TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tastytatsu Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by Tastytatsu on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Circumcision is cruel and unnecessary? You don't say!
/r/MensRights11/05/19 09:22 PM
1

The percent of males in the U.S. who are cut falls around 70%, IIRC.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 04:24 AM
3

That's "in your case". You were lucky, but not everybody is.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 04:15 AM
3

I'm going to go out on a limb here, and assume that you weren't having sexual encounters of any sort at the age of 12. Thus, you have no memory of the foreskin's function.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 04:14 AM
4

How so?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 04:10 AM
2

You, sir/madam, are the kind of person I wish I could see more of on reddit. Thank you for being a human being who is open to reason based growth.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 04:09 AM
2

So it's not a human till it exits the womb? Or did you set some arbitrary line of humanity? Your right it's not mutilation its murder. I don't even want to open that can of worms with you in the middle of a discussion on a completely different contentious topic. I'd engage with you somewhere else about it, though. Female GM is primarily used to stop "promiscuity" basically to make sex unenjoyable that's wrong. You don't think male circumcision makes sex less pleasurable? Here are some examples o…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 04:04 AM
1

I'm glad to have made you see the truth of your actions, and hope that you realize I bear no ill will to the past ignorance of your choices! Cheers to being somebody who can learn and grow!
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:30 AM
2

Wdym? I'm just a dude who finds legalised child abuse unethical, and found some people to help enlighten. I don't blame people with morals borne of ignorance for their actions, at least not particularly. However, once you are shown facts which explicitly state your ignorance, yet you still press on in your harmful beliefs, you become complicit and willfully ignorant, which is evil.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 02:15 AM
4

Why the ad hominem? Is it because you don't have an actual rebuttal?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:12 PM
2

This is the equivalent of saying that artificially colorblinding your child at birth won't affect their eyesight. Just because they don't know what color looks like, doesn't mean that they aren't affected.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:08 PM
2

ridiculous, sensational, and mostly untrue. Care to give examples of the above in my arguments? I decline to engage with you. Or do you just not want to face the truth? ​
/r/MensRights21/03/19 06:07 AM
4

Nice ad hominem. Do you have an actual argument, or can you just admit that you're wrong? Remorse is the first step to redemption, after all.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:48 AM
0

the tissue is sold, and it's very valuable I don't really like to get personal, but on this I will. You subhuman piece of shit. You are suggesting that it is okay to sell away little children's body parts -no less, their non-consensually removed genitalia-, and what's more, people deserve to make money off of it? Do you know where the foreskin tissue goes? In to lotion for celebrities to apply to their faces at spas. You can look this up, it's publicly acknowledged fact. Whatever imitation of me…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:44 AM
2

decreased risk of urinary tract infection, no phimosis, no paraphimosis, and a lower risk of penile cancer. Would you like to post the rates at which these are decreased? Thanks in advance. easier to maintain hygiene Per literally any website on circumcision, this just means that you have to tech uncircumcised boys to wash underneath the foreskin. Doing so takes 20 seconds at max per day. This reason is laughably inconsequential, and is not in any way shape or form an argument against circumcisi…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:36 AM
1

Why? Would you like to explain?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:30 AM
1

Yes, but it's beneficial to the child. There are few to no benefits of circumcision, and many drawbacks.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:29 AM
2

That is why instead of just removing the foreskin ( a retroactive solution), we destigmatise phallic hygiene (a more proactive solution)?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:26 AM
4

Your evidence is andectotal, and therefore not an arguement. Try the below study. In the largest study on circumcision in South Korea, Seoul University found 33% of men who were circumcised during adulthood reported difficulty attaining sexual gratification, 63% said masturbation less enjoyable, and 11% had "frequent" orgasm difficulties. (Kim, Peng et all, Seoul University) ​
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:23 AM
3

If you're 100% confidence doesn't come through because, you know, your child learns about the negative effects of circumcision, then you have caused irreversible damage to an intrinsic part of your child's psyche. Your logic is the same as those who say "Everybody else is jumping off of a bridge, I should as well! If I don't they'll judge me!!!!!1!!!111!"
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:16 AM
6

It seems that people are unable to get this in to your skull. Still, I'll try. Regardless of your opinions on circumcision, and post-circumcision phallic aesthetics, you have no right to decide that for your child. Once they reach an age where they can legally consent of their own volition, it is their choice. Until then, to do so without your child's consent is tantamount to abuse.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:11 AM
6

safe https://med.stanford.edu/newborns/professional-education/circumcision/complications.html I don't know about safe... normal https://circinfo.net/who_in_the_world_gets_circumcised.html as of 2016, only 38% of men worldwide were circumcised. Normal fails to apply as well. ​
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:06 AM
2

You cant say with 100% percent certainty that all circumaized men have neurological effects of trauma. You can't say with 100% certainty that getting shot in the face will kill you. Still, we don't do it because that's what happens a vast majority of the time. Inb4 "You're comparing circumcision to shooting somebody in the face!" No. I'm not. I'm saying that using logic centered around the phrase "Not 100% of the time" (Despite trauma occurring at a high rate post-circumcision) when discussing a…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:49 AM
1

So then, having read the excellent rebuttal provided above, you, a sensible human, will be anti-circumcision! :)
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:41 AM
6

Every single man who ever had it has never complained about it. That's because they were infants, and had no memory of the procedure. I would never and have no knowledge of a single person that ever said "i wish i never been circumcised." Literally look at comments in this thread from people who were circumcised and are trying to artificially undo the process.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:37 AM
5

infected dicks that smell like vomit. Would you like to give statistics on this statement concerning what I can only assume to be natural penises?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:34 AM
2

What would you describe circumcision as?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:32 AM
3

Because male circumcision is so common in the states, few Americans realize how rare it is most everywhere else. The practice has fallen by the wayside in Australia, Canada, Britain and New Zealand, and fewer than one-fifth of all male Europeans are circumcised. In December, the Danish Medical Association recommended ending the practice for boys, arguing that because it permanently alters the body it should be “an informed, personal choice” that young men make for themselves. In Germany, a distr…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:27 AM
5

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage Literally look up circumcision trauma and this article is the top result. I know that it's a hard pill to swallow, and nobody blames you for your parents' decisions, but yes, trauma is a documented consequence of circumcision.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:24 AM
3

It’s been a practice that’s happened for hundreds of years The same was true of slavery. Not an argument. It’s totally healthy and safe. So is getting your fingernails surgically removed, but why would you do that? It’s not abuse. You are removing pieces of a child's body without their consent. How is this not abuse? Once again, if I as a parent decided to chop off your earlobes as a child, there would be major problems, seeing as how that is also abuse. I’m circumcised and I feel totally fine w…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:05 AM
4

So surgery is rape. Got it. Cool. Nobody said that, you're just strawmanning. Now on to the actual rebuttal. It’s not child abuse or bodily harm. A part of that child's dick is permanently removed. That in itself is amputation, of PERFECTLY HEALTHY AND BIOLOGICALLY NORMAL TISSUE. A comparable equivalent would be removing your child's fingertips at birth, because it takes 10 seconds longer to scrub under them when you wash your hands. If this is not proof enough of the fact that the process is bo…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter