TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TenspeedGV Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by TenspeedGV on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

He keeps repeating he was tricked by the woman. The translation is fairly poor. If it is true and she did trick him into believing she was on birth control, then what you are doing is called victim blaming. Saying that it's his fault for trusting her implies that it was perfectly acceptable for her to lie to him. He was stupid for a very small portion of one night, and in return she ruined the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:34 AM
13

Link is to an invalid page (.../enddomesticviolanceagainstmen) Here's the proper link: http://www.indiegogo.com/enddomesticviolenceagainstmen
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:20 AM
2

That's why you find out her financial situation before you do anything even semi-permanent. If you live in a common law state or country (I don't know the rules in England), you don't even move in with her because her stuff becomes yours...and that includes her debt, because you can bet she won't stop accruing just because she suddenly has access to a lot more money, legally. Maybe you'd be able to make the case that her intentionally remaining in debt and transferring that debt to you knowingly…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:39 PM
–

You're getting downvoted, and I understand why. I hope you do, as well. Still, I'm giving you an upvote because I think your post needs to be seen. Not because you're right, but because you're wrong and people need to know just how wrong you are. Let me go over the salient points. i think its fair to say that sex makes up a HUGE part of most mens interest in a girl the are dating and such... often its the prrimary reason... not such a bad thing.. since it kept women alive all these years. This i…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 12:19 AM
23

That's kinda funny. In the larger group of friends and acquaintances I have from gaming, every single one of them uses the term without shame or hesitation. The women are among those who use it the most.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 12:28 AM
2

I just started visiting reddit not terribly long ago. That sentiment was expressed in some form or another in one of the threads that drew me to this sub. It resonated very deeply.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:13 AM
3

Most folks I've met or spoken to on the issue (a lot) admit right off the bat that people are not equal. Talent sets, skills, and basic proficiencies vary a lot by gender, race, and upbringing. The thing is, although we're not equal, we all very much deserve a level playing field. This means no preferential treatment for anything at all. Completely level, across the board. Attempts to create a genderless society will fail because they'll always overcorrect for perceived differences and unbalance…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 04:02 AM
27

Bonus points if you present all of this in writing and receive a written response.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:59 PM
5

The issue of getting silenced if you don't believe absolutely everything the majority believes crosses gender boundaries. It's not as prevalent among men, I think, because we accept other avenues for expressing disagreement. But it does come up in Internet discussion, in particular, because those other avenues aren't necessarily available. If you're not quite sure what I'm talking about, look at the posts that get downvoted around here. The vast, VAST majority of them are disruptive and contribu…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:36 PM
1

I thought that might be the case, I was curious if you considered not winning an argument synonymous with failing the argument. So to confirm, you insist that the only way to succeed at an argument is to be factually correct? And the only way you can fail at an argument, then, is to be factually incorrect? It is my assertion that this latter statement is incorrect. It's readily apparent that by appealing to emotion one can easily sway the tide of an argument. In a purely logical arena an opponen…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:47 AM
1

So then what's your definition, if not swaying the hypothetical audience and attaining consensus? It seems to me you're talking about a moral victory. You walk away knowing that you were correct, but the incorrect opinion prevails in the larger arc of the argument and those who might bear witness. If you consider a moral victory to be a true victory, I can see why you might think that being correct is more important than actually presenting a successful argument. Yes, to me you fail an argument …
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:11 AM
1

I guess it really depends on your audience. If you're foaming at the mouth over something the rest of your audience agrees with it really doesn't matter what you do or what your opponent does, you're always going to win. Is that what you're referring to? Because yes I agree, people who believe dogma aren't going to be swayed by rational argument. There was no point in arguing, there was no other way it could end.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:45 AM
1

I am intrigued, it seems as though you disagree. Why? I will absolutely admit that emotion CAN have sway, as long as it remains tightly controlled. Emotional emphasis can be provided to sway listeners, but the argument itself must be able to stand up to scrutiny. The moment you allow emotion to override logic rather than provide emphasis is when you fail the argument.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:40 AM
–

Not sure if I agree with this bailing immediately. I know women who would identify as feminists if asked yet who hold decidedly egalitarian views. I'd say keep asking, find out what she means when she says she's a feminist. Some still do believe in true equality.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 09:36 PM
19

Yes! Just ask. Bring it up in conversation. You don't have to be sneaky about it. Just be up front with the things that matter to you.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 09:29 PM
1

You may be right, but you've lost the ability to communicate in an effective manner. You've stopped appealing to logic, your argument has lost its coherence. You're one step away from beating your opponent over the head in order to prove your point, since you've obviously let your emotion overrule rationality. But beating your opponent over the head (or screaming at them, or insulting them) doesn't prove your point. It just means you've let base human nature overwhelm that logical part of you th…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:55 PM
3

See, you just had to cross the line from just being an idiot into troll country. Have fun on Internet. Continue to fight the good fight.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:07 PM
3

Since when are conventions male-only? I generally only go to one convention a year, PAX, and it's awesome seeing women there. It means that not only are women starting to feel more comfortable as gamers, they're also feeling more comfortable hanging out with other gamers of mixed gender. That can only be positive, we're aiming for true equality after all. If they were demanding anything more than equality that would be one thing, but of those with whom I've spoken about it I've never personally …
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:22 PM
2

This is something I've had to work hard to overcome and it's something my wife and I both watch each other for. It's so prevalent around the Pacific Northwest here that you'd think it's just hardwired. Sometimes we still get into passive-aggressive pissing contests, but they don't last very long at all. Coming right out and saying what we mean is priceless when it comes to keeping things together.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:01 PM
1

Yes, it very much does mean that. The moment they stopped behaving rationally and lost control of themselves, they failed at reasoned argument. This is not to say they can't come back into the argument, but that requires an outright retraction of everything they said after they lost control and an honest, heartfelt apology. If the person they were engaging in debate with accepts, the argument can continue where they left off. This happens constantly among my friends and me, we've known each othe…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 06:52 PM
3

As of now I can't get to openfile.ca, chrome says it can't find the site. Anyone else having this issue?
/r/MensRights10/09/12 06:41 PM
2

It's like somebody that's better at writing than I am took my thoughts and put them here for me.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:14 PM
1

We could've been fighting about any number of things, in the end I don't think either one of us actually cared all that much about what sort of pie it was. We hadn't really figured out how to talk to each other that well so I think the pie was just a convenient excuse to start the ball rolling on all the other stuff we'd been keeping to ourselves in the interest of 'peace'. You know, all that stuff that eventually builds into mutual hatred. Learning to talk about that stuff before it reached the…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 02:48 PM
2

The pies were sort of the last straw in a long string of other arguments that had never quite been resolved. Since then we've become a lot better about actually talking about the thing that's bothering us rather than being passive aggressive or arguing about other things. It's amazing what a difference it makes to be able to actually sit down and have a rational conversation. If we get angry, we simply take a break to cool off and come back when we've calmed down. Learning how to have an argumen…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 02:37 PM
11

At the time I was in Seattle proper. I read a lot of stories or watch news clips online about how the police in this area use excessive force or instigate problems, but I've honestly never had a problem with them. I've watched them respond to situations that bothered me even though I wasn't involved, and they acted with patience and tolerance. I'm sure there are some that don't fit this mold perfectly, all folks have different limits and all that, but I haven't met them.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:28 PM
1

So you don't want to reward those employees who go above and beyond what they're required to do in order to make your business look good? Are you a manager at a big chain?
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:27 PM
23

They were amazing. I still wish they'd been chiffon though!
/r/MensRights09/09/12 06:50 PM
12

But what did he do to deserve it? Keeping her up at night? He had it coming. /s
/r/MensRights09/09/12 01:02 AM
3

I just want to point out one little line that really caught my eye: "The survivor of the assault can feel like he or she is at fault," Ryan said. "As hard as we work to dispel that feeling, it doesn't always work." Looks like Assistant Chief of Police Andrew Ryan has it right here. Let's hope that his acknowledgement that both men and women can be victims of sexual assault has found or is finding its way through his department. We need more police like this man.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:41 AM
11

Anecdotal, but whatever. My wife told me about this...she frequents a message board for women and they were having a discussion about this. There were numerous women who actually had them and felt justified for having them but still voted against candidates based solely on whether or not they were pro-choice. These same women were absolutely unwilling to admit that the circumstances that made their decision okay might apply to someone else. Truly astounding.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:14 PM
4

For me, personally, I feel like a figure of about +/-5% is to be expected as a baseline "everything is fine" standard. 8% is certainly cause for concern. If it gets above 10% I'll really be worried.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:21 AM
7

While I understand there's some pressure, an employee is on the front lines and occasionally needs to be the one who decides what flies and what doesn't. If the employee felt so pressured by a customer to do this, she desperately needs retraining, because she should really be going through her manager before doing anything like that, and if she does it on the instructions of a superior she needs to say so at the moment of confrontation.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:10 AM
8

If they're pretending to be stupid because they think all guys like that sort of thing, maybe they're not pretending very much.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:54 AM
6

This, very much this. By rejecting your child from the outset you'll raise someone who deeply hates you but also wants to impress you. They'll do absolutely anything to get into your good graces, never quite realizing that they have no chance. Your boy grows up up to be weak, emasculated, desperate for female affection but unable to hold on to it when he gets it. The perfect white knight for the feminist cause. The deep irony here is that isn't the sort of man any woman wants to get together wit…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:45 PM
11

Just makes me so very thankful that I met the woman I did. She didn't want a proposal, she didn't want a wedding, she wanted to choose her own ring so that she got exactly the one she wanted. We talked about marriage and decided it was mutually beneficial, at the very least because if something happens to one of us the other will have as much control as legally possible. We were going to just make it a civil marriage, go to the courthouse and get married, but our families intervened and insisted…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:35 PM
-1

Dogma over facts, sensationalism over reality. Same old story, same reason we get marginalized again and again. If we aren't rational we are no better than those who would condemn us just for being men. They point to the times we're irrational and opinionated and say "see, this is why they can't be trusted, this is why we insist they're prone to going overboard and getting angry. They are!!" We MUST be rational, even if the facts do not coincide with our cause. It's the only way we'll find equal…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:19 AM
1

Not sure why people are downvoting you. I'm cut as well. I don't feel particularly strongly about the issue. That said, I won't be getting my son cut. I just don't see any real benefit in this day and age. Perhaps at some point in the past, when standards of hygiene were abysmal and knowledge of transmission vectors for common diseases was limited to superstition and cures generally only found in the "kill it with fire" category, it may have been necessary. It simply isn't necessary any longer. …
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:14 AM
1

The ideologues are one reason among many that I no longer identify myself as an atheist. It's more prevalent than you might think and it's an embarrassment.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter