TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Taranos Archive

View 1 post and 13 comments by Taranos on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Ask Red PillTaranos/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 02:54 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

overly emotional reaction
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 08:11 PM
1

That's what I am saying, there is no such data. I looked at the dat files and the column names for each column and there is no data file that has the 3 columns I mentioned that would be needed to make the plot we are talking about. Once again, in my original post I was talking about cheating and girls dropping relationships over little things. This is not the same as divorce, which is the ending of a big relationship often over big things and involving decisions from two different people. We are…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 07:34 PM
1

throw away a good relationship over a small problem This is what I wrote actually. If every divorce was the result of a woman throwing away the relationship over a small problem then you would be correct. But you are not. I'm sure if you asked people who have gotten divorces, the vast majority wouldn't say that the divorce was due to a small problem in their relationship. We are talking about cheating here, infidelity.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 06:12 PM
1

I helped myself and found no data that links a persons divorce to # of past sexual partners for men OR women. For example, we would need to see data like this:...... Respondant ID # of past sexual partners current marital status 001 1 married 002 2 married 003 10 divorced But there is no such data table in this study. This is all not to mention, of course, that even if the divorce data exists, it does not illustrate higher likelihood of cheating - only a correlation with divorce.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 05:57 PM
1

But thus far my own life experience has shown that this isn't the case. I have seen more cheating from girls with lay counts of 1 or 2 then those 40+. I don't base my life beliefs on a simple gut feeling that I can't find any logical backing for...that's what irrational women do. I am a scientist so I like to see that the beliefs that steer major decisions in my life are backed by some form of evidence and not simply a "feeling"
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 04:58 PM
0

Neither. I have seen the chart on divorce rates before, but I have still yet to see studies on cheating. Divorce does not equal a woman cheating on a man.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 04:55 PM
-1

This on top of the fact it is proven the higher partner count means the higher chance of cheating This is what I really want to get at, where is this proven? Plus you want to be her number #1 and when you are competing with 100 others that makes it a lot more difficult, not impossible just difficult. Are you saying that low count girls are better because they are supposedly easier to seduce than high count girls?
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 05:11 AM
-4

Right, so by the dog analogy, you are saying that a girl who fucked a lot of guys in the past is more likely to cheat on you today. What I'm asking for is evidence of this statement. So, is there evidence that a girl who doesn't want to randomly fuck anymore, but instead be in a serious relationship, will be more likely to cheat (not have a divorce which is often a 2-sided event) given that she fucked a lot of guys years ago? Or is this something that we all just assume to be true without proof?
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 05:02 AM
-5

I agree, this is likely especially the case with religious couples. I responded to Piroko who posted the same article. This study also doesn't have the male trend in it which is odd.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 04:51 AM
-3

I actually have seen that chart before. I'm more interested in increased rates of cheating while in a committed relationship or marriage. The increased divorce rate is interesting, however there are two things wrong with this study for my purposes of passing judgement on high female lay counts: It does not discount religious people (who exist in great numbers in America where the study was done) who are more likely to have low lay counts and also more likely to see divorce as a big taboo and do …
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 04:47 AM
-1

Woman of high quality who knows they are of high quality tend to have low partner counts, versus the 6/7s with self esteem issues. This implies that 6/7s have one night stands and short term relationships because of self esteem issues. We all know girls for whom this is true, but I've also met plenty who do it just because they like the guy and are horny and enjoy acting on that.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 04:20 AM
-4

Would you take the dog home that had a history of biting people or the one that's never bitten anyone? This is a bad analogy though, comparing a dog biting its owner to a girl breaking up with a guy. There are many reasons why people might break up, it is not always simply due to a girl being a bitch. If you are equating a dog biting an owner with a girl being a crazy bitch and dumping her boyfriend then you have a point. I don't think anyone would argue that dating a girl who randomly freaks ou…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 04:15 AM
4

New here, I don't get it...what does taking a vacation outside the country or having parents buy your first car have to do with being white or male?
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 06:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter