TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TeeJee48 Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by TeeJee48 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

In almost every "western" society, more than 60% of co-habiting couples are either childfree or have adult children who have moved out. You are objectively wrong. "Yes, I want to debate in a debate subreddit. Who would have thought!" - You are debating against arguments no-one has made. You may as well argue with a mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 07:06 PM
3

As I said: "Multiple young kids? That's all day every day." You argued with OP, and now me, over points neither of us made. No-one said looking after kids isn't work. You put words in OP's mouth, and now you have actively ignored me saying the exact opposite. I don't know why you are so desperate to argue, but I'm done entertaining it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 06:50 PM
1

You said: "They both work 8 hours and she should work the evening and night on top of that alone" Standard employment is 8 hours of work. Being the stay at home spouse can vary greatly depending on the situation at home. Multiple young kids? That's all day every day. No kids and an easy to maintain house? Maybe an hour or 2 a day. Either you misread OP and thought the partner didn't work, or you somehow came to the conclusion being a stay at home spouse always means at least 8 hours of work a da…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 06:28 PM
2

I merely corrected your misunderstanding, that's all. You're arguing against a point I didn't make.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 06:15 PM
1

Re: the come home from work thing, OP was talking about a situation where the women doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 05:18 PM
3

There's a difference between sleeping with someone who isn't very good at it and sleeping with someone who has intentionally deceived you to manipulate you. And just because one car metaphor works doesn't mean all car metaphors work. I'm not sure if you're stupid, or just trying desperately trying to justify hating women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:06 PM
1

Actually it's spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 04:56 PM
8

The logic is simple. When you come in aggressive and accusatory, people get defensive. It's not complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 09:38 AM
6

You attack an entire gender and then complain when they defend themselves? You make no sense. Rape is awful, no matter the scale. That is the default position of the vast vast majority of people everywhere. It doesn't need to be restated every time it happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:03 AM

Lying by omission to get someone to make the decisions you want them to because you think they will make different decisions if they know the full truth is a pretty clear example of manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 03:52 PM
1

I mean I would hate to be accused of negging (which is a gross manipulative, predatory thing to do) when I was just trying for a bit of silly banter with someone I felt comfortable with. If that person told me "please don't speak to me like that it upsets me" I would sincerely apologise and revise the way I speak to that person from then on. Not everyone is receptive to banter and that's fine. If they accused me of negging I would be offended at the accusation of me having such bad intentions. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:35 PM
7

The funniest thing about this is the self-reporting nature of it. You know it isn't the attractive women getting upset over your comment.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 05:55 PM
14

Oh well if the very small number of men who are comfortable enough with her to talk in detail about their penis claim to be content that must mean genital mutilation of babies is perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 07:29 PM
0

You made a bunch of stuff up, I quoted your nonsense and challenged you to tell me where I said what you claim. You have failed to do so even once. If I'm wrong - answer my bolded questions from a few comments ago. Not hating all women =/= being a feminist apologist. It's just being a reasonable adult. Try it sometime.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 06:18 PM
0

My initial comment mentioned "too many". Not all. Not most. Too many. Your lack of comprehension is on you, not me. No response to my questions to you then? Good to know that you know you are wrong and are just making stuff up, even if you can't admit it.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 05:13 PM
1

Don't tell us men on here are hating on women or that women are awful. They never said those things, and yet here you are saying that. I gave you a specific example, which you have conveniently ignored. Here are a few specific examples from comments on only this thread, thankfully not as harsh as the "all women are murderers" example: I always give women the benefit of the doubt and then shit like this happens. I hate women. It’s a mad world. Nuff said. They want equality when it suits them. Ess…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 10:49 AM
1

You are still making up things I haven't said. To recap, you're the one who stated 'too many people on here are looking for any justification to hate on women'. When told that disagreement isn't hate, because that's exactly what you're saying with that statement In what world is that what I'm saying? I explicitly said what I am talking about, you even quoted it back to me - I'm talking specifically and exclusively about people looking for justification to hate on women. Thankfully it is a minori…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 10:49 AM
1

At no point did I ever state speaking out against double standards is hate. I didn't say anything close to that. I hate the double standards myself. Yet again you are creating a straw man argument. I just gave you a specific example with an exact quote and extra context. I called it out when I saw it, and I'm calling it out again now. So to summarise: you pretend I say things I didn't and argue against them. You ignore the things I do say that you can't argue against. These are the actions of so…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 03:35 AM
2

I never claimed disagreement equals hate, why are you arguing against something I didn't say? I'm also not saying that speaking up against unfairness is hate, once again you are arguing against something I didn't say. "No one is saying ALL women are awful"? Here is an exact quote of a comment from the last thing I engaged with on this sub: "I hope there is a special place for apologists like you. It's literal crime done with the sole reason he was a man and nothing else. This is typical woman be…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 03:20 AM
-2

You made a vague, unspecific statement about disagreement, don't act like I'm the idiot because you expressed yourself poorly. I'm well aware that not everyone here is a women hater, but if you think that all women are awful then that is just hate and you're no better than the man haters. I'm not saying that describes you, but it definitely describes some people here, and those are the people I'm calling out.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 01:44 AM
0

Okay, relevance?
/r/MensRights08/08/25 12:31 AM
13

Amen, too many people on here just looking for any justification to hate on women. The problem isn't all women, it's legal inequality and certain women of a particular mindset.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 03:52 PM
1

We have no idea what her real motivations are based on the article, other than her claims that he's a monster. If she is, as you claim, a deranged man hater who killed him for no other reason than misandry then I hope she suffers the worst possible consequences. If there is a reason for her calling him a monster other because he's a man then there's nuance. That reason could be weak, like he was cheating on his partner with her and she found out she was the mistress. Immoral, but hardly deservin…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 03:58 PM
-10

This isn't a men's rights issue. She killed him, she's being charged. Based on what she said either she's deranged or she knows of some monstrous things he's done and she killed him for it.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 11:23 AM
2

I don't doubt it, but it doesn't change the fact that you shouldn't try to draw conclusions from tiny amounts of data.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:14 PM
3

Fair enough, but to clarify that wasn't my comment nor is it how I think. I just saw a conclusion drawn from almost nothing and called it out is all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:54 PM
1

You were making wild assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:34 PM
0

Did I say it was?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:20 PM
15

Your sample size of 1 may not be the most robust data set to base a claim on.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 12:57 PM
1

"I will emotionally torture my son during his childhood, and as soon as he becomes independent he will cut me out of his life forever".
/r/MensRights17/05/25 03:35 AM
20

The opposite happened, people complained, and the organisers were forced to apologise. https://nypost.com/2022/09/13/stripper-performs-for-wheelchair-bound-seniors-at-nursing-home-sparks-backlash/ So... grats on being wrong on all counts I guess.
/r/MensRights17/02/25 02:45 AM
10

There is significant gender bias on Reddit, as in the real world. Unfortunately I can't remember the post specifics well enough to find the links but there was I think an AITA post where the man was overwhelmingly considered TA, then someone copied the post word for word except for gender swapping everyone and once again the man was judged as TA.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 10:13 AM
2

If one partner is asked to give up/delay a career in order to be able to contribute to their family in other ways then yes they absolutely deserve alimony. The problem is that alimony to the woman has become the default position regardless of circumstances.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 07:49 AM
7

$10 says the guy just has bad eyesight.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 06:24 AM
27

TIL at least one of the mods on that sub is an over sensitive obese women who can't get laid.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 10:25 AM
-1

At no point did I say the word murder, you seem to have me confused with someone else. Although, what would you call what happened to George Floyd? And that was in public.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 02:59 PM
-2

So you're taking a turn of phrase and choosing to interpret it as a literal (and logically impossible) statement? Do you think this makes it okay to support corrupt police? Fwiw I'm well aware "not all police" etc. but there is a troubling lack of accountability for the minority who do abuse the power given to them. I think it's reasonable to acknowledge this.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 01:12 PM
-11

You may have missed the "or abusing" part.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 11:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter