TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TeaHaunting1593 Archive

View 0 posts and 85 comments by TeaHaunting1593 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

It would would be much better if they showed a boy being abused and neglected as a child and developing a violent personality as a response to this which is what actually happens in these cases.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/25 08:08 AM
2

Realistically there's not really any specific white or hetero issues. And I find the really ridiculous racial and sexuality related stuff is a lot more restricted to niche communities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/25 08:03 AM
3

The one in that article is Hassan Sentamu and he just got sentenced qlook it up
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/25 07:07 AM
3

In literally talking about the teddy bear one you mentioned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 08:28 PM
12

I mean, but it is true, just not all the time or in all situations. It is extremely common in feminist discourse to see it described as generally true, usually based on their ideology. Both are sexist, both are wrong, both support and uphold systemic sexism. It's the people criticising 'systemic sexism' who make this claim in the first place. I'm new to the sub. Can you give me a general idea of what feminist theory is criticized? Ideas like the west being a patriarchy characterised by men actin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 11:05 AM
13

I mean because the feminists who make this claim about women all being taught to be selfless and caring try to defend it by linking it to patriarchy and then acting like the claim is above criticism. So they take something that isn't actually true and insist that it's true because it's what their theory says should be true. This subreddit is left wing but generally critical of feminist theory, or at least many of the claims and attitudes derived from feminist theory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 10:19 AM
12

I'm saying that claiming women as a group are caring and selfless and that men as a group are selfish is sexist (and not accurate). Trying to dress this is up by claiming it is part of a theoretical 'structure' doesn't change that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 09:43 AM
17

I'm saying that the idea that women are raised to be caring and men are raised to be selfish is sexist and inaccurate and that there as many selfish women as there are selfish men and plenty of women who treat people poorly (,again, as there are men).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 09:14 AM
14

Except its nonsense because in actual cases like this the children are virtually always pathologically violent from a young age overwhelmingly due to experiencing severe violence and instability at young ages. Not simply 'led astray'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 08:12 AM
42

It isn't based on research it's just a TV writers take. In actual real life cases like the Hassan Sentamu case the killers are usually always pathologically violent from a young age due to experiencing severely violent and unstable childhoods. The idea that regular boys are just being 'radicalised' is pop psychology. Being talked down and blamed in schools based on a fucking TV show is going to alienate boys more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 08:06 AM
17

This isn't an incel page. A lot of the men here have actually beeline victimised
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 08:01 AM
26

No that's not possible you see patriarchal misogyny raise women to be caring nurturers you see patriarchy forces women to always prioritise men's needs. Or some nonsense like that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 07:59 AM
67

I may be wrong but I got the impression that this show was basically more 'incel' panic mongering nonsense. From what I've read the premise is basically that a normal kid with loving parents who goes and gets radicalised online and becomes a murderer which is just ridiculous pop psychology and is not something that happens. The actual real life murderer who inspired this was beaten and abused in Uganda as a child and ended up in foster care as a teen and already had issues with pathlogical viole…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/25 11:54 PM
4

progressive feminists These feminists are the ones less engaged with feminism as a movement. The more actively engaged with feminist theory and organisations the less likely they are to be willing to even discuss mens issues in good faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/25 10:13 PM
6

discussion of the problems being experienced by a minority of boys; improving their lot would do a huge amount to make life better for both sexes. While I welcome any willingness to recognised mens issues it still frustrates me that these people are so unwilling to recognise that these problems come from biases affecting men in general (not a minority) and I hate that there is still this insistence on framing helping boys as a good thing because it will benefit women indirectly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 08:22 AM
3

Yeah there aren't really any 'white' specific social issues or discrimination against white people at a society wide level. There ARE society wide biases and is society-level discrimination against men, in some areas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 08:35 AM
21

I love whe they bring up the 'cool girl' speech as if it's inspiring when it's literally just 'I feel some pressure to meet social expectations so I killed people and tried to destroy someone's life'. Really tell on themselves witht that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 10:11 AM
3

It's literally just propaganda to try win male support. Vance does not care one bit about actual male issues beyond appealing to his 'trigger the libs' base.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 10:07 AM
3

They will literally work to cover up our existence then claim that they are the only ones who care about us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/25 07:19 AM
3

I remember reading her site and she claimed that she was getting hit on in pubs and then beaten up for rejecting men and this was happening in full view of everyone every month or so. It was so obviously a ridiculous lie and also dripping with narcissism (all these guys were just so attracted to her).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/25 07:17 AM
2

The passage talks about how moralising against men is a negative and ignores systemic arguments like anti-capitalism Sure it brings it up but the rest of the article then agrees with all core feminist arguments. It really isn't criticising feminism the this dub henerally does. It's just saying that class should also be considered. It's a nothing-y article. And to be honest liberal feminists are not the issue. Liberal feminists are usually the ones who are still willing to recognise men have real…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/25 08:39 AM
20

I remember watching feminist journalists lie through their teeth to defend Amber Heard despite hours of audio of her being abusive. They would defend the women that have abused me and close friends because they are women. I also live in a country where feminist-advised policies come very close to denying the abuse I have experienced from women is possible. You also see pushes to seriously undermine standards of evidence for rape specifically and advocating special courts for it. I have seen 'res…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/25 11:22 PM
43

I mean i suspect they are disagreeing with the part where the article literally agrees with the entire current left zeitgeist that men are collective oppressors who are ubiversally privileged and driven by a desire to exert power over women. It agrees with the entire approach to gender this sub criticises. All it does is sprinkle a few little comments about how class is important too. Which doesn't really do much. The attitude of this article is still one that would deny the possibility of men s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/25 11:16 PM
27

I guarantee the women who talk like this treat their partners like dirt.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/02/25 07:56 AM
1

Except there is actual evidence of Amber being abusive and there's loads of people who have talked about MM being a complete creep.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/02/25 10:15 PM
1

Depp is bajillionaire and had to go through two traumatising trials, has hours of audio showing amber's abusive behaviour, and STILL has feminist groups disbelieving him.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/02/25 07:24 AM
1

Tbh Marilyn mansion I think is guilty. Depp definitely isn't though and will Smith has clearly been fucked up by the woman he married.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/02/25 07:23 AM
1

Amber lied that he raped her with a bottle. She made up the story to try to imply he has erectile dysfunction to try to further humiliate him which is typical abuser behaviour.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/02/25 07:22 AM
1

mean come on, he texted his friend about fucking her corpse. He told one very obviously over the top dark joke while venting about an abusive partner. If you listen the actual audio he is generally very patient even when being screamed at. His ex partners partners have strongly stressed that he was an incredibly caring and supportive partner. He clearly has mental health and impulse control issues and a quite crude and childish sense of humour but I don't think its really fair to call him scum o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 09:43 AM
5

This is spot on what it is. This sort of person pushes the ideology they see as benefiting them, which in men leads to Andrew Tate style self-'improvement' and violence/abuse justifying behaviour because that is what predatory men are good at. In women it leads to this intense eternal victim narrative because thats what works more for women. It's why they get super hostile to the suggestion that men are shamed for vulnerability even though this should not clash with feminism in theory. Acknowled…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/25 08:30 AM
10

Honestly the people I've seen talk like this in real life were straight up horrible abusive people who treated their partners like shit. The whole 'men have mistreated me that's why I hate them' thing was basically just cover for their own harmful behaviour. Basically the only 'good' men to this kind of person are the ones who allow themselves to be treated like dirt and constantly apologise for existing. They have the same personality as male misogynists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/25 08:05 AM
5

The women who I have know who talk like this have been all round terrible and abusive people.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/01/25 03:39 AM
46

Fantastic comment. The state of Dv research is pretty abysmal. men who were in prison for dv, and asking them and their partners about the times the women had attacked them. Then concluded that women who hit their partners are being abused. Yep that's this one - Dobash and Dobash 2004: https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbjc%2Farticle-abstract%2F44%2F3%2F324%2F471260&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1736549568398&u=%23p%3DyMxVInCySn4J A lot of reviews of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/25 11:02 PM
17

Oh sorry another snippet: This meaning (the qualitative nature and severity of women and men’s experiences) is important for understanding what makes violence gendered and for addressing women and men’s varied experiences (e.g., through therapy, education, and prevention). For example, although men’s experiences of being coerced into performing oral sex on women need to be taken seriously, the context of patriarchal heterosexuality – in which women’s pleasure is deprioritized (Klein & Conley, Ci…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 02:02 AM
19

This is clearly a researcher searching for ways to downplay male victinisation: Although one cis man described a perpetrator who “[said] that they felt like ending the relationship if [he] didn’t want to have sex” (not clearly a threat to end the relationship if he did not give in), several women described clear threats to end the relationship or “find someone else” following refusals (e.g., “[he] threatened to not continue our relationship if I didn’t engage in oral sex”). You can see above the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 01:49 AM
11

Feminists are fighting to make it okay for men to cry / be in touch with their emotions!" A lot of the time when they say this it's more of a veiled snarky insult. They are calling men emotionally repressed/immature as an insult but disguising it as caring about men's issues. As you noted they are usually hostile or mocking to men who do actually express vulnerability.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 01:28 AM
22

Yeah that's why it's less active than this sub despite having 10 times as many subscribers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/25 09:08 PM
25

It's absolutely gross that they do that when those audio recordings exist. Usually bro pill is a bit better about this sort of thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/25 09:08 PM
60

I remember seeing a post that got locked because the men there were complaining a bit too much about expectations from society to be masculine. Like they were complaining about things feminists themselves criticise but it sounded a bit too much like men claiming tonhave systemic problems for the mod.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/25 08:57 PM
29

Ironically bropill isnt even as bad as some places for this. The ideology as pushed by the kinds of feminists on reddit pages is designed to create this feeling because it benefits them to have men feeling this way. Men like this will allow themselves to be walked over to make the guilt stop.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/25 08:53 PM
-1

Tbh I don't really have a problem with this one.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/25 11:39 AM
1

I mean we can compare it with the broader literature on the issue and recognise that the interpreting it as suggesting that men are 70% of victims does not fit other evidence.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 01:43 PM
0

Yeah but I mean that there will be some cases of 'reciprocal' violence that are actually cases of victims defending themselves, which is probably more common for female victims. This is not really 'reciprocal' in that only one party is being violent in an aggressive way. Once you account for these the rates of violence probably even out.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 01:23 PM
0

Honestly I wouldn't use this stat because it's an exaggeration. I think male victims are just more relcluctant to hit back which leads to more cases of female victims being labelled 'reciprocal'. Overall it's like that rate sof abusive behaviour are similar, with men committing more serious physical violence due to strength/ability to do so and women most likely using more emotional tactics (but still plenty of physical abuse in many cases). Trying to push stats claiming that men are the majorit…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 05:59 AM
28

Lol I know so many men who have been with women who used suicide threats and attempts as a form of emotional blackmail when they didn't get what they want. They expect me to believe these women are all just caring nurturers who worry about how it affects others.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/24 11:44 PM
1

I think a big part of it is just that straight women are more likely to want men to do the initiating so are less likely to ever be in a position where they might actually do something coercive because that requires you to be the initiating one.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/24 11:44 PM
2

No normal person who listens to the audio could support her. The actual evidence they use for this is extremely distorted or based on actually lies but they have posted it so much that the original sources of their arguments are obscured and they can just refer back to their own arguments. They throw out so many huge paragraphs that no one has the time to fact check what they say.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/12/24 10:55 PM
13

You can see this in Russia today where women make up Putin's biggest support base and men are sent to die en masse for Russia's 'survival'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/24 12:55 PM
5

Yeah they don't have to worry about not being able calling helplines because those lines say their policy is to treat your female abuser as the victim by default. Then reading that your own government doesn't think you exist but also not being able to claim to face any kind of discrimination
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/24 12:54 PM
5

Yeah similar position here
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 11:02 PM
7

Yep I'm one of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 11:02 PM
9

I saw a thread locked because people were complaining to much about pressures from masculinity. The mods felt it came too close to suggesting men had systemic issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 11:01 PM
33

You can see by the fact that it has almost fewer posts and less engagement than this sub despite being 10 times the size. It's mostly not a hugely helpful venue for mens issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 03:22 AM
19

It's not modern shortcomings. Feminism was like this a long time ago it's just that the existence of a huge number of real and urgent disadvantages for women in employment, marriage, law etc meant that these were took priority and theoretical problems with feminism had no real practical effects. Whereas now they have more direct impact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 03:19 AM
19

No if anything the disagreement is primarily theoretical. Feminism does not acknowledge that men can have systemic problems related to gender. They describe patriarchy as a system of oppression which is designed by and benefits only men. This has lots of harmful implications such as preventing recognition of any kind of systemic disadvantage for men in any facet of life. Which is why they downplay all men's issues other than those directly and exclusively caused by other men. Their theoretical a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 03:15 AM
31

your emphasis is on the practical solutions No we fundamentally disagree with menslib on what men's issues are. For example Menslib by definition does not believe that things like false accusations or any kind of particular legal vulnerability for men exists or can exist. This sub does. Menslib does not believe in any kind of systemic disadvantages affecting men (other than minor side effects of 'patriarchy' like men shaming other men). This sub does. This sub views gendered expectations and pre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 03:09 AM
2

This sub is generally critical of feminist theories and understanding of what mens issues are and how to address them, but mostly agrees with feminism's stated objectives regarding gender equality etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 03:05 AM
49

"limitations in measurement, primarily by using measures that do not consider relevant differences by gender in the motivations, context, or consequences of abuse. Namely, differences exist in the reporting of violence by gender." In some cases they 'prove' this by choosing samples specifically consisting of abusive men taken from criminal programs and women who were victims of those men. They then ask those people their motives and extrapolate this to the entire population. I'm not kidding. See…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/24 10:07 PM
3

It's literally just made up/and cherry picked nonsense so they can dismiss results that don't align with their ideology. In terms of sexual violence men almost definitely are more frequent perpetrators but the idea that female perpetration is overestimated is ridiculous. The same goes for the whole 'context and motivations' idea about domestic violence. The studies they use to claim women are only violent in defense are incredibly poor quality and I can go into a lot of detail on why.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/24 09:46 PM
9

Absolutely horrific fuck what Russia is doing. Infuriates me to no end that the gendered nature of this violence gets no mention.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/12/24 01:35 AM
22

"Man up" in different words. Honestly these people are sexists who use an ideology to pretend women never do anything wrong. Women like this treat people and especially men like dirt in real life. I guarantee they don't pull their weight in any relationships they are in. Also I love is how the whole 'women have built better support systems themselves' idea completely contradicts the other feminist response to issues like male suicide rates which is 'actually women attempt more etc'. Like which i…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/12/24 01:30 AM
24

I think for some there's the view that because they are still part of an 'in' group they can shit on men while still getting their gender related problems recognised. You see this with FD Signifier saying that false accusations don't happen... except to black men. So he can say men's issues are made up, but can still claim they are real for him on the basis of race. In other cases they may just feel a lot of pressure to conform to 'men are trash' narratives to keep on the good side of progressiv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/24 10:49 PM
1

This study is clearly not a random sample. They searched for published opinions and recorded/notable cases. These cases are not necessarily representative of all cases - it could easily be that these cases are more often recorded when the defense wins. It also only looks at litigation (in this case appeals). Given the cost of litigation it's quite possible that the fathers who actually commence litigation are the few who have strong cases which would distort the results. Plus a 'win' here is loo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 10:11 AM
–

It’s patriarchy that perpetuates the stigma that men can’t be victims It's is specifically feminist policy advocates and researchers who have argued for policies excluding male victims in my country and who use dodgy methods to try to minimise their existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 09:19 AM
3

This sub is mostly critical of feminism as an ideology while still being left wing on other issues and against conservatism on gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 02:57 AM
6

Men dont want to speak up" "Dont want to talk about their feeling, and worry about being seen as weak.." I hate this stereotype as it's not at all true for me except in situations where I know that being open and vulnerable actually will have negative effects on reputation etc. But it's not because I personally have any preoccupation with being tough. It's because of how society in general is. They always use this to in mens mental health issues on the men themselves for not wanting to be open i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/24 08:37 PM
2

Yeah true enough but I have seen it bleed out into real life in liberal areas. Mostly limited to Hollywood fan circles which is obviously low hanging fruit. But it also includes a lot of progressive youtubers like FD and personalities so people will see it and then associated the left with those people which is just so harmful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 10:48 PM
3

No, Feminist theory is a specific interpretation of the world. The underlying things it explains such as women being excluded from political power in many socieites are true - but that does not make feminist theory 'true'. Sociology and social sciences in general are not like physics. Their theories are not anywhere near as rigidly defined and are not carefully tested. Even quite carefully evidenced ideas in psychology have fallen apart recently due to publication bias etc so to just appeal to t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 10:39 PM
11

First please use paragraphs it's really hard to read your comments. But a partiarchal society will push men to never be vunerable and to be strong because that makes them the powerful cookie cutter man society wants and when men go against that they are punished to uphold that system This idea that they are punished to 'uphold a system' is just a nonsense interpretation made up by social theorists. It's not some kind of proven fact, and personally I think it's completely wrong. They push men to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 01:27 PM
8

I mean if someone, especially a woman, views men as undeserving of sympathy on the basis of gender and judges them for showing vulnerability how is that not misandry? Especially because a lot of the people pushing these things are people who claim to be progressive and are critical of patriarchy. And no it's not just or mostly 'patriarchy'. The domestic abuse policy in my country that denies male victims exist was written from an explicitly feminist viewpoint. The woman who drove my close friend…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 12:42 PM
8

General lack of recognition of male domestic abuse victims, masculine expectations coming from places other than just other men policing masculinity, disparities in court treatment, disparities in educational achievement, being seen in general as less deserving of support or sympathy etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 09:06 AM
14

Yeah absolutely. Even if I say I agree with like 90% of feminist causes (I.e I support reproductive rights, I recognise the amount of harassment women deal with etc) it's still not enough. If I say think that there are any gender specific problems facing men (outside of 'toxic masculinity' and other feminist-approved ideas) I get instantly attacked. There's no actual empathy. They aren't talking about these issues in good faith with a view to actually understanding the issues that impact differe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 12:53 AM
25

As previously noted FD defends Amber Heard. He is a smug echo chamber liberal and is basically ab example of the kind of thing that drives men away from the left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 12:45 AM
5

I mean on some level I agree that it's a good enough reason however it's not the only reason they cite. I dont think anyone here is against abortion rights. But lots of, probably most, pro choice people highlight the financial and life impacts of the child as much as they mention the bodily autonomy aspect. Yet will abandon those arguments when it comes.es to men. It's.reasonable to point out the hypocrisy. Especially the whole 'you chose to have sex' argument which is literally identical to wha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/24 03:57 PM
3

So do you think all arguments in favour of abortion which relate to the financial burden and pressures of unwanted children are wrong?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/24 02:38 PM
2

To a hammer everything looks like a nail.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/24 01:39 PM
2

Yep fuck this guy there's fucking publicly available audio of her berating and belittling Depp and mocking him for wanting the violence to stop.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/24 01:36 PM
3

FD defends Amber Heard. That's all I need to know about them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/24 01:32 PM
2

Hmm. The only case they mention is one of a man raping men. Not mention of recognition of female domestic violence perpetration. And it includes this line: >The plan will work with male victims at risk of committing sexual offences or causing harm Which makes it sound like they are basically focussing on trying to stop men abused as children being abusive. This doesn't break the current mold at all and does not mark meaningful progress in recognising the existence of male victimisation by women …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 09:14 AM
41

Yeah my friend was worried he was going to be charged with rape. Hi drunk girlfriend screamed at him for refusing and repeatedly climbed on him until he let her. She literally raped him and he felt bad about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/24 09:11 PM
44

My company's mens day event is a talk on male allyship. Very predictable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/24 02:58 AM
5

The social sciences are genuinely bad for this kind of thing. There's a huge amount of ideology involved in academic research on gender related issues and lots of academics are really bad at examining their own biases on this. There's a blatant lack of methodological rigour in a lot of work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/24 05:49 AM
1

Got it. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00232/full
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/24 01:48 PM
14

It's become the insult of choice because it carries the same connotation as 'virgin'. I.e an unattractive guy who can't get laid. The people using it want to give off the impression that they are progressive but still want to take advantage of conservative insults to masculinity and to keep 'traditional' masculine pressures on men. Even most of the actual misogynists who get called incels aren't actually incels. A lot of the are pick up artist types or married conservatives who have no trouble g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/24 07:53 PM
33

Honestly Kamala seems to have done a good job of avoiding this kind of rhetoric. Must suck for the dems who actually just want to get elected and pass good policy that they basically have to contend with potential male dem voters being alienated by an entire media industry built around generating clicks and engagement by posting content which shits on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 11:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter