TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TexasThomas Archive

View 0 posts and 118 comments by TexasThomas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I wouldn't decide anything beforehand. Artificially planning in advance is a recipe for failure. Think about it: what if there's some real sexual tension built up between you two and you just artificially shut it down? What exactly does that accomplish? I never plan in advance, I just let it happen organically. And sure enough, if there's no sexual tension I don't bother....it's not that she'd say "no," but the sex just isn't as good if there's no tension between us. And for us, tension is creat…
/r/askMRP30/05/17 02:21 AM
1

Ok good luck.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/05/17 12:14 AM
1

Look at my posts here. It's about the subject at hand. You're the one who brought up creationism, not me.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/05/17 12:07 AM
0

Where have I pushed creationism? Crickets. I only bring up how stupid evolution is when people like you bring the subject up in the first place. And you can do nothing but try to ban the guy you don't like or can't handle intellectually. Typical beta faggot commie.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/05/17 12:03 AM
0

Oh that's convincing. You think you're a mutated fish. Idiot. Why should anyone take seriously what your monkey brain thinks or believes?
/r/MarriedRedPill22/05/17 11:54 PM
0

The only thing imaginary is your dumb-luck-did-it god.
/r/MarriedRedPill21/05/17 01:11 PM
1

Good post. Glad it worked out for you. But on another note, since you brought it up there's an issue that's always bothered me: I'm trying to figure out how one "rapes" his wife. Rape is a legal term. Legally my wife consented to sex with me on our wedding day..."to have and to hold till death do us part." Likewise it would be asinine for her to press sexual assault charges on me for randomly slapping her butt or grabbing her tits....or how about filing indecent exposure charges on me for walkin…
/r/MarriedRedPill21/05/17 01:30 AM
0

Actually richard Dawkins doesn't debate creationists because he'd get his ass handed to him. https://youtu.be/CAzndMmnZJk
/r/MarriedRedPill21/05/17 01:17 AM
5

Agreed. Conflict and emotion can stir the pot and get the juices flowing. But I don't necessarily look for a fight as much as I look for chances to simply put her in her place...to impose my will on her, to make her do things my way. It's fun to be a man. And me being a man allows her to settle in and be more joyfully-feminine, which is what she's wired to do anyway. Red pill has opened my eyes on how to be alive...to be passionate, to fearlessly speak my mind, and yea, to be confrontational som…
/r/MarriedRedPill12/05/17 03:15 AM
1

Good post. As a Christian this was my problem. I equated being a Christian to being a habitual nice guy to my wife. I thought the nicer I was, the more I gave her, the more I let her have her way the happier she'd be. It makes me sick how long that went on. Man was I fooled/misinformed/in the dark. Thank heaven I came across this stuff. (It was really only by a stroke of luck that I did so though.). But when I started cracking down on my wife, putting barriers up and telling her what to do, she …
/r/MarriedRedPill06/05/17 02:02 AM
1

here's something I've done a few times for hugs that seems to work well. Usually I do it before I walk out the door for work in the morning, but I'll say "hey!" then point my finger at her and say "come over here" while motioning with my crooked index finger....she'll come over and I'll say "now put your arms around me,"....and while we're hugging I'll say, "and act like you mean it."....that'll usually get a giggle out of her....then I'll kiss her then leave, both smiling. In a way, though it's…
/r/askMRP04/05/17 12:54 AM
1

Yes, real men help women. Real men love their wives.
/r/askMRP30/04/17 03:23 AM
1

I stopped treating my wife as an equal when I acknowledged the following. Other than being nurturing, there's virtually nothing that women can do better than men. (Generally speaking). On the other hand men do tons of things better than women. Likewise, there is virtually nothing my wife can do better than me, other than being a great, nurturing mommy. Why should I treat her as an equal; she's obviously inferior. This is not to boost my own ego, it's just a truism, a statement of fact. The way I…
/r/MarriedRedPill30/04/17 02:43 AM
1

How old are we, 4?
/r/askMRP27/04/17 07:30 PM
1

He didn't actually say they already had buns. And it's not an excuse. I'm just trying to read between the lines and assume that the wife is not totally and stupidly illogical. (Yes I do know it happens sometimes) but...Why would she get so pissed off for two days if he physically couldn't go get the buns because he was cooking? Nothing about this story makes sense, as told.
/r/askMRP26/04/17 05:08 PM
1

Well clearly nobody in their right mind would ask someone who's in the middle of cooking meat to stop everything and run to the store right then. That's ludicrous. Totally Illogical. She may have thought, or there may have been, some other time he could go.
/r/askMRP26/04/17 04:50 PM
2

Nope. The issue is not about the wife's reaction, which indeed was childish, but rather the husband's refusal to help her out by going to the store in the first place. For no reason. If he had a really good reason, (sick, busy, whatever) fine. But he was clearly just being an ass unnecessarily. I can see why so many marriages here are on the rocks.
/r/askMRP26/04/17 04:39 AM
2

funny...I literally just got done putting a closet door back on that had fallen out and needed new screws. My wife bought the screws today and wanted to clean out the closet to make room for some of my daughter's things....this is something she could've done (hung the closet door)...but she asked me to help her...(aka do it.) I didn't really want to because it's been a long day.....but I did it anyway. Because I love her and want to help her if possible. Sure, nobody wants to be taken advantage …
/r/askMRP26/04/17 02:36 AM
2

Her intent or the fact that she made the request are not a problem. Her behavior after the fact is the problem. I agree with that. I think she probably overreacted in a childish way, but that's a different issue. The issue is did "he" do the right thing. As you said, there was nothing wrong with her request...thus...if there was nothing wrong with her request, then he refused to do it for no good reason. Sometimes we husbands need to do things for our wives because we love them and want to help.…
/r/askMRP26/04/17 02:04 AM
1

Heaven forbid he ever forget something and ask her to help him out. Just switch roles. Imagine your wife refusing to help you when asked. Just because. Doesn't even matter what it is. Sorry, still say that's a bad move.
/r/askMRP26/04/17 12:57 AM
1

wow....the way I see it all this was totally unnecessary. Your wife asking you to go buy buns was not a shit test, she wasn't disrespecting you, she wasn't taking advantage of you, etc...it was just a simple request. Women like to entertain, they like to have people over and they often rush around beforehand and get nervous (like my wife) -- and they like everything to be perfect. Let her have her fun. Instead you ruined it. For what?...for getting buns. What if you had innocently asked her to g…
/r/askMRP26/04/17 12:10 AM
1

" Last, but not least, slapping her in the butt or any part of her body is unacceptable and is the same as hitting and will not be tolerated." That is just....odd. Are you hitting her butt too hard? Is a soft-ish smack off limits too? how about walking up behind her and grabbing it? Regardless, this intolerance of being happily-smacked seems like a rejection of your power, of any notion of your leadership -- and worse, a rejection of something that makes you happy and turns you on..... It's a su…
/r/askMRP24/04/17 11:21 PM
7

had to go to a conference one evening a while back (would be getting back home at 10pm), but before I left (about 5pm) I hugged my wife at the door, but then did a weird thing out of the blue that was totally unplanned and just sorta popped out in the moment....I pointed in her face and said very seriously and sounding slightly irritated: "Hey....I want you to have that little pink thing on for me when I get home tonight...do you hear me?" I kid you not, she giggled and squealed "okayyy...!" lik…
/r/MarriedRedPill14/04/17 10:54 PM
5

that's a bad sign....so the more successful you are, the more attractive you get, the more improvements you make, the more resentful she gets..... Talk about being an immature child....she was supposed to love you for better or for worse; but you getting better just makes it worse...that's messed up.
/r/askMRP11/04/17 09:05 PM
3

screw the meditation....go run. I do wind sprints with intermittent walking. get that heart rate up for at least 30-40 mins a few times a week. I don't have anger problems but I do have anxiety issues and if I don't run I start getting overwhelmed with things that are out of my control. Lifting weights helps too....take your anger out in the gym. And here is my personal view on why wives don't happily have sex with their husbands. Not saying this applies to you, but you can take it for what it's…
/r/askMRP10/04/17 11:19 PM
1

Yes yes, we know all about horizontal gene transfer, that's part of Evolutionary Theory. No it's not. Your theory says only populations evolve. Your theory says that all adaptive changes in populations are accomplished by way of random mutation and natural selection. Your naturalism requires that all variation arise by chance. But HGT is none of that. It's accomplished by individuals, it's highly regulated, and it bypasses natural selection entirely because the laterally-transferred gene/trait i…
/r/MarriedRedPill09/04/17 02:06 PM
12

"I said "I'm not interested in arguing with you, the kid's gone tonight so we can go out for a nice date and have a fun dinner, come home and have some fun or you can yell at me. But I'm not taking you to dinner so you can berate me, I'll wait for you to pick up some groceries and do something else tonight -- your choice." congrats....That's a work of art right there. Not only did you stand up to her nicely and smack down her crap, but you did it in a way that allowed the real possibility of sal…
/r/askMRP09/04/17 02:26 AM
1

so you only have sex with your wife twice in 10 months, yet she's giving blowjobs and screwing around with other men?.....what am I missing? why do you want this to work out? She's got you wrapped around her finger for sure. She must be really good in bed, when you actually get it every few months. sigh
/r/askMRP08/04/17 06:35 PM
1

Your side can never, ever, demonstrate their teleonomic theory in action. Sure we can. Look up Cit+ E. Coli or nylon eating bacteria - if you want some recent examples. The mechanism is well understood by people who aren't fooling themselves about their level of competence (you). all you can do is assume that bacteria operate in a teleonomic (darwinian way)....there are plenty of researchers who disagree...bacteria work as a functional unit, commit suicide for the betterment of the population, p…
/r/MarriedRedPill08/04/17 01:03 PM
1

again, what is scientific is that individuals change in response to environmental contingencies.....what is not scientific is that "only populations evolve" via natural selection plus random variation. The issue here is that the vast majority, if not all, of the known adaptive morphological changes that happen in individuals are changes that get triggered by the environment. What's more, each individuals are mindful and interactive with the environment and thus it is quite possible that all indi…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/04/17 11:07 PM
1

I don't know that we've ever sequenced the sparrow's genome to be able to pinpoint the specific mutation - but there's no other explanation. sure there is. could be epigenetic. Gene expression. Could be that epigenetics induced a mutation...who knows. But if you "don't know" what the nature of the variation is, why did you present it as an example of "evolution?" see what I mean? Your side can never, ever, demonstrate their teleonomic theory in action. What can be demonstrated is that individual…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/04/17 11:02 PM
1

as for your "evolution" of birds and their wing length (roadkill, etc) link....where exactly is the random mutations that caused the wings to be different lengths? Sure, there may be some element of selection there, but where's the other half of the equation? It's not there. In fact, check this link out: http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110325/full/news.2011.187.html?s=news_rss Frightened birds grow longer wings. Remember mind over matter? In this case if the mothers interacted with predators, th…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/04/17 12:15 AM
1

Stress hormones. as if those happen via dumb luck....think consciousness has anything to do with that? a conscious interaction with the environment is the "mechanism" by which organisms change/adapt to their surroundings. No physical accidents. No random mutations....no natural selection...no lady luck -- just a mindful awareness that, yes, triggers hormones, and those hormones are messenger molecules that activate specific biological changes. Besides which, epigenetic changes aren't always bene…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/04/17 12:06 AM
1

The layman's version is that, due to environmental factors that one generation is exposed to, the subsequent generation can have dormant DNA expression activated. A great example is the water flea: when a mother experiences danger from a predator during her life, her children (as a result of stress hormone in her body) will have little armored helmets. It's still acting upon DNA, it's just activating an inactive trait. I'm aware of the water flea thing.....somehow the awareness of/interaction wi…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 10:35 PM
1

No, it isn't - it's a temporary expression of an existing trait that exists in DNA. It's just a feature of genetic expression, that's it. You're completely misunderstanding what it is. The Theory of Evolution describes Why and How life changes over time (the FACT of Evolution), and Natural Selection is just one of several mechanisms behind that. Edit: Epigenetics, on the other hand, is just a temporary change of how genes that already exist can be turned on and off. The fact that these changes a…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 10:28 PM
1

It's yet another alternative to the theory of evolution. Sure enough animal populations change but it's never by random mutation plus natural selection. I bet you can't shown that to happen even once via the scientific method. On the other hand individuals adjust themselves on the fly (plasticity) and often this is heritable to future generations.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 04:15 PM
1

No I don't understand the technical side of it but I do know that methyl tags are attached and traits can be re expressed without a change in the base code. My understanding or lack of it of how it happens doesn't take away from the fact that it does happen and individuals can adapt to the environment on the fly. That goes against the theory of evolution which says only selection adapts populations. Individuals are not supposed to adapt themselves.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 04:04 PM
1

Is this heritable variation random? https://m.phys.org/news/2015-12-epigenetics-wild-guinea-pigs.html. When variation is directed in adaptive directions then it puts selection out of a job.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 03:48 PM
1

I don't really have time for this since I have to work. I'll give more in depth responses later.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 03:27 PM
1

I'm talking about the origin and nature of variation. You say dumb luck did it all.. I say origins of variation is nonrandom and probably miraculous in nature. You cannot show that any variant, any trait arose by chance. Selection is not really nonrandom either in real life (if variation is nonrandom then it renders selection redundant and a non factor) but that's another story.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 03:26 PM
1

No, at best lederberg thing just showed that variation previously existed rather than arising in response to the environment. Previously-existing does not equate to randomness and does not shed light on the nature of the variation' origin. And even if it was random in that circumstance it does not mean that ALL variation is random. Clearly it is not. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23580343/ http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15592294.2015.1062207 Your theory sucks.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 03:00 PM
1

No I asked for a paper. Pay attention.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 02:18 PM
3

I really like the book. For me the gold in it was a concept called "differentiation." this means that married people often tend to "fuse" aka act like a single person, with a single mind. This stems from the concept of how "two-become-one flesh" as found in the bible. But ultimately acting like siamese twins, as opposed to two completely separate people with their own thoughts, emotions and opinions can cause problems. this concept of differentiation to me is a foundational concept and would be …
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 12:54 PM
1

noticed you avoided my point about how deleting and disabling coded elements is not new information. If I have an old transistor radio that doesn't work, I could cut off the cord and use it as a door stop. that's a new function but there's nothing new about it. Same with many/most mutations out there; they tend to disable what's already there. Not only that but mutations tend to cause negative interactions with surrounding genes, thus causing them to lose fitness as well. This happens not only w…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 12:41 PM
1

Well at least you're here and on the right track.....but first of all, from one Christian to another, please don't cheat on your wife. You don't need that. Your marriage and family are too important to risk. Not to mention this kind of thing can damage your faith; happily-sinning does that. Your marriage might not be perfect but it's worth protecting. Part of being RP is standing up and sticking to your guns, defending and celebrating your moral foundation. I wouldn't push this advice onto non-C…
/r/askMRP05/04/17 02:24 AM
1

Yes, it is mutations involved I said "RANDOM" mutations. your theory needs variation to be RANDOM -- it needs nature to somehow shake things up and spit out haphazard variants that arise by pure chance. You can't expect people to believe in universal common descent starting with a primordial bacteria-like-thing if all nature can do is select from pre-existing variants without ever adding new innovation. And this is why the Lenski thing was so exciting to the evo crowd: because it had the appeara…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 01:46 AM
1

i challenged you to give me your best ONE, or at least the one you're most comfortable with debating, and you've as of now chickened out. I don't debate ten links. I'll debate one.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 01:40 AM
1

ah...didn't take long for the name calling. Increases in variety are certainly NOT increases in information. you are obviously clueless as to the argument of behe and others in the ID movement. Mutations can of course cause a change of function, but often (almost always?) this is characterized by a deletion or disabling of a functional element.......https://www.lehigh.edu/bio/Faculty/Behe/PDF/QRB_paper.pdf in other words, mutations tend to break or disable things that already existed. This is NO…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/04/17 01:39 AM
1

I didn't ask for your opinion. I asked for a peer reviewed paper saying genetic information was increased or added. I didn't ask for genetic "variety" or any of that crap. You've managed a fail so far.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 11:55 PM
1

all you have to do is present a paper that claims a mutation adds information. how hard is that?
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 11:26 PM
4

great post....I concur....nearly 3 months into this now and my wife is literally aglow, chronically-cheerful to the point that it's almost crazy. I haven't seen or heard a shit test in probably 3 weeks.... I mean to be honest, I'd actually like her to act up occasionally so some tension could creep in -- and I keep waiting for the chance -- but she's just always so friggin' compliant and happy that it's difficult to set her straight. For one thing she's always asking me what to do and how to do …
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 10:50 PM
1

she needs to do what she believes will work. The placebo effect is real. Likewise the nocebo effect is real (if she believes a treatment won't work then her body will not respond well to it.) You should be on board with what her gut is telling her. She knows more about it (evidently) than you do. On a different level, I have zero faith myself in conventional treatments. Sounds like she's on the same page....conventional treatment (at best) treat the symptoms. They never cure the underlying condi…
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 10:16 PM
1

whatever....just going on what the researcher himself said....also there is no new phenotypic structure there and no paper that will claim new information was had there so what's the point, really...
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 10:03 PM
1

ok it's not "evolution" because there are no random mutations involved that arose spontaneously, as had been the original claim...remember, the claim was that this was a "rare" and "unusual" trait that just "happened," by chance to arise and then be selected. As it turns out there were multiple variants involved (selected) and it happened very quickly. This points to need and purpose and non randomness. No it wasn't the exact same experiment but the outcome was the same, and it happened much qui…
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 09:53 PM
1

The point is that the same result was had in as little as 12 generations. Debunking your "observed" evolution. lol!
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 07:20 PM
1

Just going on what the researcher himself said. "Special mechanism" is his term, which at other times he suggests the trait is pre-existing and is a result plasmids transferring g it. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC525574/
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 07:06 PM
1

I'm trying to debate you. I can't argue against them all at the same time. Pick the one you're most confident about and I'll shoot it down for you.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 06:14 PM
1

I asked for a new structure to the phenotype. I can't argue chemicals. But I can argue organismal evolution. Ion channels are not phenotypic structures, pieces of anatomy
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 06:08 PM
1

There is no "evolution" without a change in the base code, aka mutation. The issue here is whether or not "evolution" did anything in the way of building up life forms. If you read Yomo's paper he says that the evidence does not fit with frame shift mutation.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 06:04 PM
1

I didn't ask for a new function. Mutations do that all the time. I said new structure, not new function. An addition to the phenotype.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 05:14 PM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/26833416/ In regards to the other, which part of the ribosome did it add? Quote the part you think confirms your argument.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 04:57 PM
1

Ah, and your nylon bug as cited (yomo) actually was accomplished horizontally by plasmids, probably not mutations. Didn't add information or any new structure either. You have a habit of throwing crap against the wall and hoping it sticks. It doesn't. The stuff you cite doesn't satisfy my challenge.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 04:30 PM
1

Which one do you believe cites a mutation that adds a new structure to the phenotype or new cellular structure or machine? Let's stick to your best example.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 04:22 PM
1

Clearly you didn't understand the challenge. I didn't asked how the ribosome evolved...as in some theoretical model. I asked for the mutations responsible. Clearly you are into science and know more than I do but clearly you are without example. And the long term lenski thing was repeated more recently and what he said took some 60,000 generations actually took other researchers 12 generations when they repeated the experiment. Clearly not accomplished by random mutations.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 04:04 PM
1

We need to take this to another forum or place. I'd like to get comfortable and shoot your brother Darwinism down officially. I'm a neo-Lamarckian and fully demolish your "examples" of evolution. Will have to wait till later though.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 03:32 PM
1

Why can't you link the best one?
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 03:23 PM
1

Uh where are those mutations? Paper please. And why did I watch that? Talk about just-so stories. Tell me, which small, isolated part of the flagellum evolved first?
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 03:18 PM
1

Working. Don't have time to run around searching for your evidence. If you can't post it here it doesn't exist. ;)
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 02:57 PM
1

Why don't you show me the mutations that created ANY part of the cell; any cellular structure or machine. If evolution were a fact that should be easy. Mutations do all kinds of things ( change eye color, resistance in bacteria, etc) but the don't build new novel structures.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 02:35 PM
1

Show me one of those papers. Link please. Your best one.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 02:25 PM
1

I'm new to Reddit but all I'm doing is hitting "reply". Im on my phone so...don't know.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 02:24 PM
1

Oh my. As if you have a replicator. They're still looking for it. And you can't have a cell without a membrane. All you've got is a few isolated nucleotides. And? And what about the thousands of cellular machines that make functionality possible? A cell cannot be functional and be what you need unless it can consume/use nutrients, expel waste and replicate. It needs hardware for that. So where is it? You don't know. No mutations bring about this stuff. See the problem here you are on the wrong s…
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 02:07 PM
1

Show me the peer reviewed paper showing that any particular mutation adds information or a new, novel body part.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 01:26 PM
1

And that is supposed to convince me of what, exactly? A few amino acids forming peptides means exactly jack. I asked you about the cell forming.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 12:44 PM
1

Oh it's scientific theory, and scientific fact. The fact is, evolution happens. Oh really....please...I'm dying show me any case that proves random mutation (plus natural selection) can add information or build any new functional body part, or even part of one. You've got the whole biosphere to choose from. Any body part from any creature...any cellular structure or machine, anything really. paper please.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 02:55 AM
1

We have solid scientific evidence indicating the origins of the universe, DNA, the cell, etc. more horse shit....give me your scientific evidence that "naturalism" whatever the heck that is, created the cell. Let's start there and we'll see just how full of it you are.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 02:48 AM
2

a little tip from a self-employed guy: Google Adwords is your new best friend; the greatest advertising for the small business owner. Start something...doesn't matter what it is; whatever you like or can do: Lawn mowing. Tree trimming. Fences. painting. Handyman...auto repair....pool cleaning...whatever...you surely have some sort of skill, or can learn one. Find a mentor in whatever field interests you and offer to work for free or a reduced rate while you learn the ropes. Self employment rocks…
/r/askMRP04/04/17 02:19 AM
1

Show me some something dumb-luck-daddy ever did. Anything. Fine-tuned or not. You don't know the origin of anything anywhere. Evolution is a fairy tale. You don't know the origin of DNA, the cell, consciousness or any body part from any creature. It's all a mindless, non scientific theory for atheists.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/04/17 01:09 PM
2

She also went off the rails when I told her I was switching my gym membership from the Y to the local Cross-fit gym " I'm fairly new here and still learning myself but I've learned a couple important things about my wife and sex: 1) sex and respect go hand in hand. If she doesn't respect you the bedroom will be dead. 2) Respect and fear go hand in hand. She will not respect you unless she fears you. So you must be at least somewhat intimidating or she will not respect you and if she has sex with…
/r/askMRP01/04/17 11:52 PM
1

I don't really care to debate someone like you who is ignorant of the basic positions. The multiverse was dreamed up to Get around the fine tuning argument...aka "coincidences"... and there are tons of them. The multiverse is the only way to protect the atheist worldview that physical accidents did it all. If you dont believe this or want to make up your own crappy theories, fine. But in the real world more intelligent minds know better. http://discovermagazine.com/2008/dec/10-sciences-alternati…
/r/MarriedRedPill31/03/17 11:02 PM
1

I'm not assuming that. I'm asking you. Besides it's your side who appeals to the multiverse to get around the fine tuning problem.
/r/MarriedRedPill31/03/17 07:09 PM
1

We're talking origins; the origins of physical laws are either chance-based or intelligence based. Of course the output/consequences of Said physical laws are not chance based.
/r/MarriedRedPill30/03/17 08:13 PM
1

It falls because of a physical law, of which came from something.
/r/MarriedRedPill30/03/17 08:06 PM
0

Maybe you prefer the term horse shit.
/r/MarriedRedPill30/03/17 07:25 PM
1

Yes it all just happened "just because." Your word salad doesn't help you explain anything. Whatever.
/r/MarriedRedPill30/03/17 07:18 PM
1

Somebody forgot to grow up.
/r/askMRP30/03/17 06:52 PM
1

No since you denied that dumb luck did anything I'm trying to figure out what you think did, if not intelligence.
/r/MarriedRedPill30/03/17 12:49 PM
1

Fine tuning is indeed a problem for you but that is not at all what I was talking about. You denied the dumb luck charge. What I'm saying is that origins and causation are either purposeful and intelligent or mindlessly-accidental. There is no other option. If you deny intelligence then you are stuck with dumb luck.
/r/MarriedRedPill30/03/17 03:24 AM
1

You don't even know me. But as to your comment, No I'm no girl. Im fairly new on this journey and and my relationship has blossomed beautifully because of MRP but quite honestly I'm not at all ashamed of some of my blue qualities. At least I admit them, unlike many of the fakes and wanna be alphas here. Can't figure out why men want to be one dimensional and throw out many of the blue qualities that make them human and made their wives fall in love with them in the first place. How boring, fake …
/r/askMRP30/03/17 02:48 AM
1

FYI..."being cold and withdrawing all affection and physical contact," aka pouting, is one of the worst and weakest traits and man can have. Pouting should end now. Even if you feel like pouting, don't let her sense it or know it. Pouting is for kids and immature adults.
/r/askMRP29/03/17 10:44 PM
1

Well it was all either mindful, intelligent, preordained on purpose or physical accidents did it.....take your pick. Do you have another alternative?
/r/MarriedRedPill29/03/17 09:57 PM
1

If the Christian God is false (The Creator of the universe and moral Law Giver) then there are no morals. And there is no truth.....
/r/MarriedRedPill29/03/17 12:22 AM
2

and what's your dumb-luck-did-it daddy ever done. I'd love to see how dumb luck formed time, space, matter, consciousness, dna, cells, the laws of physics, chemistry and everything else involved in creating a unified experience. The idea that lady luck rolled snake eyes trillions and trillions of times to make all this is the height of arrogance and stupidity.
/r/MarriedRedPill29/03/17 12:17 AM
2

a church is a place for sinners....it shouldn't be surprising that sinners attend church. Christ loved the church; not everyone who goes to church is holier than though...some of them would love to have you there; others need you there.
/r/MarriedRedPill29/03/17 12:15 AM
6

Women can't truly relax and settle into their feminine role (submissive role) unless they are being lead by a man they can trust his judgement. And here's the thing: It's one thing to be a leader or show leadership qualities...it's a whole other thing as a leader to be able to make snap decisions and good judgements on the fly about life. This is one of the things that I'm still having to practice because in my past BP life, we often made decisions together; aka, bounce ideas off each other and …
/r/MarriedRedPill28/03/17 11:42 PM
1

Ok. Tks for sharing.
/r/MarriedRedPill28/03/17 01:43 AM
1

what instrument do you play? do you write? record?...what else can you tell me? I love music too...play guitar, write songs, post on youtube, etc...mostly rock/pop stuff. I'm a nerd for old 60s and 70s rock.
/r/MarriedRedPill27/03/17 11:06 PM
2

Great subject, brilliantly-written. In regard to the topic of commands....and this is no exaggeration: I have gained a new, glowing, giddy wife when I started telling her what to do (and what not to do). Between that and using the magical word "no," these two techniques have given us a whole new dynamic. She is not even the same person anymore...in fact, she's so friggin' happily-compliant and eager to take directions that sometimes it's hard to gin up any friction at all, which is needed for se…
/r/TheRedPill27/03/17 04:13 AM
3

The Creator of the Universe does not = "sky daddy." If you believe all this just dumb-lucked itself into existence then you are a fool. The atheist worldview is the epitome of luck, which nobody in their right mind believes can create intelligence, complexity, beauty and purpose.
/r/MarriedRedPill26/03/17 02:43 PM
2

fairy tales like being a mutated fish?
/r/MarriedRedPill26/03/17 02:40 PM
1

"The hardest battle has already been won by Christ." Amen to that.
/r/MarriedRedPill26/03/17 12:10 AM
3

explain them? I believe submissiveness of wives is a virtue....a wife who is submissive is a wife who celebrates and makes the most of her role...a submissive wife helps make her the best wife she can be and makes her husband the best husband he can be. And this is regardless of the fact that The Bible tells women to submit to their husbands.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/03/17 03:05 AM
2

thanks...that's a good one....but mine was much simpler. 2 things changed it: Turns out my wife likes to be told what to do. She thrives on it....makes her giddy and eager to comply. Who knew? The word "no" has superpowers. It lays boundaries, shows who the boss is, and builds tension. And that's pretty much it. At least the big things....yea I lift now, live life better, clean house more often, am more integrated in the daily decisions, but those are really side items that I do for me, just bec…
/r/MarriedRedPill24/03/17 12:28 AM
2

actually wives submit to honor God and honor their husbands, not because they're afraid to go to hell. It's a love thing.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/03/17 12:19 AM
2

"So, basically she only has sex with you when she feels like it" uh, no...I get it any time I want it....her "I have a headache" routine doesn't work if I really want it. Headache or not, the door gets closed and locked; and if that happens she knows what that means.....again, she almost never says "no," headache or not. Having said that, I much prefer sex when she's fully into it, so I generally try to make it happen when there's already an organic sexual tension going on.... I mean why waste i…
/r/MarriedRedPill24/03/17 12:03 AM
2

agreed...the church, as the western world as a whole, has been feminized to a ridiculous extreme. Turns out my wife was honoring God by being submissive to me (she's always been extremely submissive) but I hadn't been honoring God by being a good man or a true leader....lots of sitting around like a log at night watching tv or on computer, not being active, not being helpful around the house, not spending enough time with the kids, not making many decisions, basically not being alive. It ticks m…
/r/MarriedRedPill23/03/17 11:37 PM
2

lol. I get sex anytime I want it. That's better than many/most people here. Not only that but my wife is pretty much like a giddy school girl around me nowadays. Our dynamic is electric and we are living the sweet life together. So I don't need to argue about this or explain my actions because whatever I'm doing and have done in the past couple months actually works in the real world, or at least my world, and has changed our lives.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/03/17 10:24 PM
2

I'm just telling you how it is. Not bragging. Not trying to make a point. And I'm not missing the point of RP for that matter by stating our relationship guides and boundaries, which were set by God and long before RP. Biblical principles line up quite nicely with RP. I like this forum but it would be nice if success stories were common here. Sometimes I like hearing what's actually worked and how lives have been changed as opposed to what's not working or commentary on whats been done wrong. It…
/r/MarriedRedPill23/03/17 12:49 PM
1

Yea I'm in the ft worth area. You?
/r/MarriedRedPill22/03/17 11:56 PM
2

I'm amazed at how many mens' wives in here regularly decline sex. Didn't know I was so unique. But even before RP my wife rarely actually said 'no," at least not in the serious way. (Sometimes her "nos" are half-hearted, sweet and flirty). We are Christians and I guess that's one of the perks of that; wives are to submit to their husbands. We've had talks about this, and contrary to what many in here say, a wife who regularly refuses her husband is actually deflating his confidence. Guys in here…
/r/MarriedRedPill22/03/17 11:53 PM
10

Some of us enjoy and feed off the success stories. Theyre motivating, conformational and there needs to be more of them here. Better than the same old crap day in day out.
/r/MarriedRedPill22/03/17 11:20 PM
1

Well all you can is what you can do. Buying organic doesn't automatically mean the food is perfectly pesticide or chemical free but it's probably a better option than consuming food that's guaranteed to be sprayed. Personally I don't want round-up sprayed on my salad greens. This is what's causing depression, auto immune disorders, obesity, anger problems, ADHD, on and on. What is otherwise known as gluten sensitivity is probably just a reaction to the RoundUp sprayed on the wheat. Humans have e…
/r/MarriedRedPill20/03/17 10:19 PM
2

My wife and I work out every other night at the gym....even though we do our own routines and work out separately, we're up there together and supporting each other. I would suggest that you invite her to start working out with you...lifting weights may also boost her metabolism and help her shed her tummy. Then, if and when she shows any improvement -- and I mean ANY improvement -- compliment the heck out of her and tell her how beautiful she is. Also get you both on a diet consisting of mostly…
/r/MarriedRedPill20/03/17 09:59 PM
2

my wife and I like finding new places to walk/hike together. We like walking in and around creeks, ponds and anywhere there are trails in nature. It's fun to come across turtles, ducks, etc... If you do a search there's probably internet sites that will have a list of places to hike near you. And most importantly, aside from the exercise, there's something healthy and sweet about just being together and talking....walking and talking at the same time is very much more of a bonding experience tha…
/r/MarriedRedPill19/03/17 05:04 PM
1

as a new subscriber, GAWD the posts are boring. Same crap day after day.... Where are the success stories? There are surely thousands of them....some of us out here would love to read them....I saw one the other day -- a guy thanking the red pill for saving his sex life and marriage -- but I guess that post got deleted..... I saw a post the other day from a guy who was trying to talk a guy out of cheating on his wife....He got banned for bringing morals into the equation...then others got condem…
/r/MarriedRedPill17/03/17 02:01 AM
5

I am new to this forum but my experience is that simply ignoring the tests doesn't generally work. Instead it's better to act like a seasoned politician and spin the situation in a way that will neutralize her anger and then point her in a different direction. Good politicians, good men, don't ignore and walk away from controversial topics or accusations; they "address" them by smoothly spinning and redirecting. Merely walking away will do nothing but allow her to stew over it.
/r/MarriedRedPill13/03/17 05:04 PM
5

"princess." good one...sounds like a good neutralizer to use and still keep your edge.....I'll be using that.
/r/MarriedRedPill13/03/17 12:39 AM
1

I thought I was the only one. I never ask or hint or make gestures or anything... I just get up and go lock the bedroom door. She knows what that means.
/r/MarriedRedPill12/03/17 05:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter