TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TestamentaryOtis Archive

View 28 posts and 118 comments by TestamentaryOtis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
88

Social IssuesTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights15/08/18 09:14 PM
45

FeminismTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:05 AM
40

Social IssuesTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:10 AM
38

FeminismTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights30/12/17 10:24 AM
33

Edu./Occu.TestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:37 PM
31

DiscriminationTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights04/01/18 02:06 AM
28

GeneralTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights02/01/18 05:36 AM
11

Anti-MRMTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights02/08/18 08:30 AM
11

GeneralTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:29 AM
10

Social IssuesTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights30/12/17 09:19 PM
8

Social IssuesTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:49 PM
5

TestamentaryOtis/r/MGTOW10/01/18 10:14 PM
5

Social IssuesTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights31/07/18 09:04 AM
4

GeneralTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights03/08/18 04:47 PM
2

GeneralTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:22 PM
2

TestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:05 PM
2

Marriage/ChildrenTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights08/08/18 10:57 AM
2

TestamentaryOtis/r/MGTOW30/12/17 05:56 PM
2

Marriage/ChildrenTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:32 AM
2

TestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:08 PM
1

TestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights06/08/18 09:34 PM
1

Social IssuesTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:13 PM
0

GeneralTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights30/07/18 10:27 AM
0

GeneralTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:13 PM
0

GeneralTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights17/08/18 02:40 PM
0

GeneralTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:22 AM
0

FeminismTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights09/01/18 07:42 PM
0

Anti-MRMTestamentaryOtis/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:59 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Am I the only one with the impression that every single non-feminist study on partner violence has demonstrated that violence is either symmetrical or slightly more perpetrated by women?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:30 PM
2

DSM? What's that?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:11 PM
2

Yes, of course. I remember all this from back when I was a kid. Still, I welcome every survey that goes against mainstream narrative, everything that disproves the idea that only men and boys hit women and girls. I think it's best to post every interesting data here on subreddit, in hope that tomorrow someone runs into it while googling.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:49 PM
6

I remember a teacher in my school telling girls to be more careful when kicking boys because it can possibly have lasting effects. Girls were fond of kicking boys in the nuts when pissed off.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:00 PM
3

I added a few more countries. I got 9 countries so far from every corner of the globe, Western, Eastern, rich, poor, Christian, Muslim, atheist, with high school boys in every single one of them being more often on the receiving end of partner violence.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:58 PM
2

MRA's should be above this sort of behavior but sadly many are not. The anti-immigration stance of many (like I said, understandable on some levels) overrides their commitment to men's rights, and they magically transform into a bunch of white knight simps. This is because MRM has porous borders. It overlaps to a degree with conservatives, libertarians, all sort of anti-feminists and anti-leftists.... On the one hand, this affords the MRAs some mainstream support. I doubt that Red Pill movie wou…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:01 PM
4

WHO turned out to be helpful. Who could have thunk it..
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:31 AM
1

Good point. But, I expect that among less educated, levels of violence will be higher among both men and women. Look up this data as well: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/981dhj/who_global_school_health_survey_among_high_school/
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:21 AM
1

Also, when you guys criticise Buzzfeed or other “news” outlets like them. It’s pretty dumb. They want attention for money, they dont care about their picture. I dont like going after low hanging fruit either.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:46 PM
3

This is why reddit is good. We can use mensrights sub as an online archive.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:25 PM
4

99% upvoted. nice. thx
/r/MensRights16/08/18 09:48 AM
3

Probably the same as in any other study.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 09:47 AM
16

My take on this: whether it's control over women's bodies, the sexualisation of women, the gender pay gap, harassment walking home at night, domestic homicide, or child marriage, it's clear that male privilege is an essential building block of most societies. This is becoming so inane that I am starting to pity these people. I can't even bring myself to hate them anymore.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:27 AM
4

WHO also did some basic surveys on partner violence among high school students around the world. I'll try to find those as well.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 01:18 AM
1

You should make this into a separate topic. This is very interesting. Even in supposedly patriarchal macho countries like Iran, S Africa, Brazil,... there is little difference in relationship violence between men and women.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:29 PM
1

Northwest of Bulgaria then. I thought Romanians were Dacians. Why else would you drive Dacias lol?
/r/MensRights15/08/18 03:51 PM
1

No, haha. I meant the country to the west of Bulgaria.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 03:23 PM
1

West of Bulgaria.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 03:09 PM
2

Do our men are feeling bad because the women work full time? Not really... nope. The western man feels a bit bad because he is not the "provider". Tell me if you ever meet an Eastern European to give a crap about not "providing" for his "princess". Haha. This. I remember some dumb feminist survey about the strength of "traditionalist" values in my country. One of the questions was: "Has your husband tried to prevent you from getting a job in the last 12 months?". Totally detached from reality. N…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:58 PM
2

Lawyers in Eastern Europe are not as well paid as they are in the West. It's a good respectable profession that certainly pays more than average salary, but it doesn't make you rich. Computer programming is pretty much the only thing that reliably gives you a good salary. Men dominate the profession and feminists bitch about it, but that changes nothing, as usual. Haha.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:40 PM
6

I did not cite statistics to prove that men are oppressed here, but simply to point out that Eastern Europe is not Saudi Arabia compared to the West, that percentages are quite similar as far as education, life expectancy, participation in politics, etc are concerned. I agree with most of your points actually. I'll write a longer response later.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 12:11 PM
1

fuck off moron
/r/MensRights12/08/18 10:22 PM
1

You are a fence sitting idiot
/r/MensRights12/08/18 05:42 PM
3

But it's not systemic!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmL2Xna1VdE
/r/MensRights10/08/18 09:06 PM
6

Just tradcons being tradcons.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 10:04 PM
61

How does the Onion manage to be so good and so on-the-money for so long?
/r/MensRights09/08/18 02:31 AM
4

Same thing is happening in Croatia. The problem is that opposition to this Istanbul Convention is not motivated by any concern for men. Instead, it's because Convention includes some parts that relate to gays and trans people. It was the same with VAWA. Some Republicans opposed it, but not because it's sexist and misandric, but because of the following: "The Act's 2012 renewal was opposed by conservative Republicans, who objected to extending the Act's protections to same-sex couples and to prov…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 11:13 AM
11

It's behind paywall, so I don't know the full context. But I suppose this confirms once again that feminists hate WEAK men, not strong and powerful men. Feminism was a rebellion against weak men who were supposedly marrying and therefore dominating the good women who deserved better. So, feminism is just the good old "husband hunt".
/r/MensRights07/08/18 04:57 PM
0

Islam is the closest to Christianity of all religions.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:48 AM
1

Is it that men are "better" in business, or that they are forced to be better in business because that is part of male sexual appeal? I generally hate people in business and leadership. I don't think mensrights should be associating with business elite. Capitalism is no friend of men.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:26 PM
7

There is no "erosion". Economist was always a paper that pandered to tastes of the rich. These days the rich love feminism, and so the obvious follows.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 06:51 AM
1

I am only talking about what people believe in. People today believe that women were always oppressed. That's all I am saying.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 06:27 AM
5

I'm pretty sure that most accusations against Weinstein are nonsense. There are some that are valid and those are probably enough to end his career.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 08:35 PM
2

I purposefully used over-the-top terms like "Oppressed". I could have said disadvantaged or 2nd class or something along those lines. I'm not an SJW. It is absolutely true that 95% of people fully accept that feminist claims of historical oppression of women. Christina Hoff Sommers believes that women were oppressed when she was young, and she is the highest authority on gender relations among US conservatives and right-wingers! What liberals and leftists believe about historical gender relation…
/r/MensRights03/08/18 05:03 PM
1

I remember a talk you gave in which you said that you had a private conversation with a "conservative radio host from Calgary, Alberta" and you disagree about every single gender-related issue. And then there is this, also from Alberta: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/don-braid-feminism-is-cancer-email-from-wildrose-club-puts-alberta-conservatives-on-defensive
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:57 AM
-7

yeah. is that good tho?
/r/MensRights30/07/18 11:16 AM
1

nah, i think you understand
/r/MensRights30/07/18 10:39 AM
1

yes. kay is a conservative
/r/MensRights30/07/18 10:26 AM
1

Jonathan Kay is a conservative.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 11:52 PM
1

Most MRAs think that women are oppressed in South America. So, they should support this.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 08:28 AM
1

So, what do you think will happen once you account for cultural differences?
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:14 PM
-1

Maybe not everyone here knows this. And where's the harm in pointing it out once again, this time with graphs and charts and shit?
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:10 PM
0

deleted reference to unsavory group of people
/r/MensRights09/07/18 01:00 PM
1

Do you know what kind of a paper is Spectator?
/r/MensRights07/07/18 02:12 AM
1

Hahaha. I love how feminists out themselves in the end. You hate shy introvert nerds, admit it, bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/18 12:00 PM
1

Apparently men have a responsibility to hit on women, even though it's one of the riskiest things to do nowadays. That's at least what JebberJabber thinks, in his upvoted post.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:20 PM
1

But JebberJabber thinks MGTOW and TRP are. And he got upvoted. Why do people like him still hang around here?
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:16 PM
1

They weren't allowed to be engineers and scientists. And this was back in 15th century when most men were engineers and scientists (and occasionally astronauts and Hollywood producers). We at MensRights have a long way to go.........
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:30 AM
3

Example of very shallow thinking this article displays: Should women suddenly become stronger than men, they would have to become larger, because bigger bones are needed to support bigger muscles. Such changes would also necessarily be accompanied by an uptick in testosterone and other hormones. If society adhered solely to the laws of nature, then this would probably mean a shift from women to men as primary child caregivers. “We’d have a matriarchal society where females are in charge and male…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:26 AM
2

This is how you do it in Oviedo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HN_237kUaXM
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:10 PM
1

Those two + last metro. Actually, she didn't have that many movies more famous than Belle. Maybe I just hate Bunuel too much so I underestimated the significance of that movie.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 10:41 PM
3

Feminism has for the last few decades been one of the markers of bourgeois status. Feminism is what differentiates upper from lower classes. Isabel Sawhill of the Brookings Institution argues, in “Generation Unbound”, that college-educated men have adapted reasonably well to the feminist revolution but it “seems to have bypassed low-income men”.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 10:25 PM
3

Oscar-nominated Deneuve, 74, is best known internationally for playing a bored housewife who spends her afternoons as a prostitute in Luis Bunuel's classic 1967 film, 'Belle du Jour'. Wow! Does the author of this article know anything about French cinema? 'Belle du Jour' is far from her most famous role.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 10:22 PM
1

Haha, Qulilette is like Reason Magazine. Libertarians who want to be on good terms with mainstream liberals. They can't swerve too much from the righteous path. They have to acknowledge women's victimization, just to stay among the 'beautiful people'. Once you've acknowledged women's victimization and proven yourself to be one of the good guys, then you can voice your opinion.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 06:24 PM
1

This is from a Nigerian paper. It seems that Nigeria is where the West was a few decades ago on the question of DV. Domestic violence is seen as something men do to women. If a woman attacks a man, it must have been justified in some way. The facts, however, are the following: Nigeria doesn't seem to be that different from the West as far as statistics on violence and gender are concerned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender You see that women make about 30% of victims of…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:24 PM
1

Who is that David Gudeman, the other guy who filed?
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:49 AM
18

What I meant is: he didn't even declare himself a conservative, but they were calling him Alt-Right and what not.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 10:47 PM
3

no it's not.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 09:38 PM
2

Did Damore ever declare himself a "conservative"?
/r/MensRights08/01/18 09:15 PM
1

You like Subjunctive_Bots more than Sexbots?
/r/MensRights07/01/18 10:57 PM
1

"But mom, I'm the one that reads," he says. "It doesn't matter," I say. "What your sister wants matters." Is this child abuse perhaps?
/r/MensRights07/01/18 08:06 PM
9

Is there a country where girls are mutilated but boys aren't, FGM but no MGM?
/r/MensRights07/01/18 01:52 AM
2

Now, feminists and their servants in MSM will say that this is because toxic masculinity prevents men from working safer jobs. They should embrace their feminine side and go study nursing. Although I'm not sure how this is gonna go since they have to be better than hundred million women who also want to study nursing.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 06:12 AM
4

Men can't adapt to nursing because it's filled to the brim with women. It's because women still prefer 'feminine' professions. And there are not enough qualified men, because qualified men already went to STEM. So, the only possible way seems to be quotas for men. But, of course, this is unthinkable. So, the only thing that remains is shaming.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 02:21 AM
1

fixed
/r/MensRights06/01/18 02:19 AM
1

Seems to be behind pay wall What can be done? Part of the solution lies in a change in cultural attitudes. Over the past generation, middle-class men have learned that they need to help with child care, and have changed their behaviour. Working-class men need to catch up. Women have learned that they can be surgeons and physicists without losing their femininity. Men need to understand that traditional manual jobs are not coming back, and that they can be nurses or hairdressers without losing th…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:44 PM
8

1.We don't need any feminist heroes Widdecombe's views are still shaped by feminist idea that women were horribly oppressed until yesterday. This idea is what keeps feminism alive. if women were oppressed for thousands and thousands of years (longer than blacks and jews) until yesterday, then it's quite possible that they are still oppressed. 2.Is she aware how much damage was already done by her generation? She says: I’m still a feminist in the 1970s sense Feminists in 1970s were already lying …
/r/MensRights05/01/18 12:44 PM
2

That's the only thing article doesn't want to say. Even though everything leads to that conclusion.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 02:31 AM
5

This is not a screeching manhating harpy feminism that tweets killallmen. This is upper class smug bourgeois feminism that praises Bill Gates for having an equal marriage.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 02:29 AM
1

Scroll down through comments below the article and you will find this: AllyF I'm over here, slowly shaking my head. As others have said, this is a dismal article that has obviously failed to convince even many of the Cif regulars who might be expected to be sympathetic. Count me among them. It looks blatantly obvious to me that Tom Martin went into this course fully intending to pick this fight at the first opportunity and had no other plan. Basically I think Kizbot and Gigolo nailed the key que…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 05:35 PM
1

Actually, the article acknowledges that. But it blames it all on 'old-fashioned macho masculinity that is out of touch with the modern world. ' Hanna Rosin talks of “plastic women”, who adapt deftly to economic and social change, and “cardboard men”, who fail to adapt and are left crumpled. Women are flexible springy liberals, men are stubborn bullheaded conservatives. If men fail, it's because they are trying to be like their grandpas (who used to beat their wives, of course).
/r/MensRights04/01/18 05:20 PM
1

This article is in 'gloating misandry' category. 'End of Men'.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 05:14 PM
1

See, this is a difference between leftists and centrists. True crazy leftist thinks that system is fucked and wants it destroyed. For him or her, Trump's victory was yet another proof how system is fucked. The problem is that the leftist then concluded that we need more feminism, more identity politics, more crazy.... On the other hand, moderate leftists, pseudo-leftists or centrists like Economist magazine or NYTimes, they love the system. For them, Clinton's victory was going to confirm that t…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:13 PM
4

This evil bit also needs its own comment: Couples split up for a variety of reasons, but a common complaint among women who throw out their partners is that the man was not doing his fair share. And here there is a huge class divide. Isabel Sawhill of the Brookings Institution argues, in “Generation Unbound”, that college-educated men have adapted reasonably well to the feminist revolution but it “seems to have bypassed low-income men”. The whole article propagates this idea that feminism is why…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:26 PM
2

Great man
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:17 PM
1

In 1965 fathers did 42 hours of paid work, 4 hours of housework and 2.5 hours of child care each week, according to the Pew Research Centre. Mothers did seven times as much housework as fathers, four times as much child care and one-fifth as much paid work, adding up to 51 hours a week. Overall, men had two extra hours a week to drink highballs and complain about their daughters’ boyfriends.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:58 AM
1

Economist is that centrist elitist socially liberal economically conservative ground. And very very smug. Those people hate Trump the most. True leftists even have some sympathy for Trump's voters. Centrist elitists like Economist magazine are the most complacent and conformist bunch. They love the system, and feminism is a key component of the system.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:36 AM
3

No, it's even more sinister than "man up". Listen to this: "They have not been able to adapt." What she is saying is the following:"They haven't been able to adapt to this wonderful new equal and just world that we have built. They still want their old privilege back." This is why I don't trust the left on men's and boys' issues. (I don't trust the right either).
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:26 AM
2

“They have not been able to adapt. Culturally, we are not telling them that they need to learn and they need to aspire.” Hmm. This sounds awfully like what feminists say about men falling behind in education: "Men aren't aware that their privilege has run out and that they need to work and study hard. Learn that it's not your world anymore, boys!". In view of this, I am still suspicious about her good intentions.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:20 AM
1

It's pretty surreal to see the MRA community doing a complete 180 on a major issue from the early days MRA in early days was essentially Menslib. We don't need that shit anymore. Why are you still here anyway?
/r/MensRights04/01/18 10:58 AM
1

Women who enjoy much greater economic autonomy than their grandmothers did can afford to be correspondingly pickier about spouses, and they are not thrilled by husbands who are just another mouth to feed. Imagine describing a wife as "another mouth to feed". I doubt this would have gone well in those bad old sexist days. Did your grandpa refer to your grandma in this way?
/r/MensRights04/01/18 02:09 AM
5

If they are in any way responsible for any of these items being published: https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/av4jje/the-anatomy-of-a-mens-rights-activist https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/9bkjpz/what-i-learned-spending-a https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/mvknxy/why-an-ottawa-theatre-pulled-a-screening-of-a-mens-rights-documentary https://www.vice.com/sv/article/3bwvqb/oh-no-the-australian-premiere-of-the-red-pill-was-cancelled https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/nneygm/roosh-mens-rights-activi…
/r/MensRights03/01/18 05:36 PM
2

I am not saying that any feminism is good. I am saying that feminism at universities is not really that important. Rather, it is the soft feminism of Democratic Party, of New York Times, actually even of Republican Party that gave us VAWA and all those nightmares in the last 50 years. Feminism is not the problem. Problem is when you google the archive of Economist Magazine and you don't find a single article critical of feminism. And is this because the editorial board of Economist Magazine is m…
/r/MensRights03/01/18 07:51 AM
1

Karen Straughan makes a distinction between ideological feminism and cofeehouse feminism. Ideological feminism is of course more aggressive and man hating but is not realy that important. The problem is not really the feminist theory and what some crazy feminist gender studies professors say. The problem is this feminism extended. People who passed Violence against Women Act, Title IX, all those domestic violence, rape, harassment, alimony legislations and policies, ..... they are usually not 'f…
/r/MensRights03/01/18 07:34 AM
1

Comments below the article are actually quite hostile. Interesting. It seems that the public does not so readily buy the story about victimhood.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 07:17 AM
17

And his conclusion is: "blame sexism"!!! Damn! I told you so: Patriarchy hurts men after all! ........ See, this is why I believe that screeching fat pinkhaired tumblrina feminazi harpies are NOT the problem! No, the real problem is this so-called moderate sleazy mainstream feminism that one sees in NYTimes, WashPo, Economist Magazine,... The problem is this Jeff Guo, who is not pink-haired, not screeching, not fat, who doesn't have a tumblr account, but who will happily regurgitate all the sexi…
/r/MensRights03/01/18 01:39 AM
3

Oh look, that's National Post! A Canadian conservative sensible moderate paper! These are not craaaaazyy leftists and progressives and cultural Marxists and Frankfurt School and screetching tumble feminazi pink haired land whales..... These are the good respectable conservative gentlemen who have no time for crazy feminist ideology. Just vote conservative and they'll save you from the crazy liberal progressive feminists!
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:47 PM
2

You lost 2 employees in the end, if I understood correctly?
/r/MensRights02/01/18 09:11 PM
6

When Friedan was writing her stupid book, women made up about 40% percent of university students (and this was when percentage of educated people was much smaller). And this was one of Top 3 indisputable proofs that women are oppressed, enslaved, downtrodden, second-class citizens, domestic servants and slaves to their husbands. Today, when men make up the same proportion of students (and when education is much more important), this fact doesn't even register as an issue, let alone a proof of op…
/r/MensRights02/01/18 08:56 PM
1

I suppose the label 'male feminist' will be retired after this.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 08:20 PM
3

May they all get cancer Not a toomah!
/r/MensRights02/01/18 04:59 AM
1

The truth is in the past, refined scholarly aristocratic men were the ideal. Of course. It was actually 1960s that destroyed this ideal. Upper class men from the time of the Renaissance up until 1950s who read romantic poetry and played piano to their girlfriends were quite effeminate and quaint compared to today's gym bound businessmen who wouldn't be caught dead reading Shelley and Keats.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 12:50 AM
2

You know what happened? Friedan probably looked at upper class women and lower class men. And she concluded that men were rough and violent, whereas women were dainty and nice. (and she concluded that this was injustice, that men were taught to be violent so that they would dominate, and that women were taught to be nice so that they would be dominate by violent men.) This was bullshit. In 1950s, men from upper classes were quite effeminate and so were the women from those classes. (I mean, we c…
/r/MensRights02/01/18 12:31 AM
1

Well, again, that's the product of modernity, not biblical patriarchy.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 11:35 PM
1

Corporations contributed to worsening the position of women that feminists initiated. In my day women were protected by families being in the same place. Any man who abused his wife would be confronted by his father and mother, his wife’s father and mother, his and her grandparents, his brothers and sisters, his wife’s brothers and sisters, his aunts and uncles, her aunts and uncles, and by the cousins of both.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 07:25 PM
1

Conservatives and liberals fight over who is nicer towards women. Men suffer.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 07:04 PM
1

Well, she did get married. Although she used to beat her husband ('they always project'), whom later she divorced and took his kids ('custody trumps equality'). Did you see how in the second part of the video she talks about how women's lib will bring about the end of the war between the sexes and even the 'true love'? How is that coming along?
/r/MensRights01/01/18 05:43 PM
8

And a history of pandering to feminism.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 09:23 PM
1

Teach women not to rape.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:09 PM
16

This quote is not typical Pinker, who is a staunch gynocentrist and feminist himself. What Pinker wants to convey in this quote is that there is a difference between feminist theory (which, for him, is crazy) and feminist activism (which for him is great). According to Pinker, feminist theory is delusional, but feminist activism has accomplished some great things, like reducing violence, rape, ... However, this is a big mistake (probably conscious on his part). Feminist activism and feminist the…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:31 PM
1

Read 'Better angels of our nature'. Feminist drivel.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:18 PM
1

Another thing that strikes one is that feminist rhetoric (especially the part about 'liberating and helping men') hasn't changed in the last 50+ years (even though men themselves keep changing).
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:13 PM
1

found it on some 'neoreaction' (or whatever they are called) twitter account
/r/MGTOW31/12/17 07:07 PM
1

What about 2nd gen Mia Khalifa on the right?
/r/MGTOW31/12/17 07:06 PM
1

Of course. Japan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia are at least equally traditional, conservative and patriarchal as Afghanistan, but there is almost no violence there because they are rich countries and people don't live in desperate circumstances.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 06:47 PM
0

she doesn't mean this in typical radfem sense ('women are perfect but they don't look it because of millennia of oppression'). she has a more complicated view of things.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:18 AM
1

In other words, metoo is bad because it will eventually hurt women?
/r/MensRights31/12/17 05:27 AM
1

It may be that men in earlier times were tougher and stoic and didn't talk about their feelings. But this is because SOCIETY was more brutal and demanded toughness and stoicism. Both men and women were rougher, more brutal, more violent, with shorter fuse,... For example, black men are the most violent men in USA today (not because of race, but mostly because of poverty and upbringing). But the same is true about black women! Male violence doesn't depend on the level of patriarchy, but simply on…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 09:52 PM
4

yeah, women don't love men the way men love women. that's just reality you have to accept. feminism is probably just an extension of earlier attitudes.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 06:52 PM
-10

Too bad that half of the 'manosphere' is too racist to give a damn about this. edit Maybe I exaggerate. Certainly I don't mean MensRights.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 06:49 PM
4

'Prussian' dick tho.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 10:50 AM
2

Even if feminism started Marxist, there is absolutely nothing Marxist about it anymore. Billionaires love feminism, and feminism loves billionaires.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:13 AM
2

One thing is at least clear and undeniable: Billionaires love feminism. Don't know about Koch bros, but Gates, Buffett, Soros, Zuckerberg, Google boys, Bezos , Slim, Bloomberg ... they obviously love feminism. (Their servants in Economist magazine, FT, Forbes, Fortune also love feminism.) You are right that they are not "right wing". Actually, I think right and left are kinda meaningless now.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:10 AM
8

I am pretty sure that violence against a small man would be seen (everywhere in the world, including the Middle East) as less of a scandal than violence against a member of a female basketball or volleyball or handball team. A woman over 6'5'' would be more protected and sympathized with than a man under 5'8''.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 08:06 PM
2

You are from CAFE Edmonton? Is it just my impression or is there more awareness of MRM in Alberta?
/r/MensRights28/12/17 07:17 PM
3

I remember that panel. He came across as reasonable, mostly because other guests were beyond insane. There was another CBC panel in which Kay toed the feminist line much better. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ghomeshi-verdict-men-1.3509316 This panel, together with this article, actually came after the panel you are referring to, which means that Kay is moving in the wrong direction.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:23 PM
20

That's a pathetic story. On the one hand, of course the woman doesn't "owe them sex" (I hate this dumb phrase). On the other, she knows very well why she was able to manipulate them. All so stupid and messed up. The more I read stories like that, I tend to become convinced that men should undergo some kind of deprogramming from birth consisting of watching razorbladekandy, barbarossa and thinking-ape videos, in order to realize that most women don't really want them (as they are), and that sex i…
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:54 PM
11

I see that on twitter you follow Jonathan Kay who wrote this defamatory article about you: https://thewalrus.ca/dont-call-it-mens-rights/ Why?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter