TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Teebs123 Archive

View 0 posts and 85 comments by Teebs123 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You mind talking about your anger phase? What drove you to it? What did you think or do during that time? I only ask to gain more insight into the states of Red Pillers going through something like this. I already read M3's incel post but I'm also interested in your experience in particular.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 11:03 PM
1

Reminds me of something I saw on TRP a few weeks ago when I was goofing off: "Marriage is Red Pill on damage control."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 10:50 PM
4

Don't put words in my mouth; I never said anything of the sort. It's not that she doesn't deserve better, it's that someone who lets herself go to that extent might not be able to snag a better mate. She should break up with this guy but also fix her weight problem if she wants to improve her prospects.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/16 10:20 AM
4

she could do better gained 50 pounds in one year Pick one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 11:23 PM
1

lived without my self-respect May I ask about the story behind that? Of course you don't have to talk about it if you don't want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 09:16 AM
2

Fair enough, though I don't think that means they should be aiming to be Chad. I think that in its fetishization of the relatively broad choices that women have in the sexual marketplace, TRP (understandably) forgets that many men have no interest in being Chad, or even in having nearly as many casual sex options as a typical girl might have. Most guys really just want to learn the skills for getting and keeping a girl and replacing her if things don't work out, and that's a perfectly fine goal,…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 08:54 AM
3

This actually looks like solid info for outcasts trying to acclimate to social settings. I think the people criticizing the advice against approaching girls and not drawing attention to oneself miss the point that this is supposed to be a guide for beginners who can't handle even basic social situations. You wouldn't try giving a speech if your social anxiety prevented you from even holding a conversation. It's the same thing here; if you can't act normal with one person, the added pressure of b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 08:48 AM
2

Why not? Just curious; don't answer if you don't want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 12:55 AM
2

Stop reading TRP and, if necessary, PPD. Though it may be true that certain women stop maturing after their teenage years because society enables a lack of accountability on the part of women in general, it is not true that women in general stop maturing after 18. Women having the same rights as men does not destroy society. You are not contributing to the downfall of society. Stop taking hyperbolic misogyny seriously and see a psychiatrist for your mental illness if you aren't yet. No shame in …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 12:46 AM
3

Hell, I agree with her. Though I don't believe in violating the rights of others, I don't consider the existence of humanity to be an inherent good. So if society's dissolution is brought about by loads of people making choices that are good for themselves but not necessarily good for society as a whole, so long as they're not violating others' rights I don't care. I'm not going to become a workhorse provider for some woman and child in a legal contract that might fuck me over just because doing…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 01:11 AM
4

It would benefit him since he could use the extra time he would've wasted on a failing relationship to find someone else. I'm not saying you're morally obligated to do anything, but the benefit to your mate is obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:29 AM
5

Man I would've had a hard time hearing that without raging internally. I've not yet reached that zen state where I just accept that it's no use getting mad over people being purely self-interested and sociopathic when it comes to relationships. Did you at least tell your mate so he knows to jump ship?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:10 AM
1

That or 19 but as I remember she's still in her teens.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 04:13 AM
2

Given that most men have probably been rejected more than once yet don't throw public tantrums or hurt people over it, I'm going to say poorly handling rejection is just a general trait of (usually inexperienced) people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:15 PM
4

Beg to differ. Sure, it's not the only characteristic they'll choose you based on, but for many it is a necessary, non-negotiable quality. See female dating profiles that explicitly reject men who aren't romantic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 10:36 AM
4

So the poor behavior of a vanishingly small minority of men justifies that characterization of most men?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 10:32 AM
5

Fortunately none, but this doesn't mean that the strong social expectation doesn't exist. It's like the pressure on women to look good. Are men in general so picky that they'll spurn anyone who isn't a supermodel? No, but women still experience a pressure to be attractive that men don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 10:15 AM
13

You're probably reading too much into his post. Nowhere does he deny that women can be romantic, and he doesn't say that he's never experienced romance or romantic love from women (in fact, several men in that thread say they have). He's speaking about romance primarily with regard to its presentation in romantic comedies (explaining why men don't like them) and social expectations of men. It's true that men and women can be romantic, but only men face a strong social expectation to be so in ord…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 07:20 AM
9

Truth. Even a pathetic, supplicating husband despised by his wife can be "needed" for his income. Being needed isn't nearly as big a compliment as women think.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:01 AM
12

I'm not gonna write much because I'm tired as hell, but I read this earlier today and it was spot on. He described exactly why I hate the notion of romance and why I do not value the pursuit of romantic love. Incidentally he's also described some of the impetus behind RPers' anger phase. When you (not me in particular, I'm not a red piller) realize that in most cases a woman's affection is inextricably tied to your performance of masculinity, and that the chances of finding romantic love that is…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:35 AM
1

How exactly does time/money influence this decision? I think this is mostly based on emotions, not quantifiable assets... If the time or money invested is worth the pleasure of someone's company or companionship, then you continue the relationship. If not, then you break up. Yes, there are exceptions—people who stay in marriages out of obligation or take care of their demented or seriously ill spouses—but this only further highlights the fact that most people, albeit subconsciously, behave as ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:15 AM
1

SMV is an attempt to frame the value of a person as a whole. No, it's an attempt to frame the value of a person as sexual partner. Though that may encompass some of their most personal attributes, it's meant to quantify a person's value in a specific context. It's no different from a company judging my potential value as an employee; this can include anything from my work ethic to how my personality fits with the workplace culture, but ultimately it's a judgment of my value as an employee, not a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 04:51 AM
1

Even if you do, you have to admit that "resources" aren't quantifiable and completely subjective. First, for many resources this is simply not true. Time spent with or on your SO, money spent on your SO, and monetary debts and assets s/he may bring into a marriage can all be quantified and taken into account when deciding whether to have or continue a relationship with them. Second, just because something is not quantifiable doesn't mean it cannot influence rational decision-making in a market. …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 04:27 AM
5

Lol Jesus man, I don't know what happened to you but I hope you can move past it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 11:17 PM
3

Speaking of Japan, Ghost Hound was a confusing series. I don't know if I just didn't get it because I watched it in high school. I'll revisit it someday.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 05:33 AM
2

Damn YEC, I've gotta say I'm pleased every time you show up in a thread. Every one of your comments is gold.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 04:21 AM
1

How long were you with her before you found out?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:54 PM
2

I don't get how wives tolerate dirty, cluttering, or disorganized husbands. To be fair, it's not like they usually have to tolerate them. Social norms typically suggest that all things domestic are the wife's domain and that the house should be cleaned/arranged to her specifications. But your point does illustrate how even people who love each other sometimes aren't meant to live together.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:53 PM
2

This mentality where a woman takes de facto ownership of the house while a man is consigned to some pitiful corner is one of the reasons I wouldn't live with a significant other. I'm not going to break my back to finance a home/apartment/whatever in which I'm made to feel like a stranger. Not saying all couples are like this but I don't get how husbands tolerate wives who are that overbearing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:24 PM
1

Almost laughed out loud in the middle of class at this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 09:56 PM
2

I'm shocked that a feminist homeless shelter would recognize International Men's Day to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 09:46 PM
1

You mean deliberated? Why would you consider suicide over your partner's sexual history?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 09:43 PM
6

The Average Person Lost my shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 05:25 PM
1

moral realism Quick note: moral realism is basically the belief that there are objective moral values, i.e., moral values that do not depend on the opinions of any one person. Examples of moral realism are moral reductionism (which says moral properties are reducible to natural properties) and moral intuitionism (which says that some moral facts can be known a priori, without having to argue for them, and therefore moral properties can't be fully reduced to natural properties). Cultural relativi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 04:12 PM
1

What do you think would have to change for you to be happy?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 01:36 PM
6

Out of curiosity, why would you humiliate someone you slept with?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 03:39 AM
4

Lol here we go. I'm not even gonna respond to OP's latent racism; I'm just here for the comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 04:00 AM
0

The more radical elements always take over an organization over time and I see no reason to be optimistic as I see formerly sane men like Novy degenerate into the morass of bitterness. Do you have any examples of Novy's "degeneration"? I've liked his insightful criticisms of pickup artistry in the past but I haven't read any of his recent articles, so I don't know whether his attitudes towards PUAs or women has changed. As an aside, this: Game with all its paraphernalia for the humiliation of wo…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:41 AM
1

Do you have any evidence that vulnerability (itself, and specifically not attendent whineyness, weakeness or patheticness) is unattractive? Unless you're going to argue that every man mentioned in the above link was whiny and pathetic when being vulnerable in front of their families, that link counts as evidence. Also, the three traits you list in parentheses are so subjective as to be meaningless, because it allows you to dismiss any example of a man's vulnerability turning off a woman with the…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 03:32 AM
2

Zero, but this is irrelevant because I've seen some of my male friends cry in front of other male friends without being ridiculed for it. Also, crying is not the only way to express emotional vulnerability, and for many it may not even be the most powerful way, or even the right way. A deep, heartfelt discussion about someone's anxieties might make someone feel more vulnerable than crying ever could, and I've had plenty such discussions with my male friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 03:20 AM
1

How exactly would sleeping with someone else be cheating if you both agreed on a non-monogamous relationship? He could be banging someone else right now and that wouldn't be cheating, would it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 04:09 PM
1

I'm not saying women or some women don't perpetuate it. I never said you said this. I was responding to lol's post, which implied that men were primarily or solely responsible for perpetuating harmful masculine traits. As I've shown, this is not true. Nor am I saying that my point injures your thesis. Men won't be vulnerable because they want women who apparently don't want overly vulnerable men. If you mean that men unwittingly go after women that, contrary to men's desires, won't allow them to…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/14 07:43 AM
1

To echo Cyralea, I don't propose that women collectively force themselves to become more attracted to sensitive, expressive men since attraction cannot be negotiated. I do propose, however, that they reflect on how they perpetuate and benefit from male stoicism, and at least acknowledge that they reinforce this harmful gender role as much as men do. I'd also propose that they not badger men for not being vulnerable because 1) not everyone solves their problems by displaying vulnerability, and 2)…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/14 07:31 AM
1

Yep, I touched upon that in a post here. In the link contained in that post, the interviewee notes that stories about female disdain for male vulnerability get the biggest reaction from the men in the audiences she speaks with, so your experience is confirmed by loads of other men even though your interlocutors would have you believe that you're just speculating or inexperienced. One of the most persistent double standards in gender discourse is that if a minority of men are responsible for some…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 09:13 PM
3

Yeah, reading this thread I'm wondering whether the people saying things like "straight guys compete with other" and that male brotherhood doesn't allow for vulnerability have actually observed straight male relationships or are going off of crude stereotypes they've heard from coffee-shop feminists. As a straight male, I've never been chastised by my straight male friends for being vulnerable and I've never seen them do that to anyone else, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 05:40 AM
4

Yep, this is one of those trends that irritate me about gender discourse: even avowedly progressive people dedicated to dismantling gender roles will victim-blame and objectify men like any other traditionalist. If something bad affects women, it's either men's fault or men are uniquely obligated to fix it. If something bad affects men, it's men's fault, too, and even when women play a role in it they have no such obligation to help men fix it. And men need to fix their problems not because they…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 05:35 AM
2

The point is if men discarded the historic "masculine" notion that displaying emotional vulnerability in front of other men is wrong, they would be able to overcome this disadvantage. What's conveniently left out of these discussions is that women play just as big a role in stifling male vulnerability as other men do. Men are stoic not just because men expect it, but also because women expect it; they've learned the hard way that despite female exhortations to vulnerability, even their loved one…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 05:14 AM
3

If that analogy bothers you, try: "If you want to know how to sell a product, talk to the salesmen, not the customer."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 09:05 AM
1

Thanks, I needed this. Overall I'm satisfied with my life but I know I've been passing up opportunities that I could have used to push myself and make it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/14 03:24 AM
1

Examples? I'm not red pill but sometimes I check that subreddit when I'm bored, and I haven't seen any racism on it yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/14 11:03 PM
2

I think he's exaggerating for effect. He's probably not saying that 75 is normal for girls, but he's making fun of people on /r/relationships who argue so stridently that n-count doesn't matter that they'll excuse any girl no matter how high her count is and shame men for having misgivings about committing to promiscuous women with no history of stable relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/14 09:33 PM
3

tl;dr: Two wrongs make a right, and it's okay to viciously stereotype a broad swath of people for simply being the same sex as your oppressors. I doubt you'd hold this position if, in a female-dominated society in the near future, oppressed men spewed misogynistic invective as vengeance against their female overlords. I imagine in that scenario your "oppression makes this double standard acceptable" argument would seem less convincing. I also don't buy the idea that this double standard "combats…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 08:23 PM
1

Would you look down on a Red Piller who turned down a highly qualified woman for a job on the basis of scientific data showing that men usually perform that job better? Or a white supremacist who similarly discriminated against blacks? Even if one sex is on average better at a job than the other, to assume that a particular applicant is better or worse because of their sex is sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 04:11 AM
1

That's pretty virtuous, though. Wasting their time any further by pretending you shared those feelings would be the wrong thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 07:06 AM
1

I don't have many stories. I remember a girl in my microbiology class was interested in me and only afterward did I realize it. Early in the semester I came to class in a heavy jacket and scarf and she asked more than once "When are you going to take off your clothes?" I thought she meant "coat" so I thought nothing of it. Months later she was trying to get me to take her to a parade or something. I said I would but decided to sleep in the morning of the event because I was tired and it was hot.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 06:50 AM
7

Most people I know consider themselves to be feminists or to hold feminist sympathies. The alternative is to believe that women and girls are inherently inferior. And that sort of false dichotomy is why people don't want to identify as feminist. Many shun the label because they disagree with the movement's actions or approaches to solving societal problems, whether it be feminist approaches to domestic violence that cast the male as perpetrator and the woman as victim or preponderance of evidenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 04:35 AM
1

Why would you never hang around me? Do you suspect I behave like a loud, crass, man-hating feminazi? I promise you I'm quite sweet and pleasant to be around. I'm sure you are, but people don't hang around others based solely on how well they behave, but also on the belief that their behavior accurately reflects a person's private dispositions. It's cold comfort for me that a person who otherwise treats me respectfully can't help but think that members of my sex have a tendency to seem inferior t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 09:48 PM
1

It isn't a duty, but in my opinion it is the right thing to do This sounds like a contradiction. If by "right thing to do" you mean "morally obligatory," then it would be a duty since all moral obligations are duties we have to others or ourselves. Or maybe by "right" you mean "prudent" or "considerate," but not obligatory. Have I misinterpreted you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 09:26 AM
2

Nice. Good to see a fellow eugenicist kicking about, though I tend to favor the more direct methods. I don't think this is a eugenicist belief. Eugenics concerns improving the human race by controlling who gets to procreate rather than discouraging procreation wholesale. The latter action sounds more anti-natalist than anything. I don't have a problem with that, but my main concern would be that it would depress an already falling birth rate, which means fewer younger people to deal with our agi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/14 10:51 AM
1

Ha, that reminds me of this one time I saw some blood on the inside of my condom after sex. I still don't know how that happened. Maybe I was going at it too hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/14 07:28 AM
1

I think by "female choice" he meant sexual selection (which can drive evolution) rather than women willing taller, larger men into existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/14 07:10 AM
4

At least you have the honesty to identify these thoughts as sexist rather than justifying them with "men are the oppressor so it's okay" nonsense. I would never hang around you but I respect your candor. Guys have a tendency to seem unobservant, oblivious, and simple-minded The guys you know, you mean. Surely there are plenty of women who'd disagree with you, the same way I disagree with TRP's stereotypes of women as inherently manipulative, selfish, and emotional since I know plenty of women wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/14 04:30 AM
2

Great example. It's always fun to cite this example to feminists who argue that feminism helps men, too. Funny how a movement that has exploited the stereotype of men as predators wants to turn around and claim that they care about male suffering without lifting a finger to fix this legal impediment they've placed in the way of male victims seeking help. Then they have the gall to declare anyone who distances themselves from the feminist label a misogynist. It's appalling, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/14 03:39 AM
1

New Flying Lotus album: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2lXD0vv-ds8 Ride - Going Blank Again: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=blD0FsZW9V4 Enemies - Embark, Embrace http://enemiesmusic.bandcamp.com/track/coral-castle The Bulletproof Tiger - You Wanna Kiss About It? http://thebulletprooftiger.bandcamp.com/track/our-band-name-sucks I've listened to the last two over and over so I need new music.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 11:39 AM
1

Talking about your feelings is "beta" after all, and you gotta maintain frame and be the AMOG. I'm more of a purple piller than a red piller but this made me lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 06:14 AM
1

You're assuming without evidence that the OP's hypothetical lonely male gets those responses because he's entitled. OP's not referring to men with a sense of entitlement; he's saying that even men who talk about their loneliness are stereotyped as entitled jerks for merely complaining (even if they're not blaming anyone and are earnestly looking for solutions).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 06:12 AM
3

Does anyone else love it when Manhood Academy drones comment on articles about gender issues on other websites? The aftermath of their trolling more than makes up for their content-free blathering. Nice Magic card, by the way. Is it from the new booster pack?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:37 AM
5

Ugh. That's no better than the petition to classify MRAs as terrorists in the wake of the Santa Barbara tragedy. How embarrassing for them.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:18 AM
9

As Abby Ohlheiser at the Wire points out, A Voice For Men’s homepage currently links to a petition to ”class feminism as a terrorist group.” Though I saw the petition, I see no link on AVfM's homepage to it. Did I miss it or are they just making stuff up?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:14 PM
5

Pretty good subreddit filled with a lot of in-depth, well-researched posts. I need to read and post there more often.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:22 PM
11

Funny how it's racist to invalidate an argument by showing it justifies racism, even though the argument against making generalizations about entire groups already presumes that racism is bad.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:48 AM
11

So they banned you right after you posted that comment? Why? I see nothing objectionable about what you said.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:41 AM
15

"We support Red Pill as a group, but we categorically do not support hate directed at women " There are two problems with this approach. 1) It's contradictory. One can't support TRP without supporting the sexist rhetoric of some of its endorsed contributors (see the parts about women being fundamentally irrational, emotional, and Machiavellian). There's some good advice in there (the part about nobody caring about weak men is spot on), but it's interspersed among sexism that it appears most MRAs…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:59 PM
19

I oppose the routine denigration of women's intelligence and capacity for empathy that goes on in TRP. Basically, the idea that women are emotional, irrational mercenaries that do what feels good in the moment and throw others under the bus when it suits them. Whenever someone complains about this, TRPers reply that 1) stuff like this comes mainly from new subscribers reeling from bad relationships, and 2) they deliberately use inflammatory rhetoric to scare off more moderating, censorious force…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:25 PM
16

You can defend a group's rights without supporting its beliefs. I support the right of racists and sexists to espouse their prejudices but I'll still criticize them and work to bar them from positions of power. Any support for TRPers' rights the MRM gives would be because of their being human and not out of agreement with their worldview. At any rate, I haven't seen any MRA say that Red Pillers shouldn't have human rights so I don't know why you've asked that question.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:59 PM
11

I get what you mean. I only meant anti-feminist in the sense that the MRM disagrees with feminism on several points of gender theory (patriarchy, rape culture, male disposability, the causes of anti-male sexism), proposed solutions toward gender-related problems (like due process rights of college students accused of rape), and feminism's effectiveness in addressing problems that impact men (e.g. feminist groups erasing male rape in India, the failure of a feminist-led overhaul of the FBI's defi…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:30 PM
18

I'm not even an MRA and I can state confidently that this was trash. The author confused MRAs with Red Pillers, wrote an entire article criticizing Red Pillers, and then passed it off as criticizing MRAs. The two movements have very few similarities other than 1) being anti-feminist and 2) talking about male-related issues. If he bothered to do any actual digging he'd find that there's very little overlap between the two groups (a recent subreddit analysis placed it at something like 5 percent),…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:11 PM
2

That picture is terrifying. If I were a male baboon I'd rather be celibate than take my chances with what looks like a festering sore on the female.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:11 PM
2

If you just want sex, you're better off paying a prostitute $300 for guaranteed sex rather than $100 on a date for the (very low) possibility of sex. If you want a serious relationship, sites like these attract women who are more interested in money than looks, personality, or compatibility. You'd have to be lonely or desperate to put yourself in this lose-lose situation.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:02 AM
6

Research supports the view that to focus solely on certain social groups or “types” of students in the effort to end campus sexual violence is a mistake. It is so refreshing to read this from an organization like RAINN. I'm reading the rest of the letter later today; I'm pleasantly surprised.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:34 AM
3

Adding to point 1, Smith assumes that someone who says they're not feminist is an anti-feminist, but the two are not the same. A non-feminist could be an anti-feminist, but could also be someone who is indifferent to feminism or has never heard of it. He'll also be criticized for assuming that Tumblr feminists are representative of feminism, but that detail doesn't bother me much. I also think he could've talked about the negative legal impact of certain feminist initiatives on male victims of s…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:14 AM
1

Someone should screencap the article before HuffPo changes its mind and pulls it.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:05 AM
1

You know how many times I've been laid from having a lazy okcupid account? It's ridiculous. I'm curious. How do you do it?
/r/MensRights12/01/14 02:07 PM
10

First off he quotes code red as the reason he does not trust women. No, he's quoting code red because the other poster called him bitter, which he interpreted as a shaming tactic. This is the code red entry in its entirety: Charge of Irascibility (Code Red) Discussion: The target is accused of having anger management issues. Whatever negative emotions he has are assumed to be unjustifiable. Examples: “You’re bitter!” “You need to get over your anger at women.” “You are so negative!” Response: An…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:30 AM
9

What exactly is hateful about MockingDead's message, though? Scrubbing his post of the silly alpha/beta terminology, all he said was 1) the most attractive men are likelier to get messages, and 2) rich unattractive men will only get messages from people who want to take advantage of their wealth. That seems no more controversial than saying that men will message the most attractive women on dating sites and ignore the unattractive ones. It doesn't mean that all men or women are like that, but si…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter