Taxonomyoftaxes Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
19	We got you bro It's not even Manlet tier in the Netherlands, you're only 2 inches below average height	/r/MensRights	18/02/19 05:44 AM
1	Tyson knows You say my argument is illogical and yours doesn't even have any clear train of reasoning. You jump from the premise that government neccesitates compromise to the conclusion it's not important to have a diverse government, with literally no link in between. Thats not a logical argument, that's not even an argument. Just two unrelated sentences. But yeah, I'm the one who's illogical because you disagree with me.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/08/17 05:51 PM
1	Tyson knows I never said that, I said it is unlikely a group made almost entirely of members of one ethnic, sexual, or socioeconomic grouping could accurately represent the concerns of all of the people that are in their out groups. This doesn't mean they don't care about them, or that they would never side with them.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/08/17 05:49 PM
-1	Tyson knows No, my hypothetical is important and brings out relevant issues relating to the matter. Even if all of the most qualified politicians in some nation were of one ethnic or sexual or socioeconomic grouping, an assembly composed only of those people would not be a good governing body.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 05:31 PM
0	Tyson knows http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2009EO030002/full http://science.sciencemag.org/content/306/5702/1686 Here are two papers one from 2009 and one from 2004. Both establish that there is indeed a consensus view amongst climate scientists as to whether or not climate change was indeed real. The consensus view is that climate change is indeed real and is mostly caused by human activity. So here we have two experts who subsequently surveyed hundreds of other experts and came to the conclusi…	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 03:02 PM
0	Tyson knows Which is why I used the term consensus multiple times, indicating the majority of experts in the field hold this opinion. Should I have to cite Shakespeare if I use a word he came up with? You are so profoundly ignorant in regards to the topic which you are discussing that I don't feel any need to do any work for you. If you want to talk about climate change in any meaningful way you should already be aware of these things.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 02:49 PM
4	Tyson knows No I'm not, this is a hypothetical. I'm saying even in a hypothetical situation where that were the case, a government composed merely of those people would not make for a good government.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 02:48 PM
1	Tyson knows So you're a lawyer who is unaware of what an expert witness is? I have to say I find that rather unlikely. Is not bringing in an expert witness, relying upon their qualifications and work in the field to lend credence to their arguments, the exact type of "appeal to authority" argument you are claiming does not work? If you really are a lawyer I feel sorry for any client you have, both because of how horrible you must be to deal with, but also for how horribly inept their defender is. There is s…	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 02:43 PM
2	Tyson knows And you're the one saying other people don't know how to form an argument while you decide to resort to insulting people who disagree with you. If you aren't aware that it's thr consensus position that climate change is real and man made among experts in the scientific fields related to earth's climate you don't even have the baseline of knowledge neccesarry to talk about the subject in any meaningful way. I just read your username and I have to say I have to doubt you could possibly be a lawyer…	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 02:35 PM
1	Tyson knows Your response doesn't even correspond with what I said. Claim I can't make a cogent argument all you want but you can't even fucking read.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 02:30 PM
1	Tyson knows You obviously can't read because I addressed this argument in my comment. I did make a rather cogent argument and I think you need to realize that there are different types of fallacies to make this type of an appeal to authority argument is not fallicious as I am simply arguing in terms of probabilities that it is far more likely that learned people in a certain field have some idea of what is right than it is that people who have spent no time studying that subject are right about the facts pe…	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 02:26 PM
4	Tyson knows Both are very well established. Experts and leading thinkers in both the fields of climate science and geophysics, and leading thinkers and people in the know in national security and foreign affairs respectively agree that both of the things I said are established facts. Uneducated or unqualified people disagreeing and saying these things are not facts has no bearing on whether or not they are the truth. I'm well aware this an argument from authority, but when almost all of the people who have …	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 02:23 PM
103	Tyson knows The qualification argument doesn't even make sense even if it were true all current senators and congressmen were truly the most qualified people to run the country. The house is supposed to be a representative assembly and that term representative is key. I know that just means people elect representatives to argue for their interests in their behalf, but I believe the assembly should represent the people. How could the house truly represent all the concerns of various communities of minorities…	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 01:57 PM
1	Tyson knows The men that are elected are quite obviously not the most qualified given how useless they have been this senate term and how they vehemently deny established facts like climate change is real or Russia tried to influence the election result.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/17 01:53 PM
4	Woman pushes over policeman as a joke and promptly gets arrested I;m thinking about thos Beans	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/06/17 04:32 AM
13	Daily Beast writes piece indicating one of this subreddits' founders is a GOP lawmaker. Does not understand how every word she writes just makes RP stronger. I hope no woman ever has the misfortune of dating any of you people. You don't see them as other humans, just sex holes. Why don't you just buy a fleshlight if that's why you really believe?	/r/TheRedPill	26/04/17 02:23 AM
17	Daily Beast writes piece indicating one of this subreddits' founders is a GOP lawmaker. Does not understand how every word she writes just makes RP stronger. Their companionship, their thoughts, their support, and their love. Those are a few things that women bring into a relationship.	/r/TheRedPill	26/04/17 02:21 AM
3	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap I'm saying it's a burden which I don't think is deniable	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 11:31 PM
59	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Why is the male horse the one with all of the burden put onto them? Why does the comic act like women are not also burdened. Women are frequently shut out of senior management positions, theyre refused maternity leave, they have to do signifigant amounts of unpaid labour as home makers, women are not paid as much for working the exact same jobs (although the gap is far smaller under this definition and is somewhere in the 90% range), let alone the sexual harassment that is still very present in …	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 05:44 AM
5	Woman punches man at a Trump rally but didn't think he would defend himself. Great rebuttal	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/11/16 03:23 AM
1	University Of Chicago to incoming freshman: "We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces” You're pathetic	/r/PussyPassDenied	31/08/16 02:26 PM
1	University Of Chicago to incoming freshman: "We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces” r/iamverysmart	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/08/16 06:41 AM
-1	University Of Chicago to incoming freshman: "We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces” Like I said, somehow I'm the one with fragile feelings. Get over yourself you sensitive fuck	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/08/16 06:16 PM
1	University Of Chicago to incoming freshman: "We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces” You should suspend or expell people for expressing their right to freedom of thought and expression? Shit, and you complain about how sjws are crowding people out. I think you need to actually go and spend some time with these people you seem to understand so intimately and you'll find a lot of what you think is a misconception. You base your view of these people on YouTube videos of protesters and reports from people they disagree with. I could create a video compilation that made it seem like …	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/08/16 04:45 PM
-4	University Of Chicago to incoming freshman: "We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces” Yeah I'm the one with sensitive "feelies" when you start defending Trump when he isn't even mentioned	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/08/16 02:55 PM
-5	University Of Chicago to incoming freshman: "We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces” I think in general this entire warning is entirely disingenuous. All these posts I see here are saying it's great that these "sjws can't get away with their absolute bullshit anymore" but there is a huge misunderstanding and hypocrisy in these criticisms. I do not understand what is fundamentally wrong about letting people know what you're talking about could be upsetting to people. That's simply considerate, people act as though giving a "trigger warning" is a form of censorship, but it doesn't…	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/08/16 02:10 PM
12	University Of Chicago to incoming freshman: "We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces” Yes, trying to take into consideration how your words can affect others is the absolute cancer of our society.	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/08/16 01:59 PM
-4	University Of Chicago to incoming freshman: "We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces” And the rest of us don't? We're almost all university students here.	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/08/16 01:56 PM
-10	University Of Chicago to incoming freshman: "We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces” I'm ashamed that you are a Canadian	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/08/16 01:56 PM
10	Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool" Shit isn't whack. Buzzfeed is essentially a collection of semi professional bloggers. Of course they're going to have mixed messages. Wouldn't you be MORE upset if it turned out they were explicitly telling their writers what to say and what ideals to promote?	/r/MensRights	05/08/16 03:08 PM