TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Thagros Archive

View 1 post and 51 comments by Thagros on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Thagros/r/seduction05/03/12 03:56 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Exactly. As much as I would love to agree with some of the sentiments contained within, it's still an unreferenced editorial in the Daily Mail from 2006. Nothing more to see here.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 09:22 AM
2

Unsubscribe from the women whose feeds this appeared in. Done.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 01:09 PM
21

This is the concept that women can usually only become attracted to a man if they think/see/know that he is selected by other women as a potential mate first. The more you look for this phenomenon in life the more you will see it. Compare to a man's attraction - you see a woman, you think she's hot, you want to fuck her. You don't care what your friends think. If they're all, "Bro, she's not even hot!" your response is, "Says you, fuckwad." and you pursue her. A woman can feel attraction for a m…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 07:39 AM
4

I like to combine Sign of Maturity with Radical Honesty. So when she says, "Well, they were getting along well with you . . . ?": "Of course they were, I'm a very interesting man. And you don't want a man who can't attract other women." [give wry smile, turn, walk over to couch and sit down, turn on TV. She comes over and sits on my lap to block TV to get attention. She initiates sex.] "Good girl."
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 12:02 PM
2

Cheers mate.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 11:10 AM
-1

And would you be so kind, mate, if he does so? Cheers.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 11:06 AM
155

Great fucking work, OP. I find it remarkable that despite everything this subreddit has to teach us, there are still morons commenting that you handled this wrong; that she "disrespected you", that she needs to be punished, or you should have gone with the Latina girl. I suspect that these are the Iron John anachronistic twats. The ones who mistake keeping a woman on a short, authoritarian leash, with masculine power. What could be more powerful than demonstrating to a woman that you have option…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 05:16 AM
6

Could you please summarise more Red Pill posts. I'm fucking serious. There's gold here but most of the time I have to sift through a lot to find it.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/13 10:25 AM
1

Oh she totally nailed it.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:56 PM
2

I'd love to respond with something cogent and incisive but instead I have to say AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! GIRLWRITESWHATYOU'REAMAZINGANDILOVEYOURCHANNELANDYOURVIDEODSANDTHEDISCUSSIONVIDEOSI'VESEENWITHYOUINTHEMYOU'REFREAKINAWESOME!!!!!! [ahem] that said, you've just given me an interesting new lens to view the gender behaviour dynamic through. Cheers!
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:27 PM
3

This is a very interesting discussion you two are having. To interject - you said you haven't seen any evidence that femininity is considered weak or how it is considered worse than the masculine. There are innumerable articles on the net like this one advising women to be more masculine in order to succeed in business. Now, I'm actually in agreement with what you've said above, so please don't respond to me critiquing this article as if I support it's message. Please don't respond debating the …
/r/MensRights04/11/13 09:53 AM
3

I have more sexual success in Japan than my own country as a white guy. My game yields more results here. "YEAH, but you still have to have GAME." Yes, and? I'm doing well. Better than I was before. Which is exactly what I wanted. Thanks very much. Ahhhhh the White God with Game lives!! Ah Ah Ahhhhhhh.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 01:51 PM
5

I dunno, man. You say one "was a compliment". Well it is, and it isn't. It occupies the same domain as another sexist concept - to "man up". It is perfectly acceptable to tell a man to "man up". The inference - based on his gender a male should be able to: - Suppress negative emotions and emotional outbursts. - Strive towards a goal without venting/complaining. - Apply more androgenic attributes such as physical strength, aggression, and competitiveness, in order to solve a problem. The "man up"…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:21 AM
1

You reminded me to watch this bit and forget about the twat who wrote the article.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:11 AM
32

Please tell me you flip them off full force beforehand. "This situation calls . . . . [raise middle finger in woman's face, maintain eye contact] . . . for a very special middle finger promise"
/r/seduction28/06/13 04:05 PM
30

If there's one group that needs to hear this more specifically than men in general it's /r/seduction or guys interested in pick-up in general. It's a group I enjoy participating in BUT: A terrifying proportion of them are evangelists to an erroneous and vague notion of 'Alpha'/'Real Man'/'Tribal Leader'/'Warrior'. The problem is that every single person brings their version of what this means to the table. They won't admit that they've inherited the components of their definition from various un…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:18 AM
16

I had a 'practice' experience recently and it was beneficial for these reasons: I've historically been that guy who falls into relationships. I'm working on one-night stand game. It felt fantastic to know I could make that happen. A real stepping stone. It was something I couldn't do 2 years ago. She had a great fucking time too. I was clear with her from the get-go what my intentions were and she was fine with that. IMO people ITT are incorrectly telling you not to have practice experiences but…
/r/seduction12/05/13 12:13 AM
0

Mehh, just stand up straight, move a little slower, use effective eye contact, smile charmingly, and don't hold your arms like this. Then you're fine.
/r/seduction11/05/13 11:25 PM
15

Exactly. This was an important milestone victory. There's an alternate universe where this guy didn't disarm the AMOG and instead sheepishly mumbled, "Yeah whatever" and the girl looked awkwardly at him for a sec and then took off.
/r/seduction25/03/13 05:45 PM
1

Check out the bottom of the page for butt-hurt evangelist-alpha-bros.
/r/seduction16/03/13 09:57 AM
1

There's a distinction that needs to be made here: The article was talking about the hypocrisy of saying you shouldn't need external validation and yet clearly basing one's own value on getting laid. And then calling yourself, 'alpha'. It did not say, though, that all guys who get laid a lot are like this, and have no value to a seduction community.
/r/seduction16/03/13 09:44 AM
3

YES!! That is really an "A-ha!". When you realise, "Wow, if I go out and approach 50 women and they all shut me down" (which is not likely but anyway) "I will be 50 experiences less-afraid of rejection"
/r/seduction27/02/13 08:43 AM
43

You don't have to be comedian funny. You just have to be 'makes girls laugh' funny. This one was big for me when I realised that my friends and I make a lot of intelligent/obscure/bizarre/nerdy (whatever you want to call it) jokes. Hilarious to us. Hilarious to our female friends. But it was not great for creating attraction. I was so sick of seeing (what I incorrectly perceived as) idiots making girls laugh with their humour I decided to throw some of what they did in to my game. Fucking hell -…
/r/seduction26/02/13 07:17 PM
2

The advice on RSD is fucking gold, mate, the stuff I've read/watched so far. :)
/r/seduction27/01/13 01:52 AM
29

I think any of the more thoughtful readers on this subreddit will have experienced this problem at some point. I think this is mainly due to: 1) Most PUA speakers assert their opinions and experiences as facts, with an inordinate amount of confidence. If you work in a scientific background you know the problems of just stating opinions that have not been empirically demonstrated as facts. These guys assert everything they say, with almost no room for, "Well it could be this way it could be that …
/r/seduction25/01/13 08:27 AM
7

You're right - but think of it like whiplash. 10-20 years ago you could say you had whiplash from a car accident and no one would question that. You just go to your doctor, say it hurts when he/she moves your neck and boom, you've got a diagnosis and any associated support you seek. Now however, because people started going, "hmmmm, there's alot of people saying they've got whiplash these days, more than before in fact" they did the detective work and realised many claims are fraudulent or vultu…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:37 AM
4

Ah, I'm glad you've brought this up because I'd be interested in some brainstorming on this. Since I started being conscious of the eye-contact issue in relation to attraction I've observed that it upsets the energy of normal conversation if you maintain eye contact too heavily. I know, stating the obvious. However, I've also noticed that with attractive women, attractive/'alpha' men, superiors at work or in other social scenarios if I go into an exchange thinking, "I'm going to maintain warm, f…
/r/seduction11/11/12 09:22 PM
9

Stick with it, dude. I completely endorse with what Greenlava said above. Furthermore it really fucking annoys me when people pull the, "You either got or you ain't"-shit. Y'know who pulls that out? People who are threatened by the idea that practically any skill can be started with no previous experience, learned and improved upon, and eventually mastered. They like to think, "No, there's something inherently awesome about me that means I'm good at . . ." whatever.
/r/seduction11/11/12 09:00 PM
1

Thank you for your contribution. Wish we had more like you. When you ask about men wanting to 'play a bunch of women' and that being messed up I think this shows a significant deficit in your understanding of a man's psyche (that's not a criticism; if this subreddit is indicative of anything it is that most men struggle to understand the female perspective). Just as the OP wants to understand a woman's psychology of attraction towards confident men, I entreat you to try to place yourself in the …
/r/seduction14/10/12 10:07 PM
2

Splendid report. Saved to remind me that there is no failing if you try.
/r/seduction14/10/12 09:38 PM
7

Are you Joe Rogan?
/r/seduction14/10/12 09:30 PM
5

I agree. This is such an important thing for me to do as well. When I'm meeting new women, particularly in a more 'sterile' environment (work/university) I try to sexualise the conversation at some point early on. For me it's about communicating, "Look, I am not some twerp who finds sex, conversations about sex, or anything about physical intimacy intimidating. These things are fun for me." I think this is important so you don't get lumped in the pile of real life Beavis' and Buttheads (as much …
/r/seduction14/10/12 09:26 PM
12

Actually most of the transformation stories you ever read describe today's PUA's as most definitely NOT 'alpha' types initially - who then go on to 'fake it til you make it'.
/r/seduction14/10/12 09:15 PM
9

Could not agree more, mate. Distilling everything down to "duhhhhhh, that's alpha/beta" only adds an evangelical element to discussions on attraction and self-improvement.
/r/seduction14/10/12 09:13 PM
0

if you think about it, our ancestors, at some level, are all alphas. Ok. Ok, I've thought about it. The thing is I've spent time on many obstetric wards around the world. When you do that you realise that every wingnut and dumbfuck on the planet can drop a litter of mewling cabbages. And that goes on for generations, centuries, millenia. This is not just true of humans, this applies to all other animal species. There is no reason to assume this differed in prehistoric times. Given that those fro…
/r/seduction27/08/12 11:45 AM
1

Dude, what are you doing?! You're gonna burst a lot of alpha-bubbles with that kind of talk.
/r/seduction27/08/12 11:32 AM
1

Tentpole.
/r/seduction30/07/12 06:46 PM
2

Hey man, finally got round to reading the link you posted. Thanks a million, seriously. Couldn't agree more.
/r/seduction30/07/12 06:44 PM
2

I wasn't making an argument for passivity. I was critiquing the apparent disregard for the complexity of challenges facing some people in this area. For me personally if I want to go to the gym, talk to a girl, be outgoing and social, take on a new challenge I'm at a place in my psychological development where that decision is easier. But the OP is not. And a lot of guys have a ways to go. So you're right - it is for us, it isn't for him. But he can get to where we are with commitment and dedica…
/r/seduction07/07/12 02:07 PM
2

Yes, YES!! Sean is a fucking legend and most of my negative beliefs do lie in shards on the floor because of him. OP - this is worth investing your time in. I also recommend the David DeAngelo lectures when Sean speaks if you need something audio.
/r/seduction07/07/12 11:32 AM
10

Exactly. Oh you're depressed? Cheer up for fucks sake! Oh you're an alcoholic? Just stop drinking! Oh you're anxious? Relaaaaaax, guy! Smoke some weed! It's not that fucking simple for some of us. If it was he wouldn't have posted.
/r/seduction07/07/12 11:27 AM
10

To the OP - listen to this fucking guy if you can. He's right on the money in several places. BUT you may be in a place where you can hear what he's saying but it doesn't feel like it could apply to you. Mate, I've been there. I would hear what chaps like Psyocal would be saying but I would make exceptions for how I could not be like this. I recommend doing mental exercises that allow you to get your foot in the door on yourself, like imagining what it would be like to feel this way, or making i…
/r/seduction07/07/12 11:19 AM
0

That's a good approach. Nice one. Upvoted.
/r/seduction05/07/12 11:32 AM
11

But . . . he's the only one, right? Nobody else would assertively state an opinion about seduction as if it was fact?
/r/seduction04/07/12 11:39 PM
3

Let me ask you an important question - why are you not answering his question? (I totally get the point you're trying to make but he won't, so don't get all Socratic, it's rather pretentious in these circumstances)
/r/seduction04/07/12 12:32 AM
1

Hey man, good for you. From what I understand from pick-up psychology, having your values in line (like refusing to jeopardise someone's relationship if you've decided that's not for you) is key to success. Sounds like you've got that area sewn up.
/r/seduction23/06/12 06:14 PM
7

Hahaha! I never noticed the guy's got his fucking arm locked around her face so she can't turn away. That. Is. Brilliant!
/r/seduction23/06/12 11:24 AM
5

Absolutely. Needfakeusername, seriously you get no respect from me if you fuck around when you know someone has a boyfriend. I know, I know, you don't give a fuck about respect from me. Just focus on this - Adez23 is right, nothing good would have come from it. Appreciate you sharing.
/r/seduction23/06/12 11:21 AM
-1

Mehhh.
/r/seduction02/05/12 11:01 PM
1

Ok, maybe not bullshit. Just saying in my years of studying seduction materials I've noticed the term "Alpha" is thrown around recklessly to suit the purpose of the person making a point. More specifically, I note it's frequently used to describe and by proxy justify being an overbearing twat; with an implicated, 'self-evident' logic connection that states "This overbearing behaviour is Alpha, females mate with Alpha males, therefore overbearing behaviour is attractive". As the article points ou…
/r/seduction05/03/12 03:57 PM
7

Yes, exactly, yes. I know plenty of self-loathing, negative people who can attract women consistently. And NO, not damaged women with personality disorders. I'm new to Seddit so i don't know if this is raised all the time - what is with PUA's (are they even called that anymore?) who have to assert everything they say? That is, they imply a ridiculous degree of self-evidence about the points they are making. They're as bad as zealous communists and libertarians stating, "If everyone just did it m…
/r/seduction22/02/12 01:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter