~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | Ethically sex shouldn’t be considered a fundamental need like food, water and shelter.I see this take a lot and I always think it's so funny, written out like this, because like: Yeah, we know there's a lot of African kids that are starving and miserable, but if we give them plenty of 𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘺 for every meal, are their needs fulfilled? Do they 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 a well-balanced diet with variety and three meals a day? Do they 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 to get access to fresh produce and unprocessed meat? Does it even have to be food? Can we just give them multivitamins and cardboard? For better or worse, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/07/24 03:15 PM |
| 2 | Why is it unreasonable for a woman to want a man who earns the same salary as her or more?Equal pay is also about gender ratios in traditionally high paying roles, I.e the glass ceiling. You should read more feminist literature then you might get a handle on why men get upset by the mixed messaging | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/04/24 05:53 PM |
| 3 | Society looks the other way a lot more with women's toxic behavior in heterosexual relationships than with men'sJust wanted to point out that exhibit A is the mother of all false equivalences | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/04/24 01:44 PM |
| 12 | Why do progressives/feminists rarely object to grooming standards for men?Addressing your last point, I think you'll find that typically professional and social consequences apply to both genders where poor grooming is involved, if this has not been your experience OP I would be interested to know how you've formed this opinion, what industry you're in etc. Coming back to the feminist point, feminine grooming standards are overwhelmingly more developed and oppressive than men's grooming standards, others have pointed out that men are simply expected to get a haircut a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/04/24 01:33 PM |
| 1 | Men, Can you touching a women be 100% platonic?Yes to all (with caveats), but friends respect your boundaries. If you're not comfortable and you've said that and he's kept asking he's not your friend and he doesn't respect you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/23 04:42 AM |
| -2 | If a woman continues to multi-date after going on a date with you, she's not into you.There are plenty of people who view monogamy in different ways. It's not really fair to conflate exclusivity with attraction or affection, particularly if you haven't already made your viewpoint clear. If she continues to want to see you then in my opinion you can accept that as the be all sign that she's in to you. If you lay boundaries down about who she can see and she modifies her behaviour she is into you. Her seeing other people if you haven't even decided what page of the relationship you… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/22 06:54 PM |
| 1 | Q4M: Should men be judged on their history too?The answer here from my perspective is neither gender should be judged on their history, rather who they are today. Practically this isn't true. There's no real way to grade who a person IS without understanding who they WERE. You've touched on a really interesting nerve where I think a lot of men would prefer women do judge men who are more promiscuous based on their history more than they currently do; as they feel this would lead to they themselves becoming more desirable. Through this same v… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/02/22 03:53 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter