TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheBerkeleyBear Archive

View 1 post and 19 comments by TheBerkeleyBear on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
71

TheBerkeleyBear/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:15 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Yeah this makes sense to me. It seems degrading in that it degrades the women's value. A man is raping her and yet the immature male viewer ignores her very real experience because she also has boobs. I think tyciol is wrong because you are lowering her value by disregarding the atrocious violation of her human worth. Yeah we're both attracted to her tits, but being stubbornly focused on them in the face of a women being raped is appalling.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 01:53 AM
2

It's certainly silly to think of it as a responsibility when it's just a liberation. Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 04:52 AM
1

I'm not disagreeing with you there
/r/MensRights13/08/11 02:55 AM
2

Dude, I'm agreeing with toast recon. You don't understand my point. I wasn't talking about sexual assault. I was talking about rape being a sub-category of sex. Allow me to explain: Sex is a broad category of a man's penis going into a vagina/butt Rape is a smaller category within that category. Rape is sex but where one participant was forced or did not consent. Hence, Rape is a sub-category of sex. It's not that fucking hard to understand...
/r/MensRights12/08/11 03:33 PM
2

What the fuck are you talking about? This has nothing to do with what popoi is saying. He's saying rape and sex are not mutually exclusive. Nothing you said in your comment adressed that. Furthermore, why is popoi being downvoted? That makes no sense.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 12:00 AM
1

True words.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:11 AM
3

You can read the rest of the interview if you wish to find out. I didn't find a halfway important idea, but maybe I missed it. Though she sounds stupid, she taught at Boston College for over 30 years and set the foundation of feminist theology. She's had quite an influence over the feminist community to be certain.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:40 AM
3

Daly's comment was: If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males. Source: I suppose if she meant what you take her to mean, your following points are more or less accurate. For example, the very reason for gender selection is a lack of the ability to enforce the one child limit, let alone gender selection. It doesn't seem feasible e…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:50 AM
7

I take donnashowl's side on this one. It seems blatantly obvious that such generalizations like "Feminists are "misandrists" are irreparably false. I'd go to say that half of feminists certainly clash with KMFCM's portrayal of them. And yes, I do believe the other half (perhaps less than a half now because I'm specifically talking about radical thinkers here) would subscribe to Mary Daly, who has in an interview said she would like to see the drastic reduction of men. Those feminists are certain…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:14 AM
1

Yes, we need to know what to do. How do we contact someone in charge of this mistake? How do we make this better?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 10:13 PM
2

Fair enough. I forgot about that guy actually, so thanks
/r/MensRights18/07/11 06:51 AM
2

I agree with vapid, but wench? Great response by the way.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 06:40 AM
1

Hahaha, dude as much as I'm on our side, there's no way they're canceling The Talk. That's just unprecedented. While we're giving absurd ultimatums, we should probably recommend CBS terminate itself in shame of The Talk's mishap.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 06:37 AM
6

would you mind posting the list of sponsors of this show, post it in Mensrights with the aim of spreading the word that they ought be boycotted? I'd very much appreciate it.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 06:33 AM
6

you're responding to the wrong part of the article Megan Milanese wrote. ExpendableOne refers to the "Your un-founded opinions don't trump our experiences" part of the article, not the "please don't interrupt us, men" part. I also have to disagree about your use of the word "faint." It was pretty strong.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 04:42 AM
-1

that might be from chomsky, though he uses it in a far more sophisticated way that I'd love to explain to you if you have the time.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 05:14 AM
3

it's a comparison of what ought to be and what is. Practically, sure, we have a satisfactory lifestyle and amounts of freedom. But no justice is ever made by assuming the present is good enough. We ought to march on to a better day and a comparison of the two worlds is well-founded.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 05:13 AM
3

All apples are red. Just because I said that, doesn't make it true. Just because I've seen only red apples doesn't mean there aren't green ones. Until you cite a legitimate study, so-called "valid" generalizations aren't valid.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 10:37 PM
2

I agree with everything you said, even the title. Downvoted for thinking the masculinist movement is stupid. Next time, don't misrepresent the reasonability our ideology offers.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter