TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TasteAccomplished Archive

View 0 posts and 90 comments by TasteAccomplished on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Meanwhile the average femdom I've seen online (including the ones who act this stuff out professionally irl) talks about their submissives as genuinely less than human (even outside a kink setting) and believes it's functionally impossible to abuse them because of unspecified "power dynamics" And yeah, it is important to bring up the possibility of abuse in BDSM, but the conversation is literally always framed around "men entering kink spaces" even by the people trying to defend the practice, wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 04:42 PM
13

Between statements like this, the general treatment of men, and recent posts about how all Americans are guilty for Trump, it does seem like a lot of people who broadly consider themselves left-wing or liberal are frighteningly enthusiastic about collective punishment
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/26 05:29 PM
24

That's true, I suppose, but it's the ability to openly engage in something for which you would otherwise be treated with suspicion for simply asking about, and even the simulated feeling of trust is more than most men can get anywhere else
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/25 12:19 PM
64

I'm not even opposed to teaching kids about not mistaking scripted porn for real sex acts, but telling a generation of young men that indulging in basically the only medium that still treats them as desirable for themselves (which, whatever criticisms you may have of it, it functionally is) makes them a horrible misogynist sounds like the worst possible way of doing this
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/25 12:10 PM
1

Good thing this society isn't patriarchal then
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 08:55 PM
1

No, they whine at the mostly-male government and law enforcement to do it for them in the name of faux-pity Unmarried men and women have existed in actual patriarchal cultures throughout history, finding the opposite sex attractive isn't a conspiracy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 06:58 PM

Well yeah, most people of either gender aren't going to stay with someone they simply no longer find unattractive, emotionally or physically
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 06:54 PM
1

Yes, hence why there aren't many of them on the right, nor would I expect them to be If the only defence of "kill all men" rhetoric is that it doesn't mean anything in terms of actual belief, it shouldn't be too difficult to ditch it
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 01:13 PM
2

I don't really think it's that deep - to be a man anywhere on the political left these days basically entails accepting denigration of your identity, being expected to take the blame for the actions of anyone who shares it, not to mention the litany of double standards when it comes to even pursuing a partner, so it's not much of a mystery why more of them are genuinely just apolitical (the number of actively right-wing men hasn't much increased overall)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 11:53 AM
1

If this were the case, feminists wouldn't be clamouring to restrict porn or sex work, for possibly raising men's standards in partners to basically the same level women's have always been at
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 12:50 AM
1

Well of course, the only complaint we have about that is that men expecting their partner to ever proactively show interest in them or pursue them is treated as "patriarchal entitlement" while women expecting it is supported by both the traditional model of relationships and most modern feminists
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 01:58 PM
2

The concept of "centering"/"decentering" in the context of modern politics is baffling - like describing oneself as a feminist, ie a member of a movement for advancing the rights of women (pretty much always defined as anyone not conforming to the role of a man) implicitly makes men the central defining feature of that ideology What people usually mean when they talk about it is trying to find a balance where they can go out of their way as little for someone not from their ingroup as possible, …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 10:36 PM
2

How does agreeing to have sex for money make someone uniquely an object, any more than paying them for some other tasks?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:26 PM
2

Men obsessing over trying to find a virgin wife are functionally the same as women obsessing over whether their partner watches porn - basically just unresolved fear that a memory or fantasy can outdo them
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:24 PM
3

I mean that creating a whole movement to swear off dating men still absolutely makes men the centre of their project Then again, "centering" as a concept in modern politics is mostly just used as an excuse to try to avoid giving a shit about the perspective of someone not superficially like oneself
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 01:45 PM
2

"Decentering" is completely meaningless if you're completely changing your life to oppose the group you're supposedly trying to decenter
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 10:38 AM
1

Fine, as long as women are also taught by their mothers to make themselves appealing by offering something of value to a partner (something that is generally decried nowadays as unfair standards)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 03:18 PM
1

Women do the exact same shit as the Madonna/whore thing, they complain about how much they hate men while still thirsting over them physically (generally including the ones they hate), it's just less openly observed because men are still traditionally tasked with pursuing partners (an arrangement that women are generally fine with when it suits them)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 12:05 AM
4

Yeah, even when I was a broke college student you'd be amazed how many Indian and Filipina women especially kept trying to message me on social media, many of them as a prelude to an attempt at relationship, just because my profile showed me as fairly tall and blond
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 10:25 AM
2

Yeah, I agree that there is the possibility of someone trying to act out fantasies in real life to try and escalate the pleasure of simulation, but I think nearly anyone consciously seeking a robot to simulate illegal acts with understands the moral implications of doing those acts to real people and why to avoid it, and therefore consciously can hold themselves back from this escalation There might be a thin sliver of people mentally ill enough to not be able to restrain themselves in this way,…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 06:10 PM
1

When they start trying to act like it's the same thing as real life assault against them, or try to insist it's somehow responsible for that through vague cultural influences, it's pretty reasonable to care if you're the person being blamed by buying one Besides, those who believe that the emotional component is so lacking from this that only the most repulsive of people would consider buying a sex robot vastly overestimate the value of having your partner take out their existing emotional bagga…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 05:56 PM
4

If particular women feel "dehumanised" by someone who doesn't automatically gratify them wanting to have sex with them, they can't get too upset when something without humanity is able to offer more than they do to that person
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 05:44 PM
4

As long as the person using the robot is a grown adult and capable of telling the difference between fiction and reality, how is this line of argument any different from "video games cause real life violence"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 05:35 PM
2

I've seen plenty of women try to weaponise virginity or lack of romantic success against a man when it suits them in an argument, honestly probably even more than the inverse
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 12:26 AM
1

I think you are complaining about two different groups of men to be honest
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:21 AM
1

I'm not sure how the act of being (consensually) degraded in physical sex is any more psychologically damaging or inherently harmful than doing so in written form
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 01:43 AM
1

As I tried to explain to the original commenter but was mass downvoted for some reason, it is the same reasoning as "video games cause violence" - the assumption that everyone except yourself is too different to tell the difference between fantasy and reality
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:41 PM
4

I bring up anal because that's what half the screed you copy-pasted above was about, and the only act listed there that by the author's admission caused actual harm My point is just because something involves risks doesn't make it self harm, including rough sex, and you cannot willingly abuse someone - if someone asks you to do something and you freely decide to do it, you are no more at fault for it than they are. Merely wanting something is not an attack on the person whom it's wanted from
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 08:23 PM
4

As I recall, Lana willingly signed up to have sex with someone who exclusively shoots extreme porn and only complained about it a long time later on - regretting something you willingly agreed to and could reasonably look into what it involved beforehand is not violation. However, people are generally more reluctant to watch stuff like that if you call attention to it - the small handful who genuinely enjoy suffering would be watching it anyway, but most would condemn it People routinely do acts…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 07:58 PM
6

If whoever made this post sincerely believes she was essentially raped, and wants everyone else to do something about it, why wouldn't she name the people or studio which did that to her, or which content to actually avoid? That would do a lot more to reform the industry than an endless string of anonymous pitiful testimonies containing already known information about the consequences of unprepared rough sex, which were already publicly accessible at the time this person signed up to do it, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 07:27 PM
1

They do a lot more than most sites to get rid of it, as shown by them deleting more than half their stuff It's not "Orwellian" to point out that you aren't put into a lower social class or status by doing anal, your hangups about certain sex acts being "depraved" are not an axiom of life
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 07:09 PM
0

Pornhub does have a "report abuse" section, as does, by law, every website that hosts porn - the number of confirmed nonconsensual uploads (in the low hundreds, as I recall) generated way less money for them than it cost to maintain a system of removing content Again, something reminding you in appearance of abuse or violence is not the same as actual violence - believe it or not, there are a non-negligible number of women who are into rough sex, and do not mind leveraging that for money; just b…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 06:48 PM
-2

"Couldn't verify" isn't the same as actually hosting illegal content - pretty much every other social media platform received far more complains of nonconsensual or abusive material uploaded at the same time, even by proportion, but no one called for them to delete half their user uploads If your criticism amounts to "it reminds me of something bad therefore it actually is the same thing, and everyone except me is too stupid to take responsibility for their actions based on the media they look a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 05:56 PM
4

People agreeing to have sex in a way you find distasteful isn't "abuse", and I have yet to see any evidence that any significant number of people who make porn are held against their will I agree with making it harder for kids to get access to but let's not pretend that rough sex only started or became popular because of it, just because that's where you first heard of it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 05:36 PM
1

I don't agree with the aspect of redpill ideology of blaming women as a whole for it, but the fact remains that there are plenty of women who choose relationships with men who are openly abusive to begin with (and to an extent this is true with men too, the idea of "crazy girls" and so on), so the reasoning that male romantic unsuccessfulness can only be down to women having detected their abusiveness is false and almost exclusively used as a line of attack against any unsuccessful man who bemoa…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:54 AM
16

Great, I'll feel so much better knowing the person who attacked me was the same gender
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 12:27 AM
1

Precisely my point, "there are positive and negative things about this" applies to literally everything, I'm not sure why this post was necessary then other than to overemphasise the negatives
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 03:38 PM
1

Yeah, and that's contradicted by the rest of the post
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 09:43 AM
1

If you think that having sex with lots of people makes you inherently lesser, to the extent that people can only do so if they've suffered, that sounds like more of a you problem than anyone else I am continually baffled by people who think that anyone with a different value system than them is repressing trauma, and that they're doing them a favour by telling them what's best for them
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 12:57 AM
6

I don't know, women were subjugated far worse for centuries before private property came about, it was the social revolution that came from the rise of private property as the main form of political and economic power, instead of feudal obligations, which led to the push for women's rights as much as anything Again, being able to give birth is not an economic class or an inherent angle of subjugation, any more than men are subjugated by being expected to bear responsibility for impregnating a wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:01 PM
2

Hilariously ironic that the people who complain so much about being reduced to their identities cannot conceive of someone not like them having been wronged in a way that doesn't align to their flowchart of Real OppressionTM There is no legal right that men have access to in the developed world today that women do not as well, they are no more systemically oppressed on that basis
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:50 PM
9

Patriarchal societies existed for thousands of years before capital accumulation, and women aren't victimised by having the ability to bear children any more than men are victimised by being expected to provide for them and their wives in traditional society - both groups rely on their children to provide for them in turn when they get old, if women all went on a "birth strike" they'd stand to lose every bit as much as men I don't like mapping identitarianism on economic classes but this is lite…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:37 PM
3

Feeling upset at something accessible to everyone else being arbitrarily denied to you isn't "entitlement", so much as having a spine
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 02:29 AM
2

Sure, but how is it MORE disgusting to take someone up on an offer to have group sex with them than to make the offer in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:39 AM
2

Funny to say that femdom is less generic than maledom, I've literally never met a woman who was into it for anything other than a misdirected revenge fantasy over the time a guy was mean to her, and didn't even bother to try and act like anything else
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 06:27 AM
1

And your argument is just as pandering, relying on the "modest woman" to be automatically more invested in a romantic than a physical relationship, or less experience meaning less pleasure. Every argument has to offer something to the person it's trying to convince, that's not some evil male desire. Also wanting to have a sexually pleasurable partner did not originate from porn
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 04:06 PM
0

I don't know where exactly you're getting this from other than your various sexual neuroses (your belief that any non-standard sexual desire originates from porn) - if you consider that mutually exclusive to the emotional aspect that's really more your problem, and it's not some horribly unfair persecution that your presumably male partner actually wants you to offer something of value for their romantic attention Also lmao at sincerely calling the women who want something different from you pic…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 12:19 AM
1

Both the examples you gave justifiably received more backlash than support, and affected mainly celebrities, who are generally judged for their appearance, male or female. Some women do this too, I've seen them discuss unsolicited whether they prefer skinnier or musclier actors and project their own fantasised scenarios onto them, but that's only seen as less objectifying because it's dressed up in softer language, even though it is the same demand of someone else's body
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 01:18 AM
1

Yeah, I've also had strangers make unsolicited comments about my personal life (including as a group) without providing examples of why they are particularly better, that's not an unfairly gendered thing
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 12:56 AM
3

At least as much of online discourse is women complaining about men that don't attract them, or stereotyping the ones that do, in equally dismissive or cruel terms - hell, a couple days ago I got downvoted simply for pointing out that men with desires for simulated dominance aren't all loser neckbeards who simultaneously are an active threat to women and want to oppress them. I won't deny redpillers do the same but if you want to believe your ideology is better than theirs you do have to act lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:37 PM
1

For the people who experience severe debilitating depression from an inability to have sex, even if they're a minority of non-sex havers, how is it falsifiably any less severe than in the minds of those who experience depression from becoming isolated? There are people who can handle long periods of isolation without the same depression or mental problems that prisoners get from being involuntarily confined. Also we age-restrict plenty of risky activities If your concern is that I think women sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:43 PM
1

Pointing out that the task of selecting, generally less risky in modern dating than pursuing in terms of social consequences, is an advantage that women have nowadays isn't "absolving men of their agency" "You don't NEED sex" yeah and you don't NEED social interaction to live, but it's pretty clear that going for long periods of time without it will mess you up mentally - it isn't oppression, but neither is having to interact with someone that made you uncomfortable (certainly no worse than anyt…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 08:46 PM
1

Ok, fair enough - I guess a long term relationship. In any case though the scheme in the original post would be extremely unlikely to work
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 03:22 PM
1

The transaction is a long term relationship in exchange for the benefits of a green card or more money, which is understood by both. If it's a punishment to be in that relationship, maybe she shouldn't have agreed to it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 03:10 PM
2

I know, I said that was scummy in another comment, but still no more so than pretending to care about someone to get a green card and money and then divorcing them - in any case I doubt such a scheme would work. My objection was to the general assumption about travelling abroad for relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 02:41 PM
1

That "living" a fantasy is any different from simulating it - they aren't actually being economically abused as long as they're not held against their will
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 02:33 PM
1

If you're talking about stuff like findom, sure, but keyword is "simulated" - the guys who do that are weird, but rarely in a position where they can't afford it Besides, trying to offer stable financial status as an incentive to date isn't necessarily abusive - when asked a while ago what they had to offer in a relationship, a lot of women here said they make a lot of money or have good degrees rather than anything about personality
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 02:30 PM
1

BDSM isn't an economic thing
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 02:25 PM
1

It sounds more like insurance in case their partner tries to be dishonest about their intention to marry - it seems scummy but no more so that pretending to care about someone for their passport
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 02:24 PM
1

This coming from the group who call women "pick mes" and anti feminist for being more pleasant or attractive to potential partners
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 12:39 PM
1

Half of these things are just vague gestures that society mostly already does - it turns out trying to shame a problem away doesn't work, and as long as men are tasked with being the ones who pursue a relationship, women are going to have to be ok with receiving messages on dating apps that don't automatically gratify them
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 10:15 PM
1

They can still learn to behave like civilised people, and understand that people who steal and cheat usually get punished
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:33 PM
1

Having emotional baggage from a past relationship is fine, I just can't stand people who think they get a pass to generalise about or resent the identity of their partner because of it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:41 PM
1

Well the ones agreeing support the premise that the men who disagree with them personally haven't "deserved" a partner who is willing to trust them and follow their lead on particular issues, rather than simply being unfortunate in dating the same way many of them have. They can only argue against a neckbeard stereotype when asked what exactly they might offer to merit devotion in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:53 PM
1

Well neither am I, but if you're going to talk shit about a common part of people's appearances for political point scoring you shouldn't be surprised when you get lumped in with the former group
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:16 PM
1

It tapers slightly but no more than most peoples, you'd have to be more obsessed than the guy who initially posted this to care about that sort of thing
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:08 PM
1

As though most of the people here whining about men don't obsess over the ones that gratify them just as much
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 11:57 AM
1

If you think that's a double chin your standards must be the Habsburgs
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 11:56 AM
2

And yet you still whine about us more than enough
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:13 AM
1

Blue pillers in this thread really struggling with an argument beyond "lol I bet this guy hasn't been laid"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:05 AM
1

What, because they have the spine to go after what they want in a consenting relationship? No one who spends a sizeable chunk of the day willingly arguing with people they hate gets to call anyone else "neurotic"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:35 AM
-1

You weren't complaining about people who politically identify as dominant, you were complaining about anyone who has a sexual fantasy that they describe and which you dislike, hence the need to make it a personal attack, which still makes you more of a dick than any of the guys you're complaining about. That you think being "dominant" or "submissive" in bed needs to be tied to income or appearance, or that it's an ideological failing when it isn't, is precisely related to the OP's belief that fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:42 PM
1

Truthfully, I would like a partner who trusts me enough to act at submitting, something they wouldn't ordinarily do, but who is obviously capable of intelligent discussion and disagreement and doesn't believe anyone to be genuinely inferior or superior - honestly I see more blue pillers than red pillers acting disingenuous about this to say "oh so you want a slave", because apparently they can't tell the difference between fiction and actual politics and assume every other woman is too stupid to…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:29 PM
1

Well yeah, being the gender typically tasked with pursuing means you have to pursue more, it's not too surprising
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:24 PM
2

And what makes you think that the people who disagree with you online aren't "masculine" enough for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:17 PM
1

And every woman I've met who's considered themselves dominant is just extremely neurotic about all their past relationships with men and insists on taking it out on unrelated people, but still, I try not to generalise about people I don't personally know Truly funny though that you couldn't even make it through "I'm fine with kink things" without needing to call the people who do it while daring to disagree with you ugly Also I love that you cast the women as uniquely victimised just cause that'…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:16 PM
1

Well, those women can't be too upset when men would rather try their luck somewhere like Bangkok or Amsterdam where they can at least act interested enough for less
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 08:51 PM
2

Conversely, if men in poverty can manage to avoid resorting to gay sex work, then so can the women who insist straight sex work is a uniquely terrible and degrading to make money
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:31 PM
0

Being more able to empathise with someone does increase the chance of emotional connection which is a pretty big factor in sex - it has nothing to do with pity. Just because you can't imagine finding a man attractive if he admits his problems to you doesn't mean that every woman secretly agrees with you
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 11:02 PM
0

Well yeah, nearly every political movement treats nonbelievers (particularly those of the demographic they profess to care about) as either too weak or too stupid to know what's best for them - like feminists complaining about "pick mes"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 10:58 PM
3

Men did organise against the draft though - that's why the draft hasn't been used since Vietnam. Still doesn't change the fact that it's not unfair to be asked to care about it, even if it doesn't affect you (just as a man should be asked to care about abortion even if it doesn't affect him)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 10:48 PM
0

If they really don't want to be there they are more than welcome to say so upfront - it is not a man's fault if a woman chooses to be duplicitous for short-term profit. If you want the result of doing something (the money) that's not too different from wanting the thing itself (the sex, on the guy's end)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 10:43 PM
0

Everyone pays for sex with some amount of time or attention - if you can get the same amount of satisfaction for less hassle I don't really see how that's a failure
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 10:36 PM
1

Believing that romantic failures are purely down to individual failings is very much the root of the just world hypothesis - it becomes fallacious if you then criticise the just world hypothesis when it's applied to economic success, but not when it comes to relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 11:42 PM
2

I recall in my home country a series of high profile pedophilia cases committed by groups of non white men led to prejudice against that group - funnily enough, I do blame them
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:32 AM
2

I wasn't able to watch the video without a tiktok account - based on the summaries given here though, there's nothing in it that suggests she denies exploitation, just pushes back on the idea that the majority of those involved are exploited
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 05:49 PM
1

I never said that, but when you're dating someone, even in a foreign country, you're not exactly anonymous
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 05:05 PM
1

Merely having the ability to do something is not the same as doing it, and doesn't necessarily lend someone to unethical behaviour - it's possible for the wealthy to get away with sex crimes as easily in America as in most developing countries, but we don't make that assumption about every wealthy man in America. As long as those involved are upfront about their intentions (either to date or hook up), which they generally are when posting about it online, the inherent implications aren't particu…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:56 PM
3

As much as I keep hearing about it, I have yet to see any example of one of these poor, exploited women complain about the current movement of "passport bros", only those who imagine they're speaking for them - almost as though women in other countries, even developing ones, are just as capable of making decisions about potential partners based on what they say and do as in the west. I don't agree with the whole "Western women are degenerate" narrative, obviously, but there are plenty of reasons…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 10:54 AM
1

Sure, but it doesn't do anything to help the latter group by blaming the former
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 10:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter