TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

The-Pax-Bisonica Archive

View 1 post and 55 comments by The-Pax-Bisonica on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes I get it, you use arm chair biology to justify being a lousy person. I stand by what I said, it’s just an excuse to be shitty to people because others do it. It’s the ultimate “two wrongs make a right” philosophy. You perceive women to be manipulating you sexually so you manipulate others as some sort of recompense. Spoiler that also makes you manipulative and unappealing as a mate. If that’s the point, great, it sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 01:37 PM
1

Maybe it’s not attractive because so much of it based on lies and deceit. TRP is essentially a philosophy for angst ridden teen age boys. It just shows you’re willing to do whatever it takes to get laid, including abandoning any kind of principles. It’s not rocket science, I’ve never met anyone in real life who was red pill who wasn’t a scum bag. I wouldn’t want them as a friend, so why would women want to be around that longer than short term.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 06:10 AM
12

I would upvote this again if I could
/r/RedPillWomen18/12/21 10:19 PM
1

I have dated a woman taller than me, it wasn’t a big deal IMO
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 07:10 PM
-1

Are you serious? Part of debating can just be agreeing with someone. The number of people who just agree with some random posts on here is legion. In the recent FDS thread, half of them were just agreeing with the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 05:47 PM
0

Holy shit is purple pill the most bitter place ever. The red pill brings pure hatred, but the purple pill has the bitterness on fucking lock.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 06:24 PM
6

It's almost more anti-bad dating and being comfortable and happy on your own than anything particularly useful to find a HVM. Which if we are being honest is a win in and of itself. But I agree, there isn't much in the way of actual advice. And I do cringe a little whenever I see an "I MARRIED MYSELF" with a picture of the accompanying ring.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 05:59 PM
1

Read more
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:56 PM
0

Read more
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:19 PM
0

You are a joke of a human being. You can’t even respond without just assuming your own conclusions and are now just arguing in bad faith. Enjoy your God complex. I hear that non western women love that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 08:50 PM
1

You must be a dumb ass red piller. Thanks for quoting the dictionary at me. That’s why I said code, and not a literal definition. Also I don’t think “read more” is the burn you think it is. Guys like you think western woman are the problem, but woman from any part of the word are still people. Confusing being shamed and physically abused for “being agreeable” instead of mental and physical abuse that they have just succumbed to. I’m sorry that’s woman being equals makes you feel insecure, again …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 08:27 PM
1

Cutting, truly
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 08:20 PM
1

“Agreeable” is code for “do whatever I want without consequences” it’s not the women that are the problem, it’s you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 08:08 PM
1

So you aren’t a boomer? Name says otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 08:06 PM
1

Try again
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 08:02 PM
0

Will do boomer
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 06:40 PM
1

Ahhh here comes the sexist bullshit. Women of other cultures will resent bad behavior the same as western women. They will just do it more subtly and manipulate you with a different set of tools.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 06:39 PM
0

I feel bad for you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 06:38 PM
1

I never was pushing anything as a product. You should marry if you love someone and want to spend your life with them. Doing it for financial gain will always lead to resentment.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 05:26 PM
2

Lmfao marriage as a product. No wonder you don’t get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 04:24 PM
1

How would I know your snarky reply wasn’t serious? I’m also not emotional, nothing anyone on Reddit could say to me would shake my love for my wife. This is whole sub is for debate, but that reasoning every one posting here is insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 04:07 PM
2

For the person who makes my life better every day? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 03:46 PM
0

God the simple amount of unmarried people projecting in this thread is hilarious. If you think marriage sucks so bad then you shouldn’t lose sleep over people choosing to do it. Or could it be that you feel like you’re missing out, so you need to tear it down to make yourself feel better?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 03:29 PM
3

Nobody needs to justify their marriage to you. If you don’t like it, continue not doing it
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 03:23 PM
-1

Because you love someone and want to spend the rest of your life with them, no religion need for that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 03:21 PM
7

Is anybody in this thread actually married or just fetishizing what marriage "ought to be like." I don't see anything wrong with pet names. It's also not anyone's job to make marriage appealing. Do it if you find someone you love enough to spend the rest of your life with them. If you like calling them peanut butter instead of Greg, that's no one's choice but theirs.
/r/RedPillWomen03/02/21 08:21 PM
1

I like reading different points Of views and how people got there
/r/MGTOW231/01/21 11:32 AM
-14

Don’t not marry because some woman you never met sucks. If you don’t think marriage is for you then don’t do it. But if you find someone you love and want to lock it down, go for it. Don’t let other people’s bull shit ruin your life.
/r/MGTOW231/01/21 02:16 AM
25

Don’t dote, they will take advantage of you and not appreciate it. That’s just my Two cents. If a man is worth it they will bring as much value to your life as you do to them.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/21 11:12 PM
1

She isn’t yours, and she didn’t care about you if there are red flags all over. You don’t have to let go, you can just move onto someone else
/r/MGTOW230/01/21 02:56 PM
1

No, because I leaned so much about what I wanted in my bad two years and then five years relationships. I found out what truly mattered to me and what I could and couldn’t tolerate. It gave me the needed perspective to find someone who actually makes me happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 01:06 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 10:38 PM
1

I have a lot of common ground with my wife
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 04:07 PM
-1

I think choosing to be alone isn’t so much a fad, but a natural way some men protect themselves from facing uncomfortable realities about themselves. I know at least one dude who chose this path because he was incapable of changing himself so that he could have a meaningful relationship with someone.
/r/MGTOW225/01/21 02:25 AM
2

Money is more valuable than sex in my eyes, I would rather a significant other blow 20 partners before me than blow millions on dumb bull shit. Also what does that have to do with what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/14 08:28 PM
2

Your partner is well within their bounds to judge you for your past indiscretions. I think they are some what justified in being salty you blew a lot of monry on frivolous items for meaningless partners. Just out of curiosity, did you inherit this money? Because it sure sounds like you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/14 01:21 PM
1

I am evidently one of them
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 04:14 PM
2

See you're doing it again, you're lumping all of women studies together and saying there is a dogma that must be followed, that just isn't the case. but everything related to "patriarchy" needs to be thrown out. Why? Western and Eastern cultures have historically been and largely continue to be patriarchy. Men still hold most most of the seats of power globally, there's a lot of reasons for this, but we still very much live in a male dominated world.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 05:03 AM
3

Then most of the most famous, influential feminists are bad at feminism. If you're redefining words to represent a one-way direction of guilt, and a one-way ratchet of freedom, you're not for equality. If you're driving men and noncooperative women out of academia, you're not a scholar. And if you're declaring entire lines of inquiry off-limits because only a monster would ask questions that the answers to undermine feminism, you're not a scientist. This sounds mostly like relics from second wav…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 04:52 AM
1

Most of these apply equally to men, yeah dress well and keep yourself clean etc.
/r/RedPillWomen08/07/14 04:47 AM
1

You are very confused, any feminist telling you women deserve special treatment is a poor one. Third wave feminists believe everybody is equal and should be treated as such. And no, not everyone is for equality, that is pretty evident from reading many comments from those claiming to be colored blue or red.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 04:35 AM
5

No, most of the people who identify as "feminist" are perfectly nice. This statement doesn't jive with Why I Rejected Feminism: Exhibit A You are still essentially rejecting apples because a few are rotten
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 03:30 AM
1

"Women do not age well. “Cougars”, older women that younger men find irresistable, are an invention of the movies. " I like older women, am I an invention of the movies too? Also pre-nups are one of the most widely misunderstood legal instruments out there. Judges don't like them, they are often viewed as unfair and inequitable, and are almost never actually enforced. Especially if you were dumb enough to not disclose your assets before marriage then you have a 100% of getting it thrown the fuck…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 02:50 AM
3

You should pat yourself on the back because you hate people? Good job I guess, you earned it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 02:39 AM
5

Just because there are mean and demeaning feminists doesn't mean feminism is bunk. This is such a backward view that I see applied to both red pill and blue pill all the time. "these people are pricks, therefore all people who are labeled the same as them are also pricks." It's just a very unrealistic and simplistic way of viewing the world. It's no different than saying all food is bad because some of it is rotten, it's just none sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 02:29 AM
1

Not very different, I already want a more traditional relationship, and am with a blue pill woman who does too. I don't really have any issue finding dates or sex when I'm single as it is, so pretty much the same. I probably wouldn't respect women as much as I do though. So,there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 07:00 PM
8

It's actually committing to another person and valuing themselfs more than you value your self, men do it all the time This seems to be the antithesis of TRP philosophy toward women though, aren't you suppose to value your own happiness and pleasure over that of your plate? Red pill advocates manipulation and mentally torturing your significant other to get what you want, typically physical gratification. So does it only apply to devoting yourself to other men? It sure doesn't seem like you're d…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 09:33 PM
19

You are delusional if you think blue pillars don't get great sex or love from their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 08:25 PM
11

Never met one without children, that cooks relgulary(more than 3 times a week) have met a couple of men so it can kinda work when the guy is the stay at home SO. So, because you've never met one, they must not exist? This is the same as saying "I've never met anyone from Paraguay, therefore nobody lives there." This type of logic is fundamentally flawed, we all only experience a very small percentage of the people the planet has to offer, so because we haven't met them doesn't preclude their exi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 08:19 PM
12

No it's not about division of labor, It's about how the same family structure is treated differently, man works, women doesn't. Red men often deride blue men (beta bux etc.) for supporting their wives/SO but then they themselves desire or are in a relationship where they support their wife/SO financially. Why are these treated differently is the question when ostensibly they are the same act.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 08:03 PM
1

I would accept it, I'm not interested in adhering to lies or misconceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 07:43 PM
11

And I honestly doubt you've seen "many". Well, thank you for calling me a liar, that's cool. So the whole beta being used for their money isn't a prevailing theme in why betas get a raw deal and should turn red pill? The red pillar supports a loving woman that dedicates herself to making him happy and making their house a home. So a blue pillar can't have a wife that loves them and keeps a good home? Are you really trying to say that no blue pillars wife actually loves them? Or is capable of mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 07:15 PM
1

To be fair to sailor moon, that was actually a monster she set on fire, and not in the fun metaphorical sense.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 06:10 PM
1

My advice to you is to not put too much stock in any one persons opinion, even if they are the COO of face book or a writer for salon. At the end of the day these are the opinions of two people, not scientific research of any stripe.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 05:40 PM
6

I have had women interested in having sex with me and have declined their advances, so aren't I the gate keeper in that situation? This isn't a question of sex or gender, merely who wants the other more. The one that desires the other less is always the gate keeper. Whomever loves least holds all the power, fact of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 05:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter