TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TelMegiddo Archive

View 1 post and 45 comments by TelMegiddo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

TelMegiddo/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:08 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Honestly, it doesn't matter. She decided she didn't want to have sex and any reason in the world is good enough.
/r/MenSupportMen28/09/22 05:20 PM
0

Right? I want both Feminism and MRA to exist. They both seek to solve the same problems through the unique gender perspective that each one is better at adressing. Feminism doesn't need a rebrand, Feminism and MRA need to start working together with similar goals, but specialities towards the genders they represent. Women will always be better at bringing up and addressing women's issues. Likewise, men will be best suited to adressing men's issues. What we need most is collaboration rather than …
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:35 PM
3

Don't feel too bad about the leniency. This is news now. She didn't get off with shit. All her friends have seen this at work by now, guaranteed.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:08 PM
3

Damn. I read the article and I really thought she was going to say she needed to rethink her perception of male attention since she is getting older and assumedly wiser. I was gonna tell everyone to read it and chill out on hating her. Nope, fucked it in the last paragraph.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:05 PM
4

I'm gonna go with Poe's Law and assume you are asking a serious, literal question. Here you go. sea·soned ˈsēz(ə)nd/ adjective 3) accustomed to particular conditions; experienced. "she is a seasoned traveler" synonyms: experienced, practiced, well versed, knowledgeable, established, habituated, veteran, hardened, battle-scarred, battle-weary "seasoned sportscasters" antonyms: inexperienced
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:58 PM
56

Though suicide has become a major issue for the military over the last decade, most research by the Pentagon and the Veterans Affairs Department has focused on men, who account for more than 90% of the nation's 22 million former troops. Little has been known about female veteran suicide. From the article. OP, don't incite needless hate. They are aware and state more than once that this affects more men. The article isn't downplaying male military, it is focusing on a relatively new piece of data…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:20 AM
8

'Those dirty fucking whores who dare let a man touch them. They can sit in the back where they belong, with the rest of the pigs. Maybe their children will get raped by all the pedophiles and they can finally realize how oppressed they are and how empowered and not raped they could be in the front of the bus.' Ugh, sorry if that went a bit too far, but this, this infuriates me beyond belief. This is the most unadulterated, pure form of gender discrimination I have seen in a long time. I want to …
/r/MensRights17/12/15 04:20 PM
2

That counter sadly doesn't hold up to scrutiny when you include gender ratios. Still, this infographic is fuck.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 06:56 PM
3

Wrong predator. Probably bears with their cannabis needles shooting up all the time.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 06:54 PM
1

They won't stand for it? What activist country are you from? We're talking about the United States of Apathy here. Nobody who doesn't already will care any more about women dying than men except some extreme feminists. If you don't feel anything when the news reports male military deaths I doubt hearing a different gender will change feelings much.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:10 AM
6

Exactly my original point. She asserts that the appeal of schools will even out as school allocated funding is evened out, but I believe this idea lacks the psychological component that goes along with being human and how advertising affects our society on the whole. You don't eat at McDonald's because they make better food than that local burger shop across the street, you do it because they are a name brand and they got their foot in the proverbial door to your memory. Even if this funding dis…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:47 PM
4

Just after that paragraph she calls for a reduction or elimination of government funding to highly privately funded schools like this so that other schools not as prestigious can be on even footing and appeal students equally as much. It still doesn't address the natural disproportion of professors across the nation as each school will not have an identical faculty and some schools will earn prestige on other merits such as professor quality. Also, defunding ivy league schools would likely lead …
/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:36 PM
14

Critics will say that this would end up with Oxbridge being massively oversubscribed, while post-1992 institutions would close. But even in today’s extremely stratified higher education “market”, Oxbridge is not top of the popularity stakes. In my subject, history, Bristol, Warwick and UCL consistently receive more applications per place than Oxford or Cambridge. Does this suggest low aspiration on the part of today’s young people? Given the excellent education these other institutions offer, I …
/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:09 PM
1

I think we found Charles Manson's soul mate.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:13 PM
14

Exactly. His argument is weak because there is no absolving this act. He just has to do what he is paid to do.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:10 PM
3

And yet, here you are.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:09 PM
8

He isn't obstructing anyone's rights so there is nothing to legitimize. Watching children play in a park is not an illegitimate act. It sounds like you are describing the tension caused when one person stares overly long at another. This is still different than being in a large, outdoor space watching a group. OP sounds like a person who wanted to watch children interact, not a predator. When you are sitting on a bench somewhere watching people is probably more interesting than staring your shoe…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:24 AM
8

"Staring" is not the same thing as "watching". Check this out, it's a real thing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_watching
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:36 AM
3

Oops. I think you clicked the wrong sub by mistake. /r/theredpill is right this way.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:28 AM
2

...commit social suicide... Umm, I hate to break it to you, but you're giving a great example of this yourself.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:25 AM
2

I gotta agree. This could simply be a question of age difference and having things in common worth being friends over. This thinking goes the other way too - Young people shouldn't associate with older people.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:16 AM
18

No.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:56 PM
7

She never reported to the police, he did when he heard he was being called a pedophile online. This would be libel(written) rather than slander(verbal) though.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:33 PM
6

http://youtu.be/l3JuaIg99X0 In this video she shows a document from Yale Women's Studies that view here positions as "dangerous" and "xenophobic" among other things. You can find her lecture on Yale's YT page.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 09:55 PM
1

Why aren't we using the same argument as feminists here? If women get support to speak with priority isn't that sending the message that they are inferior to men and somehow need assistance to be on equal footing? Isn't that the exact viewpoint feminists hate?
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:35 AM
1

/u/IrideTheDirt gives a very good breakdown up above. Go read it.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 05:13 PM
2

Then the obvious problem here is the existence of a shitty law, not that she wasn't charged with a shitty law. I know I certainly do not want my life destroyed by some retarded sexual assault technicality and in the same token I don't want it to happen to anybody else. The issue I see people getting at here is the mentality towards women in this situation and that sexual assault wasn't even considered by the prosecution. I can confidently say that the way this was handled (other than the simple …
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:08 PM
25

You are right, but missing the even larger point. Do we want to build more gender problems and make things worse by calling this sexual assault when it clearly isn't, or not be self-righteous assholes like the people we oppose by not spreading misinformation to push our agenda?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:41 AM
78

No no. The term is "derail the conversation". I see that everywhere and its nonchalant dismissal of any attempt to engage the conversation in any capacity other than what they deem relevant really grinds my gears.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:34 PM
2

While his edit is a far better picture of the situation, I still feel it is ultimately misleading as well. He pulled real statistics for falsely accused, but failed to do so for any other category on this list. He already proved the graph false so why would he keep using its obviously flawed numbers? In short, this is a great opposition to anti-male propaganda, but please don't be posting his "fixed" graph around as verifiable data.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:12 PM
7

Three points at the buzzer.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 07:04 PM
5

They will if enough people insist they do.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:39 PM
-2

Is this a joke about cleaning the foreskin and not the penis? I get it. Very funny. Still technically wrong. The removed foreskin can be placed in a preservative and cleaning is no longer necessary. Easiest of all.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 11:18 AM
-3

I disagree. Something can be easy yet still have an easier method to accomplish said something. Not having to pull back a fold of skin automatically makes cleaning easier. Nuff said.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 11:06 AM
-4

Yes, it is certainly easier to clean. That is a fact. Everything else he said was ignorant. Edit: "Penile problems, such as irritation, inflammation, and infection, are more common in uncircumcised males. It's easier to keep a circumcised penis clean, although uncircumcised boys can learn how to clean beneath the foreskin once the foreskin becomes retractable (usually some time before age 5)." http://www.kidshealth.or/parent/system/surgical/circumcision.html Keep the downvotes coming sheeple. I …
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:43 AM
6

X-Post that shit to r/justiceporn.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:36 PM
78

Why is "to each other" pink and "about each other" blue? Maybe a coincidence, but that seems like a suckerpunch.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 08:55 AM
1

This is why I love this subreddit so much. Almost nowhere else can you get such fine discussion without it devolving into flaming. I mostly agree with you except I believe comments like that should not be viewed as negatively as they are. With the exception of a couple rude comments (the white trash one was particularly idiotic), there was no real ill intent in any of those comments and that is why the reactions bother me. I put this here after reading a bunch of the comments in the mod's post, …
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:52 AM
-1

How do you assign the value of a civil rights issue? I'm curious to know what scale you use to measure the validity of a given problem. Furthermore, where do you draw the line on free speech? Sexually explicit? Swearing? Insults? I am fully aware that this is a minor bump in the road of men's rights, but you are wrong if you think it is a non-issue altogether. The point is the sheer response about pervy creeps shows how many people think of men that way. I, personally, find it unsettling. I agre…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:23 AM
0

Safety > Freedom. I see where this is going...
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:54 AM
-1

Comments like, "you're excused" can arouse a chuckle but is still a clean comment. Just because it was about a half-naked female means it is time to get out the pitchforks and drive off those 'creepy pervs' as some are referring to these posters.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:33 AM
1

If you get into the comments the rights issue is exploding.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:19 AM
-2

The issue is what the mod considers "overly sexual comments". Most of those posts were either compliments or intended to be humorous.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:17 AM
2

To answer your earlier question; the time I was present for one of my "friend's" attempted pickups I observed and heard nothing warranting the title 'bitch'. As for this comment, I agree with you completely. Avoid the dicks and bitches when possible, but give them understanding and benefit of the doubt while avoiding them. They could be having the worst day if their life and are just expressing it poorly.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:27 PM
19

I have known several guys who sincerely thought women were cold, dumb "bitches" if they wouldn't respond positively to their advances. This is just anecdotal, but it does happen.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter