TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tech_Romancer1 Archive

View 0 posts and 492 comments by Tech_Romancer1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 07:19 PM
2

They really don't like the idea of the vulnerable kid who has low confidence/self-esteem and learned to get over that and put themselves first...or at least further up the line. They don't even want this for the vast majority of men, either. They literally think most men are unattractive and subhuman, that they should just quietly go away or even die.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 07:18 PM
3

Within me lies two dragons. One quenches endlessly for battle and bloodshed. The other wishes only for peace and the infinite greed/destruction of humankind to end.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 07:16 PM
4

Women are assumed to be equal, even superior to men except in cases when it means they would be considered culpable or have to take responsibility. Female agency (or rather lack of it) is a joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 07:12 PM
2

Aba and Preach don't know how modern dating works They do know. They know, because 'modern' dating is no different than any other type. Which is bribing women to be with men. Aba and Preach obviously can't come out and say this. So like all red pill grifters they talk about 'game' and other nonsense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 07:11 PM
4

In a sense, he's right. For the wrong reasons. Dating and marriage is paying/bribing a woman to be with you, essentially, so he basically got the relationship across. That obviously wasn't his intention though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 07:04 PM
3

blackpill Unfortunately the studies and stats that many of these people cite are nether incorrect nor outdated. No idea what you are talking about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 07:02 PM
2

They never cared about men's issues, per se'. They cared about worker's issues. Its just that group has significant overlap with men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/26 04:18 PM
1

I've gotten the chance to talk with REAL feminists 'REAL' feminists are misandrists. The people you are referring to may identify as feminist but if they're not hating men or blaming the Patriarchy they aren't feminist. These are foundational to feminist doctrine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 06:22 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights13/05/26 05:33 PM
1

normalcy impossible Normalcy is relative. I also disagree women are at their 'best' being mothers. As a member of this sub you should be aware of the stats showing women to be the majority of child abusers. Women are not more suited to child care nor domestic matters. They were simply regulated to that position because they were entirely unable and unwilling to do the roles men did outside of that. I have no issue with women working outside of the home nor eschewing motherhood. Nor do I think th…
/r/MensRights13/05/26 05:05 PM
1

i intended to simply point it out because a shocking amount of guys have chronic "woman is wonderful" goggles. That's my point. A large factor in why men perceive women this way is because they want to appease women. Seeing women with any sort of flaws affects their perception of the world and they don't want to come to terms with that. And i do think this environment makes it impossible for women act on their best impulses and best nature, exactly because a big part of them is wired for exploit…
/r/MensRights13/05/26 04:05 PM
2

One of the partners idealizes the other, and that has deep implications in that they don't only "oversee" their partner's shortcomings, they don't even see them. Their very perception is hijacked. Basically, it's a stuck "in love" feeling. This seems problematic since it appears to be the 'default' setting for men in regards to women.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/26 03:58 PM
1

Three, some other special condition. Such as?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/26 02:00 AM
1

I think we've allowed bad-faith actors to co-opt that word, Orwellian style. Not interested in buying into their framing. I simply call them regressives, since that's what their identity politics ultimately lead them to.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 05:29 PM
1

Not nowadays. Always has been. Even in the formation of Christianity, women were its biggest supporters and for example the teachings of Paul were quietly ignored. It is thought that the largest factor leading to Constantine legitimizing Christianity was his mother. 'The Father' has always been a veil for the real worship of the woman. For example what did Mary do? Nothing, really. She's venerated, especially by South American Catholics for simply giving birth.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:56 PM
1

You do get it. He's rationalizing things because like most men he's desperate for women and thus eager to make excuses for their behavior.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:52 PM
1

Will do.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:51 PM
1

i think you assign them too much agency. This is the mistake men who want to look for excuses not to hold women accountable always go to. You choose to see women as lacking in agency because it strokes your ego, you want to fall back into the comfortable niche of being a provider and the illusion of being appreciated and loved. But the reality is that women always felt this way about men, it was merely necessity that held them to the roles in the past. Now that the untamed wilds have been conque…
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:16 PM
1

want women that know how to be, and act like women Western women doing the things that you don't like are acting like women. This is something you need to accept already.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 06:04 AM
2

women are under attack Women are not under attack. They are the modern day aristocracy. In many cases they are the ones doing the attacking. This idea that 'everyone' is being attacked 'equally' needs to end. Every single observation and evidence makes this clear.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 06:02 AM
1

I was literally talking about how I was anti feminist and disgusted with women who are openly man hating. That's fantastic but you do agree that's not what the thread was about.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:00 AM
1

Frankly it would easier to list subreddits where they would ban a woman for stating her opinion. Despite reddit being a majority male userbase, it is overwhelmingly favored towards females - a microcosm of society itself. Saying you are unable to find other subreddits to air your grievances as a woman is simply not believable.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 01:24 AM
1

No, but I will say one lesson men need to learn from women is to stand up for our spaces and what we want. They have no problem doing that, but men insist on making concessions all the while being spit on. That needs to end.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 08:40 PM
0

In other words you think men should accept their place as second class citizens and women should be allowed exclusivity, but not men.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 07:56 PM
1

To say that's impossible is exactly the reason such movements end up in such bad positions. Its impossible because of the dynamics between men and women. I don't believe the hypothetical situation you're speaking of is relevant in this case. Exactly how early feminism That's the point. Feminism was a hate movement from the start. It never 'lost its way'. There are no 'waves'.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 07:23 PM
0

I want men to finally have spaces that aren't invaded by women venting by about their problems. For once.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 07:21 PM
1

There's plenty of other subreddits that wouldn't ban you though...
/r/MensRights07/05/26 03:32 AM
5

Its colored drinking fountains and Jim Crow all over again, except sex based. Not even kidding.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:59 PM
1

I really don't want to end up with a male version of current feminism. That impossible because the former is a hate movement. Men's rights starts from a completely different foundation. And there's no such thing as 'one-sided' here. Men should have spaces to air their grievances or complain. Don't tone police here.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:58 PM
7

This begins with misandry. The profit motive is secondary.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:56 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:54 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VapfKwLMTs
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:49 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MP3npsRF4DY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itjdxvIig5g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VapfKwLMTs
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:49 PM
1

Its 'interesting' how people always attempt to abuse the naturalistic fallacy when defending women's behavior but never men's.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:36 PM
1

I'm curious why you thought this relevant to the men's rights subreddit? There was nowhere else for you to vent about this?
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:35 PM
1

I'm come to this conclusion. Besides sexual desire I realized that there's not really anything I'm interested in women for. They don't possess insight on topics nor interest in my hobbies. And sexual access is not worth it considering the troubles women can and do bring to a man's life. Especially now as I enter middle age and my libido isn't what it used to be.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:34 PM
1

Contrasting anecdote here. I've found that they ramp up the abuse and its much more likely I'm blamed for things, especially in the workplace. You get very little respect.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:30 PM
7

From what I've seen in studies, boys perform better academically and have significantly less behavioral issues than sex integrated schooling. Part of this seems to be attributed to male teachers imposing discipline while providing support. I believe society/women is against sex segregated schooling because they at least vaguely realize it benefits men. Women also are strongly opposed to being excluded from male spaces in general.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:27 PM
10

And why do these strong independent women have this expectation for random men to just help them. So it’s wrong for men to have expectations of women but women can have expectations of men. Men are worthless until you need a handout. They see men as below them. This is not a fair and equitable analysis. So men should know their place, provide them resources, work and perform while at the same time treating them as their betters. The conclusion is whatever advantages women at the moment and they …
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:20 PM
6

"follow the money." This is not about money. The profit motive can and will be sacrificed to appease women.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:15 PM
4

Its likely its not even that, most of women's 'experiences' are imagined or choosing to take offense at trivial and irrelevant matters. "This guy didn't treat me like nobility, toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:13 PM
5

Wait, how are those analogous to each other? Wouldn't complaining about a woman being fat be the same as...complaining about a man being fat?
/r/MensRights10/04/26 05:11 AM
8

I would imagine the idea of being the one driving their partner around makes them feel a certain way. In the same way a master might feel having to attend to a servant. Women feel entitled to men doing things for them and assume it as a matter of course. Many of them balk at having to do the same for men.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 04:55 AM
1

Use whatever definition you prefer. Its your question to answer because of the way we define political stances in the US (which is to say in many cases, poorly). I cannot answer your question unless you do so. So no, my definition isn't relevant here. At least not yet. You call a political ideology that demands the government The government is an extension of the culture and/or the people. If anything we are talking about authoritarians which can be either side of the spectrum. In anycase this h…
/r/MensRights08/04/26 09:49 AM
2

Theramin trees has excellent videos but ironically he would disagree with this post as he fully buys into the female victimhood narrative. As for cluster B...I'm not sure I fully buy into this comparison. All too often men and society engage in rationalizations as to why women couldn't possibly be angelic or suit their preconceived notions of them. Cluster B and other disorders are often cited as reasons to women exhibiting bad behavior, which are not even broached when men do the same things. F…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 07:07 PM
1

There's no need to project so hard. When you have evidence supporting your wild claims, you can come back and be taken seriously. You won't, though.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 10:51 PM
0

Except it isn't, and you wouldn't be able to find any evidence to support your position at all. I'll make something else clear for you too. Racism is an extension of misandry. This is why its never tolerated against women, regardless of race and only against men. Doesn't matter what their 'rules' or 'policies' say. They say whatever they want to justify their actions. Its about time you woke up and realized this. Your attempts at identity politics are tiresome. These people stick together when i…
/r/MensRights06/04/26 10:37 PM
0

They don't allow racism against white women. Just white men.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 09:26 PM
2

They also blatantly overlook subs like inceltears which is just an obsessive bullying sub. Note how all incel communities were vaporized, but not ones where they blatantly attack said men.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 08:42 PM
1

They hate them even when they commit to them. Remember Johnny Depp and Brad Pitt. Hugh Jackman's (older) wife even ended things with him. No man is safe. They accused Henry Cavill of misogyny and called him an incel for wanting a faithful adaptation of The Witcher lol.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 08:39 PM
0

They don't allow racism against white women. Also there's racist subreddits against brownies that are still on this platform, so not sure about that either.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 08:36 PM
1

Its not silly, and it has nothing to do with my perception. That's the truth and polls/stats bear this out. Women as a collective do not want actual parity with men, they do not want accountability, they do not want the same disadvantages, they do not want to concede their privileges in society. You can dismiss this all you like, I am merely telling the reality of it. Yes, liberals are right, yes moderates are effectively right in what is a right leaning country. And women in particular benefit …
/r/MensRights06/04/26 02:21 PM
1

How would you define leftist?
/r/MensRights06/04/26 02:18 PM
2

You're getting ahead of yourself. I simply answered your question. There's no obligation for me to have solutions. Would you prefer for there to be no conscription requirements for men, or where both men and women have to do it? I would prefer conscription to not exist of course, but I can see an argument for it. Currently, voting rights and other legal privileges are tied to men signing up for Selective Service. Thus women should be required to do the same. Women getting voting rights without t…
/r/MensRights06/04/26 03:02 AM
2

So you want to say that men don't look at women to fulfill any role? What are women obligated to do in society? Legally or socially? Nothing. What men are giving up their lives for women and what is 100% privilege? What sex is conscripted in war? What sex comprises the majority of fatalities on the job? What sex has a higher rate of suicide?
/r/MensRights06/04/26 01:33 AM
1

Paternity testing is also against women's interests, which is another factor in why it will never happen. France basically admits this lol.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:38 PM
2

No, its just Japan is as gynocentric as any other feminist cesspool on the planet. Some people like to argue the Japanese are misogynistic and put women down. Those people are gravely mistaken.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:32 PM
1

That is not the reason OJ got off. It was due to a technicality and (perhaps understandably) biased jury. The case is notable precisely because a black male getting away with murdering a white woman almost never happens.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:30 PM
1

The reason OJ got away was due to a technicality, bringing up his case is completely irrelevant. Also, OJ being a black male getting away with murdering a white woman is the ultimate 'man bites dog'. It is precisely because this sort of scenario does not happen in the legal system that is so infamous.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:29 PM
1

They don't even believe that. If they did, they would be advocating for his wife to not be receiving any plea deals and any information to be systemically squeezed out of her.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:25 PM
2

By that system's design, you as a man need to find someone who finds you attractive enough to throw the commandments away. They can never throw the commandments away though. At best its a bat behind the back situation. The legal and social systems allow women to destroy men at anytime.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:22 PM
2

It’s that both sides are trained to see each other as roles, not people. Its not 'both sides'. Its one sided, in that women don't see men as people and are hostile to us. Men literally give their lives up for women, so saying men are trained to view women as roles is simply false. Stop trying to equivocate this stuff. Women have 100% privilege here.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:21 PM
1

This is because feminists are tradcons. Think about it, they don't actually argue against anything tradcons do to benefit women, nor do tradcons themselves ever do anything but give women what they demand.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:19 PM
1

The legal system 'knows' this because society will not enforce responsibility upon women. Mostly because society is centered around catering to women. Sort of a chicken and egg situation. Just pointing out its not that the women lack the capability to provide, they just know they don't have to and society enables this so they usually don't.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:16 PM
1

Assuming they are ordered to pay at all.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:13 PM
1

It is a hate movement. This is why its tenets/dogma are overwhelmingly dishonest, they can be nothing but.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:12 PM
1

damaging leftist ideology Its not leftist. Feminists are 'leftist' in the US sense, which is to say they will parrot progressive speak when it benefits them. Feminism is overwhelmingly far right.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:11 PM
1

The movement women gained legal parity with men it was immediately inequality. As women have always had legal/social protections and privileges. They were never second/slave class.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:05 PM
1

According to PRRI, 31% of women identify as conservative, while 36% are moderate, and 29% are liberal. In practice this means 96% of women are conservative lol. No, I'm not joking, in practical terms what actually defines US liberals/neoliberals from conservatives? 'Moderates' just maintain the status quo so they also default to this. When it comes to gender dynamics and most social issues, women are almost always conservatives. They still want men to be the ones to perform the hard labor, earn …
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:00 PM
1

I am apathetic about abortion itself. The reason I am pro-choice/abortion is because the demographics that tend to argue for pro-life than also argue against welfare or spending on public services that would serve such children. The belief seems to be that since men are legally compelled for child support this is sufficient and they can walk away consistent in their morality. Advocating for abortion to be illegal while also gutting legislation that would benefit these children is the peak of irr…
/r/MensRights05/04/26 10:54 PM
2

Feminism didn't grant women those things, they had them long before that anyway. In terms of actions, feminism is objectively a hate and supremacy movement. We can define anything the way we like, but that doesn't change reality.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 10:46 PM
18

Women will date you if: You're physically attractive and/or tall, this will give you halo effect and have your introversion/shyness interpreted as 'being a lone wolf' or 'silent type' You're studying architecture, which is on average a fairly lucrative profession. Women will get into relationships with you based on your [potential] ability to be useful to them (usually finanically). Women will overlook things in men if they find they can exploit them for resources or labor. However, I shouldn't …
/r/MensRights05/04/26 09:42 PM
0

This response is very direct to your dismissal of the term misogyny. That's right. I dismiss misandrist shaming language. As any self-respecting man should. projecting You have no idea what projection means. though it has anything to do with the term misogyny. Indeed. Its irrelevant.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 03:51 AM
0

Mens and women can both be hostile towards each other. This is a deflection. Its a fact that both men and women are more positively inclined towards women and more hostile/apathetic towards men. There is no need to 'pretend', all data shows that men are treated worse in society and women possess more privileges.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 04:12 AM
1

Yet according to the actual stats and how the policy is enforced, in practice it ends up largely benefiting white women followed by minority women.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 03:05 AM
1

Such women would be extremely rare then, and not normal. Most women are hostile to men, many are apathetic. There are very few (I would argue almost none) who 'respect' men. If women respected men, they would create coalitions or political movements against misandry. However all the so-called normal women are silent. Which says it all.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 10:25 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:19 PM
1

Don't make this about race, you're falling for their bait and deflections. When legislation refers to 'minorities' they are not referring to minority men, but white women and other races of women. They hate brown and asian men no less than white men, especially if they don't toe the line.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:08 PM
1

According to early feminist authors, females must outnumber males at a ratio of 9:1. That's their definition of equality.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:06 PM
0

misogynist Misogynist is just a shaming term used for men who say things outside of the acceptable gynocentric bubble or otherwise stand up against female abuse and misandry. The actual definition isn't used and statistically barely exists as a concept. Women are hostile against men, whereas men generally view women extremely positively.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:04 PM
1

This framing is more evidence that society hates men and sees us as subhuman. This was literally the logic used to justify American blacks having less rights. Men are the new ******.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:02 PM
1

That is absolutely the biggest reason. Second is military propaganda. Worth mentioning too that women also have privileges even if they do join. Like avoiding the front lines/deployment and even if they are, have an out by getting pregnant. They are also fast tracked for promotions quicker compared to men.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:57 PM
1

emotional drivel Stop projecting. Everytime you present an argument and its answered with solid arguments backed with statistics you cope and try to reframe the issue. You are using motivated reasoning and sophistry because you absolutely will not accept the fact women are culpable for anything or privileged in society. You are not here for honest discussion or to change your views.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:55 PM
1

But to act like it is an epidemic It is, but to play devil's advocate and say it isn't, so what? Even a few men's lives being ruined is unacceptable. Yes, better to let guilty go free than punish an innocent. This is a foundation of a just system. The innocent can never gain that time and loss reputation back, ever. The guilty can always be met justice at a later date.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:52 PM
2

Couldn't it be argued that more women are going to university because expected career paths for women are typically in health and social care and education which all require a degree whereas expected careers for men involve trade which don't require a degree? No it couldn't be argued (in good faith) because it ignores the blatant quotas and favoritism that benefits women, from the education system to grading. Maybe educate men You mean like we should 'educate' women when they get raped, right? S…
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:49 PM
2

Because women became equal decades ago Women were more than equal long before that, as they have always had privileges that advantaged them over men.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:46 PM
2

she told us to write about how men can empower and help women i really wanted to say women I would be cheeky and write something like, 'men can empower women by helping them to achieve 50% parity in things like homelessness, workplace fatalities, suicide, hours worked, prison sentences, etc'.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:36 PM
1

women are pretty normal 'Normal' women are part of the problem though.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:34 PM
1

How does that help men though. Religious types are no less gynocentric than any other groups. As a matter of fact churches are practically owned by women.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:33 PM
3

The UK is arguably only somewhat less gynocentric than hellholes like Spain, Canada and India.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 08:45 PM
7

This is why getting dating advice from the average women is a bad idea, they're not really equipped to teach you much. They do teach you a lot of things. Like how someone with privilege and being coddled all their lives ends up with a frightening sense of entitlement. Or lack of empathy. Stunted perception of reality and how things work.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 08:42 PM
3

Thank you. Female hypoagency is a key term here.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 08:40 PM
1

That's good to hear. So far it seems only China, South Korean and some African countries have some resistance to gynocentrism/female privilege.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 05:32 AM
1

always lacks the female perspective. This is a strength, not a weakness. There is no shortage of places to go for the 'female perspective' (which is often a combination of gaslighting, mendacious and misandry). Putting that aside women make it clear men are not to speak on their issues (yet there is expectation men will support and implement their demands). Men can and should draw the same line in the sand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 04:06 AM
1

The promise is good but hard to implement. Not really, because the other side is a hate movement. There is no cooperation or reforming it because the entire point is misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 04:05 AM
2

AI is also pretty notorious for bias, in particular feminist/female bias. You have to ask very specific questions to get it to be more accurate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 04:03 AM
1

When the Coercive and Controlling La s were introduced in Scotland, they went absolutely Nuts, because they applied to everyone. It's expected by them that laws will be passed giving women preferential treatment Could you expand more on this? Are you saying Scotland refused to indulge in female privilege?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 03:54 AM
1

They haven't been brainwashed, you are denying women agency. Women have equal (more) rights to men and they still don't do it. You have to understand feminism isn't some separate thing, it comes from women. Think of it as women's desires politicized. They even say this ('The personal is political'). If women were brainwashed than why are these trends consistent before the 1800's, when feminism was first recognized as a movement? Why is it that women who don't identify as feminists don't push bac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 03:10 AM
1

What has she said?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 01:32 AM
1

Difficult to say which is the most misandrist, Spain, UK or Finland (which is controlled by a literal council of women).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 01:29 AM
1

Women are the class enemy of men, people need to recognize this. They will never reciprocate men's generosity, they see it as an entitlement and will go on to attack men afterwards. There is no time in history politically or socially that women have ever supported men's issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 01:27 AM
1

She's not so much antifeminist as she notices that open feminists bigotry threatens to chase away men from the plantation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 01:23 AM
1

The Patriarchy does not exist. Social apparatus that ostensibly is supposed to be for men's advantage yet blatantly advantages women at every turn is oxymoronic. It would be like saying the third Reich was a Jewish Cabal just because nazi rhetoric claimed they had all the power. intersectionality because rich people will always have more power to avoid punishment. Explain the Amber Herd vs Johnny Depp trial and multiple other cases of MeToo that just flat out ignored due process in favor of mob …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 01:21 AM
1

Ask yourself: Would these organizations be good? "KKK for Blacks Inc."? "Nazis for Jews Inc."? You cannot reform a hate movement, remember this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/26 07:00 PM
1

Not basically. Feminism is a hate movement. So naturally its premises are contradictory because the endgoal is to demonize men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/26 06:58 PM
2

Well this historical revisionism is standard procedure - feminism has thrived on the whole 'women were oppressed' trope. Where apparently women were dragged by their hair caveman style into marriage against their will and beaten like dogs for noncompliance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/26 06:56 PM
1

The MGTOW movement is now effectively addressing this issue , in my opinion. How so? BTW, while the US is very gynocentric I would say that we are still behind Spain and Britain in misandry. Canada too perhaps.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 03:46 AM
1

Not per se', but they're 'easier' to arrive at due to inherent bias of humans to be favorable towards women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 03:41 AM
1

No it isn't. You're not helping.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 03:23 AM
1

The left doesn’t want to admit that *some women really do like weird shit, because it’s ideologically inconvenient That is not a 'left' only problem at all. Even women themselves don't want to admit it, which is where this all starts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 02:07 AM
1

Hello brotha. Do tell.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 02:00 AM
2

There is no reforming a hate movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 01:56 AM
3

None of that is true. Women who say that are using the fact society is contradictory in regards to agency regarding them to excuse their behavior. They are lying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 01:53 AM
5

Toxic feminism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 01:50 AM
10

Don't even need to be a fetish. Many men will get with corpulent women simply due to lack of options/desperation. Its really a woman's market now, they know it too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 01:49 AM
1

Whenever they bring up that the majority of immigrants are "fighting-age men", the imagery is only powerful because it relies on bigotry towards men in general. Note how they garner sympathy and support for women by grouping them with children ('women and children').
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/26 12:33 AM
1

Misandry is socially acceptable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 08:53 PM
0

I honestly don't think women care about that, or men's welfare in general. At best its virtue signaling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 06:08 PM
0

I used to think that, but I would now be a fool to continue doing so. Take for example media, especially IPs with a majority male fanbase. See how they continuously destroy these franchises over and over again and the gaslighting in response. There was also the blatant admission by 'consultation firms' like Sweet Baby Inc. that have gone on record stating they intend to burn the video game industry to the ground. They attack these things because men derive pleasure from them, and they hate that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 11:41 PM
8

The patriarchy is a boogeyman like the Jewish Cabal, the Illuminati or Satan for Christians. It is an excuse for deflection and otherwise indefensible actions. Not a logical argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 10:43 PM
4

Its definitely selective obliviousness. Noticed this pattern long ago in commentators and prominent speakers that would utilize their well-honed arguments and logic to drive anti-religion points home like wooden stakes into vampires. Yet would always somehow fail to use that same critical thinking and research to recognize that feminism is a hate movement and society is deeply gynocentric.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 10:33 PM
4

I like to compare it to the Christian concept of original sin. This is why feminism is a religion. Its dogma is predicated on worship of women, and original sin is attributed to men. No matter how much men attempt to 'atone' it is never enough, and they will always be forever washed in sin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 09:58 PM
7

pseudofeminists No such thing. They are just feminists. Misandry is at the root of feminism and always has been.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 07:34 PM
1

And the more man-hating feminists really do not like if you point that out. This is redundant. All feminists and even most people that don't even use the label are misandrist. Simply because an individual isn't actively spewing man hate doesn't mean they aren't hostile towards men. Misandry is unconscious, legalized and institutionalized. It is the default in society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 06:52 PM
0

I agree. Society doesn't care about men. Actually, society is actively hostile in regards to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 06:49 PM
3

I always found it rather galling that BLM was headed primarily by a group of black women rather than men, the latter being the overwhelming majority of those affected. As a matter of fact, black female fatality rates are lower than even white men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 06:40 PM
4

He's been against woke before it was fashionable to be. No he wasn't. Lest you forget, Musk came from a country responsible for Apartheid and from the claims made against him via Tesla employees seems to have acquired all the relevant bigotry. He's not against 'woke' because he realizes its identity politics and distracts from class issues (which as a billionaire and bourgeoisie he is fully in support of), its because he's conservative, racist and sees it as fighting against the 'wrong' kind of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 05:46 PM
3

But i just about have every one of their go to excuses memorized “Yeah! By other men!” “It’s a result of the patriarchy!” This has always been touted as their gotcha but is actually quite illogical and self-own on their part. A 'patriarchy' that consistently goes out of its way to harm men is oxymoronic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 05:31 PM
7

I think it should be noted that this is a sub for men's issues, and that women have plenty of outlets and recognition for their problems. Why is it relevant to this sub what happens to women exactly? There are literally dozens, if not hundreds of other subs that focus on women. Stop hijacking men's issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 05:26 PM
23

This isn't oppression olympics. Sometimes groups are simply not equivalent in their struggles. I agree there is a fine line between recognizing this and identity politics (as a pejorative). However, that very distinction is why the subreddit exists. Saying men have much harsher circumstances compared to women or in many cases women not having any at all due to female privilege is simply factual. The term 'oppression olympics' in regards to men's issues is almost always an attempt to deflect or d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 05:23 PM
1

The thing with women is that regardless if they have adhd or simply horrid social skills, society will accommodate them. Women are Wonderful effect is extremely pervasive here; behaviors that men and boys would get chastised or mocked for are either ignored or celebrated in women. For example shyness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 08:30 PM
1

Yeah, I mean that's why I think we should ignore the feminists on reddit because they don't really represent most women. Where are the women in real life speaking up for men's issues or against misandry?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 07:46 PM
0

However, it's true that most women, and likely even most feminists IRL, would be sad about male suicide rates. I'll believe it when I see it. Majority of women are pretty callous or hostile to men's issues. Another big difference is that men on the internet tend to overestimate the prevalence of hypergamy and women's unrealistic standards. I've never met a woman IRL who talks about height the way they do on TikTok. Women's standards are pretty unfair IRL, but not that bad, and what they usually …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 07:42 PM
2

I don't think marriage can be decoupled from exploiting men in a legal sense. The arrangement is centered around men's labor; its essentially legal prostitution with some additional stipulations in the case of dissolution (which always disadvantage the man). When men ask women to marry them [legally], it is indistinct from bribing a woman into a long term arrangement. The reason this persists is because the vast majority of relationships unfortunately rely on men leveraging their assets/wealth/l…
/r/MensRights26/11/25 07:17 PM
12

“Bourgeois feminism"
/r/MensRights26/11/25 07:02 PM
0

Isn't that already the case though.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 07:00 PM
2

The difference is it's so normalized that they won't see anything wrong with it, even if you call it out and break it down for them. They'll get defensive, they'll call you insecure(i.e. not a real man), they'll say you hate women or they'll remind you that all their girlfriends agree with them, so that means you're in the wrong. None of this means anything. I must say its fascinating to see cognitive dissonance in real time though. This isn't really anything new but the reality is that Misandry…
/r/MensRights07/11/25 05:35 PM
1

one of my female friends posted a video on social media and her entire argument was "me and my friends all agree that men suck, therefor there's a problem with men and it is clearly that they suck", completely ignoring the reality that not only is that simply shared prejudices and misandry, but a way for them to collectively absolve themselves of any real accountability in the way they interact or judge men. Even the surety she had in her own position, this chauvinistic sense of superiority, ego…
/r/MensRights06/11/25 10:03 PM
1

male LWMA either Gaslighting and whataboutism. Men would be socially castrated for campaigning for our rights or being outspoken about misandry. While its true men can be our own worst enemies, ultimately it comes back to women. Men are fine with misandry because women support it. Men desire women's approval. 1 So ultimately any sweeping changes in society in this regard have to start with women. There is a reason most political and social manipulators start with gaining female support. was that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 02:17 AM
1

I've been trying to get a more diverse handle on gender issues for three days straight Three whole days. Well, we all start somewhere. Good luck on your journey and continue lurking around these subreddits.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 02:02 AM
1

I really have a low tolerance for this brand of sophistry and projection that feminists exhibit in their brand of 'argumentation'. I asked you for examples of men actually enacting anti-female legislation and you just provide random strawmen. You make no-true scottsman claims with no examples of women as a collective fighting for men's rights. You can't demonstrate any of these things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 01:10 AM
1

There are factions calling themselves feminists that are hateful Even if this weren't a no true scottsman, these 'shocked and confused' women remain silent and apathetic on the political and social stage. There are no protests, no movements, no social shaming. Nothing. To prove your claim There's nothing to 'prove'. Society is hostile to men both legally and socially and there's an abundance of threads on this very sub if you're legitimately interested in learning about that. You're not, this is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 12:58 AM
1

Where is this coming from? The only countries I can think of are worse are Spain, India, Australia and perhaps Canada.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 07:22 PM
1

This has nothing to do with left/right, stop missing the forest for the trees. Its a systematic problem with society regardless of politics or economics. I just can’t wait till the pendulum swings back to being extremely conservative again. So you're waiting for things to stay exactly the same, if not worse then.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 07:19 PM
1

I think women also have an obligation to call out misandry. I do it whenever I see it. Your ancedotes are irrelevant. Women in general stay silent in regards to misandry or even perpetuate it. No, I don't care about 'misogyny' in society so long as misandry is de-facto legal and socially acceptable. Men are under no obligation to 'look out' for women. This seems very "us vs them". That's how women, at least feminists see it. They are actively hostile to men. Also, how do you judge when you shoul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 05:01 PM
1

You're... literally doing the "You aren't so we won't!" revenge thing in this thread. This doesn't mean anything. If you have an actual point to raise, do so. Provide actual evidence of male advocates passing legislation that disadvantages females. You literally just used a supposed past deed, as a reason to allow misogyny You're wasting my time. Post evidence of men's rights advocates or indeed any concentrated effort at all in western society to strip women of their rights or reduce them to se…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 04:56 PM
5

Some times, I genuinely wonder if women are so reluctant to approach men because they believe men will treat them as poorly as the way they treat men who approach them. It could very well be projection, which is extremely common with women. More likely due to women's risk aversion and entitlement though. They realize at least on some level that taking initiative is difficult, takes effort and comes with risk. That alone makes them stray clear of it. Plus being passive allows them plausible denia…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/25 07:12 PM
1

I've heard people say that American democrats are right-wing Not right wing. But the farthest they would go is center left, and even those people are in short supply (ie. Bernie). They're not a party actually for workers any longer and only support things like LGBT so far as it does not interfere with capitalist interests. "Neoliberal", "regressive", etc. are much better at describing politics than just "left" and "right". In the US at least. I would say Left and Right are substantial terms in E…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/25 06:00 PM
1

A lot of countries have a "two-party system", actually. It's crazy. Sure, but this is irrelevant to the point I'm making specifically about the US, where both parties ultimately serve the interests of capital. The definitions of left and right are not exactly clear. Perhaps, they are terms that can change depending on context. However regardless of if one defines left/right dichomony by economics, European standards or relative to the US paradigm, Republicans would still be firmly classified as …
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/25 05:48 PM
0

I do have to wonder how much that has to do with how the two party system operates in the US (assuming you are American). Here in the US, the 'left' is relative and the democrats are ultimately little different from Republicans in the end. So I get why people buy into horseshoe theory or chose to identify as centrists, but the democrats only 'left wing' but not really 'left'. Certainly not economically on most issues.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/25 05:21 PM
21

feminists be supporting gender roles just as much as traditionalists now Not 'now'. Always. Get this notion that feminists are 'left' or progressive out your heads. Think about feminism, it has always demanded and nagged men into taking responsibility and doing things for them. It is just traditionalism with even more privileges and more open misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/25 05:13 PM
1

A lot of the anti-Trump rhetoric is just misandry. In most cases I would agree with this, but in Trump's case he really is just an individual with almost no redeeming traits. Sure, the attacks against him wouldn't be the same if Trump were a woman but this is besides the point.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 08:30 PM
5

By doing that, we're essentially using the feminist playbook. No. We're not. This is not an attack on anyone nor about hate. That's the feminist playbook. We have to write our own playbook. We already have. Unlike feminists we actually have the data and truth on our side. We don't seek to make anyone second class citizens or take revenge for past deeds, real or imagined. And we have no obligation to speak up for other people who have made it clear they not only won't reciprocate, but have contem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 06:10 PM
1

while simultaneously ignoring men's issues. That would actually be an improvement. Feminists are actively hostile and stonewall men's issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 12:30 AM
2

I'm somewhat curious as to why this individual would think males are first class citizens, but if experience has taught me anything it usually goes back to the apex fallacy (there are lots of male politicians, CEOs and the president thus = men are on easy mode).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 12:24 AM
1

Letting feminists handle men's issues is like letting Asians handle issues in the black community. Inaccurate. I could actually see some positives from that. Better comparison would be, 'letting the KKK handle issues in the black community', or 'letting nazis handle issues in the jewish community'. Feminists are misandrists, there is no doubt about this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 12:18 AM
3

uppercase-I Incels This word means nothing at this point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 09:54 PM
1

So basically Cakism Feminism. Its just feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 07:37 PM
20

Except not really. Women hear and perpetuate misandry extremely casually and make no attempt to correct their sisters. They enact anti-male legislation and make generalizations/projections on a comical scale. Men have no obligation to speak up anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 07:34 PM
4

The occupant of the shared home is drastically more likely to be rewarded the home during a divorce. The same is true of custody of any shared children; because having a living space is one of the required steps toward building a stable life for a child. IIRC divorce lawyers even explicitly advise this to women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 07:24 PM
1

No, you don't know. People did read your comment, but sure go ahead and strawman everyone as malcontents so as to serve your ego.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 01:20 AM
1

animosity between men and women This exists regardless of whether there is 'openness' to sex or not though. gradual degradation of morals within a society. As to opposed to the past which had great morals. What are you even talking about?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 01:12 AM
1

Excuse me for my ignorance and I intend no insensitivity...I was under the impression that sex as a gay man was a lot easier and less stressful than us heterosexuals. The approach and dynamics seemed a lot less complex and exploitative, as opposed to when men have to essentially bribe women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 01:02 AM
2

Liberals in the US are just publicly embarrassed conservatives when it comes down to it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 09:58 PM
1

And you see no movement of men denying the right of women in existence? No, none. How can you make this argument when men still make up the vast majority of fatalities, both violence and work related? Die earlier? While the retirement age is paradoxically lower for women? And countless other things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 09:54 PM
1

The vast majority of the world's richest women did not earn their wealth or even extract it from people, they simply inherited it from husbands or fathers. There's only a few exceptions like...Oprah?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 09:52 PM
1

But to reframe the problem as women as a whole being the enemy is Innacurate and then that’s how you get the same mentality as feminists but reversed. When have women ever been allies to men as a collective and/or not actively hostile to their interests?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 09:47 PM
4

Women were not treated as property, and the common man was not privileged in regards to women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 09:20 PM
2

Feminism is a right-wing movement, but its false advertisement of equality and oppression allow it to co-op left-wing and centrist minded people/movements. Men actually on the left should be as critical of it as any other class hostile to them. I myself hold a fringe opinion in that I consider women as a class overall opposed to [working] male interests and think they should be considered a subset of the petty bourgeoisie. To anyone that finds this extreme I ask that they ask themselves one ques…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 09:17 PM
7

even though they are not as far right as they could be Early feminists advocated eugenics against black people, especially black men. There was always significant overlap with the female KKK, which was pretty much predicated on getting ethnic men (including Irish men) lynched for laughs. Not sure if that's 'far right' enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 09:11 PM
8

One suspects this is one reason why male homosexuality was and still is looked upon so harshly, while lesbians have always been given a pass.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 09:07 PM
1

Even going by that definition, the west is not a patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 04:39 PM
5

Patriarchy benefits fathers and to a lesser extent men socially. It has nothing to do with who is in charge, that's just the apex fallacy. If women occupied majority positions of power and used their influence to advantage men it would be a patriarchy. Men just in leaderships positions is insufficient. That's just an attempt to stretch the term and it makes it meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:30 AM
11

If the Patriarchy negatively affects men in such large and obvious ways its oxymoronic. It would be like saying Feminism hurts women too while benefiting men to such an absurd extent and only the top and wealthly women are the real beneficiaries. If a Patriarchy were to exist it clearly would not have things like The Tender Years Doctrine, allowing women to get default custody, child support, alimony, tolerating men being 90% of workplace fatalities, lenient prison sentences for women for commit…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 11:53 PM
3

I’m not a feminist man. I hate feminism. Lies.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 07:11 AM
1

Still an indictment on the human race that anyone is defending this behavior whatsoever.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 07:06 AM
1

"Internalized misogyny"
/r/MensRights24/08/25 07:05 AM
9

What's even worse is that it seems the shorter the woman, the more stringent her height requirements. So you have 5'2'' women wanting 6'5'' men. As if they are trying to overcompensate for their own short height. That's not to say tall women aren't picky but short women seem to obsess over it to the extreme.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 06:31 AM
2

Should guys make a ticket system spread sheet to track the "man-hours" spent on fixing, installing, and designing solutions to every problem they make? Ask for upfront purchases of time? Charge double for hours not prepurchased? Divorce over "unpaid labor"? Why not? Women basically think of relationships in mercenary terms. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Of course not, that defeats the purpose of romance. Romance is a concept intended to mask the underlying transactional natur…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 05:45 PM
4

Many would say he didn't considering the prequels but that is a different discussion.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 03:13 PM
3

I believe I just stated one in my last post... In short women don't want the risk that comes with being male, just the advantages.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 03:12 PM
1

I'm positive you have no idea what fascism even is.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:10 PM
1

In your mind, the only reason why it was oppressive for Black men to not be able to vote was because they were sometimes conscripted? That is not what I wrote. Read my post again. Voting is a privilege. I do not believe citizenship alone is sufficient for having a say in electing representatives or changing legislation.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:47 PM
5

Emotional labor isn't even supposed to be used in that capacity. It was a term developed to describe how blue collar workers have to tolerate certain behaviors from customers and management, particularly in service professions. Women appropriated it for their own use and it doesn't even make sense.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:33 PM
2

IIRC this is similarly represented in the differences of treatment between female and male strippers. Female strippers are almost never harassed and the no-touching rule is respected by male costumers but male strippers are groped and propositioned all the time. I hear bachelorette parties are particularly rife with sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:30 PM
7

No, they only decided to accept them when they were allowed to retain their privileges and not give up anything in return. Case in point selective service. Women didn't want the vote if it meant having to put their lives on the line. They got it for free so they have no issue.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:28 PM
2

I am speaking from a U.S. context: Not giving women the right to vote was oppressive. Just like Black people not having the right to vote was oppressive. Just like allowing only land-owners to vote was oppressive. Justifying these oppressive conditions can feel particularly unsafe to groups whose rights are currently being targeted by the current regime in power. The comparison to black people does not work; women, especially white women were never oppressed. Certainly not to the extent of black…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:26 PM
3

By not registering for selective service you forfeit your right to vote? The underlying logic behind selective service is if you are not willing to put down your life for the country or at least contribute to it in its time of need then you have no business having any say in how its run.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:21 PM
2

As a US male, I think that feminism has permeated the social consciousness to such an extent that it does not matter whether any woman explicitly identifies as one or not. For as much as some claim 'modern feminism' has gone a bit too far or there are 'extremists' there is no actual pushback politically or socially against these so-called extremists. Falsehoods like wage gap, 'emotional labor' and housework are still talking points despite being debunked numerous times. Males are blatantly secon…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:16 PM
10

To be fair Star Wars Christmas Special is a thing and that was long before Disney got their mitts on the franchise.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:05 PM
8

Speaking of the WNBA it is subsidized by the NBA similar to how female tennis players are in Wimbleton. Propped up by men/male players despite (or rather because) not being profitable.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:05 PM
0

This is obviously false (a cursory walk outside will be enough to disprove it) but comes with a hint of truth - stats prove that women find the overwhelming majority of men unattractive.
/r/ExRedPill22/07/25 01:15 PM
1

The definition of feminism (or "the theoretical basis of the feminist ideology itself") is "Feminism is a range of socio-political movements and ideologies that aim to define and establish the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes." Who cares about the definition when the actions and statements don't follow through. You are saying we should define a party through definitions and not their track record, which is absurd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 09:49 PM
1

I mean, that itself is word games. 'Modern leftists' are purposely defined that way due to dishonest social engineering of the overton window. 'Modern leftists' are not left at all, but it behooves certain groups of people to demonize the left so they remain in power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 06:33 PM
1

They 'define' equality differently the same way they do Patriarchy. Equality under feminism is whatever benefits women at the time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 06:06 PM
2

They ban you regardless of how you act. If you're not worshiping women you get banned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 06:05 PM
2

Feminism’s good faith egalitarian goals Except those don't exist in the first place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 05:46 PM
3

Yes, I have noticed this as well even being heterosexual. This is partly why women intrude on gay bars so much.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 05:43 PM
1

Unfortunately the UK has other things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 12:55 PM
1

Feminism is basically just traditionalism rebranded. Its essentially, 'we still want female privileges and for men to take all the risks, along with previous responsibilities. But with more legal goodies and partisan treatment to boot". It is a hate movement, and it is unashamedly hierarchical. Where women are at the top, cute animals are next and men (and sometimes even children) are third class. It is definitely on the right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 12:47 PM
2

Feminism is basically just traditionalism rebranded. Its essentially, 'we still want female privileges and for men to take all the risks, along with previous responsibilities. But with more legal goodies and partisan treatment to boot". It is a hate movement, and it is unashamedly hierarchical. Where women are at the top, cute animals are next and men (and sometimes even children) are third class. It is definitely on the right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 12:45 PM
3

(And, as an addenum, the worst bullying I have suffered in my school and work life has been from women. Lots to unpack there, and I am not necessarily playing into the Victimology Establishment, but I was apparently an easy victim for them to scapegoat even though I was never accepted by, in fact, I was rejected by, and never consciously supported their "patriarchal bugaboo" construct.) Women will also bully and attempt to cause trouble for men at work they find 'creepy' (read: sexually unattrac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 12:41 PM
1

Not just that. Their complete apathy or misandry means male lives are utterly disposable to them. They would be by far the most psychotic when it comes to ordering armies of men to become cannon fodder.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 12:32 PM
1

I really don't like transactional framings like this. It doesn't matter whether we like it or not though. Society, and especially women see it this way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 12:25 PM
1

I find it interesting how in Islam married women can hold jobs but unlike the husband are not all obligated to share their earnings with the family.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 12:23 PM
1

African American communities during the Civil Rights movement, for example It is no different in modern day. More often than not it is the women dragging the rest of the family to church and bible study. The rest of the family would rather enjoy their Sundays off. Churches in general also cater to women regardless of ethnic group because in the end religion is a business and it is the females that fill the collection plates. This is why you will never hear scripture quoting Paul nor shaming of s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 12:19 PM
1

There was a term for it, commonly used by Europeans to describe those in entertainment. Basically, they are usually not disciplined in economics so they tend to quickly burn through money after having come into it so quickly. This is in contrast to upper middle class people, those born into wealth or other lucrative fields that have delayed payoffs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 12:12 PM
1

protected class of people This protection seems to be surface level and more directed at minority women. It certainly does not extend to the male counterparts.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 04:27 AM
3

If you aren't above her in socioeconomic status then half of what drives her sexuality is missing. This doesn't explain why women like blue-collar criminals, violent murderers/psychopaths, thugs, gang members, etc. I don't know if women are so much sexually attracted to wealth as they are just viewing such men are suitable for exploitation. People view women as completely illogical or driven by instinct but this is not true. They are in fact quite pragmatic and mercenary when selecting for men i…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 11:30 PM
3

They actually do, but the husband duties have been outsourced into jobs Its not just that. Women are subsidized by society and thus men as a collective rather than just on an individual level. This manner of welfare and interdependence fools women into thinking they are in fact, independent.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 11:26 PM
2

I agree with a great deal of many things you say on your youtube channel, but to claim that women don't at all take looks or physical features into attraction is simply untrue. In fact, in many respects women treasure looks a lot more than men since they are so picky.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 11:19 PM
1

In my opinion, a lot of it has to do with the fact that most women find attraction in people they like and trust. Yeah, exactly. Like those gang members, thugs, criminals and psychopaths that women commonly get off on. All those murderers in prison that get fanmail from women. Such trustworthy men.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 11:18 PM
1

Well, if nobody has given you honest feedback up to point, why do you think that is? You seem to be approaching this from an individual perspective. Let me clarify: I am not referring to myself but a trend in general. So you attempting to give me advice or shaming language is completely pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:32 PM
3

No self-reflection and feeling entitled. Sounds more like a projection by women tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:29 PM
2

they believe that they have discovered some hidden reality which other people don’t see. I don't think they believe that. Rather that they say things about reality that other people would not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:28 PM
1

Yeah but nobody is going to do that because you would probably start sobbing and they don’t want to deal with that. Are you a woman? This sounds like projection. Men as a group are in fact, quite used to hardship. Rejection is no exception. Besides the narrative is that women should not concern themselves with men's feelings (and indeed they don't) so whether someone starts crying or not is irrelevant to all this. Figure it out on your own. That’s life. I've already 'figured it out'. That's not …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:25 PM
2

None of that actually argues against the fact women are well known for virtue signaling. But they’re not there to teach you how to be a man. But they’re not there to teach you how to be a man. They are just surviving the same as everyone else. It’s your job to figure out life and decide who you want to be. No-one is asking them to? The complaint is about transparency. None of the rest of this has anything to do the discussion. Where are men expecting women to 'figure out their life and who they …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:23 PM
3

It doesn’t really mean anything, they just genuinely want you to be happy. Women don't care about men's happiness; they possess no empathy in that regard. What concerns women when they say these things are their social image. They don't want to be perceived in a negative light. It has nothing to do with the man's feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 05:55 PM
1

Would it really have been better for you as a young man if women were like ‘Ew you’re gross, I wouldn’t touch you with a ten foot pole’? Yes, it would. Being blunt and honest about this stuff would be better in the long run. Instead of this duplicitous nonsense and gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 05:54 PM
1

First off, my initial post was a joke. There are feminine women who do not have neotenous features but are still considered feminine because they wear dresses , have long hair , etc . This is the difference between 'cute' (more neotenous) and 'striking' (more rigid features but still obviously feminine and attractive). Most men cannot pull either of these off. There are also ethnic and phenotypes that lean even more heavily into genetics that emphasize muscularity or impossible to 'pass' for fem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 01:52 AM
1

Ask biology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/25 07:04 AM
1

Can't 'be fem'. That's not how any of this works.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/25 06:25 AM
5

That seems indistinguishable from hate to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/25 05:31 PM
1

I don't have the neotenous features nor the legs to rock the femboy look tho
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/25 05:27 PM
4

The remaining 10% is misandry.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 03:30 AM
56

Except if the sexes were reversed the male guard would still receive a harsher sentence, even if it was his first offense.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 05:29 PM
1

Black male gets lynched in 1950s, black community is outraged and disgusted The reason you view it that way is because you don't hold KKK values.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:00 PM
1

I agree, most men think this way. My point was that this contradiction could have been raised when they argued the male-only bar was exclusionary. At the very least it would have pointed out the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 10:57 AM
1

Apparently some said it was exclusionary which is illegal. If that was the argument for legal action than by that logic the women exclusive bar should be shut down too.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 08:08 AM
1

The Citadel?
/r/MensRights09/05/25 06:02 AM
1

How did the dynamics of the club change once women were allowed entrance?
/r/MensRights09/05/25 04:21 AM
1

That almost seems as if done on purpose.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 03:56 AM
1

Now of course that's not allowed either. I remember much heated conversation about it at the time because the was a female only club across the road and not a single man had a problem with that or forced themselves in there on sexism grounds. Do you remember the specifics of the discussion? How did they justify invading men's space in this instance?
/r/MensRights09/05/25 03:56 AM
2

He unironically does the thing where he acts like he's smarter than other people because he talks faster and more aggressively than them, and uses that to bully his way through debates. Gish gallop.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/25 10:50 PM
1

She must be living in a different reality. Not once have I witnessed such a case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/25 06:59 PM
1

Its funny how they never hesitate to use victim blaming themselves, despite accusing men of it all the time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/25 06:56 PM
5

The data it produced revealed rather unflattering statistics concerning women. Such as?
/r/MensRights30/04/25 03:21 AM
1

I think educating women in feminism is redundant - feminism itself is really just feminine imperative interlaced with politics. Its men that they seek to 'educate'.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 11:01 PM
1

Incels are rapidly becoming society’s scapegoats. Not 'rapidly'. Lowly regarded men have always been society's punching bags. And because they are men, they are paradoxically seen as privileged so its considered punching up.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 10:29 PM
1

Its hypocritical as well. Why doesn't this same standard of eugenics apply to women who fraud their looks with makeup discount them from the gene pool? At least with men that exercise and become more fit they are showing their physical potential and positive traits like dedication and discipline. Whereas women that have no concept of self improvement are able to breed up due to hypergamy and the principle of least interest. If the implication is that people are avoiding people of 'poor breeding …
/r/MensRights29/04/25 10:21 PM
0

Basically, capitalism is an entrenchment of natural ideas of resource possession, acquisition, and exchange. No it isn't, because capitalism is actually the acquisition and accrual of capital. Many times this overlaps with profit/income but also many times does not. And this distinction is very important. In anycase, its not 'natural'. It is an economic system that could only exist in a interdependent, large scale industrial society. And even then is not self-sustaining.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 05:02 PM
2

They're not female supremacists. Its both. They believe that women are inherently more moral than men, and they also feel entitled to the privileges that women receive for being women from men. Or at the very least don't feel the need to speak up against double standards. The more 'moderate' women who aren't explicitly into ideology aren't overly misandrist, but still stand behind those that are or at the very least are silent. They still feel no need to get rid of biased legislation or laws aga…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 12:55 AM
2

https://greenpill.net/marriage-as-economic-slavery/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/25 08:36 AM
2

Well he doesn't appear to be updating his website, the 'green pill' either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/25 08:29 PM
1

What happened to him?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 09:31 AM
1

I've no idea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 01:28 AM
1

I'm honestly not sure. Perhaps the entire paradigm has to collapse before any meaningful change can begin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/25 08:46 PM
1

Projection.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/25 07:57 PM
1

I'd say they have 'won' in every metric that's relevant. As for the body positivity movement, my guess is that fat women are tolerated due to men having less options in general. IIRC several studies state that fat women actually have more sexual partners than average. The US has a high population of overweight/fat women too, so another issue is simple ubiquity at this point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 07:13 PM
1

How is this misinformation?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 07:09 PM
5

Depending on the state, this may or may not be legal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 07:05 PM
1

Well, it is a fact that humans have evolved protecting women and as a result they have developed less risk-seeking behavior. This does come down to women possessing wombs and gestating young. So losing females in smaller populations is a larger setback to reproduction than males.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 07:04 PM
1

I never said anything about it being biological. Did you intend to respond to someone else?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 06:50 PM
1

But if they defy conventional beauty standards Then why is the 'body positivity' movement permitted?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 06:39 PM
1

Technically bachelor tax already exists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 06:36 PM
1

Due to the principle of least interest, men have less options. More desperate and less picky. Men are also the ones that almost always have to take the initiative and risk open rejection. Women can and will be passive, because they can; there is no downside to this due to the factors above. Basically its like being the employer that's in high demand as opposed to the worker that's desperate for employment. Female advantage in sexuality is almost a perfect analog for capitalism and the common per…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 06:33 PM
2

That's why women think you're gay if you're not into them. I don't believe they legitimately think that. Its more a rationalization to cope with rejection, which they handle poorly. Its purely to salvage their ego.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 06:29 PM
2

'Decent' is too conservative a word to describe the amount of misandry present in modern academia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 06:27 PM
1

Our lead DEI officer was the one who first said They can say anything they please. When it comes to them building a portfolio of you, an accurate summary of events will be irrelevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 05:59 PM
1

What's worth it, exactly? At best nothing will change. At worst, you will be identified as problematic and potentially lose your job.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 05:57 PM
0

Incel was simply an acronym to describe something that has always existed. So it doesn't matter that a woman popularized it or not.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 04:20 PM
1

Well, its technically true. Feminism didn't create the circumstances that lead to male celibacy (much of it is gynocentrism and related to biology). Feminism does however greatly compound these factors.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 04:19 PM
17

Yup
/r/MensRights02/01/25 08:01 AM
36

I would love to see a study that adds this all up. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2375926 1
/r/MensRights02/01/25 08:00 AM
41

Women already controlled 80% of spending well before this. As I have noted, even if men make the wealth, what matters is who actually gets to spend it.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 07:57 AM
2

Most female singers/composers do. Beyonce' was another. Frankly too many to list.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 07:11 AM
1

Add in Christianity's playbook with original sin too.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:58 AM
0

🤡
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:54 AM
11

I compare how human perception and biases work, which, in this situation, is the same for men and women. No it isn't. Its a well established fact that both women and men are positively inclined towards women as group. The opposite is not true.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 08:03 PM
4

At the end of the day, trust your instincts. Many men's instinct is to stick it in. That's the problem.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:59 PM
6

Women, even these repulsive idealoges, have no issue getting sex though. Too many desperate men.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:58 PM
1

It suggests women are only acted upon and have no agency like children do. This is female hypoagency, which is then turned on its head when its convenient for women to appear strong and independent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/24 07:48 PM
2

I mean, is that even incorrect though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/24 07:30 PM
1

You be real. Making a false equivalence simply makes you look bad. No woman was ever under anything like South African apartheid, nor was any feminist movement under duress even approaching the Civil Rights movement. This is pretty disgusting, honestly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/24 12:46 AM
-1

Though Farrell has a bit too much of the "a man's primary motivation in life is sex" thing going on. Its a bit difficult to deny this point given most men's apparent inability to say no to women in general and their enforcement of gynocentrism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/24 12:00 AM
2

*3rd wave feminism, surely? No, it was no different from the start. Always a misandrist movement. If anything the later waves are less extremist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 07:14 PM
1

"Conservative" means "tending or inclined to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions". Feminism is all about tearing these down. Feminism is doing what women have always done, which is complain and make demands of men, of which the latter capitulates. Women simply have more privileges than they did before. Which is why conservatives have never really opposed feminism.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 10:14 PM
4

This is one reason among many why its so surreal whenever someone claims women are so downtrodden and victimized, especially in the western world. These are literally first world problems, a privilege available only to what could be called aristocratic. Anyone that claims women in the west have problems and men need to do better by them is simply evil. By all metrics women have all the advantages one could want in the modern world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 07:59 PM
5

Like, tons of progressives are male, how do they fail this badly. In their eyes, they aren't failing. They are doing what they have always done, because they have been taught by past experience it has always worked. And what has always worked is that women can essentially browbeat, shame and demand the world of men and men with roll over and capitulate pretty much every time. So its no surprise they are incredibly entitled and offer nothing in return. Again, its always been that way so why would…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 07:52 PM
3

I see it as the other way around. The favorable treatment given to women due to a combination of social programming and evolved behavior results in the inequality.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:50 AM
1

She has become a tradcon I was not aware of this, but I did know she had gotten either remarried or into another relationship where the man was more or less paying expenses. So this is unsurprising.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:48 AM
2

Modern feminism has nothing to do with egalitarianism. There is no 'modern' distinction. It was this way from its very inception. Also European feminism has rapidly going homophobic and transphobic. That's because despite its parasitic latching to the [modern] left, feminism is and always will be ultimately a conservative movement. At its core its women complaining and demanding things, with men acquiescing.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:53 AM
1

Forgive me for being apathetic regarding women's issues with their own misandrist ideology.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:51 AM
2

It isn't money that is the root of all evil. It's incongruency. The root of that is gynocentrism. How society changes away from this is I am unsure of.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:49 AM
1

I could have sworn there was one, and a website as well. At the very least, wasn't there r/ pussypass and r/ pussypassdenied?
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:46 AM
1

The point is, why is one able to abuse it but not the other? It should be nether or both.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:44 AM
1

You're not entitled Again, this is simply projection. The fact you think anyone has been provided an 'opportunity' to prove anything is comical. When I say "talking out of your arse", that's obviously not offered as a self-contained argument. Its not 'offered' as anything, it holds no substance at all. No-one is on trial here nor seeks your acknowledgement. I simply was curious to see if you actually had some point worth making or if you were indeed engaged in intellectual-masturbation. Its clea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/24 07:07 PM
1

If you actually have a counter argument or valid point to raise than make it. Otherwise you're projecting. You're the only one here that hasn't shared anything of substance. 'You don't know anything' isn't an argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/24 06:04 PM
1

My disagreement is more with terminology. Colloquially I understand why people use 'free will', they're basically trying to advocate for a certain amount of agency and ultimately culpability for one's circumstances. However, the term has significant overlap and so I'm forced to critique it as its taken literally. If the most ardent advocate will agree that we are born a priori with factors outside of our control than the term 'free will' simply doesn't make sense. From the outset, there is nothi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/24 01:34 AM
0

There should be a women's rights movement Should there? What rights are women lacking that men possess?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 10:15 PM
1

Well, patriarchy is basically a nebulous concept feminists can re-define at will. Saying its in reverse doesn't really make sense. Just call it what it is, authoritarian censorship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 10:15 PM
1

'Dats not real feminism'!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 10:13 PM
1

Except any cursory look at the history of feminism makes it clear the movement was always misandrist, classist, racist and never had noble intentions. There's actual feminism which hasn't really changed since its inception and then there's dictionary-performative feminism which is regurgitated by the masses. This sort of 'Schrödinger's feminism' is whatever the so-called moderates want it to be and provides a shield for the actual movers and shakers (who are labeled 'extremists').
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 10:12 PM
1

there is a spectrum between those viewpoints in which free will is believed to exist, but is subject to limitations. If 'free will' is subject to limitations, then wouldn't that by definition make it not...free? Seems oxymoronic, even paradoxical. From my view free will seems farcical and impossible for a multitude of reasons, but for the sake of brevity consider one's birth. Did you have agency over when you were born? How? To whom? Where? So from the very start of human existence the concept o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 10:03 PM
1

Its kind of a 'yes, but no' deal. Feminism takes the most basic and trite underpinning of marxism in that of class warfare and perverts it into a crude (and even incoherent) justification for sex persecution complex. Ironically, given the countless privileges women enjoy compounded with their negative tax contribution and lack of participation in the more essential and risky professions, women are much closer to being the bourgeoisie than anyone else. Thus 'cultural marxism' sort of ends up as a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 09:56 PM
1

I think another problem to discuss is that even so-called socialist feminists are problematic - their understanding of socialism is also right-wing. In that socialism is wealth distribution, ie. male ---> female and 'when the gubmint does stuff'. And in gynocentrism the gubmint doing stuff always means giving women disproportionate welfare [programs] and affirmative action initiatives. In other words, there is no real distinction between mainstream feminists and so-called outlier groups. Althoug…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 09:48 PM
2

How she's still holding the office I can't tell Why wouldn't she. Misandry is the institutional default.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/24 07:20 AM
3

II) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. This seems at odds with feminist/female hypoagency, which seeks to offload as much responsibility to men as possible. III highlights women's massive misandry and how they view men as utility but ironically enough would mean they themselves would adopt the drudgery that is traditionally male dominated. Which women have proven time and again they are not willing to do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/24 07:00 AM
1

Are you literal-minded? When people say, 'bad boy' what do you think that entails?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 07:52 PM
1

Right, when he made those murders, he simultaneously committed suicide. So how could he have been a 'bad boy' in any sense before that point? No-one can attract women if they're dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 06:55 PM
1

Are you implying Elliot Rodger was a 'bad boy'?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 05:46 PM
3

They do. Multiple statistics proving things like hybristophilia being almost entirely a female phenomena, bullies, gang members having far more sexual encounters especially compared to autistic men, inmates having groupies and receiving love letters in prison, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 06:54 AM
2

Ah, yes I already have been through most of his website and have it bookmarked. Its been awhile since my last visit and the name didn't register. His articles on chivalry and how it was perverted by European noblewomen stood out in particular, very compelling thesis.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 08:16 AM
2

Interested in this. Any pdf links?
/r/MensRights09/09/24 11:04 PM
1

I give it days.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 10:53 PM
1

Bears are good swimmers, too
/r/MensRights09/09/24 10:37 PM
2

I didn't bump into him. Friends set it up, and for the life of me I do not understand why he decided to date me. Due to the principle of least interest. He didn't have the privilege of being more selective or picky. That's men's experience.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 08:21 PM
1

So the government can keep its greedy mitts off the money, the kid gets the most benefit and the payer (usually the father in one what? 90% if cases) gets the tax benefit of pre-tax money going for childcare. This is one of the primary reasons why this is almost certain to never pass.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 08:18 PM
2

Tall guys (who ALWAYS list their height) claiming it's not true because they have problems, too. They are humblebragging. Frankly, I think any user that comes into a subreddit intended for short people doing that should be immediately banned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/24 06:38 PM
1

Its all gaslighting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/24 06:30 PM
1

Like most idiots, he can't keep his mouth shut about topics he really shouldn't have a platform on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/24 05:42 PM
1

Virtue signaling on reddit is hardly a privilege. It doesn't result in reduced sentences or lenient punishments like women so who really cares what happens on reddit?
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:28 PM
1

Being protected by the media amounts to virtue signaling with no real upside, seeing as it doesn't affect incarceration rates.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:26 PM
3

"That's not real feminism".
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:20 PM
1

Or a gay Christian for that matter.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:15 PM
1

Its just blind misandry. That's all you need to know.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 06:57 PM
1

This woman has been married four times and cheated on 1st and 2nd husbands. The fact this specimen has been in multiple relationships and procreated tells you how lopsided the dating and options are between the sexes.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 08:57 AM
1

They think they support socialism. In their mind, socialism is 'when gubmint does stuff' or 'wealth reallocation'. But socialism would actually require them to contribute.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 07:25 PM
3

Not really
/r/MensRights06/08/24 07:18 PM
1

A black man is more likely to be at a disadvantage, this is a combination of his ethnicity and his gender. However, in most situations a black woman is more likely to be at an advantage than not only a black man, but white males. This means that the gender gap is significantly higher than the ethnicity gap. Naturally this means white women have it easiest in the 'hierarchy'.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:43 AM
3

An equally ethnic, short and facially unattractive woman would be the perfect match. I’m aware of hypergamy and such a woman would have an easier time getting laid than her male equivalent, but fat and ugly girls with low self esteem crave such validation still. Whether they are the perfect match or not is irrelevant. Women don't see it that way and that is the problem. Unless you are Mexican. For whatever reason, men's height and looks seem to not be particularly relevant in that demographic. I…
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:38 AM
3

The reason they bring up childbirth is because its the only unique contribution they have. So they attempt to lord it over men. They know men basically provide everything else; its pretty much the sole card in their pocket.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:31 AM
2

It falls under child support. Well alimony is a type of child support. Just refers to a different kind of child.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:27 AM
1

The equivalent would be a spinster or a woman that refuses to enter a relationship because her standards/requirements are not met. There is no direct equivalent because no woman is unable to acquire a sexual relationship, as opposed to men.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:24 AM
2

There are close to 0 people who are actually involuntarily celebrate. Not really. If you are ethnic, short and facially unattractive you are basically out of luck. What's that? Pay a sex worker? Putting aside the logistics and legality of that, sex workers are not required to service any John and do in fact reject men on ethnicity. There really are men that are unable to get sex, but not the stereotype portrayed by media (many of which don't even identify with the term).
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:22 AM
6

If only. Unfortunately, many feminists find and get into relationships with men. Which is an obvious contradiction, you would think. How can you build a relationship with someone that supposedly oppresses you and and belongs to what is essentially a gender Illuminati. But feminism is built on contradictions.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:18 AM
1

You truly believe in 1920 all the women came together and decided to vote at once? 'All women' don't have to do anything. Just a large percentage. Did you know that several of the states that had originally granted women suffrage revoked it in the 1800s? Why would they do that if men had no problems with women voting? Because it wasn't just 'men'. Other women had issues with women voting, and in fact were the biggest hurdle. It is ironic you keep trying to imply I treat women as this monolith bu…
/r/MensRights18/07/24 04:21 PM
1

The idea that we all suddenly decided we wanted to vote as long as we weren't draftable in 1920 makes no sense. It makes perfect sense. Acquiring rights without responsibilities, ie. privileges is the best of both worlds. I'm also interested in why you think most men agreed with women's suffrage and owning property. There was a tradeoff for men owning property and managing family finances, in that it meant they were also culpable for all violations with the law and the handling of debts. Men wer…
/r/MensRights18/07/24 03:32 AM
2

Picketing is not terrorism. No-one said anything about 'picketing being terrorism'. Women as a demographic didn't suddenly decide that they wanted to vote when they learned they wouldn't be drafted. I mean, this is basically what happened. 1 2 Also aren't you contradicting No.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 03:14 AM
1

No, they went to jail because they were terrorists. I don't mean as a pejorative, but literally terrorists. They attacked innocent people, set off bombs and engaged in property damage. Despite all of this they were let off comically easy simply because they were women. After their disbandment, when women found out they could receive the vote without having to commit to military service they were granted it, it had nothing to do with 'challenging the system'. This was not the Civil Rights movemen…
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:56 AM
1

Why wouldn't he say that?
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:48 AM
1

That's like asking a roundworm to avoid all intestines.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:14 PM
0

God heals through other people If God needs to 'work through people' this makes God entirely superfluous.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:03 PM
1

Evidence?
/r/ExRedPill05/05/24 07:17 AM
1

Why is making money off of one’s attractiveness a bad thing? Never said it was. what if a man and a woman were in a relationship and making OF content together—no one else involved? Other people are involved. How else would they make money? Your questions make no sense.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 01:08 AM
1

I'm not a misandrist, I'm a feminist They're they same thing.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:18 PM
1

I've not heard the violence aspect, where did you gleam that information?
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:08 PM
1

OF woman unattractive The woman is already making money off of her attractiveness to begin with so your question is flawed. As to why some men aren't interested, the answer is exclusivity.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:00 AM
2

Unless they have the new game+ or legendary mons unlocked.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 02:19 AM
2

The same reason women decline ethnic men, poor men, short men, ugly men, etc. They don't find them attractive.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 01:49 AM
1

If I was a republican, they'd just dismiss me entirely The dems would dismiss you as well.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 02:00 PM
1

Feminism blatantly had eugenicist and racist notions on its inception towards blacks. If that's not right-wing than what is? It also considers men as a whole inferior and suggested that we be culled to a small percentage of the population.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 01:59 PM
1

Feminism started out as an explicitly far-right movement and has remained as such. It has always been conservative, and if you look at the dating preferences of women they tend towards what people would describe as 'right'. One of the issues with discussing the right/left dichotomy in the US is that its political compass is skewed. There is really no left political party, what people call the 'left' in America is recognized as left of center in the rest of world. For one thing, feminists/progres…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 01:56 PM
-1

I would say people don’t care about status. Women do care about status and wealth. Hypergamy is a real concept, and its almost exclusive to women even if its a bit exaggerated among circles like redpill. because if a woman happens to earn more than the male partner, the chances of the male partner being happy, are much slimmer and the chances of the male cheating are much greater Its the opposite. Women are displeased with lower earning partners and are more likely to withhold sex, cheat and lea…
/r/ExRedPill09/04/24 12:50 AM
2

tradwife stuff merged with redpill They for the most part haven't. But there is some overlap in that they're both grifts that place emphasis on men engaging in constant self-improvement which the gurus can take advantage of. Both are also conservative, in that again, all responsibility is placed on the man to 'be good enough' so he can attract someone and be a provider.
/r/ExRedPill09/04/24 12:48 AM
1

That's true, but its not 'people'. Redpill content is exclusively created to grift men. It actually constantly browbeats men into believing they are never good enough, women will never appreciate them and they always need to impress the female. This is analogous to the religious cycle of telling people they are perpetual sinners and will always need to come back to the gospel for a chance at redemption. Tradwives is a female grift, and its about getting a man to provide for you. The stuff about …
/r/ExRedPill09/04/24 12:40 AM
3

The common argument spouted by feminists when confronted with such facts is "patriarchy hurts men too. My response to that is to question what is the point of a organization that doesn't benefit its intended constituents? And why does the system which is intended to harm a certain group in fact grant them so many boons and privileges.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/24 12:18 AM
2

Make no mistake, women purposefully peddle the nice guy as villainous narrative because it reinforces things like the just-world fallacy and other things they would rather not be socially judged on. For example, women usually disparage nice guys that 'just so happen' to be physically unattractive, but you don't see the same rhetoric with an attractive male that possesses the same personality traits.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 10:31 PM
2

Most women are reasonable and will eventually see the disparity. Forgive my pessimism, but I can't agree. Women's default reaction to anything that disadvantages them, regardless of reason is a knee-jerk blaming of men. Even advantageous situations get warped around to gaslight men. Women's majority college attendance now blames men for our supposed lack of initiative and laziness, in a system blatantly catering to them. They won't be satiated, and they absolutely abhor any sort of accountabilit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 10:24 PM
2

Its not the 'left', but more accurately [neo]liberals, democrats and other center to center left people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 10:19 PM
5

You'd be surprised.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 10:13 PM
6

Its a common fearmongering narrative, especially for women who are more neurotic on average. The problem is that its empirically and even widely anecdotally not true in common observation - women do not in any way act like people that are in constant fear from men. In fact, things like women hitting and berating men prove the opposite. This sort of brazenness correlates with women's privileged position in society; they are aware they are unlikely to face consequences. If the Patriarchy™ actually…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 10:06 PM
5

Women don't seem to mind infantilization as long as it provides them with privileges.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 10:00 PM
6

Lesbians who are heterosexual Isn't this oxymoronic? Like a married bachelor? Or jumbo shrimp. Or peace missiles
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 07:54 PM
3

How do they expect men to get on board with feminism They expect men to get on board for the simple reason men have been on board with it since the very beginning and continue to do so. Women are entitled in regards to male assistance for the simple reason we have fostered said entitlement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 04:39 AM
1

You know it was.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 03:47 AM
1

I'm not sure how they are unrelated, but sure. To answer your question, let me put it this way: I had a choice as to what sex and ethnicity I would be born with I would choose white female without question. I cannot think of any disadvantages to that group in the current paradigm (and past either for that matter). To a slightly lesser extent, females of other ethnicities. There is really no downside to being a woman comparatively in the modern day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 03:41 AM
1

I said 7 years of puberty-based maturity each, with both ending before age 20. If you don't understand how staggered timeframes work, I don't know what to tell you. Fine, but that isn't how it works. Boys don't 'start maturity later'. Its that women's are accelerated in certain aspects in line with biological necessity. If we stopped mentally, emotionally, and intellectually growing significantly earlier than men...yeah, that's a big disadvantage. Again, its not because the functions of men and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 03:26 AM
1

found divorced men are significantly more likely to succeed in arguing for parental alienation than their female counterparts. Even if this is true (and I must confess I find it highly suspect), I would wager it doesn't take into account the legal fees men usually lose to the system in arguing custody. And of course it assumes that women are de-facto custodians to begin with. The fact that men have to argue against parental alienation by default is the problem. Frankly, I think this is a highly …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 03:15 AM
1

I used to think the same, but in recent years I've re-evaluated this stance. Frankly I don't think women are so much more socially competent than men as society allows them a lot of leeway in what they can get away with. Combined with the fact they cannot rely on physical violence (unless by proxy) so they have to use manipulation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 02:28 AM
1

It literally is. In my example, both the girl and boy matured physically over the course of 7 years. One started earlier and thus ended earlier. One began later and thus ended later. It's still the exact same amount of growth. If someone reached their maturation at 18, and another reaches it in their late 20's than that's not equivalent. What are you talking about? For example, if both boys and girls started physically maturing at age 12, but girls stopped at 16 and boys stopped at 19. Its ~25. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 02:08 AM
1

So yeah...still have no idea why having ones hormones stabilizing a couple years later is somehow important, when it's still the same amount of time. Its not the same amount of time. The point he's getting at is that something maturing earlier generally restricts its potential. Its 'ceiling' you could say. Whereas something that's slower to develop but has more time may have more potential. An analogy would be like trees. Sequoias take a very long time to mature, but when they do they reach giga…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 12:50 AM
2

What are the ways in which men are favored?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 12:39 AM
6

Can you point me to a current day influencail figure that you consider to be pedalling misandry? NOW
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 11:00 AM
4

Your points on MRA groups are false in my experience, because I had to actually run away from harrassment and bigotry I was at the receiving end of there. Sorry, I simply don't believe you. MRAs in general are a pretty reasonable lot. They bring facts to the table and some may be pretty passionate but abusive and bigots aren't terms I would associate with the movement. Speaking from the brief experience I have with you, your notion of 'harassment' is already pretty suspect to begin with too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 10:12 AM
7

crackpots Those crackpots are the creators, movers and shakers of the movement. No-one cares about your friends on the street that claim to be feminists or whatever. What's relevant to people [on this sub] are the ones that actually have influence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 10:04 AM
4

absolutely no basis to say that feminists are "right wing" just because they are feminists If that were my argument, it would be fallacious but it wasn't. My argument is that feminism is right wing based on an understanding what is and what is not considered left/right wing. For example, if someone is pro-capitalist they can say they're left all they like - but capitalism is a right wing concept. At best they can be center-left. The US binary system along with various other factors has greatly d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 10:00 AM
3

Few, though it was crucial Not sure what this refers to. mostly was overwhelming violent backlash and ridicule Yes, ironically enough the early feminist spiel was rejected most by other women. We still have ridicule and cynics and sexists arguing with feminism and we always will. Sadly, we don't have nearly enough. But yes, hate supremacy movements will always have their critics as long as they exist in society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 09:29 AM
5

Misandrists? Absolutely. Just a few choice quotes: The period of woman’s supremacy lasted through many centuries - undisputed, accepted as natural and proper wherever it existed, and was called the matriarchate, or mother-age. - Figurehead of the suffragette movement in the US, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, parroting the ideas of Frederich Engels, calling for matriarchy, for women to replace men in power, in an article titled Matriarchate or Mother-Age published in 1891. We [women] are, as a sex, infi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 09:25 AM
2

Go ahead and prove to me that female oppression was something feminism made up in the 1800s. I see no need to prove a statement I never made. To clarify, women had disadvantages throughout human history but they hardly had a patent on oppression. Both genders had a pretty raw deal but women never acknowledge this so their psuedo marxist rhetoric simply doesn't work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 09:16 AM
0

Women are protected because Women collectively demand for it, its just that simple. This has nothing to do with traditionalism. Its not that simple. What is missing from your analysis is why women can collectively demand it and almost always get what they want. That is issue here. Anyone can demand anything. What's relevant is what factors allow them to be catered to. The reason is gynocentrism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 02:59 AM
2

the feminism in the quotation mark was used in a mocking tone Um, why? When you get down to it, feminism is really of the right wing because its tenets are based in conservatism. They use the language of oppression as a manipulative tactic but they are as racist and sex negative as you can get. They expect men to cater to them and provide to them just like any traditionalist would.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 02:54 AM
7

If women built feminism from the ground They didn't. Women had men's support every step of the way. Its one of the factors that makes this malicious interference from women so hypocritical and disgusting. They were fighting a scarier fight in the 1800s with what gender equality was like back then. No they weren't. They basically were misandrists that justified their hate through the lens of oppression and are vindicated today through historical revisionism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 02:47 AM
2

There is no 'we'. You're fixated on superficiality. The actual policies and actions are what's relevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/24 10:34 AM
2

It is irrelevant what gender the leaders of every country is. What matters is who they cater to. If you think men cater to their own when they are in positions of power, then you are sorely mistaken. Women also make up the majority of the electorate, so in modern day politics, if men continue to be elected than its women who put them there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/24 07:09 AM
2

Women do have political advantages, and the three are not exclusive to one another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/24 01:36 AM
1

This is true, but given women's social and legal advantages they are clearly not 'weaker' either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/24 06:26 AM
1

women are the minority How are women the minority though? They are in most cases, a larger percent of the population, and almost always at an advantage in any statistics concerning well-being (homelessness, poverty, wealth control, welfare spending/programs, alimony/child support...you name it).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/24 02:18 AM
1

Sure. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233368360_Sexual_access_to_females_as_a_motivation_for_joining_gangs_An_evolutionary_approach https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704915613909 https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/svraca0911.pdf https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9c55/a8cae3c8a5d238002a261fec643f767d1126.pdf https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188691500210X?via%3Dihub https://www.newsweek.com/study-finds-men-nice-women-not-other-way-around-261269
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/24 06:45 AM
1

Absolutely no rationale for alimony in a society where women not only have employment, but preferential treatment, partisan courts and quotas. Even child support is in need of a severe overhaul, should it exist at all. One being that all expenses should be recorded and accounted for.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 05:08 AM
1

He has a point though. Many of these men do relentlessly mock and shame others, which can't help but reduce our sympathy for them.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 05:06 AM
2

And assets should be divided based on financial contribution. Which is de-facto men, and women know it which is why they would never allow this. Its also why we've being hearing more about this 'emotional/unpaid contribution' in recent years.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 05:04 AM
2

Thanks for reminding me one of the advantages to being an ugly male.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 11:59 PM
1

Still avoided jail time.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 05:53 PM
6

Well of course they're not. My point is their dishonesty on the issue. They're fine with situations that are to their benefit. When confronted on their hypocrisy they deflect or try to stonewall the issue. They can't even be honest about the fact they clearly don't want to work dangerous or less glamorous jobs despite it being blatantly transparent.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 04:55 AM
1

One issue is that the courts and police should enforce anonymity in regards to the defendant. Even if the case is proven false or inconclusive, the media attention is highly likely to destroy the man's life. Another is the blatantly partisan punishments administered by the courts. Women who falsely accuse usually walk away scot-free. This is unjust.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 03:12 PM
1

What did you learn?
/r/MensRights26/12/23 03:01 PM
7

I was being sarcastic. Its common to use the argument of 'think of the women and children' as an excuse to disadvantage men.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 03:00 PM
2

Monitoring incels? How? Why?
/r/MensRights26/12/23 02:57 PM
3

They can't help but engage in projection. Its to the point where when they make a statement, you can automatically assume the opposite and have a shockingly high success rate.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 02:54 PM
3

Probably has a husband that pays for most of her stuff. These types usually do. Hypocrite indeed.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 02:51 PM
6

We can't do that, because the children and the women might suffer. They said so.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 02:48 PM
1

Many of us don't even make what you're paying monthly. Absurd.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 02:47 PM
52

When you point this out the common response is to argue that equality shouldn't involve coercing women into professions that are undesirable. The irony is that many men take dangerous jobs due to lack of options or necessity is completely lost on them. Similar argument when women are confronted with the draft, although its perhaps more accurate to say they're sidestepping the issue there ("We shouldn't draft women, the draft is bad and should be abolished for everyone"!)
/r/MensRights26/12/23 02:41 PM
1

What in the fuck are you babbling about? You first try to claim that average doesn't cut it, only to be proven wrong in regards to context (ie. racial statistics). Then you come back and post some fantastical racist BS to justify how wrong you were.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 05:47 AM
1

It does matter depending on what's available. Being white counts for a lot if you're in Asia or India for example. Even in the US, WM/AF pairing is very common and most of those guys are definitely not 20 percent...anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 04:42 AM
2

What can 'romantic companionship' provide that which good platonic relationships cannot?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 04:44 PM
2

They're not. Women are opposed to men doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 03:01 PM
0

What's bizarre about it? And what makes a man 'weird'?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 02:04 PM
0

free market There is no such thing in the modern world. And capitalism certainly does not facilitate it. crony capitalism 'Crony' capitalism is simply the inevitable result of capitalism. Its like trying to debate the semantics between 'cancer' and 'late stage cancer'. It wasn't 'set up incorrectly', the system is performing exactly the way intended.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:48 PM
1

It still exists. Just the terms of ending the contract have changed.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:39 PM
1

The genderless utopia that feminist want does not and cannot exist. That isn't even what they want though. They desire female supremacy. In anycase, a genderless utopia could possibly exist if it were indeed truly genderless. And likely not what we currently regard as human.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 12:03 AM
1

As a 5'5'' balding Indian guy...I feel exactly the same. "I'm only 5'8'', white and average looking, woe is me"!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 06:51 PM
1

Except that women and feminists are two different groups. Not in any practical sense. When was the last time women as a bloc protested against feminism? Likewise, they are complicit in accepting all of its advantages via anti-male legislation.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 08:08 PM
1

Interesting how that argument is ignored when it comes to women only spaces.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 08:46 PM
1

I think you misunderstood me. You seemed to be implying that women were some sort of master manipulators and expert at navigating the social sphere to advantage themselves over men. I reject that notion. They're not particularly skilled at any of it; women are just riding the privileges afforded to them because of their wombs and vagina. all things that men would not normally permit. This depends. Even before what we would describe as women's lib or feminism women were afforded a lot of privileg…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 11:10 PM
1

What woman wants a spineless yesman? Plenty. Such targets make for easier exploitation. Sexually? No, but who said the man was getting sex out of the deal?
/r/MensRights18/11/22 07:41 PM
1

None of them did.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 07:30 PM
1

They're not good at it. Riding the biological and social advantages of a gynocentric species is nothing worthy of praise. All they've done is makes demands of a gender that is inclined to fulfill said demands. Its like saying a rich man is quite good at giving orders to his butler.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 07:28 PM
1

No they didn't. There was never a 'went from' phase.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 07:24 PM
1

Legally, they may as well be.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 07:11 PM
1

than a white cis straight woman Or even a black woman.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 06:20 PM
1

All that’s changed is the gender of the custodian. That's where gynocentrism comes in.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 08:45 PM
2

What counter arguments did she provide?
/r/MensRights05/09/22 08:26 PM
12

Feminism wouldn't even be a concept without men to leech off of.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 09:22 PM
6

Men need more private male only spaces, male only resources, male spaces to vent and shout and scream and rant and say ANYTHING they want without it all being monitored and judged and spied on and used against us This is precisely why women aggressively shut down or seek to infiltrate men's spaces. Allowing men to gather their thoughts and work to a common cause is the last thing they want.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 08:54 PM
1

Wimbleton pays female tennis players more despite playing less sets.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 05:46 PM
1

Its even worse than that. Since paying for a date does not in any way guarantee sex. At best you are paying for a chance having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 05:40 PM
1

When did I say what I was taught was right? Seriously? "The suffragettes fought for only women's rights simply because women literally had next to no rights" "How. It's literally factual". ""Done no research" my guy it's what's literally taught to us in schools.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:23 PM
0

"Done no research" my guy it's what's literally taught to us in schools. You don't seem to realize these statements can be mutually exclusive from one another. Internalizing what's taught to you in school without critical thought or outside research is the very definition of inculcation. Let's just forget the convenient fact that public schools are taught primarily by female teachers and run rampant with feminist influence.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:32 PM
2

literally factual There's nothing factual about it. You've simply regurgitated the common narrative in society about women's supposed past of second class citizens. You've clearly done no research on the topic but yet have the cheek to talk about the burden of proof. This is an easily debunked falsehood and has been repeatedly done so on this very subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:20 PM
1

Uh... yeah... isn't that my entire point? When the suffragettes first arose, feminism was exclusively about giving women rights and that was pretty much fine simply because women didn't have many rights. The keyword here is "had". It's my entire argument Then I'm saying your entire argument is incorrect.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:30 PM
1

What are you missing? The notion that women were some oppressed, put upon class that had no rights, privileges and were second class citizens subservient to men is revisionist history.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:19 AM
0

women literally had next to no rights This too, is false.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:54 PM
2

There was a time when feminism truly advocated equality No, there wasn't.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:28 PM
1

This is exactly it. "Creepy" is just the politically correct term women use for ugly or unattractive men. Women feel entitled to not be in the presence of such men and so using the word also incites others to attack them. Which they find amusing at worst.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 10:26 PM
2

Women genuinely feel offended by the presence of unattractive men. The term 'creepy' is simply a socially acceptable synonym for 'ugly'. You will never see a woman describe a conventionally attractive male as 'creepy'. Seemingly coincidentally its always short men, facially unattractive men, ethnic men, etc.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 10:23 PM
2

There is no being creepy. Its simply a covert word used to describe men women find physically unattractive. Calling men ugly in public would cause women to be judged negatively, so they came up with this nebulous term.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 10:20 PM
1

This is basically an argument for feeding hypergamy. Which is already a huge problem itself.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:49 PM
2

The marriage rate is near the lowest on record. Good.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:47 PM
1

African American women who were described as the most oppressed demographic Demonstrably untrue. Perhaps the female demographic that possesses the lowest privilege based on attractiveness in comparison to their other peers.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 09:46 PM
1

That would place accountability on women. Shudder Can't have that.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:08 AM
1

What's even worse about that case is that Dre's children are both 18+
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:05 AM
1

Not in the eyes of the law.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 02:45 AM
1

The mother does not need the father's consent.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 02:44 AM
2

Seems there is silver lining to my being a sexual pariah.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 02:43 AM
1

I roughly make your hourly wage and I can't even conceive of living on that income.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 02:31 AM
1

Two main reasons. Gynocentrism and consistent income stream from men. Even in the (extremely rare) cases females are mandated to pay support they are not punished for failing to do. Conversely, men are. The reason for this is because society is keenly aware men are primary producers of wealth while women are consumers. So its more practical to 'squeeze' us.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 02:30 AM
1

Right now most of these laws are in a strange place legally speaking and are not defined the way they should be. Because 'woman'.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 02:26 AM
1

But the courts haven't caught up to this reality yet. Its not that courts have innocently failed to adapt to the current times. This behavior is calculated and done with specific intent to benefit the state/government and women at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 02:20 AM
1

The guy only has to agree to the sex. Not the children. Also spermjacking and artificial insemination exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 09:48 PM
2

https://incels.wiki/images/8/83/Cumulative_net_fiscal_impact_per_capita.png https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2375926 https://www.nationalekonomi.se/ed/8-2012-argang-40/hur-valfardstjansterna-anvands-och-omfordelar-hushallens-ekonomiska-resurser https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320297610_Hur_valfardstjansterna_anvands_och_omfordelar_hushallens_ekonomiska_resurser/citation/download
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 06:28 PM
1

This is a pipe dream unfortunately. There are far too many desperate men willing to undercut others for a 'sexual strike' to ever work.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:03 PM
1

Personally I want to believe because someone has to start making a change and despairing and adopting a defeatist attitude won't bring us anywhere. I'm a pessimist regarding this topic because of the multiple factors at play here. To name a few: Men see each other as competition (sexual) which largely inhibits us in collaborating for our own self-interest Compounding this is the in-group preference women have (which allows them to largely function as a collective in both the social and political…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 06:17 PM
2

Men are complacent with it because they still see women as the damsels in distress being threatened by the evil men. They've made it their jobs to be the protectors of women. Their self worth as a man is tied to this. They must constantly reinforce the idea that they're one of the "good ones". It's because humans use a dyadic template to make moral judgments. While men more easily fall in the role of perpetrator and women more easily fall in the role of victim. That is gynocentrism, and feminism…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:58 PM
1

Projection, a common tactic for women. When faced with a situation that involves culpability, they attempt to decrease any psychological distress by reversing whatever they are guilty/accused of onto the other party. This also places the other party on the defensive, relieves them of self-reflection/loathing and allows them to take the higher ground. Thus it tends to come in tandem with gaslighting and whataboutism.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 07:36 PM
2

It's not necessary anymore, at all. Pregnancy has become really safe. One could argue that men's technological and philosophical contributions as well as the jobs we still have that need physical strength (builders, miners, soldiers, ...) are actually more important and nurturing strong men should take precedence so we can advance as a human species. The greater variation in males as described by the male variability hypothesis predicts a greater amount of men at the very high end of the spectru…
/r/MensRights09/12/21 11:18 AM
1

Gynocentrism was never "beneficial" to men. So do you assert that humankind could have reached its current level of development without it? Not largely, but completely unjustified. I would agree if not for the fact that humankind does still rely on women for gestating young. As much as I hate to admit it, they do possess inherent value due to that alone (although it is vastly inflated). When artificial wombs/sex bots that have overcome the uncanny valley effect are developed and are easily acces…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:07 PM
1

Perhaps a more appropriate word might be 'maladaptive'. Gynocentrism and callous treatment of men has long since become more harmful than beneficial given the current environment we find ourselves in. We are not only operating on outdated instincts but have allowed them to be ramped up to outrageous levels. The main reason why gynocentrism was advantageous was because women bore the children and hence the favoritism and resources funneled to them ultimately benefitted the offspring. It was never…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:37 PM
1

I see. You're referring to scenarios like when young child actors got fleeced back in the day due to their legal guardians having no restrictions on their pay? Like Gary Coleman. But still, in child support cases (not certain about alimony), the amount is deducted automatically from your employer's paycheck. Which is pretty similar.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:02 PM
2

They wanted more rights with zero responsibility Which is another way of saying they wanted even more privileges in addition to the those they already had.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:57 PM
1

Well, it does. Look up statistics on child support/alimony and male to female wealth transfer in general. They are essentially just excuses for women to steal men's income under the guise of "children's best interests" or "sacrificed years of employment". If I'm not mistaken, over 80% of wealth is controlled by women in the US. So women are quite content to have men make the money as they know in the end they will be spending it.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:55 PM
2

I'm surprised they haven't implemented a curfew on anyone with a penis yet. But then if they did that, the man-slaves couldn't go out and earn them money.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:48 PM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights03/12/21 07:38 PM
1

If only they could realize and accept they are just as bad as men They do realize it. Its why they seethe whenever someone tells the truth. Hence they want to control public discourse to maintain their preferred version of reality.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 11:18 AM
1

It's dumb that she quit over it She didn't. The company fired her.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 11:00 AM
1

He's still not incorrect. The one woman wrote the letter, but who enacted the legislation and enforces the laws?
/r/MensRights14/11/21 03:20 PM
1

I'm not looking to be coddled. You are. I really don't give a shit You gave enough of a shit to whine about it. I'm saying that saying something blunt but unproductive is asinine. You can be blunt and actually say something interesting and instigate a discussion. Oh, but what I noted was indeed productive. And telling in regards to you. You say you came to learn but you also admit you don't care to research [history]. So not only do you expect this to be another safe space where people cater to …
/r/MensRights14/11/21 11:02 AM
1

it certainly has hurt me, too I find this difficult to believe, but okay. the atmosphere here is highly unwelcoming What you wrote makes me think "I want to get the fuck out of here". Congratulations. This tends to occur with open forums. There is less coddling and so people feel free to be more blunt and speak from the heart. I have been polite with you, but this doesn't mean I am obligated to cater to your every sensibility. Yes, men have been and continue to be hurt. This will be reflected in…
/r/MensRights14/11/21 03:43 AM
1

Hm. Well tbph I don't study the history this much. That's rather problematic. Supporting a cause you don't know the history behind and all.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 07:06 PM
1

they also are more likely to have their debt paid/higher credit score/loans paid off Paid off by men.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 10:04 PM
1

The problem is this structure is hostile to modern civilization. Pre-agriculture it would have been fine, but not post industrial.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 11:43 PM
1

Unfortunately the law supports women regardless.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 11:41 PM
1

You're forgetting biological proclivities and gynocentrism. Those are also the reasons women do well. Unfortunately, women have vaginas and wombs. Men want access to that. This is to our detriment.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 11:29 PM
1

They can't be simply ignored. That's partly the reason we're in the situation we're in.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:39 PM
1

They have both ideological and financial reasons to keep the gig going. If it was known women have privilege instead of being downtrodden victims of the patriarchy, then a lot of professional feminists would be out of jobs and NOW would become perfunctory. The billion dollar schemes known as child support, family court and the domestic abuse industry would also lose a lot of their ill-gotten income. True equality would ruin the golden goose.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 11:06 PM
1

What they call themselves is irrelevant. Actions take priority over labels. At the bare minimum many women are complicit in feminism and misandry. I've not seen any outcry from the 'non feminists' regarding the plight of men.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 11:03 PM
1

Due to sex drive unfortunately.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 10:49 PM
1

Its like being a neo nazi and then getting offended when someone calls you racist.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 10:44 PM
1

I would argue what they're buying isn't really affection then.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 10:20 PM
1

If modern feminists are on the hook for the racism and pro eugenics stance of their progenitors, then it stands to reason that modern white Southerners who are legally citizens of the US must also be held to account for black slavery and Jim Crow. Hilariously, now that woke-ism has hit feminism it seems that mocking privileged white women feminists has become something of a spectator sport for non white feminists. Feminists actually affect policy/law making and biased family courts. They have or…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:07 AM
2

At least 30% of men in the US report as being involuntarily celibate. This doesn't even take into account cases like men in sexless marriages aka r/deadbedrooms
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:03 AM
1

It didn't fly right by me. Your literal statement was "Everyone has the right to drive or get a degree" not "everyone has the right to try to get a driver's license so they can drive and everyone has the right to a basic education and to apply to universities." Had you said the latter statement there'd be no debate from me. You're being pithy. You knew exactly what I meant. I justify morality as relative because without that Morality is indeed (largely) relative. That doesn't mean in hindsight w…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:58 AM
1

Driving itself isn't a right. The potential to get one via use of a driver's license is. Likewise the same is true for degrees and education. Everyone is welcome to enter higher learning and work for the chance of a degree. No idea how that flew past you. I live in the US. For the majority of fit (I use term loosely) men, the vote is tied to Selective Service at 18. You also lose other things if you neglect to sign up for SS. If you want to make the argument that selective service is wrong, and …
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:33 AM
1

Will never happen. Too many women are complicit with the movement.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:37 PM
1

The right to vote to shouldn’t be predicated on military service or any other type of service though. This is sidestepping the issue. The fact is that it is tied to the vote, and is thus a privilege to be able to attain the vote and not be subject to the draft. Thus, feminists could have campaigned in some fashion to abolish the draft along with requesting the vote but they did not. They were complicit with men being drafted. The whole concept of a right is that it doesn’t need to be earned. Not…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:34 PM
1

I hear Spain and India are even worse.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 04:20 PM
3

How tall are you?
/r/BlackPillScience13/08/21 08:15 PM
1

Now imagine this on a grand scale. This is what we are up against on a societal level. I'm very pessimistic about the future.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 08:45 PM
1

Predictably, the person responding still insists on women somehow having it worse in society despite every statistic and data conceivable making it clear women are the leisure class. Its like arguing the burden of proof with a born again Christian.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 02:33 PM
1

I'd like to see your post regarding this. My suspicion is that its similar to a point I made in the past regarding privilege and how they related to each gender. Women have always received privileges by default, while men's were bestowed upon them with the intent of ultimately benefitting women, excusing them from culpability and consequences. Now women possess even more privileges, which men previously held as mere rights (and even those have been eroded) resulting in men being not only a serva…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 01:14 PM
1

Well, its different because women are the oppressed class and yadda yadda yadda.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 12:17 PM
1

What could possible explanations be regarding this?
/r/BlackPillScience17/06/21 07:02 PM
3

Wouldn't it have been even more based to not have them in the first place?
/r/BlackPillScience17/06/21 07:01 PM
2

Yes. Don't get married. Don't have kids. Don't cohabitate or do favors for single mothers.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 08:58 PM
1

Essentially. There's an old saying along the lines of strength, intelligence, looks - choose up to two, can't have a third. There are outliers of course - I would argue someone like young Marlin Brando had all three, but the exception proves the rule.
/r/BlackPillScience09/12/20 11:03 PM
2

Are there any studies of negative correlations between masculine features, athleticism and IQ? My theory is there is a tradeoff between these qualities, kind of like allocating points for your custom characters attributes in a RPG. We know higher levels of intellectual capacity and physical strength require substantially more caloric intake. So perhaps biology has remedied this by not trying to 'max out' in all these categories.
/r/BlackPillScience18/11/20 05:40 AM
1

The moderates serve as shields for the extremists.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 04:45 PM
1

Gender studies teacher delusional feminist Isn't this redundant?
/r/MensRights07/10/20 04:33 PM
1

I don't think its even brainwashing. Women support it because of the benefit to them.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 05:26 PM
1

Arguably, they never were.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 11:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter