TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tharkun140 Archive

View 1 post and 67 comments by Tharkun140 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
100

misandryTharkun140/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 07:51 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

looks Proven to be the most deciding factor, which makes sense, since it's what we see of a person before anything else. Good looks are also helpful in amassing money and influence (especially if you're a tall man) and the halo effect makes attractive people appear more virtuous than they actually are. personality Matters, but not in the "being respectful makes women love you" way the guy from the video preaches. Having "good person" personality traits doesn't automatically make you more attract…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 11:13 AM
53

If you want to get comfortable with being "one of the good ones" and beating your breasts, then I think you came to a wrong subreddit. I'd just not date someone who hates my entire demographic in the first place, and neither most people reading this post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/26 11:04 AM
37

When ancient empires conquered a city, they would typically treat civilians differently based on their gender. Men were killed, while women (and sometimes male children) were sold into slavery. That should tell you everything about how much gender matters when you're not in the outgroup, as opposed to the favored class.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/26 05:01 PM
27

I've tried something like that in my writing, as a subplot in my interactive novel. It did not spark much debate, but nobody seemed to mind it either, so maybe you should give it a try.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/26 07:59 PM
24

Do you think not dating a single mother is punishing her, and that's why men are rarely interested in those? Because I assure you, most men don't see their dating habits as a punishment-reward system for women. Most of us just don't want to jump directly from being single to raising a kid, much less one we didn't sire, and many aren't huge fans of kids at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 01:04 PM
13

Talk about women as an issue to solve and see how positively women respond to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 09:25 AM
13

What surprised me really, is that this pattern happens under 90% of my posts. I post about men's issues and men are simply unable to talk about them. The most common response is "but women do it too" or "but women do worse". That sounds like you talk about men as an issue to solve, rather than men's issues. Care to link a post or two?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 09:05 AM
63

Study reports women emit 26% less pollution than men from transport and food - but there is a catch I don't think there needs to be a catch, this is such a small discrepancy explained in so many ways that I pity anyone who needs to use it for their gender war campaign.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 02:30 PM
106

It sabotages its own message by taking a xenophobic tyrant and deciding that his height is the thing that deserves constant mockery. Only our heroes (who aren't that ugly even in their ogre forms) deserve body positivity, otherwise comedy comes first. Besides that, it's a pretty cool movie. 8/10, I watched the sequel the other day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 09:36 PM
20

Even 62 million page views seems high. Is there any chance it's actually 62 million HTTP requests? Motherless is the seventh most popular porn site on the Internet, so 62 million monthly views is reasonable. Especially since half of that is probably bot traffic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 12:05 PM
9

Neat. I've never asked for these features, but I'm planning on becoming more active on this sub, so they might come in handy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/26 10:50 PM
38

Internet politics is mostly just roleplay. Nobody wants to move to a country that upholds their values, unless that country just so happens to be wealthy and welcoming to immigrants, which is why you don't see mass leftist migrations to Cuba. The point of whining online is to whine online, nothing less and nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 08:45 AM
12

I see arguing with them as a way to upheld my values and show that not everyone is comfortable with the language they use despite what they think. There's a 50% chance you were talking to a bot. Rounding down. I feel it’s letting injustice run rampant and doing nothing if I don’t speak up There are better places to speak up in than an echo chamber comment section.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 04:05 PM
70

You don't have to argue with misandrist. To the contrary, you really shouldn't. There's no point feeding the trolls.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 03:52 PM
57

Women in Poland account for 63% of graduates, 68% of postgraduates, and 53% of doctoral students. I've studied mathematics there and was surrounded mostly by female students all throughout my education. The idea that women deserve additional points in education programs is nothing short of laughable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 05:15 PM
1

A women only draft would be good for one thing only, and that's making pregnancies more common. Fighting age women have an "opt out of military service" button built into them. Unless you wanna go into forced abortions territory, but I'd like to think nobody is that callous and bitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 11:13 AM
15

As for the awful thing you said, not to sound dismissive or anything, can I look into it perhaps? I would love to learn about it. As another commenter remarked, I'm talking about the "Movember" charity. I only learned about them recently, so I cannot make definitive statements, but based on their money allocation and the people they associate with... it's not looking good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 12:52 PM
37

Culture is the ideas, customs and structures present in a society. There is no difference between "cultural" and "systemic" factors. Either you're failing to articulate yourself, or you're plain wrong. As for feminism, it does a whole lot worse than just "ignore" or "minimize" men's problems. Right now, I'm looking up a charity that claims to fund prostate cancer research and men's suicide prevention, but has female leadership and is alleged to divert its funds to women's organizations instead. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 11:19 AM
1

Men won't change who they are for women? Where do you find these men, and can I meet them? I want to learn self-worth from them, I feel constantly pressured to chase women's standards and I'm not even dating atm. But that's beside the point, your view of male standards is just wrong. Most billionaires end up marrying a woman over thirty, feminist views are expected, 'feisty' is commonly considered an attractive quality. Low body count is the only standard expressed by men semi-commonly, but it's…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 10:57 AM
8

How many downvotes did you get, exactly? Because if it's just one or two, then chances are someone was feeling grumpy and downvoted every comment in the thread for fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 10:29 PM
2

Especially since there seem to be a lot of anxiety from men surrounding the idea that women generally would have access to that kind of quantity, and there seems to be efforts to culturally police that access. I'm sure there's some envy involved. Personally though, I would love to see more "quality monogamy" in works made for men. I'm curious what a mate-bonded perfect girlfriend would even look like, and how many men would find that fantasy appealing. The mate-bond is symmetrical in a way that …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 11:36 AM
3

In what ways? I can't say I noticed any patterns of behavior in ROs guys fawn over. They can be anything from an abusive dom mommy to a literal slave, anyone who looks decent can join the hero's harem.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 11:09 AM
6

Are there any equivalent prominent male fantasies often expressed in culture (movies/books/videogames/porn) with the purpose of male self-gratification? Not equivalent, no, since male fantasies tend to be about quantity rather than quality. Female love interests are rarely anything special beyond their above-average looks, but there's often a lot of them and men find that hot. Think harem anime, or macho serials where the MC has a different lady in each port.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 09:52 AM
10

Honestly? It sounds like you ran across some maledom porn, got upset, then started making wild assumptions about porn in general, male preferences, gender politics, politics in general, castration... it's just one huge leap after another. You might as well find a femdom erotica and explain how it's intrinsically tied to the rise of feminism and the psychology of liberal men. People's preferences in smut are not that deep, and rarely reflective of anything beyond their preferences in smut.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:11 PM
18

Bait used to be believable. This is just a hook thrown into the ocean.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 10:13 AM
68

Disagree with someone on the Internet and you'll become an incel instantly. Easy, no effort required. For a serious answer, incel communities attract men who do not feel welcome anywhere else, be it online or IRL. Nobody looks at these forums and decides they're great unless they're treated with hostility everywhere else, or at the very least perceive other spaces as being hostile. So like, don't be awful to young men, and their chances of becoming incels will be lower than otherwise.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 11:27 PM
8

Men being more likely to be killed is true almost everywhere in the world. At that scale, it's pretty much pointless to mention gang chivalry codes, since their impact is small and local. Men just really don't like killing women. They usually don't like killing other men either, but anyone who ever watched a war film or played a video game is kinda desensitized to that. In contrast, there are very few contexts where killing a woman is seen as a positive act, even in cultures that otherwise don't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/26 05:50 PM
1

Honestly? Chances are nobody will read your book no matter what kind of story you write, since literature is a very oversaturated market. There are more writers than ever, but readers are in short supply, and most of these readers are women who only want romantasy novels. If you feel like writing a space opera for men, go ahead. I wrote one, and I don't regret having done so. Just keep your sale expectations low.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 08:30 PM
63

It bears noting that women not only have the right to abortion in most states, but to legal parental surrender itself. Popped out a baby you don't want? Just refuse to name a father, give up a child for adoption and you're home free. You don't even need to draw analogies between LPS and abortion, the former is already allowed for one gender only.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 11:25 AM
32

Somehow, the most offensive thing about this is not misandry, but complete lack of literary knowledge. Men had a full reign in literature since 2000 BC, women only had a few decades to write. History's first novel was written by a woman over a thousand years ago ffs. Go read "Tale of Genji" right now, it's more educational than whatever reddit keeps feeding you.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 12:38 PM
0

According to a guy I find pretty smart and who seems to have reliable sources, you have a roughly 3% chance of being falsely accused of rape in your lifetime. FIY.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 07:33 PM
70

I got my master's degree over a year ago and I've been unemployed since. It's driving me crazy in an almost literal way. Too much of our self-worth is tied to employment for this situation to not have drastic effects on men's mental health.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 07:11 PM
2

Hell if I know. I suspect they just listed whatever came to mind, regardless of the medium or release date, completely ignoring my actual question. Self-righteous rage isn't exactly a friend of reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 10:51 AM
10

When this topic came up on r/writing, I got downvoted and yelled at for asking if there are any newly-published books that pander to men. The one person who actually engaged with me mentioned Iron Man, Batman and Citizen Kane as books that cater to male fantasies. Citizen Kane. You know, everyone's favorite recently-published novel. That's how slanted traditional publishing is. Of course men don't read books published in a market like this. Few people have the time to dig through piles of romanc…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 09:18 AM
2

Most of the public MRAs are just arguing like a broken record, they can't move on from problems like "men's dating problems" or something like that which is obviously counterproductive. I think the entire gender facing major difficulties in such an essential area of life as all romantic and sexual relationships is a pretty big deal, but I guess we differ here. There are many many more genuine concerns that could be effectively argued with well substantiated points Such as?
/r/MensRights13/03/25 02:54 PM
29

Misleading title. Women will not be conscripted into the Polish military because there are no plans to conscript anyone yet. Here's what the Prime Minister said during the press conference: Jednym z najbardziej docenianych jest model szwajcarski, tzn. to nie jest obowiązkowe, ale są zachęty, które powodują, że mężczyźni decydują się na coroczne szkolenie i to niesymboliczne, nieudawane. Which would roughly translate to: One of the most favored models is the Swiss one, i.e. it's not compulsory, b…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 07:56 PM
12

From a game of telephone they've played for so long they basically re-wrote history. It's true that banks would sometimes make sure a woman wasn't going behind her husband's back when opening a bank account, but the idea that women were banned from having bank accounts is patently absurd. Women owned county-sized slave plantations before the Civil War, I don't think a savings account was somehow beyond their reach.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 04:28 PM
3

You know how some movies have a villain do something completely unrelated to their motivation (and sometimes contradictory to it) just so that the audience can root against them? Because I feel OOP may have pulled the same trick. Her boyfriend's request to stop with the femdom could elicit some sympathy, so let's make him into an evil sexist to set the narrative straight!
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/25 10:51 PM
7

Even if it's a joke there must've been serious reason why they're saying this. Lmao no. People on the Internet don't need serious reasons for saying stuff. Someone show me a news report of a woman who climbed inside a grizzly bear enclosure to escape all the dangerous men visiting the zoo. Then, and only then, I will know that at least one person meant it when she "picked the bear" in her reddit comment. Until that day, it's all just common idiocy.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/24 08:17 PM
24

I don't really see why a capitalist system would see women as "nothing but incubators" since it would be pretty absurd from an economic standpoint. All you need for quick population growth is for every woman to birth three children over the course of her life, so in the world you imagine, women spend 27 months pregnant and do absolutely nothing for the rest of their lives. Which is not the direction capitalism has been taking for the past few centuries and doesn't really benefit anyone, except m…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:27 PM
365

It took them until the final week to realize that men will be voting too, and they made a last-ditch effort to win male vote by... releasing a bunch of shitty ads about how manly it is to support women. That's not just shooting yourself in the foot, that's ignoring a tumor in your foot for years, then blowing off that foot with a shotgun once you realize something may be wrong. They fumbled so hard it's downright funny.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:57 AM
8

I was wondering when that would happen the other day. I'd be surprised it took so long given how commonly-available this technology is, but then again, false accusers rarely expend any effort on providing any kind of evidence.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/11/24 10:29 AM
169

No one wants to be objectified in the sense of being actually treated as an object, except perhaps in some specific BDSM context. However, the concept of "objectification" is commonly used to demonize male sexuality and make even simple compliments into expressions of evil misogyny. In that context, sure—men commonly want to be "objectified" in the same way women do. But that's just because the term is used inconsistently, inequally and frankly stupidly by many people out there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/24 02:30 PM
0

Up to >20% of married men cheat (meaning sex) on their wives, but I'm still not going to ask my husband for yearly STD tests You probably should. Yearly STD tests are recommended to monogamous couples. Get tested too once you're at it, it's simply good practice. and to let me check his location, phone and social media at all times. That's obviously not comparable to a paternity test, where the hell did that come from?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 07:34 PM
6

Reviewing court documents, we found nearly 100 cases where prosecutors charged a person (almost always a woman) for supporting, taking part in or failing to stop a crime by their alleged abuser. So in a country with 1.8 million prisoners, these researchers didn't even manage to find a hundred cases of a person getting charged with playing accomplice to their alleged abuser? And it's somehow worth noting that, in this absurdly tiny group, the accused is almost always a woman? How does that prove …
/r/MensRights21/09/24 09:08 AM
67

If a person truly wishes to kill themselves, their "ability to commit violence" doesn't really matter. Men and women generally have the same level access to firearms, and they're equally capable of pulling the trigger. But here's the thing; Most women recorded as having attempted suicide don't want to pull that trigger, because they don't actually wish to die. Many suicides are really just a way to get attention, or a "cry for help" if you prefer. Attention and help are two things women have a f…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 08:42 PM
16

Reality- Men who actually rape women and are found guilty in the court of law continue on with their life, men who are accused of rape face no severe consequences. (...) There are countless examples of this through men in the spotlight, such as Mike Tyson, who was found guilty and served time for brutally raping a teenage girl, but yet just received a Netflix special. I'm confused. You're trying to argue how men almost always get away with rape, but you bring up a case of a rich dude who failed …
/r/MensRights04/09/24 09:14 AM
23

Probably somewhere in Kenya, 30 000 BC. Misandry is, quite simply, a hatred of men. Combining the two simple concepts of "hatred" and "men" could not have possibly taken humanity much time. You could possibly trace the origin of specific applications of misandry, like certain stereotypes or inequalities, but determining where misandry itself first came to be is simply impossible.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/08/24 10:10 AM
27

You can't really disprove a negative like that. If someone argues that there's a movement aimed at discouraging women from exercising, they need to provide evidence for that (pretty wild) claim. Otherwise, there's literally nothing to talk about.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 05:51 PM
49

Men think it's alright to have sex with a woman if she verbally consented. This seems undeniably to me like rape-adjacent behavior. So regular sex is "rape-adjacent" now, ergo all men are basically rapists. Sure. Why not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 07:15 PM
11

From what I've seen, most people here are not pro-life. When someone objects to abortion, it's usually to demand some way for men to opt out of parenthood (financial abortion is an oft-used term) rather than ban actual abortion. There's more to the topic of reproductive rights than this, but child support and alimony are the main subjects.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 02:20 PM
50

Short Answer: No it's not, next question. Long Answer: The only way to call modern USA a "patriarchy" is if you expand the concept of patriarchy—a social group led by its oldest man, that is the patriarch—to cover any society where men hold power or privilege of any kind. But in that case, we would also live in a matriarchy, since women demonstrably hold power and privilege as well. We would also live in a kleptocracy, plutocracy, theocracy, gerontocracy and almost everything else all at once, b…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 10:16 PM
40

"Manosphere" is just a term for any group (or even anything vaguely resembling a group) remotely concerned about men's issues in any way. It includes communities that not only have nearly nothing to do with one another, but are sometimes completely opposed—MGTOW and incels couldn't be any less compatible in terms of beliefs and goals, but they're still considered "manosphere" simply because feminists dislike them both. Such a sphere cannot have "social power" because it doesn't have any unity or…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 03:50 PM
10

Hypocrisy shouldn't really be a concern when it comes to dating preferences. You don't owe anyone sex or dates, you can refuse those for any reason whatsoever and there's nothing hypocritical about that. The alternative is forcing yourself into a relationship you don't want, which is not very good for anyone involved, and it would be fun if more people were willing to understand that.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 09:55 PM
13

OP, can give us some examples of a feminist space (anything from a serious movement to a small online community) where the "radical feminists" are not the majority? Because otherwise, I think your use of "radical" is misguided, and you shouldn't blame anyone for resenting feminism.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:26 PM
3

I remember when, during one of the many TTRPG sessions I've played, my GM said that my female characters are more realistic than real-life women. I'm not sure what he meant, but I think it was a compliment. Other than that, I don't have strong feelings regarding this subject. Female characters work much like male characters, with only a few notable differences.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 07:39 PM
9

I figured an act of "preservation" towards a thread that insane couldn't hurt. And that neither could reinforcing the idea that misandry leads one to the exact same places other forms of hatred do, even if it's a no-brainer for some people here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 09:01 PM
14

I didn't click at these screenshots (I don't want to feel anger) And I commend you. I just want it known that misandry is not a left-wing value, and evidently leads in a very different direction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 08:22 PM
24

No, one of them specified they're not talking about killing all men, so it's fine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 08:13 PM
12

Probably never. Like, scorpions can't really do anything to deserve my distrust. They're very simple animals that are rarely dangerous to humans even when they do sting you, since their venom is meant to hurt things far smaller than you. And most of them are pretty chill with humans anyway, so they're unlikely to even try and hurt you in the first place. Unlike some creatures out there.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 09:26 AM
93

I mean... they are certainly better than r/MensLib, so they have that much going for them.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:34 AM
44

What hurts me most is the gender identification of these shelters and the fact we as a society say “men can be raped too”, “a women is capable of abusing a men” but then once it’s time to help mouths are closed. While it obviously doesn't solve the whole issue, I think we should avoid that very framing for decency's sake. It makes men getting raped or abused into some hypothetical that could happen sometime in the far future, and we should maybe be ready for such an eventuality. Which is obvious…
/r/MensRights01/07/24 04:57 PM
1

Okay, so I read the study in full and you have a point. They did not use voicechangers there, but they did pre-record voice lines so they didn't necessarily match the gender of the person playing on their test account. It's kinda difficult to tell, since it's not explicitely stated, but I think it was just two guys playing all matches using different voice lines. Still not a representative sample of actual playerbase or actual games (especially since there was apparently no actual talking involv…
/r/MensRights30/06/24 11:55 AM
16

Which team is more likely to be angry at a female player who's only there for her weird social study and probably doesn't know how to play; One composed of skilled players who can win despite that woman's lack of experience, or the one that lost because one of their teammates was paying more attention to how "submissive" the team was being than towards the actual game? Of course, I cannot confidently say that's what happened, but I have severe doubts as to whether the women doing this study were…
/r/MensRights30/06/24 11:11 AM
3

Think about it, we women have to look great, cook and clean, be all maked up and womanly, be gentle and thin at all times, never give an attitude, be good with children and vice-versa. Which is why all men will divorce their wives the moment they stop looking great or start gaining weight. I don't think there's a single marriage that didn't end before the woman hit her 50s, and most end the moment she shows any "attitude" at all. Those conditions are so harsh, man. /s Sarcasm aside, not a single…
/r/MensRights29/06/24 06:54 PM
4

There's no need for a summary, the law in question is literally just a single sentence. Art. 197, § 1. Kto doprowadza inną osobę do obcowania płciowego przemocą, groźbą bezprawną, podstępem lub w inny sposób mimo braku jej zgody, podlega karze pozbawienia wolności od lat 2 do 15. Which, to the best of my abilities as a translator, can be best rendered as Article 197, § 1. Whoever makes another person take part in a sexual intercourse through violence, unlawful threats, deceit or any other way de…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:27 PM
13

“This bill introduces a de facto presumption of guilt, a presumption of guilt that every person accused of rape will have to prove that he or she is not a criminal,” The politician who made this comment is a member of the Confederation, a party infamous for being very far right and... not very sane. Their founder and former leader has once claimed that all sex is partially rape, and men just need to not rape too much. Every other party in the Polish parliament, including most right-wingers, appr…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 05:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter