TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Technical_Brain1493 Archive

View 1 post and 44 comments by Technical_Brain1493 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
182

FeminismTechnical_Brain1493/r/MensRights23/04/26 03:51 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah, it's both ridiculous and mind boggling. It's almost like she didn't even bother to watch the video back because she had already made up her mind.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 08:38 PM
1

But both groups will be against the policy of paying single mums to have kids. Any party just needs to offer to scrap it to win. I think the only way it could work is if the top 10% of men are basically the millionaires and they pay all the tax themselves. We will essentially have become a chimp society.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 10:48 AM
2

Yeah, good point. They encourage sexualisation of girls and women and then act aggressively shocked when sexual harassment increases. And then blame the manosphere for men not approaching or asking them out in bars anymore.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 08:57 AM
1

Random. Not sure what you are hoping to achieve hear.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 11:17 PM
5

Misogyny is the hatred of women. I don't think I have met many such men in my life. Sexism is stereotyping and prejudice against women - that I see more often.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 08:43 PM
1

No, it was Express Economist
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:07 PM
1

Sorry, I didn't mean you were being racist, but given what the other followed up with, he definitely was.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 05:59 PM
0

Yeah, I broadly agree, but no need to be racist to make this point when our own history has plenty of examples to draw from! And if we are serious about MRA, we need to be serious about anti-bigotry too. Also, there was a paper doing the rounds on here that said in the literature review that humanity prospered when women were treated like chattel and increases in women's liberation is 80% correlated with falls in reproduction number across history and the world. If we carry on as we are, some we…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 05:11 PM
-3

Sounds like you are a general bigot, rather than a men's rights advocate then?
/r/MensRights29/04/26 04:09 PM
2

I think that's true in a historical sense, that it's due to the good graces of modern men. But I think we need to be careful that we are about real equality, and not fall into bigoted tropes, because that's how feminists will denounce our arguments to the wider public. I think you said it in a bit of an ignorant and, dare I say xenophobic, way. For example, Sri Lanka had a female prime minister before Britain, and the US still hasn't had a female president.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:02 PM
3

So I guess what you meant was: "Because we aren't actively trying to subvert imagined control"? Which is a nice way of summing it up!
/r/MensRights29/04/26 01:34 PM
18

Ok, sorry, I misunderstood.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 12:45 PM
-32

Are you implying men control women? That may have been true in our parents' generation, but certainly isn't true now. There are more feminists in positions of power within media, politics, public institutions and large corporations than there are the male equivalents (MRAs, incels, and actual sexists and misogynists).
/r/MensRights29/04/26 11:37 AM
4

Good question, and I totally agree. I think it's because they are running on anxiety and constantly triggered due to their childhoods of emotional neglect (CEN), some bad experiences with horny teenage boys in their youth and the misandrist narrative they have been fed, disguised as equality. In this world it's completely fine to be constantly triggered and prejudiced, as long as you direct it at men, and they validate each other in that endeavour. I think, by contrast, men have long been taught…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 11:28 AM
1

Sounds a good plan. The women are cute and like Westerners, the food, climate and geography is nice too. Best of luck with it.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 12:39 PM
2

Good luck mate - that actually seems a decent solution. What will you do out there?
/r/MensRights28/04/26 12:27 PM
2

They will realise once they hit 40 with kids and the marital sex dries up "because of feminism".
/r/MensRights28/04/26 12:25 PM
1

Stereotypes save time Jokes. Generalisations are useful, if accurate, because they allow us to analyse and discuss countervailing trends within society. It's a core part of the scientific process.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 12:23 PM
1

I don't agree with you earlier point, but I agree that Reddit encourages tribal brigading, due to the downvote system. I think only upvote and report buttons would make it better. But I would like to hear your views on my post above.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 11:51 AM
1

Essentially, they are getting some, or think they will, by aligning with feminists. Unfortunately, it's only when they personally get screwed over by the system of misandry will those unthinking men question it. That's also why they see us as "sad losers" and don't want to join our ranks. Personally I'm married with three sons, and so I'm motivated by what their future will be. Also most of my wife's crazy, and the stress in our marriage, is due to third and fourth way feminism. And I like to qu…
/r/MensRights28/04/26 11:48 AM
1

There's a difference between economically left and socially liberal though? I'd describe myself as a leftwing Keynesian/post-war social democrat and a UK Gen X liberal. I reject gen Y/Z / American liberalism because it's become more about the hurt feelings of "protected groups" rather than anyone's life chances and outcomes. And also no one outside said group is allowed to critique what they decide. So trans people trump women and women trump men.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 08:22 AM
6

Actually if you read the paper, this suggestion of individualistic reproduction is reverting back to the way chimps mate. So it's a massive backwards step in evolution.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:11 PM
2

Thing is, the paper says that fertility rates were increasing 1980-2010, before the banking crisis when families were doing better financially. So we could go back to that, rather than their bat shit suggestion of making 90% of men an underclass.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 06:13 PM
2

The problem is encouraging women to be promiscuous, non? I.e. 1990s third wave feminism?
/r/MensRights27/04/26 06:07 PM
1

This sort of thing makes me value democracy more.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 05:48 PM
4

Yeah, good analysis, thanks. The thing is though, it will never cut mustard democratically as the incels will become 90% of the male population and 45% of the total voting population. An this phenomenon is already driving anti child narratives in the UK such as "you breed them, you feed them" and a backlash against the welfare state.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 05:45 PM
2

So we will end up with a load of good looking idiots in the next generation, who will reduce productivity and further reduce the tax base this insanity is based on?
/r/MensRights27/04/26 05:01 PM
3

Quite incredible. The end state of feminist and liberal individualism.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 04:55 PM
3

It's so ironic it's maddening, but they somehow can't see it.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:38 AM
6

Yeah. And the title was originally "How the manosphere ruined dating" and then they changed it to "Has" when they realised they had given away the bad faith nature of their "investigative journalism".
/r/MensRights24/04/26 12:10 AM
7

fresh off their divorces in which they had to "carry the mental load" and "mankeep," etc. Nailed it 🤣
/r/MensRights23/04/26 09:44 PM
6

Yeah. They seem to think they are carrying the baggage of 100yrs of oppression on their shoulders. I guess the only consolation is that not many if them will have children and humanity might be able to reset in the next generation!
/r/MensRights23/04/26 09:20 PM
5

Yeah, exactly. All aspects of the "manosphere" are reactions to different aspects of feminism. Some of it is hateful, but some are just logical reactions to the world we now live in.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 09:09 PM
1

Sounds a frustrating situation. Personally I'd go for emotional distance: do your own thing and try not to interact with her. Enjoy being a dad and seeing your mates. If she questions why you are doing that, tell her you are hurt she doesn't seem to care about your happiness, and has broken the marriage promise to "love and cherish", and emotional distance is the only way you can protect yourself. Maybe that will put the fire under her. If not, when the kids are older, maybe start thinking about…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:54 PM
11

Yeah, absolutely. I actually tried posting this article on the AskFeminists sub out of curiosity and it was a pretty wild. They all just got so offended and came out with stock attack lines that had nothing to do with my post. It's almost like their world view is that every bad that's ever happened to women has been caused by "men". And they really seemed to enjoy ganging up on me and downvoting me 😂. I'm relatively new here so had to pull the plug to protect my Karma points. But then some expre…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:34 PM
12

Also, when the interviewed women said they didn't want to date, the presenter didn't speculate that was because of the femosphere, even though she showed clips of such influencers.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:17 PM
11

The thing is, the video was edited to make it look like the men were doing exactly what the influencers told them to, but she didn't even ask them why they decided not to date, nor which influences they follow. Perhaps many men, influencers or not, just come to the same logical conclusion?
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:15 PM
9

Probably something along the lines of: if women ever do anything mean, it's because men forced them into a corner 🙄
/r/MensRights23/04/26 06:51 PM
15

Yeah, I suspect a large part of this is a correction to the experiment of third wave "sex-positive feminism" in the 1990s. This saw women encouraging other women to repeatedly put themselves in physically vulnerable situations with strangers. Fourth wave feminism (#MeToo) was a reaction to the ensuing horror women experienced, but instead of reversing the previous wave, the narrative was changed to: men are bad and must be educated to behave better. When articles in The Guardian didn't achieve t…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 06:14 PM
11

Yeah, unloved or emotionally abused boys who grow up to be unloving and abusive men.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 04:36 PM
2

Ah, thanks
/r/MensRights22/04/26 10:09 PM
6

Some references to where the data comes from would give it more credibility.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:51 PM
3

Oh, where is that?
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:50 PM
2

Thank you OP - I've given you an uptick for making me writhe around on the floor with laughter. Pure comedy gold.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter