TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TetraThiaFulvalene Archive

View 0 posts and 623 comments by TetraThiaFulvalene on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Which post are you talking about? Is it the one where he spent 30 minutes every morning in the only bathroom in the house while she walked the dogs and made his breakfast? Because I read that one.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 03:34 PM
1

Are you referring to the thread where he would spend 30 minutes every morning in the only bathroom in the apartment?
/r/MensRights28/05/26 02:02 PM
-22

Nah, the interactive aspect makes it worse. It's way more parasocial and addictive.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 05:27 PM
1

Don't use the word "still" when you're exhibiting things that are two decades old.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 12:34 PM
1

Or they have limited mobility on other ways. What you did wasn't parodying, or was strawmaning. And what they're doing isn't ableism, it's either misandry or just sharing they're experiences depending on whether you believe them or not. You're the one being ableist by assuming that disabled men can't act like men. You also assumed that they claimed to have been overpowered, which none of them claimed. You don't have to be thrown on the floor and raped to have been sexually harassed.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 06:05 AM
0

?? Have you really never seen double posts online?
/r/MensRights16/02/26 05:47 AM
0

Is this your first time on the internet? When you lag your computer can send input but think the transmission failed and try again. If the server doesn't recognize that the received signal are duplicates it will post multiple times. I didn't copy anything I was in an area with poor signal and Reddit told me "unable to post comment" when it had in fact successfully posted.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 02:57 AM
-1

If you can move your arm you can grope someone.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 02:54 AM
-2

And if you can't move your legs you can still harass people
/r/MensRights16/02/26 02:38 AM
-9

Nobody in what you linked claimed to have been harassed by a vegetable. They are claiming to have been harassed by men with disabilities. There is a lot space between able-bodied and can literally only move a single eye. Last one is fucking stupid though.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 02:37 AM
-11

Nobody in what you linked claimed to have been harassed by a vegetable. They are claiming to have been harassed by men with disabilities. There is a lot space between able-bodied and can literally only move a single eye. Last one is fucking stupid though.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 02:25 AM
-8

Nobody in what you linked claimed to have been harassed by a vegetable. They are claiming to have been harassed by men with disabilities. There is a lot space between able-bodied and can literally only move a single eye. Last one is fucking stupid though.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 02:25 AM
-1

I don't really think it's gender. The internet changed structurally in now significant ways. We've centralized into about a dozen big services, instead of being scattered over a thousand small and medium websites. This has had a few effects: a) everybody is on the same platforms which means that the composition matches society, and so will the discourse. b.1) commercialization and advertiser driven moderation. Everything has to be increasingly advertiser friendly, which dictates the tones and to…
/r/MensRights03/02/26 12:55 AM
-11

It was 4 vs 1 and was in favor of the 4.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 03:30 PM
-26

That was really more mismatched team drafting. They wanted a chill streamer team, and for them the goal was to chill and create content. They're in the wrong because they specifically requited him because he's good, and he made it clear that he wanted to compete to win and they agreed, but choosing content over being competitive isn't really a gendered thing.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 12:54 PM
1

I'm asking about what the numbers means and what OP would expect them to be.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 10:57 PM
0

I'm not making anything about women, you are. I just don't think dermatologists, phlebotomists, or radiologist are going to be catching any suicides.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 11:00 PM
-1

I'm a man, I just don't think most specialities will ever catch something due to the nature of the work.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 10:57 PM
-24

Is that on male suicide specifically? How about suicide in general, mental health in general, men's mental health specifically? And what should the number be because I wouldn't necessarily expect it from a lot of specialties.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 04:21 AM
-16

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights03/01/26 09:44 AM
-1

Right, but you're specifically incentivizing it.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 09:03 AM
3

Cool, then file for divorce and claim abuse
/r/MensRights21/12/25 07:26 AM
2

And if you're against it you support forced marriage.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 07:26 AM
19

You're complaining that she isn't in prison yet, but the reason she isn't in prison is because they need to have a trial. And no. Men gets trials too.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 12:09 PM
32

So you think s trial isn't necessary to determine guilt and meter out punishment?
/r/MensRights12/12/25 11:16 AM
1

Then Japan was still the aggressor.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 04:52 AM
1

It was tariffs, not embargos. And tariffs aren't an act of war. Would it be acceptable if Europe and China allied to attack America over Trump's trade policy?
/r/MensRights10/12/25 10:42 PM
1

What did the US do to provoke Japan attacking them? And should America have just accepted that their ports were being bombed and their ships in the Atlantic were being dunked? We're not talking about Iraq. We're talking about world wars.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:14 PM
1

Right, but the US were attack and war declared upon them. Hard to argue that the US didn't enter WW2 because they were attacked. They were basically the last country to join.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 02:32 PM
6

Should there be a baby draft for women then?
/r/MensRights09/12/25 01:53 AM
2

I would say that that is very disproportional
/r/MensRights09/12/25 01:52 AM
-2

What do you mean "WWI and the inevitable WW2 were manufactured, the bases was economical rather than defense."? For whom was it more economical than defensive?
/r/MensRights09/12/25 01:50 AM
-1

Doesn't matter. As the trip leader you're responsible. You demand they gear properly. When things start turning bad you turn back immediately. When you need to call for help, you do so immediately instead of waiting hours. Read the facts of the case. He did EVERYTHING wrong, to the point where it sounds like he straight up wanted her dead. Edit: I can't see your comments or profile unless I open in incognito, so either you got shadow banned or you blocked me. Either way, it's not bad faith becau…
/r/MensRights06/12/25 11:19 PM
-1

But planning and bringing people do. You can be responsible for things and people without being paid, and the notion that you can only be responsible if financially compensated is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 02:04 PM
6

But he told her it was safe, and she trusted him because he was the more experienced climber. If you don't want to be responsible for lesser experienced climbers, don't bring them. Don't just lie to them and tell them it's safe and leave them to die when you're in over your head.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:46 AM
6

If it's professional the bar for negligence is definitely much lower, but people in this thread are completely missing the point. People act like she decided to follow him there, or they happened to meet there which isn't the case. He lead her there. She was only in a dangerous situation because he specifically brought her into it.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:13 AM
14

That's not how mountaineering works. You have an expedition leader and they're responsible for everything including making sure that the people on your expedition are capable enough for the trek. If you can't trust their capabilities you don't bring them.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 07:57 AM
10

If I take you mountaineering, and I know that you're dangerously underprepared and I continue to bring you, and when it becomes apparent that you're dangerously struggling, and I push for us to continue. Am I not responsible for what happens?
/r/MensRights06/12/25 07:34 AM
2

The negligence happened leading up to that. As the leader of the expedition he's responsible for his team members. Allowing her to go while underprepared, and not turning around before getting to that point is negligent.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 06:59 AM
-13

Hvis responsibility isn't due to being the romantic partner, it's due to being the climb organizer. If he felt that their relationship meant that he couldn't enforce safety standards he needed to have cancelled or removed her from the trip.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 04:03 AM
45

Probably. The negligence is that he's an experienced alpanist, and he planned everything and acted as a guide. He allowed her to go on the trip underprepared, and when things for bad and she needed to turn around he needed to have stopped and turned around but he didn't.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 03:23 AM
1

No such thing exists. Defamation is a civil matter and goes through civil court.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 10:38 AM
9

Lol no.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 08:03 AM
3

" She is 26 years younger than I am, but she's not a teenager. She's considerably older than a typical college graduate." So much effort went into not saying the actual numbers......
/r/MensRights11/10/25 04:40 PM
1

Trump was and is fucking awful. The problem with running a "not Trump" campaign was that Trump was 4 years out of office. People didn't remember.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 02:50 AM
1

Kind of, but she only got to run half of a campaign because they tried Biden first. That also meant that she couldn't press Trump on his age since she was okay with running with Biden again.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 02:24 AM
1

They pushed Biden because Biden had already beaten Trump. If you can get a repeat of a match up you've already won, why wouldn't you run it again? Instead of playing scared shit Bidens age they should have been open about him being too old, and then attacked Trump with the fact that he would have been when older at inauguration.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 02:23 AM
7

Money alone won't win you a campaign if your party doesn't help you. The White House never really stood up for her prior to the election and preferred defending Biden instead. They did so because they were going to run Biden until his decline had become too obvious after the primaries. She lost basically half her campaign time including the entire primaries because they decided to run Biden first.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 12:17 AM
2

Take some fucking responsibility for your life man. I'm not saying politics doesn't exist, but 90+% of it is online. Get off your phone, fix the parts of your life that is within your control to fix, and stop trying to date kids.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 06:00 AM
2

I'm a guy. Wanna see my dick? And you don't need to be a chick think someone in their late twenties dating an 18 year old is creepy.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 05:57 AM
1

Bro you're not being judged for pursuing love, you're being judged for pursuing someone in our just out of high school. Just get off social media and you stop seeing most of those attitudes. Get off IG, X, and TikTok. Delete your YouTube account and make a new one and intentionally look up more positive or neutral videos to fix your algorithm. All that gender war BS is just online.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 03:47 AM
2

"Not proven" instead of "not guilty" does kind of sound like "guilty but got away with it". You're innocent until you're found guilty, and if you're not guilty, then you're not guilty.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 04:01 PM
9

Ehh that's about a label rather than beliefs. If people don't follow politics they just great that question as "do you support equality".
/r/MensRights06/09/25 03:58 AM
3

Can't she just file again and day he beat her? The problem isn't that divorce can't be no fault, so removing no fault divorce won't fix anything, but will introduce new problems.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 12:18 AM
10

It's really not a huge part. Just because you can nitpick a few quotes doesn't make it a big part. Work culture wasn't great in the 60s but it looked like it was improving. You could own a home on a single income, today you can barely pay rent on two. If you work seventy hours a week why would you even want a kid? You're not going to spend time with it, so it's just another expense. You say there cannot be a monocausal explanation. Do you think your title fairly represents that view? Of reasons …
/r/MensRights08/08/25 07:53 AM
112

It really didn't. The movement is not big enough to be substantial. 2015 to 2023 is a period with huge increase in cost of living. That combined with Korean work culture being absolutely terrible is a much bigger driver.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 06:58 AM
-2

But do we really need more podcasts of people who don't know the topics they're discussing?
/r/MensRights21/07/25 01:28 PM
17

Maybe don't go on a podcast of you don't know anything about the topic.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 06:51 AM
-10

Last election democrats didn't even really push identity politics, republicans just said they did.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 01:34 AM
2

Or are you comparing American cases to non-American cases? If an American man isn't censored, but a Mexican woman isn't. Do you think the primary difference is the sex?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 12:26 AM
1

Thugs? It's a silly romcom. Even though she shouldn't have hit him, after she hit him, he is still the worse person of the two. It's hard to take the criticism of her serious when what he did was way way worse. It's really hard to take a discussion about how hard things are for men serious, when you base the discussion on a sex offender being on the receiving end of incredibly minor physical violence.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 03:59 AM
1

He got off easy. She should have called the cops, but I'm not upset that she got angry any finding out that she was the victim of a sex crime. He got lucky she hit him.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:04 AM
-5

Then use that example. Don't use a scene where the guy frankly deserved it.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 12:59 AM
-2

Can this discussion be had without needing to start out by saying "well, yeah he sexually assaulted her, but she's in the wrong for being too mad about it"? OP sucks shit. Take down the post and post the same topic with that social experiment video of a woman hitting her boyfriend in public and everybody ignoring it.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 06:19 PM
-2

You got caught lying about being a doctor to creep on naked women during medical exams twice? Because that's what's in the clip.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 06:13 PM
-15

She should have called the cops and what he did should have landed him on the sex offender registry. If I had to choose between the punishment she gave him, and what the law would have rightfully given him, I would have chosen the handbag. OP called it unprovoked, which is a blatant lie. Gyllenhaals character is sex offender that got caught creeping. OP is a ragebaiting sack of vomit and can go gargle a bag of shit. Female violence against men is normalized, but if you can't make that argument w…
/r/MensRights20/06/25 06:12 PM
-3

That or call the cops, yeah
/r/MensRights20/06/25 06:03 PM
-17

We want context. It would be weird to assume that a girl was walking down the hall and thought "hmm, I'm in the mood for violence" and then struck a random stranger.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 03:08 PM
-2

Dude... You are leaving out some SERIOUS context. He was a pharma rep trying to get a doctor to prescribe his new pills (iirc viagra). He was wearing a doctors coat and stayed in the room, while he got a breast exam. He got to see her naked in a compromising position by pretending to be a doctor. He had the beating coming.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 03:06 PM
18

He hasn't given her permission to spend it, so legally it should be his, but boy does telling her to put the money into her account muddy things.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 05:46 AM
1

I don't want anything. I haven't said what I want anywhere. How should " To add insult to injury my ex does not have claim it as income on her taxes." Be interpreted? Would you be happier if she also got taxed? Because that's how I read that. I haven't said which system I wanted, I have only said that taxing the money twice was stupid. In fact, I repeated that multiple times. My only two points were a) don't tax the money twice b) OP has piss poor communication skills, because the way the title …
/r/MensRights22/05/25 10:02 AM
-1

"To add insult to injury my ex does not have claim it as income on her taxes." That implies that you would be happier if she also had to pay tax on it.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 09:47 AM
0

It's not like he wasn't being clear. He is either saying something different from what he means, or he is bitter to the point where he would rather just light the money on fire than hands it over.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 09:11 AM
1

Not all money you receive is an income. You don't pay taxes on taxes on settlements from legal cases either.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:35 AM
-3

And that's reasonable, but but at all how it's phrased in the post.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:33 AM
3

Full alimony has always been a bit weird to me. It's essentially an exchange of monetary service for domestic services, but only one partner is expected to continue holding up their part. It doesn't feel reasonable to expect to continue staying home after the children starts school unless you cook and clean in both houses.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:58 AM
-12

Then it's either phrased really poorly, or a really stupid complaint. Why does he want the money taxed even more?
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:52 AM
-4

Do you want the government to take yet another cut? OP seems upset that he has to pay taxes AND she doesn't. Wanting her to pay taxes INSTEAD makes sense, but OP seems mad that the money isn't double taxed.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:47 AM
-23

I see the issue, I was just correcting his misunderstanding of the tax law
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:32 AM
-43

She doesn't have to claim it because it's already been taxed. Would it be better if the money for taxed twice?
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:10 AM
-1

Hard to know if he actually is underpaid, but if he makes below the average in his field for their area, and isn't willing to look for other work, I can understand being annoyed.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 10:29 AM
2

Use real events. Fiction is fiction and it's stupid to pretend it's not. People read lord of the flies and let it form their opinion of boys as wild savages, even though all cases of similar situations have been the exact opposite of the book.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:37 AM
2

If the increased costs are being used elsewhere I'll agree with OP, but if the money goes back into wildlife and nature management and conservation, then it's not gendered.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 10:24 AM
5

Hunting associated costs likely to mostly affect hunters
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:31 AM
28

Half of the average monthly salary
/r/MensRights14/03/25 08:42 AM
0

What about selling kidneys and livers?
/r/MensRights09/03/25 03:24 PM
-3

Why is it unfair to say that she expects you to do for her what you expect her to do for you? Comparing numbers for pegging and anal doesn't make sense because obviously using fake penises is less common when a real one is available.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 01:07 PM
-1

Tbf IVF is incomparably easier than surrogacy.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:31 AM
2

What responsibility? They're teenagers with two active parents.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 09:36 AM
2

The first paper is not really useful since it's only about heart attacks and not only are heart attack in men a) much better studied. All the early research on heart attacks focused on men, so we understand the symptoms much better. b) the symptoms are much more distinct and recognizable for men i.e. sharp pain in the chest radiating to the left arm. For women the symptoms are more varied and less distinct. c) public awareness campaigns about heart attack first aid has been focused primarily on …
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:32 PM
2

What would that media campaign look like?
/r/MensRights05/02/25 07:17 AM
2

At least I'll get to say I told you so at his funeral. What is an -->A C T I O N A B L E<-- alternative to the campaign? What would have better results without being 1000% more expensive or requiring overhaul of gender perceptions?
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:30 AM
2

Half those things don't affect men's willingness to go to the doctor or ask for help in general, and all of them are waaay out of the scope of a small media campaign. The comment kinda feels like when feminists complain about a small step in the right direction isn't being a complete societal overhaul.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:26 AM
2

You're not telling them that they're stubborn, you're confronting then with the fact that stubbornness kills thousands of men. You can't nag then directly with a campaign because they don't think they have any of the diseases the campaign is about. They'll admit that they're being stubborn, then you show them that stubbornness kills, and either they'll see a doctor or their wives can double down on the nagging from two perspectives now.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 05:30 AM
1

Yeah, "just a weird mole or a funny feeling, but if had those before and it went away".
/r/MensRights05/02/25 04:22 AM
2

It's not at all the same as hysterical. If anything men need to be more hysterical about their health. They're not going because they think nothing is wrong. Men don't think: "it might be cancer, but I'm not going to go". If you tell them "x men sure from melanomas every year", they'll just think "yeah, but that's not what I have". If you tell them about the dangers about a disease, they don't have are they going to do anything about it? The problem is the stubbornness, and they need to be confr…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 04:22 AM
1

It's not hysteric, it's the opposite actually. And the men affected have definitely been told that they are stubborn before, but have not actually been confronted with the fact that thousands of men exactly like them die because of it. But let's flip it. What could be done instead to make men go to the doctor more often?
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:00 AM
0

Men not going to the doctor when they should is a real problem.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 11:58 PM
-1

It's not just therapy, it was about generally going to the doctor. Men will put it off until it's too late.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 11:49 PM
-1

Would you rather live in north or south Korea? It's just a name on the map, right?
/r/MensRights03/02/25 08:17 AM
0

What should he have done instead? Tell Ukraine to be Russian?
/r/MensRights03/02/25 03:25 AM
-5

Doesn't help that Republicans keep electing racists, rapists, and abusers.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 03:23 AM
5

Did Chris brown not beat Rihanna?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 08:11 AM
29

Yeah, I would be surprised if poisoning wasn't already a crime. One "loophole" might have been lying about increasing alcohol content.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 09:35 AM
3

Not just 4B but happiness in general. Women don't like the patriarchal values and men don't like the work culture that results from it.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 10:06 AM
2

How functioning are they if the people living under them don't like them? And women living in Japan get warned about Korea, so Korea is an extreme even for East Asia.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:49 AM
16

Korea has fucked up gender roles and mostly just a fucked up work culture. In Japan and some Asian Americans give their daughters "the Korea talk". Basically advice to never marry men born in Korea because their view on marriage is so different to in Japan or the US.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:03 AM
5

He called liberals "the enemy from within". He mocked a disabled journalist. He has on multiple occasions called veterans losers and suckers. There's an entire wikipedia articles about nicknames Trump has for everybody. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nicknames_used_by_Donald_Trump There is literally nobody, but himself that Trump won't insult.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:10 PM
0

So have Trump campaign. https://x.com/Acyn/status/1818400504768307341?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1818400504768307341%7Ctwgr%5Ed8ce9b8c70741e6d122f010a06b680fbb8e63b6e%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rollingstone.com%2Fpolitics%2Fpolitics-news%2Fjesse-watters-vote-for-women-trans-fox-news-1235071300%2F "voting for a woman transitions you into a woman".
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:43 AM
7

25 months = 750 days. (200 / 750)*60min=16 mins per day of prison served.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 03:17 PM
63

Even if the training is shit it's still possession of narcotics. And how the fuck is two years and three months equal to 200 hours of community service? That's like twenty minutes per day.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 09:34 AM
0

It's discussed as a right, because it's the only procedure that's in consideration of being banned. And I have only discussed it in terms of negative rights, so stop making arguments about it as a positive right. This isn't an ancap group, so stop framing only this issue as that stand point.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 09:04 AM
0

Refusing to get the vaccine before s surgery that requires hospitalization and immunosuppressants is basically the same as refusing the surgery for someone who refuses to do the post-op procedures.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:18 AM
-2

And regarding your last point nobody is forcing random doctors to perform a procedure that's outside your specialty. Or would he allowing doctors to offer the service. I'm saying that people have the right to weed in the sense that it shouldn't be banned and vendors should be allowed to sell it. I really don't know if you guys are actually misunderstanding things this incredibly hard or if you're intentionally being this stupid on purpose. The right to abortion means that clinics are exist and o…
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:12 AM
-10

They're not forcing them they're allowing them. Do people even still take the original oath?
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:29 AM
-5

That's not how it works. Right to face lifts would be the right to pay a consenting practician to perform one. Do you think the right to bear arms means that guns have to be free. Look up the difference between positive and negative rights.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:21 AM
-5

What happens when a doctor refuses to do other types of treatment? And have you considered that some doctors actually want to perform the procedure? Legalizing the procedure and forcing everybody to do it it's not the same. Do you think that legalizing weed means that all stores have to sell it?
/r/MensRights08/10/24 12:38 AM
-19

Is being a doctor a human right? It's not like they would be forcing random people to do it for free, it would be people who chose the job and the specialization, who can quit at any time to do it for compensation. Comparing it to slavery is incredibly dishonest and fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 12:06 AM
5

There was an interesting point about a small group of people getting to essentially gatekeep was is consider common and proper words and expressions, but she just massively overestimates both how popular crossword puzzles are, and how much influence the puzzle maker can try to be without losing their audience due to becoming annoyingly pushy about it.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 03:59 PM
1

Do you view men as straight up being a tier above women? And it wasn't advertised as being an uneven match up. And people don't watch reality TV for rigorous competition. They watch it for drama and to have a source of water cooler gossip. This generated way more drama. You cannot compare reality TV to sports.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 01:20 PM
1

It's the only episode that still has any sort of relevancy, how can you say a blowout didn't create buzz and controversy?
/r/MensRights10/09/24 11:47 PM
1

It doesn't matter if it's the sole reason or not (which I didn't claim it was). It is too important of a factor for anything else to be relevant, and the entire thing should be discarded.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 11:45 PM
0

Why is that unlikely? Why are you assuming that reality TV producers are choosing based on "qualified"? They are choosing based on what gives them best ratings. A massive difference creates controversy, which is what they wanted. Don't look at this like a job interview, because that's not how casting works.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 04:27 PM
1

iirc yeah
/r/MensRights10/09/24 04:09 PM
1

What is the data set I'm using? I'm not making any arguments in any direction at all, because I'm saying the example is faulty and nothing can be derived from it. Anything you think you learned from it, is because it's what you wanted to see.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 02:35 PM
1

Why do you think I'm the one falling for a fallacy, when you're trying to use a faulty data set to show something. Experienced men outperforming inexperienced women cannot show anything other than experience beating inexperience.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 02:11 PM
-4

You don't think that survival experience influences decision making in survival situations?
/r/MensRights10/09/24 01:52 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1fd7jsj/comment/lmexl49/ It started with this comment. Apparently picking contestants with differences in training didn't count as rigging, which I thought it did, but nobody else seems to... Until I proposed picking contestants to guarantee the women would win, and then people can recognize that it's rigging. He says "the women should have had better knowledge", but the women were chosen specifically because they didn't have the knowledge, and the me…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 01:47 PM
0

Right, like the island survival shit didn't prove anything either.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 01:44 PM
2

The point is that if you're allowed to pick the groups, you can prove any group is better than another group at anything. If you have a group of men with survival training, and a group of women with survival training and you test them in survival skills, then you're not proving that men are better at outdoor survival, you're proving that having training in outdoor survival makes you better at outdoor survival. And your friend wouldn't make the cut, because I'm the producer so I choose who's on t…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 01:35 PM
-22

Okay, for the women I choose Serena Williams and Rhonda Rousey, and for the men I go to my local hospital's oncology department and pick whoever.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 11:44 AM
-26

The contestants were selected by the tv producers. It's not rigged, but if you make two groups based on one factor, you should keep all other things as equal as possible, or at least keep important factors equal. There is no a single skill in the world, that I cannot prove women massively superior in, as long as I get to pick the participants. You may think that sounds dishonest, but "they should just have skills I specifically chose them for not having", right?
/r/MensRights10/09/24 10:57 AM
-61

There was a tv show that did a similar men vs women island survival challenge and it came out that most of the men had prior survival training and none of the women did.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 05:47 AM
1

Hospital sounds sus, and while the organ harvesting idea is bullshit, I have zero faith in a presumably narrow scope Mexican drug test. Onset it's too fast and symptoms doesn't fit with just alcohol.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 04:07 PM
1

Sometimes spiking can also just be giving way stronger drinks.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 04:00 PM
14

I don't think it's that deep. There's just no competitive infrastructure for breakdancing in Australia. There were trials with only 15 people and among those people she was one of the few people that could afford to fly to Paris for the Olympics. No structure and no funding means that it's almost guaranteed to send someone uncompetitive.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 06:13 AM
3

It she has testicular cancer, maybe she can levy that into insurance paid bottom surgery.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 03:55 PM
-5

What if you have nowhere to go? Especially if you have kids becoming homeless might be too scary.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:51 AM
-5

But without alimony it would leave to people staying in abusive relationships, and if you only give alimony in case of abuse you get false accusations. A better alternative is to limit the duration it will be given in.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 07:05 AM
-6

On the flip side or would also suck to force people to stay in an abusive relationship because leaving would make them homeless.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:58 AM
44

Nah, they're just contrarians and will latch on to anything they think opposes white heteronormative patriarchy regardless of whether it clashes with their own beliefs.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:00 AM
1

Yeah, but the inclusion of the the specification of the fathers profession suggests that the occupation is becoming less coded.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 04:20 AM
5

If the government was sexist and being called out on it, what would their response be? Any political movement in China that gets any traction will be destroyed under guise of being subversion of the state.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:59 AM
66

Using the male to female ratio as a metric is also stupid because success and failure can give the same result.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 02:38 AM
2

If the father was a lumberjack would the riddle still work as well?
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:56 AM
7

It was obvious that he wanted to gender swap the entire riddle. And the riddle doesn't work because we assume only men are surgeons. The riddle works because we're told the surgeon parent is dead.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:55 AM
4

If I'm being eaten alive I don't really care whether it's out of malice or pragmatism.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:51 AM
1

The idea was that it would stop harassment, which was fine, but if someone was going to send a dick pick, they could still send a dick pick after she says "hi". The idea that it would make women have to initiate was also interesting, but they can just write hello or hey and then the man would have to progress the conversation anyways. The biggest part of this change is that since bumble matches expires after 24 hours, now there's a better chance to actually not miss it.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:33 AM
2

If the parents are miserable it won't be a stable household. It's a lot easier to coparent with someone you don't hate, and it's a lot easier to not hate someone if you don't live with them against your wishes. My parents got divorced when I was 14, and my parents stayed friends because of it. I've never felt I missed it on anything from them, and both me and my sister think they made the right choice.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 10:37 AM
6

50% of marriages end in divorce is not the same as 50% of people get divorced.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 09:25 PM
6

How broadly is sexual contact defined? Because while both are wrong an ass grab and rape should not be grouped together.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 12:59 AM
18

Being a princess was still better than being 99.9% of other people at those times.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 12:44 AM
1

If he's sleeping in a basement or near the source of a low grade leak he would only be affected by long term exposure, which they wouldn't be. And if CO was the reason then they might not have been in his room and were just making fun of him due to sleeping for so long.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 05:50 AM
2

CO, not CO2. Where in the building do you and they sleep? How is the ventilation in your room?
/r/MensRights08/02/24 05:42 AM
5

How you sell something depends on who you're selling to. You can't sell the importance of men's rights to someone that doesn't give a shit about men, without showing how it will directly benefit them. You can't get them to include men by telling them men deserve to be included, only by telling them that if they don't include men, then men will just find someone worse that does. It's the same thing they fucked when trying to sell the importance of renewable energies. They talk about the climate t…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 06:32 AM
0

No, but making a point based on comment on the left is a massive own goal. That comment is fucking stupid and we should be distancing us from it, instead of using it. The fact that there are people in this thread talking about ugly pussies is the exact same thing happening in the left image.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 06:53 AM
5

Entrance exam to what?
/r/MensRights10/01/24 05:23 AM
38

Part of the dating thing about Swift is that so many of her songs are break up songs.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:10 PM
5

Government should look at outcomes of their policy at large not in individual basis. If a government policy leads to an increase in crime, then it's a bad policy, the government can't just say "but we've told people that crime is illegal" and defend the policy. People should on an individual level be responsible for themselves, but policy should be based on a society wide impact.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 04:21 AM
1

So if a rich person drives drunk and smashes into another car killing himself and severely injuring the other motorists, they should have zero recourse and must pay for everything themselves? What about debts? If my mom dies can I just put the house in my name and stop paying the mortgage because the bank can't sue her estate since she's dead?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 01:57 PM
1

You're comparing it to a criminal case, so yeah you implied that it had to be related to a crime. And an individual can't charge anybody else criminally anyways. Keep in mind that by your own logic if a DA chooses to not charge a false accuser you wouldn't be okay with the victim suing for defamation because they hadn't been found guilty.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 01:56 PM
0

Most civil cases are not related to a crime, so I don't know how you want it to be different.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:42 AM
1

Do you think that all your liabilities should just drop away because your dead, or are you mad at this case regardless of him being dead? If I have a house with a mortgage on it, should my children inherit the house without paying off the mortgage?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:41 AM
1

So if a drunk driver has a million dollars in the bank and smashes into another and injures them, but dies on impact himself. Should the drunk driver be able to be sued? Or should the inheritances be paid first, and then the injured person can kick rocks?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:39 AM
1

The claim is as valid or invalid as it was before he died. You do not get out of debts and liabilities by dying, your estate has to settle those. As the administrator of the estate the mother has to do that, which is what the plaintiff is motioning the court for. If his lawyer was the administrator, then the lawyer would be acting as defendant. This is honestly pretty standard.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:20 AM
6

The woman is reportedly requesting Takeoff's mother, Titiana Davenport, step into the defendant role in the case, since she is the acting administrator of his estate. When someone dies all debts and lawsuits has to be settled before inheritances can be given. This is done by the administrator of the estate. The mother is not being sued. He is being sued, and as the administrator of the estate, it's her responsibility to close unsettled matters. If his lawyer was the administrator, would you clai…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:17 AM
-26

You can be liable without being found guilty, civil court after a guilty conviction is just much easier. OJ wasn't found guilty, but he was found liable. This sub would be a lot better if people actually had a clue how the justice system works, and didn't just jump to conclusions based on emotional knee jerk reactions. You guys are almost worse than the feminists.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:08 AM
5

Yeah, people here seems to have no idea how inheritance works. The mom isn't being sued for involvement or responsibility, he's being sued and lawsuits and debts have to be settled from the estate before the inheritance. If the suit was valid when he was alive, then it's still valid.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:16 AM
-36

If he is liable for something, then that money should be paid from his estate before any benefactors.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:13 AM
5

So is there ever any reason to discuss societal issues?
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:52 AM
6

"The facts as they are". You told people to get over it, and deal with it by themselves. And the topic of the thread is that that's women's general approach to men's emotions. You tell men to open up, but still come in to our space and derail the discussion back into us having to deal with it ourselves. Your advice wasn't bad, or was just off topic, tonedeaf and something we already knew.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:42 AM
6

I'm not saying that it isn't good advice on a personal and individual level, but this isn't one person asking for advice this is a discussion of a phenomenon. Should any societal phenomenons affecting people ever be discussed? We can't change it by ourselves, so why ever discuss anything? You also never saw the irony on coming into this thread and telling everybody that they're wrong and need to get over it.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:18 AM
10

Then I'm expunging you from my life, because you have the emotional intelligence of an alligator.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:44 AM
11

Then wouldn't it also make sense to teach women compassion?
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:40 AM
9

So women aren't responsible for how they act? It's men's responsibility to adjust to how women act?
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:18 AM
8

How cam you say that women aren't pushing it on men when women treat men like shit for being emotional.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:08 AM
77

Imagine closing the NBA Hall of fame because there's too many black people.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 04:16 PM
1

It's rare enough that I wouldn't have listed it, but calling it a "policy" was pretty tacky.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 12:40 PM
26

You have to right to your preferences, but man did you list them in the most tasteless way possible.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 08:52 AM
-2

Endurance hunting is different than a marathon. When you run a marathon it's a set distance in a short time as possible, endurance hunting is a set pace as long as possible.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 06:54 AM
1

So if a logger wants to quit after a near miss, his boss should be able to refuse his resignation and force him to work until he actually gets injured?
/r/MensRights28/11/23 08:15 AM
6

How will you do it? Forced birth control or forced abortions?
/r/MensRights18/11/23 11:44 PM
-4

Just because the difference isn't due to discrimination, doesn't mean that it isn't there, and income unsurprisingly affects the ability to buy a home.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 08:33 AM
1

In Nordic countries the weather forecast presenters at actual meteorologists.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 03:29 AM
1

She doesn't need to inform the man if she wants an abort, just if she doesn't want an abort but want the dad to be involved. If she doesn't want to keep the child or is okay being a single parent, then the deadline doesn't matter. If she doesn't know who the father is, does she really want to have a child with him? If she's only keeping the child because a man she doesn't even know would be financially liable to her, then that's fucked up and it's her problem. If the man lied about his name, the…
/r/MensRights13/11/23 01:16 PM
4

The foreskin has biological functions. The procedure is not without risks. Every year multiple boys either get permanent injuries or in some cases die from circumcision related complications. There are no benefits from doing it, it doesn't make it cleaner or less likely to get STD's, it just means that the penis' ability to lubricate itself and protect itself from chaffing is removing. If you wouldn't circumcise your daughter, don't circumcise your son.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 12:43 PM
2

It should be the woman's obligation to inform the man. The man should have somewhere between 1-4 weeks to make his decision and if the decision falls outside of the abortion window, then that's the woman's own fault.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 05:26 AM
26

I think he wants to do someone besides himself.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 11:00 AM
8

That's the dream tho. Kids you are still close to and take part in their lives, but can handle themselves on the daily and enough time and money to do the things you wanna do yourself.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 09:58 AM
10

I don't see much point in staying home after the kids start going to school. Sure there might be some taking kids to and from after school activities, but if Americans stopped being a bunch of fucking pussies and didn't criminalize kids not being supervised 24/7 it wouldn't be an issue. If you have 3 kids and there's a 10 year gap between first birth and last starting in school, going back to work might be a bit awkward but still a good idea.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 09:56 AM
8

If you weren't drinking alcohol and you weren't drugged, then how did you end up in the hospital? And did they test you for alcohol?
/r/MensRights29/10/23 09:03 AM
14

Celebrating specific things women invented kind of undersells how much they actually did invent. You're never going to be able to celebrate every female invention due to lack of time, relevance and interest, but when many inventions are celebrated as specifically female, you get the impression that they're outliers and everything else is invented by men. The goal is showcase things invented by women, but all it really does is enforce the norms of invention being done by men.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 06:28 AM
16

Dude, let it go. You brought a weapon into school and only got detention. If you pursue it further you'll be in more trouble. If you decide to do it again, keep the sock and lock separate, since both items are pretty innocuous on their own.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:58 PM
88

It's also not like women don't deride things men like. The same women that call you misogynist for thinking pumpkin spice latte is basic, thinks that you're a simpleton for like sports, the gym, beer, nascar, fishing, or other male dominated sports. It's the exact same attitude, but it's okay when they do it.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:16 PM
7

Blackpill isn't about what it is, it's about your own perception of it. Blackpill is basically whether you have a gloomy outlook whether you actually have something to be gloomy about.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 12:54 AM
12

They waive their right to trail, by agreeing to arbitration. Arbitration is pretty common as it is much cheaper.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:53 AM
7

I mean what purpose does being married to someone going to jail for 30 years serve? Staying married does nothing to improve her life. It's disloyal, but understandable, that she wants to move on from something she has zero way to impact.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 02:52 PM
-6

Is not wanting to be groped preferential treatment?
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:23 PM
-13

How common was white people gropping black people on the bus?
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:21 PM
1

How can we actually gain political influence if everybody actually opposes us?
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:23 AM
6

If you want to influence people you kinda have to.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:20 PM
1

Depends on who initiates it. If they stipulate silence as part of a settlement it might be okay, but if you suggest being compensated for silence it's blackmail.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 11:08 AM
3

Letting her employer know isn't illegal. But demanding something in return for not letting the employer know is textbook definition of blackmail. The Oxford definition of blackmail is: "the action, treated as a criminal offence, of demanding payment or another benefit from someone in return for not revealing compromising or damaging information about them." Just because you have your lawyer commit a crime, doesn't make it not a crime.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 11:53 AM
40

Don't do anything that resembles blackmail.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 09:24 AM
2

No
/r/MensRights02/09/23 11:51 AM
2

That should start with women being held accountable too, not letting men get away with being shitheads.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 11:36 PM
2

Not on the lips like that.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 05:28 PM
5

What happened to making a mistake and apologizing? But he didn't apologize, he doubled down. He's a piece of shit and needed to go, don't defend him.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:13 PM
5

It's not a nothing burger, and there will always be something that's the last thing. He was a fucking idiot to think that he could do something like this on international television.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:12 PM
2

So is taking a 20000 dollars vacation, but if you do that once divorce is eminent, then it's going to be taken out of your share of the marital assets. It's not about whether gambling is legal or not, it's about what spending behavior is permitted during a divorce.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 01:08 AM
3

But hiding assets isn't. Even if they don't prove the asset hiding, starting to gamble once a divorce is eminent is so stupid and malicious, that the difference will just be weighted against your share, so you won't gain anything. Edit: I just saw your first comment said cash, which does make it harder to prove, but nobody has thousands in cash lying around.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 12:51 AM
21

Do note that this is a crime and if it's discovered you will lose everything.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 10:38 AM
4

I imagine there's less competition in a retirement community than in a company.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 05:58 AM
2

Depends on how much of Britney's money were stolen by her dad. She might honestly be straight up broke.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:03 PM
1

Because it's highly variable over time due to relying on ability to attend tournaments to get norms.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 12:58 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judit\_Polg%C3%A1r
/r/MensRights19/08/23 10:47 AM
1

There's more tournaments and easier travel now. Being youngest gm is a sign of being a prodigy within your generation. Would you say that Fischer being youngest gm at his time doesn't matter because someone beat his record?
/r/MensRights19/08/23 01:40 AM
1

I didn't mean compete within the rules, I mean genuinely compete and not get shit on. Which WNBA player have been remotely close to NBA level?
/r/MensRights19/08/23 01:38 AM
1

It is different because there are actually women who have done well in men's tournaments. There have never been a female basketball or football player that wouldn't have been absolutely smashed in the men's league. If NBA is men's only or open has never changed anything, but women actually participate in men's chess tournament.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:47 AM
1

And chess is different because it actually has de facto open tournaments.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:35 AM
-4

Could you stop pulling problems that don't exist out of your ass? I follow chess and have never seen that even suggested.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:00 AM
0

When you go to an NBA, do you go because you're expecting to get subbed in? Or to watch the top players play? And at chess tournaments there are typically many different tournaments for different ages and different rating brackets.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:58 AM
0

Yeah, nothing inspires young girls like watching men win. And I didn't say there weren't biological differences, I said they weren't the reason for the separate tournaments.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:25 AM
-1

You're the one speculating without proving anything. Sexism is pretty widely acknowledged within the chess community, which you know nothing about. The harassment mostly target younger women, but are you really suggesting that women shouldn't be competing in the tournaments with biggest prize pools because there is sexism against them? That's like saying sexism can't happen in the workplace because not all women are unemployed. I'm not a feminist and I'm saying that sexism is the reason for the …
/r/MensRights18/08/23 05:14 AM
-2

Judit Polgar was top 8, the youngest grandmaster ever and beat several world champions.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 03:50 AM
2

It's not social groups, and it includes people that already left the sport, that have nothing to gain. When men outnumber women 20 to 1 and it's possible to be creepy to multiple people, then it doesn't take many creeps to get all the way around. Do you actively follow the chess scene?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 03:49 AM
-3

Yes, until you join a club and play OTB tournaments, then you have 14 year old girls getting creeped on by grown men. People that don't follow or participate in the chess scene needs to shut the fuck up for a second.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 12:58 AM
-7

The purpose of women's chess is different from other women's sports. It's not due to differences between the sexes, it's a promotional tool to get more women into chess.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 12:55 AM
1

Two reasons. Men outnumber women 20 to 1, so women's tournaments are to promote chess to grid and women. And chess has a massive issue with sexual harassment, basically every woman over 2k rating has a story most have many.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 12:53 AM
-22

Men outnumber women in chess 20:1. I don't really want to hear what people who doesn't play chess thinks about it formats.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 12:50 AM
2

Interesting. Do you have a link?
/r/MensRights14/08/23 04:47 AM
2

You think it's higher in couples where cheating isn't suspected?
/r/MensRights14/08/23 12:49 AM
3

And many are suspicious who ought not to. It goes both ways. 30% is the highest number you'll ever get though it's still incredible.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 06:31 PM
-8

Yes, And the majority of those tested were still faithful. The rate of false paternity is going to be lower for all other groups.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 06:29 PM
252

It's a crazy number, but it's for tested cases, so it's when there already is a suspicion.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 08:59 AM
1

Europe don't have illegal immigrants the way the US does. They have refugees and people pretending to be refugees.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 12:31 AM
-13

And you will find that some judges are hard on women, but that doesn't mean that there isn't a systemic issue.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:04 PM
-11

You would agree that there is a stereotype that women know less about cars, right? Then mechanics trying to scam people are going to be more likely to try with women, especially young women. ​ And why are we becoming like the feminists, who will adamantly deny or talk around any sort of sexism happening to men. You literally sound like them trying to deny something that is very widely known to predominantly affect women.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:19 PM
10

Maybe she's playing the long con by specifically setting herself up as opposition to the scammers to gain trust and rip them off even harder.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 02:35 PM
8

A lot of mechanics will genuinely rip women off if they don't think they know anything about cars.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 02:08 PM
4

So does idiot, moron and imbecile.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 08:37 AM
5

Going the legal route is 100% not an option. OP is a foreigner in China. She will ALWAYS win legal disputes.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:04 PM
13

If that's the law then the judge has the follow it. The problem is the law.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 02:00 AM
8

When you're in atheism groups, you'll also be likely to be more outspoken about topics that are opposing religions. They probably would have still supported feminism and the LGBT movement, but less so than now, because those are ways for them to conduct their atheist activism.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 07:33 AM
12

Supply per worker is almost infinite, and cost of entry is nothing, so it's extremely competitive. The average only fans content creator makes like 100 dollars a month. To actually get rich toy have to be really lucky and really skilled at marketing.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 07:23 AM
9

Yeah, it doesn't really mean anything. It's without prejudice, so they can just refile on the right court.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 11:15 PM
32

Leaches at least cured hemochromatosis.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 03:02 AM
29

So father's day and mother's day got exactly the same thing?
/r/MensRights18/06/23 04:53 AM
2

Your claim, your burden of proof. If it only took you 5 seconds to prove your case, then you'd have to really be a lazy piece of shit to mind doing it.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 11:11 AM
3

Opportunity to do what? It's like men were out having excited educations and careers like in modern times. They were working in the factories and the mines.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 01:05 PM
2

It doesn't really explain why women initiate divorce, since they don't have needs that aren't being met.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 03:07 AM
1

I've never met anyone with leukemia, just click the link. Typically it's complications and infections from the bleeding. Permanent nerve damage can also happen if they cut the penis itself.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 02:24 PM
1

What's not true? https://www.cirp.org/library/death/
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:27 PM
11

There's not an advantage. However, sometimes they botch it resulting in permanent damage or even death.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 12:03 AM
1

The reason for that is actually that men serve harder so there are more aces. To make the matches closer time wise, the men play an extra set. Think the mens matches are still longer, but each set is shorter.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 06:01 AM
2

It's not 48 hours of constant working it includes just sleeping together. And would you trade your job for one that was just 4 48 hour shifts a year with 355 days days off? I think most people would.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 01:25 AM
2

It's 2 months' good salary done in two days.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 11:20 PM
31

That's still an insane hourly rate for a 48 hour job.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:05 PM
9

It's not an indication of that if he didn't actually get fired due to allegations. All it'san indication of its us having a moment of the same victim eagerness that feminists usually have.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:42 AM
4

Yeah, they're being closed for legal reasons and they're now trying to double down by eliminating all protection they had. Lol get absolutely fucked.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 09:48 PM
2

That's kinda the angle they have to take, feminists are not gonna care if men don't like what they're doing.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 09:50 PM
4

Yes until they get it and then they don't do it. It's legal in NYC and there's like a dozen people actually doing it.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 05:12 PM
3

Do you want immediate peace? Just get the test and things will go back to normal.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:46 PM
4

Yeah, something being 1 in 100k, means that it should apply to thousands of Americans.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 08:29 PM
3

pretax income?
/r/MensRights02/02/23 12:00 AM
0

Your work place policies don't superceed the law, and you didn't give the okay, you bluffed him. I don't care what you do, just accept that if you continue you might run into legal trouble.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 12:23 PM
0

I don't give a shit about your ideas about hiring, they're not relevant. I was simply pointing out that you very likely broke the law, and the fact that you unknowingly managed to bluff your way out of it, was just luck. I was giving you a heads up, so you don't actually get sued in the future.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 01:03 AM
0

He walked away because he didn't know the law. Law beats logic any day, and your attitude doesn't mean shit of somebody actually gets a lawyer.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 12:30 PM
0

right, but you still ignored that you pretty likely broke labor law. Legally it doesn't matter that she lied, because depending on where you are even asking was likely illegal. It's like telling the cops that you bought bad coke.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 01:11 AM
4

Why'd you hire her if you were certain she was pregnant? And I'm pretty sure a lot of places you aren't even allowed to ask whether someone is pregnant during the interview, let alone fire someone for being pregnant.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 05:09 PM
39

If I was gay I would have fucked you, because you look like a man.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 12:09 PM
-2

Did you read the second article you linked? Because it's not what you describe it as after the first paragraph, and most of the issues discussed are present in men's football too.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:10 AM
39

Psst psst Scihub
/r/MensRights24/12/22 10:09 PM
42

Well, it should have been two jokes.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:53 AM
5

Why should they be paid more if people don't want to watch them play? Should a musician be paid more if nobody wants to listen to their music?
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:16 AM
1

The worst part of Malmö, is still better than parts of pretty much every large American city. And not all of Scandinavia is Malmö, though I also found Japan and Singapore better in this regard. How do all of those countries compare for freedom of speech? I know East Asia is significantly worse, don't know much about Eastern Europe though. Denmark is pretty easy to get rich in, but the tax rate makes it hard to get really rich. But it's hard to fail and very easy to be comfortable.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:41 AM
2

Dude I love in one and booke og that is true. Say 40 instead of 50% and I'll agree. We have some of the lowest crime rates in the world and even the worst parts of our cities are safer than any American cities. We have strong protection of freedom of speech. If you actually any of those things besides taxes are better in East Asia or Eastern Europe, you have no idea about any of those places. Are you American? Because it seems you know nothing about Europe or Asia.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:08 AM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 03:46 AM
12

Lol it's not equal pretty much anywhere, men are almost always victims of assault and murder 2-4 times as often.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 11:19 PM
7

Why does the US have much much much higher recidivism rates than European countries than treats prisoners better?
/r/MensRights14/11/22 01:26 PM
2

"McNamara's morons" actually lowered the fighting ability of the armed forces.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 08:58 PM
1

1:100 still means 30 million dicks, so it should probably still be okay as long as you track it.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 10:05 AM
10

They literally made it their policy to not promote them.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 10:40 AM
7

Parents can fund the lawyers.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 09:34 AM
9

Yeah, it's basically just averaging your incomes.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 12:56 PM
1

Tell the guy or the bartender to drink the drink.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 05:39 PM
8

I meant don't represent yourself. Get a lawyer.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:54 PM
2

Don't defend yourself
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:52 PM
1

Are you stupid?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 05:57 AM
1

No but sending a picture of one is.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 06:13 AM
292

"Student lawyer friend" Not yet full lawyer Not specialised in family law Not unbiased Don't attribute any value to get opinion, she is barely above a layman.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 11:38 AM
1

Then what happens? Russia takes over Ukraine and all the Ukrainians go where?
/r/MensRights28/09/22 08:51 AM
-7

If you fight fir your country there's at least a chance that you'll get to enjoy it.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 12:12 PM
-5

Considering the evidence of torture by Russians, I'd taking my chances in the Ukrainian army. They might not respect me, but at least they aren't attempting an active genocide against me.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 12:02 PM
-22

You'd rather die fighting your own country than fight the invaders?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 07:04 AM
1

OP
/r/MensRights12/09/22 04:36 PM
1

If everybody rejects you, you're the problem. OP seem to think it's due to some woke liberals, but if everybody rejects him, the problem is on his end.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 04:23 PM
0

If you go to his profile he also complains that women only match the top 10% on tinder. Which is it?
/r/MensRights12/09/22 04:20 PM
22

Show me an article of a woman defending two men from anything?
/r/MensRights11/09/22 07:09 AM
1

And you're responsible for your own feelings.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:53 AM
1

Abolish all laws pertaining to violence and just substitute it with "lmao had it coming".
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:34 AM
0

I didn't consent to you being this stupid. You're causing me a headache and you should be head legally responsible for it.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:33 AM
-1

You're responsible for your own feelings. Your reaction is your responsibility, not others. You don't get to decide what their rights are, based on how it makes you feel.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:28 AM
3

Yes. Otherwise you can throw away any sense of right to a fair trial or proportional punishment and every real or perceived, proven or unproven offense becomes a sentence to be beaten. There will be no rights, only feelings.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:26 AM
1

Sorry you got hurt, but you don't get to decide what two consenting adults do together.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:42 PM
1

They lose their relationship and and social reputation. Why does the government have to be involved with every part of our lives?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:24 PM
2

You think the world would be a better place if we based our legal system on our moments of deepest anger?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 10:46 PM
2

Sorry you got your feelings hurt, but that would be the biggest legal cluster fuck ever. Both practically, but outside a relationship based on some sort of contract, it's also just a massive violation of several fundamental legal principles.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 10:45 PM
6

So if I suspect my partner cheated on me, does the law cease to apply? Am I allowed to flay them alive?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:50 PM
4

Fucking hell, imagine calling her out and then being wrong about it. Especially when she's going through a rough patch.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 04:06 PM
12

Yeah, the two situations are not at all comparable. Boris broke the law, but she's for some reason not allowed to have a private party because electricity prices have gone up? OP, do better.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:06 PM
7

You can be a skilled motorist and an absolute bellend. The test takes less than an hour, so having a temper doesn't really stop you from passing. It's the same way young men are overrepresented among reckless drivers, but that doesn't mean they couldn't pass the driver's exam, because obviously they're not going 40% over the limit with a cop in the car.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:03 PM
1

"Also, there should be more consideration on how hormones affect driving." "Tasks involving co-ordination and dexterity are more difficult when oestrogen is low and this can impact things like driving." ​ This is a shit argument, because if women are worse drivers, then they shouldn't be driving. A drivers license serves a purpose and the purpose isn't to drive gender equality. Blind people are also worse drivers through no fault of their own, but it's quite obvious that nobody is going to argue…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:00 PM
37

This is why men don't like romcoms. Women see the romance, men see the work.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 10:30 PM
9

If you assume women did on average cost the insurance company more in health healthcare spending, would it be fair if they were also charged more?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:19 PM
3

You don't really need to know anything. Just assume that it's strictly private and women on average have higher health healthcare costs.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:16 PM
6

I wasn't talking about the medical system, I was talking specifically about insurance companies. A strictly private health insurance company.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:29 PM
3

Why should an insurance company be forced to operate on a loss for certain customers?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:36 AM
7

Why does that matter? It's not the responsibility of the insurance companies either way.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 10:22 AM
10

But women can't be charged more for health insurance even though they statistically cost the insurance companies more money?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 10:07 AM
2

Haha I had the same crush OP. Lene Nystrøm is a hottie.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 12:49 AM
5

Which specific medical issues do you think men have that don't appropriately fall under any current specialty? Women's reproductive health issues tend to be a bit more complicated than men's.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:48 PM
2

Don't be cruel for the sake of being cruel even if you think that what you are saying is true.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:44 PM
2

1% of men had it pretty decent and everyone else had a horrible time. Until the industrial revolution everything sucked for everyone all the time.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:38 AM
31

btw when you feel a condom there should be a bit of air inside the packaging, so if you can push it completely flat without resistance the packaging is broken.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:57 PM
-1

It's not really a new language, it's the same language but you view them as the gender they identify with.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 10:33 AM
1

The beneficial ones are extremely niche, and while some are dependant on the environment, most aren't. Diseases like Huntingtons, cystic fibrosis, various immunorelated ilnesses, etc. don't really have environments where they aren't hugely problematic.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 01:37 AM
2

Men Beat the Total and female rates, that's saying something. That's not saying something. The total rate(so per capita) is the average of men and women, so it's mathematically impossible to beat one but not the other.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 11:25 AM
4

Because men and women aren't identical, so their choices aren't identical. If there was zero sexism and everybody had equal opportunity to do anything they wanted, you still wouldn't expect to see parity in all fields.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:39 AM
7

Lol regulation is how the whole shitshow started, get the government completely out of the loans.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 08:06 PM
1

I would imagine that they get these things through their clubs. Playing on the national team isn't a full time gig.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 03:57 PM
5

Overall okay video, but it does seem like they're messing up in terms a bit. Towards the end she says "if Amber Heard is found legally guilty". That's not an option, it's a civil case. She can't be guilty, she can only be liable.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:33 AM
2

God you sound like a feminist. You completely disregard substance or nuance in favor of immediate dismissal towards anything you deem even remotely aligning with "the enemy".
/r/MensRights16/05/22 11:01 AM
1

That could be said for any economic system, most of them even more so than capitalism.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:59 AM
-1

Consent is consent. If he was willing to consent, she should have just asked. She was being secretive specifically because she valued her own sexual pleasure over her partners consent. You don't get to decide what your partner/victim needs to consent to, it's not a hard fucking concept.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 07:26 PM
3

Or a roofie since she cares more about her pleasure than his consent.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:25 PM
-15

A personal day that can be called in on the day with no questions asked seems like it would end up in a mess.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:47 AM
7

Why is it called the Nordic model? It's legal to buy sex in Denmark. It's also legal to advertise the sale of sexual services. The only illegal thing is to make money on someone else selling sex.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 01:02 PM
41

Whatever you think the ideal end goal of feminism is. Swap the genders, and if you think that it would be a misogynist opinion for us to hold, reconsider your own position, if not then that's our position.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 10:44 PM
32

They also shoot his movies in a way that doesn't show his height.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 08:12 AM
1

We were on a break!
/r/MensRights28/03/22 06:02 AM
2

Woosh
/r/MensRights28/03/22 05:59 AM
20

The side effects besides those of the pill was a suicide and like 3 pregnancies along with some participants being very slow to or never regaining fertility. The two are not comparable.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 05:38 AM
20

The stupid part is that since urinals are so fast, the women's room could have been given slightly more space, but rather than going for mutually beneficial equity, they went for equally of equally terrible outcomes.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:22 AM
4

Hard to prove that it's due to a single event 7 years ago without any tests before or after the event, but theoretically you could sue for damages if you can prove that's it more likely than not, that she caused permanent damage.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 11:34 AM
14

Yeah, why not have a neutral company and just have the girl stuff as an extra addition.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 05:29 PM
1

It only matters if the countries respect it, which I wouldn't be surprised if Russia didn't. For example Japan doesn't give a fuck about it.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 08:21 AM
12

It's not about the penis, it's the angle of the hips.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 12:17 AM
42

Represent in what court? A Turkish Court can't do shit in Russia.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 12:14 AM
2

She's mentally handicapped with an iq of 70.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 11:17 AM
2

It's less that she's a woman and more that she mentality handicapped.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 11:15 AM
2

So she's not a teacher and he's not a student and both are over 18? Don't think this is the hill to die on lmao.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:21 PM
56

It seems like it was mostly the ex boyfriends, who she had confided in, that she was directly upset with, which is fair. If you confide in someone that you have a problem and they use that against you, that's fucked up.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 11:26 AM
6

Why can anyone champion the rights of black people when most crimes against black people are committed by other black people?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 07:22 AM
5

You still don't get to decide to press charges. The police may choose to build a case, and the district attorney may choose to pursue it.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:45 AM
2

Because what you meant could have been explained in a concise and unambiguous manner, but you left it open to interpretation, and when confusion arose you doubled down and never explained exactly what you meant.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:27 PM
1

We agree, but your communication was terrible.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:44 PM
-8

Yeah, the "not impress" thing definitely sounded like you didn't like it. It's similar to when someone says "not a good thing" and it means that it's bad, if they meant it was neither a good or bad thing, they would have stated that.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 05:31 PM
6

It would be cut and dry if he didn't have a hostage, which complicates things.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:13 PM
38

It will be hard to argue self defense when he left and came back. If you willingly returned, then you didn't fear for your life.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 08:45 AM
35

She wanted him dead.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 08:44 AM
2

No, I get it from actually following the chess scene and news.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:00 PM
-7

Online or in chess? Because if you think the problem was only trash talk, then you know nothing about chess.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:37 AM
-5

It doesn't stop them from beating them, but it stops them from getting the best opportunities. It can affect whether you get the best coaches or not, and when you're underage and you get told how someone wants to fuck you at a tournament, maybe you don't want to all in on being competitive. Sexism isn't the reason there's a massive gender gap in these things, but you know absolutely nothing about the environments, if you think it doesn't have a serious effect in those circles.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:33 AM
-18

It's off by a single person, fly fucking quotas doesn't actually disprove anything. For the counterexample; besides one transwoman, I can't think of a single female LCS/LEC/LPL/LCK player in league of legends, and I've followed the game for nearly a decade.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:14 AM
-26

That doesn't mean that sexism can't exist in those places, and it doesn't stop women from going into those fields. For sexism in Chess you can listen to some of the stories told by Anna Cramling and Alexandra Botez. In esport a lot of the top leagues are franchised, so sexism can potentially be a hard gate.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:07 AM
1

Also that username
/r/MensRights12/12/21 09:12 PM
1

I didn't say what you said, I said what I said.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:15 AM
3

"She's just the biological carrier of the foetus until birth. On what grounds does she have to abort the foetus without the biological fathers permission?"
/r/MensRights05/12/21 04:26 PM
0

The concept of forcing a woman to carry the baby to term or paper abortions? Because I support the latter but the first one is absolutely psychotic.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 08:24 AM
2

Because it has no effect on them.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 08:22 AM
3

I didn't say there shouldn't be an option for legal abortions. I said that men shouldn't to allowed to decide that a woman would be forced to go through with the pregnancy.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 08:21 AM
2

How do you feel about women having a say in whether male circumcision is legal?
/r/MensRights04/12/21 11:43 PM
-6

" She's just the biological carrier of the foetus until birth" ​ Dumbest thing I've ever heard. You don't get to make decisions about her body, just because the baby is partly yours.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 11:41 PM
18

Dudesteads.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 10:02 PM
26

At my university(in Scandinavia) the doors are real doors and the bathrooms are actual rooms with walls.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 03:23 PM
22

It was a response to some smoothbrain CNN journo misunderstanding and interpreting a statement as WFP saying that world hunger could be solved for 6 billion(which for a global problem is nothing), so Elon just said "show me how, and I'll pay it".
/r/MensRights02/11/21 05:43 PM
9

Yeah, people taking two to not risk twenty is a huge problem, because even if you are guilty and even if you have the resources to fight it, it's massively risky.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 07:38 PM
74

Because something like only 5 percent of criminal cases go to trial. If there is never any incentive to plead guilty, then the court system will see a workload increase of 1000%
/r/MensRights01/11/21 05:31 PM
3

That doesn't mean that mean were only involved in 31.9%, since an accident can involve 2 parties. It also doesn't discriminate severity of accidents.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 10:11 PM
6

Women have many cheap accidents, men have fewer but more expensive ones. I'd rather have three fender benders than a total.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 10:09 PM
12

I would imagine that a lot of hormone research for women were done in conjecture with birth control products. Basically there are dozens of times more women using those products than men.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 12:05 PM
148

Just block their numbers. Teenagers being immature shouldn't really be a surprise to anyone.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 08:08 AM
7

Reproductive coercion
/r/MensRights18/10/21 10:54 AM
10

Someone being accused of something is an event in itself. The event they are reporting on it's the arrest or charging of her.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 07:05 AM
56

Or her grandfathers died in war, or from work place accidents or hazards, or maybe just lived far enough away to not be a consistent part of their lives.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 05:55 PM
2

What title? The whole post is shoot abuse of boys and only the last line is about girls.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 07:58 AM
26

It's also just throwing Illinois men under the bus. Why the fuck should Texas voters give a crap about what law passes in IL.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:03 PM
1

The estimate from basically all sources from FBI to academics seem to be around 2-6%. And you contradict yourself. You say that nobody would do it, but then give the reason somebody does it.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 04:35 PM
3

You were contesting the 2% number which isn't the ratio of false accusations to actual rapes, it's the ratio of false accusations to total accusations, which is 2% at absolute minimum. When you say "being accused of accusing" I assume you mean being convicted falsely accusing someone, which is nearly impossible if you actually go through the police. To be convicted of making a false accusation, there not only has to be no evidence of rape, there has to be evidence of knowingly making a false acc…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 03:53 PM
6

The amount that is unreported doesn't affect the likelihood of a reported event being true or false. And the thrown out cases would be included among the insufficient evidence statistics.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 03:35 PM
5

It's that two percent of rape accusations are proven to be false, don't remember how many end in a guilty verdict, but it's not a huge number either. The remaining majority doesn't have sufficient evidence to prove either way, so the 2% of accusations being false is the absolute minimum.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 03:17 PM
1

We were lied to, but you can't document any specific personal damages.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 03:57 PM
1

If she lied and told the conference that she was a victim and they gave her the speaking job, then technically they were defrauded, not Depp.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 03:33 PM
6

It's either filing false report, perjury, libel, slander or defamation depending on how, where and to who you make the false accusation. It isn't fraud unless you use the accusation to gain some other benefit from a third party.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 09:33 AM
23

Yup. I want equal rights, not equally few rights.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 05:21 PM
4

Race still wasn't related in any way, so why even mention it?
/r/MensRights06/09/21 10:27 PM
2

Depends on what she has said. If she has made references or indications that rent is due to a third party, then you could argue fraudulent action.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 10:18 PM
14

You're the one that brought up race 😂😂😂
/r/MensRights06/09/21 10:15 PM
2

It's definitely the killing of a potential baby. Not everyone agrees that an early stage fetus is actually a baby yet.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:52 PM
2

I wasn't talking about this specifically, I was talking in general.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:41 PM
12

Please don't flush condoms, it's absolutely terrible for the plumbing. Just pump a bit of soap into it and be suspicious if her pussy starts smelling like lavender. Also you can't really push both that abortion is bad and that men should be able to opt out. It's both or neither.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:51 PM
5

Then why be mad about discrimination? It's just they're ideology.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:19 AM
1

You think it's absurd that principles that apply to living citizens don't apply to things that aren't alive nor citizens?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:17 AM
1

Why does it matter if it's done alone or with the help of a consenting adult? If they consent, then they aren't being dragged into it.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:15 AM
2

Maybe the clump of cells should just get better at defending itself. Regardless of how it came into existence, it doesn't have the right to my body. If I ran someone over with my care and he needed a blood transfusion, but the hospital was out of his blood type. If I was his blood type I still legally couldn't forced to donate blood, even though it wouldn't harm me, and I had induced the situation.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:10 AM
58

It's because the certainty isn't statistically high enough to include the last digit.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 08:28 AM
24

It's pretty common to round to nearest number instead of adding statistically insignificant digits. Summing to 99 or 101 is perfectly normal.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 08:27 AM
0

If you're just trying to fit in, being singled out is pretty detrimental to that purpose.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:14 PM
15

Or don't. We don't want anybody to be able to say that we have any involvement in that mess.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 07:46 PM
1

I was being cautious with 1k, I'm pretty sure it's significantly lower, though the side effects of running a low income onlyfans is also much smaller.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 04:08 PM
2

It's a tiny fraction of women on only fans that actually make good money doing it. Most make under 1k a month, you just never hear about them, because if you heard about them they would be making more.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 01:47 PM
19

Haven't read the article or seen the thread, but demanding that someone has that olympic medal taken away is pretty pathetic.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:19 PM
4

Nah, I think they just wanted to use an image, that it would be impossible for the people that made the first one to disagree with.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 04:05 PM
13

For me the least manly you can do is change your behavior and mannerisms because you fear what others might think of you.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 10:43 AM
21

TIL I apparently had a fetish for middle school geography.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 07:59 AM
2

Yeah, so it's never true consent, but still different from using physical force.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 09:34 AM
2

She does mention that part in regards to Africa, where a lot of work had been done trying to get girls to stay in school longer, covid shutting down schools set that work back years.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 03:02 PM
3

yeah, but that wasn't what you just said, you referred to the concept as a whole.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/21 10:14 PM
1

European phd's are 3 years, and require a masters degree to start, which is included in the American ones, so both are about equal lengths.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/21 10:12 PM
1

Do you know how dictionaries work? If words are used they go in with a description of how they were used. Literally now means both literally and figuratively because it was used that way so much, and dictionaries are descriptive.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 02:24 PM
1

Literally now means both literally and figuratively, I'm sure if the dictionary authors were willing to deviate from protocol, they would have left that one out.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 02:22 PM
5

Yeah, and some feminists will even argue that longer sentences for men if sexist against women.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 12:59 PM
9

Yeah, It's a political roleplay/meme sub if OP is taking it seriously he should probably just stop going there.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 10:17 PM
1

Johnny's problem is that he went after The Sun first, since defamation cases against public individuals are tricky since there just have to be reasonable cause to believe it, which based on Amber Heard's accusations, there were. This means that Depp had to prove that The Sun published the pieces fully knowing that they were false, which is an almost entirely insurmountable burden of evidence.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 10:33 PM
17

If this place want to be as whiny and strawman arguey as /r/feminism, then nobody is going to stop you from it, people elsewhere is just going to start taking this place less and less serious.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 09:34 PM
1

Who lives longer isn't deterministic of how individuals perceive the qualitive of the care. And it wasn't my point, I was clarifying what her point was, because nothing in the titles indicate supporting that it was related to the point she was making.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:47 PM
-2

This sub has honestly gotten way worse over the last year or so, people here are getting as whiny and strawman arguing as some of the feminists subs and it sucks, because it used to be better than this.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:44 PM
-79

Is that actually the point she is making? I'm pretty sure she is referring to women more often feeling like doctors are dismissive or ignoring symptoms of women.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 09:28 AM
33

No, but it does cover his back if the university tried to take action
/r/MensRights07/04/21 11:43 AM
79

The good part is that since there is no on campus interaction everything is digital. If she wants to make an accusation, all evidence is readily available.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 11:34 AM
1

I do feel for her in the third post, why date a single parent if you don't want anything to do with the kids?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/21 07:00 PM
28

Yeah, this kind of post is half the reason the sub is even here.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 11:08 PM
-3

If the only think that making you love a child is genetic resemblance, then you should probably reconsider some things.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 05:16 AM
-1

Wikipedia is an incomplete work, wanting more women doesn't mean that it has to be at the expense of men. And pointing out that the incompleteness is asymmetrical and that this affects the reader is not a bad thing either. Why not? We're a tiny minority online and unless someone says the secret Danish code phrase it really doesn't seem unreasonable to assume that people reading the translated version, don't speak the language of the original. Nobody was commenting on or questioning validity of t…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 06:17 PM
-5

She did exactly that by writing biographies about early female game developers herself. At no point in the article does she say that women are denied the opportunity to become wikipedia editors, she simple states that the majority of the editors are male, and that it might influence the distribution of subjects chosen for biographies. People were circlejerking about the translated degree title and I was the only one that commented on the Danish name. So that plus considering that something like …
/r/MensRights19/02/21 05:33 PM
-7

I really don't see the article as being that bad. Unless you want to argue that men are 6 times as relevant as women, then she has a point that biographies of women are underrepresented. The idea that this could be related to the vast majority of editors on the site being male isn't completely outrageous either. The obvious solution to that would simply be for more women to get involved in writing wikipedia articles, which is exactly what she did. People on this sub however went on attack based …
/r/MensRights19/02/21 03:02 PM
-3

Holy shit calm down. Your comment honestly reads like it would belong on Tumblr based on exaggeration, aggression and mind numbing level of repetition. I read the article(the interview not the thesis itself), and besides leaving out some factors(which may or may not be in the thesis), it doesn't seem that bad. She noted that the number of biographies of women were lower across almost all fields, and also noted that the large majority of editors were male, so she wrote a handful of biographies he…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 01:26 PM
5

I read the article in Danish and it doesn't. The Danish title is datalogi, which I guess translates pretty well to computer science.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 01:14 PM
9

Honestly Google is punishing her harder than than whatever she would reasonably get in court.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 11:19 AM
1

Should Canada going full Orwellian mean that I have to accept authoritarianism elsewhere?
/r/MensRights14/12/20 01:25 PM
17

> Hating the opposite sex should be a hate crime. ​ That would be a thoughtcrime. The law should only ever punish actions.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 10:57 AM
2

You present half the data, and get upset I make my conclusion, only on what's presented...
/r/MensRights11/12/20 04:29 PM
-7

Then post the whole fucking thread.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 03:49 PM
1

That interpretation is some Tumblr level looking for outrage.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 03:47 PM
-4

I read it, but I have to interpret it very specifically to get your point. I read it as them saying "speak for yourself", rather than directly dividing it up into men and women. If you aren't looking to be offended it's not that bad.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 02:54 PM
0

I'm not saying men don't get raped, I'm saying that it wasn't the topic of discussion, so randomly bringing it up is disruptive and obnoxious.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 02:51 PM
-19

It's downvoted because nowhere did anybody say that only men rape or only women get raped, the discussion was about rape being a choice or an instinct, but you just had to add something derailing and unnecessary.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 01:48 PM
1

So anybody who doesn't want children are mentally ill?
/r/MensRights03/11/20 04:22 PM
5

Why should homosexuality be in the DSMV?
/r/MensRights03/11/20 02:17 PM
29

ask her if she believes that it happens in every single workplace. If you can get her to agree that it happens in 50% of workplaces(still a huge number), Then show her that in the 50%, where it does happen the wagegap must be 100 vs 56 if she actually believes that it's 78% and happens in 50% of workplaces.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 09:15 PM
50

Don't need to fill the room with stuff when you have a view like that.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 07:55 AM
2

Just sound interested and ask her to send you the research.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:36 PM
15

For context the homosexuality law hasn't been enforced for a long time and is only not repealed on grounds of "religious harmony". A bigger issue is marriage inequality and its effect on access to leasing public housing.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 01:46 AM
4

There will also be an entry level employment gap, ss feminists price women out.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 01:21 AM
5

Not a single Ross and Rachel reference smh 😔
/r/MensRights27/07/20 12:25 PM
2

I would same equal but not identical.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:20 PM
1

Not sure how they would cancel her either. She's just an employee for TSM.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 07:07 AM
7

This is why women make less money than men, if you have a human kidney and you can only get an iPhone for it, then you seriously suck at business.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 10:14 AM
6

It's separated into open and women's. There are no men's only tournament. A big part of this in both chess and esports is that the male playerbase is vastly larger.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 08:46 AM
52

Oh yes
/r/MensRights26/04/20 02:10 PM
9

She spent shared money on the lottery ticket. If they had both paid for a house they would obviously also share the value of the house.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 05:09 PM
3

Chinese numbers aren't really representative, since a lot more Chinese men than women smoke.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 08:13 PM
3

Or Casey Anthony.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 08:21 AM
4

A potato is never actively wrong.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 08:20 AM
11

She knows her actions might kill him, and you think our base assumptions of her should be positive?
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:43 PM
13

So cold language devoid of any sympathy towards the assumed plausibility that her actions will lead to the death of her husband, should be excused or ignored?
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:32 PM
13

I don't expect the same amount of sympathy from you as I would a partner of 17 years, who's the father of my children.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:16 PM
19

Is there a single shred of any kind of sympathy for the father in the post?
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:54 PM
23

The problem is that she gives 0 fucks about the father of her children kills himself.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:41 PM
6

The Democrats fucking love losing.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 05:31 PM
7

Yeah, there could be a million reasons to discriminate between two politicians, so jumping to one specific conclusion is stupid.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 07:44 AM
16

Especially since they didn't use anesthesia or intubation, which is usually part of the reason they want an empty stomach in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:13 AM
4

We can't know how long it took to get home or when it happened. I'm inclined to side with the guy, but we're missing at least half a dozen details.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 07:17 AM
46

At best
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:50 AM
9

Relative to women other places, so these are high variance terms. I promise you there is 0% chance that any of these terms are more popular than six pack or big dick.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 12:50 PM
2

Can't even just tap out and settle for being the one doing the gang gangbanging, because when she gets called out for being a skank, you get accused of rape.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 04:47 PM
8

She's 3 months pregnant and he cheated for 6 months. He knocked her up while he was cheating. Fuck that guy. Also she's on a partner visa, so since the partnership is obviously doomed, she might not even be able to stay. He's mad she's leaving, but he basically revoked her visa.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 10:18 AM
2

Inelastic demand and government backed undefaultable loans. I can't anything more supply sided
/r/MensRights19/12/19 06:43 AM
19

The people with most desire to be on that court are people with a gender bias.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 02:44 PM
40

Yeah Bezos wife was a secretary out something before they got married. Why should she be entitled to continue living to that standard?
/r/MensRights13/12/19 08:10 AM
3

he now hates hugs 😭
/r/MensRights27/11/19 03:40 PM
3

That's not the app, it's your keyboard, which is based on your own behaviour. It will mostly focus on the previous single word and not the full sentence, so since you're on this sub you probably just say "most men" fairly often.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 08:33 AM
2

Then why do you think it's worrying? Couples staying together for life and both of them deciding to have children without getting married is bad because? The man is paying for the womans decision to a much larger degree in East Asia than the Nordics regardless of what wedlock rates say, because wedlock rates are garbage unless the countries being compared have the same views on wedding.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 03:25 PM
1

There are a lot of semi permanent reversible birth control options for women, like IUD, so hysterectomies are rare unless there are other medical reasons.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 03:19 PM
1

Lol you know fuck all about neither the Nordic countries or South Korea. In the Nordics it's common to not get married at all, but still be a couple. Me and many of my friends were born out of wedlock to loving couples, who end up living together for decades without getting married, or only get married after having children. South Korea on the other hand is super traditionalistic and much more formal about marriage, but that doesn't mean that fathers have better relationships with their children…
/r/MensRights21/11/19 03:17 PM
2

My parents divorced when me and my sister were 11 and 13, but stayed close friends and live near each other. I'd take that any day over them staying together and growing resentful of each other.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 03:10 PM
5

Yeah, I thought the same thing as a Dane. The Nordic countries are pretty areligious, so nobody thinks of it, if a couple has a child before or without getting married. I was born a bastard, because my parents just hadn't gotten around to getting married, which they only did afterwards because it removed any custody paperwork.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 03:08 PM
14

Freedom of religion can only exist if you have freedom from religion. If you are physically irreversibly branded by a religion, then you can never be completely free in your choice of religion.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 01:54 PM
9

Prevenge?
/r/MensRights21/11/19 09:41 AM
2

Next level method actor
/r/MensRights19/11/19 03:10 AM
3

It interests me how many humanities journals don't require any kind of data or measurements.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:56 PM
1

Yes, but the mentioned example has explicitly Japan.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 05:46 AM
1

That is in China though, not Japan.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 02:07 AM
18

Guess ladies didn't get paid.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 02:03 AM
4

Yeah, dick pics are intended to be sexual, while breastfeeding clearly isn't.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 04:29 AM
17

It sounds like a fantasy quote. We must destroy the orbs of Gonadrasil, it's where the dark armies draw their strength.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 05:33 AM
0

Go read the article. It's for couple that struggle to regain intimacy. It's meant as an alternative to divorce, so it's not meant to be a quick fix,or the first thing to be tried. I don't want to keep discussing something with someone who didn't read the subject matter and just goes by the cover. If I
/r/MensRights06/11/19 04:33 PM
1

The article is actually not too bad, they suggest casual polyamory for people who are struggling with low sex drives, as an alternative to choosing between a dead bedroom and a divorce. The title is rage bait, but everyone on this sub took it, everyone this screenshot was posted.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 03:36 PM
5

And most school shooters feel ostracised and othered. He's basically grooming himself.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 09:02 AM
0

I like how you count being stupid to the point of frustration for everyone else, as a win rather than a character flaw. I'm living my life how I want it, but your comment seems out of place since this entire sub is about how societies perception of our gender affect our lives.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 05:50 AM
0

Not really, but people expecting to live your life according to their ideals, can be annoying. And "hit too close to home" doesn't mean you win anything in a discussion, it just means you were aggressive enough in your ignorance of the values others, to cause harm. It's as stupid as making ridiculous accusations, and then claiming that you must be right, because they got defensive, when they wouldn't just take your abuse.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 04:42 AM
0

Meh the purpose of marriage is tax benefits, everything else is personal.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 03:04 AM
1

I never claimed it was admirable, I'm only saying that I don't have to live my life based on your expectations of what I should do is. And it's not the same as leaving your children, because I haven't gotten any, so I don't have responsibilities to any.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 03:01 AM
2

I never expected anyone to conform to anything, they expected me to conform to their life goals, they ideas of what sex is and what relationships could be. I say that casual polyamory or occasional consensual affairs, might be preferable to choosing between a dead bedroom and a divorce. And then they flip on me and accuse me of collapsing society with my whoremongering. If they read the article, it would be incredibly obvious to them that literally nobody suggested that.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 02:59 AM
1

If I have kids I'm going to be very likely going to be resentful, that it forced me to change everything about my life, because nothing in my lifestyle is compatible with children. I don't think it's selfish to not introduce more unloved children.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 02:55 AM
1

Fuck your life script. Having kids aren't for everyone, nobody is "supposed" to do anything except live life how they want it. Sex means different things to different, and someone else not falling within with your ideas doesn't mean they are trivialising the concept. You make it sound like other people not wanting to be your partner sue to having different preferences constitute a real offence to you. You're the reason feminists think this sub is stuck in the 50s.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:14 PM
1

It trivializes sexual bonds and makes them into nothing more than a traded commodity. "gays being allowed to marry ruin the sanctity of my marriage".
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:03 PM
-10

What exactly does it do to society? If everyone involved consent, then "society" can honestly fuck off.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 03:59 PM
1

A lot of women go clubbing to dance, while a lot of men go clubbing to hook up.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 03:55 PM
27

It's pretty obvious, but the people that go don't care, and the people that care don't go, so you see a biased demographic if you work at a venue.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 06:37 AM
23

I don't really think this case is about discrimination. Clubs want an even ratio of men and women, but more men typically go to clubs, so they use prices to adjust the guest ratio. But yeah, for most other things positive discrimination is bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 06:35 AM
61

Do all women check in or do they just assume consent is continous?
/r/MensRights29/10/19 01:16 AM
12

Good job erasing stereotypes...
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:07 AM
3

if no one is calling 9-11 for police help, what should you have your cops do? Should they just sit in their offices waiting? Or should they be proactively neutralizing potential danger? The answer is pretty easy. Flyfuck ticketing
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:34 AM
2

The US is open?
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:32 AM
1

Was it also true before US got involved in the early 90s?
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:29 AM
4

Substitute Men/male with government and the post is spot on.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:29 AM
1

Yeah, it's harder to do and have a smaller client base compared to normal cars, so it will be the last thing automated.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 10:13 AM
14

Intentionally making yourself unreachable is still kinda abandonment, even though you placed them in someone else's consenting care.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:34 AM
3

Lol how were Japan "doing so well"? It's a very traditionalist country and living there is way different from being a tourist.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 04:46 PM
4

He's referencing trump.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 09:59 AM
39

Yeah, but you can't sue the federation for Fifa practices.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 09:33 AM
1

My job is fun and kids are terrible. Daycare cost for a couple of children for several years runs up in a lot of money. Obviously the benefits wear off when the kids start school. The idea is that the labour division makes sense at the time, but leaves one party better off in case of a divorce. The concept of divorcees never getting a job afterwards is ridicules though.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 05:51 PM
3

If the agreement wad that she would be a stay at home mum and he would work, then she has still provided years worth of cleaning and childcare services.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 06:28 AM
4

Terrible title. I have no clue what the article is about
/r/MensRights16/07/19 03:06 AM
13

Doesn't really apply to national teams, since supply and demand is artificially restricted, by only allowing one team from each country.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 02:12 AM
6

Can't have child porn on the Internet if you remove the Internet.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 10:13 AM
4

I'm 185 so I don't mind xD too bad that of the 3 sentences she used to the describe herself Two of them not only incredibly shallow, but also disproved the third.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 06:56 PM
-26

Can we stop making this comparison, because it's fucking shit. Women's sports will always be behind men's sports physically. This is an argument of economics, so make economic arguments.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:50 AM
13

The thread was deleted, but I read the comments and it looks like the part about two rooms wasn't disclosed until halfway through the discussion, at which point pretty much everyone blame the company.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 12:28 AM
1

I thought bisexuals were suppose to get the best of both worlds, turns out we get the worst of both worlds instead s:
/r/MensRights02/07/19 11:49 AM
1

Then you are also making an argument that the entire structure of fundamental human rights should be changed.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 08:01 PM
1

Saying that you would break the law is hardly a solid legal argument.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 04:40 PM
9

Props to the tattoo artist. I was having doubts that it was actually a tattoo, because it looks like it is a real 3d structure rather than just drawn on a surface.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:12 PM
0

Imagine thinking you are entitled to other peoples bodies.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:09 PM
4

a) It's a lump of cells, not a person. b) If a single drop of my blood could save a hundred people, then even if I was the reason they were sick in the first place, I could not be forced to donate blood, because my right to bodily autonomy is legally considered to be the highest of rights.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:07 PM
3

If I poisoned a thousand people and a single drop of my blood could cure them all, the government couldn't legally force me to give blood. Obviously in this scenario I would be tried and convicted for murder, but there is no action you can take that overrides your bodily autonomy, so there is no legal basis for your argument.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 01:32 PM
1

I too enjoy getting funding, but the output of social media and pop science content of most scientists is a lot lower than musicians, actors, etc.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 05:33 PM
14

Scientists are pretty boring unless you're in the field and actively follow their research.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 03:03 AM
3

If she didn't want to be a single mother she could have also just chosen to not have sex.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 07:22 AM
3

If she didn't want to be a single mother she shouldn't have had sex.....
/r/MensRights20/06/19 10:15 PM
3

She is actively choosing to create it. If she doesn't want to be a single mother she has the option to choose not to.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 10:14 PM
1

The physical difference is always going to be there in sports and that's fine, but that's not the reason why this isn't some big win for women's football. It doesn't show how good the women, all it shows is that the gap between the top and the bottom teams is too big. There is probably like 50 reasonably competitive teams mens teams in the world, which is why you don't see huge blowouts even in a 32 team tournament for the men, while there can be a 13-0 in the women's cup, because there isn't th…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 06:58 PM
3

Shame, I ussualy like Luisa Tam -. -
/r/MensRights20/06/19 12:27 PM
-1

For profit police has nothing to do with the free market. Imprisoning someone doesn't generate any value. It only becomes worthwhile doing because the government pays for it. Don't blame capitalism for problems that are entirely the fault of the government.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:53 AM
5

In capitalist countries you are entirely free to start your own socialistic collective / commune and nobody does so. In communist countries trading is banned by law and harshly punished, but you will always find black markets.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:49 AM
2

Comments say it's in Turkey, so more likely some religious thing than anything else.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:27 AM
1

Yeah, like Bocce ball. I don't know what the cost of grass vs astroturf is so I can't really say whether it's a reasonable expectation, but it certainly seems to be so, and it would probably have been something fairly easy to negotiate themselves into getting, but now they've put themselves into a corner by demanding an unsustainable economic structure of the organization and taking the fair working conditions becomes a loss.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 05:18 AM
1

Shitty yard game where you throw big balls as close to a small as possible. It's basically the grass version of curling. The point is just that you can't compare World cup and non-world cup years, but the financial cycle in football is 4 years long, just like you can't compare one sport that is in season with one that is out of season.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 04:57 AM
2

Yeah lol, they went on strike due to conflict with the union and had to forfeit a game. That game cost them the qualifiers. If they had beaten Sweden, they would be the ones playing against the US.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/19 03:32 AM
4

I seriously struggle to think of any time a professional sports team has failed to show humility in celebration when facing an opponent this far below them.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/19 03:28 AM
3

Didn't he own the majority of the company when they went public? Because then he wasn't really "given" them as much as his preexisting ownership was converted, when the company structure was changed.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/19 02:17 AM
3

Revisit Bobby Riggs versus Billie Jean King. Okay, but all the players on the male team has to be in their 50's and have gambling debts with the mafia.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/19 12:24 AM
3

Does he get 80 million shares or did he already have them because he took the risk and put in the effort to start the company from scratch?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/19 12:10 AM
8

There's a lot less safety in getting paid that way though. If the company goes down a bit, they lose a lot of money.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/19 12:09 AM
1

If I'm paid in cigarettes based on their pretax value, I might actually accept that.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 11:32 PM
1

Should prize money for tournaments generating 6B in revenue be different from prize money for tournaments generating 78M in revenue? The US women's team is good, but they look good in part because the rest of the world don't care, and are therefore also getting paid for participating in tournaments where the rest of the world don't care.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 11:28 PM
1

Lol they used the tennis battle of the sexes win as an actual game. Bobby Riggs was 55 years old. A better example of battle of the sexes would be Karsten Braasch vs the Williams sister: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Sexes_(tennis)#1998:_Karsten_Braasch_vs._the_Williams_sisters Another event dubbed a "Battle of the Sexes" took place during the 1998 Australian Open[56] between Karsten Braasch and the Williams sisters. Venus and Serena Williams had claimed that they could beat any ma…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 11:25 PM
1

In league play, yes. In world cup play, no. It would probably be smart to rest key players, but the tournament just started.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 11:03 PM
1

The prize pool relative to revenue generated is 9% for men and 13% for women at the world cup last time, so the women were actually paid relatively better. What makes the difference is that the women's tournament generated less than 80m revenue and the men's tournament made several billions.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 10:56 PM
1

A blow out at the world championship isn't really an argument that they should be making more money, it's an explanation for why they don't. When a few countries dominate the sport, it's because there is less global interest and therefore less money in the sport.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 06:05 PM
1

So should pay be paid on ability to generate income for your employer or not? Because men's football generate more money, so the players should be paid more.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:56 PM
2

It would be fun to see a few individual women players play at a high level mens team, but for example in 100m sprint the female world record is over 0.3s away from even being able to qualify for the men's Olympic event. The difference at the top is huge. Hockey goalies are different from the other positions since there are fewer player vs player physical interactions and you don't have to skate longer distances, so physical differences matter less, though I don't follow NHL or know the player so…
/r/MensRights10/06/19 04:06 PM
3

Mate the US women's team(and the teams of other nations has as well) lost to a U15 male squat. The physiological difference is just too big. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Sexes_(tennis)#1998:_Karsten_Braasch_vs._the_Williams_sisters This is the wikipedia page on when a rank 203rd man played against both Williams sisters: Another event dubbed a "Battle of the Sexes" took place during the 1998 Australian Open[56] between Karsten Braasch and the Williams sisters. Venus and Serena Will…
/r/MensRights10/06/19 03:51 PM
1

Not sure about the world cup, but pretty much all sports league have an open league and a women's league. Women are free to compete against, but can't because the physiological difference sets them too far behind. The top women's national teams struggle to not get run over by some of the better U15 male teams. And the business model of sports is the same as entertainment, you sell tickets and advertisement, not goals or wins. Why should the women's team be paid more than the entire tournament ma…
/r/MensRights10/06/19 03:41 PM
5

Super sad situation. I'm kind of curious why he doesn't state what he got his masters degree in.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:18 PM
4

I totally agree men will always be treated poorly in the media, whether they are the offender or the victim, but you can't really compare two cases, when one involves an international superstar.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 11:36 PM
5

Didn't press charges because he didn't want to get crowbared 🤔
/r/MensRights26/05/19 06:34 PM
23

Yeah, happily surprised to see them use "rape" about a female perpetrator.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:07 AM
2

Yeah, you're right. Sell some weed or steal a car and you deserve to either die in jail or in the gutter.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:24 PM
1

I like the idea of comparing drinking and driving punishments because it has some fairly easily comparable metrics; BAC, speed, etc.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:53 PM
7

Maybe women less likely to reoffend, because they are actually given second chances and aren't considered to be disposable pieces of human garbage.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:51 PM
2

The shirt in the OP would be a funny gift if the father had two daughters.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:33 PM
2

You are presumed innocent until proven guilty, but that's different from being proven innocent. It's the difference between not enough evidence, and evidence that you couldn't possibly have committed the crime due to e.g. whereabouts etc.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 08:44 PM
3

Yeah, that's my point. The false accusation punishment has to have it's own trial with its own standard for evidence, rather than just being the default outcome of a non guilty rape trial.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 04:46 PM
8

Okay, that's fair enough then.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 02:17 PM
67

But genuine rapes are hard to proof, so if insufficient evidence means that the accuser goes to jail, we'll end up jailing a lot of rape victims. Innocent until guilty should count for everyone, including accusers.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:38 PM
161

Is it proven innocent or not proven guilty? Because one is fair and the other is insane.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 10:40 AM
3

No, I remember them and that's why I used him as an example.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 05:57 PM
5

Then defend him from attacks on his masculinity, but join in on attacks on his ideas. It's just like criticizing Obama when he was in office, it's completely justified to criticize him, just don't criticize him for being black, and defend him from racist remarks, even if you disagree with him on most other things.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 04:04 PM
4

I haven't been a victim of either, but assault you at least have some way to resist.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:15 AM
5

The English language asked for it, by being on this side of the Web, at this time of night.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 12:20 AM
1

Saying whether it's gendered or not is still not sufficient then, if it isn't also toxic. It's the exact opposite of pregnancy entrapment, so it shouldn't belong up there.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 12:06 PM
1

You didn't answer the question. What do you actually want? To ban abortion because only women can have one? To require a mans consent to have an abortion? or to give the men the right to a legal abortion? No abortions at all, Abortion only with fathers consent or male legal abortion?
/r/MensRights14/04/19 11:55 AM
1

No shit the power to make choices are going to be asymmetric when the consequences of the choice is also asymmetric. What do you actually want? To ban abortion because only women can have one? To require a mans consent to have an abortion? or to give the men the right to a legal abortion? This thread is like 10 comments deep and you haven't actually said anything, besides being annoyingly pedantic.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 09:28 AM
2

Women being in control of their own bodies is a gendered issue? Bodily autonomy is the highest regarded legal right, based on that alone this should be a no brainer.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 01:42 AM
6

You aren't entitled to other peoples' bodies, so whether you want the baby or not, the decision is still up to the woman, as she will have to bear the labor of the pregnancy.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 01:02 AM
6

Yeah, but if you flip it around it's not exactly fair for a man to force a woman to go through an unwanted pregnancy, only because he alone wants the baby.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:16 PM
1

Yeah, that's a lot of stupid pandering gender quotas that results in unqualified people being hired, but I don't have any doubt that NASA will send someone suitable for their missions.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 03:27 PM
1

Yeah, just look at some of the Nobel Prizes in chemistry. I know for a fact that most of them haven't set foot in a lab in years, they have however done a lot of the intellectual work, grant application, organization, etc.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 03:22 PM
2

Is 6ft considered tall in the US? It's like the average in Northern Europe.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 08:12 PM
1

Next step is banning rope, medicin and tall buildings and if that doesn't work then maybe we'll try doing a tiny bit about the underlying causes.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 12:05 PM
1

There's not much stability or security in living paycheck to paycheck without savings.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 08:03 PM
8

All he did was lie there. He didn't actively do anything, so what is he liable for?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 10:12 AM
8

Why do insurance companies pay for it?
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:21 AM
31

If you cut off my son's penis, I'll be charged with assault." Ftfy
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:19 AM
0

Meh, not really and regardless it's still irrelevant to the point. She is forgotten because she sucked at terrorism.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 05:03 PM
1

Then it's still correct pronouns??
/r/MensRights17/03/19 12:19 AM
6

We forgot about her because she was a terrible shooter.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 04:49 PM
1

The requirements was 401K and a clean drug test. Those two combined pretty clearly indicates that she wants stability.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 12:18 PM
10

Exec vs non-exec is such huge difference you might as well include the janitors.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 12:17 AM
1

Her name is Kate and the author is Kate... 🤔🤔🤔
/r/MensRights27/02/19 11:49 PM
2

Are you calling your male coworkers hun, sweetie or darling?
/r/MensRights27/02/19 12:59 AM
2

Dogs deserve to be higher
/r/MensRights25/02/19 11:26 PM
1

I can read just fine and I already have a long education. You didn't answer my question anywhere in the thread. How can you make political change if you are unwilling to engage with those who disagree with you.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 07:11 PM
1

What kind of political change can you achieve if you refuse to talk about anything with anybody?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 12:13 PM
1

Doesn't matter if you main Nami or Janna, if you pick them in a solo lane or jungle and you aren't leagues ahead of your opponent they lose. None of the supports are flex picks, so it doesn't matter if all 5 can play the champion if only one of them can realistically pick if without just instantly losing them the game.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 11:25 PM
0

They aren't champions they would have picked anyways and if they would have taken more than one of those characters if would have been a free game anyways, because that strategy is shit. What has most value banning champions against a player that can play 5 or 6 champions or someone who can play 2 or 3 champions. All of the girls being support champions means that you should ban the easy champions in the roles they switched too.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 03:05 AM
1

Yes, but that doesn't matter when they aren't in that role. People keep bringing up 4 of the players playing support in soloq like they were going to play Janna or Nami mid lane. Someone who has mained support for a long time can handle 5 supports being banned, but someone who only just started playing another role will be destroyed if they lose 3 picks from their pool.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 03:01 AM
2

Actually support was still open in second ban phase, so the thresh and braum ban made sense(and both are actually meta so those were fine). Since 4 of the players were former support mains, the best strat wouldn't be to ban out all the support champions, but to ban out the safe champions in other roles. Force a new midlaner to play a champion they aren't used to.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 03:00 AM
3

A bit of lower rank is such an understatement, it would be like if you took the worst NFL team and played them against the best high school team.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:57 AM
1

Yes, but if Froggen lane swapped to jungle you wouldn't ban Anivia against him, if he wanted to play Anivia jungle you'd be happy to play 4v5 while he dies to krugs. They weren't going to play Nami or Janna mid, so don't ban it. When you are playing against a team that has recently laneswapped a player, you ban out the player who has just started a new role and has a smaller champion pool. The player that has played support for 2 years is going to be able to deal with bans better than the player…
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:55 AM
7

That's only because Vaevictis is put together from 4 low diamond nami mains. Lots of pros used to be one tricks, but that doesn't mean you would ban their old champions against them when they are out of the meta.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 04:09 PM
3

IIRC FF is discouraged in pro play, I haven't seen a surrender in even the most one sided games in pro play in at least a couple of years.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:33 PM
3

I didn't say they should be punished for it, but there is literally nobody who watches competitive league of legends who would defend those bans as having any value whatsoever(The Thresh and Braum bans were fine since VS hadn't picked a support yet and ROX had).
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:32 PM
1

The stereotype is that female player mostly play the support role, on a team they still only have one support so it's not really awkward at all. The bans were entirely trolling and nobody who actually watches league of legends would consider those bans a viable strategy. That said they shouldn't be punished just because veavictis dropped their high ranked roster(which left them unemployed and in a bad spot) and fielded a low ranked all female team.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:18 PM
27

Their bans weren't going hard on them, their bans were straight trolling. They shouldn't be punished for throwing away their bans, just because vaevictis fielded a roster too terrible for the draft phase to matter what so ever.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:12 PM
10

Vaevictis should honestly just be disqualified. They are fucking low-mid diamond ffs, no pro team, even in wildcard regions like Russia, would field anything lower than master tier player. That said, anybody here defending the bans as legit, don't play the game because the bans were in fact disrespectful, and they could afford being disrespectful because their opponent was utterly terrible.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:09 PM
2

At 28, I was ready for someone who could pass a drug test and was actively contributing to his 401(k) for a change. She doesn't say anything about her 401K, she only specifies that he should be contributing to his own, which would just indicate, that he has stability in his life.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 10:46 AM
-3

Looking only at the quote: At 28, I was ready for someone who could pass a drug test and was actively contributing to his 401(k) for a change. It doesn't seem much like a gold digger, just looking for stability.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 05:30 PM
1

Does this need to be posted every single day?
/r/MensRights14/02/19 10:59 AM
2

Feminists talk about toxic masculinity, so just comparing with how many masculine people risk their lives ti save others should be sufficient.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 09:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter