TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Teacup50 Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by Teacup50 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

All of the especially virulently mean shit stirrers do.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 01:33 AM
13

A good developer? When? Where? I've never seen evidence of more than slinging some web design. I've been in this business a long time, and famous developers are famous for one or more of the following: Publishing papers that advance the state if the art Publishing code that advances the state of the art Lately (past 10 years): shit stirring All I've seen from Howarth is #3. Don't have to take my word for it -- see for yourself: https://github.com/nrrrdcore?tab=repositories ... Of course, that as…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:19 AM
5

It would be irrational in the extreme to cloud public policy decisions and scientific inquiry with subjective anecdotal "lived experiences", this runs counter to all evidence-based study and western ideals of rational inquiry. You may as we'll ask me to adopt religion solely on the "lived experience" of a tent revivalist. It's nonsensical, it holds up to no scrutiny, and it impedes any rational inquiry by co-opting any policy discourse in the same way that "intelligent design" attempts to co-opt…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:59 PM
2

I hope you see the irony involved in attacking MRA from a feminist position for their reactionary response to your attacks from a feminist position. Modern feminism, critical race theory, and assorted offshoots are virulently aggressive ("reactionary"). By comparison, I'd say MRA is actually quite a bit less so. We don't use rhetorical illiberal hammers to silence dissent.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 06:07 AM
11

You can't make public policy on the back of anecdotes. That's not "invalidating lived experiences" -- it's simply the very fundamental idea of rational inquiry upon which everything from judicial fairness to scientific advancement are built.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 06:02 AM
2

Wait, is "reactionary movement" a bad thing? Aren't most movements reactionary? I'm so confused. Are you doing that thing where you make up new vocabulary?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:54 AM
8

They're referencing statistics. You're referencing hypothetical "lived experiences". You lose.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter