TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tectonic_Sunlite Archive

View 0 posts and 117 comments by Tectonic_Sunlite on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

~70% of women report having persistent rape fantasies, and fairly animalistic traits are commonly rated as the most attractive. Which study is this? The only one I'm aware of says 62 (and far, far fewer who had them very often iirc), and closer to 50/50 for erotic fantasies. And regardless, the fact that people are capable of getting off to something is very far from proving that it defines their sexuality. Freud, Foucault, Bataille all wrote extensively on this subject. Foucault was an absolute…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 11:13 AM
1

There are absolutely studies that suggest men are more kinky on average, though it's roughly equal if you adjust for libido levels. The only exception is that women are more likely to be masochists, though men are of course iirc more likely to be sadists, which seems worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 11:07 AM
–

This meant that women had to do X and men Y. Nothing generally wrong with that. However, what we are doing currently is letting women choose between X and Y, but still expecting/forcing men to stick with Y. This is rather vague.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:57 AM
–

Relevance? I didn't claim they did. So the women who bought those houses fairly compensated them for their contributions? Drink water from the ocean if you believe this. This is just stupid. If you live a place with freshwater, you can probably drink it and be fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:47 AM
–

The highlighted section literally says that men also cost the state more than they contribute, and while it isn't mentioned as a possible explanation, this doesn't distinguish between women who have children and women who don't have children. This is relevant for a few reasons. For one, the costs of child-birth at state hospitals is generally counted to women, even though child-making is a two-people affair. Secondly, women with children are more likely to work part-time. It isn't hard to imagin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:44 AM
–

Nettavisen isn't that bad, but it also isn't one of the most serious papers
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:42 AM
–

Norway is very much one of the most egalitarian countries in the world
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:39 AM
–

If they were truly so off-base, they would be dismissed and ignored. Would you say that this is true for other things that are popular but don't get dismissed and ignored, like Marxism? Not sure I agree with that particular argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 10:37 AM
1

At least three of the four things you mentioned are more or less closely related social situations, all of which typically revolve around people getting intoxicated. Pretty narrow, don't you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:56 PM
1

This is basically tautological
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 06:53 PM
4

Alright, what would you define as appropriate?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 09:23 AM
1

Like I said, people use the word to mean different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:14 PM
1

Nice is commonly used to mean being an inoffensive people-pleasing. Maybe you can be some kind of confident while being "nice" in this sense, but it can certainly imply not standing up, offending or displeasing someone when you actually ought to.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 10:02 AM
0

Whose beliefs would this be? Nobody who thinks women are even a little like men should be surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:51 PM
0

Reddit soyboys that go online that claim they are castrated good bois that can EASILY get laid if they go out on tuesday (Hyperbole obv) aren't the average (And most times especially with people on reddit, they are lying to simply be contrarian and win an internet argument if you hopped through the computer their online story to real life situation would be completely fabricated) . If being a "castrated good boi" is what being nice means, then it is probably preferable not to be nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:48 PM
1

Could you cite those statistics?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:45 PM
5

It shouldn't be surprising to anyone anywhere that looks are sometimes prioritized over character. I mean, what percentage of men do you think will choose the good ugly woman over the vicious hot woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:44 PM
5

Completely different person, but that depends what you mean by "nice." People sometimes use "nice" in ways that imply always leaning towards being pleasant or inoffensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:41 PM
0

"Niceness" sometimes means weakness and insecurity. Niceness often means being an inoffensive people-pleaser. It depends on how people are using the term. In this sense, being nice can actually be morally bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:41 PM
–

"If white people were so racist, why did they free the slaves?" If you swap "racist" for "oppressive," at least, this might be a fair question. Western countries freed their African slaves (who were often originally bought from other Africans) before the Arab world or Africans themselves did. Its almost like being able to give other groups of people the "rights" you never had to fight for makes you the top and most powerful group, since you are dolling out all the rights. Western or white people…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 09:15 AM
–

They didn’t want to. Women campaigned and protested and sacrificed their lives over the course of 100 years to get the vote. This obviously isn't accurate. The best you could say for the more radical suffragettes is that they helped push the issue forward towards the end because they put it on the agenda, giving more attention to the more moderate campaigners who had worked for a century. None of the women involved had even the slightest chance of actually forcing anyone to give them the vote. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 09:12 AM
–

Is the post edited? It literally says "they" gave women the right to vote, not "we" This one explains itself. If men were truly oppressive tyrants over women, why would they give them the right to participate in elections?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 09:09 AM
3

(Writing a second reply because you edited your comment) You don’t want to engage in why it would be considered insulting to someone’s manhood why they can’t fuck women, but no equivalent exists for women. The equivalent would be "slut," since men and women are different in this regard. This is a relatively new phenomenon that arrived with societies shifting towards agriculture and patriarchy. Yeah, here come the Rousseauian fantasies I was talking about. There was totally a mystical state of na…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:38 PM
4

I might've misread your comment then. I don't really think the post works for someone who doesn't use it themselves. The question seems to be why the same person would use "incel" as an insult while insisting sex isn't important. Edit: The point stands, though. You seem to be suggesting that individuals use it as an insult because men find it insulting, and not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:33 PM
5

I never made that claim. It’s definitely imposed by patriarchal society. I'll leave the implicitly Rousseauian "patriarchy" stuff to the side for now, so let's go with that. I'm not asking whether you think it's a matter of socialization, I'm asking why you think they feel shame for it except when they're shamed for it externally? Humans are social creatures, and will often feel bad when enough people shame us for something even if we don't actually agree with them. So in some cases, the reason …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:26 PM
9

Because men and women are different? Also, what makes you think that men find it insulting in a vacuum, and not because you are joining in on externally imposed shame?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:11 PM
15

That is, in fact, not how insults work. Generally you pick something which is (or which you take to be) held as insulting by both parties. In this case, it's pretty obvious to me that you do (even if you wouldn't readily admit it to yourself) find the idea of a man being unable to get laid somewhat insulting, and that you're saying this because using such an insult is unsavory from your own ethical outlook. Obviously it will be hard for me to prove those intuitions, but I have a very hard time b…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 07:58 PM
–

I mean, there is very little you literally cannot live without. You can live without hot showers, for example, but most modern people would be pretty frustrated if they had to go without them indefinitely. I agree with you on comparing sex to food or water, and on whether people can and should learn to let sex go, but I don't think it's accurate to deny that going without sex will feel like a serious affliction for most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 07:44 PM
–

For better or worse, most people's sexual drive is going to be strong enough that not indulging it is going to feel like affliction, quite similarly to any other "need" which isn't strictly essential for survival. That's not to say they can't or shouldn't learn to live without it, control their appetites and find fulfillment elsewhere, but it will be legitimately difficult for many.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 07:29 PM
–

The Maslow pyramid really isn't beyond criticism. It's kind-of silly to say that people need sex the way they need food, water, sleep etc. You can live a good life in celibacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 07:22 PM
–

This is pretty obvious cope
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 07:21 PM
–

But the idea that someone can't get laid is pretty central to it, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 06:22 PM
6

"Feminism" is too broad of a label (at least if you just look at what it can mean intellectual, independently of what most self-identified feminists support in practice, though even there I think there's a lot of variety) to make sweeping claims about what it does or does not offer anyone. Another problem with this framing is that people have more interests than just dating opportunities, and feminism (of any kind) is a broad ideology that covers all kinds of spheres. Moreover, it's simply wrong…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 12:06 PM
2

Nope, none of them cite a single case of women facing backlash for reporting low happiness or life satisfaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 12:39 PM
2

These articles largely don't discuss anything even close to the topic at hand. The first one is entirely about women in positions and power or status, and the second one also spends a lot of time on that, on top of mentioning that rape is under-reported and under-convicted (because it's hard to prove). Aside from that, they don't make any concrete claims that they even remotely back up with research or statistics. None of them say anything to prove that women prior to second wave feminism were p…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 12:37 PM
1

Imma need a citation for this claim
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 12:20 PM
1

The culprit of what? Men generally do more serious violence because most men are way more physically capable of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 11:53 AM
0

This is stupid, women weren't censored from saying they were unhappy before second wave feminism, or even first wave feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 11:52 AM
1

You're right to be skeptical of happiness stats, but there also isn't anything better to look at
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 11:51 AM
3

Misandric isn’t a word. God, you people are uneducated. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/misandric Normal men don’t find feminism gross. More and more do. I'm not one of them, btw. I no longer identify as a feminist but I don't find all feminism emotionally "gross". It is, however, increasingly unpopular among young men. And yes, people absolutely find some expressions of feminism gross or weird. Even normal, otherwise pro-feminist women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 11:49 AM
1

This is kind-of a weird line of argumentation. Picking out examples of some famous feminist women (with a variety of "types" of feminism) who have families doesn't prove that feminist ideology has no negative impact on family formation or relationships. It certainly does not prove that feminism has no negative effects on women (doubly so given the large variety in strands of feminism). This woman married a guy who was more high status at the time and had two kids with him. She became famous writ…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 11:46 AM
–

and if he cares about female pleasure in bed I genuinely think I've met (at most) one guy in real life who claims not to
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 11:11 AM
10

This is one-sided rhetoric if I've ever seen it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 05:38 PM
3

Why? Is there any reason I should believe this? Or believe it specifically in the case of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 05:37 PM
13

Do you really not see the contradiction between saying this and denying that women's expectations can ever hurt their romantic partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 04:59 PM
9

People having bad standards, en masse, hurts everyone. And yes, obviously unhealthy standards can hurt your romantic partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 04:57 PM
6

Even in literature they show their hypergamy, she is an average girl with no experience who falls in love with the athletic, handsome and wealthy guy, The reverse of this is, like, an old Hollywood stereotype
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 04:56 PM
15

Fantasy does say something about people's psychological state, but it isn't a 1:1 with what they want in real life or actually value. I suspect an overwhelming majority of young men have watched porn they wouldn't or shouldn't be proud of.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 12:18 PM
3

Obviously. Justified or not, using X as an insult is shaming X in general. Idk why people selectively ignore this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 12:18 PM
4

As a foreigner, it's not hard to understand why Trump won when this is how the "left" speaks about low income populations, farmers and the old-school proletariat. As if cruelty or stupidity is the only reason people who have gone through economic downturns and have felt largely unsupported by the political chance would vote for a populist candidate. Like, imagine laughing at desperate people who (at least understandably) hoped that tariffs would help bring local industry back. What's wrong with …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 09:30 PM
1

Not you dont because you also said this: you're not making the "asshole" point very competently All you’re doing is implying is that its a problem of politics and not behavior. I might agree in some cases and disagree in others, but I certainly understand why you feel that way. The focus just makes it seem like other ideological issues are taking center stage
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 02:49 PM
1

If you can recognize asshole behavior, you have enough context to see the problem. I really don't, though I can infer it's probably an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 02:42 PM
2

You guys? Where did I imply I can't register assholes who aren't cheating violent felons? I fully understand why you think these guys are assholes, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:21 PM
2

We can tell women to make smarter choices while also pouring as much social shame as possible on the men who act like that
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 07:27 AM
2

Why “==“ instead of “=“? Probably he thinks he looks smart by informing us all that he knows (at least some) programming
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 08:56 PM
0

Yeah, because "nice" tends to mean agreeable in a weak way
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 08:54 PM
2

There's no reason to use "==" when not programming lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 08:53 PM
3

Or just don't lie to people. I don't see how this is hard
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 08:49 PM
1

I thought nearly everyone could, at a minimum, agree that feigning romantic interest to get casual sex is bad
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 08:48 PM
1

The main reason I can't tell what that guy did wrong is I have zero context for the random balloon smashing. In any case, it seems like your only go-to example of nerds being assholes is being right-wing. Which, yeah, people should date someone with similar values, but you're not making the "asshole" point very competently.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 08:44 PM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 04:19 PM
1

That’s not about responsibility, it’s about presuming loss of value post-relationship instead of focusing on building something lasting. If you aren't ready to vow to stay together for life, then you're implicitly open to the relationship failing. You haven't committed yet, and there's no reason to pretend otherwise. If you hold that purity is important, then you are reducing her value if the relationship ends. The kind thing would be to keep this in mind. And if we’re talking about hypocrisy, l…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:51 AM
2

your mindset shouldn’t immediately jump to, “what if we break up?” That’s not a strong foundation for any relationship. That's the responsible and reasonable thing to do. There's a reason traditional societies often require marriage/commitment before sex begins. If you value a partner with a low body count, the reasonable thing to do is to be correspondingly careful with adding to it yourself. Otherwise, you just wanna have your cake and eat it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:28 AM
1

So yeah, in terms of things at scale, there is an innate contradiction hardwired into men. In a lot of traditional societies, the answer is class hierarchies. You would have respectable, high (or high enough) status women who were expected to be pure and slaves/prostitutes/etc (and sometimes certain clerical women) who are fair game to sleep with or even rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:24 AM
2

This is mental gymnastics. If you haven't even committed (in fact, in general, if you wouldn't be ready to marry) then you're implicitly open to breaking up. or even wait to have sex until both are confident it’s long-term? That's the main option if you want to be principled about it - to regulate your own openness to having sex based on what you expect from potential partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 08:56 AM
2

Sure, that had engineering
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 08:00 AM
1

This is a strange argument. They didn't have most STEM either lol In fact something like law, history, philosophy/theology and literature has been way more common historically.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 07:26 AM
1

You do know that mental plasticity and its relationship to brain maturation is a fairly well-understood phenomenon, right? This isn't just about environments.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 05:31 PM
8

As a STEM graduate its important to remember that most non-stem courses are essentially baby talk nonsense. That's not true, at least on higher levels. (I have studied a STEM field and a humanities field) Edit: There are quite a few women in many "useful" fields too. Also, what makes you think the humanities or social sciences (if stripped of leftist nonsense) aren't important for civilization m
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 04:17 PM
1

Lots of men will not want to admit they're violent sadists who get off on the idea of hurting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 02:38 PM
1

Oh, okay. So it's not really a problem that women like it? You know a lot of women openly engage in that kind of stuff, right? I don't really see the lying. Unless, of course, you try to extrapolate the extent to which it's enjoyed beyond what you can actually support.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 02:37 PM
1

Rough Porn: Is consensual. Doesn't involve any permanent injuries. Only intense roleplay with boundaries. You mean like Fifty Shades of Grey, which doesn't include rape or permanent injuries last I checked? I think you just want to defend men's sadistic fantasies. Anyway, bdsm people also frequently spread misinformation about what is or isn't physically safe, or what can lead to permanent injuries.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 02:32 PM
1

You haven't presented anything that addresses my arguments, questions or that suggests the statistics I've read are mistaken. You can't even answer how you define "rough". Asserting that someone is wrong is utterly worthless when you can't back it up at all. It just makes you look very much like you don't have a good response.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 02:26 PM
1

You're not making an argument at this point, you're just (falsely) asserting I'm wrong. I think this is because you're unable to actually refute me, or give any details without making it abundantly clear you're giving men a lot more leeway than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 02:20 PM
1

So if we got enough people together to ban homosexuality or interracial marriage that'd be completely okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 01:57 PM
1

So what would you say if I wanted to base sexual laws in private feelings that are personal to me?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 01:32 PM
1

No, I meant older. Autocorrect, sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 01:31 PM
1

Wrong on so many counts, it's laughable. Use one of the plethora of search engines. Not here to spoonfeed you the meanings. Do your own research, eh? This is based on everything I've read on the topic. And that's not leeway. That's exactly what it is. 50 Shades is way less problematic than a lot of the popular porn out there. There have been studies that show men get desensitized with normal porn and seek out more dominating stuff. That doesn't mean it's not revealing an actual fantasy that appe…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 01:30 PM
1

So this is just about your feelings. Alright then. I'm put off by relationships where the woman is much older than the man, but not so much vice versa. On that basis, I suggest we ban one but not the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 01:22 PM
2

No. For that to be true, a huge portion of men has to be watching violent porn. And they should specifically seek it out. As far as I can tell, a lot of men do seek out violent or sadistic porn. Based on available statistic. The amount of choking in popular porn has increased massively, for example. And the amount of women reporting unwanted choking during sex has increased correspondingly. And yes, in case it needs to be said, choking someone is very much violent, not just "rough". Starting wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 01:16 PM
2

So you'd agree that while many women are attracted to violent and evil men for unspecified reasons, a huge portion of men actually are violent and evil, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 01:11 PM
1

Citation?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 01:08 PM
2

Sure, and it also criminalizes lots of healthy relationships. Why not criminalize all romantic relationships? No more sex for anyone. That way, nobody gets taken advantage of.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:34 PM
1

Is this law based on anything except your feelings about it? It seems you've ditched making any actual arguments (Aside from, presumably, your own emotional responses) in order to save yourself from implying anything specific about 18 year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:32 PM
1

I disagree. This is like I'm trying to pass a simple law, and you are adding a bunch of pork into my bill. I'm focusing on one thing at a time here. Feel free to address the rest of those rights and freedoms in your own separate thread. Do you really not understand the concept of consistency and inconsistency? You don't seem to really have any arguments, except that you really don't like older men sleeping with younger women (And vice versa?). I'm not seeing it. I think it's possible to focus on…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:30 PM
1

Are you trolling? This is the most insane take I've ever heard. A 25 year old is way more likely to hold lots of power over an 18 year old, than a 38 year old is over a 25 year old. Similarly, the maturity differences between the former two will often be way larger than between the latter two, at least in some sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:27 PM
1

That's deducing a relevant underlying principle
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:24 PM
1

That's not what a whataboutism is. An 18 year old is considered old enough to make a decision to go into a warzone (Where they might die) to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:24 PM
2

You don't think a 40 year old man can make his own decision to date an 80 year old woman if he so chooses? Anyway, it's ridiculous to suggest that being into 18 year olds is pedophilia, and do you have any data to support that relationships with age gaps are inherently way more likely to be abusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:22 PM
2

Do you think all men who play FPS games sincerely want to be in a warzone?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:15 PM
1

Good and nice? Being too nice can be incompatible with being good. As in, goodness and niceness can often recommend completely contradictory behaviors.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:09 PM
1

Assuming that people literally want everything they read about (Even everything they find erotically appealing as a fantasy) is a massive leap to conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:08 PM
2

Going by popularity trends, it seems like lots and lots of men are into violent pornography. Would you direct the same sentiments at the male population on that basis?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:05 PM
2

It is completely true that even if a very small percentage of women are sincerely interested in violent psychopaths, it can still be quite a lot when someone is known to the entire population.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:57 AM
1

Do you actually think most women are writing love letters to serial killers?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:44 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:31 AM
3

Of course it's hypothetically offensive to ask for a DNA test. You're implying that the mother might be unfaithful. I'm not saying it's wrong or that she shouldn't understand, but to say it's "nonsense" to think it's offensive is, well, nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:27 AM
1

Most normal healthy people, men and women, can get a decently attractive body without starving themselves or doing anything unhealthy. Do you have any evidence that trying to get a partner is commonly a direct cause of eating disorders in women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:05 AM
1

this is very easy to say when you're a woman and need to do literally nothing to attract the opposite sex. This isn't true. Women have an easy time getting laid, typically. They do not necessarily have an easy time finding a decent long-term partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:17 AM
1

A little bit, sure it is. It's way, way easier to change your personality when you're younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:12 AM
1

That's obviously not true. Like lots of other things, it just gets harder to change as you age.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:11 AM
2

Sure, but Nietzsche's romantic feelings for Lou Andreas-Salomé seem to have been very serious and persistent. The main takeaway is he was a somewhat bitter incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 02:57 PM
2

Sure, but he very much found someone he wanted to be with and probably had many long conversations with her
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 02:42 PM
4

Not true. Nietzsche's problem, quite famously, was that his crush wasn't interested in him. He was an incel, basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 02:37 PM
-1

Okay tough guy. This is a completely useless position to take on a discussion forum. Like what, are you expecting her to say "Oh, yes, I will abstain from having any opinions at all on what men ought to do".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 03:45 PM
-4

This is absurd on many levels. Obviously people can have opinions about what men should behave like, and what masculinity should be. Just like you're currently having opinions on what femininity should look like.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 12:31 PM
1

It's totally within reason to call it a quasi-cuckoldry, but it's not literal cuckoldry. Quasi because you know you are raising another man's kids, rather than not knowing as she commits paternity fraud like you see with the cuckoo bird. Cucking is quite literally unknowingly raising the offspring of a different male. The "unknowing" part is quite important. It's fairly ridiculous to suggest that raising another man's kids is, in and of itself, comparable to cuckolding. To take an extreme exampl…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 10:27 AM
3

Okay, the word "complain" was besides the point, though. If men enter relationships for sex then they also love women for what they provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 10:36 PM
4

Do you see how it's contradictory to complain that women love men for what they can provide, and then admit that men enter relationships for sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 10:07 PM
1

I would guess that the idea you're describing is more along the lines of "Women often experience a sharp decline in attractiveness after their peak years are over (Whereas men peak a little later and decline less quickly) so they risk being saddled with far worse options than they could've had in their 20s".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 04:43 PM
2

The only "calling" is just an animal urge which can be easily overridden with logic. Notice how uneducated women from lower class backgrounds often have kids young? That's because its a poor decision and not rooted in logic. Reason, not logic. Sorry to be pedantic. Anyway, this isn't a very persuasive argument. Why are we supposed to believe that the only reason educated women do something more often is because it's more reasonable? One obvious reason why people with a lot of formal education ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 12:45 PM
–

Like wanting to have children, or feeling that having children is your calling, or wanting to have many of them. Pregnancy will ofc affect your body regardless of age. Aside from that, you're largely just reasserting that it's bad. Like, in what respect will a young mother be falling behind her peers? Certainly not in the pursuit of family. It's also not wasting your youth unless you're presupposing that childrearing isn't what you're supposed to be doing at 18-25. You don't need to isolate your…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:58 AM
–

This is just myopic. There are lots of good reasons one might wanna have a baby young.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:42 AM
0

But only in some cases are women blameworthy for choosing those men. It is indeed possible to be abandoned even if you didn't do anything recognizably wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:22 AM
–

Men wouldn't need to keep people safe if they didn't as a gender commit the crimes to begin with. This is completely nonsensical. Men would, first of all, still need to keep people safe from natural dangers. Secondly, there will always be dangerous people (Women and men) on this side of eternity. A society without dangerous men to be protected from is useless to speculate about, and doesn't prove anything about the men who risk their own skin to protect you from them. Ah yes bring up the outlier…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:16 AM
5

That depends on whether you are a man or a woman. In seriousness, there isn't a gendered answer to who makes better partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:10 AM
2

casual sex is altruistic lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 05:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter