TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Thad_Ferenc Archive

View 2 posts and 122 comments by Thad_Ferenc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Your point would only be relevant jn the case of full on inkwells. Its a cumulative effect If they've had a girlfriend at all, ever, she's driven the male friends away. Ive had this bad experience and mosg men have and i am now justified in hating women. Sound familiar?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 11:50 AM
–

Women purposefully isolate their husbands from their friends. Evo psych reasons are they want their husband to show complete and utter commitment to them and male friends clash with that. This is observed frequently and is the lived experience of most men. It is common knowledge and you surely know this
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 11:33 AM
–

??? You seem like a boomer. Boomers love Dave Ramsey. You must answer for every controversial thing Dave Ramsey ever did Your logic
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 04:16 AM
–

Seriously? https://rp.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1tez1t3/women_dont_have_life_easier_than_men/ lots of rhe same people now contradicting themselves shamelessly. women fare better with support systems because women's issues are internal more frequently and even if external they can just change their outlook on the situation to cope. A man can have someone telling him its all right but if the objective situation isn't all right, they will not be reassured.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 04:13 AM
–

This is not a serious person, sadly. Low-tier attempting to guilt you for perceived emotions is one thing. But she also holds alarming misandrist views based on stats about male violence she made up and when challenged retreats to 'Muh personal experience'. She at other times like here describes intense revulsion towards men generally. But, through perhaps some mental gymnastics and the help of hormonal swings, has convinced herself not that 'if you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail' b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 04:08 AM
–

Frankly you hold incredibly misandrist views, such as elsewhere asserting most (>50%) of men physical abusers of women and that women's collective hatred of men is justified. When challenged on your basis for this, you assert 'just vibes' or 'personal experience', but men hating women on such basis is not acceptable to you. You have at other times described intense revulsion you hold towards men you encounter and are saying similar thing here. Just verbally asserting 'i care about men' does not …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 04:03 AM
–

Yes. Idk what you're on about because he's not popular here on either side.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 03:54 AM
–

The mainstream presuppositons of society are feminist. The supply of great female inventors and creators is far less than the demand for them. Hence, rhere is going to be a lot of deceptive emphasis on when exactly breakthroughs occurred, giving credit inconsistently to the inventors of a precursor to a product, versus who manages to mass produce a product, etc (whichever was a woman gets credit as 'the inventor'). The fundamental axiom of woman good, man bad is not changed. I do not say this to…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 03:21 AM
–

Men have invented the vast majority of every product. Your cope comment only had like 6 things, many of them obscure and not used daily and many of them were made up (not even a popular misconception on a few) Anyway, that whole gambit was off topic. Feminist campaigners (aside from the chick who tried to kill Andrew Warhol) faced no personal consequences for their activism. They were handed their wins. This is why this whole 'men are to blame for not rising up' comes across like a 5 year old ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 01:31 AM
–

Reddit moment. Love that you can scrounge together half dozen highly sus things that debatedly have female inventors. Some of these are outright lies, others are either closely derivative of very similar inventions, but the women gets credit to astroturf examples of female achievement. Once again, you prove my point, men gave you everything, including these trendy talking points, presumably Ada Lovelace = mostly fake. Leibniz had mechanical algorithms hundreds of years before. She was also was g…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 01:18 AM
–

His summary of "substance is glazing women" is accurate with regard to your comment. He is wanting to imitate the unflattering aspects of your character and behavior in order to reap unearned benefits and privileges as you do. Not that hard to understand (?)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:10 AM
–

Collective punishment for thee but not for me I see. A plurality of young men voted for him out of a minority that even voted. The White women who made that meme, of course, are from a demographic that voted for him heavily.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:04 AM
–

You are on to something. Society in practice regards women as morally superior because the only values we have left are care versus harm. Women are marginally better at this then men. The other values civilizations MUST have to function : self sacrifice, loyalty, are basically 100% male at this point. Look at the dangerous jobs, look at the divorce rate. To add insult to injury, men are ridiculed if they retreat from these virtues.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:02 AM
–

Literally every feminist victory was handed to you by men directlyon a silver platter, or by technological advances made by men. You earned nothing of the benefits you have today.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:57 PM
–

Wait. Didn't you all upvote a post a few days ago explaining women have dramatically worse mental health issues than men and are not doing so well at all and were Not coping so well? 🤔🤔🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:56 PM
–

In what way are men not holding up their end of the bargain? The example you give about not being (sole) breadwinner was done at the express request of the feminist movement. So to the bring that up smacks of 'men are to blame for not stopping feminists from making a mistake!' Also: derailment. You referenced thousands of years of misogyny. I say most men dedicated their lives to the comfort and convenice of women, a point which was not addressed. To this day men serve in ALL the dangerous occup…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:33 PM
–

Very much an indictment on the general abstraction ability of Bluepill feminist women that this gets so many likes. Women physically good at shooting but are physically weaker in terms of leveraging those guns into actual violence. This is literally the point being made against you that you concede.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 10:46 PM
–

Pretending the sky is green and the grass is blue to own the my soggy kneeists. Phone plans don't require proof of address anymore lol. I just got a new one. You have to reach for increasingly obscure or fabricated examples to justify the "ought" of your ideology. Sad
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:12 PM
–

Meme history slop. Before you run back with isolated examples i can find countless guys denied credit cards because of clerical issues too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:10 PM
–

You guys realize that scoff and ridicule is not an argument, right? I understand it is rhetorically useful for the zeitgeist ideology to do this, but it is of 0 substance
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:09 PM
–

Millions of men died and still do, to provide women they love with more resources and a comfortable life. There was always some reciprocation or return of favor by women, but now women are systematically attempting to remove those obligations, while maintaining the obligations of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:07 PM
–

Does this standard apply to women's issues? Your view 'it shouldn't be a thing' therefore 'stfu about it' / 'you're not allowed to complain about it' So if a man just verbally affirms things feminists are worried about (grape is bad, harassment is bad, men shouldnt abondon their children, or whatever ), then men have no blame for anything and you guys should just pipe down about it? And if you dont, you have some weird obsession with said issues?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:02 PM
6

You won't understand or acknowledge this because of solipsism (it doesn't effect you directly , therefore it doesn't exist) - but young men in Germany require permission of the armed forces to leave: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/05/uproar-germany-law-men-up-to-45-military-permission-long-stays-abroad This is quite an egregious restriction on bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 09:34 PM
0

You guys all claim to have experienced brutal male violence but then make silly statements like this- exposing the LARP. Unless you go in and completely waste a guy immediately, lightly armed people can be overpowered physically.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:24 PM
2

You are a misandrist and you are lying. Female leaders are more violent than men Abrotion kills millions of the most defenseless people each year (even if counting only late term, fully formed fetuses). LesbIan DV is statically not different than straight men's DV (and gay dude DV is much lower !) All this indicates, if given the opportunity and possessing power over the victim, as he said, women are just as violent as men And in close quarters, if one doesn't automatically waste someone, people…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:18 PM
1

that is not at all a gotcha question. This is probably a fruitless endeavor on my part as most of you believe you are allowed to contradict yourself BUT if women are equally capable of violence, but just becaude theyre morally superior (TM) dont commit violence, this question tests your basic consistency. Why, if women can commit violence via Gun equal to men, would they not be valuable to the military in times of crisis,? Your point about generally physical fitness conceeds the point. This is h…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:10 PM
1

Lol. Lmao even. You've only seen violence on TV. Armed people can be physically overpowered and disarmed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:05 PM
2

Do you have stats If you looked at this type of murder on its own? Do men poison and kill in their sleep wives more than the other way around? If you remove crimes of impulse, it may be women are equally violent as men. I.e. they are equally violent as men when given the opportunity. I doubt this has been examined but Late term Abrotion is killing a lot of defenseless babies. Also lesbian DV rates (even when doing cope hocus pocus) are statistically insignicantly different than straight men. Gay…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 07:55 PM
1

Maybe its useful for entertainment but its not going to be fruitful because solipsism. Theyre going to just say 'well I dont believe misandrist stuff' and be unable to abstract that we see more than just them, we see the broader feminist rhetoric too. But solipsism
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:38 PM
0

Slop post. Not honestly engaging with the stuff you are spammed with daily here. -Circumcision (bodily autonomy) -C0nscription (bodily autonomy. young men cant leave Germany btw) -Sentencing disparity -Homelessness driven by funding disparities -Laws constructed so men cannot be victims of s3x crimes by wimmin or DV by women
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:37 PM
–

Yep. It actually occurs on this sub a lot. -if an RPer makes a woe is me post, fishing for sympathy from women. -then BPers gloat and mock, telling him he well forever be alone for biological reasons, they physinogomy post (you're ugly therefore you are a bad person), and sometimes brag about their betabuxx husbands being at their Beck and call. -if an RPer makes an effort-post, suddenly all that stuff isnt real. Just improve yourself bro and you'll find a GF. Actually men are hypergamous so you…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:28 PM
–

Yep. Revealed preference is undefeated.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:12 PM
3

Again, allergy to meta level analysis in set up. You're baking in presuppositions then just claiming objectivity. So statement x becomes more common over time. If you cant assess whether statement x is misogynistic or misandrist, your study isnt telling us what you claim it can tell us You could just present it neutrally. 'Sentiment x is more common over time'- but you canNOT make a judgement on it or draw a conclusion with regard to misandry or misogyny being on the rise. You are modding a sub …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:26 PM
1

Alright well you should've waited till it was done to post this and not done a trailer of a handful of examples w/ a 'trust me bro' bit Also no answer on the funding. NGOs love these sort of shock studies, and the New Statesman one was anti zeitgeist enough they need to counter it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:10 PM
3

This is kind of why social science has become a meme. You guys are allergic to meta level analysis in your setup. You have a spectrum, OK. Crudely, Is there an objective, consistent, criteria to say 'this post is 9/10 misogyny' or 'this post is egalitarian'? Its not like testing a temperature, or a distance. Even in consumer research, if I am observing a guy testing a tractor, I am going to have a checklist of criteria to check what he does /doesn't say. I'm not going to just 'vibe it out'. So m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:04 PM
2

Who funds it ? Are you analyzing key words and phrases? What is your criteria for misogyny and misandry? Also, are you trying to test your claim that all the edge-lords dont think theyre misogynistic? (I.e. edge lord makes woman hating post, then later says 'i love women'
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:56 PM
4

Yes but you didn't answer those questions in your method. At all. You keep hinting at you having the answers to it but then never present that evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:52 PM
3

What's your criteria for what counts as hateful posts? Because in this very thread on a sub that's presumably majority red pill aligned, women saying a majority of men are abusers and grapists. Similarly, recent posts went mega viral: man versus bear, I've seen one where a guy is celebrating adopting a baby girl and a comment of 'check his hard drive' went viral. There's been a big uptick on youtube about Boy-Moms insinuating gr00ming, and mocking the boys for it. This is all hateful rhetoric. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:47 PM
2

I didnt engage with that becuade it's absurd, i wanted to steel man. But since you are going to die on that hill- in addition to all the more normal misandrist stuff on here, you also see men as very dumb. Got it. Men can believe women are evil and should be slaves in the kitchen but are too dumb to realize that's a 'negative opinion'. You also provided no evidence that your cherry picked women hating dudes don't believe theyre misogynistic. Its mental gymnastics. The more clear, straightforward…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:59 AM
–

Wtf? Weird piety signaling in your bottom paragraph. This is a typical distraction and derailment tactic. He didn't say men should be allowed to do this. He just said this is bad and a double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 04:12 AM
–

To deny the your bottom paragraph would be textbook arbitariness. If demographic A does x its a crime, but demographic B does x its a harmless funny meme, is arbitrary. To deny this is to allow for redpillers to be open misogynists and women haters. After all, if you can judge genders differently for the same offenses, why cant we judge women as evil and irreddsmmable for basic human foibles?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 04:04 AM
–

Idk if Seth Rogan is a writer for SNL but it's apparently a constant theme in anything he writes
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:49 AM
–

We are at a point with 'the deservening' where any lack of attraction by a man towards a handsy woman in authority, is a faux pas or offense by the man. Don't you see, the women deserves your arousal at her groping (cause after all, most guys would be), and failure to give it to her is a a sign of defect on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:46 AM
–

Yes, you are a contributor to the double standard. Funny how collective standards against grape victims 'teen boys all want sex' are ok when it benefits women. What if the woman is not attractive to the boy (as a double digit % of women are to most men) and he does not consent?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:41 AM
–

When there's no ambiguity or it's beyond mere insensitivity, as this is, isn't it just a 'humiliation ritual'? It is Openly flaunting that the mainstream zeitgeist isnt about gender equality as they claim to be. What other explanation is there? top down stuff that's this on the nose unsettles many naive BPers too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:10 AM
1

Yes, if we assume honest responses not influenced by fear of repercussion, that is what men and women are saying about each other. But I really dont see how that necessarily gets at objective truth. I can easily think of a few RP responses. The women who say 'men's monstrosities > their utility' ignore men doing the dangerous and self sacrificing occupations. They may also have incorrect assessments of the extent of male monstrosities based on social media memes. Women are not omniscient. More o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:48 AM
3

To be charitable you probably could've included divorce stats and women's behavior in marriage as other reasons for RP, plus a handful of guys that got abused by wimmin as children..... but what i was trying to sus out is if you do the 'and then one day for no reason at all' shtick with regard to the rise in red pill and misogyny, which you didn't
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:56 AM
2

I'm agnostic on your post. My intuition is that for all the alleged shodiness in the initial study, your way of gleaning new info is just as shoddy if not more so, bht what do I know, you claim to be an expert. Anyway. I wish it were true becos women's comical degree of in-group preference need countered by men's own in - group preference. My issue though is if we accept that young men are really misogynist but lie in surveys, but young women dont lie about their misandry in surveys, that strong…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:46 AM
2

Alright, fair enough, you are being consistent here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:22 AM
1

The "one who got away" for me always said stuff like what you said in the bottom paragraph. But I would argue it's extremely rare, because it requires a woman to have such a degree of introspection as to disregard external adulation and validation (romantic and physical attention from men, even high value men, and the p ussy pass itself)- reject it, and seek to find meaning through other things you do for yourself and others. That is an extremely rare sentiment. I would also ask, are you a Chris…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:14 AM
1

Ah ok. So you are saying men are treated as individuals by women (whether good or bad or neutral) while women are treated by men as interchangeable (with other women in their attractiveness bracket?)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:09 AM
1

And the issue too is that you shluld br careful what you wish for. being valued for your skill or 'soul quality' would mean many women are judged much worse than they are now. It makes perfect sense, if there's a normal distribution of virtues among women, there's going to be some that are unvirtuous but nice looking and therefore get a 'p ussy pass'. The issue is many of this specific subset of women, who just get a pass to bypass meritocracy, lecture inkwells about their own lack of merit. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:18 AM
1

Yes to a degree. Specifically with regards to the rich guy and dating up with men who have resources, those men rise to the top not because they are most moral, but rather quite the opposite (law of the jungle, dog eat dog, con artistry and fraud, etc). This is ironically the belief of most feminists, who are left wing economically, but then rich guys are arbitrarily deemed good men if you want to date them and argue with red pillers online. With regards to the simp who does free work for his fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:04 AM
1

Good for you man 👍. That's what we all should do more often. Redpillers here have inconsistencies too. Honestly Redpill-sympathetic people here tend to come here to get women to validate their suffering, which ironically is a very anti red-pill and gynocentric thing to do. Ironically, the cruel dismissals and emotional inanities from the Blue Pillers in response then reinforce their red pill beliefs ('woman cruel and hate you if not Chad, woman extremely solipsistic, emotional and arbitrary') cr…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:56 PM
1

They're all more so designed to enforce what you want to hear more than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:47 PM
1

What
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:43 PM
9

Still Begging the question. You wouldn't just believe a random claim i made if I asserted it without support. You dont do it to redpillers collectively here. I see no need to grant you or women broadly this concession which is not granted to us. Some degree of Skepticism and subjecting claims to adverse questioning is a major enlightenment principle btw
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:41 PM
2

Very good point. You sometimes see them try to do a revealed preference bit (automarically illegitimate when done to women though) that everyone innately assumes men are more violent than women. Which i would conceed is true, but that's 100% consistent with a vanisingly small prrcent of men being violent but an even smaller % of women
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:24 PM
4

This woman may be your juror someday fellas and ladies. May G-d have mercy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:21 PM
3

Sauce?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:15 PM
3

My point is if they literally do the meme "Women are shorter than men on average" "That's not true because my mom is tall" As was done here, Then they are unqualified to vote. Don't see many counterexamples of redpillers doing thus
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:13 PM
4

Citation needed on 21% of men doing that stuff. Also, Citation cannot be reliant on self-reporting or else you are begging the question (The assumption that % of wimmin claiming SA = the same % of men doing it is also an unjustifiable assumption. Plus those studies also show double digit % of men reporting SA, and it is again begging the question to assume they are all assaulted by other men)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:10 PM
5

The problem is that if men liking women because they are mesmerized by the puss, then turns out to somehow be not really fondness or doesn't count, then the same standard can be applied to women liking men as a utility also. One could disqualify the women who have positive or neutral views of men as just having a positive view because their male friends perform handy man work for them, they snagged a rich boyfriend who buys them nice things, or their dad built them a tree house as a child, and h…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:01 PM
4

I didn't say women generally shouldn't vote, I mean you. Ideally I'd like to see eligibility for c0nscription as a requirement for them to vote generally, though. Also, you can't seem to help yourself from falling in the same contradiction we discussed above. You accept, naively, self reports of my soggy knee from women but dont accept self-reports of misandry that men report. This is arbitrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 07:47 PM
3

This is all promised on the idea to dismiss self reporting, which is good. But the question remains, why are the men in the survey not comfortable self -reporting misogyny but rhe women are comfortable reporting misandry? Doesn't that deboonk patriarchy theories and prove the zeitgeist is feminist?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 07:11 PM
9

So lets get this straight -Scientific Study shows women hate men more than men hate them -that's anti zeitgeist, and cant stand -you go to social media and unscientifcally cherry-pick some men hating on women, claiming it overrules a scientific study. -it is rationalized by saying the men in the survey fear the social consequences of admitting they hate women. -yet, of course the women feel comfortable being openly misandrist, despite living in a misogynistic man's world, for some strange reason…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 06:56 PM
13

Sorry bro. Ive been explicitly told here multiple times women are allowed to have and defend whatever revealed preference they want, no matter how contradictory it is to their claimed beliefs in ideology. Woman goodism is their ultimate and foremost principle, come what may.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 06:35 PM
–

After every comment I see from you, i say: https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/012/490/fe0.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 06:14 PM
10

Seems you are naively accepting misandrists' claims as to their reasoning for being misandrist, but ignoring the misogynists' claims as to their reasoning for being misogynist. You guys really, really struggle with basic internal consistency. If you blindly accept misandrist self-reporting, you should do the same for misogynist self-reporting. It is arbitrary and question begging to not do so. What's good for the goose is good for the gander
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 05:49 PM
8

The fact that a female mod even posts this is indicative of differences between male-female psychology. She doesn't really feel the need to maintain the image of impartiality. She regularly can be down in the gutter doing 'but i know a tall woman' posts like this and posts compiling social media screenshots of wives whining about their husbands not getting anything for them for mother's day (to pwn men), then expect us to just accept her objectivity and authoritah in other cases. The equivalent …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 05:31 PM
5

Ok, so women's misandry is caused by internet edgelords and IRL violence. What is men's misogyny, which you say is more common than we realized, caused by? Do you hold hyper-charitable and hyper-nuanced opinions of what causes them to think that way?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 05:19 PM
–

FYI for everyone. She is outright lying about the dr aft or is seriously misinformed. This stuff is BP feminist cope that needs to die. There has not been a continuous dr aft since pre 19th amendment. The WWI iteration ended after WWI. The dra ft was more or less continous from its resurrection on the eve of World War II to 1975. During this time, multiple wars were declared with women as the MAJORITY of voters, sending those drafted to combat. The current form, instituted in 1978, has been uphe…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 02:52 AM
–

Yeah I mean overall the original post was actually reasonable because it didn't LARP about women's oppression, or solipsistically deny or dismiss men's issues as usual BP posts do. it is more focused on outcomes, which is a unique approach. Ultimately, though, turning muh childbirth and muh pregnancy (occurring, purely by woman's choice, for an average of less than 2 years total over her lifetime where a man is expected to greatly assist her in anyway he can) into the most horrible and harmful t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 02:43 AM
–

Muh underdetermination of data You may be correct But I suggest these FTMs were told/propagandized into wanting to escape at all costs, and eventually realize it was counterproductive and irrational once getting the male experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 02:31 AM
–

I took an unscientific survey of people who probably agree with me to begin with and turns out they all agree with me I took a poll of a group of people fed feminist presuppostitions since the age of sentience, and they all agreed with Feminist presuppositions the ability of women here to shamelessly feign low IQ is...interesting. I suppose this is one way women influence men, LARPing as dumb and incompetent and therefore innocent, to get their way There are laws explicitly against men in this c…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 01:56 AM
–

Maybe he's using a more narrow definition of essential and you're derailing with irrelevant inaninities (as 90% of bluepiller responses on this sub are) about less essential jobs ?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:35 PM
1

I think you don't understand the point. Men and women both can be ranked from 1-10, with 10% at each score. Imagine a lineup of 10 men, ranked by attractiveness relative to each other. The third most attractive man is an 8/10 by ranked. The same is done to 10 women. You are a 4/10 by rank. You go on a date with the man. You tell your friends you are dating down and dating a 3/10, when he really ranks 8/10. This has been documented as what women do on dating apps. To special plead and say a media…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:30 PM
–

While i agree one night standing a woman is not honoring her or a sign of deep love for her, your comment makes little sense because a normal guy trying to rizz and bed a woman isnt intending on harming her body. He's just indifferent to it at worse but all things being equal he'd prefer to give her pleasure.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 10:55 PM
1

You are not self aware enough to understand when you see what you think is a 3/10 man with a 6/10 woman (or whatever)- the man is not really a 3/10. In a lineup of 10 representative men, you'd rank him as 3rd or 4th most attractive (7 or 8 out of 10). You just slap the label of unattractive on men who'd you rank relatively as median attractiveness. Many such cases
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 10:45 PM
–

Woman pursuing men to provide them with money may still have jobs. Just not ones that pay as well as the guy. That's only one of the points. A guy can date a woman making 10x what he makes and the other points would be true
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 10:39 PM
–

Surveys 100% reliant on self-reported answers to: 'do u do good thing or bad thing?' Such as the household chores ones are are not something anyone should take seriously. And the solpisim thing is based on numerous examples i have seen IRL so even if the women are attempting to be honest in assessing what housework they do, many seem have a mental block from accurately doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 10:23 PM
–

Its not very much of a leap at all. If you naively assume "4/10 woman not hypergamous because she pursues 3/10 man on dating app" as the study does, but that 3/10 man she ranks as more 2nd most attractive out of 10, then it's still hypergamy. 3/10 is just a label she slaps on him but it doesn't actually correspond to her own ranking of him relative to other men. OkCupid is similar. They refuse to adjust for this, but they at least do discuss it some. So I mean this is literally an example of why…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 09:24 PM
–

OK, so I am willing to retract any claims that 80-20 is for sure true in dating apps in terms of matches only. That's not to say its been thoroughly deboonked, that is an outright lie, because there is not really any solid data I can find in either direction. (AI and secondary sources everywhere mention blog posts from OKCupid in 2014, and Hinge in 2021, no longer available which have curiously been censored....) Now this study does address hypergamy (pursuing more attractive profiles) https://p…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 04:55 PM
–

The unpaid labor point never seemed meaningful to me because women control the vast vast majority of household spending, and did even in the time Karl Marx came up with the idea. So women are quite literally being compensated for that "unpaid" labor. And again, once outdoor and maintenance work is required, I maintain men do a vast majority of household labor. Even in your own experience I wonder how much solipsism plays a role? When you were younger you were presumably at home with your mother,…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 04:01 PM
–

I'm working from memory here until I do a deeper dive but when i say "widely accepted" I mean they are figures accepted and propagated by feminist and feminist -adjacent sources like the major national newspapers
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:53 PM
–

I dont havr time now but i will try to post a deep dive later today. Its not as stark as 80-20 but the general idea is correct. Id refer to the widely accepted figure of 30% of women 18-30 are single but 65% of men in thr same agre group are. Off thr top of my head women only swipe on 4-15% of guys on the apps but guys swipe on 35-50% of women. A lot of even more stark data from the dating apps in the late 2010s were censored due to fear it would motivate inkwell violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:53 PM
–

Why are 65% of men between 18 and 30 single and only 30% of women? You project your own copium addiction onto us. The answers of 'Muh age gap relationships' as if fully a 1/3 of women 18-30, who on average in their early 20s are dating men 30+ is just asserted because you want it to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:40 PM
–

Yes. Literally every single couple where I am privy to knowing how they divide labor has the man performing dramatically more household labor. Without exception. If the man has some sort of an issue where he cant do this, the woman becomes angry and considers leaving. And this makes sense, as women rarely help in outdoor chores and maintenance tasks, then demand indoor chores be split 50-50. I live in a rural area so I suppose it hypothetical could be more equitable in an area with less outdoor …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:25 PM
–

Men do not steer all conversations about unrelated matters back to 'entitlement' and 'You don't deserve X' and 'how dare you expect something from me for doing what you're required to do' And BTW pushback needs to actually address the points being made and not lazily strawman it with projection of your own faults (entitlement) which so frequently happens
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:26 AM
–

Men outnumber women significantly on every major dating app except maybe bumble
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:12 AM
8

Less than 1% of men ever commit a violent crime yet collective statements about men are made becos of their behavior regularly on this very sub
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:29 AM
1

25?? Although there is a cut off where the "purpose of sex" becomes irrelevant it's not 25. I don't even think there's increased risk of childbirth complications at 25. Maybe 35.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:25 AM
–

Kids take commercials seriously and will be strongly influenced by the worldview commercials inculcate into them as adults. As implied by Igor when he refences a teenage boy seeing said commercials This bad faith, feigning ignorance type stuff is what the drives growth of red pill
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:19 AM
0

Seriously. Although a lot of things are essential, Society needs Power Plants, transmission and water (all 95%+ guys) a lot more than hospitals There's really no essential occupation that's majority female other than nursing. I suppose warehousing and manufacturing are close to 50-50 but trucking is 90%+ guys Case in point: Fat Blumpf's nuclear option against eye ran is bombing these things and not nurses. They would be cruel wouldn't bring their society to its knees like power plants This is re…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:13 AM
0

<Insert Yes Chad meme>
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 10:19 PM
15

Good find. And this is absolutely fair game and relevant to bring up in matters of collective guilt. Why does a man have collective guilt for the tiny fraction of violent men, when there's causal no link to his and their behavior? Many women do reward the violent behavior and literally select it to propagate in future generations and hence in some sense share guilt for it
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 05:07 PM
–

If that's even true, that serves BP because it poisons the well against RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 03:24 PM
–

I hope so. Seems like Female lawlessness is being deprioritized compared to men. Many such cases!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 03:17 PM
–

Don't market yourself as a neutral forum if rules only apply to one side.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 03:16 PM
7

Do you typically treat objects with kindly care and consideration above that which you treat people? This is why feminism is a meme. Literally prioritizing women is somehow mental gymnastic-ed into oppression and misogny
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 03:06 PM
–

Why are flagrant violations of rule 8: 'Top Level Posts must disagree with OP's position' allowed when the OP's position is blue-pill oriented, but violating comments removed in threads that re Red Pill oriented? 🤔🤔🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 03:01 PM
–

I think you know better than this. What is "ugly" and "unattractive" differ between men and women. ugly + unattractive women from men's perspective, those women who would be rejected even if they came onto a guy? certainly less than half of women ugly + unattractive men from women's perspective? 80% So no, it's not really hypocrisy on men's part. I've never actually heard an argument to the looksmatch thing other than just screeching about "entitlement" or some other inane distraction that doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 03:46 AM
–

A "no u" to hypergamy claims Actually guys men are hypergamous 80-20ers 😆
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:41 AM
–

That makes no sense because over time men are going to realize they get few matches and have fewer options (there are more of them than women) and will start swiping near indiscrimantely. Like every other study since then. Again, this may be useful to keep your allies in line but no good faith person seriously entertains this
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:40 AM
–

notice she can't distinguish between the actual claim "nice guys finish last" and the tone by which the claim is made or the person who is making it. Its really quite sad at this point. They don't argue against the claim. They just aumme its some gross and fire bresthing inkwell making the claim and deflect onto the fact it is made a gross inkwell Peak emotional argumentation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:36 AM
–

Lol. Lmao even. 'Actually guys, 80% of men only select the top 20% of women', when now men outnumber women on all dating apps, except possibly bumble, how does that even work? There are journal studies suggesting the opposite. Plus you can literally just create fake profiles to test. Who do you attempt.to.win over by this? The Blue Pill retreat into "I'm going to pretend the sky is green to win internet points" is imperial chutzpah
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:25 AM
–

What you'll notice about these types (feminists) is deep down they really don't see contradictions as something undesirable or something to avoid. Hegemonic ideologies tend to just speak power to truth and not have any need to justify themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:46 AM
–

OK but that's not relevant to what i said. I explicitly refer to intentional selection of aggressive men or purposefully overriding red flags to select them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 05:30 PM
3

Law of the jungle for thee but not for me
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 05:25 PM
1

Yep. All this content where women imply that their sexual whims are what keep the species from dying out assume that women have perfect omnsiscience and instincts as to what is a good trait for survival or not
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 05:17 PM
1

I don't know if that's true in academic circles. But certainly the pop level understanding of natural selection as narrowly being 'those who are able to flee from lions survivr to pass on their genes' is distinct from sexual selection. Women do not have some gnosis that gives them certainty as to what traits will he desirable in future generations. They can and frequently do make a mistake. Small framed Women who liked big muscular guys and then as a result died in childbirth also 'naturally sel…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 05:08 PM
1

Technically all of that is natural selection because natural selection is tautological. Survival of the fittest where fittest are "those who survive". Pop level people redefine natural selection to mean being adept at avoiding Lions or something, when the concept is far broader. Women like OP also think it entails some mystical power on their part
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 04:56 PM
2

I get your point natural selection is a tautological concept to begin with that doesn't even really allow for the idea of dysgenism "Survival of the fittest" where "fittest" is defined as those who survive
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 04:49 PM
1

Your preference in men could be you 'naturally selecting' yourself out of the gene pool if you pick incorrectly. Indeed when there is an environmental or societal change, as there argubaly is now. Your genes tell you to select for something that will soon be less useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 04:47 PM
–

Why has every single comment agreeing with the post been deleted by mods even if not top-level comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 04:40 PM
–

Indeed, and that is a good comparison. They are very arbitrary because no other person from another ideology would get the benefit of the doubt in this way Their knee-jerk defense of hypocrisy is honestly pretty mind-bending. I suppose its an extension of woman goodism and seeing their side like a sports team. You'd think for pragmatic reasons they'd try to cover up the hypocrisy. based on Q4RP I've seen here, the hypocrisy in this regard is like the single greatest driver of men to the red pill…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 11:12 PM
–

Practicing what you preach is very important in order to be taken seriously. Failure to do so It has always been recognized as indicating the ideology's prescriptions are likely unworkable or some ulterior motive is at play. However, it renders virtue-signaling as useless and actually indicative of hypocrisy/bas character, people react viscerally
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 10:57 PM
1

Bad faith comment. the plausibility of 'feminist women also like aggressive men' versus the plausibility of the earth is flat are not remotely in the same universe
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 02:37 AM
3

If you like mint ice cream and regularly purchase it while simultaneously claiming to believe mint farms are evil and oppressive and should be eradicated, then you are contradicting yourself. Movements' ideologies are determined by the views of their adherents. If a majority ("collective") also hold to that contradiction , then the ideology is contradictory. P1: Agressive Masculine behaviors that disrespect women should be eradicated P2: It is ok if Agressive masculine behaving men are shown rom…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 02:26 AM
1

I see by your flair you are not a feminist or Blue Pill so this may not be directed at you personally
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 02:12 AM
-1

OK but the issue here is that if you procreate with even just a normal solidly masculine man (which, t-levels are linked to aggression, surely you would agree)- it allows him to pass on his genes, and there is a markedly increased likelihood his offspring does impulsive macho stuff as a young man, including violence against wimmin.* Indeed, even praising masculine men or muscular men or something encourages other men to imitate them, which modifies their own behavior to be aggressive towards wim…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 02:08 AM
0

Yes, the 30% in your example who want x while claiming to want something contradictory to x would show those 30% to be dishonest or heavily self deluded. (In my example, these are Feminist women who prefer aggressive and violent alpha men IRL) The issue here is I see many comments from Blue pillers and feminists defending those 30% (becoming angry with RPers who criticize those 30%'s hypocrisy and choices). So in addition to whatever percent of feminists actually like the violent alpha guy, many…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 12:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter