TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheAngryBird03 Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by TheAngryBird03 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Keanu is the barometer!
/r/MensRights11/06/19 10:30 AM
25

Unfortunately I agree with this.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 06:47 AM
5

Potentially but they are gambling on viralism to gain extra customers than they would have previously had
/r/MensRights09/04/19 05:02 PM
51

Well actually as it’s only a code and there are no checks they aren’t actually charging differently based on gender. What they are doing is advertising a code to women which lets face it is their target audience anyway and pretending they give a shit about them.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 03:21 PM
217

MeN ObJEcTiFy WoMeN - LoOk ThIS AdVeRt PrOvEs iT.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 03:18 PM
33

I thought All lives mattered Edit: hahaha on wait no
/r/MensRights04/04/19 06:04 AM
6

Ok, I don’t really understand what you are saying, maybe that’s why you are getting heavily downvoted, I think people are misunderstanding your point of view.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:55 PM
25

I don’t know where you are getting this information from. Are you just plucking your opinion out the air? If any paper was going to make money on Male outrage; which I suspect is a pretty niche topic to make money on, then it would be the Sun. Edit: I think I am misunderstanding the previous comment
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:30 PM
2

Can you not report this to the Advertising standards authority
/r/MensRights20/02/19 07:54 AM
2

Yeah but not when your a razor company advertising men’s razors
/r/MensRights26/01/19 09:11 AM
2

Fucking idiot
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:31 PM
1

Holy shit that was like a freight train. Feel sorry for the poor guy, hope he gets a good lawyer that can portray what really happened in court I’m sure some of them at the start are screaming “who the fuck is he” as they surround and intimidate the shit out of his family. You can see his little girl is scared as fuck.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:24 PM
13

I’d rather hit them where it hurts. It hurts the most for companies by hitting their revenue so why stop at Gillette. If P&G don’t feel it then no-one else will take note. We have to take a stand.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:36 PM
-10

Disrespectful
/r/MensRights14/01/19 11:34 PM
10

It’s jut had another 2k dislikes in the last minute
/r/MensRights14/01/19 11:32 PM
1

lol bunch of nobs hahaha
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:54 PM
7

I live in Nottingham, the police force is not forward thinking. By not treating misandry in the same was as misogyny, it is backward thinking, no? Their definition of a misogynistic hate crime is a wolf whistle at a woman in public. If a woman wolf whistled at a man in public - well he’s lucky for the attention isn’t he. /s
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:53 AM
10

If your not serious please put an /s. Gay men are still men and deserve the same rights as any other man. If they want to get married it should be their choice.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:32 AM
6

I think you maybe aren’t considering that the drag industry is now big enough that people do it for the money, not attention / publicity - it all equals money.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:31 AM
1

Can you explain this
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:54 AM
3

Oh dear
/r/MensRights21/10/18 01:34 PM
16

It’s not the sending of the texts it’s the incitement of violence. She actually told him to go and punch the c***. While she sent the pictures. She couldn’t know he would knife him but then she said she turfed the victim out her house because she was scared the murderer would come to her house so she understood what she was doing. And she text the murderer to tell him she kicked the guy out knowing he was waiting
/r/MensRights17/10/18 02:32 PM
1

Agreed it’s not the knowledge you get it’s that little piece of paper that means you can use that degree word in the cv
/r/MensRights10/10/18 08:15 AM
13

It’s being reported in the Uk as he said “men invented physics”
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:53 PM
12

Holy shit I just read the article and that is truly shameful. Osaka should have been ecstatic and the interviewer basically said we didn’t want you to win lol
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:16 AM
16

I think you’re in the wrong country my friend
/r/MensRights01/09/18 03:36 PM
3

I’m sorry for you
/r/MensRights29/08/18 11:22 AM
17

The guy following her home lived 2 doors down from her....
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:44 AM
1

What’s not legitimate about that
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:33 AM
-2

Well they won’t if that’s the terminology used
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:13 PM
-2

You might get away with it in this sub but you have to understand if MRM is seen to be legitimate it cannot engage in this approach
/r/MensRights13/08/18 02:32 PM
1

It’s ironic and tragic both fit imo
/r/MensRights13/08/18 02:30 PM
10

"It is as if people don't understand what they shouldn't be doing. As long as you don't grab someone or proposition them, you can take someone to lunch...It is completely obvious how to be professional." Couldn’t offering to take someone for lunch be quickly and easily misconstrued as a proposition? She presents a quote for how obvious it is which shows it’s totally not obvious.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:14 AM
8

I was literally about to quote and say the exact same thing. Anecdotal experience, I work in the UK and had to have a meeting with a woman the other week and my own female work colleagues had been saying some interesting things about this woman and that put the willys up me. When I went to meet her she was sat in a public area but very casually on the sofa. At first I sat on the sofa opposite but it was slightly far away and admittedly a bit awkward. So she said come sit here and tapped the sofa…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:03 AM
-9

Please don’t speak by referencing “her vagina” it discredits everything you say and you will be ignored.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 06:30 AM
-2

Did you ever hear the story of Darth Plagueis the wise?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 06:28 AM
1

So what age is an adult in your eyes then?
/r/MensRights01/08/18 01:01 PM
2

I agree, I cannot understand why you feel it is okay for a person of 20 to have sex with a child of 16.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:37 PM
2

I think reproductive maturity is completely different to actual maturity. I don’t believe teenagers/children have the capacity to make decisions around sex. After all (certainly in the UK) until 18 you are a child. There are a lot of alleged sexual offences reported by young adults and students which allegedly are due to their regret about having sex. (albeit mainly due to alcohol) But people expect a child to make these decisions. I agree that standards do not change biological influences howev…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:32 PM
2

I’m not sure I actually agree with this. I think a 20 year old man should not be allowed to have sex with a 16 year old woman and vice versa. I think at 16 the person is not mentally developed enough to understand what sex means. I understand where you are coming from but how do you implement a ‘variable law’. Imagine the prosecution and defence lawyers trying to argue whereabouts on the scale of ‘variability’ it sits. I think there needs to be a black and white line saying at this age there is …
/r/MensRights01/08/18 07:04 AM
-5

Who are you? Are you even from the UK? Are you Russian? Everyone look I caught one of those spies....
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:33 PM
5

You’re reading it the same as me
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:19 AM
11

So you lost money and your happy? Why? If the law was fair, whatever you bought you should be able to take, no halfsies
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:17 AM
2

You weren’t doing too bad but then you had to spoil it
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:15 AM
4

Thank you for this post I can’t tell u how nice it is to hear this point if view
/r/MensRights13/04/18 06:00 AM
2

Yeah I agree I think it’s more to do with the two recent big cases that hit the news and the fallout from the follow up investigations
/r/MensRights02/04/18 08:49 PM
2

I maybe see what your saying but when a court makes a ruling it means it’s pretty clear cut. Courts don’t just award compensation as a random act of kindness
/r/MensRights22/03/18 06:28 AM
6

Kinda like what’s happening in Japan maybe
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:28 PM
4

Number 2 in your definition is my exact reason why I’m against feminism. Feminism is about the cause of women’s rights above all others. The aim is to create equality but by prioritising women over all other groups the aim will never be achieved. I am for equal rights for all people regardless of gender, race etc. This means I wish to advocate for all sexes, not just men, not just women etc. I feel that advocating for one group above all other is wrong and this is what feminism does, this is why…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 10:05 AM
4

The sub is about discussion which hopefully changes people’s minds in a direction which is equal for all. If individuals don’t listen then they don’t listen but you can’t tar everyone with the same brush
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:53 AM
10

I agree with this and this is why I’m against feminism. I am for equal rights in all areas and some of the systems we have really aren’t equal. In the Uk we have a minister (politician) in the cabinet (like presidents advisors) dedicated solely to women and lgbt groups issues. This minister doesn’t include men’s issues and there isn’t another minister who does. This is at the top of uk government.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:49 AM
1

Well it’s been in place since tv started around 1960s I think, so it was way before current tech, which is why it needs changing. Back when tv started in the uk we had 3 channels up to 1990s so it was a way of ensuring there was actually good programming on tv, whereas now there is so much choice that market forces actually ensure good programming is available.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 09:10 PM
2

I can’t read that drivel. It complains the BBC is out of touch but I think the article is further out of touch.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 03:28 PM
1

Ton
/r/MensRights27/01/18 12:47 PM
1

Agreed, I wasn’t sure if you were UK. My personal opinion is the bbc news and world service should be funded by all (I agree with you on docs). Then they should either, allow adverts on bbc 1 and 2. Or just move to a subscription based model where you can buy it through sky/virgin or just bbc iplayer.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 10:19 AM
1

I agree with you. (Not sure if your from uk) It is very ambiguous despite being a sore spot for some in the Uk for absolutely years/decades. The BBC collect money and enforce the rule/law based upon the threat of legal action and the resulting £1k fine plus court costs. I personally do not agree with the service the BBC provide and would happily do away with the license fee (or pay a reduced fee just to support BBC News and World Service). So that does make me bias. If you declare you do not hav…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 02:23 AM
0

Relevant
/r/MensRights27/01/18 12:52 AM
1

That’s incorrect if you own a device capable of playing live tv they will prosecute you. They don’t care if you don’t watch anything they’ll prosecute you anyway
/r/MensRights27/01/18 12:51 AM
1

They do send inspectors to homes but mostly it’s the threat of being taken to court and fined £1000 that enforces the rule
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:50 PM
0

If you own a device capable of watching live tv, which means any device capable of watching Netflix etc. Then legally you have to pay
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:47 PM
0

Any device capable of playing live tv
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:46 PM
1

You cannot opt out of bbc license fee unless you don’t own a tv or pc or tablet or mobile phone. So basically unless you live in a tent you can’t opt out.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:46 PM
2

If he’s happy then that’s fine
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:01 PM
2

Why be a dick
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:00 PM
1

Oh well I’m glad it worked out: I think feminists see having a baby as their decision only and their right if they choose to. So she didn’t care at the time if he was onboard because it’s her right to decide to have oNe
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:43 AM
3

Wrap up before you get fucked.... up
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:13 PM
6

I think you should tell her boyfriend, I kind of think it’s something I would want to be told
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:12 PM
6

Never thought about this angle, especially when they work out their being used by the woman it’s got to hurt
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:09 PM
3

This is so fucking true it’s cool
/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:04 PM
2

So talking about sex at a work dinner is sexual assault?
/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:08 PM
3

That was an interesting read. I find it funny from the way it was written that when they started the experiment they were convinced it was bias from the interviewers. Then when the opposite result happened it was a big search for answers. It makes me feel like if women are doing better than men in something it doesn’t matter, that’s just the way it is. But if men do something better than women then the big search for answers takes place. What the end result was that despite approx 2-3 times more…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:16 PM
1

Just so you know if feel your plight, I am in o way in your position but I understand your suffering
/r/MensRights09/01/18 03:45 PM
7

Whether positive discrimination exists or not, this comment is so racist!
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:50 AM
78

David Green of think-tank Civitas, a former adviser to the Government, said: ‘There is a wider problem that the justice system and the police have lost their way because of the cult of victimhood and the prevailing idea that the victim should always be believed. That is leading to these grave injustices.’ Wow surprised this was in the article.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:48 AM
3

This comment looks like it's incredibly racist, maybe it's just me but maybe u might want to review and edit it.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:42 AM
4

I wasn't, it was a nice story
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:21 AM
3

Nice story
/r/MensRights19/12/17 10:06 PM
10

Yeah the Uk legal system doesn't give massive compensation sums out. However still hope he gets insanely rich
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:26 PM
7

This is what gets me so often with feminism. Just put the effort into egalitarianism and people can't say no. Like the white ribbon campaign is supported by my local government but why don't they actively advertise supporting non-violence against everyone. I don't get it .
/r/MensRights13/12/17 05:50 AM
0

Maybe you should look inside yourself and become a better person. If men are valued based on how "thirsty" they are then this is not a world that is fair and equal. Is that what men are? Just a barometer for how much of a creep they are to women/others? While maybe no one owes a compliment to one another is it not a better world where one respects each other and treats each other with kindness even if it may not be entirely forthright. It is not wrong or bad to be a nice guy. You do not have to …
/r/MensRights13/12/17 05:14 AM
1

This is incorrect. You did say it to people you barely knew. That's the point. I was brought up to believe you compliment all women because that is being gentlemanly. There are varying levels to what you would say but definitely if a woman was a stranger and you bumped into them by accident or held the door open for them in a shop then it would be fine to compliment them on a nice scarf they were wearing etc. etc. You might not say, you look beautiful, but you might say that's a very lovely coat…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:24 AM
2

I honestly think this, in days gone past it was very gentlemanly to comment that a woman was stunning or looked beautiful even if they didn't. It was part of being a man. I honestly think he was just trying to be friendly and give a nice compliment for a professional looking picture. I think he's too old to know you literally can't compliment a woman anymore.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 09:26 PM
4

Did you read what started the comment chains?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:38 PM
5

I thought that
/r/MensRights25/11/17 12:02 PM
17

No this is true, in the uk you constantly read stories in the newspapers about how women got community orders and men go to jail for the same crime. A woman stabbed her date while she was on drugs this year and she didn't get any kind of custodial sentence because she wanted to be a surgeon and it would have shown up on her record when applying for jobs. A man would have been straight in jail no questions asked.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:33 AM
-5

Yes it does, it comes across as very aggressive which is why I can't really put it on Facebook. My girlfriends mum has apparently made a comment that she feels like I hate women so I can't put this up if I want to stay with my girlfriend, which I do.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:29 AM
251

This was not just in the US Army, the British Army also knew about it and although I can't say they asked soldiers to turn a blind eye there were always plenty of stories about it happening
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:45 PM
5

Yeah but if I remember that correctly it was stupid that he got fired. Then didn't the woman get fired after it went viral and there was a backlash against her and the company she worked for?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:12 AM
9

I think it's about equality, whether that's equality of trust or equality of mis-trust. As long as we have equality I'm happy.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 06:39 AM
4

Sorry what is the point of this post?
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:46 AM
4

Yeah good point
/r/MensRights16/09/17 03:26 PM
4

That's how the courts work. Unless the police can prove that an event 100% didn't happen then the courts make a judgement on who they believe. They believe him but you can't do her for perjury because of that
/r/MensRights16/09/17 11:30 AM
61

Can you say for 100% certain she lied. He admitted breaking the radio so he is guilty of that. she told her story in court which is clearly not true but she hasn't admitted lying. Unless she admitted lying she couldn't really be done for perjury because the court cannot say for 100% it didn't happen. The court has made a JUDGEMENT that they believe him more than her. They haven't said she is lying they have said he is MORE LIKELY to be telling the truth. That is why she hasn't been done for anyt…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 11:08 AM
-5

Can you say for 100% certain she lied. He admitted breaking the radio so he is guilty of that. she told her story in court which is clearly not true but she hasn't admitted lying. Unless she admitted lying she couldn't really be done for perjury because the court cannot say for 100% it didn't happen. The court has made a JUDGEMENT that they believe him more than her. They haven't said she is lying they have said he is MORE LIKELY to be telling the truth. That is why she hasn't been done for anyt…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 11:06 AM
23

Social should take the child anywhere
/r/MensRights15/06/17 05:26 AM
3

I would not have advocated telling the woman to get security. If she walks up to a security guard and says she just saw someone who potentially raped their daughter the security guards could take her at face value and react as if you had done that coming in heavy handed. I think the reaction the op took was right, if there is a friend nearby, let them take the child and then you go get security or call the police.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 09:32 PM
18

But she still got into a motor vehicle well over the limit. That's the same as holding a gun up to someone's head. A car is a lethal weapon in the wrong hands.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 09:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter