TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThatCoolBlackGuy Archive

View 0 posts and 99 comments by ThatCoolBlackGuy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The same with the 18 year old that sleeps with his 15 year old girlfriend. Again, even combined with the people who peed in public the amount of people on the list that falls in to these categories are extremely small. If you want something to be done about their unfortunate situation, fine. But i don't think <5% of unfortunate situations is enough to remove the sex offender registry altogether. We let murderers out without alerting the public and I would argue they are far more of a danger to t…
/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:59 PM
-3

Nice in theory. But prisons in the US (and much of the world) don't offer that service in reality.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 01:52 AM
1

The guy caught peeing in public should pay his debt and live his life. Do you know what percentage of sex offenders fall into that category?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 01:32 AM
-8

Both sex offenders and false accusers ought to be punished, but a lifetime registry is too far. No it's not. You have any arguments for this stance at all?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 01:27 AM
14

It's bad that he was statutory raped. But age and circumstance do not excuse you from parental responsibilities. ahahahahaah holy shit. People like this exsist. PEOPLE LIKE THIS ARE OUT THERE. What the fuck.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 12:31 PM
2

isn't fun to eat for the majority of your meals; chicken breast, eggs Take that back you savage.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:18 AM
1

Don't tar all the LGBT with the same brush mate. I suggest we do the same for blacks too? Maybe I'm asking for too much.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:32 AM
15

Oh so it's MY fault they stole my car? You really do hate victims like me don't you?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 03:01 AM
1

If you knew reddit you would know that /r/cringepics is where the scumbags gather. And i was banned from that sub 1 week after it started because my comments where not catering to the hiveminds. And if you look at my latest /r/cringe post its me actually defending the fans from Jessica Nigri(popular role-player) for sending her gifts. The marriage is ended. All responsibilities of that marriage should end with it. I agree. But "all" is very general. The way the kids should be handled should be s…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:07 PM
5

Very interesting. Why though? What are your arguments against alimony? And what would you say is a realistic solution? Demanding it to be eliminated completely is ridiculous and would never get accepted in a courtroom. Well unless of course you have any strong arguments against alimony.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:38 AM
2

This exactly. If anything this and many other laws regarding divorce should be revised. I don't think eliminating alimony will solve any problems.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:34 AM
3

It's amazing to me how if the roles where reversed (stay at home dad) nobody in this thread would be supporting you. Honestly you are only getting upvotes/support in this specific situation because it caters to our preconceived notions.... To clarify: Men who where married and where stay at home dads should receive 0 compensation when there is a divorce. Is what you are saying right?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 11:47 PM
1

I think men should have half split of custody of their children. Or if the children dont like want one parent/one is abusive(or if one parent voluntarily gives it up), then the other parent has full custody. I dont believe people without custody should be forced to pay child support. Yes let's award parents for being shitty people. If you have half custody, then you fund the children when they are staying with you. If you dont have custody, you should pay child support voluntarily. What about mo…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:54 AM
1

I think men should have half split of custody of their children. Or if the children dont like want one parent/one is abusive(or if one parent voluntarily gives it up), then the other parent has full custody. I dont believe people without custody should be forced to pay child support. Yes let's award parents for being shitty people. If you have half custody, then you fund the children when they are staying with you. If you dont have custody, you should pay child support voluntarily. What about mo…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:54 AM
1

So to you custody determines whether the kids are yours or not? OP makes 1.1K a month i can see why court would put the kids with a parent who is more financially stable.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:45 AM
2

I'm not going to argue this point. If you think that she isn't spending any money on the kids that's fine.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:57 AM
1

I get it now. But how do you calculate "half". If by receipts it would be you having to pay her half at the end of every month which doesn't sound sustainable.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:53 AM
2

I do not know if the amount is too much. We have yet to hear about how many kids this guy has. OP also has no proof probably outside of worth of mouth that the $400 the ex-wife gets goes to church. This sounds like community drama more than anything. More regulation and other rules must be set to protect men in these situations definitely. But that's not what most of these replies to me are bringing to the table. Its mostly "he owes that bitch nothing". Which i disagree with. OP is a "slave" to …
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:45 AM
1

I think you'd have to expand a bit more on that....
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:45 AM
1

But i think in most situations like that there are a lot of backstory that you guys don't always mention. I was also talking hypothetically. IF DANDAN's rule was set in place I'd hope it would be equal to both men and women.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:38 AM
0

But this isn't the case is it? OP made kids with this woman and was married to her. This wasn't a mistake right? OP made those kids with his wife(at the time) and should assume responsibility for the kids. His wife did not abort or abandon the kids they are alive and well. The point you bring to the table is like the most discussed one in this subreddit and it is a very complex one at that. But i don't think it applies in this case. Don't get me wrong the choice of keeping children at this point…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:36 AM
3

God. After reading this i think i will be avoiding marriage altogether these situations are horrendous.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:46 AM
1

Okay. I understand a bit more now i think. Its not about the money per se but the situation you are put in by having to give out the money. What you had to go trough was definitely bullshit. How long did you have to keep paying child support for the kid? And don't you think that looking at her situation the money you sent off probably helped the kid in the long run? Your situation to me seems way more unfair compared to other stories seeing that she left you while still being pregnant and acted …
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:14 AM
3

So if a man has custody of a kid and a new wife the mother of the kid should be exempt from her responsibilities as a parent. This rule you're making has to go both ways. Marriage does not take financial responsibilities as a parent off your back. It shouldn't you're a parent and you should provide for your offspring.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:05 AM
3

Oh i have heard of safe havens. There seems to be no way of ever combating that(except of removing the concept altogether). I really am not informed on the subject enough to argue there, you got me. I don't know what causes the gap between men and women in child support but i think it has a lot to do with the fact that 84% of child support providers are men. This probably leaves enough room for men with higher income rates to boost the medium.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:56 PM
0

Hey. We still have no clear cut evidence that she uses the child support money on the tithe even. I don't know their situation and it looks like she doesn't need it. But OP's husband has responsibilities.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:49 PM
5

Just because you decided to marry a woman with kids doesn't mean that the actual dad gets to stop supporting HIS offspring. They are still his kids and HIS responsibility too. Of course you can support your wife. What kind of spouse wouldn't? But that does not mean that the biological father gets to walk out and stop paying for his offspring. I hope you can understand me better now.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:48 PM
1

The kids can not be abandoned or left for adoption if the other parents still wants them and are in a solid state to take care of the kids right? I am not that big on US law... Also if the man gets custody the woman also pays child support right?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:45 PM
-3

But stories like yours are ones i have empathy for. $300 a month for 1 kid? I haven't experienced it but i feel your pain. But how much do you think would be enough for your situation? I stand by my earlier statement though. $400 is not that much for 2-3 kids. Especially when other men are paying $1000 for 2 and $300 for 1 like in your case. I do understand that is probably a struggle for OP because from what I've heard just rent could take up a lot of your monthly income so the situation is not…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:41 PM
-1

Did OP say that his husband does not get to see the kids? I didn't read that anywhere... And come on. If the kids are living with her she is definitely paying for them. I kind of hate it when people talk as if the parent with custody doesn't have any expenses for the kids when clearly it isn't like that....
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:33 PM
0

The kids are living with her. She is definitely paying for them. He needs to pay for them because its HIS FUCKING KIDS. Is this strange to you? Is this concept hard to understand? Because i don't see the issue you're having here... He had kids during wedlock they where not mistakes and he did (to some extent) plan to have them. You should provide for your offspring . Just because the new husband makes 4K doesn't mean that OP should be exempt from paying for HIS kids.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:30 PM
1

Maybe the first kid was an "oopsie, im pregnant!" , then the guy married her out of a mis-guided sense of chivalry. Maybe. He still has kids he has to provide for though.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:26 PM
5

I respected everything you said prior and to my other replies. But this YES! He has chosen to shack up with a woman and ALL of her possessions, some of those possessions happen to be kids, he knew this going in, she doesn't work so he knew well before hand that he would be the sole provider. So yes, he is now responsible for those children and that woman. This is not a hard bit of common sense to wrap your head around. If I pick up a used car, I am responsible for all the repairs, I cannot take …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:21 PM
-4

Yes. For the kids. He isn't paying her money for her but for the kids. How old is OP's husband? By now you have to know that having kids means more responsibilities. There are men(who even replied to me) who are paying $1000 a month in child support for 2 kids. $400 for 2-3 kids really isn't unfair.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:17 PM
1

Aw come on. To some extent. OP said "kids" where both(or more) kids accidents?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:16 PM
5

Something like this would be great. Following a logical train of thought and isn't biased against either of the sexes.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:15 PM
2

Your views are radical. All you have is personal opinions and a special perspective. You don't want to get money from a dad that is absent in your life? That's great FOR YOU. That is not a strong enough basis for people to have kids and not support them financially. OP was married and committed to this he probably planned to have kids. This means that after a divorce he can't choose to stop fucking feeding his offspring and tell them to fuck off because he is struggling financially. Your main ar…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:11 PM
1

Now that sounds extremely fucked up. I know some men are paying more though.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:03 PM
-1

Hmm i don't know what you mean exactly. But i do know for a fact that that change in default would cause such an outrage it would be crazy to even attempt though. There needs to be non-biased system in place to choose which parent is the better one for the kids.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:01 PM
11

How does OP know that the money is going to church? Like the 400 he is giving her specifically? Does she take the check and drive around for the town to see until she gets to church and deposits it? How much does she pay per month to the child? If there was any abuse or if the kids where not treated right OP would tell us. Going off of that i could say that i couldn't make an estimate really. But she pays for food and other commodities for the kids probably. 4k a month her current husband brings…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:00 PM
-7

Ha. Another dynamic completely overlooked by this sub! Very very good point.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:55 PM
36

OP's husband is definitely NOT the bad guy in this scenario in no way possible. But we do not know how many kids OP's husband has with his ex wife. Paying $400 for 3 kids to me seems very fair... Edit: Fuck it. After hearing these horror stories i don't think I'll ever fucking marry. No way.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:54 PM
4

OP said KIDS there is definitely lack of information here. It could be 3 kids for all we know...
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:52 PM
3

Sorry but your reply is based on personal experience and opinion. You are extremely biased and none of the arguments you presented where logical. My mother is/was a small town teacher for a public school. Needless to say, we didn't have much money. I still had a roof over my head, got plenty of food, clothing and a variety of entertainment was available to me as well. Could you say the same for every child living with only one parent and no support from the other? I don't need some other man to …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:51 PM
-1

These comments are a bit on the radical side i feel. I do not want to offend or make anyone in this sub mad. But No one is fucking him over. No one has enslaved him. He is responsible for the child he fathered. Period. Is a fairly good point. Being married means that you planed to have kids, after the divorce you should still have to support them in some way. And financial support is very important. The option you are presenting isn't all that helpful. From what i understand you want to make fat…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:43 PM
3

No offense and i agree 100%. But i just picture you as a pro basketball player dunking and winning a game against a little boy.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 03:17 AM
0

Who decides what is beneficial to the country? Majority , facts and taking current laws into account? If I think it's beneficial to the country to kill someone I don't like, can I? Depends on the state what the person has done and what your court decides. In this case majority has nothing to do with it. But evidence and laws do. But anyways, if your state has the death penalty in place. The person could die. YOU won't be doing the killing but... If it's beneficial to the country to silence prote…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 12:55 AM
2

If you have such an issue with the government spending your money on things you don't like why the hell would you stay in that country? It seems like you already have a problem paying taxes and this only adds to your current problem. I have literally never have someone i know avoid paying taxes completely. This must be a rare occurrence. If you hate America and what it already stands for why are you still in there? Is 0.00002% of the tax money you pay enough to avoid taxes completely?
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:18 PM
2

Oh well that's fucked up. I still don't understand why you would actively avoid paying any taxes. And if there's so much going on in America that you would rather not pay for it wouldn't be a bad move to change countries.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:00 PM
3

But when will force ever be used on you? Do you actively avoid paying taxes? I don't get it.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:52 PM
-1

Religious belief? Sorry but that's not a good enough basis to dismiss something that is beneficial to the country. You ,like everyone else who has replied to me used the same argument its funny to say the least.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:43 PM
4

If you're willing to send men with guns to collect money from people to pay for birth control, then i find that strange, but fine. That is the grossest oversimplification i have ever read. How much % of your money is going to go to birth control you think? I'm sure it'll be much much less than the percentage the government uses to buy things that blow people's heads apart.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:40 PM
3

Don't know bout you but my planned parenthood gives me limitless supplies of condoms. BUT i get what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:35 PM
2

"hey lets just be mean, egocentric and piss everyone off for no reason bwahaha !" Uhm...yes? The people against birth control and gay marriage are on the same ship when it comes to that. "I don't want my country to support no gay marriage what is this? A gay paradise? against "I don't want my money to go to no birth control" When asked why the only argument here is "Well its against my Christian beliefs and what i stand for." Take it as far as you will. But that is not an argument with any logic…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:35 PM
1

Women have kids expressly to get welfare benefits. I guess there are women like that. Wouldn't talk about it in general though..
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:32 PM
3

The reason your opinion is looked as a stupid one is because well..it is. Have you ever heard of abstinence-only sexual education? Have you ever looked at how effective it is? Based on statistics gathered its pretty much proven that sex WILL happen. Its not that the population has 0 self control. But you can't look at the stats for abstinence-only sex ed states and say that these teenagers have enough self control. Subsidizing birth control will in the end only HELP the country. There is literal…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:22 PM
2

You're right. Its tacked on and doesn't really hold itself up.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:01 PM
2

I get what you're trying to say. But sadly that's not the point. This is why i also added And living in a country that loves majorities if other people think that "Free birth control" is right and is more beneficial to the country. You can look up the fruits of abstinence-only education and how effective it is. After you're done look up how well handing out protection and teaching people how to protect themselves work. I think after reading 1 study on both of these you could find out for yoursel…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:01 PM
2

There are religious people out there against any form of contraception. Even moreso when it's their tax money that hands it out. I don't see how that's not an egocentric argument? when it's their tax money As a country as a whole its OUR tax money. And living in a country that loves majorities if other people think that "Free birth control" is right and is more beneficial to the country. What YOU, an individual thinks doesn't matter. Especially if your argument doesn't bring any positives to the…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:45 PM
0

You're right. Hence the " "'s
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:21 PM
-1

I think "the_girl" already argued against you constructively. America works (for the most part) with majorities and what is beneficial to the country. Your argument is that its not your job to subsidize recreational sex. That is not a good argument. Its egocentric just like every other argument ever mentioned in this debate. You, as an individual, don't get to decide what the country does with tax money. The amount of money you'll make in a lifetime will barely scratch the amount of tax dollars …
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:20 PM
4

My comment is a bit high up there isn't it? If there are people against it they are free to reply to me. My question only OPENS up room for discussion. If you have a good argument go ahead. No one is stopping you. u/Yetanother.... should have not gotten downvoted that's for sure. But i have yet to hear an actual argument. Edit: Year = hear
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:15 PM
4

Yup yup that's more of the vibe i was getting from it. But it still had to ask just to make sure.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:40 PM
9

I wonder why. Besides reasons that are entirely egocentric there are no other reasons why i could think you'd be against it. Especially when you look at where else your tax money goes.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:09 PM
94

Wait.... is anyone here against the notion of "free birth control"?
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:43 PM
1

Who's the beta here really? The dude who got cheated on..got exactly that. Cheated on. He can look back and say fuck this girl she doesn't care for me or my feelings and move on. The girl has everyone on her side , maybe she can even manage to keep the old boyfriend , she got what she wanted(sex) AND can possibly take this dude to court for rape. But OP...well OP lost some friends, his name is slandered probably as a guy who fucked a chick in a relationship while drunk , he might get taken to co…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 09:13 PM
3

Curacao as of now. Used to live in Netherlands(too young to remember if their where safe havens there). I actually get your point man. I might not agree completely. But i understand now what you mean that men don't have a lot of options of "outing". In my country you can take the other parent "he or a she" to court and make them pay the monthly fee. Too me ultimately if you chose to have any type of sex that may result in a child you should be forced to pay the caring parent for the child. Abort…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:26 PM
-3

Can't single fathers get money from the moms? If your woman left your baby at a police station or what have you can you not get it back?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:44 PM
-4

The partner also knew the chances, why does she get all the choices, and none of the responsibility? What safer routes is that? Celibacy? But don't dare tell a woman that, it would be wrong. Shaming! Victim Blaming! What? Are you saying that single mothers have no responsibility? This is pretty ignorant. Yes, how dare the man want the same choices the woman gets. Clearly, the same thing. I'm not asking for MORE options. I'm not asking for the power to unilaterally force her to carry a baby to te…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:31 PM
-9

Both would have a choice of what to do about it. If SHE chooses to keep it, and HE chooses to not, of course he shouldn't have the responsibility. I have to disagree completely. Pauze. This is one of the most extreme posts i've seen on MRA. By having unprotected sex you already knew that your partner might get pregnant. If she does and doesn't want an abortion you should pay for the kid. After all its YOUR kid too. If you don't want kids take safer routes. Mra's often knock on feminist because t…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:48 PM
-8

Woah this is actually a bit extreme..... so as long as the guy doesn't want the kid he made he shouldn't have to pay. Aren't we just shifting the situation from one side to the other? We're not making things equal here.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:42 PM
2

Holy shit. That is crazy.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:33 PM
1

Where on the planet is "you're worthless" an opinion? Its unacceptable either way.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:38 AM
-8

Edit : Yeah no after reading the comment section i realized i said something stupid.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:46 AM
2

Ehhhh. There are a lot of groups of people you could but in that sentence that would fit better. I am not going to make any generalizing statements.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:12 AM
1

In a way it is still helping men who are feeling urges and that are seeking help. But i feel as if that demographic is so small that this is just offensive to every other type of man. Like really do they NOT see their bias or what is wrong here?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:47 AM
1

send me a link please
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:48 PM
1

You are so on point on everything. Damn if only this could get posted on that site without backlash from the feminists.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 09:13 PM
3

On a side note, based on the logic of this piece, a man should be able to make "no conception of a baby" a condition of his consent, and if his lover gets pregnant, she'd be guilty of raping him. This a hundred times. Since we are redefining the word lets makes rules that benefit both genders. You know..... for the equality feminism is striving for.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 09:03 PM
8

Ooooh that's why. But what's AMR though?
/r/MensRights26/05/13 08:56 PM
23

Wtf.... happened to this thread? Holy shit mods.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 08:49 PM
24

...and fire alarms.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:19 AM
2

I'm implying that if a girl tells me before she comes to my house or whatever that she DOES NOT WANT TO FUCK. I WILL NOT TRY TO FUCK HER. It's a simple concept. I don't know why you're making it that hard for yourself.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 05:22 PM
2

I'm sorry but in that situation knowing she is underage and she already said no from the beginning i would have NOT pushed for it. I think this has more to do with respecting the woman. If she told me initially that she did not want to have sex i would have respected that you know? And lets not forget that people who are past 18 shouldn't be having sex with 16 year olds because its against the law. This guy let the dick think for him.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:35 PM
6

But she did tell the guy that she didn't want to before the whole thing. Guy probably thought he was slick and that the girl liked it afterwards... but i would respect a girl in that situation and not take it as far.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:34 PM
1

Oh god.... i've heard the term before didn't think of it of an actual "thing" , you know?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:37 AM
2

Word. And a lot of times after a radical argument like the one in the pictures done publicly a lot of more moderate and logical feminists will say that they're not all like that. But really looking through some youtube videos i find that there are a LOT of radical views in feminism. I don't discriminate against them. But just saying that the more outspoken ones seem to be more... aggressive .
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:35 AM
2

haha now im prepared at least. I will be looking more into the sub!
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:33 AM
15

I'm new here and don't consider myself an MRA but i do agree on certain things. My question is where do these women come up with this shit? Do we ACTUALLY have MRA's raping or killing women? Do we ACTUALLY have MRA's that condone these acts in their speeches? Things like these really make me worry about feminists. Edit:Thanks guys i honestly needed some answers on the subject. You guys are all cool people.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:36 AM
2

Only if she hates you and sends you to court right?
/r/MensRights17/12/12 04:02 PM
3

Wait....how old does a guy have to be to legally have sex with a teenage girl?
/r/MensRights17/12/12 04:00 PM
1

Doesn't look like it.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 02:06 PM
0

Don't you have to read someone's entire statement before you reply? Most probably won't. How do you know that? Some might. Some might. You didn't say that in your initial statement.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 04:58 PM
-6

No woman is ever going to sleep with you if you straight up say it , that's why you take time and date them and THEN fuck them. Men asking random women for sex will forever be considered creepy simply because it IS.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 01:38 AM
0

WHY ISN'T ANYONE MAKING A REPLY FOR EACH SEPARATE PARAGRAPH Sorry guys... i just want someone to have a full reply to everything she said.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:45 AM
1

/r/circlejerk is the place for you brother
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:33 AM
11

Found this little Gem. Almost everyone know its a joke.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:32 AM
1

Agreed , i think i just said something that was too simplified for an good answer. But your ideal sounds better.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:00 PM
15

I don't mind anonymity if they aren't PROVEN to be rapists. But if the case is closed and its proven that they where rapists then i think everyone should know.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter