Tarot_frank Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Men’s social skills are far better than women on average. The only reason it seems women have better social skills is because society is set up to cater to women. No, implied generalizations are very common in conversational English. "The drivers suck here" or "dating apps are toxic" or "men just want sex” or “women only go for money” or “nobody cares anymore” are all simply shorthand for "I notice this pattern a lot". It doesn't literally mean "every single person does this/this is universally true". This is plain English. If you can't follow this I don't know what else to tell you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 04:40 PM
1	Men’s social skills are far better than women on average. The only reason it seems women have better social skills is because society is set up to cater to women. If you struggle to understand the concept of implied generalizations that’s on you, not me.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 04:08 PM
1	Men’s social skills are far better than women on average. The only reason it seems women have better social skills is because society is set up to cater to women. No, implied generalizations are very common in conversational English. "The drivers suck here" or "dating apps are toxic" or "men just want sex” or “women only go for money” or “nobody cares anymore” are all simply shorthand for "I notice this pattern a lot". It doesn't literally mean "every single person does this/this is universally true". There's very little need to be so pedantic about this unless you really desperately need to convince yourself that you won this interaction for whatever rea…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 02:54 AM
1	Opened IG,first thing i saw Those Greek statues were made by men though. Whoops.	/r/EverydayMisandry	03/04/25 06:10 AM
1	Reddit says NO to male self-defense against female physical assault. Well, to be honest, context matters greatly. You can only use proportionate force and it has to be done in order to end the threat. If a person hits you and walks away, hitting them back minutes later isn't self-defense. They have to be actively attacking you, in which case some degree of force to protect yourself is considered justifiable from a legal perspective. But yes, it was a play fight which makes this entire post ridiculous. I agree misandry exists, but I don't believe that most of the …	/r/EverydayMisandry	03/04/25 06:00 AM
1	Reddit says NO to male self-defense against female physical assault. This subreddit will turn a blind eye to anything even remotely suggesting male culpability for the sake of getting their fix of misogynistic rage, to the point where they'll even justify domestic violence with "wElL sHe HiT hIm FiRsT". If the reverse took place they'd just as quickly switch sides and blame her for retaliating. This entire subreddit is pathetic, frankly.	/r/EverydayMisandry	03/04/25 05:43 AM
1	First men are creeps, then lonely! What's going on? You’ve written an entire essay trying to twist what I said into a contradiction by pretending that nuance is inconsistency. It’s not. You keep misinterpreting my points, repeating yourself, and accusing me of emotional motives while clearly reacting from your own and pretending like you're not here to assuage your need to assign blame to someone. I've explained the greater context of my original comment several times and you refuse to integrate it into your understanding of anything because doin…	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/04/25 06:04 PM
1	First men are creeps, then lonely! What's going on? If the assumption you yourself made is that it’s best to treat every man as if they were dangerous because you can’t tell, then making yourself not a danger is by definition not an overreaction. You even made your own rebuttal to the potential counterargument to this point in that a man you know could be dangerous after a period of convincing you he’s not, meaning even making it clear as much as possible that you aren’t dangerous is a non-solution too. I stated that this is why women often creat…	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/04/25 03:39 PM
1	First men are creeps, then lonely! What's going on? Your analogy about fighting made no sense the first time, so I'm not sure why you felt the need to double down on it, but no, social interaction is a core pillar of human civilization and is indisputably necessary in order to facilitate cooperation and maintain the fabric that ties society together. Fighting is entirely optional, destructive and in no real sense necessary or constructive, so no one would reasonably state that "not fighting is an overreaction". Please don't insult other people's …	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/04/25 07:22 AM
1	First men are creeps, then lonely! What's going on? I honestly didn't think I needed to spell out the context of the situation. I assumed you understood the basic gender dynamics you spend all day complaining about. My mistake! If someone is uncomfortable around you In which part of the original post is it stated that the woman in question is uncomfortable? It's not, it's assumed, so given that she states she "feels lonely" her coworker's distancing could be pretty reasonably classified as an overcorrection. Not an unreasonable thing to say at al…	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/04/25 07:08 AM
0	First men are creeps, then lonely! What's going on? The original post described men keeping their distance to avoid making women uncomfortable, and a woman expressing that this distance feels isolating. My comment responded directly to that dynamic. Women creating space from men is often a response to real harm. Men creating distance from women is an overcorrection to that. These patterns feed into each other. I'm not sure how to state this more simply for you. You’re focused on whether I perfectly addressed every clause of a single sentence, but…	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/04/25 06:34 AM
0	First men are creeps, then lonely! What's going on? If a man is too close to her, he's a creep. Not sure how it’s a non sequitur when the comment right before mine contained “If a man is too close to her, he’s a creep.” That’s exactly what I was addressing. Women keep their distance for safety, men keep their distance to avoid being seen as a threat and both end up isolated. The whole thing feeds off a lack of trust which comes from a long history of male violence and emotional repression. Neither occurs in a vacuum. Women are on guard around men…	/r/EverydayMisandry	01/04/25 06:40 PM
1	First men are creeps, then lonely! What's going on? The original comment was a general explanation of why women often keep their distance from men. That context applies whether someone is ranting about rejection or just confused by social dynamics. It’s not about you personally. No one’s diagnosing you. You reacted like it was a personal attack, but maybe ask yourself why it struck a nerve.	/r/EverydayMisandry	01/04/25 06:13 PM
-7	First men are creeps, then lonely! What's going on? Generally speaking women keep some degree of formal distance from most men because A) they have no way of knowing which ones are decent or which ones are violent/abusive and the only way to find out is through risking being wrong and B) because many men mistakenly interpret basic friendliness or cordiality as a sign of interest and get upset when their fragile egos are shattered upon learning that it wasn't intended as such. This creates, at best, highly uncomfortable situations for women or at …	/r/EverydayMisandry	31/03/25 12:10 AM