallen in to your frame and conducted themselves more responsibly.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/18 01:47 PM
3

I think the difference is that while a relationship may have expections agreed upon by both parties (monogamy for example), its the relationship that is “transactional”; your love itself doesn’t need to be. Even if the relationship doesn’t work out, you can choose to walk away angry and filled with hate, or you can choose to still love that person while accepting that the relationship with them just didn’t work out. There is no condition on that love itself. Even if you never see her again, you …
/r/TheRedPill25/08/18 09:52 PM
10

Well, judges/ prosecutors are elected so I understand that she had to save some face in light of #metoo and the pressure to believe all victims claims. Also, she did pay service to the men accused as well. At the end of the day, they did the right thing and should be commended for standing up for the true victims (the men accused).
/r/TheRedPill24/08/18 10:25 PM
5

Yes it’s your ego. Sounds like you are proactively protecting yourself from feeling regret/jealousy if it works out with another girl.
/r/seduction18/08/18 07:11 PM
2

Backing this up even further, a girl you want to sleep with isn't one of your "bros". Treat a girl like a friend and she'll consider you a friend and not a sexual partner. Be honest and up-front about your intentions (to yourself and her) and act accordingly.
/r/seduction18/08/18 03:43 PM
16

Nice virtue signaling! Go show this post to your feminist friends and you may get a whiff of some overgrown pussy. Assuming you can even smell it through all the Patchouli oil caking their hairy legs and armpits, that is.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 10:31 PM
85

Because women’s solipsism dictates that they can’t seperate what they find attractive in a man from what men might find attractive in a woman. She projects her wants onto men because she can’t see past herself. That’s why every female Tinder profile outlines her great career, owning a house... etc. Those are what she is looking for in a man, so she assumes that’s what men are looking for in a woman.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/18 12:33 AM
37

Yet if the 35-yo embodies the feminine qualities outlined in the article and the 20-yo is a masculinized “strong independent woman”, I’d take the 35-yo in a heartbeat.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/18 12:25 AM
8

aka Alpha Fucks / Beta Bucks
/r/becomeaman12/08/18 03:25 PM
0

You're not very good at it. Keep practicing.
/r/seduction03/08/18 06:17 PM
9

Don't you think that the results of that study may contain inherent bias in the answers due to the fact that a portion of the respondents were found via an ad placed in "an anti-circumcision newsletter"? Women subscribing to an anti-circumcision newsletter would hardly seem an unbiased opinion, would they?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/18 02:47 PM
1

My understanding is clinical “psychopaths” physically DO NOT feel empathy for other people. Choosing to not act upon feelings of empathy is a far cry from physically not being able to feel it all. A psychopath learns to emulate empathy and other emotions to blend into society or manipulate other people to their benefit, but the don’t actually feel the emotions they are displaying.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 02:42 PM
5

This is true. I would fully expect a girlfriend to bail on you in rough times before a close friend would. I think the difference is that women only value relationships (and men) for their utility, whereas men will remain brothers through good times and bad.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/18 07:23 PM
3

It wasn’t an objection/correction, you were virtue signaling. Nobody here cares about that shit.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/18 06:38 PM
0

You need to take a break from Tumblr, chief. It's seriously melting your brain.
/r/seduction27/07/18 06:43 PM
3

Stop propagating this bullshit that men are clueless and somehow can't pick up social cues. Millions of men are having sex every minute of every day. Stop hiding your failures behind excuses and learn better social skills if you're not succeeding with women.
/r/seduction27/07/18 06:32 PM
1

Because a man that is scared to simply approach a woman shows that he lacks bravery and confidence; that's not a man that is fit to protect and support her and her children. If a man is scared to approach a woman, how will he fare in other areas of life that require bravery? If you can't face a woman in a social setting, how can you face a threat? Or ask for a promotion or raise? Chances are, he'll wilt like flower in the face of true adversary if he can't overcome something so simple and conseq…
/r/seduction27/07/18 06:13 PM
1

God this thread is pathetic. Maybe girls don't ask you out because you act like scared little boy around them? Or because they can tell that you're so needy you'll hump anything with a wet hole? Seriously, instead of wishing for the world to change for you, be a man and go out and change the world. You can't control other people, only yourself. Your focus should be on that.
/r/seduction27/07/18 06:06 PM
1

Part of being a man is facing your fears and taking risks. That's how our ancestors built the fucking world. If you're too scared to make move for fear of rejection, you've failed the most basic life hurdle and don't deserve to succeed. This goes for everything in your life, from chicks to jobs. Make yourself a better, stronger man instead of wishing and waiting for the world to change to appease your cowardice.
/r/seduction27/07/18 05:56 PM
3

This. The biggest problem with our current social climate is that we are raising a generation of terrified man-children. Good lord, guys. It's just a girl. Quit hiding behind excuses (can't read social cues... etc) and go fucking talk to her. You're a fucking man, act like it.
/r/seduction27/07/18 05:45 PM
13

Agree. The problem with that part of the OP is that it assigns a false motivation to the bully. When a kid bullies another, his objective is NOT to make the victim stronger so they can contribute to the tribe. What the bully is doing is simply picking an easy target to boost his own perceived value amongst his group. Bullying is just as much of an "achievement simulator" as porn or video games are. They bully the weakling to create a perception of power that they truly don't wield. Instead of ac…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/18 02:49 PM
3

This is why women account for upwards of 60-80% of all purchase decisions. They are more governed by their emotions. And why men need to “market themselves” in dating. A woman’s decision to have sex with you is simply a purchase decision her part. Appeal to her positive emotions, and you’re that much closer to closing the deal.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/18 04:06 PM
23

He doesn’t care until he loses half of his shit thanks to “no fault” divorce.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 09:17 PM
6

My go to reply is “Don’t make promises you have no intention of keeping, lady.” with a sly smile. It’s a playful way to call them out on the silliness of making such a declaration before the interaction has reached the point of being physical and shows that you’re socially aware of the shit test at play. Works 60% of the time every time.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/18 11:56 AM
1

They are projecting their insecurities onto you. Tell them that only insecure people worry about how others live their lives.
/r/seduction17/06/18 02:15 PM
5

You’re using logic (who looked at whom), when the rule is expressly about emotion (his stare made me feel uncomfortable). There is NO WAY an accuser gets punished for staring back.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/18 12:37 PM
1

I think #7 means you have to be clear in your romantic/sexual intentions lest you fall into the friend zone.
/r/seduction30/04/18 08:59 PM
2

After giving this some more thought, I'm going to backtrack a bit and suggest that maybe this isn't an issue of "technique" after all. Sure, there are guys out there that wouldn't know the difference between a vagina and urethra, but chances are that is not you. For women, attraction and arousal are largely driven by emotion. And just as in dating, the man is expected to take the lead in sex and set the tone of the encounter that elicits the proper emotional response. Women tend to be passive in…
/r/seduction30/04/18 04:29 PM
13

This is true. Ever notice that the app will tell you "there's no more people...", but if you go into your discover settings and change even one perameter (even if you make your search pool smaller by further limiting age/distance) it will immediately come up with more people that fall within your original discovery settings? So yeah, the system definitely limits potential results after so many swipes.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/18 02:16 PM
10

What’s the question? They want to get to know you in a safe, public space first. Nothing weird, manipulative or confusing about that.
/r/seduction31/03/18 01:42 PM
1

Firstly, using a compliment as an opener sets off a woman's "Creep Defenses" from the get go, every time (unless you're incredibly attractive, but if you're here I'm guessing you're not Brad Pitt. No offense). Change your approach and build attraction before giving out compliments. Second, who gives a fuck what White Knights or anyone else thinks? What's the worst that can happen, she calls you a creep or laughs at you? Who cares? You can't control other people and their opinion has NO BEARING o…
/r/seduction27/03/18 06:08 PM
3

Get off of Tumblr and stop letting a small percentage of women dictate how you "can" and "can't" interact with 51% of the population. It's not a matter of having to view women as "under you", it's that you're already viewing them as "above you" instead of just being equal. We're all human with our own individual wants and needs; neither sex is innately above or below the other. Once you truly internalize that, you'll realize that individual rejections are just that, one individual's opinion. Not…
/r/seduction27/03/18 05:53 PM
10

Your Trump analogy fails in that he did pull millions into his frame and this proven by the fact that he won the election with zero political experience. Just saying.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 04:33 PM
2

It's a perfect example of how powerful oneitis can be. Plus, it actually makes some sense in context; the OP was facing the loss of a loved one so he was clinging to someone else he loved and had lost.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/18 01:29 PM
1

This is borderline creepy. She’s married with a kid, man. Let her go. Delete her number, unfriend her on social media if you have to. Pining over a married woman isn’t healthy. Get out, meet some new women, and forget this one until you get your head in a good spot.
/r/seduction01/03/18 12:49 AM
7

I got 99 problems and a bitch ain't one.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 03:36 PM
9

Easiest way to get over the last girl is to get a new girl.
/r/seduction20/02/18 08:12 PM
1

You need to realize that girls typically avoid confrontation so if she didn't want you to touch her she would simply move her hand away first, and if you keep doing it she may eventually say something serious about it. In your example, she was just teasing (shit testing) you but didn't actually mind the kino. Don't get embarrassed, don't get defensive, don't be "joke mad and fake a fight". You need to OWN IT, be confident, and if she throws a test your way, playfully agree & amplify. Good luck!
/r/seduction20/02/18 07:17 PM
2

With all due respect, you say you know all this but you clearly haven't internalized it. There is no going back. There is nothing you can do to resolve your mistakes with your ex. She has been with you for six years; in many ways she knows you better than you know yourself. It's not what you want to hear right now, but you need to hear it and accept it. Clinging to fantasies of winning her back is self-defeating. She has made her decision and you need to respect that. It's the only way she'll re…
/r/seduction01/02/18 04:57 PM
7

Dude, you are being needy and emotionally manipulative. You can't make her "revalue you"; you can't negotiate attraction. You need to accept the fact that she ISN'T your family. She was your partner, and you are proving yourself to be a weak partner with the way you're acting. All this begging and saying things like "you'll never find a better man than me" is doing is further proving to her that she was right in leaving you. That's why she's saying that you "never should have been together". The…
/r/seduction01/02/18 03:49 PM
17

The entire metaphor of "spinning plates" is built on the idea of keeping multiple women in play at the same time. If you only have one girl in play at a time, you are, by definition, NOT spinning plates. A monogamous relationship is "a girlfriend", regardless of how casual it is.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 04:49 PM
3

The problem is that it's no longer an issue of "innocence" or "guilt". Those are legal concepts that are rooted in logic; to determine innocence or guilt there must be clear rules for what is legal/illegal, and there must be evidence "beyond a shadow of a doubt" as to whether those rules were broken. What we are seeing now is a set of "rules" that are based solely on feelings. The goalposts have moved to the idea of "emotional legislation", where the standard of whether a "crime" has been commit…
/r/becomeaman24/01/18 05:24 PM
3

But you DO care about driving her wild, you stated so yourself: Naturally, being attracted to this woman, and especially being turned on by her orgasms, I want to see her when she is at the height of sexual ecstasy. If I can't deliver that, then I imagine a scenario where that might happen. Listen, I am not attempting to put you down here. Insecurities are not always rooted in reality, so I'll defer to your word about your actual sex life. But examining the root of a fetish is the farthest thing…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 03:53 PM
2

You keep making the accusation that no one is attempting to "understand the mindset", yet I would question whether you have actually sat down and gave this any deeper thought yourself? All you seem to believe is that "it's just a random fetish, no big deal dude", which is about as "black-and-white thinking" as can be. Have you ever questioned whether this fetish is healthy for you? From your posts, you do seem to have a certain level of sexual anxiety about your size and abilities, so you retrea…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 03:11 PM
19

I believe it's a result of the systematic breakdown of positive male sexuality combined with the vilification of the "CIS white male" for all of societies ills. Add to that the fact that white (American?) males have no strong culture and male role models to look up to, and you have an entire generation of confused, brainwashed men.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 02:26 PM
1

What hubris. We can "manipulate nature" right up until nature sends a hurricane/tidal wave/earthquake at us to prove that we really are just "mere humans" after all.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/17 07:36 PM
22

I'm an "old guy" (over 40 yo), and I'm noticing that younger men (millennials) seem to deal with conflict more like women now. Back in my day, if you had a conflict with another man it would follow the pattern you describe. Nowadays, young men fight their battles socially; they manipulate friends against you behind your back, hamster the truth, play the victim... etc. And it makes sense, young men are growing up in a fem-centric world, and thus trading in their metaphorical swords for poison. It…
/r/TheRedPill06/12/17 03:25 PM
1

Firstly, marriage is not a biological urge. Marriage is a social construct. You can argue that "feeling secure and protected" is a biological urge, but marriage isn't the only way to achieve this. Secondly, why is it ridiculous to for a man to pose this question? Women no longer NEED a husband to support them. Add to that the emotional and financial costs of a failed marriage, and I'd argue that it's ridiculous to NOT have this conversation.
/r/RedPillWomen29/11/17 06:36 PM
1

He was a validation-seeker LONG before he was a politician.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 03:46 PM
73

The point is that she didn’t go to the hospital any more than I went to the moon.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 02:32 PM
3

It doesn’t make any sense because of the extremely negative connotations of the term Red Pill in our current social discourse. It would be akin to naming the album “Weinstein Blues”.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 02:29 PM
86

You have to remember that the world is a very different place than it was when previous generations were young. Advice comes from personal experiences, and their personal experiences come from a significantly different time. Doesn’t mean that they are selfishly “disregarding your well-being to continue the bloodline”. All it means is that the rules of society have changed since they were in the game.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 02:13 PM
76

Just because I tell you I walked on the moon doesn’t mean I’m really Neil Armstrong.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 01:45 PM
17

This. A woman’s SMV is (in her mind) is entirely based on the SMV of the men she can attract. So by dating “down”, all you are doing is raising her perception of her own SMV. If she is an objective “5” and you’re a “7”, in her mind she becomes a “7” as well. And since women will never be happy with a man “below them”, hypergamy will take over and eventually she’ll hamster reasons why she can do even better.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 02:15 PM
6

Don’t worry about it. The Reddit hive mind can’t think in terms of context and nuance; most just want a black and white list of doing A = Alpha, doing B = Beta. The truth is all actions come back to your Frame, and that’s scary for guys that don’t fully understand it.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/17 09:42 PM
10

I actually agree with you here. As with everything, it’s all about frame. Push the bitch back, tell her you’re going to eat that pussy because YOU want to taste her before you fuck her senseless. Keep it withiin YOUR frame; you’re not doing it for her but for yourself. That’s alpha, and she’ll cream herself before you even get past her knees.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/17 06:29 PM
1

Sounds like you need to make your intentions clearer. Flirt more with guys you’re interested in. There are tons of average looking guys out there looking for companionship. Perhaps you need to lower your standards a bit and find a guy that is a “5” as well?
/r/seduction22/11/17 12:52 AM
14

And even if she responded saying that she also had a great time, all she would have to do is later say that she felt fearful of you when she replied. That’s the insidious nature of the hamster, unfortunately.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/17 11:07 PM
1

In this example it’s counterproductive, though.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/17 11:00 PM
11

Gender studies has a purpose; at its core, TRP is gender studies. The difference is that liberal/feminist Gender Studies starts with a faulty premise (patriarchy, victim-hood) and reverse engineers the data to fit their agenda and narrative.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 09:52 PM
17

You accuse him of projecting, then try to make your point by projecting. Ironic.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 09:40 PM
1

Sexual harassment doesn’t have to be a repeated event; one single comment to the wrong person at the wrong time IS harassment. And the important part to understand is that breaking these “social laws” can come with severe penalties (loss of job, kicked out of school... etc. ) without any sort of actual legal due process. Just as the burden of proof is less for civil trials than criminal trials, the burden of proof in the court of public opinion is most often simply an accusation. Scary.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/17 02:10 PM
6

Them getting jealous initially is a shit test. How you react to the shit test determines whether it plays out positively or negatively.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/17 03:27 PM
3

Just like a woman to be born rich. AWALT.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/17 12:59 AM
20

And this is why I said below that it's a comfort test, not a shit test. Reading her talking points is basically a check-list of common domestic abuse warning signs. I AM NOT SAYING THE OP IS ACTUALLY ABUSIVE. But she clearly has been thinking (and most likely talking to her friends) and is hamstering the relationship to the point of her soon being a #metoo "victim". Look at her points: Controlling Behavior - U dictate everything and bitch about everything. Social Isolation - I have no friends. I…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 06:27 PM
1

Do you understand the difference between a shit test and a comfort test?
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 04:43 PM
1

Going to be honest here, sounds more like this wasn't a Shit Test as much as a Comfort Test, and you failed it hardcore.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 02:37 PM
8

Tell him you need help with your kegel workout.
/r/seduction07/10/17 01:21 PM
2

Stop worrying about the 'shoe on the other foot' stuff. Men are hardwired to protect a woman in need. Women are hardwired to find a strong man that can protect/provide for her. When bad shit happens to a woman, our instincts are to help and save her. When bad shit happens to man, her instincts are to find a stronger man, not stick by a weak (or injured) one. It's ugly and seems evil to the core to us, but that's evolution and biology for you.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/17 10:06 PM
25

Exactly. If you read her comments, she starts hamstering even more reasons why it's his fault. Started with gaining a little weight, then dresses poorly, then he sits around too much and she likes being active, then he doesn't have a drive to succeed. By the time she dumps him, she will have convinced herself and everyone who will listen that he was emotionally abusive. Anything to take the guilt off of her.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/17 05:37 PM
1

You're misunderstanding the advice. Being 'outcome independent' when talking to women isn't necessarily about giving you confidence, it's about NOT coming off desperate. Women want a confident man, not a drooling dog sniffing her crotch.
/r/seduction29/08/17 05:18 PM
11

"Repercussions "? What is she going to do, ground you?
/r/seduction29/08/17 12:02 PM
2

Of course, because those men were taught that "real men" have to repress their natural masculinity, only to find that everything they were taught was a lie.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/17 09:43 PM
2

It doesn't matter that women can get sex easily because they have different goals in sexual strategy. Ask any woman how easy it is for them to lock down a high SWV male into a relationship. That's their struggle.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/17 04:47 PM
1

"Sexual strategy" encompasses more than just how to get women into bed. It's about successfully navigating all interpersonal relationships and recognizing the innate differences between the sexes. Having sex IS a very big part of it, but it's only one end goal that fills under the "sexual strategy" umbrella.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/17 04:33 PM
39

Women want the Neo that is projected when he's in the Matrix; they want the good-looking badass in the trench coat with all the guns, stopping bullets in mid-air. They have no interest in the real Neo, the bald waif in the moth-eaten sweater with an ethernet cable stuck in the back of his skull.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/17 01:54 PM
1

They get to terminate and condemn him in this situation. He promises to take it and shut up in return for compensation. This happens ALL the time. This is normal business. What good is an NDA when the offensive document is already online for the world to see? The dirty laundry is already out in the open; Google only cares that everyone knows that this guy, acting alone, left the skid marks in the underwear. An NDA is for keeping internal issues out of public view. It was way too later for that t…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 10:54 PM
1

You have to realize that if they did what you suggest, they would be seen as being complicit in his "crimes". The only way out for Google was a very public condemnation and termination. As far as his potential lawsuit, even "10x higher" is nothing, literally nothing, to a company the size of Google. What's he going to get, ten million (maybe)? Fifty million (doubtful)? A hundred million (no way)? Sounds like a lot until you realize that even a small drop in Google's stock could result in the los…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 10:13 PM
1

I guess I'm not understanding exactly HOW you believe Google should have handled this any differently. Google found themselves in a PR nightmare. They cut ties with the "root of the problem" and positioned the company on the right side of political correctness. In a few days (weeks), it WILL all go away as far as headlines are concerned. They'll settle whatever lawsuit comes from the guy and it will be done. Hiding from it would only raise more questions, headlines and SJW outrage. Who cares if …
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 09:45 PM
4

Yes, I used First Mate in a follow-up reply. Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 09:23 PM
1

They couldn't buy his silence, the document was released worldwide before they took action. They HAD to have the public execution to appease the feminist outrage. I agree that it WAS personal. It had to be, the SJW's were out for blood.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 09:19 PM
1

The problem is that facing a wrongful termination lawsuit is much easier/cheaper than facing the feminist uproar if he wasn't punished. And I can all but guarantee that every angle was considered by Google beforehand. The fact is that any response other than a public execution of the perpetrator would have resulted in global feminist outrage against Google. It's not a witch-hunt if no one is burned alive in the town square.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 09:04 PM
1

The difference between men and women is actually caring what people say or think about you. Men don't give a fuck what some chicks maybe said about him. Only women and children get bent out of shape over that. And honestly, what's to prove that what these girls told him is even true. If these other girls "like him", chances are good that they are just trying to sabotage their friend's relationship with him.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 08:39 PM
4

I disagree. Words are powerful; you only need to look as far as the way feminism attempts to control our social discourse to prove that.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 08:26 PM
9

That's the point. Someone HAS to have final say. The captain can certainly trust his First Mate to take the wheel while he sleeps, but if there is no distinction in rank then every decision becomes a discussion and/or compromise, and that's not effective leadership. Especially if the boat is about to hit an iceberg.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 07:45 PM
15

Saying "she is co-captian" is a sign that perhaps you haven't fully ingested Red Pill. You are hedging your words to satisfy the feminist dogma of complete equality in all things. The fault in this thinking is of course that with two equal co-captians, there is no firm leadership and no decisions can be made in the event of a disagreement. There's a reason ships only have one captain. ETA: Don't mean this as criticism of you. Just pointing out ways our BP programming still stays with us long aft…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 07:30 PM
3

Difference here is that Protien World's target audience is by definition people that exercise so their consumers are more likely to fall on the opposite side of the fence as the fat-acceptance movement. Google has much more to lose by pissing off women and SJW's than Protien World had to lose by pissing off fatties.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 03:50 PM
4

I'm going to guess that you're rather young because your post reeks of immaturity. Mikey is certainly a tragic lesson when viewed through a red-pill lens, but that doesn't mean that as men we shouldn't at least respect him for giving everything he had to provide for his family under the "rules" of our society. By all accounts he was a hard-working man and a good father. He was simply mislead by society and lacked the insight of the red pill that we benefit from. Why should that be looked down up…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/17 05:18 PM
1

"Frame" isn't about what you talk about, it's about how you talk about it. The topic is largely irrelevant. For example, if she's talking about prices at her hair salon, you can control the frame of that topic by replying "It was worth every penny because you look sexy as hell, girl." Her frame for the topic was to complain about the cost and play the victim. Instead of entering her frame, you framed the topic as playful, sexy and flirty.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/17 05:34 PM
5

Sounds to me like you're playing it too cool, like so cool you don't seem interested in her or the weekend together. She's willing to drop $300 and hop a train to come fuck you after 15 years and you're acting like it's an annoyance. Dude, you gotta act like you're excited to see her. Be cool, make it sexy and flirty, but give her something to work with, man. She's not disturbed, she's self-conscious because she's putting herself out there and you're acting so disinterested.
/r/seduction04/07/17 11:31 PM
8

Good post, but I would argue that by definition an LTR is not a covert contract. A covert contract is one in which both people are not "aware" of the terms of the deal (i.e. being a friend while hoping for a sexual relationship). In an LTR, both sides have "agreed" to the terms of the contract. Of course, it's folly to expect loyalty from a woman irregardless of whether the contract is covert or not.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/17 01:49 PM
0

Rebuttal: Good plan if you want to lose every war for the next 100 years.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/17 02:36 PM
1

The genuine feedback is for you to accept that you are her friend and nothing more. And will never be anything more to her. And that's OK. Don't act hurt. Don't act angry. Don't act sad. Those feelings are outside the boundaries of your friendship with her so don't do them.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 07:20 PM
1

Just keep that in mind when you decide what to do with your friendship with the girl. If you need to cut her out completely to fully digest the Red Pill, I get that. But if you do, it's going to come off as weak and even creepy. I highly recommend playing it cool instead and just keep your friendship as if nothing has changed. From her point of view, nothing has changed. Good luck! ETA: If you're really ready to change, start with how you react to this situation. Getting butt hurt at her is the …
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 04:33 PM
1

Hold up. You need to realize that your anger towards her is misdirected. You stated that you have been close friends for years, yet "I never told her how I felt, and she has no idea". So WTF are you mad at her for? She never treated you like an option. Get that through your head. You were her FRIEND. You were never AN OPTION. If you wanted to be an option and never told her, then the truth is you lied to her for years about your friendship. Getting mad at her is a blue pill response to a failed …
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 03:57 PM
2

If you are willfully ignoring the point it's because you are scared of getting rejected. It's that simple. You said "A girl will know within 5 seconds of meeting you if she finds you interesting or not, not some special 2 week waiting period. If you blow those 5 seconds then it's game over and move on." If that's the case, you have nothing to gain by waiting, you only risk losing your chance with her. Listen, a lot of guys here claim that they are only looking for "deep connections" with women, …
/r/seduction23/05/17 12:53 PM
11

The point your obviously missing is that you need to make the moves to find out if she likes you. Of course women don't always make their interest known, men are expected to take the lead in romance. Think of it this way, what would be more painful? Getting rejected by a girl you just met, or waiting until she has another boyfriend and her friends tell you that she likes you from the beginning but you missed your chance? Girls don't have to be the aggressor because there will always be another g…
/r/seduction22/05/17 10:59 PM
8

Good God, man. You might want to just edit this article and delete your sexting examples before anyone else reads them.
/r/seduction22/05/17 02:00 PM
0

Firstly, dark triad is one subset of alphas. Secondly, AF/BB is a fallback position for women. The real objective is to lock down and marry an alpha. The BB is only in the picture if the woman cannot secure an alpha. Third, there is nothing that inherently says that an alpha does not want or will not support his own children. The point of being alpha is to live your life on your own terms. If an alpha decides to have children and/or marry, he is far more likely to be successful in either of thos…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/17 07:28 PM
0

The theory does NOT state that the BB is best equipped to raise a kid. That's ridiculous and entirely wrong.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/17 05:16 PM
1

Listen, you don't have to be an asshole to to be alpha. Being an asshole stems from weakness. In your examples, dumping a girl to avoid commitment is weak because you avoided being up front with her about your intentions. A true alpha makes it clear from the beginning he doesn't want a relationship, thus clearly setting his boundaries from the start. Leading a girl on until you find another piece of ass is pure lack of abundance and being fearful of losing her because he has nothing else. An alp…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/17 04:27 PM
8

You are misunderstanding. Most that find TRP are broken in some way and looking for answers. The point of monk mode is to give yourself time to digest the new ideas here and recalibrate. If a former BP jumps right into gaming women, chances are good that they will simply fall back into their BP ways once they have a bit of success. Old habits die hard so monk mode is a way of separating yourself from them. Monk mode isnt for everyone, but it's not what you claim it to be.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/17 01:24 PM
5

Too many people here confuse being an alpha with being a selfish asshole. You can look out for yourself AND help others. Being selfish is a sign of weakness because it shows that you truly don't have abundance in your life. Being a pushover is doing something you don't really want to do because you are too weak to say no. The other side of that is being too weak to give of yourself to say yes.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/17 01:14 PM
1

Regardless, you are creating this distinction in your mind to protect your own ego. You are attempting to convince yourself (and others) that treating someone poorly is acceptable as long as you're just being an "asshole" and not a "bad person", when the reality is you will be judged by others based solely on your actions regardless of your semantic distinctions. What I am saying is that the only control you have over how people view you is by your actions. If you hurt someone, telling them that…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/17 03:22 PM
1

Honestly, it's not a matter of how soon to text or when to ask her out. If you feel like she has shown interest in you, it's better to make a move now than to wait and miss your chance. Rules about waiting to reply or acting disinterested are rubbish. If she's interested in you, she wants you to ask her out. Women love confidence and there is nothing more confident than putting yourself out there. That said, it sounds like the problem may be in how you're communicating. Do a search here for "out…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/17 01:14 AM
7

Absolutely agree. It can also be a side effect of hypergamy, in which she is attempting to branch swing from the BB to the AF, provided she can get him to commit. My point is only that it often seems that people here tend to think that women set out to find the AF/BB, where in actuality it's either a fallback or transitionary strategy for them.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 01:59 PM
5

There is no distinction between "asshole" and "bad person", both are someone else's opinions of your actions that they find to be selfish or hurtful. If you treat someone poorly, you may not believe that your actions define you entirely, but to the person you treated poorly they certainly do. Don't hide behind a false distinction between two terms. Accept that your actions can and will have an effect on other's opinions of you, reflect upon who you want to be as a person, and make future choices…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 01:04 PM
2

This is true, no one is 100% alpha or beta. But I do think that the AF/BB model has become so universally accepted here that many people tend to think of it as women's primary mating objective, which it is not.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 12:29 PM
4

If you were clear in your intentions up front, you shouldn't need to remind them that you have other chicks in your life; they have already made that assumption. Reminding them is just disrespecting them; they know the score and if they have chosen to continue seeing you anyway then they have done so because your SMV is already high. Maybe it's an age difference thing, but after my divorce (and finding TRP) I decided that I'm done with the relationship games and drama. Seriously, I've been there…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/17 10:02 PM
1

In that case, absolutely give them shit. Nancy-boys can't fix their own machines. ;-P
/r/TheRedPill16/05/17 05:33 PM
42

The key to spinning multiple plates is, just like the metaphor, you want to keep them all spinning until you decide to move on, not to have them come crashing down on their own. So assuming that you made it clear from the start that you're not exclusive, I've found that it works best to keep details of your other women to yourself but not act as if you're hiding anything when/if evidence presents itself. Remember that with women, feelz is real. They may know logically that they're not the only g…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/17 04:10 PM
9

If these guys are your friends, then sure it's funny to rip on them to their faces. That's shit-talk and is considered sport amongst friends. If these aren't guys in your close circle, sorry to say but you're more than likely just coming off as a petty dick and or bully, and I highly doubt that their women were getting turned on by you. Treating people like that is a sign of personal insecurity and low social intelligence. It's the prototypical "tear people down to make yourself look better" and…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/17 02:11 PM
1

Evidence? Evidence is logic, and women don't operate in logic. In the meantime, you've given her exactly what she wants in you cleaning up after her. All you're doing is topping it off with drama, and women thrive on drama. It's what gets them up in the morning; they eat drama for breakfast with a side of Hamster-O's and a glass of Chad Juice. Meanwhile, you're bashing your head against the wall out of frustration over the whole thing, while trying to wash the cum stains out of the whore blouse …
/r/TheRedPill10/05/17 05:30 PM
2

You were being passive aggressive. If you want her to pick up after herself, tell her so in no uncertain terms. Create a clear boundary and she'll have less of an opportunity to manipulate.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/17 12:49 PM
1

I always ask if she has a vagina.
/r/seduction09/05/17 05:54 PM
10

Confidence is focused inward. It means that you are sure of who you are and don't need external validation. You don't need the approval of others. You are not scared of losing a silly game or being wrong because you know that it is not reflection of your character and has no bearing on your life or your true self-worth. Arrogance is focused outward. It shows that you are in fact insecure about yourself. You crave external validation from others in order to compensate for your internal struggles.…
/r/seduction08/05/17 01:21 PM
4

Didn't mean to say or imply that your approach doesn't work. Even saying "Hey let's fly to Amsterdam tomorrow" is more along the lines of what I was getting at, making the role-play as something "real" with the audacity of it being left unsaid. I think I was just thrown by your Bond example, leading into it with "So I'm James Bond and you're my Bond girl"; literally setting the stage beforehand. I'm guessing that in actuality you don't explicitly say it outright like in that example. Anyway, gre…
/r/seduction07/05/17 05:12 PM
2

It's not necessarily about trying to impress her, it's a bout creating fun atmosphere while on the date so that she has fun. And honestly, when i go out, even on a date, my primary concern is that I have fun. There's nothing worse IMO than the standard date small talk, so I make my own fun and if she joins in then awesome, we have a fun time together. If she doesn't have imagination or sense of humor to play along, then it's a good sign that she's a boring person. But I've found that women love …
/r/seduction07/05/17 05:05 PM
1

Meh, in my opinion this is just cutting off your nose to spite your face. You could just as easily argue that according to TRP, men should lead the date, so by that argument you ARE there to entertain her so she has a fun time with you. Women by their nature don't want to lead, so there's nothing wrong with giving her the tools to create a fun and exciting evening instead of just the same old same old. Your'e only a clown if it doesn't build attraction. Being entertaining doesn't equal being a c…
/r/seduction07/05/17 04:47 PM
52

This stuff works, especially the role-playing. My only comment, based on the James Bond example from your other article for instance, is to not leading into it by setting it up as role-playing. Don't say "so I'm James Bond and you're my Bond girl" like it's some sort of bad improve exercise. This will make most women self-conscious if they have to perform on the spot. The key is to let the conversation get it rolling, and you just become James Bond or whatever. Ramp up the playful false bravado,…
/r/seduction06/05/17 07:32 PM
1

I think we are talking about nuances of the word "respect". To "respect someone" is to hold them in high esteem; it is an individual emotion and how one party feels about the other. That is a one-way street, you cannot force a person to respect you. That is their opinion of you and can only be earned. To be "treated with respect" is a determination of their interactions with you. You can enforce "being treated with respect" if you hold some sort of power over the other party, be it professional,…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/17 04:26 PM
2

That shit is WAY more interesting than television. Uncommon doesn't have to be "weird" in a negative way. You just have to make it relatable; talk about why you're into those things. Bagpipes? Yeah, I'm Scottish and my grandfather used to play them. He's the one that actually started teaching me, and he gave me his original set from the '20's. I do mean rendition of "Bohemian Rhapsody" and my bagpipe "Enter The Sandman" will blow your mind! Lol
/r/seduction22/04/17 01:52 PM
26

Chiara Atik is wrong about male-female dynamics. Men will likely always be the aggressors. Problem is, she's not wrong when it comes to most men. In our current blue-pill, female-centric society, the rules of dating have been muddied to the point where there are no clear rules and rejection comes with real-life consequences that most men are terrified of. Men are being taught to believe that being forward in your interest with a woman is misogynistic. That if they approach at the wrong moment it…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/17 03:32 PM
3

"Frame" is shorthand for frame of mind. When people say you need frame, what they mean is that you need SOLID frame. You don't get shaken, emotional, drawn into her emotions. Frame is your self-confidence, drive, state of being. A women's frame is her emotional state in the moment. Don't get pulled into her frame, be unshakable.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/17 01:11 PM
1

If you're sexually inexperienced and/or a kisses virgin, chances are you're already pedestalizing hot thin women. The only way that goes away is with experience and abundance.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/17 12:34 PM
13

What they attempting to do is use the media to try to redefine what men find sexy. They believe that it is the fault of the media that "young & thin" is pushed as the defining aspects of sexiness so that is what men consider to be sexy. When in actuality it's the reverse; men define that "young & thin" is sexy and the media simply responds in kind in an attempt to sell their products.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 08:55 PM
9

Re: love. Absolutely agree. The big problem is that society, and women, teach men that their love (true love) is without condition, then men a blindsided when their woman flips the switch and moves on without remorse. That was the big eye opener for me, and TRP was the only place explaining the truth. It's why there is always an anger phase and the false perception that TRP hates women outright.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/17 01:40 PM
2

Recognizing a problem is the first step in fixing it. This poster may have done some horrible things in their life, but the fact that they clearly recognize/admit their personal issues puts them in a position to change their destructive behavior moving forward. I would also argue that posting this can also be VERY helpful because it may help someone else recognize similar behavior/tendencies in themselves.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/17 12:11 PM
3

He's not shaming. He's talking about having a mindset of 'outcome independence' to overcome approach anxiety. As you state, men are socially conditioned to think that attempting to meet women with the purpose of finding a sexual/romantic partner is "creepy". It is this conditioning THAT CAUSES your approach anxiety because you have been taught your entire life that what you are trying to do is somehow disgusting and wrong. This raises the stakes because if you're rejected (and you will be reject…
/r/seduction10/04/17 11:54 AM
1

It's pretty clear from reading the linked comic, which was co-authored by a cuck. Notice that the cuck in the comic doesn't talk about deriving his own sexual pleasure directly from being cuckolded. He talks of his jealousy, humiliation and fear, and the only direct benefit he seems to get is "take control of his fear". A weakling on the playground may think he's taking control of his fear by willingly giving up his lunch money, but he's only doing it because he's more scared of getting beat up …
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 04:02 PM
1

It seems pretty clear that the cucks don't really, truly want it. They hamster that it's about "facing their fears" and that they are "strong and brave" for doing so, but the underlying truth is that they fear that they will LOSE their woman to a stronger man, so they submit to having their woman fucked by one in an agreement that she won't leave him afterwards. The cuck doesn't actually get off on his woman getting fucked by another man; it hurts him deeply. He justifies it to himself by saying…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 01:38 PM
7

Yes but if you're a shareholder of the corporation you created then those shares are considered assets of the marriage. They would simply force you to do a valuation of the corporation and she would be entitled to half of that value. Since the corporation sold the business to the buyer, the corporation holds the cash and she is entitled to half the value of the corporation (assuming you're 100% shareholder).
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 12:02 PM
2

I think Don Corleone actually lost frame in that moment and it came off as a bully. Contrast that with how Michael handles the business, cool as a cucumber, even when confronting Fredo about his betrayal. Being quick to anger is why Sonny wasn't fit to be the Don; it's a core message of the movie.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 05:41 PM
2

Anger (especially intense anger) is a loss of frame. In regards to banter within a social group, getting angry is escalating the banter beyond "sparring" and will reflect poorly on you, whether or not you feel it justified. It reveals a crack in your armor and proves a weakness.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 05:14 PM
40

Dude, those examples are cringeworthy, and this is downright WTF: 4) Tease Her by “Implying” She’s Obsessed With Sex Tease Her by Implying She’s Obsessed With Sex You can do this in many different ways. Here are a few funny ones. If you just met her and she shakes your hand, you could pull her hand toward your crotch and say… “Whoa whoa whoa, what are you doing?” You could also bring her attention to your crotch by holding your smartphone with the lights on next to your crotch. When she looks th…
/r/seduction28/03/17 01:05 PM
11

You are confusing "respect" with "compliance". Respect is not something that can be taken. It can only be given and must be earned. You can enforce compliance through power, but that doesn't mean the person respects you. In the OP's story, he earned the respect of the girl and his peers by standing up to the drunk guy. But he didn't "take" respect from the drunk, he only enforced his compliance. Big difference.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 12:44 PM
10

You need to get better at "verbal sparring". Since society has removed physical fighting as a legal option for establishing group hierarchy and settling disputes, you need to train yourself in using words as your weapons. When you think about it, this is why guys engage in banter within their social group. It is a modern way of establishing dominance within the pack. Having a quick wit and and the better comeback is social martial arts. And you need to maintain frame while doing it. If you're ge…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 11:58 AM
31

Fat girl got her panties in a bunch because you talked to the pretty one instead of her. So she played the victim card and called security to make you look like a "creep". Have a laugh over it and don't give it another thought. Not worth your time or energy.
/r/TheRedPill26/03/17 08:29 PM
2

Considering that you're trying so hard in all of your posts here, it's pretty clear that you're trying to impress your "friend" with how cool and different you are. The funny part is that Jess already sees right through your act; women are great at sensing a man's true motives. Keep screaming from your "enlightened" soapbox all you want, but you're not getting in her pants, dude. There's a reason she friend-zoned you, and it had nothing to do with her having a boyfriend.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/17 08:46 PM
4

So you're playing the Nice Guy, giving Jess a shoulder to cry on while covertly hoping to sleep with her. Because "you're different than other guys", right? Prepare your rejection now, Jess.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/17 08:26 PM
1

Fair enough. You mentioned "me not responding to texts", so you made it sound like you were in fact receiving the messages from them.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 08:54 PM
1

Honestly, it sounds like you are hamstering here. Ghosting is in fact an avoidance tactic. Your motivation should be to make a clean break from the relationship so they aren't left wondering and sending you countless random messages. That's what their closure gives you. By ghosting, I think that not only are you actively avoiding an awkward conversation, but you are also getting additional validation from every text they continue to send you and perhaps even hedging your bets by leaving the door…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 07:48 PM
21

The biggest takeaway from this should be how she described her ex-husband: "jealous and insecure". I believe that she "genuinely loved her husband" when she married him, but the simple fact is that women only love upwards. Her husband destroyed himself, as jealousy and insecurity (one and the same, really) are signals that her SMV was higher than his and that he wasn't worthy of her. So AWALT, of course she is going to branch swing. But the true message here shouldn't be that women are shallow a…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 03:39 PM
3

Absolutely, and as with everything in life it's the context that's key. If she is cleaning your joint very early in the relationship it's a clear sign that she's desperate for a provider; she's moving too fast towards her finish line. This is clearly the case in OP's example. If however, it's a plate that you feel that has a true understanding of your value, I don't think that a 'hard next' is the only option. Granted, it all depends on having a rock-solid frame and what you're willing to put up…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 02:47 PM
2

When a woman cleans your place, she is very simply trying to qualify herself to you; to show you her 'relationship worthiness'. This isn't necessarily a bad thing. Now, you could call it a red flag if you're worried about women attempting to move from ONS/FWB/plate status to LTR, but to me all women will attempt this at some point (that is their sexual strategy after all), so really it's just proof that what you're doing is working and a blatant reminder to keep your game tight. Perhaps a better…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 01:09 PM
3

That's because continually asking questions is exhausting for the other person. A good conversation is gave-and-take. If all you're doing is asking questions, you're just taking without giving back. You need to contribute something of yourself to the dialogue; your thoughts and feelings on the topic, a funny story, something other than another follow-up question. It's not a job interview; she's there to have fun and if you're not giving it her, she'll find someone else that will.
/r/seduction18/03/17 02:29 PM
3

Is your example a conversation or a job interview?
/r/seduction18/03/17 02:24 PM
2

Listen, I get where you're going with this and don't disagree with most of it, but I do want to point out that true eating disorders are horrible psychological diseases and really not something to make light of. I won't argue the cause of eating disorders with you (social pressures, beauty standards, impressing boys... etc.), but I assure you that girls do not choose to have an eating disorder and whatever "motive" they may believe is driving them to starve themselves to death is the result of a…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 05:58 PM
74

I find the funniest part of International Women's Day is that the official website for the march/protest has a form letter for women to download asking their bosses to give them a PAID DAY OFF to join the protest. Yes, they are literally ASKING PERMISSION from the evil patriarchy to protest against them because they are unwilling to assume the risk of doing so. And they expect to be PAID to do it, to boot!
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:39 PM
1

Honestly, I didn't see most of what you're saying anywhere in the article. It seemed to me that it was a pretty fair attempt by a woman to tell other women that their actions were actually destructive to their own goals in meeting quality men, and that women themselves were the reason for the [perceived] lack of REAL men available.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 09:10 PM
3

No, we only deserve that which we work for and are able to obtain for ourselves. Nothing more. In the immortal words of Clint Eastwood, "Deserves got nuthin' to do with it."
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 04:40 PM
3

Stop the boat. The only REAL men are those willing to commit to some slut who desires a LTR? The rest are boys or males? What does this say about women that sleep around, but act like a nun when they find their 10? It's unfortunate that she uses this terminology, but she is speaking directly to a specific audience (women) and using their parlance to make her point. The entire article is about "The lack of REAL men", as women define it, so the author isn't making the judgement or distinction hers…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 04:22 PM
3

Honestly, I don't know why you guys are so critical of this article. Keeping in mind that she is writing this article for a specific audience (women), she actual hits on several key points of TRP and is incredibly critical of some feminist messaging and sexual liberation. The only major flaw I see is her failing to outright state that men find different traits desirable in potential mates; I believe she had to tip-toe around this because it's something that her audience (women) doesn't want to h…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 03:43 PM
2

I just knew one of you knuckleheads would point to that and scream "GOTCHA". Listen, this happened a few years back when I first found TRP and it was a big turning point for me. Most guys would have just been "nice" and gotten her the beer; hell, back then my instinct was to not only fetch her the beer but I probably would have paid for it myself! So no, I didn't fuck her. But what I did do is turn the tables on her manipulation and learned that by doing so, the world didn't end when I said "no"…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/17 01:38 PM
4

Reminds me of my first foray into putting TRP into action. A local bar runs a weekly cornhole (bag toss) league. I was sitting at a table watching the games and a hot blonde girl, surrounded by orbiters, was playing her match close by. Well, since she was playing, she asks me to go to the bar and get her a beer. Deciding to test some of these crazy new theories, I replied "Sure, if you buy me one too." She was flabbergasted by my reply, and said "I'm not going to buy you a beer!" So I simply sai…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/17 04:18 PM
3

Digesting TRP is similar to the 4 stages of grief: Denial - This is what society teaches us and where most men live; in denial of the fact that men and women are inherently different. Anger - The anger phase of TRP, complete with the name calling you mention. Bargaining - Perhaps where you are currently? Accepting of some teachings, but clinging to the idea that some women are special snowflakes above their core nature. Acceptance - The realization that a woman's nature doesn't make her any bett…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/17 03:44 PM
1

AWALT was never meant to be taken as an indisputable truth, rather as a simple maxim for men to remember. maxim noun a brief expression of a general truth, principle, or rule of conduct The point isn't that all women are actually like that; it's that all women have the propensity to be like that. It's a reminder for men to always protect themselves, to never completely let their guard down. The flaw in using MWALT is that, while perhaps closer to the truth, it fails as general maxim because it i…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/17 03:12 PM
2

I'm going to assume that you're young (19yo), so here's something for you to consider. Every generation has been left the world in a state of which they had no control over. Do you think the millions of young men heading to war in WW2 had a hand in creating that situation? They didn't, yet they took the JOB upon themselves to fight to fix a broken world that their future generations could live in. As broken as you believe the world is now, YOUR generation will be leaving this world to the next g…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/17 05:29 PM
6

Branding is all about creating an identity for the company/product that the consumer can personally identify with. Women are very socially conscious, so in part she molds her social identity through the brands she supports. As such, women, who are masters of cognitive dissonance, will rationalize that the branded products are better because she perceives that they increase her social standing. That's why the $1,000 Gucci purse is superior to the knockoff and worth the extra money. Her social sta…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/17 02:19 PM
5

Using prostitutes is the OPPOSITE of abundance; it's more akin to relying on porn. Sure, you know you can bust a nut whenever you want, but you'll know at the end of the day you still haven't had any real success with women.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 05:52 PM
0

This is 100% correct. Who the fuck is down voting this? TRP is being overrun by blue pill pansies.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 05:42 PM
4

Your three points may be valid, but that's NOT abundance mentality. Having abundance is knowing that if it doesn't work out with one chick, you have plenty of others on the hook. If prostitution is your only abundance, you'll know deep down that it's a business transaction and not true abundance, and that will come through in your confidence and interactions with women. Prostitution may give you confidence in your sexual abilities and teach you to interact with women without putting them on a pe…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 05:38 PM
2

Well, I didn't suggest meditation but it can be very effective in helping deal with anxieties. Not sure why you're mocking it. You can be real and honest without acting like a putz. If she's pretty, she knows it; but she's also a real person with her own insecurities and anxieties. Being able to treat her like anyone else will get you farther than admitting that you're intimidated by talking to a pretty girl.
/r/seduction24/02/17 03:18 AM
7

The point isn't that you cannot save yourself, it's that there is no social expectation for women to sacrifice themselves to save others. It's a riff on the "women and children first" lifeboat tradition. The joke is that feminists argue "equality" but will play the woman card when it benefits them. The feminist will take the seat on the lifeboat, watch the men drown and not think twice about it.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 12:07 AM
8

Yeah... don't do this.
/r/seduction23/02/17 11:05 PM
2

Because when you talk to a pretty woman you're inside your own head and are not outcome independent. With other people, you're just talking; with the woman you're trying to achieve something. That desired outcome is mentally tripping you up. Just free your mind and roll. Don't worry about if she likes you or not, she's just another person.
/r/seduction23/02/17 08:34 PM
2

Agree, but I think most times she does this instinctively as opposed to logically. I don't think she is thinking "power grab", rather she does this because her emotions tell her that her shit test will make her feel better when the opposite is actually true; the man keeping his frame will make her feel safer than if he bows to her orders. I believe that's the paradox of women.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 04:00 PM
24

Your conclusions are correct, but women are not thinking the way you describe. They are not logical, thinking "I need to beta my husband". They operate based on emotions, not logic. Changing the husband DOES make her feel good, just not in the way she thinks it does. She pushes change because her insecurities are raging; making him less "manly" quiets those fears because INSTINCTIVELY it makes her feel safe. The reality and logic is that she is making him less attractive to competition, but she …
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 12:42 PM
1

That's only a bad thing if you're "poor". The entire point of TRP is to make your life "rich", to become one of the top 20% instead of begging for scraps.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/17 03:06 PM
5

Good line if delivered with bravado, but with the wrong delivery it could be taken as weakness/Nice Guy. The key would be the implication that you don't want to fuck her because your SMV is clearly so much higher than her's, and then you'd better steer the conversation to her proving she's worthy. In the wrong hands, it could be a dead end which ends up denying that you're a sexual male; a big mistake that's hard to recover from if you're inexperienced.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/17 07:03 PM
4

Dude, it's simple marketing for a declining publication.Gone are the days of anyone caring which model got this year's cover, so in a play for media coverage they pander to the feminists, get a bunch of free headlines and positive talk on feminist twitter/blogs, and hopefully become relevant again. At the end of the day it'll have no more impact than Target having a fat model in their weekly circular.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/17 10:24 PM
1

Talk about failing a shit test, you immediately come off as insecure and butt hurt here. Simply agree and amplify; play the role of the hot guy that supermodels use for just sex. You're the faux victim of being used by hundreds of beautiful women for their pleasure when you just want to be seen as real person. Have fun with it instead of getting angry.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/17 09:02 PM
1

You miss the forrest for the trees, here. His wife wasn't attracted to his former blue-pill self, so she wasn't going to choke on his beta cock for a half-hour. It wasn't until he changed himself outside of the bedroom that he could become the alpha mouth-fucker inside the bedroom.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 08:15 PM
1

The problem is that you shouldn't set the standards for your own self-respect around the nature and actions of women. Doing so is literally letting women define who you are. The crux of AWALT is that women are women and you should set your expectations accordingly. Bella the blue-ribbon pig may be an exemplary pig, but you wouldn't expect her to NOT roll around in filth if given the chance. All pigs are like that. And just because Bella was the best pig at the county fair doesn't mean that you s…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 06:32 PM
1

You are both missing my point and making my point at the same time.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 04:36 PM
2

TRP is about seeing through the lies that society teaches us and understanding the truth of gender dynamics. And part of that truth is that women are ultimately betrayed by society's narrative as well. The AF/BB dichotomy only exists BECAUSE society and feminism has destroyed the very thing that women truly desire. They just don't see the truth any more than Beta Bob does, because society's big lie is so convincing.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 04:30 PM
2

Learn from the past but focus on the future. Lamenting "what if's" is only spinning your wheels.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 04:05 PM
8

The other part of waking up is realizing that women are NOT men and shouldn't be judged as such. Judge yourself based on being the best man you can be, and judge women based on them being the best woman they can be.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 03:57 PM
6

Allowed to exist? When you finally internalize that YOU are the only one controlling and "allowing" your actions is the moment you will truly be unplugged. You are on the path, keep working and thinking. Good luck!
/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 03:51 PM
1

"With great power comes great responsibility." - Albert Einstein
/r/TheRedPill17/02/17 03:43 PM
2

Guys, I'm going to come right out and say it: the problem isn't with them, the problem is YOU. You can literally talk to women on a first date about any topic imaginable, but you have to bring more to the table than just your intellect. You need to also have wit, charm, imagination, creativity, and empathy. You need to engage their emotions and imaginations, make the topic relevant to themselves and their experiences, and most importantly wrap it all up in a fun, playful and engaging time out wi…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/17 06:07 PM
3

That's because women don't tend to care about how it works (logic) as much as they care about how it makes them feel (emotion). The problem is on your end; you're not steering the conversation towards her interests.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/17 05:27 PM
22

Absolutely this. It's really as simple as realizing that people in social situations want to feel good in the moment and have fun. Dating especially, is not a job interview and shouldn't be treated as such. That's one of the biggest complaints women have about dating; it's more often than not a grueling interview which is work, not fun. I don't know if most guys are socially stunted or just taking dating way too seriously, but the "have fun" part seems lost on most. The truth is, you can talk ab…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/17 03:59 PM
1

Sexual strategy is amoral but that doesn't mean that your choices and actions don't have consequences. That's like someone crying "free speech" after getting punched in the nose for saying something stupid. Sleeping with a married woman is a dumb decision, regardless of your morality, because you are opening your life up to needless potential problems for sex, which should already be abundant in your life. In the end, fucking a married woman is a bad bet; sex is easy and abundantly available els…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/17 10:51 PM
6

Fear is the providence of women; understanding this is key in understanding women. Women live in a constant state of fear. They are physically weaker than men, so every man must be viewed first as a potential threat. They lack the ability to defend themselves, so they must legislate biased protection through the government. They fear being cast out from the group, so social standing is paramount; hence the push against any form of shaming them for their behavior (slut shaming, fat shaming) and t…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/17 07:14 PM
3

It's not a paradox when you look at the bigger picture. Social standing is everything to women. She will share everything that increases her social standing and hide everything that would hurt her social standing. If your SMV is high enough, the fact that she was able to fuck you outweighs the hit of acting slutty. If your SMV is similar to hers, the +1 to her N count may be a sufficient deterrent to sharing. And if your SMV is lower than hers, she will hide/deny that it ever happened because fu…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/17 05:29 PM
5

Absolutely. Not only possible, but highly likely true. Women are social creatures, but also highly competitive. A woman will tell her friends everything that they perceive will help them socially, and nothing that would hurt them. They will brag about you to increase their social standing by extension, they will trash you to gain valuable victim status. I believe when it comes to sex talk, they will only brag to their friends if your perceived SMV within their group is near or below their level;…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/17 05:18 PM
5

This is a great breakdown. There is nothing inherently beta about 'taking her tray' and if you are worried about keeping score of such minutia then I would argue that you haven't truly internalized TRP and being alpha. As a man, you can do nice and polite things for a woman and not risk being beta so long as you do them from within YOUR FRAME. Think of it this way: Chivalry stems from a strong, alpha frame. Holding doors, pushing in chairs, carrying a woman's baggage, all initially come from a t…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/17 02:55 PM
10

Disagree. All women use sex as their currency to barter for a relationship. Even (especially) when they bang Chads. The entire theory of hypergamy is that women are always trying to swing branches to a more beneficial relationship; in the AF/BB model the woman has secured the relationship support of a lower SMV male (BB), but fucks the Chad (AF) with the express purpose of attempting to secure the relationship from him, the higher SMV male, and improve her position. The fact that his SMV is high…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/17 05:05 PM
2

I'm only suggesting that there's a bigger picture here you may not be seeing. If your life's goal is simply to get your dick sucked, I wish you all the best in achieving that.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 08:29 PM
1

The destination is a man's own success and happiness. Women and sex are simply roadside attractions along the way.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 06:23 PM
2

TRP is for improving yourself. PUA is for getting your dick sucked. Perhaps you're the one doing it wrong.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 06:18 PM
2

However, when I see things on that reddit like 'Don't pay attention to what he says, watch what he does' I see a sad attempt at copying this sub reddit to engender credibility. One of the fundamental differences between men and women is that we verbalize exactly what we want. We want fit, beautiful, feminine women....we've voiced this for eons. And we also SHOW that's what we want by going after fit, beautiful, feminine women. Women on the other hand say they want a kind, sensitive, selfless man…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 05:29 PM
2

I'm not sure where you got the notion that anyone is saying that ALL those that possess clarity are geniuses. The point of the article is that what separates the great talent from the genius is clarity of mind; having great talent is the entry point to the discussion. Clarity WITHOUT great talent is not genius and not even in the discussion.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 05:01 PM
1

I interpret it as the genius must first admit to himself that he doesn't have all the answers or else he will stop asking new questions and cease making new discoveries. I would argue that genius doesn't stem from a "state of knowing" bur rather from a "state of questioning". If the genius knows the world is flat, there is no reason him to question it.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 04:49 PM
18

All women earnestly want to submit to a high value man; it is the natural order of things. As such, it is not degrading or humiliating. It is empowering to them, for if a high value man chooses her it is a signal of her own worth. For women, sex is only degrading if she allows a man of lower value to take her. Duty sex, transactional sex and vanilla/starfish sex are all indicators that she doesn't perceive the man as high or equal value to herself. That is when sex is degrading and humiliating f…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 04:29 PM
1

Which will only help them. They are now a shining beacon of equality for taking a stand against patriarchy & misogyny, which Twitter has just "proven" beyond a shadow of doubt actually exists. Mission accomplished.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 04:14 PM
2

Consumers tend to be very brand loyal once they believe that a particular brand aligns with their sense of self. So by preaching about equal pay for women, they are creating a positive emotional connection with women. And women make 85% of all consumer purchases while driving 70% of all purchasing decisions. So yes, it was very much about selling cars.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 03:42 PM
3

I agree 100% and will point out that men (and especially young men) live in a complete state of cultural confusion. It's not that they are pussies so much as there are no longer clear rules of acceptable behavior. We live in a time where sexual consent can be revoked after the fact if the woman later feels badly about her actions, "unwanted sexual attention" (i.e. being propositioned) is considered sexual assault, and even hypothetical lewd statements ("I COULD just grab her pussy) is somehow an…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 02:40 PM
1

I agree with much of what you said here and thank you for your well-thought reply. My only contention, made in the spirit of continuing dialogue and not to be argumentative, would be that this doesn't sound like such an "extreme case" that would necessitate jumping to such extreme conclusions. Young women are being taught to take pride and ownership of their sexuality, a message which the media and feminist blogosphere have contorted into a "slut pride" movement. As such this girl's behavior has…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 01:53 PM
1

You're missing the point, Mr. Angry. Everyone here will agree with you that this girl is broken. The problem is you have no idea if she was sexually abused and by stating it as fact you are in essence giving her the "victim badge" to remove her own personal accountability. Chances are she just has extremely low self esteem and lacks to foresight to understand the consequences of whoring around so openly.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/17 06:55 PM
2

So then why should anyone help you?
/r/seduction02/02/17 01:06 AM
4

I think you're overreaching a bit. The way he handled it was perfect for the situation. He didn't lose frame, shut down the argument and made it clear that she was being childish and he wouldn't be a part of it. Will she act out again? Maybe, but that's not proof of anything other than she's a woman and AWALT. But if he is consistent moving forward, she will learn that she won't get the reaction and drama she craves from it.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/17 02:15 PM
10

This is a great reply, but part of it is also that making the tough decision puts the crosshairs directly on them if they are wrong. Group think not only protects their social standing but also provides plausible deniability and way to dodge consequences down the road. It's not her fault if she can say that everyone agreed that she was making the right decision.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 07:34 PM
36

Don't overthink the "she must feel inferior" thing. All it is really saying is that she must believe that your SMV is higher than hers. You don't have to pull some emotionally abusive dark triad shit for that. Just follow TRP and keep improving yourself in the process.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 07:26 PM
2

Women have become wise to the old PUA bullshit so playing the same tired script that worked a decade ago is of course going to be less effective now. The difference between PUA and TRP is that TRP is about understanding and leveraging the base mechanics of attraction operating behind the scenes, not just following a simple "how to" guide to fake it.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/17 03:43 PM
2

Thanks for taking the time to think about it and reply. I certainly wouldn't presume to "correct you"; as a man, I have my theories but that's all they are, theories. :) I do agree with your thoughts. TRP often points to evolutionary biology when it comes to attraction, but it's often misconstrued and vilified by women that feel that the concept somehow removes their personal agency from the equation. Yet at the same time, they will point to dependency as an attraction killer and list "successfu…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/17 10:04 PM
2

Absolutely, all because she is driven by her feelings at moment. When your SMV is higher than hers, she feels insecure. So she works to lower your SMV so she feels safer without realizing it will kill her attraction. When it does, it is YOUR fault for not being a man and standing up to her. So actually, she isn't wrong. And we come full circle into a lesson about being too nice and how it kills attraction.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/17 08:54 PM
1

"Also I prefer when the guy isn't quite as invested in me as I am him." Have you ever given thought as to WHY you tend to prefer this? From a logical standpoint, isn't the safer position the one with less invested, therefore having less to lose? Just curious.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/17 08:39 PM
3

"her psychological desire for comfort will drive her to try to get you to destroy the part of you that she finds attractive." Brilliant insight here.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/17 08:26 PM
5

Don't "keep score". That's what women do. You're a man, and as such you have more important things to worry about than a petty score card. In the end, if you are letting some imaginary score dictate your actions, you aren't being true to your convictions in the moment and is inherently a BP/Nice Guy tactic. Have you ever heard women give a man dating advice and say "Just be yourself."? We all know that this is horrible advice because most men interpret this to mean they should expose their emoti…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/17 07:37 PM
12

All girls want to be treated well. They will all tell you as much, and they all absolutely believe this to be true. But there is an inherent paradox with this, and to truly understand it, you have to be able to look at life from their point of view. Girls (especially attractive girls) all grow up with everybody going out of their way to be nice to them, to treat them well. So this is their base line; it is the norm for them. And then when they hit their teen years, sex comes into play, and they …
/r/TheRedPill16/01/17 06:38 PM
3

His objective wasn't to protect his space and get the women to leave. If it was, your example would probably work and chase them away, albeit with much less style.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/17 07:54 PM
3

The only difference between "offensive" and "cocky" (confident) is how you handle their reaction. The women in the example tried to act offended, but instead he came off as alpha and desirable because he (presumably) held frame and didn't buy into their shit test over it.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/17 06:24 PM
31

The jacket doesn't matter; in film parlance it's a "MacGuffin", simply a prop to propel the characters forward. It worked because it immediately positioned the guy as higher status than the girls, and they had to then prove their worth to him instead of the other way around. ETA: In response to your "Lord/Cupbearer" question, the key is to not talk to down to the other guys. Asking his friend to keep them away from his jacket isn't an order to a subordinate if you treat the other guy as an equal…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/17 06:16 PM
3

If you're worried about offending, you're doing it wrong. It's the complete IDGAF attitude that makes it work.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/17 06:10 PM
10

Who cares if he got dumped and is posting here to deal with it? Maybe he needs to reset and is using his posts to help himself think through shit. Doesn't make what he says any less true. Attacking the OP instead of the content of his posts is a chick move, dude. You have beef with him personally, take it to PM or move on with your life.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/17 04:08 AM
11

Should have gone all Jonathan Swift and actually written the paper from the point of view that it is more ethical to do so.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/16 02:20 PM
2

Yes, you're right. In hindsight, I clearly didn't fully understand the nature of women and made the mistake of believing that they valued loyalty and integrity as men do. But that's certainly something that TRP has taught me and it's a mistake that I certainly won't be making again. Thanks again for your insight. You've given me a lot to ponder as I reflect on my situation and the events that led me here.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/16 03:55 PM
2

I agree and have acknowledged my own culpability. But as is the nature of all "truisms", they may provide a smart framework but are only true until they aren't. All civilization is built around a certain level of trust that each individual will act in the best interest of the group as long as those interests are aligned. In the case of my business, my trust was not placed in the "outsider" that took the business, but in the longtime female partner and friend that ultimately betrayed BOTH of our …
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 03:11 PM
4

Not sure if this is serious or not but yes, I understand that my actions certainly played role in my life to that point. I guess what I meant was that I was an honest man, I worked hard for the company and my family, and didn't lie, cheat and screw people over to get ahead. There was no bad business deal that tanked my company, nor infidelity that tanked my marriage. As a business we were moderately successful for 15 years and should have continued to be so. But yes, I was too trusting and ultim…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 07:58 PM
3

Honestly, if it weren't for my son I'm not sure that I would be alive today. I appreciate the kind words, but I surely don't feel like a titan. And no, this isn't bullshit at all. It's amazing how quickly life can spiral out of your control when you least expect it. As for the plates... logically you're absolutely right. While I don't spend much maintaining them, it is probably time and energy that could be spent elsewhere. But if I'm being honest, I'll admit that emotionally it is something tha…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 07:47 PM
4

You're right, in hindsight my lawyer was a complete pussy. I thought I had hired the bulldog, but then my case got passed off to one of his associates. Of course, at the time with my business issues happening concurrently I didn't see how badly I was getting screwed until it was all over. My ex slow played the hand perfectly; I didn't even realize how she was escalating things until she flipped her cards after the river and showed a full boat. As for the business case, I have shopped it to sever…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 07:11 PM
2

Thanks, buddy. I appreciate the kind words. But as large as my problems my seem to some, I'm sure they pale in comparison to others. If TRP has taught me anything, it's that all we can do as men is play the cards we are dealt, do everything we can to improve and keep on trucking. Take care.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 06:43 PM
9

And just in case anyone reading this has any doubts about the female-bias of our court system, consider this. The year that my divorce finalized, my ex made $93,000 and I made exactly $0.00 (didn't even qualify for unemployment benefits because I was a business owner for so long) and she gets to retire with a full pension in 5 years because we pre-purchased retirement years for her while married. Well, not only did I not receive one cent of spousal support to help me through rough times, the wif…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 05:52 PM
10

Classic narcissist and while I'm no psychologist I'd say sociopath as well. The red flags were certainly there, I recognized them and I thought that I had myself protected. The problem was I had another long time business partner (we started the business together originally) and we eventually merged our business with this guy. Well, I considered my first partner one of my very best friends, we recognized and often discussed issues with and worries about this new partner, and we were protected as…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 04:21 PM
11

Day by day, friend. On a personal level, I'm in a much better spot now. My relationship with my son has never been stronger despite not seeing him as often, and just having him in my life pulled me through some very dark times. I have several beautiful plates and my sex life is better than ever. Professionally, I'm still struggling. I still haven't found consistent work, in part due to the reasons above and honestly because losing my business really destroyed my confidence, self-worth and drive.…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 04:06 PM
53

Being destroyed is certainly in the eye of the beholder and the fact that others have experienced worse doesn't minimize the impact of your experience on your life. But at the same time, hearing the horror stories of others may hopefully help you to realize that as bad as you feel, you are still in a position to recover and come through it all the better. I'm 45. I was married for nearly twenty years and have a wonderful special needs son. I owned my own business for the last 15 years. When my e…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 02:19 PM
11

You missed your chance. You failed to get her past her LMR after she invited you over for sex, then you dropped the ball with the "A hot tub doesn't have to be intimate..." text. Your game was weak, learn from it and move on to the next chick.
/r/seduction28/11/16 05:01 PM
7

I always reply with "Don't make promises you can't keep, lady" with a wink and a wry smile. It's playful, shows confidence and doesn't kill the sexual tension. Granted, it's all in the delivery. You have to say it with a hint of false bravado and roguish charm. Think Han Solo's classic "I love you... I know" retort.
/r/seduction27/10/16 04:55 PM
14

"Aftercare". You need to follow up all the rough stuff with soft cuddly lovey time so she knows that it was all role play and doesn't feel used and abused afterwards. Perception is reality for women; even if she loved it (and consented) in the moment, her emotions afterwards will determine her truth moving forward.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/16 05:08 PM
102

Yeah, that card game idea is really cringeworthy.
/r/seduction20/09/16 04:02 PM
0

Only $7 million? Sounds to me like Johnny Depp divorce raped HER.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 08:33 PM
1

If you have to resort to doing ANY of these, there's a reason you're not getting laid in the first place.
/r/seduction04/08/16 05:41 PM
1

You're probably jerking yourself right now thinking about that, you little beta bitch. Grow up.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/16 03:30 PM
0

You're absolutely correct. Have an up vote.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/16 12:12 AM
10

Dude, she has a boyfriend. You intentionally just turned a platonic friendship into an awkward "choose him or me". And surprise, she chose him and now doesn't want to deal with the weird emotional fallout from something they didn't sign up for in the first place. Stop trying to use friendships with girls as a foot in the door for romance. You're acting like a sleazy salesman, selling your relationship with them as "just friends" and then trying to pull a bait-and-switch. I get that it's hard to …
/r/seduction15/07/16 05:22 PM
1

If you're only here to land pussy, then from a pick-up point of view you're right. But if your life is about more than just the next broad you want to fuck, you should realize that the opinion of one dumb bimbo in class is completely meaningless in the grand scheme. Live your life as a high value man and you'll have enough options to not give a single fuck what anyone, especially women, think at any given moment. Trust me, the respect of your male peers and mentors will take you much farther in …
/r/TheRedPill05/07/16 12:08 AM
1

You perfectly illustrate his point. You are putting the bimbo on a pedastle because she has a pussy, giving her vapid opinion a value well beyond it's worth. Who cares what some dumb bimbo thinks? I'd rather have the respect of my fellow man.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/16 12:23 PM
59

I'm impressed. You banged a chubby 5 and a 6. You are literally Chad Thundercock.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/16 02:00 PM
1

Man Code only applies between friends. Honor a code with a stranger and you'll be played for a chump EVERY time. Welcome to reality.
/r/seduction19/06/16 02:46 PM
-6

All the guys in here calling you a douche just know deep down that they are just like the guy on the date. They know that they aren't a prize for women so they beg other guys to honor some ridiculous "man code" instead of bettering themselves and competing on a level playing field. The lesson they should learn here is that women will always go for the better option. Women don't respect the "man code" and never will, so begging other men to do so is pointless. If the girl is willing to swing bran…
/r/seduction19/06/16 12:47 PM
1

Whether premeditated or instinctual, it doesn't matter. She is manipulating the situation for her benefit, not the well-being of the man.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 03:05 PM
4

There's nothing honest or fair about it. All she is doing is giving herself justification to start having sex with other men, and/or, to initiate divorce rape, all without having to feel guilty about doing so. Regardless of her "permission", she will immediately be the victim if he does so and then she can hamster away doing exactly what she really wants to do, which is to divorce him and sleep with other men.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/16 04:46 PM
1

TRP doesn't teach that men are better than women, just that we are not the same. X and Y may not be equal, but that doesn't mean Y is greater than X (or vise versa). Men and women DO have different sexual strategies and you do yourself a disservice by choosing to ignore this.
/r/seduction09/06/16 06:34 PM
1

Women give this advice because it's truly how they want/dream/believe that the world should work. It's an extension of the Disney Fairy Tale romance that they have been raised to believe is their birthright as women, that every girl has a prince out there that will show up one day and sweep them off their feet. All women are ultimately insecure; even the hottest girls worry that men only like them for their looks/sex. They need to believe that they are loved for who they are inside. So by giving…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 08:43 PM
0

Using "he looks like he has Downs" as a put-down is disparaging to ALL people that have Down Syndrome regardless of whether anyone that actually has Downs heard you. You are still perpetuating the stigma that people with Downs are ugly, dumb and worthless and in doing so you are directly contributing to the continued cultural acceptance of the mistreatment and abuse of those with cognitive disabilities. If TRP is truly about improving yourself, here's a perfect opportunity for you to learn a REA…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 09:15 PM
0

Cool story, bro. But you know who really don't DESERVE to be put down? People with Down Syndrome. They are the ones that are continually mistreated, bullied, abused and shat upon by cowardly dick bags like yourself. You didn't prove yourself to be Alpha here, you proved yourself to be a pathetic human being.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 08:19 PM
16

I tried this but instead of the smirk I ended up making my "O" face. The eye contact was intense though.
/r/seduction04/04/14 11:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter