TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThatSyd Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by ThatSyd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I think it's possible to approach sociology like an actual scientist, and some of them (overlapping with demography) really do seem to try, but it seems like the majority of sociologists prefer theory to quantitative methods.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 11:42 PM
66

Inconsistency? Hypocrisy? Double standards? From women? Impossible!! I think most progressives (followers of this sub, included) take feminism too seriously. We expect way too much. It's cakeism. Think of them as bigoted trolls. It's certainly a waste of time to try to convince them of anything. The biggest mistake they make is this unshakeable belief in the blank slate, thinking that progress is a matter of social engineering. Social constructionist maximalism leads them in the direction of all…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 05:55 AM
14

Sweet, using intuition I came up with the same result. Some people just know how to write. Some people even write like AI. My girlfriend is an academic and she says Claude writes the way she does.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/26 01:35 AM
31

From what I can tell, it's simpler than that. People are so inconsistent and hypocritical. Most women aren't consistent, and they don't need a man to be consistent. What they ask of themselves, and their partner, is to signal virtue in a way that's consistent with the current moral order. Privately conservative is fine, if not expected, but you need to be publicly, conspicuously liberal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 02:16 PM
1

This sensibly snarky comment is a reasonable critique of victimhood culture, generally (i.e. "man" = "straight white man"...only one identity group is expected to be responsible: condescending/cringe).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/26 04:33 AM
7

Focusing on the discourse (critical theory)... My sense is that any discourse that's entirely the product of a single identity group will suffer from certain weaknesses. We can see this when we look at feminism. Imagine what feminist theory would look like if it was a collaborative project, including male perspectives. It's almost funny to think about, but obviously it would be more grounded, and a lot of the claims about men would be moderated by men. It's almost like...representation matters h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 03:22 PM
1

I appreciate how much effort people are putting into understanding phenomenon like the "alt-right pipeline." I can totally relate. So the most helpful thing I can do is recommend this book "The Myth of Left and Right," or just listen to the authors discuss it on an episode of a podcast or something on YouTube. Basically, the whole idea of a spectrum is garbage. It obscures the truth.There are definitely two tribes, but what it means to be independent is to be somewhat less tribalistic. Less susc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/25 03:58 PM
5

Another data point about common-enemy identity politics leading to hatred toward entire groups of people. I don't know how anyone can argue otherwise. The only tool identitarians have for avoiding this is to sacralize entire groups so that even individual members of that group are now beyond criticism, which is also silly. Unfortunately for men, we're always going to be seen as the oppressor in the silly binary, so...here we are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 08:37 PM
6

That makes sense to me logically, but I assume the reason nobody talks about the Womanosphere is that feminists and trad wives don't want to be associated with each other. The assumption about the manosphere seems to be that certain men have become cynical about women and are creating new discourse, by and for men who have given up on the idea that women are a reliable source of information about these things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/24 08:35 PM
1

Oh, gotcha, I shouldn't have assumed you were in the US. I can see what you mean, but maybe we're applying two different litmus tests (yours for socialist/communist, mine for liberal) if you're thinking that their lack of interest in class issues (presumably ok with capitalism) makes them seem liberal, and I'd say that would sound right in non-US terminology except I can't call someone liberal if they don't fully support free speech, academic freedom, etc. I think of them as progressive (e.g. I …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 05:59 AM
7

I always thought I was totally supportive of trans men, trans women, and non-binary individuals, until I realized that a lot of the left (i.e. TRAs) have become intolerant of anyone NOT 100% fully supportive of trans men, trans women, and non-binary individuals, to the point of becoming completely hysterical, hating anyone who doesn't agree with them on every last detail. People like JK Rowling, for instance? Come on. People want to kill her, and the whole thing seems absolutely insane to me. Ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 05:17 AM
4

What? The entire reason the left is divided about identity politics, wokeism, identity synthesis, or whatever you want to call it is that identitarians aren't sufficiently committed to liberalism. Cancel culture is illiberal. Identity politics is progressive, yes, but not liberal (at least with respect to things like speech, which are kind of important, unless you like the idea of the Gulag). I'm guessing that you identify as leftist, and you associate liberalism with identity politics, but be c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 04:24 AM
2

Including many "TERFs." It shouldn't surprise anyone that there are casual feminists asking why they're being called "radical feminists" for not subscribing to trans ideology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 04:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter