TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

The27thS Archive

View 3 posts and 43 comments by The27thS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:10 PM
2

At least they are leaving you alone. Why would you want to be forced in the same room as someone with deep prejudices against you?
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:19 PM
3

This question has become a bit of a rorshach test with the wide variety of interpretations that have resulted. Some people use it as a form of hyperbole. Some people use it as a form of litmus test to indicate whether you are an ally to women. Some people take it as a literal risk assessment exercise in probability. Some people use it rhetorically to indicate the relative horror of fates worse than death. Some use it maliciously to express hatred frustration and bigotry. And some believe that th…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 02:31 PM
2

I just sit down next to people who sit this way and they always adjust accordingly. Are people really so passive aggressive about this that they would rather pass legislation than simply sit down and assert their space? I sometimes wonder if this isnt connected to Amy Cuddy's power pose model where people are so passive, they feel even less powerful scrunched up to accommodate a manspreader. Why not simply spread back?
/r/MensRights22/06/17 12:26 PM
3

The hamster?
/r/MensRights07/09/15 07:28 PM
1

All ads use manipulative tactics to make a product desirable. What specifically do you envision such regulations looking like with respect to the categories I listed above?
/r/MensRights30/04/15 04:15 PM
1

I don't think these are absurd. I wouldn't mind having such ads banned. I just don't think it is feasible.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 04:01 PM
1

So no advertisements that suggest a particular standard of value? No ads with uniform ideas of feminine beauty. All ads must have a variety of body types. No ads depicting anyone as being foolish or incapable. All ads show a variety of races, cultures, gender and sexual minorities, and abilities. No ads depicting gender roles No ads depicting standards of beauty, wealth, or status I'm not opposed to such regulation, I am just not sure it is sufficiently harmful to actually justify such top downr…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 02:53 PM
1

Tobacco products are demonstrably harmful. The harm caused by advertising in general is less explicit. I agree that ads can be harmful if they influence culture to judge people according to shallow standards but I suspect that is unavoidable. Even if we banned all ads that make a person feel bad about themselves, it wont stop society from developing shallow metrics of human worth. This is why I think educating the populace to see ads for what they are solves the problem more effectively.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 04:28 AM
2

So such ads should be illegal? Is there sufficient justification for that?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:29 PM
1

I would certainly rather these kinds of ads not exist but I don't know of a way to go about making that happen without violating freedom of speech. People are welcome to criticize them but unless the stigma can get to the point that it affects sales I doubt it would be sufficient to motivate change among advertisers.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:19 PM
1

Stereotypes from advertising can harm anyone who takes them to represent the way the world actually works. This is why it is important to educate people to inoculate them against taking such advertisements as genuine representations of reality. People get so caught up on the tiny perfections created by photoshop that they forget that they have never seen any of the inhumanly beautiful people in reality.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:10 PM
10

This would be like attacking advertisements for expensive cars because they further the narrative that a man is only worth the money he makes. We can't escape the social narratives of self worth that come from advertising because advertising explicitly relies on them to sell products. Perhaps a better approach would be to simply learn to see advertising for what it is rather than internalize it's obvious message of "you can't feel validated without our product."
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:21 PM
7

Aside from the fact that all the villains are men isn't this generally a good thing to encourage people to get more involved when they see victimization? A third party who knows neither perpetrator nor the victim is a good way to avoid one persons word against another. This video should have been expanded to include a wider variety of perpetrators and victims.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:49 PM
1

Most of the data I have seen on catcalling is from the victim's perspective. Have there been any attempts to quantify the perpetrators? Do we know for a fact that underprivileged groups make up a significant percentage of cat callers? They are certainly significant in videos but that is not a very reliable metric. What methods would be most effective in reducing catcalling without vilifying men?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:20 PM
1

I don't see how anyone expects any substance from a debate limited to 140 characters.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:12 PM
2

And how many of those liberal democrats live in districts so gerrymandered that it is pointless to run as a democrat?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:20 PM
-8

As long as the progressives in Texas have no political influence, the state will continue to be seen as deep red.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:47 PM
0

I think it is confusing and unnecessary to cite higher acquittal rates as evidence for higher false rape accusations since it does not always correlate with high false rape accusation claims. They should have simply cited the false rape examples directly and made no mention of acquittal.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 06:48 PM
6

How do they tell the difference between failing to demonstrate rape occurred vs false rape accusation being the cause of the increase in acquittal percentage?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:25 PM
6

I find the whole rape victim vs false rape issue to be very curious. Do we see this in other contexts? What would happen if for example, our system became very vigilant about dealing with police abuse, especially with regards to racial profiling. Would it be inappropriate in a context that is supposed to discuss the harms of racial profiling to bring up examples of times when a minority accused a cop of profiling just to get him into the due process? Is addressing a potential pitfall of a soluti…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:04 PM
8

Would making it mandatory for companies to provide maternal and paternal leave affect these statistics?
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:22 PM
1

Do you believe she should be on the sex offender registry or that all other permutations of this age difference should not?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:58 PM
4

Being a men's rights activist is like explaining the risks of choking to a person who is starving to death. I think a more accurate analogy would be men's rights activists are people who bring up the issue of starvation in the company of people who want to ban all food because they know someone who choked to death. As far as the conversation goes I don't think they are talking about the same thing and OP did not point that out to the FB poster. The FB poster interpreted OP's response as "Women h…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:20 PM
1

If men could feel they were able to express emotions they would be more likely to seek help than simply off themselves Women are socialized into believing it is not an option to become a miner or an industrial worker because they are not "feminine" pursuits The media has a very narrow portrayal of men and women in movies and tv shows based on gender norms. If we relaxed gender norms there is a greater variety of characters that can be written. Our culture believes it is not masculine to take car…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:42 PM
1

Something more flexible. Wouldn't it be nice to live in a society where men are not shamed for showing emotion and women are encouraged to consider a greater variety of careers?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:32 PM
0

People are more complicated than we give them credit for. Yes there are certain basic traits that are common to sexual attraction but that does not mean those traits must strongly limit how people behave. A woman who is intelligent or a man who is sensitive can still successfully reproduce. The issue is whether we socialize those people into believing they need to conform to cultural ideas about what it means to be a desirable man or woman. We want people to make their own choices. We just want …
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:14 PM
2

OK how about: fewer male suicides more females working dangerous jobs better written movies with more character variety more acceptance of men interacting with children more women in STEM fields more sex positivity greater variety of career options for both genders more acceptance of LGBTQ greater availability of child care to name a few
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:09 PM
2

Masculinity is traditionally assertive intelligent strong emotionally stable dominant leader. Femininity is traditionally nurturing beautiful emotionally expressive submissive considerate follower. The benefits would be more opportunities for more people. Men and women would not need to be limited to what is socially acceptable based on unquestioned gender roles.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 08:04 PM
-10

The article was not saying men should not express emotions. It was saying men should put their grievances in context. There is a difference between saying "men should never cry or show weakness" and saying "mens issues are in the context of a system that is far worse to women and minorities." The actions of specific feminist groups does not necessarily represent the tenants of feminism as a whole. NOW may oppose shared parenting but they were not the ones responsible for the legal imbalance in t…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:05 PM
-8

Patriarchy wasn't designed by anyone any more than a "wicked Jew" designed income inequality. Some stupid feminists may believe that but that is not a reflection of the movement as a whole. Patriarchy is nothing more than cultural momentum from human history that people finally have sufficient resources to fight against. Feminists are not the one's telling men they can't express emotions, media and advertising is. Feminists are not the ones telling men they cannot raise children. Some extremist …
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:13 PM
2

What difference does it make what we call the cultural source of the gender norms both feminists and MRAs are fighting against? Men want to be free of limiting masculine norms and women want to be free of limiting feminine norms. How is there a conflict of interest?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:46 PM
3

If nobody cares why comment?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:40 PM
4

If the patriarchy does not directly benefit men and in some cases such as child custody, the draft, paternal leave, why are MRAs not also opposed to the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:40 PM
9

I posted it as an imgur link
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:36 PM
4

I dont know what that means but I was hoping for some serious discussion on the issue instead of feminist style censorship.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 03:32 PM
2

fixed
/r/MensRights29/03/13 03:30 PM
6

While I don't think that saying "don't rape" will be sufficient to end rape, there does seem to be a lot of confusion among the populace with regards to what consent means and how to communicate it. I would be in favor of more comprehensive sex education in high schools and colleges on this subject. You might tell a person not to rape but if they are operating under a different definition of rape, they could still commit the act and believe they didn't rape anyone.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:04 PM
0

I don't think women want to be portrayed as precious helpless innocent victims in media any more than men want to be portrayed as disposable. If anything I would argue that both genders are victims of the consistent oversimplified roles. Women are rarely killed in movies because women are rarely significant characters beyond love interest.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:35 PM
4

My journal club actually wrote a letter to the authors after reviewing this article. Dear Drs. Moss-Racusin and Handelsman, Our recent journal club featured an in-depth discussion of your PNAS paper “Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students”. We find the work you are doing on gender disparities among academic scientists to be both interesting and valuable. We especially appreciate your efforts to acquire quantitative data on this topic. At the conclusion of our analysis we were…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:47 PM
1

When I ask feminists they link me to misogynistic pages and claim that the entire men's rights movement was founded by misogyny.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 04:00 PM
1

It seems like most responses are along the lines of "feminism is the extremist one" which is what I was asking about in the first place but there are a lot of good points about why it could be viewed that way. It seems to me that the mens rights movement has some similarities to the new atheist movement where it is in response to extremist feminists the same way atheists are a response to extremist religion. From what people here are saying feminism taken to its extreme is a religion of sorts.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:56 PM
1

Reminds me of this
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter