TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThatDamnedImp Archive

View 2 posts and 617 comments by ThatDamnedImp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Mods are GodsThatDamnedImp/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:12 PM
0

GeneralThatDamnedImp/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:14 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Democrats and feminazis.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:32 PM
3

In France It was banned on the morality of companies having you and your children's DNA in a database iirc Again, this is the lie you feminazis tell so that you don't have to admit the truth. If this was the reason, they'd just ban the databasing, not the act itself. Feminazis love to lie about their reasons for doing things. Because they know that their actual reasons are indefensible. They are radicals. They don't believe that the rules of morality apply to them because they serve some greater…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:10 PM
22

Based on the posters desire to defend the indefensible so long as a feminist does it.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:08 PM
16

From what I read, it was banned because it was immoral to test the child while they were sleeping, which the websites suggest. That's the one of the lies you feminazis tell. Nobody really believe it. You don't even really believe it, you're just hoping we will.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:08 PM
8

Wow, that was just dripping with hyperbole. This coming from the movement that basically lives on the '1-in-3 women will be raped in college' myth...that has spread the 'rule of thumb' myth for decades...that openly lied about super-bowl Sunday being the biggest domestic violence day of the year...that lies about women only making 70% for equal work. Cry me a fucking river.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:07 PM
3

Feminism is about promoting equality between the sexes. No, it really isn't. That's the lie you people tell, but it's just a lie and you damned well know it. We've all had feminazi teachers. We all read feminazi news articles. We see feminazis on TV, and we see the results of feminazi script-writers inserting 'mansplaining' and 'manspreading' into everything they possible can. Feminism is not some unknown ideology, and we've all had interactions with you people. We know how full of shit you are.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:06 PM
9

Lmao at the feminazis in here pretending that these tests are banned for perfectly innocent reasons. They know damned well why they're banned, and that feminists were the ones pushing for the ban. But they will lie their faces blue insisting that it's really about concerns for DNA databases or the 'immorality' of testing sleeping babies. These may be the fig leafs the feminazis hide behind, but we all know the real reason they push for these bans: they hate men and want to make it easy for women…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:03 PM
2

Organization full of feminazis institutes feminazi 'guidelines' that will cause even fewer men to seek mental help than already do.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:39 PM
4

Feminists are the handmaidens of neoliberalism. They know that they have next to no public support for their ideology, and that the only way to force their policies on the public is through undemocratic, elitist means. So they cozy up to the globalists and the corporatists in order to enact their fascist agenda.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:38 PM
1

All public radio is feminazi radio
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:35 PM
7

Even if they change, who cares? That they did this at all proves that they don't care about the well being of men or boys. They only care about virtue signalling to feminists.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:17 PM
5

Don't see a psychologist. This sort of thing just proves psychology is a junk science anyway.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:16 PM
9

When all is said and done, this is going to end up setting gay men back decades. They are literally allowing their movement to be used to normalize pedos.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:05 PM
6

It is to the liberal predators of the APA. They want women to hate men so that women will have nobody but the government to protect them.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:00 PM
10

It's clear that this is a political and ideological move, and not one at all based on sound science. This is literally the APA taking a giant leap into virtue signaling, and it will make men a great deal less likely to seek the help of mental health professionals across the board.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:54 PM
7

The APA is a junk-science organization
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:53 PM
2

No conspiracy, Reddit's search engine is notoriously bad. I don't believe that there is no conspiracy. You can give them the benefit of the doubt, but I'm sure as shit not going to. We already know that the admins mess with search results to keep subs they don't like from reaching the top. And we know leftists at google alter their search results to hide facts they don't like. So I'm assuming malice on their part.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:44 PM
5

Google is a feminazi company well-known for altering search results to fit their political views. In the run-up to the 2018 election, they literally hid every negative story about Democrat candidates to help rig the election.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:43 PM
2

Only by retards. Seriously, most people don't bat an eye if you say 'retard' around them. Only the pearl-clutchers and media types looking to stir up trouble do it.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:41 PM
3

Because feminists hate men. They go to truly incredible (in every meaning of the word) lengths to try to avoid it, but they just flat-out hate men.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:40 PM
3

It's the only Canadian sub worth reading.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:39 PM
3

Psychology just isn't a legitimate science. It's just feminism masquerading as a science. How can any man listen to a psychologist, and still take them seriously?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:38 PM
1

Everyone knows the admins are feminazis, and everyone knows they jigger the algorithms to ensure that the results they want come out on top no matter what you search for. Feminism is fascism by another name.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:36 PM
5

aberration Seems pretty standard for the feminists I've met, the cackling witch who gets off on male suffering, then recites a pile of made-up statistics to justify it.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:25 PM
1

Remember: to be a feminist, you have to hate men. Male feminist, female feminist; the one great thing that unites them is that they had significant issues with men.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:24 PM
1

The press attacks Trump at behest of the bankers, because Trump is an anti-globalist who opposes their free trade, fed-worshiping, pro-immigration view of the world. That's why they go apeshit on him. There is no other reason. Obama had illegal ties to the Canadian government in during the 2008 election, they didn't go after him. Obama had 30+ immigrant children die under his watch in those facilities, Trump has had two, because starving, dehydrated kids don't always make it. But they spent 8 ye…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:23 PM
2

I can't imagine the Dems nominating a woman given that they lost in 2018 mostly because Hillary fell far short of their typical markers for men. Most Democratic men get 42-45% of the male vote. She got 36%.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:20 PM
3

The feminazis are mad that he helped dethrone their queen. No man with a brain will involve himself with the Democratic party until the feminazis stop using false rape accusations to get their way.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:19 PM
1

No, they raised him to be one of their own. He just rejected their specific type of cuntishness. But nobody who wasn't an overbearing, piece of shit moralist would feel comfortable writing the smugly self-righteous post he did. Just a different flavor of the same kind of cunt.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:18 PM
2

Clearly not, because you're still a cunt.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:17 PM
2

That his mother clearly didn't care about. A lot of single mothers are like this. She's probably just glad to have that evil male out of her life, judging by her response.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:17 PM
1

Typical feminazi.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:16 PM
1

Remember this the next time a feminazi trots out the 'only 2~10%' myth.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:16 PM
3

The modern feminazi will always choose an anonymous woman over their actual friends and family. They just can't be trusted. Ever. About anything.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:14 PM
2

And the mother is so man-hatey that she doesn't even want things pursued against the girl. Single mothers are just terrible people. Full Stop.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:14 PM
2

You feminazis have lied about literally everything my entire life -- the superbowl sunday myth, the rule of thumb myth, the college rape hysteria myth. All of it. Why would anyone believe you now?
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:13 PM
5

The media is just a feminazi circle-jerk. Never listen to anything the media has to say.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:11 PM
91

Preserving the ability of girls to do this kind of bullshit is half the reason feminazis exist.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:24 PM
5

What a shock. A feminazi acts like a feminazi. Reminder: she cut her teeth as a Democratic party activist and blogger.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:33 PM
17

This is why I ignore the news media. A bunch of shit-stirring liars, the whole goddamned bunch of them.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:29 PM
7

Bullshit. You retards weren't even alive back then. I hear you liars claiming that the 80s and 90s were some backward time, where this shit happened daily. And literally nobody alive back then doesn't know you're full of shit. You're a goddamned child pretending to know what the world was like before you were even born.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:33 AM
3

Anywhere else, I'd say a troll. But too many people here on reddit legitimately believe this insanity.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:32 AM
5

The 2-10% number comes from a single study. And it's the study with the smallest reported number. It also has a range of 2-10, which seems to be designed entirely so that feminazis like you can selectively choose to only mention the 2% number if you chooser to. You can't extrapolate jack shit. You clearly don't even kind of know what you're talking about. You're just another wanking redditor pretending to know what he's doing.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:31 AM
3

No politician is perfect. But he's better than the alternatives in the man-hating, feminazi Democratic party. It's the lesser of evils.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 08:34 PM
3

All of the /r/ask subs -- even /r/askmen -- are basically run by feminazis who will disappear stuff like this that isn't downvoted by the userbase. All of the big subs are run by feminazis. All of the meta subs. Pretty much all of reddit.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 04:12 PM
1

The liberal media is shilling very hard to make people think it was the whistle-blowers, and not the ideological nutbags at these journals, who are in the wrong.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 01:57 PM
5

It really is disgusting, the way feminazis are forcing people to get indoctrinated in their hateful ideology in order to simply get an education. These people are evil. Pure fucking evil. Because good people don't do shit like that. Decent people don't do anything like that. Only power-mad shitbags do anything remotely like that.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:54 AM
17

Article says she's already driven most of it into bankruptcy.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:51 AM
39

Yet feminazis will still come in here every day pretending it's not true.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:51 AM
3

OP is just a feminazi brigader. Block the piece of shit and move on.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:21 PM
3

Stuff like this is why I block every piece of shit feminazi shill that posts some obviously brigaded bullshit about showing feminazis 'empathy'. They have no empathy for us, they deserve none from us, and anyone who says otherwise should never be listened to about anything.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:21 PM
-4

LOL, no. blocked. Go shill for feminism elsewhere, feminazi.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:11 PM
-3

Oh look, the Share Blue shills are here to tell us that everything they don't want to believe is 'false flag'. Blocked.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:33 PM
5

It's the logic you liberals refuse to accept in medical insurance, where women cost twice as much, and you literally put it into law that men's rates had to be jacked up to cover their healthcare.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:32 PM
29

'Equity' is just bigotry with a different name. Never forget that.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:31 PM
71

ITT: Feminists who denied it in the first place, now pretending that they always claimed that this is what they wanted. Next, they'll demand increased funding for only the female troops. I guarantee it. Because women not getting more than their fair share is always sexism in the eyes of other women.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:31 PM
3

He's a feminist shill pretending to care about men. A lot of them on the mod list, tbh. AnnArchist is a mod here, and they're the one who let /r/Drama become SRDine town. Edit: there's a reason why posting about mod behavior is against the rules, and it's not because they do such a good job that they're above reproach.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 02:49 PM
1

More butthurt liberal posting. Blocked.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 02:48 PM
1

There is no actual proof that it's fake in any of these articles. It's just liberal assertions printed as fact.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 11:22 AM
-1

'debunked' by the lying liberal media. I'm blocking everyone commenting in here. This sub is nothing but feminazis these days, and those who shill for feminism.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 11:20 AM
16

He comes into male spaces whining that we have to make women a priority. I blocked him just for that. The MRM does NOT have to make women a priority. They have their own fucking movement, and if people like this always want to scream, 'Well, we still have to put women first!', I'm just not going to listen to him anymore. This is not the time or the place to derail about feminism like his type think it is. This is a men's space about men's issues.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 12:22 AM
1

Of course it does. It's almost impossible for anything to be majority-male without also being majority-conservative. Men vote conservative at 60+%.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 12:19 AM
3

This is the most retarded notion ever, that newspapers can't be held to account for the op-eds they publish. But if they publish man-hating propaganda like this, I'm never going to listen to anything else they have to say about anything. There's no law saying they have to publish bigotry. They do so because they agree with it. Just try getting an article like this about women, blacks or anyone else published, and then get back to me with your BS.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:40 AM
2

More man hating psychopathy from the liberal media.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:34 AM
0

So says the liberal media. I'm not sure I actually buy it. The media says Russia does everything in order to prevent liberals from getting criticized, and to allow liberals to dismiss all conservative concerns as 'trolling'. Russia didn't make up the term 'manspreading' though, and they didn't make western feminazis go on a jihad against men for the last decade (at least).
/r/MensRights09/10/18 01:27 PM
-13

ITT: trolls from all stomping their feet and screaming 'HOW DARE YOU!'.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 02:23 PM
-14

It sounds like you're just splitting hairs because you don't like what this says.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 02:22 PM
17

Who the fuck are you quoting?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 02:22 PM
2

It's about power. Feminazis want the power to get anyone who disagrees with them fired, no matter what their qualifications or how obviously bullshit their claims are. And they appear to have that power. So never let anyone guilt you for calling them feminazis. They act like nazis, treat them as such.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 12:03 PM
1

Never vote for a Democrat, or laws like this are what you get. Note: Democrats ruled congress at that time. They used to run congress almost all of the time, before IDpol destroyed their rural base and gutted their party nationally.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:48 AM
4

None of the numbers I've seen bandied about are actually rare. A 1-in-10 or 1-in-20 chance of something that horrible isn't rare. We don't say people 'rarely' die of heart disease or cancer, and they have similar rates of death. It's only rare when it's convenient for the media to portray it as rare.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:46 AM
3

That seems unlikely given this individuals hostility. What are the odds, really? That somehow they targeted this person for diamonds, or, like a lot of websites, that site doesn't actually use targeted ads?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:44 AM
3

Typicla of liberals, tbh. They pretend to care about other people to feel better about hoovering up all the resources.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:43 AM
3

Yeah, but the feminazi doesn't care about that. She only cares that MEN who do bad things get punished. Women who do bad things...she doesn't have time to care about that.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:42 AM
1

Another comment section filled with feminazis making excuses as to why we can't prosecute false accusers. A good place to find people to block.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:42 AM
1

So you admit, you feminazis think that that was national news. But somehow, five different girls colluding (which you feminazis claim never happens) to falsely accuse a boy of rape and neither the courts nor the schools doing a damned thing about it isn't? And I bet you wonder why your feminazi ass is getting downvotes.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:40 AM
1

Covered by tiny papers, but ignored by all the mainstream ones. That's the point. The media lies, and far more often, it simply refuses to cover things that reflect poorly on the narrative editors and paper-owners want to push. If anything makes feminism, free trade or globalism look bad, the mainstream media will outright refuse to cover it.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:38 AM
2

You want to ban everything and everyone who disagrees with you. In much of the world, you guys want to literally criminalize criticism of feminism. You want to create rules that only men have to follow while elevating women to a higher position above them in society by prioritizing only their problems and their issues. And you all very clearly believe in this dynamic where men are little children and women are very serious people who get shit done, even though all available data says they don't.…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:36 AM
1

Yes, the liberal media, which reddit refuses to acknowledge is a thing, but which survey after survey shows the population in general believes to be true. The newsmedia can't be trusted because they are partisan.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:33 AM
1

Because you are literally trying to derail the conversation to shift it back to your feminazi ideology.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:32 AM
2

I agree with you, but the feminazis are mad you didn't let them derail, so they downvoted you.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:31 AM
12

Reddit in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:28 AM
4

You sound very obnoxious, elitist and smug.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 06:06 PM
16

Prove this. You believe bullshit because you want to believe it. There are few hard numbers on how often false accusations are made. And they only cover accusations specifically proven true and made specifically disproven by the police, meaning that a lot of false accusations in high schools never get covered by these 'studies' at all. You just prove by spouting nonsense that you don't know what you're actually talking about. Link to this 5% number. And even if it was 5%, you're literally saying…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 04:26 PM
7

So, like most feminazis, you literally believe that it's the news media's job to propagandize the public by ignoring stories like this if it runs counter to the narrative. I'm sure you're also the kind of person who dismisses right-wingers who point out that the media is full of liberal narratives. While demanding that feminazi reporters adhere to the liberal narrative.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 04:23 PM
6

IT violates the liberal feminist beliefs of most editors and news reporters, so they're just refusing to cover it. Typical of the media. It's why I don't watch or read the news.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 04:21 PM
22

What a surprise. The political impetus is gone, and now the entire media will pretend this never happened, just like with Roy Moore.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 04:18 PM
3

This sounds like an excuse, and i don't buy it. You understand a propaganda message manufactured to be sold to sympathetic college feminists, not a reality.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:05 AM
2

It literally doesn't, and you're kind of retarded for saying that. Literally, literally. Not bullshit reddit literally.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:03 AM
2

That's not how I've seen it used. At all. This sounds like the excuse of a man forced to face the horrors he has supported, and blinking, saying 'no, no, this isn't me'. But of course it is.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:03 AM
12

So you want them to just get away with it? Note, there are women who have made dozens to hundreds of these accusations over the course of their lifetimes. Edit; Again, a mandatory arrest law would make this information available to the police, but not create a list of people who had performed the crime. It would only come up under background checks and in the course of any potential future investigation.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 06:13 PM
4

Honestly, if you just arrested these women, even if they were never brought to court, it would show up on their police background checks. And then the cops would know their history. That's all you need. Mandatory arrest rules if significant evidence of a false accusation is discovered. Just like feminists argued for in domestic violence laws. So what objection could any reasonable person among them make?
/r/MensRights06/10/18 06:13 PM
18

It would be truer to say that one gender is able to make accusations and have them taken seriously no matter how outlandish and convenient they are. They will not automatically be believed by everyone, though there is obviously a massive political movement and one entire political party trying to make it so they are. But they will be taken seriously no matter how unlikely their story is -- even under the law in some locals -- and that's bad enough to start screaming about it now.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 06:11 PM
5

But do Democrats have a right to find rules in our constitution that doesn't exist? None of you folks want to follow the actual system or the rules. You want to cheat. There is nothing in the constitution which follows the logic of Roe v. Wade. It's edicts are not applied in any other area with regards to medical care or privacy. The FDA could not exist, nor could the AMA hold any authority over government law, if it's logic were applies equally across the board. But rather than make a constitut…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 05:59 PM
2

They have yearly 'feminists are allowed to do whatever they want! OH ! And they get to protect articles!' drives. Probably during one of those. The left has become rabid in the last couple of years, and no longer makes any pretense at professionalism or even-handedness.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 05:55 PM
21

Oh look, another liberal who cares more about slamming conservatives than men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:15 PM
28

They don't want another source. They want to claim the story is a lie by pointing to a conservative one.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:15 PM
6

If someone on this site thinks they're swimming in misogyny while being constantly inundated with anti-male, pro-feminist propaganda, then I don't think it's possible for them to be well-intentioned. To put it bluntly, people like that just want to censor people who disagree with them, and the intentions behind that are never good.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 11:05 AM
2

NYS is literally a feminazi police state.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:51 AM
5

Oh, and because he drank a lot in college! Getting mad at a false rape accusations and drinking in college! So little there for the average man to relate to...
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:43 PM
5

Because of old-ass people who don't want to admit that their technology doesn't work.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:42 PM
7

Especially when someone brags about their ability to fake them.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:42 PM
3

Your average avowed feminists is fine letting specific men die, if it means righting a possible wrong against some unknown theoretical women. It's who they are. It's why I don't vote for women to be put in positions of leadership. Too many wannabe female leaders are feminists, and I won't take the risk.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:41 PM
1

When you cite him for stuff like that, you make it clear that you just hate men. Normal women don't resent men for their number of sexual partners or how many children they have. Women who hate men do that.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:17 PM
2

Never trust a liberal women, never trust a liberal company. Never trust a liberal.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:10 PM
13

When you want to ban people, but don't want to admit you ban people...
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:21 PM
2

Eat dick feminazi. Edit: Look at this guy's history. Every post here is concern trolling about how we're too mean.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:18 PM
-5

why should I listen to a metoo shill? Feminazi shills are a dime a dozen here. So go eat a bag full of dicks.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:17 PM
-2

Fuck you.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:17 PM
1

That sub is man-hating garbage.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:16 PM
2

Reddit is run by feminazis who think anyone that doesn't adhere to their hatemongering ideology should be forced to hear it anyway.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:14 PM
2

Because liberals are scumbags who hate men, and reddit is HQ'd in San-Francisco.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:13 PM
1

Reddit and the rest of the Democrat party are nothing but feminazis. Always remember that.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:13 PM
2

Everything on every social platform they manage. The left reacted to losing one election by deciding to throw all of democracy out the window.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:17 PM
1

Eat dick, feminazi ass-licker.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:15 PM
2

This website has never made money, and will never make money. So why do rich liberals keep pumping money into it?
/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:13 PM
1

So do a lot of feminazi subs they refuse to touch, so no, it doesn't. I am sick and tired of you people only caring about one side's wrongdoing. This is why I hate liberals. Every last goddamned one of you is a hypocrite out to control other people, and not make the world a better place, or you'd care more about this stuff when your own side does it, too.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:13 PM
1

Fuck you, Share Blue shill.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:10 PM
2

'OH NO! PEOPLE THERE ARE ALLOWED TO DISAGREE WITH ME!' Yet you expect right wingers to come here. Fuck you, blocked.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:09 PM
1

The people here and the ones who run it. So the entire place, yeah.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:08 PM
1

The admins are all feminazis. Look how they linked to a bunch of feminazi garbage when they quarantined /r/theredpill. That says all you need to know about who they are, what they are, and feminists really are -- nazis who ban others' speech while ramming their own down our throats.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:07 PM
97

Everyone knows the admins are san-fran feminazis.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:01 AM
3

Liberals: "let's use science to push our ideological beliefs! Just find some experts to shill for us!" Also Liberals,: "WTF, why don't people listen to the media or experts anymore?"
/r/MensRights27/09/18 12:50 PM
-1

Democrats decided it was inconvenient. And that's why you never vote for Democrats. They hate you. It doesn't matter how much you agree with them on this issue or that one, they hate you. Nothing they do will benefit you. You will be cut out of every nice thing they do -- or forced to pay for it while you get a shittier deal, like with Obamacare. They will never consider you deserving or decent or worthy or representation. Because they hate you.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 12:46 PM
5

You're all in bed together. I'm sick of the pathetic leftists on this sub pretending that the left isn't like 99.999% of men's problems.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:40 AM
2

Fuck you. you don't get to lob grenades, and then go back to business as usual.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:35 AM
-4

I don't believe that a single one of you slimy dirtbags believe his accuser. you're all just willing to lie and claim you do to put the hearing off. I will never even consider listening to one of you people again after this. Liberalism is the ideology of false rape accusations. The DNC is the party of false rape accusations. Edit: You still all want 'investigations' into an allegation you know to be bullshit. Why? To put off the vote until after the election, that's why. And every goddamned one …
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:34 AM
6

Eat dick, liberal fuckward.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:32 AM
6

Eat dick, shareblue brigader. Every time I see one of you shitbags on this sub, I remember just how worthless the democratic pieces of shit are. You fearmongering assholes go eat a thousand dicks. Fuck the worthless mods who let you brigade.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:32 AM
5

This sub is a haven for liberals who want to blame Russia for their man-hating problems. Fuck every last one of these DNC shareblue shills. The party of false rape accusations can suck my fucking cock.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:31 AM
2

Fuck you, share blue shill. Go choke on David Brock's dick.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:29 AM
4

Blocking the top, DNC shills complaining about russian shills. Fuck you pieces of shit who don't believe any real human beings disagree with you. Go brigade elsewhere, you shareblue sacks of shit.,
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:29 AM
1

If it's real? you've never seen a woman express this kind of crazy-ass opinion?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:06 PM
1

Yes, how dare people be allowed to disagree with you! You know that 2/3rds of men voted for Trump, right?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:00 PM
2

This like this has ensured that I never vote Democrat. I will never even consider any democrat, or a liberal from any other party, for any position in any office, ever. Shit, at this point, I just block anyone on this sub who defends Democrats. You can be fore men, or you can be for the party of false rape accusations. You can't be either.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:09 PM
9

The BBC has been a shitty clickbait generator for a decade now.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:07 PM
3

Then why are all of the feminists on the left, and the entire left overrun and infested with them? You can't have a discussion about anything with Democrats without hearings words like 'mansplaining' and terms like 'rape culture' and 'male privilege'. The left does everything it possibly can to demonize men, particularly white men, as part of a reverse southern strategy. But people like you don't want us to notice for some reason or another.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:06 PM
3

To the left, anything associated with men is evil.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:03 PM
3

There's a difference between 'the conspirators are all jews' and 'the jews have conspired against us'. Do you think Schlomo jacobs who works at the gas station is in on this shit?
/r/MensRights22/09/18 08:19 AM
2

That season was the just pathetic. They should take the show from Murphy and give it to someone who genuinely cares about the genre, and won't just use it to spout his idiotic beliefs about gender politics.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 08:17 AM
1

They see no difference between those two things.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:32 PM
1

Well, that's Slate for you. And Salon. And pretty much the entire media. The media is so politically biased that you are better off ignoring it completely, than trying to sort out what is and isn't true.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:31 PM
2

Liberals always do this when something they public pisses liberals off, but they never do it when something pisses conservatives off. It's very telling of the biases of the media. It's best to simply stop consuming media altogether. It only misinforms, and knowing that something is propaganda won't actually protect you from its effects.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:41 PM
2

Never trust the media. Never trust publishers. They are all just feminazis.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:35 PM
2

A feminist coming here to make this place look bad. Just like they used to go to voat to post child porn to 'prove' how bad it was there.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:32 PM
2

Lots of share blue like you in here.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:30 PM
0

Oh look, a concern troll relying on a feminazi brigade for upvotes. These threads are always good for blocking idiots, though. Edit: Ah, I see further down that you are actually a Share Blue troll trying desperately to push this absurd, politically motivated false accusation by a longtime political activist.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:27 PM
1

Lmao, everyone knows it's due to the different hormonal cycles, but nobody can say it anymore because feminazis control the media.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:26 PM
12

You people always make excuses as to why only people who vote for Democrats deserve free shit, let's be very honest about that. If you give one group something, compensate the other group as well. Not doing so will piss people off and cause resentment, both towards you as the person doling freebies out, and toward the group getting those freebies. I don't get why this is so fucking hard for people like you to understand. I don't give a shit what 'logical' argument you come up with for why it sho…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:24 PM
20

Imagine that. People resent if only other people get free shit. A failure to understand this is responsible for most of the left's failures. Give everyone shit, or give nobody shit, or you breed resentment. At this point I have to assume they do it intentionally.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:22 PM
3

This is the kind of retard who finds a way to autistically ejaculate 'THIS IS NOT A MEN'S RIGHTS ISSUE!' all over every thread.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:21 PM
5

I'm tired of seeing liberals whine about having to read things they don't like.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:20 PM
0

Eat, liberal piece of shit.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:19 PM
1

Blocked, like everyone else starting their comments with a justification as to why it's okay to do this because: Trump. Fuck off, you partisan shithead.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:19 PM
2

This is what feminazis do...downvote people for calling literal prostitutes, whores.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:18 PM
3

This is why I don't trust liberals about anything. It's clear that 90% of everything they claim to believe is a lie designed to make themselves look good and enhance their power over other people. Because they make no attempt at all to live by the draconian standards they subject every one else to.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:17 PM
-1

Blocked.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:16 PM
7

Democrats need to shut the fuck up if they want to actually win any elections.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:26 PM
5

Honestly, at this point I think we should just start fighting the inevitable civil war. If the Democrats have no respect for the processes of Democracy--if they consistently attempt to discredit every election they lose, if they consistently make false rape accusations in an attempt to win elections, if they consistently decide that reality just plain doesn't matter -- then they are not a viable partner in this system, and should be removed from it.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:23 PM
9

You're just a liar. We all know this about postponing the hearing until after the election. Every other excuse you guys make just prove the degree to which you're full of shit. Not a single goddamned one of you believes these fucking allegations you're shilling for. Not a goddamned mother fucking piece of shit one of you.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:20 PM
7

Oh look, a feminazi brigader to block.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:19 PM
1

Well, it's just an excuse by the feminazi Democratic party to push the nomination back in the hopes they retake the senate. It's a transparently disgusting political ploy, and it's why I will always maintain that the Democratic party is the single greatest obstacle to equality in this world. They hate men, are happy to destroy us to get what they want.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:18 PM
8

And this is why any man who even considers voting Democrat is a fool whose opinion I won't listen to on anything.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:17 PM
-6

Because they are feminazi brigaders, and the mods of this sub worrhlessly do nothing about it, because half of them are feminazi shills.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:03 PM
0

Again you fucking retards, that is the first ammendmnt, not free speech in generak.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:02 PM
-5

Piece of shit libertarian.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:02 PM
7

That's not true. This is what the first ammendment is about, but free speech as a concept is much broader.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:01 PM
-37

And this is why nobody takes this sub seriously. It's full of worthless libertarians. If yoy people think it's wrong to do anything, then why the fuck are yoy even here? You're just trolls looking tonderail.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:00 PM
8

This sub is full of pathetic libertarians who think activism against private companies is immoral.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:58 PM
2

Lmao, the mods really need to ban the constant feminist brigaders and trolls.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:08 PM
2

This is how left wing redditors view you. This place is not the internet.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:05 PM
1

The butthurt feminazis of all have given you a controversial dagger None can actually say you're wrong.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:40 PM
1

Fuck , you apologist piece of shit.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 12:57 PM
5

You obviously agree with her, troll.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:51 PM
5

Tit for tat, shitbag. You're just pissed that we're hoisting you on your own outraged petard.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:50 PM
9

Like someone wgo posts to poltical humor knows what a joke is.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:49 PM
16

What feminza sub are you freaks brigading from.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:47 PM
16

'My name is Enkidi, and I'm too stupid to tell the difference between private and tax funded events.'
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:47 PM
4

No, just a feminazi
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:43 PM
10

Oh look, somepunk who thinks only men deserve to get shit on. Eat a dozen shit-covered dicks.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:43 PM
3

Fuck off, feminazi shill
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:41 PM
13

Democrats hate white men, and will only ever work to make the lives of women and minorities better. I will never vote for a democrat.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 02:40 PM
3

No matter what the brigading apogists and lying feminazis say, the NYT is basically just a hate group at this point.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 04:58 PM
1

Liberals think that only other people should have to follow the rules, and that laws only exist to protect their chosen groups. The are just phonies and sophists.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 04:55 PM
1

England is simply a second-rate country.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:07 PM
5

I've given up on Blizzard in general, tbh.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:06 PM
1

Most women do not identify as feminist. 4/5s, in fact. Think about that. What other fringe ideological position, backed by less than 18% of the population, recieves this kind of universal praise in the media. The pro-life position has more than twice that support, and is treated by the mass media as something akin to child molestation. THAT is what people mean when they talk about the liberal m edia.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:01 PM
1

Is it, though?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:33 AM
1

Sure, but the way you all say it makes it sound like you don't want anyonw tried.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:33 AM
0

I remember when this piece of shit sold us out to the bankers after pretending he'd fight for homeowners. Fuck him. I hope he dies poor in some gutter somewhere. Banker piece of shit.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:31 AM
7

A klansman may take a black man's money. What does that prove?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 02:06 PM
4

You contradict yourself. Either they simply don't want customers feeling bad (in which case this would extend to men), or they only care about women (in which case, you would get the evident result). Everything you feminists say is an ever-shifting rationale for your bigotry.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 02:05 PM
13

Every single thing the feminazi says is designed to mask their man hate behind a thin veneer of intellectualism.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 02:02 PM
11

It is amazing how easy it is to get you feminazis to let your masks slip.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 02:01 PM
0

I'm just going to block you for feminazi apologetics.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 12:49 AM
1

Because the admins let leftists get away with it, and let's be honest here, in tbe wezt, left wingers are almost all femi ists.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 10:16 AM
8

So...men mst be married to prov their worthiness qs human beings. How are thse feminazis different from the Victorians again?
/r/MensRights04/05/18 10:11 AM
4

I guarantee that you people are saying this to blunt protest now, with every intention of making it coed as soon as people stop paying attention. And we all know how that will go. The boys will end up doing all of the work while women sit on their asses talking about how empowered and independent they are.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:58 AM
2

I won't let my kid join this crap org. The bsa are dead to me.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:55 AM
-3

I thought it was good. Now i think it ead to this. Honestly, this feminist and tranny shit has made me rethink my support for gay rights entirely.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:54 AM
2

Fuck off feminazi shill make your own org. Stop stealing boy's stuff. This is literally why men hate you.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:53 AM
5

Fuck off concern troll.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:52 AM
2

So were a lot of men.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:50 AM
1

They don't desrrve the traffic, shill.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:47 AM
1

They manage to make mras hate this sub due to laughably lax moderation.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:47 AM
1

Agreed. This sub is mostly worthless because the mods are all lolbertarians who take their own fucking side in an argument.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:46 AM
2

And that's why your sub sucks. Most of you are feminazis, and don't even attempt to keep people on track unless it's to chastise the actual mras here.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:45 AM
1

No it really doesn't, and the mods here are completely fucking useless.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:43 AM
0

Point to one against women, or written by a neonaxi. Or shut the fuck up and admit you're just a liar.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:42 AM
0

That they ran it at all is enough reason to dismiss everything they have to say. They don't run articles that disagree with their feminist agenda, and you dissembling assholes know it.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:41 AM
1

But the NYT doesn't do that, and you pieces of shit know it. Not one of you can point to a single op-ed remot e ly as critical of women.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:39 AM
1

Point to a single antifeminist article they've printed in the last year then.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:38 AM
0

They chose to publish it. You liars can make this excuse when they start publishing neonaxis or antifeminists. Til then, you're full of shit.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:36 AM
1

The nyt published it. That is an endorsement on their part. Looks like you are just a dishonest piece of shit.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:35 AM
1

They wouldn't. This is just some feminazi brigader from all comi g in here to doshonestly dissemble.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:34 AM
0

Nobody is going to give an article with that title a fair shake. Blame the editor for giving it a bigotted title. Like you femnazi brigaders have read even one criticism of femiism, bug you want us to read bigotted criticism of our our entire gender...disgusting fucking hypocrites, every goddamned one of you.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:33 AM
1

They never publish antifeminism pueces. Is there a reason why you feminazis are all telling the exact same lie?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:30 AM
0

Sexism is okay if it makes mo ey? Or is it only okay against men?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:28 AM
0

They don't run op-eds from neonazis or satanists, now do they? Lying feminists like you pretend that they have no responsibility for the things they publish because you're dishonest pieces of shit.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:26 AM
2

SJW brigaders don't care. And tbe moderation here is complete shit. Half the mods are feminazis who refuse to ban a feminist for anything.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:24 AM
1

No, they have repeatedly chosen to run feminazi bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:22 AM
4

This is bullshit and you know it. It's not like the NYT offers space to white supremacists or repdpillers. They are indeed responsible for the op-eds they run. And opeds li k e this mean that no decent human being should listen to a word they say.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:21 AM
-2

The NYT is just a feminazi mouthpiece at this point
/r/MensRights02/05/18 02:14 PM
-1

You get that people who disagree with you are allowed to use the words they want to use, and can't be restricted to the ones you like?
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:37 PM
2

One cuck, one total cunt
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:35 PM
1

You people have literally sued to ban male-only orgs. So screw off and learn what the word 'hypocrite' means.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 01:44 PM
1

You haven't been allowed to hit recruits for 30 years now. You're lying.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:36 PM
1

That is largely the answer. 60% of me. Will never vote for a Democrat. But reddit is full of liberal pussies, so they downvote you. Liberalism is very unpopular among men, and even more so among the men who would join the military.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:33 PM
43

Legal advice is lying. If they made money off of their IP, they can sue. /r/legaladvice has a long history of lying to protect women.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:42 PM
2

I just block the trolls and psychos.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:39 PM
3

More than not these days. Feminism has taught women that they have a right to whatever they want, and that exploiting men is empowerment.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:36 PM
1

Fuck off with your feminazi shilling. Blocked.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:57 PM
7

Every time a post hits all, the shills start shilling.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:21 PM
7

Every fuckinv time a story hits all, this shit starts. Good to collect screennames to block.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:19 PM
5

ITT: white knights and feminazis from /r/all
/r/MensRights19/04/18 11:20 PM
1

ITT: feminist apologists pretending that 'teach men not to rape' was satire, despite feminsts literally setting up classes to do that.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 02:45 PM
1

To defend its government, never its people's freedoms.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 10:46 AM
15

That only men get criticized for it, which is misandry.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 10:41 AM
3

Fuck off with you lying feminazi bullshit.
/r/PussyPass12/04/18 04:11 PM
1

Their fear is their problem. Not a goddamned one of them would modulate their behavior to be less distracting to us -- just look at how they shriek over dresscodes. So why the fuck should we concern ourselves with their paranoia?
/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:56 PM
3

'Whataboutism' is just a made up leftist term designed to make the liberal's hypocrisy off limits.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:54 PM
10

Fuck off, you feminist shill. Edit: you assholes always give advice to men and MRAs that you never give to women or feminiss. That's how I know you're shills.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:47 PM
1

Liberals are terrible at handling wrondoing by women. They are too used to pandering to them.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 03:31 PM
-2

There is nothing remotely fascist there. You're too retarded to know what fascism is.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 03:30 PM
3

Feminazi, typically. Somone in a marriage they don't actually believe in.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 03:24 PM
-1

This sub will ignore the problem and instead just beat the anti-Trump drm. Because to the sort who posts here, hating Trump comes before all else.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 03:55 PM
0

Fuck off feminazi. Blocked for shilling.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 12:42 AM
-4

Fuck off feminazi. You just hate men and get off on the idea of criminalizing only our behavior.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 12:41 AM
9

Letting hookers blackmail men for more money hardly seems healthy. You feminists will defend anything.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 12:40 AM
2

Disti ctions without a difference. The fact is, people like you see men as more evil than wome , so why should we listen to you?
/r/MensRights24/03/18 01:32 PM
-47

This is just bullying, trying to force people to go along with IWD. No thanks. This is a shit sub, and it won't become less shitty by trying to force feminism down everyone's throats. Like the other guy said, this is nothing but a response to the fact that google was criticized here yesterday.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:28 PM
-5

Actual moderation. Not 'We are too committed to free speech to actually defend ourselves' moderation.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:14 PM
2

Thje feminists from /r/all will just lie and claim that this is magically Unisex too. They won't provide any proof, and the mods won't ban them for making shit up or not providing any evidence. So what's the point in having a discussion here?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:13 PM
1

This isn't an attack on men lol This sub is shit, precisely because the mods refuse to ban anyone for saying any of this.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:08 PM
9

Said a brigading, lying cunt. Prove what you people are saying.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:07 PM
1

/u/hoodieninja86, not a single one of you has provided an ounce of proof. you all just keep claiming something that can't be seen from a picture, and demanding that everyone else treat it as true without any of you proving that it actually is.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:07 PM
1

They're both unisex, Again, all of you keep saying this, none of you are actually proving it.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:06 PM
-8

Prove it. Because it's starting to seem like you're all just screaming this over and over and over again, without any of you posting a picture to prove what you're saying--but with all of you upvoting each-other and downvoting everyone else.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:06 PM
1

You all keep saying this. none of you has any proof. You just keep saying it. Tell me, /u/Fail_Panda, do you actually know this, or are you all just saying it?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:05 PM
0

I don't believe you. I think you're just lying, because feminists have a long history of lying about things like this. Remember when reddit feminists repeatedly insisted that 'Teach Men Not to Rape!' was pure satire, that nobody actually wanted to hold a class like that in college...until classes like that started to be held. Then, about five years ago, they dropped the 'it's just satire, guys!' excuse all together. I feel that this is likely to be the same thing. None of you have any proof. you…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:04 PM
3

Because /u/junkeee999 is lying, it's just that feminists keep upvoting them because they want the rest of reddit to believe this. Feminists here have a long history of outright lying in order to dismiss men's issues, or prop up their own. They literally don't care if what /u/junkeee999 said is true or not, they just want to 'put it out there'-- a 'reddit truth', born out of ideological convenience, and not an interest in the legitimate truth.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:02 PM
2

Oh look, here we have feminists upvoting someone for saying something they would definite brigade against if it was said about them.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:00 PM
4

Oh look another 'reddit truth', upvoted by feminists who don't give one shit whether it's true or not, but who are very interested in convincing the rest of reddit that it's true. Because feminists really, really, really don't want people to know what policy actually is.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:58 AM
4

I might be okay with it, if I thought a woman who was accused of something 'bad' would be punished by society. But they wouldn't be, so it's not okay to do it to men. The NFL can go fuck itself, and honestly, so can you. I'm sick of you libertarian freakshows who think money is a valid reason to ignore constitutional rights.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 12:20 PM
5

Lawyers do not write the laws. This is just a blatant lie. Over 90% of all congressional and parliamentary houses in all of Oceania are lawyers. So lawyers do in fact write the laws. After getting something that basic wrong, why would I listen to you?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:19 AM
-1

That's English/Canadian/Australian bullshit for you. Mystical 'hidden' courts that you can't appeal against, secret 'governessess' who can deny the formation of a government, no constitutional protections and a complete lack of checks against government power. THIS is why Americans want nothing to do with Europe. We found wars to break away from those shitholes. Honestly, the only good way around shit like this, is to murder your kings and queens, and kill all of your nobility.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:17 AM
1

No, it's just the researchers engaging in feminist wankery in spite of their own conclusions.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:14 AM
5

It should never happen in the first place. It is amazing how much you all expect men to do before you'll acknowledge that something is wrong, and how little you expect women to do before you'll acknowledge discrimination. You expect men to ignore any and all discrimination that they can find a way around. You never expect women to find their way around anything--you recognize it for what it is and demand solutions. But with men, you demand we find our own solutions. That is sexism in and of itse…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:12 AM
1

ITt: Feminists from all suddenly finding skepticism they would never show anything from their own movement. Funny how THIS is impossible, but they swallow that '1-in-3' shit hook, line and sinker.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:09 AM
1

Socialists are even more pro-feminist than the IDPOL types, though. I will never trust anything remotely feminist after living through this time period and watching how Obama and the other corporate shills used it to divide us when we needed to be stronger. Anyone remotely associated with feminism is persona non grata as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:56 PM
1

Are they, though? Because it seems like you people always assert these things without proving it. Can you prove that organizations that help EVERYONE under-serve the black community? If you cannot, there is no justification for black-only charities. And either way, it is very telling that leftists--who blame whites and men for everything--repeatedly only want to donate to charities that exclude whites and men.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:54 PM
0

You're not wrong. There isn't much 'socialist' about America. But socialists are still strongly pro-feminist and very much anti-men. You can point out how little socialism there is here. But in the places where there is more of it, you have more anti-male behavior. So I don't get why you'd bother.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:53 PM
2

Alright. But you still help their movements, which hate us. The CIA is responsible for feminism (there is no first wave feminism, that's revisionist history, wherein feminists baptized long-dead women's activists from the late 1800-1930 into the movement, even though most of them were church-going conservatives). The CIA put up most of the early 'luminaries' and are the only reason feminism became so firmly ensconced in the same universities they used to conduct MKUltra experiments.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:52 PM
5

The green party everywhere is anti-male. It's inherent to their platforms. Do you think people here bash the left so often because we're just conservatives? I can't think of a single left-wing or even liberal party in the world that isn't anti-male or pro-feminist.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:48 PM
2

They are bitter, angry people lashing out at the world. I don't think there's much more to be red into it than that.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:43 PM
6

I know, right? Remember the 'Let's throw period-blood tampons at our enemies!' argument, where the idiot girl pretended that if boys slathered their dicks on their enemies windows, they wouldn't get punished at all! That was the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard in one of these movies. Even most feminists know damn well that would get boys kicked out of school and sent to prison.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:41 PM
6

Stabbing someone is WAY WAY WAY worse that groping someone passed out. You do know what Brock Turner was actually arrested for, right? It wasn't rape. 'Sexual assault' does not mean 'rape'. Edit: honestly, /u/Lumpinfujiko, get back here and defend the idea that 'groping' and 'attempted murder' are crimes of equal magnitude.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:36 PM
1

Brock Turner never stabbed anyone, never even actually raped anyone. He was accused of groping a woman in an ally while she was semi-conscious. I don't know how you can possible claim that groping and stabbing are on equal terms.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:35 PM
1

It's a terrible article, and I'm goibng to block you, because suggesting that women get treated better by the criminal justice system than men are, is not acceptable to me, and is so terrible an opinion to express that I just don't care what you have to say about anything. If it wasn't an article just about women, that would be different. But I'm not going to hear anyone out who suggests that only women deserve mercy.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:33 PM
1

Prove it. You aren't stating these things like opinions--issues on which other people are allowed to disagree with you. You're acting like a total cunt, screaming that nobody here is allowed to disagree with you, accusing others of 'spouting off' and 'not doing their homework'. That's you pushing your opinion as some 100% word of god, fact of life type shit. So prove it's a fact, or be less cunty when presenting your opinions.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:31 PM
1

note that class privilege is far more applicable to this specific case rather than gender privilege. Prove this before spouting off, dipshit.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:30 PM
1

All we know is that a woman committed domestic violence and didn't get punished. I don't honestly see why we need to know more. You're basically ANGRY--outright pissed off--that we're upset over one injustice over another. In my views, you're only angry because you hate MRAs, and are using this extremely flimsy shield (That we're potentially angry over one injustice, when it might--only might, and even then, only partially, not definitely and fully--be due to another injustice). but if you were …
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:29 PM
1

So a woman getting away with domestic violence is not a men's rights issue in your mind? I don't see how that's defensible. Feminist brigaders are the only reason you're being upvoted.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:27 PM
1

I think it's a little of column A, a little of Column B. I doubt that the media would be treating her with kid gloves if she was a rich man, and I think the government would have pushed to appeal the verdict if it had been a man.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:26 PM
3

This kind of thing is why The Punisher and other pop-culture figures luike him have enjoyed such longstanding popularity. Crimes rates may go down, but it seems like actual justice never goes up.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:25 PM
3

radical and opposed to hateful. I have never noticed a practical difference between those two words. In the dictionary, sure, in people, though? Never once.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:23 PM
44

but “I was not paid to deal with ongoing bulls**t and demands from small minded boys who cannot handle being shown their world view is limited”. She literally says this right after saying that she didn't treat the boys any differently.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:22 PM
5

If you're passionately arguing with children, you lack the majority to teach them anything. You can disagree with them. But a heated argument is more than disagreement.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 10:57 AM
1

Not aware of any links between puberty blockers and suicide. You're being deliberately obtuse. You know damned well that's not what he's saying.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 02:14 PM
2

Amazing how you lefties went from loving this term, to hating it, simply because Trump endorsed it. Like the way you claimed one moment that Comey had rigged the election, and the next that he was a man of universal respect and honor. Or how drone killings were bad when Bush did it, but no big deal under Obama.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 02:09 PM
2

I don't believe you. If this was going to apply to women, too, it wouldn't be called 'manspreading'. A Democratic city attacking men, because that's what Democrats do.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:16 PM
92

Again, the only way to make these statements is if you're okay with women sexually assaulting men. And if that's the case, you should fuck off right back to whatever /r/ShitRedditSays shithole you crawled out of.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:27 PM
121

So you're okay with women being allowed to commit sexual assault?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:26 PM
11

No, it's not. The US constitution specifically forbids this. Amazing how liberals love to go 'Let's just ignore the constitution because it doesn't let me treat men and white people worse than women and minorities!' and nobody here says a fucking peep.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:26 PM
17

It is not remotely fair. He's spewing the same 'Racism = Prejudice + Power' bullshit you always see his type spew. They hate men and they hate white people, so they invent this 'equity' bullshit in order to justify having different rules for different people. It's not just immoral, it's flat-out unamerican.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:25 PM
14

And this 'equity' bullshit is just an excuse by white-knighting sacks of shit like you to let women get away with everything.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:23 PM
12

It's about being fair, not equal. The constitutional specifically forbids what you're talking about here. It's called the 'Equal Protection Clause' of the US Constitution.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:22 PM
29

You're just making excuses for the inexcusable, bub.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:21 PM
13

Eh, I've seen too many liberals use this 'equity' bullshit as an excuse to take shit from men and give it to women, to treat men a thousand times more harshly than women in the same circumstance and claim that it was still 'equal' because it was 'equity feminism'. So no. I flat-out reject 'equity'. It's a word liberals use to treat unequal treatment as 'equal'. One rule for all. It may not be fair, but it's closer to fair than anything else is. You know, like you're doing here. Fuck your 'equity…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:21 PM
1

ADD, learning disability, stunted development and so on. Most of them are boys. Most of them don't have real problems. They have teachers that keep refering them to doctors until said doctors 'find' something wrong with them. ADD is because boys tend to have more energy, as testosterone acts on the nerves. 'learning disability' and 'stunted development' are due to teachers trying to handle boys like girls, and finding that the approaches don't work as effectively. So they appear 'stunted', becau…
/r/MensRights26/08/17 05:08 PM
1

'How dare you call my political advocacy, political advocacy!' But you know the partisans here will downvote it, because it's 'anti-feminist'.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 05:00 PM
1

Because in real life, the actual groups involved (young boys and girls) mostly don't want to be co-ed. It's the parents who are pushing this bullshit to seem 'progressive'. It's just not remotely the same. Put a bunch of members of the other sex down next to those of your own, and the dynamic shifts completely. Boys don't want to modulate their behavior and activities to accommodate girls. Girls don't want to accommodate boys.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:42 PM
2

Numbers weren't a problem before they stopped being fun. No more real camping, no more survival skills, no more of anything, because it's all too dangerous. Then, to top it off, depending on where you live, you may have to endure a bunch of feminist indoctrination, left-wing indoctrination, etc. It was an organization based around traditionalism and outdoorsmanship. It doesn't contain very much of either anymore.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:39 PM
1

Honestly, what boy wants to join a cookie-baking and feminism-spewing (really, research it; that org went off the deep end about ten years ago) club like GSoA?
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:36 PM
1

They have low membership because they keep virtue signalling, because the left keeps suing them and attacking them. Scouts were fun when I was in school. But that was a long time ago, and the more I read about the org now, the less interested I'd be pushing other kids into it now. On top of the stupid political bullshit, the rules and regulations now in place just make the organization so much...less than it used to be.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:35 PM
2

He said this shit publicly. He shouldn't talk shit like this if he doesn't want to be held accountable for it. Freedom of speech isn't freedom from consequences, after all.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:31 PM
21

California is a one-party Democratic state. Democrats have made it their bread-and-butter to 'help' women at the expense of men. So California is a fucking nightmare to live in if you're a man. NY, too, tbh. Every blue state becomes a nanny state, becomes a feminist state, becomes an anti-male state.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:28 PM
1

If you start adding the death penalty to non-murder crimes, you incentivize the perpetrators of those crimes to kill any and all witnesses. Feel with your heart, but think with your head.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:24 PM
3

Threats of castration are very common when it comes to female abusers, and women are far more likely to abuse their children than men are. An abusive mother threatening to cut her child's dick off isn't /r/thathappened material. It's practically a cliche, it happens so often.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:23 PM
2

There is literally nothing this idiot won't turn into an advert for the Democratic party.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 01:19 PM
18

What is the reason custody was given to the mother? She was a woman. You know this, though the disgusting nature of your first statement leads me to believe that you'll deny it.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 01:17 PM
2

Someone with only the words 'Mr.' in front of his name isn't qualified to be making up syndromes. This piece of shit isn't even a fucking doctor.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 12:59 PM
2

More anti-male sexism from a city run by Democrats. Big surprise there.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:23 PM
1

I hate whatever hates me. Because I follow my biologically invested instincts, rather than something that sounds good, but falls apart on examination. If you hit me, I will hit you. If you piss in my face, I will piss in yours. If you do either twice, then I'm tossing out proportionality altogether and will just go apeshit on you. Tooth and fucking Claw.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:15 PM
1

I may not become a white nationalist, but they've made me so fervently anti-ID politics that I will not vote for anyone who so much as condemns racism. It's just a dog-whistle at this point for 'lets shit all over white people, because they aren't allowed to talk back'.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:13 PM
4

they fucking idiots on the alt right dragged us into the gutter, again. Yeah, it's all the 'rights' fault, and the not the left that constantly slanders you. the partisanship here is truly fucking disgusting. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:06 PM
3

Note: the same people who will defend 'mansplaining' until they are blue in the face, are the ones who loudly proclaim that if you write anything that offends even a single woman, you should be fired from your job. Hypocrites. They don't even deserve to be heard out at this point.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:41 PM
3

This is the problem with this sub. In a sub with real moderation, a troll like this would have been removed. Instead, the mods only warn MRAs not to be rude or strident. But they let feminist asshats like this do whatever the fuck they want under the guise of 'fairness'.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:53 PM
4

It's an attempt to legislate male sexuality, which, if successful, will almost certainly lead to further attempts to legislate male sexuality. Either you're a troll, a feminist, or a retard (not that these are remotely exclusive traits). It seems impossible not to see how this intersects with men's rights. They aren't trying to ban female sex toys, only men's. Most likely in an attempt to keep harnessing male sexuality frustration for their labor-purposes, as the elite have tended to do since th…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:52 PM
1

Oh, I see, you're just a cunt. So you support criminalizing sex boys, are you a troll, or are you just a cunt pretending to care about men's rights, but how obviously doesn't?
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:50 PM
2

I'm pretty sure that an attempt to legislate male sexuality is a men's rights issue. I don't see how you can honestly say this.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:49 PM
1

All leftists hate the latter three. Feminists hate the first one. Feminism dominates the left (no matter how often partisans here try to deny it). People (particularly stupid ones) tend to view everything they dislike as being a piece of the same whole, and partisans are especially stupid people.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:43 PM
39

You see this repeatedly with educators. They complain that parents treat them like the enemy, but ignore the fact that 'zero tolerance' means that admitting to any wrongdoing brings massive punishment, so of course parents will protect their kid's futures and back them up no matter what. That SHOULDN'T be good parenting, but school/government policies have made it the least-worst form of parenting when compared with 'side with the school district and let them ruin my kid's life forever'. Teacher…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:39 PM
-1

Then why do you keep downviting everyone who disagrees with you, if you're such an amazing, forward-thinking individual, rather than the obvious asshole you are? You piece of shit liberals...you lying fucking hypocrites.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 11:21 PM
-7

Im left wing, and I'm an MRA. Stop pushing stupid politcal dichotomy on the actual issues. Funny how I don't see you anywhere on this sub criticizing the left for pushing stupid generalities and half-truths. You only care when someone criticizes the left. Which is too typical of the people here, tbh. Edit: Yeah, just downvoting me is going to make me believe you. Fucking lying, piece of shit liberals.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:04 PM
-1

That's a fair point, and also why MRAS will probably continue to be conflated with other political movements that aren't entirely aligned with the left Because you're dishonest shills who don't care if what you're saying is truth or lie, so long as you find it politically expedient. You get that that's why most of the right hates you, right?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:03 PM
2

There is a crossover of "lingo" between you guys in here and people from the donald or the red pill You get that this is witch-hunting level shit. there is massive overlap between SJW-lingo and the typical reddit lingo. And most of America dislikes feminism. You people make up a tiny portion of the population. You honestly don't think it's a little too convenient for you leftists to lump EVER SINGLE group of people you don't like together?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:02 PM
3

Basically any deviation from the left's views is labelled as nazi white supremacy. No choice but to double-down on trump until this nonsense is crushed out of the Democratic party.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:05 AM
1

The Democratic party and the liberal, feminist blogosphere. Those people are the ones conflating the two. Because they hate both and feel no need to be even remotely honest. Liars for Jesus, basically. They think they are serving a higher purpose.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:01 AM
3

Reddit is nothing but a hive of far-left, European feminists who go on a five-minutes hate every three minutes or so.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:00 AM
1

Maybe if you're talking about actually disabled people, or if the woman is on steroids or T boosters. But two healthy adults, the male will ALWAYS be stronger than the woman, no matter who they are. People like you severely underestimate the importance of testosterone when it comes to upper body strength. It shouldn't be controversial to state that the weakest men are stronger than the strongest woman. Only because redditors are trained to hear sexism whenever someone states the biological diffe…
/r/MensRights12/08/17 04:36 PM
1

Fuck the NY Times This. Just this. The grey old whore isn't worth the price of the ink used to print it. It's just a mouthpiece for a hateful elite that wants to grind us all into dust, and hide behind feminism while doing it.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 04:03 PM
4

You don't have the right to compromise other people's privacy for your own personal convenience. you know thinking otherwise means you're a cunt, right?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 04:01 PM
7

It's truly bizarre that a low-level trial judge would declare the statute unconstitutional to begin with. That's usually an issue for appeal, or a higher court to take up, not for someone at so low a level. It reeks of political activism. It's outright unheard of.
/r/PussyPass11/08/17 03:54 PM
3

This is way, way, way beyond the scope of a trial judge to decide. I can't think of another instance where a judge this low on the totem pole declared a law unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:52 PM
3

Gods, is it so difficult to admit that men and women are different? Not superior or inferior. Just fucking different. Thing is, these people admit this all the time. But they only admit it when the 'difference' allows them to paint men as inferior. You see it all the time from that set--the future is female, the 'end of men', toxic masculinity, fragile masculinity, mansplaining, etc. They are fine admitting that men and women are different, but only if that difference always paints men as the in…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/17 01:57 PM
1

Oh look, another post that the shitty feminists who infest shit site decided to downvote rather than discuss.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:35 PM
13

I did not "cite" the SPLC, nor state it was an objective source. From your initial post: The group is considered a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center So you're a liar. And it's funny how different the vote totals are surrounding your top-line comment, vs the rest of this thread AND your comments sub-top.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:01 AM
0

Snopes link LOL, shill. I'm not taking anyone who links to a politically biased shithole like Snopes seriously.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:00 AM
2

Hijacking the top comment to voice my unpopular opinion. This is unpopular for a reason. You're garbage. Human fucking garbage. Do us all a favor, stick your head in a bag meant specifically for the aforementioned substance of your being, and just wait for nature to take its course. We don't need some psychotic, autistic fuck like you mucking out our civilization.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 05:01 PM
9

Most people don't like feminists. I get that you live on reddit, where feminist brigades (mostly from europeans, judging by the time of their activities) flood everywhere where anyone discusses feminism, shutting all criticism down. But in the real world, feminism is massively unpopular, and particularly unpopular among millennials. Reddit is not representative of the real world. At all. Here, like 40+% of people call themselves funny. In the real world, that number is 18%,
/r/MensRights07/08/17 04:57 PM
8

Pandering men who say shit like this are even worse than the feminists.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 12:31 AM
3

No forgiveness needed. These moral purists--teenagers who haven't learned to grow the fuck up--are the primary reason progress is impossible here.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 02:12 PM
1

Then get rid of your idiotic rules?
/r/MensRights02/08/17 02:11 PM
1

Too many rabid, insane ultra-libertarians who think that public has no interest in free speech.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 02:10 PM
5

Edit: Wow this butthurt a lot of people... People pointing out that it fell apart almost immediately are not 'butthirt'. You're butthurt for them pointing out the flaw in your argument, and projecting it onto them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 04:01 PM
6

Is there any actual difference between the two these days?
/r/MensRights30/07/17 01:32 PM
7

No it's not. Listen to the way feminists talk about us. Listen to the way they frame everything 'male' as evil, and everything evil as male. That's hatred. Also, most of those words are just subdivisions of hate.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 01:30 PM
48

IF all it takes to stop a rape is a firm 'No', then nobody was raped in the first place.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 01:03 PM
1

but I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt They lost that right 8 or 9 lies ago. Everything they've been saying my whole life is a lie--from the Superbowl myth, to '1-in-3'. They don't deserve the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:46 AM
28

The feminazis in the cali legislature wrote the law specifically so that men's rooms would have to become unisex, but women's wouldn't, because they count a urinal+stall as unisex, but not two stalls. Never let the feminist apologists get away with pretending that it's a coincidence, or that the legislature didn't know what it was doing. A room full of lawyers didn't make a mistake like this one.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:44 AM
9

It's a little misleading to pretend that the feminazis in the CA legislature didn't write this entirely so that men's bathrooms would be affected, but women's wouldn't. That's literally the only reason the law would be written that way--to negatively affect men at the cost of women, something the Democratic party has become well known for since the Obama era (at least).
/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:42 AM
24

No, it's an 'anonymous' piece. I guarantee you that it was written by a woman.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 04:40 PM
2

It actually only takes math. Psychology is worthless in a pursuit like this, which requires hard data and little interpretation. We have algorithms that do this already.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 04:37 PM
1

Feminism's 'rule' was always on shaky ground. The actual movement is tiny. It has no support outside of academia, and it relies almost entirely on outsized representation in the media to make it seem as if feminism is the dominant social ideology, when it just plain isn't.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:59 PM
3

That sub is widely held to be worthless. It's mostly just used as a 'point at it and laugh' sub by the meta subs, much like /r/relationships. It's purpose is obviously not to give legal advice. It gets laughed at because of it's over-the-top censorship and strong left-wing and feminist political bias. you either know these things and are lying to us, or you should go and do some fucking research about it.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:54 PM
6

LA loves to discuss politics when it comes to shitting on MRAs, though. The Mod mentioned us in her post, so I just don't fucking believe it. This is political in nature, and you're pissing in my face by claiming otherwise. They wouldn't have targeted us if it wasn't political.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:53 PM
5

I'll never vote for a black President again, mostly because the DNC told all interested parties that they weren't allowed to primary a black President.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:51 AM
1

He's spitting disproven nonsense. A straw-man could contribute the same things to this conversation. He dismisses entirely the education gap between men and women. He is a blank-slate feminist pretending to care about men's rights. But whenever the time comes to actually do anything, he will be nowhere to be found.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:20 PM
0

When they disagree with us using feminist terminology, yes, we do.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:10 PM
1

It looks like it's there to me. And you people attack everyone to your right, everyone with even the slightest positive inclination toward traditional gender roles. So stop playing the woundied birdie.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:10 PM
1

You are too hostile to masculinity for me to trust. It's fine of you don't want to be masculine, but it's not okay to hint that there's something wrong with the rest of us.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:09 PM
0

So yes, you're a feminist pretending not to be.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:09 PM
1

You seem to be a feminist pretending to care about men's rights, but are a little too 'concerned' with whether this reinforces traditional gender roles. A concern troll.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:08 PM
2

Correct: he would be wrong, if this was 1964. But all the leftists are post-modernists now.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:04 PM
1

I agree. This sub is largely a joke. You aren't really allowed to post here if you're a Republican (60% of men are). You get insulted for not being pro-feminist (only 6% of millennial men are). It's turning into SRD in here.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:03 PM
6

I won't even hear someone out on a completely unrelated issue if they use the terms 'manspreading', 'toxic masculinity', 'mansplaining' or anything like it. I won't listen to any goddamned thing that person has to say.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 04:48 PM
4

you get that 63% of men vote Republican, right? A men's movement has to contain conservatives and conservative positions simply because most men are conservative.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 06:23 PM
2

True, but that still means that the feminists and leftists are to blame for their part in it. The pushback isn't that billionaires are innocent, it's that you're giving leftists a pass for their part in it.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 06:21 PM
1

No, but they can do political advocacy. And I guarantee you that they are the reason the left just says, 'Hurr-durr... this stupid hick thinks that chemicals in the water make fish gay! and refuses to do anything about it. Because feminists have turned this into a partisan, gender issue, instead of the obvious health crisis it should be. No doubt the billionaires are standing behind them, but it's obvious that the feminists are the beard they're using to beat back these regulations.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 06:20 PM
1

there's this creepy aspect where the same people who think that it's perfectly fine to generalize about the male gender, suddenly get their backs up if women are treated in the exact same way. Analyze men's behavior, and they call it feminism. Analyze women's behavior, and they call it misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 06:13 PM
1

No women are fucking with us breh. You're an idiot. All available data on human cognitive function indicates that no one even knows for themselves why they do the things they do. It's all done on instinct, and then the subconscious asserts whatever motive it feels will conscious mind will accept. This has been proven in studies on brain bifurcation, and on measurements of the brain taken during the decision-making process. They aren't fucking with us. They're fucking with themselves. This is som…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 06:05 PM
1

I've never known a well-adjusted dude who believed that he'd ever be treated like the captain of the football team or whatever if he "provided resources. Every man deserves to be treated as such by his wife, just as every wife deserves to get ahead of all others by her husband. That's what couple-dom is. If you can't deliver that, you don't belong in an adult relationship. People here give too much shits about 'feelings', and not enough about responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 06:01 PM
2

No, the elites' decision to abandon the rest of us, and instead see themselves as 'global citizens' is the heart of this. At no point of similar economic difficulty have drugs been more heavily regulated than now. This is the deepest, longest economic trouble since the depression, and drugs weren't regulated much at all back then. You're just a parroting bullshit you don't actually know anything about.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 02:03 PM
3

They know they're wrong. They just don't give a shit. Amazing how the government decided that everyone suddenly just became lazy, drug addicted or out-mechanized at the exact same time as the economic crash.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 02:01 PM
1

In fact, I'm suspicious of people who would get so worked up over it. So basically, you're the feminists in this cartoon, darkly insinuating things about anyone who disagrees with you?
/r/MensRights22/07/17 01:55 PM
3

Good for him. I'm tired of the fucking circle-jerk, where everyone has to be a goddamned agreement, or the disagreer is shown the door. People have a right to disagree with you, me or anyone else, for whatever reason they see fit. It is a natural right, the right to speak your mind freely, that can only be infringed upon by other people. Those people need to be ground into hamburger.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:58 PM
1

Feminist redditors from all in particular seem to automatically decide a problem 'solved' if it only affects men, preferably white men.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:56 PM
19

The math doesn't work, the courts just don't give a shit. Family courts throughout the first world are manned primarily by feminazis.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 11:38 PM
9

to the feminist, nothing is ever feminism's fault. It's why I don't listen to you people.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 11:30 PM
0

The liberals of this thread are downvoting this entirely because of the source. Fuck the left, and fuck this shitty little sub if it keeps playing these political games.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:35 PM
1

Funny how feminists never do this all the things men do around the house. There are landscapers, mechanics and plumbers; do you figure out how much of this labor men put in? Or do you only do that for the stuff women typically do? I ask, because there are a lot of feminist studies that only count housekeeping as 'house work', exempting yard work and home maintenance, in order to 'prove' that women get the short end of the stick.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:48 PM
1

They are probably starting to feel political heat. Think about it: in ten years, conservatives who came of age in this regime are going to filter into congress, and every time Facebook wants to make a deal, it's going to result in those congressmen dragging Zuckerboy down to the hill and raking him over the coals, because his organization treated them like shit when they were younger men. You see this happening now, with liberals who have decided 'fuck all aspects of decorum' when it comes to co…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:10 AM
8

These people wouldn't have a seat at the table if it weren't for the 'white guilt' types to begin with. So long as there is this, and you do have the UN officially planning to replace white populations with non-white ones, then they get a seat at the table. If you don't like that, tamp down on the anti-white racism of the left and the bizarre globalist impulse to make everyone beige.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:05 AM
13

There's a sickness about a parent fretting that their own biological children are "privileged". Indeed. And if the psyshe community didn't have its head so far up it's feminist ass, it would recognize the obviousness of this Munchausen by proxy as being what it is. A fucking 12 year old on hormone replacement therapy, almost entirely so that she can bask in the 'progressive' limelight.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:02 AM
5

She's performing hormone therapy on a 12 year old?
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:59 AM
21

Same editor, and editors are the ones who make headlines. And editors are the ones who enforce editorial bias. People who use this argument aren't honest people. They are either parrotting lies told by other people (which they haven't investigated at all), or they're trying to mislead themselves (because they have investigated it). But the author doesn't pick the title, both articles would have been approved by the same editor, and that editor would have named both articles.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:58 AM
6

genuinely shitty, sexist, right-wing trolls which give the rest of us a bad name. No, the problem is cunts like you who think that 'right-wing' is a pejorative that belongs in that list. So anyone 'right wing' becomes evil in your eyes. THAT is your real problem with Trump. His politics aren't your politics, and you refuse to admit that, so you drum up all of this other bullshit to justify your hatred. but none of that is real. You only oppose him because he's a Republican. 'ring-wing' as you pu…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:56 AM
2

a president shouldn't be calling anyone a fat pig no matter how fat they are, I don't agree. The office hasn't been worthy of respect at any time in my lifetime. Clinton was a fat cheat who fucked impressionable young interns. Bush was a warmongering psychopath. Obama sold us all out to Goldman Sachs. What Trump does, just looks bad. Those other people, they were a lot worse. Trump acts like a jack-ass. They were traitors, thieves, whores and monsters. I'll take someone who calls Rosie O'donell …
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:54 AM
8

Never forget "Yes, ALL men!" Feminists very much want us to forget this, and that it was often paired explicitly with, 'Not all women!'.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:49 AM
1

It makes them feel emotionally validated. They hate the fuck out of men. They want to both feel thaqt we are inferior AND that they can blame us for all of their problems. That it's illogical is irrelevant, because humans are not logical creatures. We are animals driven by instinct, which is represented primarily as a mixture of impulses and emotions. This is no inherently feminist, though feminism is it's currently dominant expression.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 02:02 PM
15

Fuck the left. They still compare Trump to Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini. A bunch like that can't be trusted. They have no sense of scale, no sense of decency, no sense of the decorum needed to keep democracy alive. they constantly try to rile up their base to get right-wing politicians assassinated--at this point, after it's almost happened a couple of times, they can't even deny it. What other purpose could the 'Hitler' talk have? and Stalin was one of theirs.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 01:49 PM
1

Feminists hate men. They say it all over the media. And yet if YOU say that they hate men, they will try to fucking lynch you.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 01:43 PM
14

So no, you can't. And either way--by what right does the mainstream media refuse to air the criticisms of people like me? And yet they choose to air every goddamned idiotic 'idea' feminists come up with--manspreading, mansplaining, 'fragile masculinity' etc. THAT is feminist privilege--the privilege of being heard without criticism when others cannot be heard at all.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:02 PM
21

The media literally only cares about Sarkeesian because she triggers you so hard. You people only say this shit when you get called out. If it wasn't true, you'd ignore stuff like this, rather than brigading the hell out of it every time it hits /r/all. You guys come in here with no argument whatsoever, repeating the same bullshit you've said for years, and you just downvote everyone who disagrees with you. Look around--all of the people who actually suscribe here have 'controversial' daggers ne…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:50 PM
19

No, you're just here to be a sperg and trash the place. I don't care how many autistic feminist upvote you, you're just here to shit up the place. You have no valid criticism whatsoever. This isn't about the actions of feminism--it's about the mainstream media never once criticizing feminists or feminism, the way they do every other idea. If you want to disagree, find me a mainstream media article written since 2010 that is legitimately critical of feminist ideas. I've asked this of a lot of you…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:47 PM
20

It means 'to soften or make seem less unappealing'. So yes, I know damned well what it means. The mainstream media will bend over backwards to mitigate any god-awful thing a feminist says. What the fuck were even thinking, writing this? Edit: /u/MorganPOW, I want you to fucking answer for this, because it emblematic of everything wrong with you people. There are indeed two possible ways to read what I said--one of which makes sense in the context, and one of which does not. You purposefully chos…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:44 PM
22

ITT: Feminists throwing a fit, but being unable to find even 1 single article from a mainstream news agency critical of feminism from this decade. Not one. THAT is feminist privilege. shit, just look at the feminists refusing to accept criticism right here in this very sub.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:43 PM
9

I get what you're saying. But you're saying it for extremely misleading and dishonest reasons. Being too thin isn't healthy. But being thin, no matter how little you exercise, will reduce strain on your cardiovascular system, which will make you much healthier overall than a fatter person who exercises.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:33 PM
8

Going forward, preventing Obama-appointed judges (all of the 'men can't sue under title IX because I said so!' judges were appointed by Obama) from moving up the ladder should be a fairly high priority. His judges were unusually partisan, particularly on gender issues, and absolutely refused to ever rule against his administration. Even Bush II's judges had a higher rate shooting down that administration's crazy ideas, and Obama's have had with his. And it's not like that hurts a lot of leftist …
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:26 PM
5

Tell me, do you defend tradition when it's women getting the short end of the stick, or are you exactly the kind of cunt I expect you to be? Demanding 'equal rights' and special privileges?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:10 PM
5

Oh look, it's the usual suspects chiming in to go 'Sexism is fine if it makes you more money!'.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:09 PM
10

No, it's not. You do not have 20+ years in the restaurant business. And anyone who has regularly eaten at restaurants knows you're full of shit. They start to the waiter's right and work their way around the table 90% of the time. That's how they do things at YOUR restaurant, maybe, but that's because you're a sexist cunt and make the rules. It is not standard, whatsoever. I'm a 35 year old whose job has taken him all across this country, and outside of an extremely narrow band in the deep south…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:08 PM
5

From what I've seen, they typically 1) wait for someone to speak up first or 2) start at the person immediately to the waiter's right. There is no 'ladies first' policy. This person just made that up.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:04 PM
3

Surprise, surprise; a feminazi names /u/Rabid_Pink_princess thinks that pro-female sexism is 'good sense'.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:02 PM
6

You're just lying. I've never seen this at a restaurant. Not once. I'm 35, and I've never seen it happen.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:01 PM
14

Cite me a source then. When was the lastime a mainstream news site was critical of a feminist? Or feminism in general? When you can't find one--that's feminist privilege. the privilege of having your ideology, and only your ideology, assumed to be true without ever having to prove a damned thing. And any criticism of you is heresy, as you asshats from /r/all prove with your constantly REEEEEEing. Edit: amazingly, my comment is 'controversial', and yet not one of these whinging feminists that dow…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:42 PM
31

Do you have any legitimate criticism of it, or are you just here to shit up the place? Feminists say and do all kinds of wretched things...and the media white knights for them. Criticize feminists, and the media says 'criticism of feminism proves that we need more feminism!'. Feminists scream 'KILL ALL MEN!!!' and that they 'Bathe in male tears' all over twitter, and when the media writes about it, they just got 'lol, it's just a joke. Fragile masculinity can't take a joke'. But you want to pret…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:39 PM
33

No, it's completely true. A feminist can say or do anything, and the mainstream media will literally bend over backwards to mitigate it. Or, if it's terrible enough, they will refuse to cover it. Meanwhile, if a conservative just rolls his eyes at a woman, it becomes a talking point for MSNBC.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:37 PM
12

As recently as the early, 00s, this kind of sex-negativity would have been extremely uncommon on the left, outside of certain sectors of feminism.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 02:09 PM
2

I'm upvoting just to piss the whiny feminists off. They complain about literally everything being unfair to women, even the things rigged in their favor. Then they throw a shitstorm whenever someone brings up an actual injustice towards men, and claim that pointing it out is 'hatred of women'.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/17 01:58 PM
2

Oh look, some feminist who doesn't care about injustices when they happen to men. So, any feminist, really. Edit: honestly, fucktards, how is pointing out an injustice toward men actually mean 'Hating women'. Do you accuse every feminist who brings up rape, of doing it simply because she hates men? I fucking doubt it. So shut the fuck up already.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/17 01:57 PM
24

You make the mistake of assuming that comments are representative of users. Explain all of the highly upvoted posts on reddit, then, with extremely hostile, agenda-pushing comment sections?
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:03 PM
2

Same company. It's proof of their misandric intent. It looks of a piece to me.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 04:48 PM
1

Then explain their doodle policies. Always have something for holidays celebrating women, always just tell me to go fuck themselves. Google is definitely a SJW company.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:33 AM
4

Something I'm sure you've said to no feminist, ever, despite it being for more warranted.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:31 AM
6

I think it mostly has to do with you being a concern trolling feminist.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:30 AM
14

ITT: Feminists from all engaging in nitpickery that they would never inflict on their own movement. A thousand feminists saying, 'HOW IS THIS IMPORTANT!', who are somehow always silent when feminists start babbling about manspreading, or about the wage gap, or about far more dubious issues on the feminist side of things. But somehow they always have time to get pedantic with MRAs.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:29 AM
1

If all you've got is shit that happened 60 years ago, then fuck off. Today's problems today. Yesterday's problems don't matter anymore.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:54 PM
2

I'm 35, and I remember a time when the left acknowledge that globalism was a pretty horrible thing that had destroyed the middle class. If you support neoliberalism, then you support free trade, 'guest worker' programs, and the privatization of all public goods. Hillary Clinton supported all of those things, and until her predecessor, they were all rightly opposed by the left. Many of us used to be on the left before you decided to say, 'LOL, fuck mainstreet, let them eat lectures on intersectio…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:52 PM
8

Yeah, but they'll blame it all on men. Meanwhile, men won't cry primarily because women will judge them for it. But that's totally the fault of patriarchy and men everywhere.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:48 PM
3

This is the sickness that is Britain: they actually give women a financial motivation to lie about being raped.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:38 PM
3

Fuck that. I'm tired of winning a high ground we never get credit for, and which gives us no tactical advantage. If you care about issues, then seeing those issues solved is more important than your petty moralizing.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:28 PM
10

Just like the sticky at the top of this thread. If someone says something terrible about all men, nobody blushes. Someone says something terrible about A woman, and half the women and white knights on this sub throw a fit. I mostly blame the mods for not tossing them out on their asses, and the admins for indulging idiotic ideological nonsense. I swear to god, it seems like not one Millennial owned national business knows how to act like a group of adults.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:04 PM
1

For a man, maybe. For a woman, it'll be until they convince themselves that she's a fine upstanding person, and it was really all just postpartum depression that's to blame! I don't trust statistics derived from men, when applied to women, in the criminal justice system.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:02 PM
6

Why do you think that absolute no money should ever go to men? You're the hatemonger here, retard. You're the one saying 'Money should only go to women!'.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:48 AM
5

You're getting downvoted because you basically admitted to not caring about men's rights because some MRAs are icky. You're a concern troll.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:45 AM
5

It makes it hard to justify the core values of the mrm. How? Your statement makes no sense whatsoever. How do you support the left, given how Antifa sentiments are never far away from those subs? I doubt that this is a logic you apply to any other movement. So I doubt the honesty of your intentions.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:44 AM
6

Because it's an excuse, you fucking retard. You get shit on because you want to throw men overboard in order to please your liberalism feminist pals.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:42 AM
-1

Feminists site sources, and most of the time the sources don't even say what feminists claim they say. So what good is a source, honestly? Nobody really looks them over. Nobody checks them out.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:39 PM
3

You severely underestimate the amount of sexism that still exists in higher education, especially STEM. Sexism you oddly can't prove. You're a feminist. Feminists lie--have lied about everything since I was a kid, from the wage gap the to notion that the Superbowl makes men beat their wives. And you're lying now. I'm not 'underestimating' shit. You didn't grow up hidden from the world, where the rest of us couldn't see how you were treated. you grew up right there alongside us. We saw how you we…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:37 PM
2

In our society, we grow up learning that some fields are only for men and other fields are only for women. No you don't. You grew up being told you could do anything you want to do, same as boys--shit, more so, with all of the 'girl power' bullshit that's been floating around for twenty years. You get told you can do things boys can't do. I'm sick and fucking tired of lying feminists acting like they grew up in the 1950s. Boys went to the same schools and took the same classes you did; we heard …
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:34 PM
3

You're ignoring the power of teacher's unions. If you can't fire the shitty teachers, you'll never get new, better teachers with those wages, so it's a waste of time.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:30 PM
1

All gender politics aside, does anyone else have a problem with how little early child educators get paid? From what I remember of the teachers at that age, not really. Most didn't really do that much, and the kind of 'molding' most of them did were extremely biased and often very sexist, so no, I don't want to pay them more. Teachers unions are too strong. We won't get rid of the shitty, feminist teachers who make boys sit outside while girls pick their seats. We'll just be paying them more mon…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:29 PM
7

This is what feminists do: first, they create problem between the genders. Then they turn around and blame it all on men, and pretend that men are never once troubled by said problem. Con men and fraudsters, every last goddamned one of them.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:28 AM
2

She's actually telling the truth. The average cup size in Hollywood is one full size smaller than the average cup size in the US. And big-breasted actresses have indeed had difficult gaining work, because big breasts are the single most intimidating feature one woman can have, that other women will hate and envy her for. Women hate large-breasted women, and as a rule, don't want to accept them in their entertainment unless they are fat. It's a hilarious thing to read, but she's actually very rig…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:25 AM
3

Describing a country lead by Malcolm Turnbull (even if his party did only win by one seat) as " incredibly left winged liberal country" suggests a lack of knowledge of the liberal left wing. And this statement suggests a lack of knowledge as to just where the entire Australian political system fits on the political culture. Obama was more conservative than Maclom Turnbull, instituted a shit ton of austerity and basically destroyed the rural sectors of this country thanks to a slavish devotion to…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:23 AM
-14

ITT, the usual suspects declaring that this is not a men's rights issue. The mods of this sub suck ass.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 11:29 AM
2

I see no reason to accept that. I see no way for HR to be anything but what it is now, so I think it should be abolished altogether. It's really just an attempt by companies to repeatedly skirt the law.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 11:27 AM
1

If they are necessary, how did we make it for thousands of years without them?
/r/MensRights03/07/17 11:26 AM
-2

I don't listen to this sub precisely because there are far, far, far too many people shilling for feminism. If you came her to talk about the evils of antifeminism, then fuck you. I will never believe anything you have to say.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:17 PM
7

Or, the panel was biased toward women, and by blinding it, they removed the bias.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 03:50 PM
38

So called 'first wave' feminists were not feminists. They never called themselves feminists. Neither the word, nor the movement, even existed at that time. what happened was, feminists basically retroactively 'baptised' a bunch of church-marm, T-totalling conservatives into their movement in order to make it seem like they had a much larger pedigree than they ever legitimately had. But those people were NOT feminists. They never called themselves feminists. They were mostly members of church gro…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 03:48 PM
0

Well, they pretty much rule one of the two major political parties in the US, so you're just full of shit.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:01 PM
-10

Oh look, another libertarian cunt who refuses to ever take action against anything anti-male. If the mods banned every fucktard who made a comment like this, or 'How is this related to men's rights', then maybe this sub wouldn't be completely fucking worthless. Edit: You know it's true. Nobody who really cares about men's issues comes here. It's all feminist trolls, concern trolls and whiny progressives who want to complain that a movement made of mostly men isn't favorable enough to feminism or…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:57 AM
6

So what? They're allowed to attend a meeting at a conference. They are entitled to that by the ticket they purchased for the conference itself. And they are entitled, due to the VicCon code of conduct, to better treatment than this. Why the fuck do you liberals keep making these rules, and then refusing to enforce them against your fellow liberals? Do you have any idea how completely fucking evil that is? A sign of utter totalitarianism and authoritarianism? That 'different rules for different p…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:45 AM
8

All the proof you need that both feminists, and the liberals who want to control what goes into video games, are terrible, horrible, hypocritical pieces of shit. If you make a rule, you fucking live by it. I am sick as shit of liberals making rules, and then only enforcing them against conservatives. THIS is why books like 'Liberal Fascism' exist, and it's the current Democratic party that's to blame for making a wet fart of a human being like Jonah Goldberg essentially correct.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:42 AM
2

If this sub weren't worthless, this would be the top reply, not 'We have to attack right wingers and be nicer to feminists!'. The actual top replies discredit the entire conversation.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:39 PM
2

I will never trust anyone who calls themselves a feminist. Introducing yourself as a feminist just destroys your credibility with much of the MRM. If you guys wanted to play this game, you should have done it ten years ago, when most of us might have listened. Not now, though. Now, you're clearly trying to co-opt us, so fuck off.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:37 PM
2

Bullshit. You want to cast off people who disagree with you ideology. You want to cast off anyone critical of feminists, critical of leftists, critical of the Democratic party. It's very obvious what the biases of this sub's moderators are at this point.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:35 PM
1

Agreed. Fuck this guy. If his 'beliefs' are adopted, the MRM will be gutted. Most men are not left-wing. Most men are not feminists. If you concern yourself with feminist and left-wingers, you are--buy simple virtue of demographics--putting the interests of women ahead of the interests of men. And that means you've got no business being in charge of these discussions. This sticky just reinforces my belief that this sub is useless by choice.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:34 PM
1

Too many people here are too concerned with what liberals and feminists say about them. People like that can't be trusted to lead the MRM. They just can't. They are uncle toms by nature. They don't really care about Men's rights, not if it means some liberal somewhere will say something mean about them. Why should I sign up for that?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:32 PM
-1

In war, the moral high ground doesn't mean dick. No army has ever defeated a rival army because they held the moral high ground. Morality will not stop bullets or arrows. You're just an idiot. You don't want to be effective. You just want your liberal friends to stop saying mean things about you.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:31 PM
2

No, we'll never win anything so long as people like you care more what feminists think, than what the majority of men think. People like you--not red pillers--are why this sub is all but dead. You make war against your fellow MRAs so that you don't have to be seen as 'icky' by your leftist friends, and as a result, most men want nothing to do with you.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:29 PM
0

It can ignore the mixture of leftists and libertarians who come here, and who decide for very different reasons that no one should ever do anything about anything that gets posted here. We can't protest private institutions, because that's wrong! We can't protest feminists, because that's anti-left! We can't do anything, because one interest group or another has a stranglehold on the conversation here.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:28 PM
1

Liberals getting pissed that facebook treats white men like any other racial and gender combination, instead of using the 'power+prejudice' liberals want them to use.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 06:22 PM
4

What do you think they mean when they say, 'Listen and Believe!' They mean, 'hang that son of a bitch rapist without a trial', make no mistake about that.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:13 PM
3

No, it's exactly the same thing. She hates people due to an immutable fact of their being. Both the KKK and Feminists are responsible for creating a legal environment hostile to the people they hate. What's the difference?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:12 PM
4

Indeed. Racists admit what they are. Feminists will scream about 'toxic masculinity', 'mansplaining' and 'the patriarchy!' all day, but never acknowledge that maybe they issues with men.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:11 PM
3

The average american woman is a man-hating whackjob.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:08 PM
6

Amazing how different they treat one of their own who violates the rules. Liberals are, at this point in time, fascists. They believe in enforcing the rules only against some people -- that some people are inherently more deserving of rights than others. Special rights for people who agree with them.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:06 PM
-8

We should demand no resignation. High road or no road. You idiot libertarians are fucking retarded. Why should I put any effort into your movement when I constantly see 'We shouldn't bother doing anything about this because it goes against my extreme ideology to believe that we have a right to do anything!'? Why should I care about men's rights if none of you do? You don't actually want to do anything about this, ever. so why the fuck should men care?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 11:07 AM
2

Oh look, a liberal unable to respond to a conservatives points simply changes the subject. Surprise, surprise.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:44 AM
2

No it isn't. They don't just want them restricted. they want guns restricted entirely because they hate the Republicans who like owning them. I don't buy for even one second that the averal liberal actually cares about guns. the average liberal doesn't even know anyone who owns a gun. What they care about, is a puritanical need to control the lives of everyone--especially the people they disagree with with--and a need to punish (as all puritans do) everyone who doesn't go along with their way of…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:42 AM
2

No, it's not. It contributes to a society that thinks men have to be 'tamed' by women, and that part of this 'taming' process involves crushing every last bit of individuality out of us, and crushing the idea that we matter as people out of us so that we live to serve women and society, but never ourselves. You and everyone upvoting you is a goddamned fucking retard virtue signaling with this 'I'm proving I'm better than a feminist!' bullshit. You don't actually believe that men's rights matter,…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:38 AM
2

This is not remotely funny, and you think it is because you're a cunt who excuses jokes about abusing and stomping the will to live out of men because you're a cunt.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:36 AM
0

That this is highly upvoted just makes me think that this sub is worthless. 50 MRAs think that this is no big deal? fuck every last one of them. You know what I don't want to copy from feminism? this 'There are many feminisms' nonsense. If you don't actually believe in defending the rights of men, you can go fuck yourself because you aren't an MRA at all. Fucking troll, is what you are, getting upvotes from the feminazis and man-haters from /r/all.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:35 AM
1

Liberals won't take responsibility for anything, will you? 'Sure, I voted for them. doesn't mean they represent me!'
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:34 AM
0

That is exactly how it works, buddy. Those are your leaders. You support the party they lead, you support them. That's partisan politics. You vote Democratic, the Democrats who end up in power are your fault. They represent you. Because you fucking voted for them. Stop trying to weasel out of that. It's the stone cold truth.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:33 AM
1

Sure. Vote for people who think you're literally the spawn of satan because they lie about supporting you think sounds nice (that I guarantee that the Democrats will never actually make law, because it doesn't help their campaign donors). See how that goes for you.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:31 AM
2

I won't vote for a feminist party no matter how otherwise good they are. Voting for people who hate you...that's tying your own rope, buddy. I don't care how many things you agree with them on, at the end of the day, they would throw you down a deep dark well if they could get away with it, and they wouldn't think twice about it. They don't believe in equality, not of any kind. They only believe in pandering to minorities and women, and the biggest way they do that is to blame everything on whit…
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:29 AM
1

Maybe not, but liberals hate ME. Conservatives hate people who are not me. Who am I going to vote for? Because the only thing I really care about is keeping the people who hate me out of power. You can damned sure bet that minorities don't give two shits that the people who they vote for hate me, so why the fuck would I care about them? I'm not ending up persecuted or in some shit re-education camp just because I wanted to be a 'better man'.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:27 AM
10

Who gives a shit? You people are such cunts. 'the police should be allowed to do whatever they want if I don't like what someone says'. Seriously, stick a lamp up your ass and turn the power switch on.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:23 AM
3

Qualified immunity needs to be repealed. It is the single greatest barrier to holding the police accountable for their wrongdoing. Without qualified immunity, police brutality, police lying, planting drugs and propping all but ends immediately. The only reason it exists, is to protect the corrupt and the evil with government power. Because the government cares more about preserving its power than protecting its citizens.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 03:09 PM
1

We don't believe you, and you come off as a white knight. Never wise to piss in the punchbowl when people are venting, bub.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:07 PM
3

Shit, I bet she's never even mentioned that he worked nights. She just says he had no day job, and let it sit so that everyone assumed he wasn't holding up his end of things.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:06 PM
1

Wost single mothers are such because they made bad decisions, terrible decisions. She's already proven she couldn't keep one relationship going--either she chose a dickhead, or she drove a good man away. Either way, it's not something you trust.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:05 PM
1

At this point, I need a reason to believe otherwise. Too many of these people have said things like this, too many of these countries want to make it illegal to put women in prison at all (as did Hillary Clinton's campaign platform). So when people say this, I need a damned good reason to believe that it isn't for the same reason that everyone else who says it, says it.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:00 PM
1

Some of them undoubtedly have. Crazy people find it easy to see things that aren't there.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:52 PM
4

It won't be enforced that way, though, and we all know it. Feminists hate men, and pursue these policies in order to oppress and persecute us.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:49 PM
1

In all fairness, none of these complaints are coming from her.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:45 PM
3

He got paid the same way. Some idiot counted up his entire worth, and acted as if he got all of that money up front for MoS. this is all based on a lie anyway.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:42 PM
1

I don't buy what you're selling. This isn't about 'actors', it's about women. You don't give a shit if people get paid what they're worth, you only care if women make lots of money. Stop pretending that this is about anything else.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:42 PM
1

Why don't you have a problem with the men making this number, then?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:40 PM
2

That's how the job market works, dipshit. Women need to stop asking for special treatment, and then claiming misogyny when they don't get it.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:39 PM
1

This guy would find a way to deny that Hulk hogan juiced in the 80s.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:38 PM
2

The amount of effort you're putting into denying the obvious is laughable, as is the number of teenage boys upvoting you. 50 year old men don't look like that without help.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:38 PM
1

They don't look like normal people at all. They did not have years to get those physiques. You're post is a mix of lying and putting out irrelevant bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:35 PM
1

That you all started brigading over this does look really fucking suspicious. You're a party shill. This makes the Democratic party look bad, so you brigading fucksticks have taken issues with it. you don't matter though. Men as a whole are turning away from the Democratic party in droves. Brigade, downvote, bully, pretend and lie all you want. It won't matter. Men are increasingly waking up to the evil that is neoliberal feminism. You push feminism to 'prove' that you're really good liberals, a…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:32 PM
2

Explain this to me then, you brigading fuckwit, if it's a 'marxist' ideology (which it just isn't; using some marxist frames doesn't make you actually marxist), then why does its support only seem to come from elite sectors? Why are most feminists upper-class? Why do corporations, and the Democratic party, and so many other elitists institutions (all major colleges) push this, if it's marxist? Why is it only rich people supporting your ideology?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:28 PM
1

The term 'Useful idiot' It has become impossible to ignore that feminism an ideology of the elite, by the elite, for the elite. It has almost no support whatsoever in general society. It is constantly forced down our throats by the upper class, by academia, by corporations--by neoliberals in the Democratic party You all can deny this because you're democrats and don't want to admit that your party has a problem, but you can't downvote people in real life, and if you stick with neoliberal feminis…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:24 PM
33

Which we both know won't be regularly allowed. Or this wouldn't be a law. You're going well out of your way to defend some reall fucked up shit here.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:19 PM
15

I have a feeling that you don't think anything 'bad' can be laid at the feet of feminism. Feminists fight damned hard to keep things this way, though, so yeah, it can be blamed on them. They're the reason it's still the law.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:18 PM
11

The minute this hits all, the same feminists who brigade every post will swarm in here to call this a lie, to scream that these 'feminists' are not 'real' feminists. Or that they are actually traditionalists (in reality, I don't see much difference between the two. Both are hellbent on maintaining the male gender role at all costs). Because the mods here never ban feminists. They love to punish MRAs who disagree with them, but they never ban the feminist brigaders because of some bullshit 'free …
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:15 PM
1

You're just a cunt troll at this point. A man was stabbed for being man there is no way to argue that it isn't an MRA issue. You're just a little, lying cunt troll.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:25 PM
1

To liberals on reddit, conservatism is considered a crime against humanity.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:23 PM
4

Not really. He stopped when she said she didn't want to be filmed. And you're trying to use this to justify three pigs killing an innocent man?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:23 PM
1

I just know, judging by the upvotes, that this will have the feminists' from alls' panties in a bunch. They'll talk shit about men using terrible language constantly, and none of these feminists here will be on record anywhere calling out the amanda Marcottes of the woirld. But they will happily pour in here to call men out for things they wouldn't even look twice at if it came from feminists.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:50 PM
6

He didn't. He had one accusation in his history, which never went anywhere. These people want to remove innocent until proven guilty, and this is a pretty strong piece of evidence.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 01:39 PM
1

You guys look like a brigade...You ignored the top-line comment, and focused heavily on an internal one--a clear sign that someone linked to a comment, and that you didn't actually enter from the top of the thread.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:23 PM
1

People like you are why I won't sub here. You're more concerned with feminism, than men's rights...but you're very quick to tell us how nothing is actually men's rights, ever. And yet the mods just let you troll over...and over...and over.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:18 PM
1

Politifact 'confirmed' everything HRC said--even the things they had previously called lies when Bernie or Trump said them.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:17 PM
1

ITT: the same feminists who would ban anyone and everyone from their subs, brigading and generally acting like cunty assholes.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:16 PM
1

It doesn't matter. Left-wing feminists from /r/all are going to brigade and circlejerk in here no matter what they do. Then, the moment anyone who even kind of disagrees with them in one of their subs, they will ban that person, and then write an algorithm banning anyone else from the subs they frequent from joining in the conversation, either. Because feminists are the biggest hypocrites on the planet.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:16 PM
1

His approvals have been sinking like a stone since he got elected. He will personally lose quite a bit, tbh. I know that this is a liberal site, but it's hard to argue that he's in a good position right now. He's grasping wildly for relevance amidst increasing unpopularity for both himself and its party.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 12:29 PM
2

Not really. Inane idiots require these things. All postmodernism actually means (and I agree that it's a dangerous idea because clearly, too many people are too stupid to understand this point) is that while truth certainly does exist, our own biases and the limited nature of our information prevents us from actually knowing what that truth is.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 11:10 AM
-9

No, and you're insane for even saying this. You and the people who upvoted you need to get shot and tossed in an ocean somewhere, you perverted, child-molesting fucktards.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 11:06 AM
2

Liberals never think that their pet groups (women, minorities, etc) should have to follow the rules. Those people are children in their eyes, and can't possibly be held accountable for their actions or forced to live by the same rules as anyone else.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 01:37 PM
0

A stupid term, but not invented at all.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 12:31 PM
7

I'm 35. It's been that way my whole life. Feminists are very good at convincing people that they used to be reasonable. They have never been reasonable people/
/r/MensRights07/06/17 12:31 PM
5

A little boy who thinks he can get rich telling feminists what they want to hear.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 12:29 PM
2

A tiny child who has lived her whole life in luxury, lecturing others on what a victim she is. Pretty much the perfect representative of feminism.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 12:28 PM
3

'Equity vs. equality' is just a bit of Orwellian feminist nonsense. Equal is equal. Trying to muddy the water is just their attempt to trick us.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:05 PM
2

Did expose a lot of feminists for being man-hating complainers who look for petty nonsense to bitch about during the deepest recession in a century.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:02 PM
1

ITT: Feminists bringing up things that have nothing to actually do with this in order to 'defend' one of the most psychotic feminists on the internet. When they do things like this, it just reinforces how evil ALL of them are. That they read this, and still get angry at the MRA is all I need to know about them. That it gets their backs up proves that feminists will always defend each other, always jerk each other off no matter how ridiculous they are being.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:01 PM
4

Feminism is, what feminists do. This action was taken by feminists, therefore it is feminism.
/r/PussyPass04/06/17 12:02 PM
13

This is certainly causing me to lose a lot of respect for women. And to see them as dishonest, lying, narcissistic whackjobs who demand to have everything their way, and refuse to ever give an itch on anything.
/r/PussyPass04/06/17 12:01 PM
18

How is 'the son' recognizing anything here? You're using force and double-standards, not anyone's compliance. How deranged are you, exactly, that you see the world in a way that is completely and utterly indefensible?
/r/PussyPass04/06/17 12:01 PM
2

You're right. This isn't white vs. black bathrooms. This is white bathrooms, and telling black people to go piss in a ditch. This is why most people despise your god-awful, hate-filled ideology.
/r/PussyPass04/06/17 11:59 AM
22

This SJW bullshit has made me a shit-ton more 'racist' than I ever was in the past. They want to make minorities vs. white people, let them. That's a battle white people have been winning since Charles Martel.
/r/PussyPass04/06/17 11:58 AM
13

The elite using feminism to divide the working and middle classes, convincing women that they are oppressed and that men (and not, say, the elite) are their oppressors so that class solidarity is impossible. These people think Hillary Rodham Clinton is more oppressed than a white guy making 15k a year pumping gas in Alabama. What more needs to be said? Feminism is a cancer on democracy and society itself.
/r/PussyPass04/06/17 11:57 AM
5

Harvard -- the Evergreen of the East.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:54 AM
-5

And I think pearl-clutchers like you mostly convince new people posting here that this sub isn't serious, and is more interested in calling out men, than helping them. People like you, who repeatedly search for any excuse whatsoever to decide 'this has nothing to do with men's rights' are why I don't sub here.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:40 AM
1

Ah, the Kristen Gillibrand method of handling Domestic violence.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:35 AM
1

This is ultimately the evil of feminism. It creates politicians who see men as people to be punished in order to placate a voting bloc.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 02:38 PM
1

That's not likely to protect her Australia.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:08 PM
6

This is how seriously feminist actually treat rape: it's just a cudgel with which to beat their political enemies.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:06 PM
8

You can always tell when someone came from /r/all. I'm willing to bet you think all of the posts here are 'shitty posts'.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:04 PM
14

How do you know none of the women already offered and he said 'No, no, I'm fine, thanks.'? Because I'm 35, have lived around women my whole life, and have never once seen any of them do anything like that?
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:03 PM
14

He doesn't seem to have done anything remotely illegal, and the school was clearly in violation of the law by being agents of the state and questioning a minor about potential criminality without a parent's presence.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:07 PM
2

Those school officials should be shot in the head and buried in a shallow grave, preferably somewhere the wild dogs can get to them and desecrate their corpses.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:06 PM
6

This isn't a good excuse after they shilled the initial false accusation.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 11:21 AM
1

It's serious enough that if it were to happen to me, I'd be looking for a new job, and I'd a minor pay cut if necessary to find one. There's no future for the man in that company. This is why you can't trust female bosses--they only look out for other women, never for the men they lead.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:34 PM
0

Somehow I doubt you write these responses to 'toxic masculunity' posts by feminists. Typical feminist. When men do something terrible, men did something terrible. When women do something terrible, suddenly people did something terrible.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 01:18 PM
3

It isn't fair, but the fact rich and talented people have more to lose means judges have more sentencing options with them. They can be lenient to let them keep a career, with the loss of the career being the motivator rather than just more jail time. It often works so I can't blame judges for doing it. I can, and I can blame cunts like you for making excuses for them. This sub is a shithole of libertarian bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 11:10 AM
2

So long as feminists--any significant number of them at all--believe this, no conversation can be had with feminists. You can't converse with this kind of insanity.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 10:16 AM
1

No, they aren't. They are very good at convincing themselves that they are, though. That's just a fact of human cognition. You have no idea why you do the things you do. Your brain makes the decision subconsciously, and then invents a rational your conscious mind will accept to explain said decision.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 12:37 PM
0

Ah yes, the point in the thread where insane libertarianism trumps Mens Rights...on a men's rights forum. Or, why this is a shitty sub with no effective moderation, where they repeatedly allow libertarians and feminists to derail every discussion with this bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 12:35 PM
4

... and the Donald was doing the same thing months ago. This isn't true. That's just not how they manipulated algorithms at all. They didn't use bots, they just took advantage of loopholes that kept 'controversial' posts at top, and which counted early 'upvotes' more heavily than later ones. You're either wrong, or flat-out lying.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:37 AM
1

Feminists have a shit-ton of power, so no, no dropping it.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:27 AM
8

Another Obama judge decided to ignore the law and dismiss the lawsuit again--this time with prejudice, which is almost unheard of without severe malfeasance. The greatest thing the Republican party has ever done, was blocking more man-hating Obama judges from taking the bench.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:45 PM
1

That's because of projection. Feminists know that most of the issues they push don't actually matter, but they don't want to acknowledge that. So they single out the few pointless issues of MRAs, while ignoring that most of the other issues are valid, so that they can ignore the fact that abortion is legal everywhere, and women already get preferential treatment by every legal system in the country. Issues MRAs have brought up lately: false rape accusations, abuses of Title IX, custody issues, m…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:41 PM
2

Most of them have legit science behind them, not n ideological belief process from the get-go.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:16 PM
8

It's common enough. You people never admit that anything is a mainstream feminist belief. You commonly declare that patriarchy theory isn't mainstream, and we know that's a lie. Amazingly, the feminists on reddit somehow never see the extremism on their side. Ever. It's always a strawman.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:19 AM
0

It's close. 'Men shouldn't be allowed to make laws about this! it affects women!' is not a viable position to take in a democracy.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:18 AM
1

Does it matter? That's how representative democracy works. They don't get to elect people, and then go, 'How dare you!' on issues specific to them. Women don't deserve special rights in this society, and that's what you're asking for.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:17 AM
1

Sure, if it's done entirely with private money. I'm not. You can't violate contract law just because you're a private entity, and there is no way a contract that says, 'And we get to arbitrarily pull out of our end of this any time we want, so long as we hold a hearing' will hold up in court. It's too one-sided, and gives one signatory too much power not to hold up their end (despite what idiot libertarians think, you cannot in fact put whatever you want in a contract).
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:53 AM
7

But given your longstanding policies, it makes sense when people say it about you. The rise of feminism has been directly correlated with a collapse of the marriage rate, the birth rate and the formation of new households. That is undeniable. You can't say that about MRAs.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 12:45 PM
2

When i was your guys' age, conservatives used to do this kind of thing to make fun of liberals. Now liberals do it voluntarily.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 02:36 AM
1

This is why most men would vote for Adolf Hitler over a Democrat.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 05:55 PM
43

This is the problem with the left. All opnions are okay--unless you disagree with a political ideology only about 15% of the population agrees with at this point.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 12:07 PM
1

Most british news sites do the softcore porn thing. Only the left-wing dishrags don't. There are no good British papers. They are all owned by one party or another.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 12:06 PM
2

Fuck the police. No bigger bunch of white-knighting assholes exist on this planet. If they did their jobs and recommended charges for these women, they wouldn't be in this position. They love to shoot unarmed men, but don't give a fuck about female criminals.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 12:05 PM
3

They refuse to admit it because they not only don't care when injustices happen to men, they outright adore when it happens to men.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 12:04 PM
1

What she's actually saying We read what she said, you fucking hack. We don't need you to spin it for us. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:53 PM
1

I had some correspondence with her when she ran GMP. She is remarkably hateful, loves to refer to men as children and you always get the impression that she is, at most, only half-listening to you and never allowing anything you say to fully register. There is very clearly something wrong with her.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:50 PM
0

We all know who they voted for. Don't spit in my face, kid. These people voted for Hillary, and before that, Obama. I guarantee you that more than a few of them knocked on doors for the Democratic party, too. You're just lying if you claim otherwise. You're a Democrat, and you don't want to admit that these assholes are Democrats. But that doesn't change reality.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:48 PM
–

You're a troll who poisons every discussion she's involved in. You hang out at /r/againstmensrights, ffs. If the mods of this sub were worth even as much as what I piss into the toiled every morning, you'd be banned. But because the mods are idiots who would rather prove how dedicated they are to free speech by allowing shit-stirrers, than they would like to have a legitimate board for discussion, you're allowed to stay. But they lose a shitload more people who might come here regularly if they …
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:46 PM
5

so? This is a Democracy, and women are just as likely to be anti-abortion as men are. This is a legitimate issue of democratic debate. I am sick and tired of liberals declaring every issue they care about out of bounds for debate. EVERY goddamned issue, you people claim shouldn't be up for debate in a Democracy. Every single one, from affirmitive action to Obamacare to Abortion. There is not a single liberal issue that you people think the public should be allowed to vote on.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:38 PM
3

I would walk out of a restaurant I saw this in, even if it was in the men's room, too. This system is too easy to abuse, and I'm not going to pay for food in an establishment that casts a side-eye in my direction.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:34 PM
3

If they did this, I would refuse to pay. Restaraunts have very little recourse if you refuse to pay. The cops won't likely arrest you unless you both refuse to pay AND refuse to leave, because the amounts involved are such that they are trained to leave it up to small claims court. And they are unlikely to prevail once it's been revealed that you have any reason at all to refuse payment. Dissatisfaction with service is generally ground to refuse payment. They'll ban you from the place, but so wh…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:32 PM
3

It helped men? It's been shown repeatedly that this is reason enough for them.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:29 PM
4

Wow, this guy is a complete fucking cunt. Men like this deserve to be fed their own teeth.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:27 PM
1

Decent people. Somethings feminists can't be. These people shit all over men, and you want to split hairs? Fuck that. They chose the name. They want to wave that banner, let them deal with the consequences. I won't remotely trust anyone who calls themselves a feminist. Even if they seem like good people, I will always assume that a viper lurks beneath their masks.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:37 PM
1

People only give a shit on reddit, where 50% of the people are from northern europe and almost everyone is a college kid 18-25. In the real world, feminism is widely despised. Millennials are the least feminist generation since feminism was thought up. And Feminism only appears 'popular' due to a heavy media presence. It has proven to be unpopular in every medium it has been pushed. Even among women, feminism has higher negatives than positives.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:35 PM
2

I'm not saying it's fair. But I am saying that society worked better for more people when it was common for women to stay home. We had more purchasing power and A few women and men got stuck in shit positions, but nowadays men 18-35 have a 30% marriage rate, jobs don't pay enough for people to pay rent, let alone buy a house, and everyone hates each other.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:31 PM
4

Not for the elite. It allowed them to undercut wages and distract the population by playing men and women against each other, leading the overwhelmingly gendered political parties today. It is no coincidence that the rise of feminism coincided with the destruction of the American middle class. And when the shit hits the fan, the elite will point the finger squarely at the feminists, leaving those useful idiots holding the bag.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:29 PM
4

No, you're just being a cunt. Stop pretending that you have any other argument here. You're just trying to piss off people you don't like because you're a trolling cunt.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:27 PM
5

ITT: Liberals who don't want to admit that there's something massively wrong with the fact that the Democratic Party constantly gender-baits and tries to play women against men. Shit, at this point the party is openly laughing about the suffering and deaths of white men. What more do you people need to recognize an enemy for what it is? Not saying Republicans aren't shit, too, but the Democrats would literally sacrifice your lives for a slight improvement in their own electoral fortunes.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:26 PM
15

Idiot child who has lived a charmed life thinks that because someone was a dick to her in hollywood, that the entire world must hate women.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:58 PM
10

Honestly, the lesson in this is one every armed force learned about a thousand years ago: You can't station a large number of youngish men anywhere without giving them some access to sex, or you get some really fucked up, deviant shit. This is why even the anglo countries had to stop with the Victorian bullshit. suppressing sexual urges leads to deviancy and neurosis.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:32 AM
0

Economics is mostly a sham-study anyway, just like feminism is. They use basic algebra to dress up a bunch of voodoo, tbh. Some of it is real (supply/Demand curves, etc.) but a lot of it is proven wrong (their theory on the origin of money is contradicted by anthropological evidence) and at the advanced levels, it's pure ideological drivel. Once you get to economists involved in the government, they are pretty much all shills for whatever crazy theory the elite are pushing at the moment. None of…
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:29 AM
11

Feminists are just like Christians: they refuse to give up the belief that humans are God's special animal.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:24 AM
5

That's only what lefties say when conservatives complain about ideological indoctrination. When it comes to genuine disagreements on issues, then it's their way or you're a filthy anti-intellectual shitbag who hates women.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:21 AM
4

Liberals say that people don't trust 'experts' on global warming or free trade because people are idiots. The reality is, these 'experts' have lied about too many important things for too long to be trusted.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:20 AM
6

The CDC lies. It's a political organization.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:18 AM
3

I get what you're saying. But I don't believe that people like you would really be there for someone like me if I needed help. There have been too many things like this--Things that say 'let's help women!', while forgetting about the men. Like the way the UN refuses to distribute food to men in relief areas, only giving it to women, which may help men with families, but leaves single men to either kill and rob the people who do get relief, or to die themselves. I'm not going to help people if I …
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:16 AM
2

They usually just say that this kind of thing isn't 'helpful'--even the supposedly pro-men's rights feminists will say that.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 04:36 PM
6

It's very obvious that you're either a hack feminist, or some kind of psychotic libertarian who is simple ideologically opposed to law suits.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:16 PM
2

If this is what it comes to, it's vile. That simple.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:15 PM
2

No, to you piece of shit feminists, nothing is ever a men's rights issues. But somehow ,everything--including subway seating--is a feminist issue. That's how we know you're all lying, trolling cunts. The double standard. Without those, you'd have none at all.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:17 PM
1

Blaming the victim is... well... Blaming the victim. No, you stupid cunt. 'Blaming the victim' refers to blaming them for being a victim. A victim can still be wrong or do wrong in some other circumstance, and is still totally responsible for that.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:16 PM
1

Fuck off, troll.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 08:52 AM
1

British people are basically slaves to the crown. They don't believe in freedom. Hell, from what I can tell, they don't even want it. Every man, woman and child with an ounce of self-respect fled Britain a long time ago. You may remember, that's how America got started.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 08:52 AM
1

Oh look, the AMR brigade is here! Ban this fucking poster. This sub is a joke because it refuses to moderate away trolls.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:41 AM
8

It's disgusting that anyone here would upvote this at all. Men have a right to privacy and equal access of the restrooms. If you make it 'all gender', you'll have women taking up all of the stalls and we won't be able to shit. Pissing and shitting are biological necessities, you moron. Everyone fucking cares about the toilet. It's just that nobody talks about it, because we aren't all autistic freaks like you.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:33 AM
6

A tiny portion of society was unhappy with it. They just kept throwing huge fits, and promised that their reforms would not harm men or white people. They lied. And at least traditionalism took longer than 30 years to fail. Liberalism is failing right now, due to a complete and utter lack of decent jobs and over-catering to women as a result of their inability to attract men (because they can't offer jobs).
/r/MensRights06/04/17 08:36 PM
2

Do you really think a male CEO would be as likely to go along with this censorship BS? Read up on how much more supportive women are of censorship than men, and then tell me it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:56 AM
-2

Everyone else on this sub is too concerned with making sure that either we remain a) 100% total libertarians or b) 100% total progressives, that I just don't think interacting with them would be of any value.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:54 AM
-2

Everyone else on this sub is too concerned with making sure that either we remain a) 100% total libertarians or b) 100% total progressives, that I just don't think interacting with them would be of any value.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:53 AM
26

Feminists hate men. Never forget that. This is what powerful feminists do.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:50 AM
6

Or, you know, appeal the judges ruling, as it is in defiance of the law and established precedent, and is clearly the case of yet another Democratic judge ignoring the law in favor of feminist doctrine.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:49 AM
13

Democratic judges have repeatedly refused to apply Title IX evenly. Say what you want about Bush, but Bush's judges regularly sided against him in court. Obama-appointed judges have shown a remarkable reluctance to rule against not only Obama himself, but liberal doctrine in general, even when blatantly in conflict with the law, such as in this instance.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:48 AM
4

'I am hereby going to announce my intention to commit a crime on the world wide web, rendering any subsequent claim I make unbelievable, and making me an easy target for actual rapists.' This is like five kinds of stupid right here.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 11:24 AM
2

To feminists: If your theory of the world is correct, why does everyone in a position of authority in the power structures of this country side with you? Why do they always prevent things like this? The existence of, and the elites decision to ignore, MRAs runs very counter to the notion of patriarchy itself. It patriarchy is real, why is it siding with the feminists over and over and over again?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 11:21 AM
1

It's not just them. Psychology, sociology and economics are all ideologically captured to some degree or another, though the latter is mostly captured by conservatives. And the results of that capture has widely discredited experts in ALL fields. 30 years, economists said this or that policy would improve our loves, but our lives ended up impoverished. Psychologists have drugged our children full of amphetamines. Sociologists just dick around and try to come up with excuses for their pet politic…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:16 AM
3

Why are you even here? At this point, I assume that people like you are just shills trying to make everyone else cynical. 'You all may as well not even try. Just give up. There is no hope!'. I find it hard to believe that someone who actually believes that would waste their time here, let alone use that time to convince other people that their efforts are worthless and hopeless. Yet that's all 80% of the comments on this sub are. I have to assume shills. Nobody else spends their time convincing …
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:17 AM
0

You are a shill--your cynicism is clearly nothing but an apologia. 'We all may as well give up, because there's nothing we can do!' is one of the oldest shill plays in the book.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:13 AM
-4

Yep...Youtube shills, and obvious ones.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:11 AM
-3

They're not banning them, they're just marking them as not being advertiser friendly. You're all just YouTube shills, right? Because all of the top comments here are basically defending YouTube. This sub is a worthless piece of shit.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:11 AM
-4

This is not a shock, nor unexpected. What is a shock, is you cunts on this sub making excuses for it, like it's something we all have to live with and nothing can be done about it. Every time someone points out a problem here, some cunt just like you tells us all why we just have to accept it. What fucking good is this sub, then? Why should anyone listen to anything said here at all?
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:10 AM
1

Chelsea Clinton will never be President.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:07 AM
1

Of course Chelsea Clinton has to throw her two cents in, saying that it's never okay to joke about hitting girls (but only girls). Edit: Feminists know that this is a joke. They aren't really concerned with the effects. What they are concerned with--what every psychotic bitch on this earth is always concerned with--is making other people bow and scrape before them, jump through their flaming hoops. They are pretending to be outraged as an expression of power, pure and simple.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:04 AM
40

When society only served the interests of men, society itself had to change. When society only serves the interests of women, it is men who somehow must change. That is the great evil of feminism.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:17 PM
12

As opposed to the heaps of bullshit you spouted?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 01:38 PM
0

Oh look, some cuntish redditor is accusing people of being a pedophile again. What the fuck is wrong with you people?
/r/MensRights24/03/17 08:10 AM
7

You're just wrong on that one.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 07:55 AM
1

Only for cunts like you looking for excuses to defend the indefensible. If THIS is what you're pissed off at after reading this, you're just a piece of shit cop apologist. End of story.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 10:42 PM
1

which is no less reasonable than MRAs focusing on men in need. This is why I have no respect for this sub. It's full of stupid cunts like /u/strixtechnica who refuse to take their own goddamned side.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:59 PM
1

too judgey.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:47 PM
1

So if you knew that, why did you dishonestly cite the difference in subscribers?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:59 AM
0

Not that different at all. You're just some man-hating cunt from /r/all trying to defend something this obscene.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:45 AM
2

ITT: feminists from /r/all deciding that men's issues don't matter, and that toilets are much more important. Fuck this website, and fuck this shitty 'mens' sub.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:31 PM
1

/u/PWnk is just another scummy feminist defending the indefensible.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:13 PM
1

This won't go well for them, unless another Obama-appointed judge decides that he just doesn't like the implications of applying the law equally again.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:06 PM
1

Fuck off, you concern trolling cunt. Feminists are the enemies of men, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:14 AM
0

Liberalism is the enemy, though, so I don't by what you're saying. Liberals will never take us seriously, period. They hate men, they hate white men specifically, but all men, really. So...yeah. You're just another dumb liberal who doesn't like the social grief you get from your friends over MRA activities, but the thing is, those friends are the problem, not us.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter