~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do themSo civil :D Honestly, I'm on your side for a lot of the issues that are brought up here, I just wish this sub would be more conscientious about it's content. It's like twoxchromosomes and askwomen - I'm a chick and I can't stand those subs, I get a head ache from rolling my eyes constantly. I know it's a common reddit problem, where subs become an echo chamber of some extreme BS opinions... I just... Mens Rights keep popping up on All and I wanna smack some sense into folks. I'm rambling, but th… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 08:28 PM |
| 2 | College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do themI really detest wide-sweeping general statements like "the world sees them as" Agreed, that is a problem, but it is literally what has been said multiple times in this thread: "Male disposability everywhere you turn" (from the post I replied to). I recommend you look up Feminism and the Disposable Male If a worker gets hit and dies, there will only be crickets from the womens side The whole thing just weakens the very valid arguments that the Men's Rights movement does have. Off topic, but anoth… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 07:04 PM |
| 1 | College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do themHow are men forced into these positions? | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 01:48 PM |
| 2 | College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do themSo, you agree that both sexes do not have to fulfill various industries equally? So, when we see stats that more men die in combat and in dangerous jobs - this isn't because the world sees them as disposable, but because they are better able to fulfill those roles? | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 01:34 PM |
| 1 | College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do themYeah, I'm just giving up after this because there seems to be a miscommunication. I'm not referring to the pay gap, I have never mentioned money. If you want me to touch on that, the idea of equal pay has been terrible skewed (and especially in this sub IMO) - what any half intelligent person means by closing the wage gap is that men and women should make the some amount in the same position. If there are two equally qualified, experienced people, they should make the same rate whether they're m… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 01:25 PM |
| 1 | College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do themYeah, I'm just giving up after this because there seems to be a miscommunication. I'm not referring to the pay gap, I have never mentioned money. If you want me to touch on that, the idea of equal pay has been terrible skewed (and especially in this sub IMO) - what any half intelligent person means by closing the wage gap is that men and women should make the some amount in the same position. If there are two equally qualified, experienced people, they should make the same rate whether they're m… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 01:21 PM |
| -1 | College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do themI think people are missing my point here... I completely agree that there should be realistic qualifications for jobs like this - the reality is if your job is to save people and you physically can't do it then you shouldn't be doing that job - that's pretty obvious. My issue is that there are constant gripes about women not wanting these difficult/dirty jobs in equal numbers - where that simply can't happen because most women can't pass the necessary regulations for those positions. So which is… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/17 06:53 PM |
| 1 | College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do themIn those situations, equality just doesn't matter. I agree completely with everything you've said here - my issue is that within the Men's Rights movement there are complaints that go against this logical sentiment. The example I gave is that women want equality but won't do the dirty jobs in equal numbers; but that's a fallacy because even if women apply in equal numbers many of the female applicants won't be able to meet the requirements that we both agree should be in place. I'm just wonderin… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/17 06:48 PM |
| 1 | College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do themThis is where you guys lose me... coming from r/all, since this sub keeps making it there. You complain about men being forced into all of the difficult, dangerous, physically demanding jobs (eg military, construction, etc) and yet when women want to work in that field you're upset that we're limited by our physiology. You complain about labour laws forcing businesses to hire women, when it should be the best person hired for the job... yet again, when it's a job that men are simply better equip… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/17 06:04 PM |
| 1 | Male privilege.it's back to patriarchy once and for all. Doubtful, history is destined to repeat itself. You said yourself, we've been doing this cycle at least since written history :P Placing more women into positions of overt power is therefore unlikely to make any difference. I agreed with you about affirmative action, but there also has to be an understanding that neither sex is going to actively keep the other out of whatever role/position is being questioned. "marvelous" when a woman castrated her cheat… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 07:48 PM |
| 1 | Male privilege.broken down buildings in Detroit Aren't all the building broken down in Detriot? Lol sorry, half joke half not :/ I would agree that many women are policy makers, but men still hold most of the positions that sign off on these things. There has never been a female US president or Canadian prime minister. The Chief Justice is male, and men outweight women in the supreme court lineup. Similarly with the heads of the 20+ cabinets in the US, 7 are women. 25 of the fortune 500 are women (top CEOs). I… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 06:31 PM |
| 1 | Male privilege.I'm glad this went better than expected :) I just hope in general this movement can focus more on benefitting men rather than rallying against women - same thing goes for feminists rallying against men, it simply isn't productive and I think both groups have members that are guilty. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 06:08 PM |
| 1 | Male privilege.Rape shield cases Those are definitely shitty situations and I understand how the law/regulation <sup>?</sup> is causing problems. I feel like it was put in place to stop arguments such as "You've had in excess of 10 partners, you are known to be promiscuous, therefore it's unlikely this occasion was rape when the others were not" - which should rightfully apply to men as well. I guess a revamp is in order. things get out of hand. They can be dealt with by counseling. Agreed, but I also think it… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 05:35 PM |
| 1 | Male privilege.Threads like this that make it to R/all are maddening Understandable. I probably wouldn't be here otherwise, I have read this sub a couple of times out of curiosity, but I'm obviously not subscribed. MGM made illegal Yes, but why not say all genital mutilation should be illegal? mutilated foreskins of baby boys will no longer be used for female beauty products. What on Earth are you referring to?? Conscription made illegal Agreed or female only front line combat brigades This comes back to my po… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 02:07 PM |
| 1 | Male privilege.To be honest, I don't know if either of us will come out of this conversation feeling really great about it haha. Fundamentally, I don't adhere to the "othering" I perceive from your comments. I understand your frustration from people telling you to shut up and sit down, but this is a broader issue that needs to be worked on as humans rather than men or women. I feel like you irritate the issue by instead of trying to elevate men, you want to cut down women. I always thought this illustration wo… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 02:48 AM |
| 1 | Male privilege.This isn't a pissing contest, in no way have I tried to say that one sex is better off than the other. You seem like you have a chip on your shoulder rather than wanting to have a discussion. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 02:17 AM |
| 1 | Male privilege.I never said anything about privilege. I also believe that men should have the right to opt out of pregnancies. That doesn't change the facts that I laid out, that men on average are higher risk takers because it yields a bigger reward (if it works out in favour). Of course it's anecdotal, but I know multiple men who do not have child support, alimony, a family, etc to force them into these jobs - they take these labour intensive jobs because they want to pay their bills comfortably, own a boat … | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 02:03 AM |
| 16 | Male privilege.Higher risk = higher reward. The jobs that men typically die in also pay a lot higher than the jobs women take that aren't in dangerous working conditions. Men are known to be higher risk takers - it's why car insurance is typically higher for men, and also why men are more likely to start a business. We're both free to make the choice. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/17 05:10 PM |
| 9 | Awesome responseI read this in hedonismbot's voice. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/01/17 11:01 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter