TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TemporaryDolphin Archive

View 1 post and 66 comments by TemporaryDolphin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

No, because they will not only provide 'handicaps' for the girls, they will rig said handicaps up so that women always, or nearly always, win. And they will call it progress.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 08:22 AM
2

Probably. At this point, the SJWs have lied so often that I assume they always are.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 08:18 AM
2

Feminists, in general, don't believe in allowing people to disagree with them in any visible way.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 08:13 AM
3

That's funny, because according to the literally dozens of reddit feminists (all of whom claim to be the overwhelming, if silent, majority), The Duluth Model isn't really a feminist policy.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 08:12 AM
1

What do you suggest, waiting for it to be set-in-stone policy before complaining? How's that going to work out for you? Tactically speaking, it's easier to stop what could be, than it is to change what is. Keep that in mind going forward.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:36 AM
1

It always begins with asking questions. It's best that it ends there, too.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:34 AM
3

In the interest of diversity In my experience, this is how the left always justifies unequal rights. Some people get special privileges 'for the interest of diversity'. On the right, they talk security and betrayal and being stabbed in the back, and it's often very easy these sort that nonsense out as being the rationalizations of a morally diseased mind. But liberals say that they're doing it for diversity, or for 'equality' (as if hobbling one fellow to make him equal to another is wise or eve…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:33 AM
1

that seems immature Feminism for you. Why brother trying to convince someone when you can just poke them in the eye.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:28 AM
-1

The Democrats on this sub don't allow anyone to criticize Democrats. One of many reasons why this sub is mostly a joke.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:25 AM
2

Turf, mostly. They don't think that anyone else should be allowed to talk about gender. Edit: Hell, as proof, just look at the way they downvote anything and everything here that mentions the name of their movement. They are thin-skinned trolls incapable of accepting criticism.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:24 AM
1

Only women count as people to liberals.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:59 AM
2

Fuck off. Nobody will ever use /r/mensrants. If they wanted people to use it, they should have picked a more neutral name.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 11:03 AM
1

But remember! The behavior of your typical on-the-street feminist should never, under any circumstances at all, be held against feminism. These people are such massive fucking hypocrites.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:58 AM
1

But they know this, and don't care. Making it a lie. A 'lie' is not something inherent to the fact being discussed, but how that fact is used by others. It is not a lie that cats are reptiles until one person knowingly says this falsehood to others.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:42 AM
1

I disagree. It is a lie. The fact that this is not true has been covered on national television, in major newspapers and as part of at least one Presidential debate. Anyone still repeating this is not simply mistaken, they are outright lying.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:39 AM
11

A board, which given the names of the board members they spoke of, is either made up entirely of, or dominated by, women, has decided that having a men's club is unacceptable. Despite the never-ending list of women's clubs they have allowed. It says that they have never refused the formation of a club. They denied this club the right to exist explicitly because it isn't feminist.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:35 AM
2

Another option we have discussed is to term all emissions of sperm as a donation and require that would be fathers petition for fatherhood. However, we also see this as greatly unequal. For instance, this is obviously not the only other option. This is bullshit you spouted off to insult and threaten us -- to further increase the already disgusting cultural demeaning of men. This statement, above all else, proves you to be a vicious cunt who is not even remotely interested in a real intellectual …
/r/MensRights12/10/14 11:22 AM
2

Surely you can see how convient that position is when it comes to your own perrogatives. You know what rationalization is, correct? And how prone the human mind is to it? Yet, even when faced with obviously dubious logic which just happens to rebound entirely in your favor, your answer is to further rationalize. I will put this bluntly, because you are clearly not bright enough to think this up for yourself: Whatever it is you really want to do, your brain will always find some way to make it al…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 11:20 AM
0

We do not support paternal financial abortion, we understand that it is completely unfair and wrong for men to have to financially support a child they did not want; however, we cannot deny the rights of a child who had no choice in the matter of their parent's sexual act that led to their procreation. A child should not be made to suffer because their mother and father didn't agree on a contingency plan before a one night stand. But you see nothing wrong with aborting the child. You think they …
/r/MensRights12/10/14 11:16 AM
1

that's kind of the point...enough incidents like that occur in our society that the situation is almost a cliche. there are certainly more incidents of rape than of false accusation. Now you're just a fucking crazy person. Prove this. Meet a realistic threshold of 'almost a cliche'. Because 'cliched' shit happens all of the fucking time. Between 80-90% of all people will experience each and every 'cliche' in their lifetime. So tell me, how many men actually even come across a passed out girl, le…
/r/MensRights09/10/14 10:18 AM
4

No, it's aimed at every man. Because 'that guy' isn't going to give a shit about this poster. But it is meant to guilt, shame and intimidate normal men. You people get off on pissing in men's faces. You hate men, and the idea of making some young college kid feel like shit every day because shitbags like you blame an entire gender -- instead of criminals -- for the bad shit that happens to you. You don't see men putting up posters about their borderline exes who ruined their lives by killing the…
/r/MensRights09/10/14 10:15 AM
1

They should. But it doesn't seem to actually be the case in the real world. People still need to have their noses rubbed into it. Maybe that won't be true in ten years, but it's still true now.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 10:12 AM
1

'They' could have screamed whatever they want. Once a few jury verdicts come back, prosecutors won't go near a case with any sort of indication of consent at all.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 10:06 AM
3

Where do you all get these friends? I have no male feminist friends. Every man I know wishes feminism would die in a fire. I don't even know any men, outside of the more pathetic folks in my family, who would willingly date a feminist.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 09:54 AM
3

I am familiar with this blog. There is not one slightest chance in hell that Lawyers, Guns and Money is on the side of boys. They are a 'War on Women!', ultra-partisan Democratic blog. They despise boys over there. To them -- and this is the real reason this piece got play there -- men are beasts that must be civilized by women, and controlled by society. Fuck SEK and Scott Lemieux.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 09:50 AM
1

There are differences. Women don't go into STEM fields primarily because it doesn't interest them. There are no significant barriers of entry. There are no significant added risks to them (they rarely receive significant punishment even when they do abuse children). They are also highly subsidized, both by the overwhelmingly assistance of the government and private scholarships. Men may not go into education out of choice, or it may be due to a fear of rampant rape hysteria and the threat of unf…
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:16 PM
6

It's pretty obvious that there are two groups at play here. The first downvotes everything on this site. They are relatively few in number, but have the power to hide new posts if they time their actions right. The second are feminists who have set 'alerts' so that they get a private message any time gamergate, or feminism, or Sarkeesian, or Marcotte, gets mentioned here so that they can alert their friends on the IRC channel to downvote brigade.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:57 PM
3

The feminist trolls who camp this site damn sure remember to downvote.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:55 PM
0

Rape is incredibly rare, and it is extremely obvious at this point that every other measure feminists want us to take to combat it leads to either a massive restriction in freedoms, or an unreasonable expectation of men that we be willing to put our lives at risk to protect women we don't even know. The only violent crime rarer than rape, is murder. Violent crime in this country is lower than it has ever been before, and likely ever will be again. You are indeed dreaming of a Utopia if the lowes…
/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:17 AM
2

Well, this submission got brigaded to shit. You are a trolling cunt, /u/the22nitschke. If reddit even so much as pretended to play fair in the application of its rules, your account would be deleted.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 10:57 AM
2

In all fairness, Mark Twain loved to pick fights he didn't give one shit about. He is one of America's first great trolls.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:31 AM
4

I know. It's just more 'Feminism shouldn't be blamed for its followers' actions' nonsense that nobody would ever accept if it came from any other ideology. I'm sure it'll be upvoted by the brigading trolls who camp this sub and downvote every posted, but fuck that.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:19 AM
1

Yeah,. let's ignore the way enforcement is likely to go -- because it's the way it always goes in these matters. And yes, that is a strike against the law itself. If someone crashes your bicycle, you don't give them the keys to your car. And if the state has been proven to persecute one gender with the laws already in place, you do not give it more power to persecute that gender. Shit like this makes it impossible to take you seriously.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:15 AM
1

Cops are the enemy of all good and decent people. It shouldn't be that way, but it is. And until it isn't, we shouldn't pretend otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:13 AM
1

They constant jam sticks in men's eyes, and then wonder why fucking despise them.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:07 AM
1

Historically, disease is the most dangerous thing to humanity. In comparison, other humans barely rate a mention. We have not killed nearly as many of each other as your average self-hating idiot likes to believe. When you compare our tendency toward violence with some mythical race of elves or Vulcans, we look pretty shitty. If you compare it to the rates of violence of any other actual extant carnivore or omnivore on this planet, we look pretty god-damned good.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:06 AM
1

Bullshit. And even if it should be lower, it shouldn't allow a teacher to fuck the students enrolled at his or her school. That is never appropriate. It would always be illegal.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:03 AM
1

Yeah, he'd be right if this was the only case. But there is a long pattern of special pleading, where they make up any BS argument possible to justify giving women a pass. There is no consistency at all to it. They have never once suggested that an male teacher should get a pass for shit like this. And let's be very clear here -- even states with lower ages of consent still make it illegal for teachers or correctional officers to have sex with those under their care. There is no circumstance whe…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:02 AM
2

No, they aren't. This is just false equivalence. Conservatives might impugn people's patriotism sometimes, but they don't generally run around calling people racist or sexist to shut them up. They don't fund organizations to call everyone who disagrees with them a bigot or a terrorist -- they have the occasional talking head who says whacked-out bullshit, but the right doesn't have an SPLC. At this point, the left is about one shade away from where the right was during the red scare of the 50s. …
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:00 AM
2

This makes it impossible to vote for the Democratic party as a man.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:53 AM
0

Yeah... I'm not dying for some other dude's girlfriend. That's not how this works, and I don't get where women got it in their heads that every man on this planet should be willing to lay down his life for her.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:51 AM
1

Oh, if only we lived in a perfect world!!! Grow the fuck up and stop dreaming of a fucking utopia. Deal with the world that actually exists.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:50 AM
1

Yeah, and if a kid taunts a bully and gets punched, the bully should still be punished. But someone has to tell that kid to stop going around, poking bears with sticks.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:49 AM
1

Most don't. But what happens under most circumstances is irrelevant when it comes to individual crimes. Most murders are committed by your loved ones. That doesn't mean I wouldn't be a complete fucking idiot if I went outside to talk to a stranger wearing a ski-mask and waving around a sawed off shotgun. What the fuck would the logic be there? 'Dude wasn't my wife, so I figured I'd be fine!'? That is an idiot's logic. What happens in most circumstances is irrelevant. What can happen in your curr…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:48 AM
1

This is the kind of simplistic thing people say to shut off all debate precisely because they know that it isn't always true. But if that was the case, it wouldn't need to be said. That your type shouts at every possibility makes me doubt whether you believe it. They may not be to blame, but people often make catastrophically stupid mistakes. That dude who got himself stuck in a cavern in 127 hours made a massive number of mistakes that caused him to have to cut off his own arm. But even if the …
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:40 AM
-1

The whole 'you're allowed to beat your wife with sticks no thicker than your thumb' thing is an urban myth created by feminists. Like most of their talking points, it's an outright lie. Virtually every pop-feminist argument is based entirely on lies.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:36 AM
2

Women can stop tossing babies into dumpsters! Or drowning them in bathtubs. OR locking the car doors and driving it into a lake.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:34 AM
2

Common Law marriage, in the US, has been dead for almost 30 years. There are very few states that allow any kind of common law marriage in the US. Those that do require several legal hurdles to qualify. In essence, never file joint taxes with a woman under any circumstances, and it is almost impossible to label you as having entered a 'common law' marriage.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:30 AM
1

neocon ideology Neoconservativism is an ideology solely concerned with American foreign policy. Is reddit really such a bigoted shithole that you think you can just label anything some kind of 'conservatism' (even what is, in this instance, nanny-state liberalism)? Neocon ideology is 100% concerned with foreign policy. This is neoliberalism, which is 100% about making poor people pay for the public services of other poor people (instead of the upper class paying for them). That's what this is --…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:28 AM
0

No, Past accusations of unproven crimes should be inadmissible. FFS, we don't let the accused bring of the accuser's past -- even if he or she has made a dozen proven false rape accusations in the past, in the US, that is completely and utterly inadmissible. No aspect of her past is allowed to be discussed at all, completely gutting the, in effect, the right of the accused to face their accuser, as no effective rebuttal to their accusations can be made in many circumstances. But you want the cou…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:22 AM
1

The Austrian school of economics is closely linked to right-wing movements. It's one of those things that sounds like a crazy rant if you aren't familiar with how the pieces fit into place, but Austrian (a school of economic thought, not economists of a certain nationality) are widely considered to be right-wing lunatics for hire; the economist version of climate change deniers.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:33 AM
1

Yeah, but people only know the alias. That's his brand. His real name is just a name.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:30 AM
1

The University of Chicago is about to get the shit sued out of it, then.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:15 AM
2

Eh, the people on reddit cut Obama too much slack as it is. The man has a 40% approval rating, but here on reddit, he's practically a saint at whose feet no blame can ever be laid.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:13 AM
1

Defending liberalism on reddit. So fucking brave... Meanwhile, if you so much as hint that anything might not be 100% the fault of Republicans, you can expect a lynching.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:11 AM
3

It doesn't matter who owns it, it matters who it's aimed at. The men who work at Lifetime don't dictate programing based on what appeals to themselves, but based on what appeals to women. And, just as it's a problem that women push advertisers to display all men as bumbling bafoons, it's a problem that the kind of woman who watches Lifetime wants to believe that every man (except for the tall, handsome leading types) is a predator.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:09 AM
1

At this point, I feel that this 'argument' is pure trollery -- that feminists say it almost entirely to piss us off, because they hate us a lot more than they could ever care about equality.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:01 AM
1

My take on it is that men and women are different and equality comes from a partnership with equal opportunities. That isn't equality. Equality means that things are actually equal. We have separate words for what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 09:55 AM
1

How would people in the Netherlands like it if they were suddenly forced to do anything the American way? I don't give a flying fuck if you people see a problem with this or not. Culturally, this is not how we do things, and this isn't being changed by a broad cultural consensus -- a corrupt cadre of ideological feminists is instituting this 'change' by fiat. That is inherently immoral.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 07:42 AM
0

Yeah, but Democrats pander to feminists, who hate people like me. So I won't vote for them. Everybody panders, but not everybody panders to bigoted assholes who hate me, personally. No man should vote Democrat. They hate men. We are nothing but ATM machines and whipping boys to the Democratic Party.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 10:04 AM
0

I will never vote for a Democrat again after Obama's decision to focus every last ounce of his political energy on women. What little attention the banksters didn't get, the feminists did. No more Democrats until they can be proven to care as much about men as they do women.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 10:02 AM
0

He is right. So you 'hate' the idea of being effective. You're a fool; a jester. You want to solve a problem, but whine and cry every time people propose the only actual solution.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 09:56 AM
1

He doesn't care. The prerogatives of rich people are too important in his mind.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 09:52 AM
0

Bullshit. If the government can tell companies who they can and cannot hire, than the government can prevent discrimination in terms of scholarships. Because that's what you're fighting for here -- the right to the wealthy to discriminate against men.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 09:52 AM
3

I mean, that's just fucked. Usually, they try to hide their bias a little better than that.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:10 PM
1

Wow, the liberals are rushing in to downvote this as fast as they can...
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter