TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheChronographer Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by TheChronographer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I think because this was the 3rd time they had been there, combined with the provocation that getting a beating (broken collar bone etc.) comes with he was fine. He “held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily injury,” The boyfriend was charged with murder but ultimately acquitted of that charge, but sentenced to more than a decade for robbery including great bodily injury and elder abuse.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/22 02:38 AM
3

This is murder Correct, the boyfriend was charged with murder.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/22 02:25 AM
5

I get that exact argument at work. "Why, why oh why, do our female employees always take more time off to raise a child than our male employees? This allows men of equal age to get ahead in promotions." Maybe it's because you offer six times as much leave to women than you do to men? And you'll hold a woman's position open unpaid for 2 years but don't do the same for a man, so he's forced to return to work. "Why! we just can't work it out! Men must hate their children!"
/r/MensRights16/03/21 11:52 PM
1

I think he took it a bit far with that punch to the head. But yeah, even in this very one sided clip you can see her hit him with the shoe. She swings from the left and he blocks it with his hand, when she brings it about around from the right she clips the side of his head. That's when he has had enough and pulls her down, only after she makes contact.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/20 12:38 PM
1

British humor.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 02:12 AM
1

Counter example: My partner works hard for 25 years to support us and I stay at home. After 25 years they want to retire, I want to divorce. Why should they be forced support me with 50% of the pre-divorce income for the next 25 years? Solution: Estate/shared assets split 50:50, but NO alimony. Smaller corrections possible: Maximum 3 years or half marriage length whichever is shorter. 3 years is enough to get a new career, only married 4 years? You don't need another 3. Bi-directional obviously.…
/r/MensRights09/06/20 02:11 AM
3

I don't see anything wrong in that. It is correct in saying that you can't just consider a woman to be a 'small man' there are differences. Also note that this is from CASG, which is logistics and engineering. They are likely talking about the difference in equipment requirements for female soldiers, and logical requirements like hygiene products and thermal considerations.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 02:00 AM
1

"I identify as a woman" What are they going to do? Discriminate against trans women entrepreneurs?
/r/MensRights04/06/20 02:37 AM
4

however now I feel there is a general consensus and I feel most people agree that feminism is about gender equality, not just about women's problems Which would make that the distortion, would it not?
/r/MensRights03/06/20 05:39 AM
1

If you do it again you will be going to prison. Lets see that … sure and since So, literally did do it again, but still no prison.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 05:30 AM
4

It is for equality between the sexes It's not, else you would be able to post about men's issues. I feel the word feminism has been distorted From the start feminism is and has been the advocacy for women's rights. The basis of this advocacy was to help women achieve equal rights as men, but it was never a place for men's issues. In that way, they are right to remove your post, and you are wrong about what feminism is.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 05:24 AM
2

This Christmas just past I told a guy to pick up his dog shit and he tried to attack me Maybe if you were recording him he would have thought twice about it, or you'd have evidence if he did. shouting a demand while filming - it's demeaning. He only started recording after she refused his polite request.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 02:57 AM
1

We could also only look at the concluded cases. If 8% are proven false, and 8% are proven true, then it's about 50:50 which lines up with the officer testimony. Though I would say that a lot of the undetermined cases brought to police could be true, but no chance of identifying a suspect, I wouldn't characterise that as women lying.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 02:19 AM
9

It’s just another medical procedure, one that is actually necessary for some people who get infections There seems to be very few parts of the body that we choose amputation not only as the first treatment, but a preventative treatment for infections. Usually we just go with antibiotics. I'm fairly sure young females are more prone to UTI's than young males, but few people would recommend surgery as the first line of treatment. Odd, don't you think? Tonsils and appendix are two others that come …
/r/MensRights13/05/20 06:16 AM
3

It isn't sexist or discriminatory. … Their competency has nothing to do with it, it is a bias. Uhhhh.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:37 AM
1

If you're not getting up at 4 am, putting in a 12 hour shift at the factory, then getting home at 6pm to cook your stay at home wife a meal then doing all the housework before collapsing in bed, can you even be called a man? Oh, and can you mow the lawn and clean out the gutters again? That's outdoors so it is a male job. /s
/r/MensRights10/02/20 02:09 AM
4

It even says in the post (and they read it out) that she gets up at 4:30 "with [her] huasband". Therefore, he is getting up at 4:30 too, presumably to go to work as he is the sole provider.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 10:11 AM
6

FGM: Type I. Partial or total removal of the clitoral glans and/or the prepuce/clitoral hood Type 1a: Removal of the prepuce/clitoral hood only. Type 4: This includes all other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes, e.g. pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterizing the genital area. Prepuce: Prepuce, refers to two homologous structures of male and female genitals: Clitoral hood, skin surrounding and protecting the head of the clitoris; Foreskin, skin surro…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 03:25 AM
2

So for me i don’t agree men can walk away from the baby they helped create with 100% responsibilities. … but i do kinda agree they should help support their child. In many jurisdictions women can legally abandon a born child with no requirement that she support the child in any way. Men typically have no such rights. Often the rights to put a child up for adoption are not equal too, fathers not able to adopt out a child without consent of the mother, but the reverse is not true. E.g. In Australi…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:10 AM
10

Simple back of the envelope stats 101 lesson. Lets say 2-10% of rape cases are proven true. Let say 2-10% of rape cases are proven false. What is the chance that a rape case, given that is it proven one way or the other, is true? 50%.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 12:45 AM
18

Or Labiaplasty, which is becoming more common in adults, but would be illegal under FGM laws for infant girls.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:47 AM
28

There's nothing wrong with a woman wanting to get a labiaplasty, but we'd probably agree there's something seriously wrong with doing it to infant girls just because we think it 'looks better'. Now replace woman and man and labiaplasty with circumcision and it should be pretty easy to work out.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:46 AM
2

Not only does watching sports bring people from around the world together, but it provides a space for people to express their national pride Sounds like Entertainment? it motivates people to get up and get active themselves Like a public health announcement? So shouldn't they get paid proportional to how effective they are at that? Maybe how many people see them being active i.e. viewership numbers. Oh that sounds the same as entertainers. Athletes are such powerful role models Like celebrities…
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:28 AM
3

A similar thing happen is Australian government jobs. They found that even though the majority of employees were women, the higher up the ranks you went there were more men ergo there must be discrimination. The solution was simple, have a system of anonymising resumes/CVs of people applying for promotions. This was put into place as a trial. The result was that men were promoted even more, there actually was a strong positive female bias, unsurprising as the APS is very female dominated. The mo…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:21 AM
3

I remember a study floating around a while ago about how few people actually had been roofied. Only a small percent of people who receive medical treatment and believe their drink had been spiked tested positive for anything other than alcohol. Now some may be due to the type of drugs being used evading detection, but a large percentage of 'someone spiked my drink' stories are really 'I consumed too much alcohol' stories.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 12:21 AM
2

A safe space for non-binary individuals but only serves females. Hmmm. LGBTQ community, but do not serve gay men, or trans men? If you specialised in one sex or the other I could kind of give you a pass, like a barber or women's hair salon, but not if you try to claim you are inclusive.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 12:08 AM
5

Like that story about the lesbian couple that had a child through sperm donation. They promised he wouldn't be on the hook for child support so he agreed. Later they broke up and even though there are two perfectly capable female parents the state went after the man to provide child support for 'his' child. Pretty sure he has no legal rights to visit or have custody of the child because he didn't 'play a role in raising them'. But that doesn't stop him having 100% of the responsibilities because…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:00 AM
4

This is not quite true. Most all of the men in that study (>85% from memory) said they were comfortable with the side effects and would take the pill if it was available. But it did have much more significant downsides than the typical female pill. I think two of the participants committed suicide, and a high number were left permanantly infertile (more than a year after stopping). The doctors deemed the high rates of suicide and permanent after effects too great and stopped the trial.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:23 AM
7

I don't understand what having an intact dick has to do with being 'beta'. Also I thought everyone on reddit was already banned from twox for being male, they do love the auto ban.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 12:51 AM
10

I like how you quoted the definition of 'mutilate' as if it helps your case. Inflict a violent and disfiguring injury on Sounds like circumcision fits that perfectly. Female genital mutilation (FGM), also known as female genital cutting and female circumcision, is the ritual cutting or removal of some or all of the external female genitalia. Interesting that "ritual cutting or removal of some or all of the external female genitalia." is mutilation. How did you describe male circumcision again? c…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 12:43 AM
2

The couple had four children together and he thought they'd built life together This is a mother of 4 children, why should it be any different because she is a mother? I'd hate my mother if she cheated on my father too.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 02:37 AM
2

Racism is illegal in my country, which means that racial prejudice is not structurally upheld. Therefore by their definition there are no racists. We did it, mission accomplished. Unfortunately it is legal to discriminate against men (but not women), so sexists can still exist. Prejudice against men is structurally supported.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 02:10 AM
1

It depends where you are. In Australia our sex discrimination laws are ironically sexist. It is illegal to discriminate hiring based on sex, unless you are giving preference to women, that is specifically excepted from the law.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 12:56 PM
3

I liked this comment on financial abortions for the father: And if the children aren’t adequately financially supported because of a financial abortion, the burden of supporting that child then shifts to the state and the tax payer. So the feminist commentor never even consideres that a woman could financially support a child that she chose to have. In their mind if the father doesn't pay, the government must. So much for women being strong and independent, feminism is really disempowering to wo…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:59 PM
1

I think you misunderstand: The new rules, introduced earlier this month, come amid a national debate over proposals to allow people to change gender without obtaining a gender recognition certificate. This is an official document that legally recognises a person’s ‘acquired’ gender, and requires proof that the person has been living as that gender for at least two years. The reforms were put on hold last year after a backlash from women’s rights campaigners, but Leeds has now become the first lo…
/r/MensRights16/04/19 02:23 AM
1

She testified that Wilson then led her out of the bar, drunkenly stumbling, to his house a couple of blocks away...According to the accuser, she then left Wilson’s home to return to the bar. She met her cousin there, who she originally came to the club with, and the following day she proceeded to go to a hospital for a sexual assault examination. Mr. Wilson estimated that the two were inside his room for about five minutes before leaving and going back to the nightclub... he never removed her cl…
/r/MensRights16/04/19 01:58 AM
1

Biological sex has several dimensions, including chromosomal, gonadal, and phenotypical sex Except we know that and for all of these humans are bimodal. With the vast vast majority falling into male or female. A tiny minority have genetic defects or some other ambiguity. None of those ambiguities point to a third independent sex. Why are you talking about sex anyway, when the meme is about gender? There are men, there are women, and there are people for which it's complicated. Yeah, and the righ…
/r/MGTOW16/03/19 04:04 AM
1

For you Celsius folks, that's minus 32° C. Between -30 and -50 it really doesn't matter which scale you use, which is helpful.
/r/MGTOW31/01/19 10:20 PM
4

Calling someone an 'incel' is equivalent to calling someone a 'slut'. But the one more often applied to women is deemed a horrible slur, and the one more often applied to men is perfectly acceptable. Seems almost sexist.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 02:50 AM
14

While a agree that he shouldn't have cheated, the people who say "He cheated so he deserves to lose it all" are the same people who say "Well it's a no fault state so it doesn't matter if she cheated". Which to me sounds like hypocrisy.
/r/MGTOW10/01/19 10:50 PM
1

They are compensated for it by being supported financially for the years they are together, are they not? And with half the accumulated assets during the relationship. Child support is for raising children. So it would be fairer to consider the case of a "homemaker" and a career person earning the money. Is the high income earner compensated for their time spent earning enough to support two people? after the relationship breaks down?
/r/MensRights30/11/18 10:07 AM
6

Cut that nasty shit off your kid. Yeah, cut off your daughters labia too. And all your kids ear lobes, pinky toes, noses and eyelids. Who put all these extra disgusting things on humans. You can wait till their 4 to remove their finger nails and your son's nipples. /s
/r/MensRights20/11/18 02:12 AM
2

screaming at my husband as if he represented every clueless male on the planet (and I every angry woman of 2018), I announced that I hate all men and wish all men were dead. That would be verbal domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 05:10 AM
1

Legit, I would just kill myself. After making sure none of my life insurance would pay out or would go to the woman.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 12:47 AM
1

Those lines were from two different mothers. One has them every other week, 50:50, the other has them during the week and not on weekends.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 12:59 AM
8

Just FYI, none of the sources you linked corrected even for the most basic of "How many hours did the person work?" in the 20-30% gap figure quoted in 'the myth'. For example, sources in your third link state: "While a portion of this gap can be explained by various factors, an apples-to-apples comparison looking at workers one year out of college and controlling for factors known to affect earnings, such as major, occupation, and hours worked reveals there is still an unexplainable 7 percent ge…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter