TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Thaephon_FolLir Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by Thaephon_FolLir on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Religion and authoritarianism in general is a meaningless way to enforce morality. There are many romantic women who aren't interested in hoeing around. Atheism and liberalism mean that, in case you end up in a relationship with that kind of woman, you know that this is her sincere personality. Who would want a woman who's not a hoe due to oppression, but would definitely stack 100 bodies if there were no social consequenses?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 08:42 AM
1

Love the comments. I have no idea how women can feel proud for having sex with a man who would never commit. A man can literally be embarrassed to be seen in public with you and still open up and shower you with attention in order to get some easy sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 09:30 AM
1

Yes. I've seen girls writing in the description "I'm just here to play smash or pass with my friends" or "I don't know why I'm here. Men who have a tinder account are creeps".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 09:03 PM
2

Not necessarily. In the same timeframe, I got like three matches. I'm not better looking than him. Sometimes these things are random. That's why complaining and trying to find an answer is overthinking a game of chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 08:29 PM
5

Sure, but the very fact that people base their worth on dating apps is silly. I have a friend -good looking guy- who has a history of successfully dating only gorgeous women. He's single now. After he was rejected by two gorgeous women, his self esteem plummeted. My advice to him was to create a tinder profile and only swipe right on women he considers ugly. Two weeks later, he thanks me for my advice. "What happened?" I asked him. "I swiped right on about 50 ugly women and I got zero matches. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 08:15 PM
2

I'm not morally judging and I don't consider sex or number of sexual partners immoral in any way. I've had relationships and friendships with women who have had a big body count. Some of them are awesome people and I like spending time with them. I simply wouldn't consider a serious, romantic relationship with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 01:09 AM
2

I've said in another comment that I'd prefer a woman who has only two AMAZING exes than a woman who's had worse sex than me with 20 different men. As long as you think about it, it can't be insecurity, can it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 08:17 PM
2

It's not insecurity though. I met with my ex a few months after breaking up. She said "Since we broke up, I slept with 15 men and none of them was as good as you". She thought it was a compliment. I thanked her and appreciated it, but, truth or lie, I just felt the famous "ick". In my opinion, not even men really enjoy hooking up with random people that much. Most men I know only have the body count they have, because finding a sexual partner is more difficult for men. After months of rejections…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 07:41 PM
5

What about my other examples? Are they all hypocrites? Where does it end? A woman with a vagina isn't interested in women with vaginas and would only date men with penises. Hypocrite!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 07:30 PM
2

I've been accussed of "hypocrisy" so many times. Is a short woman who likes tall men a hypocrite or does she simply have a preference? Is a nerdy scientist who likes adventurous, free spirited women a hypocrite? Or does he simply have a preference? How about a twenty year old woman who feels immature but only dates older, clearly more mature men? These are preferences. A man with a high body count can find a woman with a low body count. They can both love and admire eachother and live their life…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 07:26 PM
4

Be careful there. Guys who think just like you go around saying "you go girl" to every slut they encounter. Then they get laid and practice. What's being said on reddit has to stay on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 04:49 PM
7

I'm with you. I would prefer to put it as a display of contemplation. As for the second paragraph, yes, I'd break up. Not because of the one night stand, but because I'd suddenly realize that I'm in a relationship with someone who's lying to me. "Maybe next year she'll confess to another one night stand. Maybe after our child is born she'll confess to a threesome. Then, after the second baby, to a few gangbangs, drug addiction, history of hurting animals" etc. I wouldn't be able to trust her. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 07:01 PM
4

They would still mostly interact with their friend group. On my first day as a student in a foreign country, I wrote in the university's main chat "I'm at [cafe] and just ordered a beer. If you want to hangout, you're welcome to join me". Within an hour, about 10 people, guys and girls, joined me. 50 years ago this kind of ease would be unthinkable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 06:21 PM
0

Well, then you'll be more fascinated to learn that people have made this into a whole science! I started with Lacan, but if you want to get the full psychology experience, you'll be shocked to know that people have been having these same conversations since antiquity!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 06:15 PM
27

I wouldn't necessarily attribute that to technology nor romanticize the past. The reasons for social alienation of any kind are the same as ever. Fear of the unknown and awkwardness. Try going alone at a bar searching for male friends. It's not much easier than finding your next date. People will stick to their group and probably ignore you. Now imagine that you're on a quest to reject most of the people who respond in order to find the best possible friend group you could have in your life. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 06:11 PM
6

My only way to avoid sarcasm would be by providing you with an objective research recreated in a lab? You can tell who the manslut is and so can most people. It's simple human intuition.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 06:03 PM
3

When people are comfortable enough to literally have sex, they're usually comfortable enough to talk about it. If you're only interested in the first hour of meeting them, I can only refer to my last paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 05:57 PM
6

Definitely not from her looks. Before answering, I'd like to say that I try to view this objectively and not consider being quick to have sex as anything negative or positive on its own. The best way is to simply communicate. People like to at least imply how they view sex and relationships, they like to know if they share the same values, they like to vent or brag about past experiences (good or bad), about their preferences, their fantasies etc. It's definitely easier to have these conversatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 05:48 PM
9

If you're a little bit older than a teen it's not hard to tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 05:17 PM
10

Yet being a "hoe" depends on whether she's going to have sex with [low value] guys like him [too quickly]. She's not less of a hoe if she later takes it slow with a guy she really likes; only lying to him (while not having lied to the previous one).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 05:11 PM
16

I don't disagree. However, if with the previous 20 people it only took an hour, we can't expect the poor guy/girl to feel great about being the one who needs a month or two of warming up before touching them feels... acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 04:56 PM
13

And that's the right way to do it. I'm not really saying that men are "expecting" to get sex, just because someone has had sex in the past. I'm mostly talking about men hating the idea of being the guy who only got sex after two months of talking and building a connection, while another was so charismatic that emotional expectations never applied to him in the first place. In my opinion, if a guy prefers women who take it slow, he should ony pursue them. I know some will try to "use" those that …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 04:49 PM
7

Not in my experience. There are assholes of all kinds who will guilt or pressure you, but generally men will only anxiously pursue quick sex as a means of "compensation" for when they've felt they're being played with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 04:14 PM
29

Men who like purity wouldn't mind waiting for sex. Most would probably PREFER waiting a little. The problem arises when she's pretending to be pure by making him wait, while in the past she's had ons with random dudes. Waiting isn't the problem. Being considered an idiot is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 04:06 PM
3

It's not complex. Would you like it if you and all your friend group have had sex with eachother's present wives? Or would you prefer it if each of them only had sex with their own wives, even if that meant less overall sexual experiences?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 11:51 AM
1

I've stopped judging men who like high body count women. Most of us want to have fun with these women, then eventually marry the good girl. The fact that promiscuous women feel safe that eventually someone will take them seriously, makes them give all of you sexual experiences before settling down.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 11:48 AM
0

Some women might feel it's hypocritical. I simply believe that men and women are different both biologically and socially. Since I can find a woman who is both not promiscuous and accepting (or even admiring me for my) body count, there's no reason for me to settle for someone who has tried half the town's men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 04:04 PM
-1

Nah. My body count is much higher than my relationship count. Hypocritical or not, my threshold for female promiscuity is equal to my relationship count, simply because women who don't need an emotional connection before having sex give me the ick.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 03:48 PM

Even though I was in a dark place, none of my actions were impulsive. I rationally and systematically chased after sex. As a young man, at the time I felt like having a high n-count would save me from the fate of a loser. I've outgrown it now. Because women aren't exactly applauded for having one night stands, their promiscuous habits would be either due to impulsiveness or fear of missing out. I personally wouldn't feel safe being in a relationship with a woman who's had a history of dealing wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 09:19 PM

I have a relatively high n-count, which I got mostly during a shitty 2 year period of loneliness, alcoholism, ugliness and mental illness. Now that I look and feel better about myself, I'm back to being a romantic and very selective. Even if you feel this is hypocritical, I wouldn't seriously date a woman with a similar n-count to mine, because I know that high n-counts are the product of low self-esteem and desperation for validation, which are extremely unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 07:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter